Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Depression
Public Health Priority of the 21st Century
Hans-Ulrich Wittchen
Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Center of Clinical Epidemiology and Longitudinal Studies (CELOS) Technische Universitt Dresden.
25% of the EU population has been suffering or will suffer from depression at some point in life! In any given year, 9%* of the EU population suffers from depressive disorders This corresponds to 20.8 million women and men suffering from depression* each year Little evidence for major systematic variation in prevalence (+/- 2%) by EU region and country (when controlled for methodological
differences (time of study, sampling, diagnostic standards, instruments, analyses)
Males
15
13,5
Females
13,4 12,5 12,4
10,5
Range of findings
10
6,4 6,8 5,8 6,1
?
5,4
5
1,9 2,3
.. and affects Europeans particularly frequent during peak developmental and earning years and among women during the reproductive years!
age
Depression challenges
women more frequently than males (hormonal cycle, caregiver/multiple roles, trauma?) Comorbidity: most depression patient suffer from several disorders Disability: Academic/work failure/underperformance, early retirment and disability Suicide attempts, suicide, other reasons of premature mortality (somatic illnesses)
Wittchen & Jacobi. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005;15(4):357-76. Spijker et al 2001, Wittchen & Kessler 2002)
Depression is treatable!
Effective drug and psychological treatments exist (e.g. cognitive-behavioral
psychotherapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, various types of drug treatments)
Effective secondary preventive interventions exist (e.g relapse prevention) Effective preventive methods for complications exist (e.g. suicide prevention)
If applied (accessible, early enough, comprehensive, adequately) these methods should result in a lower prevalence (reduction of length and number of episodes)
The societal burden of depression has only recently been fully appreciated
Years Lived with Disability (YLD) and Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALY) are two time-related metric indicators to quantify the burden of diseases allowing for direct comparisons between diseases In the 90ies, the Global Burden of Disease experts estimated that: disorders of the brain account for over 31% of all YLDs worldwide and depression alone for 11% In terms of DALYS, they ranked depression as no. 4 worldwide, contributing 3.7% of all DALYS. It is projected that depression will become number 1 in the year 2020
A= lived in full health B= lived not in full health C=time lost to premature mortality
Wittchen & Jacobi. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005;15(4):357-76.
These past burden of disease estimations (1990 data) were problematic, and do not adequately reflect the situation in the EU!
Massive direct and indirect burden of depression:
Individual (e.g. high distress, disrupts social roles, work productivity, sickness days, disability, premature mortality)
Family (e.g. high emotional distress, economic consequences, malignant effects on dependent family members
The burden of depression in the EU has already become the most challenging public health burden: Reasons?
1. Improved data on disability burden, revealing that disorders of the brain account for about 40% of the total burden
Proportion (%) depression
15 1990 2000 2005 2030
10 7,8
9,2
9,8
other 3%
5,2 5
Markedly higher DALY proportions due to depression! Depression DALY ranks number 1 in 17 EU-states
Among all Disorder of the brain depression is responsible for the largest disability burden - particularly for females!
Proportion (%)of all neuropsychiatric DALYS
70
63 60,1
High disability burden even in early years Women carry by far the greatest depression burden For women in the reproductive years, depression accounts for 17-19% of all causes DALYs! Estimates after age 65* remain contradictory and problematic!
10,1
60 50 40
34,2 30,9 34,5 29,9 24,7 23,1
Males Females
30 20 10
0 0
27,6
16,8
5,4 2,2
3,5
Age groups
Wittchen et al, in press; European Health Report 2005
Depression accounts for almost 1/3 of all direct and indirect costs of disorders of the brain
All brain disorders: Health care costs: Direct non-medical Indirect costs: 386.176 billion 135.446 72.201 178.529
Mental disorders
Mental disorders
(w.o depression:
294.719
176.053)
Neurosurgical disorders Health care costs: 4.099 Direct non-medical 269 Indirect costs: 3.155
Depression 118.000
Neurological disorders Health care costs: 21.286 Direct non-medical 20.259 Indirect costs: 42.389
The total cost of brain disorders and depression in Europe by disease area ( PPP billion) Andlin-Sobocki et al 2005
12
Direct costs in Euro Health care costs: 42.000 - outpatient care 22.000 - hospitalisation 10.000 - drug cost 9.000
11
10
20
30
40
50
The largest economic burden associated with depression is carried by the employers and the social health system
Distribution of depression cost is markedly different from other treatable diseases: A comparison with two other common somatic illnesses
Depression
Diabetes
CVD
direct other
direct other
We should increase direct costs (treatment and prevention) for depression to decrease the indirect costs due to disability burden!
Depression is already now Europe`s most costly and debilitating illness (9.2% of all DALYs) Why has the burden of depression persisted or even increased?
15
Artefact of methods and statistics Disease is difficult to detect or diagnose Increasing depression rates? Overwhelming
causes?
10 7,8
9,2
9,8
5,2 5
Changes in the constitution of risk groups Effective treatment and prevention is not or
can not been provided
year
Prevention and Early intervention is not provided or effective! Treatment is not effective, too expensive, unavailable or unacceptable!
Artefact of methods and statistics Disease is difficult to detect or diagnose Increasing depression rates? Epidemic? Overwhelming causes?
5 10 7,8 9,2 9,8
5,2
Changes in the constitution of risk groups (eg increase in elderly or high risk groups) Effective treatment and prevention is or can not been provided
0 1990 2000 2005 2030
DALY estimates
Individuals do not seek treatment! Prevention and Early intervention is not provided or effective! Treatment is not effective, too expensive, unavailable or unacceptable!
Evidence for increasing depression rates in the past? Probably yes but little evidence for continued increases!
Cum. Incidence % (Kaplan Maeier)
20
Birth cohort
18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
0
10 20 30 40
Strong evidence for a substantial increase in depression risk since the 60ies in industrialized countries. Strong evidence for increased rates in the young! Age of onset shifted forward Earlier and more frequent! These effect seem to have weakened though in the past 15 years. No evidence for epidemic Nor overwhelming causes!
50
60
Increase due to longer life expectancy? Population 65+ is increasing! Age-related disorders, associated with increased risk for depression
Selected diseases among subjects aged 65+ by their depression risk elevation (ref.:
persons w.o. condition)
RR for Depression
Effect of comorbidity
10
Disease 3
Alzheimer dementia 1 Parkinsons Disease 2 Stroke Other neurological dis. Cardio-vascular dis. Cancer Musculo-skeletal dis.
8 6,2
OR
2,8
Number of diseases 1 Riedel et al 2005 2 Riedel et al 2008 3 Jacobi et al 2005 4 Pieper et al 2008 DETECT)
The risk for major depression increases steadily by number of diseases (Pieper et al 2008; DETECT)
Neurodegenerative disease Somatic diseases associated with pain Other disabling comorbid somatic diseases
depression in old age evidence of increased rates when other illnesses are present and when ability to function becomes limited The Elderly Paradox!
Did we fail to reduce the burden, because treatment for depression is unavailable, difficult, ineffective and expensive? Not ( or only partly) true! Effective first-line treatments are available Effective treatment delivery is not difficult given appropriate
training
Cost-effectiveness is robustly established Successful EU- (Prevention of Depresion and Suicide Making it Happen) and national programs (eg EAAD)
However, there is still tremendous room for improvement! Providing proactive and earlier treatment Designing and providing early trageted treatment Prevention
Social phobia
21
Depression
Netherlands
52
51
Italy
29
90
Germany
41
78
France
43
Diabetes
Asthma
0 20 40
USA
60 80 100
35
20
40
60
80
100
% of cases with depression in the community with treatment in the year of onset
Wang et al 2007
Odds ratio
(Pieper et al 2007)
risk for worse outcomes in heart failure risk of premature mortality (DETECT 2008)
Bi-directional relationsship?
2
10
Martini et al 2008
You cannot be too careful in choosing your parents! Children of anxiety and depression parents are at high for primary anxiety and secondary depression at early ages
Cum Incidence
0,5
0,4
no parental anxiety parental anx & dep no parental disorder parental depression
OR = 2.6 *
Major Depression
OR = 2.0 *
OR = 3.3 *
OR = 1.5 *
0,3
Dysthymia
OR = 2.0
OR = 1.5
Nicotinedependence Alcohol
0,2
Panic
0,1
PTSD
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Odds Ratios are controlled for age and sex of the respondents and comorbid disorders in the parents; no IA * sex; N = 2427;
11
Reducing the burden of parents pays off for the children as well Anxiety is the most powerful risk factor for depression Targeting anxiety and depression is particularly promising
Remember! 64% of all with suicide attempts have also anxiety disorders The most powerful and effective interventions exist for anxiety Preventing anxiety prevents depression and reduces morst effectively the overall burden
Martini et al 2008
Conclusion
it
Awareness/screening campaigns are necessary, but not enough It is not enough and effective to:
offer just one or two encounters and deliver a prescription Leave the job largely on overly busy primary care doctors or rely on self-help structures
Move from general prevention to early targeted intervention . .. within large-scale integrated regional preventive programs to avoid
fragmentation of care
12
13
14
Depression in the community is highly comorbid with all other mental disorders
Comorbid conditions typically affect course and outcome, precding comorbid disorder can be powerful risk factors (anxiety disorders, substance use disorders)
In all countries treatment rates are low! At best about 50% of depression cases receive any professional attention
Primary care is the most frequent provider (21-43%) Specialist care varies by country, but rarely exceeds 30% Treatment typically occurs late in the illnes progression
Facets of Burden
The burden of depression children of depressed parents Pregnancy, birth and depression The depressed child increseaed risk for adverse social and mental
devleopmental unless treated
Depression and the heart: Depression and physical health Depression and the elderly Caregiver burden Burden reduction Cost
15
depression across the life span patients needs (age, gender, risk groups) burden (individual, societal, cost) Mental health system characteristics (diversity, fragmentation) Fragmentation of health care (lack of continuity) Costs and cost benefits causal prevention and therapy Identifying the most promising targets
Conclusion
Depression, number 1 as the most debilitating diseases in the EU Depression, the most costly of all disorders of the brain in the EU The high burden is mainly attributable to the indirect costs Because of low recognition and low treatment rates the direct treatment costs are comparatively low Challenges in fighting the burden of depression Increase direct costs (access, availability, quality of treatments and care) Lower indirect cost (earlier treatment, targeted treatment and prevention, etc) Changing the situation requires concerted action on all levels and prioritization
16
The Situation
Depression a frequent and serious illness Lifetime risk: one out of four person in the community In any given year: 7-8% suffer from depression Depression may affect the young and the old Increasing rates particularly among the young Leading cause of suicide Major source of premature mortality in physical diseases Ranks as number 1 among the most disabling diseases Underrecognized and undertreated in helathj care systems
Only 50% of all 12-month depression cases receive treatment! Even in the most developed health care system
Health care sector
primary care other mental health psychologists psychiatrist inpatient any treatment no treatment 0 10 20
11,1 49,1 50,1 24,6 18,8 21,5 18,0
Note! Treatment rates within EU from a low of 24% to a high of 51.6% Although primary care is in all countries the most frequent provider, rates vary from 21% to 43%! Any contact is counted irrespective of intensity or appropriateness
30
40
50
60
Wittchen & Jacobi 2005
17
Mental Disorders and Depression Are Frequently Comorbid: 12-Month Comorbidities Among Mental Disorders
OR anxiety with Substance: 2.6 Depression: 6.9 Somatoform: 3.4
(Wittchen & Jacobi, 2005; adapted from ESEMeD/ MHEDEA 2000 Investigators, 2004)
Ich brauche die DALY und oder YLD getrennt nach Altersgruppe und Geschlecht
6% no consultation only drug treatment 5% only psychological treatment 14% 63% drug and psychological treatment consultation but no treatment 12%
Bitte machen
18
I. Methods
Epidemiological approaches
Unselected sample of the general population (or
fractions thereof)
Epidemiological methods allow a representative description of patterns of morbidity and supplement and complement clinical research findings
Sample of persons at risk (i.e. with anxiety, after stressful events) Persons in primary care Persons in treatment settings
Treated patients
(adaequate/inadaequate)
Clinical research
Life expectancy continues to grow! 3-4 years per decade in the EU! Proportion of population aged 65+ is increasing!
Japan Sweden Israel Italy Spain Netherlands UK France EU-15 average Austria Greece Germany Finland US Portugal Poland European Region Hungary Romania Russia 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 Japan Spain France Italy Sweden Finland Austria EU-15 average Germany Israel Netherlands Greece Portugal UK US Poland
Males
Females
1995 2005
56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86
1995 2005
76 78 80 82 84 86
Romania Russia
UNECE Statistical Division Database, compiled from national and international official sources (WHO, EUROSTAT, UNICEF Transmonee) (www.unece.org/stats/data, accessed 9 August 2007). WHO Statistical Information System (WHOSIS) / World Health Statistics 2007.
19
II. Prevalence
12-month prevalence (%, 95% CI) and estimated number of subjects affected 12 affected in 12-month the EU
eating disorders ill. subst. dep. OCD psychotic disorders bipolar disorder agoraphobia GAD panic disorder social phobia alcohol dependence somatof. disorders specific phobias major depression 0
Note:
Numbers add up to more than 27% and 82 million subjects because subjects can have more than one disorder (comorbidity)
1,1 Mio (0,9 - 1,7) 2,0 Mio (1,4 - 2,1) 2,6 Mio (2,4 - 3,0) 3,6 Mio (2,8 - 5,3 2,4 Mio (1,7 - 2,4) 3,9 Mio (3,3 - 4,7) 5,8 Mio (5,2 - 6,1) 5,2 Mio (4,3 - 5,3) 6,6 Mio (5,4 - 9,2) 7,1 Mio (5,8 - 8,6)
18.9 Mio. (12.6-21.1) 18.4 Mio. (17.2-19.0) 18.5 Mio. (14.3-18.6)
II. Prevalence
Because only full threshold depressive disorders are assessed in the 12month prevalence (blue), parally remitted, prodromal, and lifetime cases add to the overall lifetime estimate (orange)
10
20
30
40
50
ECNP-Task Force Report 2005 : Size and burden of Mental Disorders in the EU
20
The lifetime risk of depressive disorders of males and females in the community up to age 65
Cumulative hazard rate (%) 35 Incidence Major depression and Dystymia
Lifetime risk estimate Females: 35%
30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0
NGS: Wittchen et al (1999),
Total: 24%
Males 21%
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
Point prevalence3 mean: 3.4% (range: 1.2-6.5) 12-month prevalence2,3 mean: 6.9% (IQR: 4.8-8.0) Lifetime prevalence1 MD: 11.1% (IQR = 7.9-13.8) Lifetime risk for MDE (up to 75)4 16.3%
Point prevalence
12-Months prevalence
Lifetime prevalence
Lifetime risk
Age 75
Based on epidemiological evidence, we estimate that 20.8 million women and men in the EU suffer each year from depression
1. Wittchen et al. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994;51(5):355-64. 2. Wittchen & Jacobi. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005;15(4):357-76. 3. Lieb et al. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005;15(4):445-52. 4. Kessler et al 2005. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):617-27.
21
Proportion
10
20
30
40
50 1965-1974 1945-1954
60
65
Age
Birth cohorts
1974-1981 1955-1964 1935-1944
15
10
45-54 55-64
0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Alter 40 45 50 55 60 65
0,000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Alter
22
Alcohol/drug*
Across studies 1/3 of all cases of major depression attempt suicide However due to comorbidity rates are also high in anxiety and addictive disorders Comorbidity increases the risk of suicide attempts and suicide two- to threefold
Rates of abuse or dependence; ** Epidemiologic Catchment Area study; National Comorbidity Study, ages 18-64 years
Weissman et al (1999)
Conclusion: Estimates for depression are considerably different depending on what we are interested in
Lifetime risk estimate
24%
Total: 24%
15%
Note! The true prevalence of 1month and 1-year might be higher. This is because subthreshold depression (prodromal or residual) and successfully treated depression patients without current symptoms are not considered!
Lifetime prevalence Total: 15% 12-month prevalence Total: 6.9% 1-month prevalence Total: 4.1%
6.9% 4.1%
23
Increases are due to higher incidences of comorbid secondary depressions Projecting to beyond the year 2000 if increases continue, the prevalence of depression will double .. making major depression the second most costly and disabling (DALY) single disease worldwide
ICPE, SHO, World Bank, HMS: The Global Burden of Disease
Depression may occur at any point in life in females twice as often as in males cumulative incidence (%)
of MDE (Kaplan-Meier)
childhood
20
0,35
males females
15
13,5 13,4 12,5
0,30
Males Females
Few
12,4 data
0,25
0,20
10
6,8
9,5
0,15
6,4 5,8 6,1 5,4
0,10
0,05
0 1524
10
26-35
36-45
34-55
0,00
Wittchen et al. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994;51(5):355-64. Wittchen & Jacobi. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005;15(4):357-76.
24
N=20.304 primary care patients Year 2001 Point prevalence ICD-10 depression according to DSQ As compared to the community (4%) 2-3 times higher rates!
Age groups
Fact sheets
In in the EU fairly convergent estimates of number of persons affected Evey year 7-8% (males females?) Little evidence for cultural and regional effects Indications for increasing rates in the past and levelling off more recently
Data about depression in children are deficient And data about the elderly 65+ are largely lacking EU action: MentDis 65+ on ist way!
25
The burden of depression as a proportion of all causes and neuropsychiatric conditions by age
(GBD 2004: Projected DALYs by cause for the year 2008, optimistic scenario Europe)
More recent and more sophisticated global burden of disease findings supported this projection
26
The largest economic burden associated with depression is carried by the employers and the social health system
15,3
36,3
10,4
11,9
10
20
30
40
50
Kessler & Wittchen 2007
Definitely not!
Probably not!
27
Evidence in the consititution of risk groups? Life expectancy continues to grow in the EU! Proportion of population aged 65+ is increasing!
Males 1995-2005: 76,8in the Increase in life expectancy EU-15 from 1995 to 2005: Increase
Males: Females:
The risk of depression in the Elderly does not seem to increase in general, but only when other illnesses are present and when ability to function becomes limited The Elderly Paradox!
28
This paper was produced for a meeting organized by Health & Consumers DG and represents the views of its author on the subject. These views have not been adopted or in any way approved by the Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the Commission's or Health & Consumers DG's views. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof.