Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(continued)
A metallurgical failure analysis was performed on a set of carbon steel gantry crane wheels following observation of excessive damage to the central tread surfaces. Rolling contact fatigue was considered as a possible failure mechanism due to the presence of what appeared to be spalling. Metallographic evaluation and hardness testing revealed that portions of the wheel tread surface had not reached the specified case hardness during heat treatment, leaving the tread surface edges in a near normalized condition. Continual contact with the rail during service allowed for plastic flow of the softer materials across the surface, resulting in the observed damage. Keywords: flame hardening, heat treatment failure, rolling contact, spalling, wear
E.E. Vernon, M.E. Stevenson, and J.L. McDougall, Metals and Materials Engineers LLC, 1039 Industrial Court, Suwanee, GA 30024. Contact e-mail: evernon@mmelab.com
Fig. 2
Fig. 4
A close-up view representative of the delineation on the tread surface of the submitted gantry crane wheels
Fig. 3
Photograph outlining the three main areas of interest on the submitted wheels
etching of metallographic cross sections revealed a clear distinction between the macrostructure of the case hardened tread surface and the remainder of the wheel section (Fig. 5). Microscopic inspection revealed that the microstructure of the wheel flanges was a matrix of equiaxed ferrite grains with colonies of pearlite distributed throughout, as anticipated for normalized steel. The microstructure of the steel at the center of the tread surface was predominantly tempered martensite, as anticipated for flame hardened 1045 steel. At the wear interface, however, it was apparent that the surface condition originally believed to be caused by spalling was, in fact, due to plastic deformation of normalized and/or partially hardened material from the tread surface edges. This phenomenon was evidenced by the visible plastic flow patterns toward the center of the tread surface. Additionally, it was observed that the microstructure in the deformed region was comprised of highly elongated grains of ferrite and pearlite (Fig. 6). Had wear occurred on the tread
Fig. 5
surface, the observed flow patterns would be aligned at 90 to the observed flow. Furthermore, the deformed microstructure would contain a significant amount of tempered martensite.
Hardness Testing
Hardness measurements taken at multiple locations along the tread surface and flange of one of the wheels corroborated the metallographic evaluation. The specified case hardness range, 212 to
17
(continued)
measurements suggest that the root cause of failure was improper heat treatment of the crane wheels. Few details are known regarding the flame hardening process used for the wheels; however, it likely involved Fig. 6 Composite micrograph image illustrating the plastic flow of elongated grains of ferrite and the wheel being suppearlite on the tread surface of one of the wheels ported and mechanically 240 HB, converts into a Rockwell C scale range rotated while a stationary flame was applied to the of 18 to 23 HRC. The average measured hardness tread surface. Microstructural evidence suggests that value at the center of the tread surface was approxa uniform heat treatment of the tread surface was imately 22 HRC, within the specified case hardnot accomplished. The full case hardness was ness range. Toward the outer edges of the tread achieved only at the center of the tread surface, surface, however, the average hardness value dropped while the outer edges of the tread surface remained to approximately 85 on the Rockwell B scale in a near-normalized state (Fig. 7). Continual cyclic (HRB)well below the specified range. The contact with the rail while in service resulted in average hardness of the wheel flanges was approxiplastic deformation of the softer edges, as exemmately 78 HRB. It should be noted that the edges plified by the elongation of grain structure toward of the tread surface retained a hardness value the center of the tread surface. The localized deforslightly higher than that of the flanges, indicating mation and the cyclic nature of the applied stresses that they were at least partially hardened by either resulted in surface spallation in the region of microcold work or by the flame hardening process. structural/hardness transition. Both the localized plastic deformation and spallation of the inner surConclusions/Recommendations faces of the flanges (which were observed to be in the normalized condition) contributed to the deposition Although the observed gantry crane wheel failof material debris on the central tread surface. ures had originally been attributed to improper rail alignment, the metallographic analysis and hardness In order to avoid reoccurrence of this type of failure, it was recommended that the flame hardening process be reviewed and/or revised in order to guarantee a consistent case hardening across the total tread surface. In addition, it was recommended that any surface that may potentially contact the rail during service, such as the inner flange surfaces, should likewise be case hardened.
References
1. P.J. Blau: Rolling Contact Wear, Friction, Lubrication, and Wear, vol. 18, ASM Handbook, ASM International, 1992. 2. G.F. Vander Voort: Metallography: Principles and Practice, ASM International, 1999. 3. Standard Hardness Conversion Tables for Metals, Designation E 140-84, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 03.01, MetalsMechanical Testing; Elevated and LowTemperature Tests, ASTM, W. Conshohocken, PA, 1986.
Fig. 7
Schematic drawing illustrating the condition of the wheels subsequent to heat treatment via flame hardening