Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kinetics of Enzyme-Catalyzed Reactions: Michaelis-Menten Kinetics Enzyme Inhibition Kinetics of Two-Substrate Reactions Ribozymes and Abzymes
Assumption 1
Only consider early times in the reaction [P] is very small v-2 is negligible step 2 is essentially irreversible k1 k2 E+S ES k-1
E+P
So the initial rate v0 = k2[ES] We can easily measure initial rates, but [ES] is very difficult to measure
Assumption 2
Briggs-Haldane Steady State Assumption rate of ES formation = rate of ES breakdown k1[S]([E]total - [ES]) = k-1[ES] + k2[ES] [ES] = k1[S][E]total k-1 + k2 + k1[S] [S][E]total [S] + k-1 + k2 k1
[ES] =
Substitute for [ES] in the initial rate equation v0 = k2[ES] [ES] = [S][E]total [S] + k-1 + k2 k1
v0 =
Assumption 3
[S] >> [E]total The enzyme is saturated with substrate [ES] = [E]total So we can define a maximum rate Vmax where Vmax = k2[E]total v0 = Vmax[S] [S] + k-1 + k2 k1
v0 = Vmax[S] Km + [S]
The Michaelis-Menten equation is the rate equation for a one-substrate enzymecatalyzed reaction It quantitatively relates the initial rate, the maximum rate, and the initial substrate concentration to the Michaelis constant Km
Understanding Km
The "kinetic activator constant" Km is a constant with units M Km is a constant derived from rate constants Km is, under true Michaelis-Menten conditions, an estimate of the dissociation constant of E from S Small Km means tight binding; high Km means weak binding
Understanding Vmax
theoretical maximal velocity Vmax is a constant with units s-1 Vmax is the theoretical maximal rate of the reaction - but it is NEVER achieved in reality To reach Vmax would require that ALL enzyme molecules are tightly bound with substrate Vmax is asymptotically approached as [S] is increased
Catalytic Efficiency
kcat/Km An estimate of "how perfect" the enzyme is kcat/Km is an apparent second-order rate constant It measures how the enzyme performs when [S] is low The upper limit for kcat/Km is the diffusion limit - the rate at which E and S diffuse together (108 to 109 s-1)
Lineweaver-Burk Plot
Hanes-Woolf Plot
Lineweaver-Burk Plots
Vmax 800 v0 (s-1) 600 400 200 Vmax = 1000 s-1 Km= 1x10-4 M
1/V max
2x10 -4
4x10 -4
6x10 -4
8x10 -4
10 -3
-1/Km
-5000
0 1/[S] (M -1)
5000
10000
[S] (M)
Note how the straight line fit can be weighted by unreliable values at small [S] and v0 The Lineweaver-Burk plot is useful for comparing inhibition mechanisms
Enzyme Inhibitors
reversible versus irreversible Irreversible inhibitors interact with an enzyme via covalent associations Nerve agents like sarin are irreversible inhibitors of acetylcholine esterase Reversible inhibitors interact with an enzyme via noncovalent associations For therapeutic drug design were almost always interested in reversible inhibitors
Reversible Inhibition
Competitive inhibition - I binds to E, not to ES Substrate and inhibitor compete for the active site Vmax unchanged In principle we can always add enough substrate to produce saturated ES (though not in practice) Km becomes Km + Km[I]/KI where KI is the equilibrium constant for E + I = EI The apparent ES association gets weaker (Km gets larger)
Reversible Inhibition
Noncompetitive inhibition - I binds either to ES or to E and ES Pure noncompetetive inhibition (uncommon) The binding of I to E has no effect on the binding of S E + I = EI and ES + I = ESI have the same KI S and I bind at different sites and the active site is unaffected by I Km is unchanged The inhibitor is not binding at the active site, so Vmax cannot be recovered by raising [S] Vmax becomes Vmax/(1 + [I]/KI) I only affects k2, for example by slowing product release
Reversible Inhibition
Noncompetitive inhibition - I binds either to ES or to E and ES Mixed noncompetetive inhibition (common) Binding of I by E influence binding of S E + I = EI has KI ES + I = ESI has KI KI ! KI Both Km and Vmax are changed Km becomes (Km + Km[I]/KI)/(1 + [I]/KI) Vmax becomes Vmax/(1 + [I]/KI) Inhibitor binds close to the active site, or by binding elsewhere on E has an influence on the active site
Reversible Inhibition
Uncompetitive inhibition - I binds only to ES Few examples known, eg Roundup is an uncompetetive inhibitor of 3-enolpyruvlyshikimate-5-P synthase ES + I = ESI has KI Both Km and Vmax are changed Km becomes Km/(1 + [I]/KI) Vmax becomes Vmax/(1 + [I]/KI)
1 + [I]/KI Vmax
-1 + [I]/KI Km
-1 Km
Irreversible Inhibition
Suicide substrates Substrate analogs that become highly reactive through normal action of E Form covalent bonds at or near the active site causing irreversible inhibition Eg penicillin reacts with an active-site serine
Glycoprotein peptidase crosslinks cell wall peptidoglycans in gram-negative bacteria Weakened cell walls halt bacterial growth
Bimolecular Reactions
The general case is A + B P+Q Possible routes 1. E + A + B EAB EPQ E+P+Q sequential, or single displacement mechanism may be random or ordered 2a. E + A EA EP E + P b. E + B EB EQ E+Q ping-pong, or double displacement mechanism
A+ E
EA
EP
P+ E
For the special case in which A has no influence on the binding of B (and vice versa) the lines on a double reciprocal plot intersect on the 1/[A] axis Km doesnt change with [A] or [B]
EAB
EPQ
B + E
EB
EQ
Q+ E
Ordered Single Displacement Reactions A binds to E, then B binds to EA. A is the leading substrate B does not bind E
E A A E
EA B
EP Q
E P
E Q
E B
Ribozymes and Catalytic Antibodies Ribozymes - segments of RNA that display enzyme activity in the absence of protein Examples: RNase P and peptidyl transferase Catalytic antibodies - antibodies raised to bind the transition state of a reaction of interest
Catalytic Antibodies