Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic
Department of Computer Science and Electronic Mlardalen University
1
Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. (2006). Designing Qualitative Research. ISBN 9781412924894. Hansson, S.O. (2003). Konsten att vara vetenskaplig. Filosofi/KTH. http://www.infra.kth.se/~soh/downloads.htm Sherlock Holmes. I Doyle, A. Sherlock Holmes ventyr: En studie i rtt. ISBN 91-85267-22-8. Se ven www.wikipedia.com Semmelweiss - du sker sjlv information via internet, bibliotek, artiklar osv. 9
Sherlock Holmes
Sherlock Holmes, huvudpersonen i en serie vrldsbekanta detektivhistorier av sir Arthur Conan Doyle, och prototypen fr en skarpsinnig och inga mdor eller faror skyende yrkesdetektiv. Sherlock Holmes gjorde entr i vrlden 1887 i samband med romanen En studie i rtt, och vann stor ryktbarhet ngra r senare nr de frsta Holmesnovellerna brjade publiceras i tidskriften The Strand Magazine. Holmes karakteriseras av sin imponerande iakttagelse- och slutledningsfrmga vilken han d och d prvar p sin levnadstecknare, och fljeslagare Dr. Watson.
Sherlock Holmes
En studie i rtt (A Study in Scarlet) r den frsta boken om detektiven Sherlock Holmes och r skriven av Arthur Conan Doyle 1887. Det r i denna bok doktor Watson och Sherlock Holmes lr knna varandra och Sherlock Holmes-figuren introduceras fr vrlden. Genast startar en spnnande mordgta som ger prov p Sherlock Holmes skarpsinne.
http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherlock_Holmes
Innehll Frord 1 Vilken kunskap vill vi ha? 1.1 Vetande och handlingskunskap 1.2 Vetenskapsbegreppet 1.3 Ren och tillmpad vetenskap 1.4 Generell kontra speciell kunskap 1.5 Handlingskunskapen 1.6 Intersubjektivitet och objektivitet 1.7 Faran med auktoritetstro 1.8 Att utg frn den bsta tillgngliga kunskapen 1.9 Vetenskapen r en mnsklig aktivitet 1.10 Det stora och det lilla tvivlet 1.11 Sinnen och frnuft 1.12 Empirism och rationalism 1.13 Hantverkarnas bidrag 1.14 Episteme och techne nrmar sig varandra igen 6
2 Att resonera frnuftigt 2.1 Det rationella samtalet 2.2 Fora fr vetenskapliga samtal 2.3 Stegvis framlagda argument 2.4 Mngtydighet och vaghet 2.5 Nr behver ord vara vldefinierade? 2.6 Definitioner 2.7 Tre vgar till mer precisa begrepp 2.8 Vrdeladdade ord 2.9 Kreativitet och kritik 2.10 Intuition 3 Att observera 3.1 Sinnenas ofullkomlighet 3.2 Observationer r teoriberoende 3.3 Tekniken hjlper sinnena och minnet 3.4 Utvalda observationer 3.5 Fyra slags observationer 3.6 Nr observationsidealet inte kan uppns 3.7 Observatren sjlv 3.8 Att vara beredd p det ovntade 3.9 Kllkritik att dra slutsatser frn andras observationer 3.10 Mtningar 7
4 Att gra experiment 4.1 Experiment finns av mnga slag 4.2 Att konstruera ett experiment 4.3 Att separera 4.4 Att kontrollera variablerna 4.5 Experiment ska g att upprepa 4.6 Upprepning i praktiken 5 Att pvisa samband 5.1 Att prva hypoteser 5.2 Verifiering eller falsifiering? 5.3 Falsifieringens problem 5.4 Den ndvndiga sammanvgningen 5.5 Kravet om enkelhet 5.6 Slumpens skrdar 5.7 Statistisk hypotesprvning 5.8 All forskning r inte hypotesprvande 8
6 Att anvnda modeller 6.1 Tre slags modeller 6.2 Idealisering 6.3 Om faran med modeller 6.4 Simulering 7 Att frklara 7.1 Vetenskap utan frklaringar? 7.2 Frklaringar och frstelse 7.3 Frklaringsstt som har vergetts 7.4 Reduktioner 8 Att finna orsaker 8.1 Orsak som undantagsls upprepning 8.2 Orsaksbegreppet r antropomorft 8.3 Allt har inte en orsak 8.4 Att faststlla orsakssamband 8.5 Samverkan mellan flera orsaksfaktorer 9
9 Vetenskap, vrderingar och vrldsbilder 9.1 Vetenskapens beslutsfattande 9.2 Att skilja mellan fakta och vrderingar 9.3 Vetenskap och vrldsbild
10
http://www.idt.mdh.se/personal/gdc/work/courses.html
CDT314 - Formal Languages, Automata and Theory of Computation CDT403 - Research Methodology for Natural Science and Technology CDT212 - Vetenskapsmetodik (Scientific Method, in Swedish) CDT409 - Professional Ethics in Science and Engineering Research Ethics and Professionalism (Interdepartmental PhD course) Interdisciplinary Research and Co-Production of Knowledge (NEW! Interdepartmental PhD course) CD5650 - Philosophy of Computer Science, Swedish National Course (2004)
11
Highly effective thinking is an art that engineers and scientists can be taught to develop. By presenting actual experiences and analyzing them as they are described, the author conveys the developmental thought processes employed and shows a style of thinking that leads to successful results is something that can be learned. Along with spectacular successes, the author also conveys how failures contributed to shaping the thought processes. Provides the reader with a style of thinking that will enhance a person's ability to function as a problem-solver of complex technical issues. Consists of a collection of stories about the author's participation in significant discoveries, relating how those discoveries came about and, most importantly, provides analysis about the thought processes and reasoning that took place as the author and his associates progressed through engineering problems.
12
13
14
Skepticism
16
WHAT IS SCIENCE? What Sciences are there? What Liberal Arts are there? WHAT IS SCIENTIFIC METHOD? Critique of Usual Nave Image of Scientific Method WHAT IS KNOWLEDGE? SCIENCE, TRUTH AND MEANING
17
Lecture 1 SCIENCE, KNOWLEDGE, TRUTH, MEANING. FORMAL LOGICAL SYSTEMS LIMITATIONS LANGUAGE AND COMMUNICATION Lecture 2 SCIENCE, RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGY, SOCIETAL ASPECTS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. PROGRESS IN SCIENCE A BRIEF RETROSPECTIVE OF SCIENTIFIC THEORY Lecture 3 LANGUAGE AND COMMUNICATION, CRITICAL THINKING AND PSEUDOSCIENCE - DEMARCATION Lecture 4 GOLEM LECTURE. ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC CONFIRMATION: THEORY OF RELATIVITY, COLD FUSION, GRAVITATIONAL WAVES Lecture 5 COMPUTING HISTORY OF IDEAS Lecture 6 PROFESSIONAL & RESEARCH ETHICS
18
A red thread in this course: critical thinking. We use critical thinking as method when approaching science. We think (critically!) about critical thinking.
19
Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all.
Hypatia, natural philosopher and mathematician
20
What Is Science?
Concentric Rinds (Concentric Space Filling/Regular Sphere Division). Maurits Cornelis Escher
21
SCIENTISTS
"Scientists are people of very dissimilar temperaments doing different things in very different ways. Among scientists are collectors, classifiers and compulsive tidiers-up; many are detectives by temperament and many are explorers; some are artists and others artisans. There are poet-scientists and philosopher-scientists and even a few mystics." Peter Medawar, Pluto's Republic
22
Science (Lat. scientia, from scire, to know) is wonder about nature. Like philosophy, science poses questions but also has the specific means to answer them, as long as they concern the state and behavior of the physical world.
23
Science is the systematic study of the properties of the physical world, by means of repeatable experiments and measurements, and the development of universal theories that are capable of describing and predicting observations. Statements in science must be precise, such that other people can test them (in order to establish universality).
24
To do science is to search for repeated patterns, not simply to accumulate facts. Robert H. MacArthur Religion is a culture of faith; science is a culture of doubt. Richard Feynman
25
000 - Computers, Information & General Reference 100 - Philosophy & Psychology 200 - Religion 300 - Social sciences 400 - Language 500 - Science 600 - Technology 700 - Arts & Recreation 800 - Literature 900 - History & Geography
26
500 Science 510 Mathematics 520 Astronomy 530 Physics 540 Chemistry 550 Earth Sciences & Geology 560 Fossils & Prehistoric Life 570 Biology & Life Sciences 580 Plants (Botany) 590 Animals (Zoology)
27
Josh Dever at the University of Texas is compiling a "family tree" of philosophers related by the Ph.D. supervisor relation (or equivalent). The tree is online at
https://webspace.utexas.edu/deverj/personal/philtree/philtree.html
28
Culture
(Religion, Art, )
1
Natural Sciences (Physics, Chemistry, Biology, )
2
Social Sciences (Economics, Sociology, Anthropolog y, )
29
Critique of Usual Nave Image of Scientific Method (1) The narrow inductivist conception of scientific inquiry 1. All facts are observed and recorded. 2. All observed facts are analyzed, compared and classified, without hypotheses or postulates other than those necessarily involved in the logic of thought. 3. Generalizations inductively drawn as to the relations, classificatory or causal, between the facts. 4. Further research employs inferences from previously established generalizations.
30
This narrow idea of scientific inquiry is groundless for several reasons: 1. A scientific investigation could never get off the ground, for a collection of all facts would take infinite time, as there are infinite number of facts. The only possible way to do data collection is to take only relevant facts. But in order to decide what is relevant and what is not, we have to have a theory or at least a hypothesis about what is it we are observing.
31
A hypothesis (theory) is needed to give the direction to a scientific investigation! 2. A set of empirical facts can be analyzed and classified in many different ways. Without hypothesis, analysis and classification are blind. 3. Induction is sometimes imagined as a method that leads, by mechanical application of rules, from observed facts to general principles. Unfortunately, such rules do not exist!
32
Why is it not possible to derive hypothesis (theory) directly from the data? (1)
For example, theories about atoms contain terms like atom, electron, proton, etc; yet what one actually measures are spectra (wave lengths), traces in bubble chambers, calorimetric data, etc. So the theory is formulated on a completely different (and more abstract) level than the observable data! The transition from data to theory requests creative imagination!
33
Why is it not possible to derive hypothesis (theory) directly from the data? (2)
Scientific hypothesis is formulated based on educated guesses at the connections between the phenomena under study, at regularities and patterns that might underlie their occurrence. Scientific guesses are completely different from any process of systematic inference. The discovery of important mathematical theorems, like the discovery of important theories in empirical science, requires inventive ingenuity.
34
Socratic Method
1. Wonder. Pose a question (of the What is X ? form). 2. Hypothesis. Suggest a plausible answer (a definition or definiens) from which some conceptually testable hypothetical propositions can be deduced. 3. Elenchus ; testing, refutation, or crossexamination. Perform a thought experiment by imagining a case which conforms to the definiens but clearly fails to exemplify the definiendum, or vice versa. Such cases, if successful, are called counterexamples. If a counterexample is generated, return to step 2, otherwise go to step 4.
Scientific Method
1. Wonder. Pose a question. (Formulate a problem). 2. Hypothesis. Suggest a plausible answer (a theory) from which some empirically testable hypothetical propositions can be deduced.
3. Testing. Construct and perform an experiment, which makes it possible to observe whether the consequences specified in one or more of those hypothetical propositions actually follow when the conditions specified in the same proposition(s) pertain. If the test fails, return to step 2, otherwise go to step 4.
4. Accept the hypothesis as provisionally true. Return to step 3 if you can conceive any other case which may show the answer to be defective. 5. Act accordingly.
4. Accept the hypothesis as provisionally true. Return to step 3 if there are predictable consequences of the theory which have not been experimentally confirmed. 5. Act accordingly.
35
HYPOTHESIS
PREDICTIONS
2
Hypothesis must be redefined Hypotesen Hypothesis mste must bejusteras adjusted
6
Consistency achieved
37
When there are several rivaling hypotheses number of criteria can be used for choosing a best theory. Following can be evaluated: Theoretical scope Heuristic value (heuristic: rule-of-thumb or argument derived from experience) Parsimony (simplicity, Ockhams razor) Esthetics Etc.
38
Criteria which Good Scientific Theory Shall Fulfill Logically consistent Consistent with accepted facts Testable Consistent with related theories Interpretable: explain and predict Parsimonious Pleasing to the mind (Esthetic, Beautiful) Useful (Relevant/Applicable)
39
A philosophical statement developed by William of Ockham, (12851347/49), a scholastic, that Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate; Plurality should not be assumed without necessity. The principle gives precedence to simplicity; of two competing theories, the simplest explanation of an entity is to be preferred.
40
What Is Knowledge?
Platos Definition
Knowledge is justified, true belief. The problem with this concerns the word justified. All interpretations of justified are deemed inadequate. These analyses are an excellent example of the critique of theories of knowledge, but do not provide an answer to what knowledge is.
41
What Is Knowledge?
Platos Definition Gettier Problem
Edmund Gettier, in the paper called "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? argues that knowledge is not the same as justified true belief.
42
All observation is potentially contaminated, whether by our theories, our worldview or our past experiences. It does not mean that science cannot objectively [intersubjectivity] choose from among rival theories on the basis of empirical testing. Although science cannot provide one with hundred percent certainty, yet it is the most, if not the only, objective mode of pursuing knowledge.
43
44
46
47
48
49
Noumenon ("Ding an sich") is distinguished from phenomenon ("Erscheinung"), an observable event or physical manifestation, and the two words serve as interrelated technical terms in Kant's philosophy.
50
51
52
Physics professor is walking across campus, runs into Math professor. Physics professor has been doing an experiment, and has worked out an empirical equation that seems to explain his data, and asks the Math professor to look at it.
53
A week later, they meet again, and the Math professor says the equation is invalid. By then, the Physics professor has used his equation to predict the results of further experiments, and he is getting excellent results, so he asks the Math professor to look again. Another week goes by, and they meet once more. The Math professor tells the Physics professor the equation does work, but only in the trivial case where the numbers are real and positive."
54
55
Gdel theorem is built upon Aristotelian logic. So it is true within the paradigm of Aristotelian logic. However, nowadays it is not the only logic existing!
56
NON-ARISTOTELIAN LOGIC
The term non-Aristotelian logic, sometimes shortened to null-A, means any non-classical system of logic which rejects some of Aristotle's premises.
Related topics: Intuitionistic logic Fuzzy logic General Semantics Meta-systems Multi-valued logic Paraconsistent logic Quantum logic Is logic empirical? Theory of mind
57
58
59
Stuart A. Umpleby
60
61
1. Mathematical Isomorphisms
Anatol Rapoport suggested that the aim of general systems theory is to identify mathematical isomorphisms
The word 'isomorphism' applies when two complex structures can be mapped onto each other, in such a way that to each part of one structure there is a corresponding part in the other structure, where 'corresponding' means that the two parts play similar roles in their respective structures." (Douglas Hofstadter, Gdel, Escher, Bach, p. 49)
Not many isomorphisms have been discussed in the literature Their theoretical importance is not clear
63
Matter-energy processing subsystems ingestor, distributor, converter, producer,matter-energy storage, extruder, motor, supporter Information processing subsystems input transducer, internal transducer, channel and net, decoder, associator, memory, decider, encoder, output transducer Subsystems that process both reproducer, boundary
Stuart A. Umpleby
64
3. Conceptual models
In cybernetics there are basically three conceptualizations Regulation Self-organization Reflexivity
Stuart A. Umpleby
65
Stuart A. Umpleby
66
1. Regulation
Two analytic elements regulator and system being regulated Engineering examples thermostat and heater, automatic pilot and airplane Biological examples feeling of hunger and food in stomach, light in eye and iris opening Social system examples manager and organization, therapist and patient
Stuart A. Umpleby
67
Stuart A. Umpleby
68
Stuart A. Umpleby
69
Stuart A. Umpleby
70
There has been a lot of discussion of complexity, as if it exists in the world Cyberneticians prefer to speak about the management of complexity Their view is that complexity is observer dependent, that the system to be regulated is defined by the observer This point of view greatly expands the range of alternatives
Stuart A. Umpleby
71
Self-organization
72
Self-organization
Definition every isolated, determinate, dynamic system obeying unchanging laws will develop organisms adapted to their environments, W. Ross Ashby Many elements within the system Boundary conditions open to energy (hence dynamic), closed to information (interaction rules do not change during the period of observation)
73
Examples of self-organization 1
Physical example chemical reactions; iron ore, coke, and oxygen heated in a blast furnace will change into steel, carbon dioxide, water vapor and slag Biological examples food in the stomach is transformed into usable energy and materials, species compete to yield animals adapted to their environments
74
75
http://www.biolcell.org/boc/098/0603/boc0980603.htm
76
Replication of form
http://www.biolcell.org/boc/098/0603/boc0980603.htm
77
Numerical simulations containing only reactive and diffusive terms predict microtubule assembly kinetics and self-organization comparable with experiment
http://www.biolcell.org/boc/098/0603/boc0980603.htm
78
Motor proteins are key determinants for the spatial organisation of eukaryotic cells. They are thermodynamic non-equilibrium machines playing a crucial role for the dynamic nature of cellular order. In fact, they provide a paradigm for the concept of intracellular order depending on molecular dynamics. How exactly the collective behaviour of various motors with different kinetic properties drives the organisation of the cytoskeleton is not understood.
http://www-db.embl.de/jss/EmblGroupsOrg/g_175.html
Network of microtubules and two kinds of motor proteins created by self-organisation in vitro
79
The objective is to produce a language for describing global shape that can be compiled to local interactions amongst a large number of cells that work robustly inspite of imprecise positioning and individual cell limitations and failures. The long term goal is to contribute to the understanding of engineered self-organisation, i.e. rather than observing emergent global behavior from given local rules, how does one derive local rules for a particular global goal? What are the high level languages for describing global goals, and what are the primitives for constructing local rules? Origami is an example of a language that constructively describes global structures. Using a small set of axioms (called Huzita's axioms) and only two types of folds (mountain and valley), one can construct a very wide variety of complex shapes.The initial conditions are very simple and always the same. The methods of combination are very simple. Axioms generate new creases from existing points and creases and new points can be formed only by the intersection of previous folds. Origami is a scale-independent language - i.e. the sequence of folds for a particular shape is independent of the size of the sheet.
http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/projects/amorphous/Progmat/thesis/origami.html
80
Huzita's Origami Axioms: Given two points p1 and p2, we can fold a line through them Given two points p1 and p2, we can fold p1 onto p2 (make a crease that bisects the line p1p2 at right angles) Given two lines L1 and L2 we can fold L1 onto L2 (crease is a bisector of the angle between L1 and L2) Given p1 and L1 we can make a fold through p1 perpendicular to L1 Given p1 and p2 and line l1, we can make a fold that places p1 on l1 and passes through p2 Given p1 and p2 and lines l1 and l2, we can make a fold that places p1 on l1 and p2 on l2.
http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/projects/amorphous/Progmat/thesis/origami.html
81
Archive of papers - adaptation/self-organizing systems EVALife - Self-organisation in life-cycles Extropia - open source software Fractal Structures and Self-Organization - TMR Network One-Over-F Noise - bibliography Scalable Self-Organizing Simulations - DARPA Self-Organising Adaptive Systems - BT Labs Self-Organising Nanopatterns - Sandia National Laboratory Self-organization and fractals - Geodynamics Shalizi's Notebook - self-organization SOS on The Web - small Symbiotic Intelligence Project - self-organizing knowledge Stigmergic Systems - Peter Small The Self-Organization of the European Information Society - EU TSER Project WEBSOM Self-Organizing Maps - web intelligence
82
A Complex System is any system which involves a number of elements, arranged in structure(s) which can exist on many scales. These go through processes of change that are not describable by a single rule nor are reducible to only one level of explanation, these levels often include features whose emergence cannot be predicted from their current specifications. Complex Systems Theory also includes the study of the interactions of the many parts of the system. Previously, when studying a subject, researchers tended to use a reductionist approach which attempted to summarize the dynamics, processes, and change that occurred in terms of lowest common denominators and the simplest, yet most widely provable and applicable elegant explanations. But since the advent of powerful computers which can handle huge amounts of data, researchers can now study the complexity of factors involved in a subject and see what insights that complexity yields without simplification or reduction.
http://www.calresco.org/intro.htm
83
Four Important Characteristics of Complexity: Self-Organization Non-Linearity Order/Chaos Dynamic Emergent Properties Computer Programming approaches used for demonstrating, simulating, and analyzing these characteristics of Complex Systems: Artificial Life Genetic Algorithms Neural Networks Cellular Automata Boolean Networks
84
http://www.calresco.org/links.htm
85
Examples of self-organization
Large-scale lattice Boltzmann simulations of complex fluids: advances through the advent of computational grids Institute for Computational Physics. Physics on High Performance Computers http://www.ica1.uni-stuttgart.de/publications/2005/HCVC05/
86
"Self-organisation by selection takes advantage of dynamic diversity to allow variation in response to internal or external factors in a Darwinian fashion." "Constitutional dynamic chemistry paves the way towards an adaptive and evolutive chemistry, a further step towards unravelling the science of complex matter."
http://www.rsc.org/Publishing/ChemScience/Volume/ 2007/02/A_natural_selection.asp
Self-reference Reflexivity
88
89
Self-reference (Reflexivity)
This model has traditionally been avoided and is logically difficult Inherent in social systems where observers are also participants, in individual living organisms Every statement reveals an observer as much as what is observed
90
91
Observation
Self-awareness
Stuart A. Umpleby92
Stuart A. Umpleby
93
Ideas
Variables
Groups
Events
Stuart A. Umpleby
94
Equilibrium theory assumes negative feedback; reflexivity theory observes positive feedback
Stuart A. Umpleby
95
Stuart A. Umpleby
96
Adaptation/Reactivity/Regulation, Self-organization, Self-reference/Reflexivity/Recursiveness Models of regulation, self-organization, and reflexivity can be used in two ways Either to develop descriptions of some system (develop interdisciplinary models) Or to guide efforts to influence some system
Stuart A. Umpleby
97
Overview of cybernetics
The focus of attention within cybernetics has changed from engineering to the biology of cognition to social systems Ideas from cybernetics have been used in computer science, robotics, management, family therapy, philosophy of science, economics and political science Cybernetics has created theories of the nature of information, knowledge, adaptation, learning, self-organization, cognition, autonomy, and understanding
Stuart A. Umpleby
98
Author
The cybernetics of observed systems The purpose of a model Controlled systems Interaction among the variables in a system Theories of social systems
The cybernetics of observing systems The purpose of a modeler Autonomous systems Interaction between observer and observed Theories of the interaction between ideas and society
Stuart A. Umpleby
99
Engineering Cybernetics The view of epistemology A realist view of epistemology: knowledge is a picture of reality Reality vs. scientific theories
Social Cybernetics A pragmatic view of epistemology: knowledge is constructed to achieve human purposes The biology of cognition vs. the observer as a social participant Explain the relationship between the natural and the social sciences How people create, maintain, and change social systems through language and ideas Ideas are accepted if they serve the observers purposes as a social participant By transforming conceptual systems (through persuasion, not coercion), we can change society
A key distinction
Construct theories which explain observed phenomena How the world works
A key assumption
Natural processes can be explained by scientific theories Scientific knowledge can be used to modify natural processes to benefit people
Ideas about knowledge should be rooted in neurophysiology. If people accept constructivism, they will be more tolerant
An important consequence
SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION
Stuart A. Umpleby
101
Stuart A. Umpleby
102
103
The Humanities
(Philosophy, History, Linguistics )
Our scheme represents the classical groups of sciences. Modern sciences are stretching through several fields of our scheme. Computer science e.g. includes the field of AI that has its roots in mathematical logic and mathematics but uses physics, chemistry and biology and even has parts where medicine and psychology are very important. Examples: Environmental studies, Cognitive sciences, Cultural studies, Policy sciences, Information sciences, Womens studies, Molecular biology, Philosophy of Computing and Information, Bioinformatics, ..
105
Disciplinary change is a present day phenomenon. The discovery of DNA in the 1970s was a cognitive revolution which refigured traditional demarcations of physics, chemistry and biology. New fields of application arose. New discoveries, tools, and approaches change the way that research is conducted at empirical and methodological levels.
106
Research
TECHNOLOGY EXPANDS OUR WAYS OF THINKING ABOUT THINGS, EXPANDS OUR WAYS OF DOING THINGS. Herbert A. Simon
n a n d C r u d e C o m p l e x i t y 4 R a n d o m n e s s A C h i l d L e a r n i n g a L a n g u a g e 6 B a c 6 3 4 3
Preface Part I 1 2 3 4
5 1
ix
The Simple and the Complex Prologue: An Encounter in the Jungle Early Light Information and Crude Complexity Randomness A Child Learning a Language Bacteria Developing Drug Resistance The Scientific Enterprise The Power of Theory What Is Fundamental? 3 11 23 43 51 63 75 89 10 7
5 6 7 8 9
108
m p l e x i t y 4 R 4 a n d o m n e s s 3
Part II
5 C h i l d L e a r n i n g a L a n g u a g e
10
123
11
A Contemporary View of Quantum Mechanics: Quantum Mechanics and the Classical Approximation
135
12
167
a c t e r i a D e v e l o p i n g D r u g R e
13
177
14
199
15
215
109
m p l e x i t y 4 R 4 a n d o m n e s s 3
Part III
16
Selection at Work in Biological Evolution and Elsewhere From Learning to Creative Thinking
23 5 26 1 27 5 29 1 30 7
5 C h i l d L e a r n i n g a L a n g u a g e
17
18
19
20
Part IV
21
3
32 9 34 5 36 7 37 7
a c t e r i a D e v e l o p i n g D r u g R e
22
23
Afterword
Index
110
111
112
DNA is the primary chemical component of chromosomes and the material of which genes are made
113
114
MOLECULE - ATOM
115
116
117
POSTMODERNISM
From the mid 1970s to the late 1990s a cluster of anti-rationalist ideas became increasingly prevalent among academic sociologists in America, France and Britain. Those ideas have formed following fields
- Deconstructionism - Sociology of Scientific Knowledge (SSK) - Social Constructivism or - Science and Technology Studies (STS).
118
POSTMODERNISTS ANTI-SCIENTISM
All forms of post-modernism were anti-scientific, anti-philosophical and generally highly skeptic about rationalism. The view of science as a search for truths (or approximate truths) about the world was resolutely rejected. According to postmodernists, the natural world has a small or nonexistent role in the construction of scientific knowledge. Science was just another social practice, producing ``narrations'' and ``myths'' with no more validity than the myths of pre-scientific peoples.
119
POSTMODERNISTS ANTI-SCIENTISM
``The dictum that everything that people do is 'cultural' ... licenses the idea that every cultural critic can meaningfully analyze even the most intricate accomplishments of art and science. ... It is distinctly weird to listen to pronouncements on the nature of mathematics from the lips of someone who cannot tell you what a complex number is!'' Norman Levitt, from "The flight From Science and Reason," New York Academy of Science. Quoted from p. 183 in the October 11, 1996 Science)
120
POSTMODERNISTS ANTI-SCIENTISM
Modernism has provided the philosophical foundation for much of Western culture since the Enlightenment. Modernism reaches its highest form in science although this approach arguably influences all of Western culture. Inherent in modernism is the notion of an essence: the truth behind the appearances we see around us. Science is about discovering these essences as science slowly reveals the truth about the world around us. Postmodernist attacks on essentialism have taken aim at this modernism version of essentialism.
121
POSTMODERNISTS ANTI-SCIENTISM
Third, postmodernists assert that because no interpretative framework can be objectively shown to be true or false, the choice of interpretative framework is purely relativist and subjective. We are in the world of subjective values. That is, anything goes. This postmodern perspective provokes astonishment among those working within a modernist framework. For the most part, such people merely scoff at postmodernist attacks and believe no response is neededor possibleto what is seen as irrational anti-scientism.
122
Postmodernisms attack on modernism has undercut modernisms pretension to scientific objectivity. Yet postmodernisms success is actually very narrow and their devastating critique of modernism does not carry over to non-modernist perspectives on essences. Despite the great confidence of many postmodern thinkers, postmodernism makes sense as a general critique only if you accept two flaws of logic. Postmodernist values appear to be the following: people have a right to decide what to believe, oppression is bad, and diversity of interpretive frameworks is good.
123
An Alternative Resolution
Both modernism and postmodernism subscribe to the false dilemma discussed above: we face a starkand necessarychoice between the correspondence theory of truth and the subjectivist approach.
But in time, both in philosophy and politics, new ideas become old ideas; what was once challenging, becomes predictable and boring; and what once served to focus attention where it should be focused, later keeps discussion from considering new alternatives. This has now happened in the debate between the correspondence views of truth and subjectivist views. Hilary Putnam Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge University Press, 1981, page x.
124
Relationships between economy, politics, law, media, and science Emergent phenomena with nonlinear dynamics. Effects have positive and negative feedback to causes, uncertainties continue to arise, and unexpected results occur. Reality is a nexus of interrelated phenomena that are not reducible to a single dimension (Goorhuis, 2000; Egger & Jungmeier, 2000; Caetano, et al., 2000).
125
The new discourse centers on problem- and solution-oriented research incorporating participatory approaches:
problem-oriented, beyond disciplinarity, practice-oriented, participatory, and
process-oriented.
126
Interdisciplinarity is necessitated by complexity. The nature of complex systems, provides a comprehensive rationale for interdisciplinary study, unifies the apparently divergent approaches, and offers guidance for criteria in each step of the integrative process. The ultimate objective of any interdisciplinary inquiry becomes understanding the portion of the world modeled by a particular complex system. (William Newell)
127