GP N 001175

MEMORANDUM

To:

ENG. VICENTE FOGLIO FEDE state coordinator

From:

ARCH. RAFAEL GONZALEZ Project Manager

Subject:

ISSUANCE OF THE EDUCATIONAL BUILDINGS PROJECT FOR FABRICIO OJEDA NEW CITY URBAN COMPLEX

Date:

Nov. 28th 2013

I am pleased to address you in order to return the entire project with the reviews performed in the different specialties in relation to the construction of educational buildings (Simoncito, Primary school and Bolivarian high school) in Fabricio Ojeda New City Urban Complex, located in the Lagunillas Municipality of such federal entity.

The reviews mentioned below are included: Architecture Structure Sanitary installations Electrical Installations

For your information, the Project Management performed a review of the project and it could be determined that it has important comments that need to be corrected in order to achieve the conformity of such. It should be mentioned that the incorporation of the changes and modifications stated on the report are indispensable requirements to grant the conformity of the

project. After the corrections have been made to the project, it shall be submitted again to this foundation for its reviews Sincerely,

Arch. Rafael Gonzalez Project Manager

Attachment: 03 boxes with the technical documentation of the project 01 yellow folder with the comments of the technical review

PROJECT REVIEW Calculation of Educational Requirement Responsible: BODY DESARROLLOS URBANOS DUCOLSA AND IRANIAN INTERNATIONAL HOUSING COMPANY Name of the project: Educational level or mode: Location: PERSON

Review date: New construction X Evaluator: Replacement

Fabricio Ojeda New City Urban Project Simoncito, primary school and high school Fabricio Ojeda New City, Integral Urban Development of The Rafael Urdaneta Socialist Ecological city, Lagunillas Municipality, State of Zulia October 14th 2013 Extension Location Restoration

Arch. Nelly Ana Montaa C.I.V.: 143.221 Colomba Trotta Cabrera C.I.V.: 82.289

Review No.:

001

Three folders containing the projects mentioned below were submitted to FEDE Project Management, by the representatives of: DESARROLLOS URBANOS DUCOLSA AND IRANIAN INTERNATIONAL HOUSING COMPANY, for the purpose of undergoing the respective review: 1. SIMONCITO PROJECT AND PROPOSALS OF TWENTY (20) LOCATIONS FOR THE FABRICIO OJEDA NEW CITY URBAN PROJECT. 2. PRIMARY SCHOOL PROJECT AND PROPOSALS OF FIVE (05) LOCATIONS FOR THE FABRICIO OJEDA NEW CITY URBAN PROJECT. 3. HIGH SCHOOL PROJECT AND PROPOSALS OF FIVE (05) LOCATIONS FOR FABRICIO OJEDA NEW CITY URBAN PROJECT. In this connection, the following comments and recommendations are made:

REVIEW OF THE CAPACITIES OF STUDENTS PER BUILDING Simoncito: 1. The submitted project indicates that the quantity of students to hold in the building will be 425, however, after checking the dimensions of the educational spaces, the maximum capacity per classroom was considered as follows: NURSERY (MATERNAL): Sixteen (16) children per classroom, for a total of ninety-six children KINDERGARTEN: Twenty-five (25) students per classroom, for a total of 300 students. TOTAL QUANTITY OF STUDENTS TO HOLD: Three hundred ninety-six (396) students. 2. The urban complex includes twenty (20) Simoncito locations; however, when comparing the quantity of students to hold per building to the total educational requirement of simoncitos, it is evident that the number of required locations is eighteen (18), to hold seven thousand one hundred twenty-eight (7128) students. Primary school: 1. The presented project indicates that the number of students to hold will be one thousand one hundred forty (1140) students, separated into five (05) sections per grade, however, when checking the quantity of educational spaces that the building has, it is considered that the capacity will be six (06) sections per grade, for a total of one thousand three hundred sixty eight (1368) students. 2. Based on the maximum capacity of the projected building and comparing it to the educational requirement for the primary level, the need to have seven (07) educational buildings for such purpose is evident. High school: 1. The presented project indicates that the number of students to hold will be one thousand one hundred forty (1140) students, separated into five (05) sections per grade, however, when checking the quantity of educational spaces that the building has, it is considered that the capacity will be seven (07) sections per grade, for a total of one thousand three hundred thirty (1330) students. 2. Based on the maximum capacity of the projected building and comparing it to the educational requirement for the primary level, five (05) educational buildings locations are approved for such purpose.

RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. The compliance with the required quantity of buildings per educational level indicated in both specific comments and the table of requirements presented in this report is requested. 2. The compliance with the required number of students per educational level indicated in this report is requested. It should be known that the quantities of students hereby established are the maximum limit, and in no case such requirements must be exceeded. Educational Requirement for Fabricio Ojeda New City Urban Project, State of Zulia (Iran)
Inhabitants: 60.400 Number of housing units: 12.080 Nursery: 0-3 years old Kindergarten: 3-6 years old Required quota: Simoncito: 0-6 years old Primary school: 6-12 years old Middle school and high school: 12-18 years old Educational level Simoncito (nursery and kindergarten) Primary Education (1 to 6. 2 P.E. classrooms) Middle school and highschool Quantity 18 7 5 Quantity of students per unit 396 1368 1330 Rate: 5 inhab./Housing unit

Calculation made with the quantity of students for buildings presented in the proposal 2792 children 4108 students 6900 students 9235 students 6341 students Total quantity of students per educational level 7128 9576 6650

Source: POBLACION DEL MUNICIPIO LAGUNILLAS, ESTADO ZULIA

CONCLUSIONS: AGREE DISAGREE X

NOTE: It is estimated that 50% of the calculated population in the nursery level will be received

FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Any arising doubts which are not clarified in this report must be referred to the manual of standards and recommendations for the design of educational buildings, prepared by the foundation of educational buildings and supplies, as well as the Ministry of Peoples Power for Education. 2. In the FEDE Project Management, we are at your service to provide advice, in order to comply with the standards and specifications for the design of educational buildings and

thus, guarantee high quality physical facilities in accordance with the Bolivarian Educational System. 3. The incorporation of the changes and modifications described in this report is an indispensable requirement to grant conformity to the project. 4. After making the corrections to the project, it must be submitted to this foundation again for the respective review.

Arch. Nelly Ana Montaa Evaluator

Arch. Colomba Trotta Cabrera Evaluator

PROJECT REVIEW Architecture Responsible: BODY DESARROLLOS URBANOS DUCOLSA AND IRANIAN INTERNATIONAL HOUSING COMPANY Name of the project: Educational level or mode: Quantity of students: Location: PERSON

Review date: New construction X Evaluator: Replacement

Simoncito project and proposals of twenty (20) locations for the Fabricio Ojeda New City Urban Project Nursery and Kindergarten 425 children Fabricio Ojeda New City, Integral Urban Development of The Rafael Urdaneta Socialist Ecological city, Lagunillas Municipality, State of Zulia October 14th 2013 Extension Location Restoration

Arch. Nelly Ana Montaa C.I.V.: 143.221 Colomba Trotta Cabrera C.I.V.: 82.289

Review No.:

001

One (01) folder containing the project: Simoncito project and proposals of twenty (20) locations for the Fabricio Ojeda New City Urban Project, was submitted to FEDE Project Management, by the representatives of: IRANIAN INTERNATIONAL HOUSING COMPANY, so that the documentation mentioned below undergoes the respective review: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Descriptive memory of the urban complex Urban drawings. It includes five (05) drawings Architecture descriptive memory Metric calculations Architecture drawings. It includes 32 drawings

In this regard, the following comments and recommendations are made:

LOCATIONS: General Considerations: 1. The type of perimeter fence for each one of the locations must be defined. 2. A parking space for the use of disabled people with the proper signs for such purpose must be considered. 3. The access of service vehicles (food loading and unloading, waste, among others) with the dimensions specified in the standard must be defined. 4. Include at least one (01) playground in each one of the locations. Another playground may be included in those land plots with a greater area. 5. The external areas and spaces must be designed, in order to use them as green areas, recreation or bench zones, for the enjoyment of children and students. 6. The minimum quantity of parking spaces will be six (06). In case of those plots with a limited area, they shall be adjusted to this quantity in order to allow greater green and recreation areas. Location SM-27-1: 1. General considerations will be taken into account Location SM-27-2: 1. General considerations will be taken into account Location SM-27-3: 1. General considerations will be taken into account Location SM-27-4: 1. General considerations will be taken into account 2. Comply with the spaces required in the standard (front: 6 mts, side: 3 mts and back: 4 meters) Location SM-27-5: 1. General considerations will be taken into account Location SM-28-1: 1. General considerations will be taken into account 2. Comply with the spaces required in the standard (front: 6 mts, side: 3 mts and back: 4 meters) 3. The parking space for loading must be located as close as possible to the buildings service area, in order to avoid long distances 4. Studying the possibility of adding area without specific use to the land plot is requested, in order to expand the recreation area

Location SM-28-2: 1. General considerations will be taken into account 2. Comply with the spaces required in the standard (front: 6 mts, side: 3 mts and back: 4 meters) Location SM-28-3: 1. General considerations will be taken into account Location SM-28-4: 1. General considerations will be taken into account 2. The relocation of the parking lot next to the boundary is requested, as well as the relocation of the loading point next to the boundary, in order to allow a straight access to the building Location SM-29-1: 1. General considerations will be taken into account 2. The relocation of the parking lot next to the boundary is requested Location SM-29-2: 1. General considerations will be taken into account 2. The relocation of the parking lot toward the boundary with building A is recommended, as well as the redesign of the main access, the inclusion of an entrance square and a playground. 3. Comply with the spaces required in the standard (front: 6 mts, side: 3 mts and back: 4 meters) Location SM-29-3: 1. General considerations will be taken into account Location SM-29-4: 1. General considerations will be taken into account Location SM-30-1: 1. General considerations will be taken into account 2. The redesign of the parking lot is recommended, as well as the inclusion of an entrance square and a playground. Location SM-30-2: 1. General considerations will be taken into account 2. Comply with the spaces required in the standard (front: 6 mts, side: 3 mts and back: 4 meters)

Location SM-30-3: 1. General considerations will be taken into account 2. The relocation of the parking lot toward the boundary is recommended, as well as the redesign of the main access aligned to the building access, and designing an entrance square between the east and the parking lot. Location SM-30-4: 1. General considerations will be taken into account 2. Redesign the parking lot toward the boundary and design an entrance square Location SM-31-1: 1. General considerations will be taken into account 2. Redesign the parking lot in order to optimize the space for the recreation area Location SM-31-2: 1. General considerations will be taken into account 2. Redesign the parking lot in order to optimize the space for the recreation area 3. Moving the building 3 meters back is recommended, in order to create an entrance square Location SM-31-3: 1. General considerations will be taken into account Location SM-31-4: 1. General considerations will be taken into account BUILDING PROPOSAL FOR SIMONCITO Buildings space distribution: 1. The project is proposed with a level distribution, namely: GROUND FLOOR: Access area Restroom module for public use or for teachers Ten (10) nursery rooms, which consist of: classroom, recreation area, restroom for children and Kitchenette area. Kitchen Dining room Administrative area: principals office, secretarys office and waiting room. First aid Civic square Service module: electricity, gas and hydropneumatic system 01 stairway

FIRST FLOOR:

Restroom module for public use or for teachers Nine (09) kindergarten classrooms, which consist of: classroom, recreation area, restroom for children and Kitchenette area. C.B.I.T Kitchen Dining room Multipurpose room Two (02) offices Storage rooms 01 stairway

In this regard, the following observations and recommendations are proposed: Regarding the capacity of students to hold: 1. The preliminary design of the project as presented does not meet the required spaces to cover the proposed quantity of students, namely: 1.1. For functional reasons, the space distribution per educational level must be: Six (06) nursery rooms Twelve (12) kindergarten classrooms (In case of increase there will be three (03) more classrooms) 1.2. According to the area of each classroom, their maximum capacities must be: Sixteen (16) children per nursery room, for a total of ninety six (96) children Twenty-five (25) students per kindergarten classroom, for a total of three hundred (300) students 1.3. TOTAL QUANTITY OF STUDENTS TO HOLD: Three hundred ninety six (396) students Regarding the design: 1. For functional and operational reasons, the administrative area must be located as close as possible to the main access. 2. A second access and staircase must be included in order to guarantee a proper evacuation of the building in case it is required. 3. The building must have a ramp, to allow disabled people to enter the building. 4. It is not operational and recommendable to have two kitchens. Therefore, the elimination of the kitchen and dining room on the first floor is requested. The kitchen and dining room on the ground floor must be expanded. 5. The restroom and changing room for janitors was not included in the design. 6. The restroom module must be redesigned, since, according to the requirements, the access to the kitchenette must be separated from the restroom. Also, a cubicle for teachers must be included in the restroom module. 7. The washbasins for the use of nursery and kindergarten students must be embedded at a maximum height of sixty (60) centimeters from the finished floor. 8. A space for the mop sink must be included in each level

9. The dining room doors must open to the outside due to safety standards. 10. Studying the possibility of having a controlled exit from the recreation areas located on the ground floor to the external areas of the building is proposed. 11. There must be a pedestal for Simon Bolivars bust and the flagpole on the civic square. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Any arising doubts which are not clarified in this report must be referred to the manual of standards and recommendations for the design of educational buildings, prepared by the foundation of educational buildings and supplies, as well as the Ministry of Peoples Power for Education. CONCLUSIONS: AGREE DISAGREE X

The following is required: a. The incorporation of the changes and modifications described in this report is an indispensable requirement to grant conformity to the project. b. After making the corrections to the project, it must be submitted to this foundation again for the respective review. In the FEDE Project Management, we are at your service to provide advice, in order to comply with the standards and specifications for the design of educational buildings and thus, guarantee high quality physical facilities in accordance with the Bolivarian Educational System.

Arch. Nelly Ana Montaa Evaluator

Arch. Colomba Trotta Cabrera Evaluator

PROJECT REVIEW Architecture Responsible: BODY DESARROLLOS URBANOS DUCOLSA AND IRANIAN INTERNATIONAL HOUSING COMPANY Name of the project: Educational level or mode: Quantity of students: Location: PERSON

Review date: New construction X Evaluator: Replacement

Primary school project and proposals of five (5) locations for the Fabricio Ojeda New City Urban Project Primary education 1368 students Fabricio Ojeda New City, Integral Urban Development of The Rafael Urdaneta Socialist Ecological city, Lagunillas Municipality, State of Zulia October 21st 2013 Extension Location Restoration

Arch. Nelly Ana Montaa C.I.V.: 143.221 Colomba Trotta Cabrera C.I.V.: 82.289

Review No.:

001

One (01) folder containing information related to: Primary School Project for the Fabricio Ojeda New City Urban Project, in Lagunillas Municipality, Sate of Zulia was submitted to FEDE Project Management, by the representatives of: DESARROLLOS URBANOS DUCOLSA AND IRANIAN INTERNATIONAL HOUSING COMPANY, so that the documentation mentioned below undergoes the respective review: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Descriptive memory of the urban complex Urban drawings. It includes five (05) drawings Architecture descriptive memory Metric calculations Architecture drawings. It includes 31 drawings

In this regard, the following comments and recommendations are made:

LOCATIONS: General Considerations: 1. This review is made considering that the total capacity of the educational complex is 1368 students 2. According to the quantity of students proposed for the Primary School building, each complex must have two (02) sports courts: One (01) multi-use sports court and one (01) volleyball court. 3. The type of perimeter fence for each one of the locations must be defined. 4. Reduce the quantity of parking spaces to the minimum number established in the standard (twenty-five (25) parking spaces), in order to have greater green areas, recreational or sports areas for the use of the students. 5. At least one parking space for the use of disabled people with the proper signs for such purpose must be considered. 6. The access of service vehicles (food loading and unloading, waste, among others) must be defined. 7. The external areas and spaces must be designed, in order to use them as green areas, recreation or bench zones, for the enjoyment of students. 8. There must be a pedestal for Simon Bolivars bust and the flagpole on the civic square. Review of location EP-27-1: 1. General considerations will be taken into account 2. In accordance with the orientation of the building, they must have sunbreakers on the facades where the classrooms are located. 3. The elimination of one of the parking lot areas is proposed, in order to expand the green area and recreation areas Review of location EP-28-1: 1. General considerations will be taken into account Review of location EP-29-1: 1. General considerations will be taken into account 2. In accordance with the orientation of the building, they must have sunbreakers on the facades where the classrooms are located. Review of location EP-30-1: 1. General considerations will be taken into account Review of location EP-31-1: 1. General considerations will be taken into account 2. In accordance with the orientation of the building, they must have sunbreakers on the facades where the classrooms are located.

3. Locating the sports courts in the square between the two educational buildings is proposed, so that they have shared access BUILDING PROPOSAL FOR PRIMARY SCHOOL The following comments and recommendations are proposed: Regarding the capacity of students to hold: 1. According to the quantity of spaces presented in the Architecture proposal, the following is determined: 1.1. The primary school will have six (06) sections/grade x six (06) grades x 38 students/section 1.2. TOTAL QUANTITY OF STUDENTS TO HOLD: One thousand three hundred sixty eight (1368) students Regarding the design: 1. According to this quantity of students, the building must have the following teaching spaces: 1.1. Theory classrooms: Thirty-six (36) 1.2. Arts workshop: one (01) 1.3. 4th, 5th and 6th grade workshop: one (01) 1.4. Music workshop: one (01) 1.5. Computer workshop: one (01) 1.6. Information science and telematics bolivarian center: one (01) 1.7. Learning resource center (Library): one (01) 2. The inclusion of two (02) coordination offices additional to the proposed ones, as well as a teachers room. 3. For the kitchen area the following is requested: 3.1. One (01) food storage room 3.2. One (01) restroom for kitchen personnel 3.3. One (01) pantry 3.4. One (01) icebox 4. Expanding the dining room area is requested, for which, using the space of the Learning Resource Center (which is also proposed on the first floor) is recommended, and the multipurpose area replaces the culture space. 5. The doors of all teaching spaces must be located on the right end of the space, viewed from the access corridor. 6. The redesign of the restroom module is requested, considering the standards regarding: 6.1. Distance between sanitary pieces 6.2. Cubicle for the use of disabled people

6.3. Inclusion of eighteen (18) drinking fountains. The location of two (02) of them in an area near the dining room is requested. 6.4. Inclusion of at least one (01) mop sink per floor 6.5. The maximum height of the embedded washbasins is 0.80m. 7. The placement of one panoramic window in the restroom module is requested 8. The improvement of the proposal presented for the stairway is requested. 9. The windows of the teaching spaces must be panoramic ones, from column to column. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Any arising doubts which are not clarified in this report must be referred to the manual of standards and recommendations for the design of educational buildings, prepared by the foundation of educational buildings and supplies, as well as the Ministry of Peoples Power for Education. CONCLUSIONS: AGREE DISAGREE X

The following is required: a. The incorporation of the changes and modifications described in this report is an indispensable requirement to grant conformity to the project. b. After making the corrections to the project, it must be submitted to this foundation again for the respective review. In the FEDE Project Management, we are at your service to provide advice, in order to comply with the standards and specifications for the design of educational buildings and thus, guarantee high quality physical facilities in accordance with the Bolivarian Educational System.

Arch. Nelly Ana Montaa Evaluator

Arch. Colomba Trotta Cabrera Evaluator

PROJECT REVIEW Architecture Responsible: BODY DESARROLLOS URBANOS DUCOLSA AND IRANIAN INTERNATIONAL HOUSING COMPANY Name of the project: Educational level or mode: Quantity of students: Location: Review date: New construction X Evaluator: Replacement PERSON

High school location proposals for the Fabricio Ojeda New City Urban Project General secondary education 1330 students x 5: 6650 students (for that educational level) Fabricio Ojeda New City, Lagunillas Municipality, State of Zulia October 21st 2013 Extension Location Restoration

Arch. Nelly Ana Montaa C.I.V.: 143.221 Arch. Colomba Trotta Cabrera C.I.V.: 82.289

Review No.:

001

Information related to: Location proposals of five (05) high schools for the Fabricio Ojeda New City Urban Project, in Lagunillas Municipality, Sate of Zulia was received by FEDE Project Management, from the representatives of: DESARROLLOS URBANOS DUCOLSA AND IRANIAN INTERNATIONAL HOUSING COMPANY, so that the documentation mentioned below undergoes the respective review: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Descriptive memory of the urban complex Urban drawings. It includes five (05) drawings Architecture descriptive memory Metric calculations Architecture drawings. It includes 39 drawings

In this regard, the following comments and recommendations are made:

LOCATIONS: General Considerations: 1. According to the maximum capacity of the building, all the educational complexes proposed for high schools must have at least one (01) multi-use sports court, considering that it has an internal gym. 2. Define and present details of the perimeter fence 3. The parking lot must have at least one parking space for disabled people. It must also have one (01) loading /unloading point for the service area. 4. Consider the location of the flagpole and Bolivars bust in the internal civic square 5. The external areas and spaces must be designed, in order to use them as green areas, recreation or bench zones, for the enjoyment of students. Review of location ES-27-1: 1. General considerations will be taken into account 2. The building has the wrong orientation. In case that the dimensions of the land plot allow it, rotating the building 90 is suggested. Otherwise, the use of sunbreakers is requested. Review of location ES-28-1: 1. General considerations will be taken into account Review of location ES-29-1: 1. General considerations will be taken into account 2. Complying with the spaces from the boundary established in the standards is requested Review of location ES-30-1: 1. General considerations will be taken into account 2. The building has the wrong orientation. In case that the dimensions of the land plot allow it, rotating the building 90 is suggested. Otherwise, the use of sunbreakers is requested. Review of location ES-31-1: 1. General considerations will be taken into account 2. The building has the wrong orientation. In case that the dimensions of the land plot allow it, rotating the building 90 is suggested. Otherwise, the use of sunbreakers is requested. The main access to the complex must be located on the road with the lowest vehicular traffic. BUILDING PROPOSAL FOR HIGH SCHOOL Regarding the capacity of students to hold and the required spaces: 1. According to the quantity of spaces presented in the architecture proposal, the following is determined:

1.1. The high school will have 7 sections/year x 5 years x 38 students/section= 1330 students 2. According to this quantity of students, the building must have the following teaching spaces: 2.1. Theory classrooms from 1st to 3rd year: twelve (12) 2.2. Science theory classrooms: Five (05) 2.3. Humanities theory classrooms: Six (06) 2.4. Biology lab: four (04) 2.5. Physics lab: three (03) 2.6. Chemistry lab: three (03) 2.7. Earth science lab: one (01) 2.8. Work training workshop: five (05) 2.9. Technical drawing workshop: one (01) 2.10. Computer lab: one (01) 2.11. Endogenous workshop: Two (02) 2.12. Environmental education center: two (02) 2.13. Learning resource center (library): one (01) Regarding the design: 1. It is recommended that the labs and workshops of the same subject be together, in order to optimize the use of the services 2. The capacity of the Technical Drawing workshop is nineteen (19) students 3. In order to comply with the minimum quantity of sanitary pieces, six (06) urinals are needed. 4. The doors for teaching spaces must be located on the right side of such, viewed from the access corridor. 5. In terms of the previous item, the doors of teaching spaces must not face each other.

GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Any arising doubts which are not clarified in this report must be referred to the manual of standards and recommendations for the design of educational buildings, prepared by the foundation of educational buildings and supplies, as well as the Ministry of Peoples Power for Education. CONCLUSIONS: AGREE DISAGREE X

The following is required: a. The incorporation of the changes and modifications described in this report is an indispensable requirement to grant conformity to the project. b. After making the corrections to the project, it must be submitted to this foundation again for the respective review. In the FEDE Project Management, we are at your service to provide advice, in order to comply with the standards and specifications for the design of educational buildings and thus, guarantee high quality physical facilities in accordance with the Bolivarian Educational System.

Arch. Nelly Ana Montaa Evaluator

Arch. Colomba Trotta Cabrera Evaluator

REPORT Simoncito Structure Project to be built at the Fabricio Ojeda New City Urbanism, Zulia State Without confirmation SUBJECT: Request: Review of the Structure Project corresponding to the construction of a Simoncito to be executed in the Fabricio Ojeda New City Urbanism, located in Lagunillas Municipality, Zulia State, developed by DUCOLSA S.A and IRANIAN COMPANY 13-09-2013.

DATE:

Regarding the request made by State Coordination FEDE-Zulia we proceeded to evaluate the Structure Project corresponding to the construction of a Simoncito to be executed in the Fabricio Ojeda New City Urbanism, located in Lagunillas Municipality, Zulia State, developed by DUCOLSA S.A and IRANIAN COMPANY; in this regard we inform you that the same is not approved by this management, due to the fact that: 1. All documents must be written solely in Spanish language, considering that the same was submitted in English language. In case that the project is required in both languages, two sets one in Spanish one in English must be made. 2. In reports, drawings, specifications and any other documents the name of the Civil Engineer responsible for the project must be identified, as well as his respective registration number at the Venezuela Engineers Association (C.I.V in Spanish), ID number and signature. 3. It is required to submit all documents in hard copy (drawings, reports, calculations, quotations, etc., duly signed and stamped by the Civil Engineer responsible of the Project), and digital (it is recommended to scam the document for virus since the same could not be reviewed); as well as the review made by DUCOLSA and its respective approval. 4. The geotechnical study supporting the proposed infrastructure system is not included. 5. It is necessary to include the descriptive memory, where the material specifications (profiles to be used), type of protection for metallic elements, electrodes specifications, concrete dosage, formworking specifications are included as well as any other information required for the proper execution. 6. The location of joints between buildings is not shown, as it can be seen the effect of strong beam weak column. 7. It is required to include structural porticos, as well as connection details between structural elements. 8. In case of using materials with specifications different to the ones established in our standards, the warranty certificates must be submitted as well as the tests required by the Venezuelan Standards for the use of the referred material.

9. The nomenclature for the detailed of structural elements must be used as well as the naming of the elements as established in the Venezuelan Standards. Also all the dimensions and specifications of materials must be submitted in MKS system. It is important to emphasized that the school buildings are classified by the Antiseismic COVENIN 1756:2001 standard as essential and of vital operation under emergency conditions and its failure can result in numerous human losses (Referred to Pag. 22 Chapter 6) Technical Support Division.

REPORT Bolivarian School Structure Project to be built at the Fabricio Ojeda New City Urbanism, Zulia State Without confirmation SUBJECT: Request: Review of the Structure Project corresponding to the construction of a Bolivarian School to be executed in the Fabricio Ojeda New City Urbanism, located in Lagunillas Municipality, Zulia State, developed by DUCOLSA S.A and IRANIAN COMPANY 16-10-2013.

DATE:

Regarding the request made by State Coordination FEDE-Zulia we proceeded to evaluate the Structure Project corresponding to the construction of a Bolivarian School to be executed in the Fabricio Ojeda New City Urbanism, located in Lagunillas Municipality, Zulia State, developed by DUCOLSA S.A and IRANIAN COMPANY; in this regard we inform you that the same is not approved by this management, due to the fact that: 1. All documents must be written solely in Spanish language, considering that the same was submitted in English language. In case that the project is required in both languages, two sets one in Spanish one in English must be made. 2. In reports, drawings, specifications and any other documents the name of the Civil Engineer responsible for the project must be identified, as well as his respective registration number at the Venezuela Engineers Association (C.I.V in Spanish), ID number and signature. 3. It is required to submit all documents in hard copy (drawings, reports, calculations, quotations, etc., duly signed and stamped by the Civil Engineer responsible of the Project), and digital (it is recommended to scam the document for virus since the same could not be reviewed); as well as the review made by DUCOLSA and its respective approval. 4. The geotechnical study supporting the proposed infrastructure system is not included. 5. It is necessary to include the descriptive memory, where the material specifications (profiles to be used), type of protection for metallic elements, electrodes specifications, concrete dosage, formworking specifications are included as well as any other information required for the proper execution. 6. The location of joints between buildings is not shown, as it can be seen the effect of strong beam weak column. 7. It is required to include structural porticos, as well as connection details between structural elements.

8. In case of using materials with specifications different to the ones established in our standards, the warranty certificates must be submitted as well as the tests required by the Venezuelan Standards for the use of the referred material. 9. The nomenclature for the detailed of structural elements must be used as well as the naming of the elements as established in the Venezuelan Standards. Also all the dimensions and specifications of materials must be submitted in MKS system. It is important to emphasized that the school buildings are classified by the Antiseismic COVENIN 1756:2001 standard as essential and of vital operation under emergency conditions and its failure can result in numerous human losses (Referred to Pag. 22 Chapter 6) Technical Support Division.

REPORT High School Structure Project to be built at the Fabricio Ojeda New City Urbanism, Zulia State Without confirmation SUBJECT: Request: Review of the Structure Project corresponding to the construction of a High School to be executed in the Fabricio Ojeda New City Urbanism, located in Lagunillas Municipality, Zulia State, developed by DUCOLSA S.A and IRANIAN COMPANY 18-10-2013.

DATE:

Regarding the request made by State Coordination FEDE-Zulia we proceeded to evaluate the Structure Project corresponding to the construction of a High School to be executed in the Fabricio Ojeda New City Urbanism, located in Lagunillas Municipality, Zulia State, developed by DUCOLSA S.A and IRANIAN COMPANY; in this regard we inform you that the same is not approved by this management, due to the fact that: 1. All documents must be written solely in Spanish language, considering that the same was submitted in English language. In case that the project is required in both languages, two sets one in Spanish one in English must be made. 2. In reports, drawings, specifications and any other documents the name of the Civil Engineer responsible for the project must be identified, as well as his respective registration number at the Venezuela Engineers Association (C.I.V in Spanish), ID number and signature. 3. It is required to submit all documents in hard copy (drawings, reports, calculations, quotations, etc., duly signed and stamped by the Civil Engineer responsible of the Project), and digital (it is recommended to scam the document for virus since the same could not be reviewed); as well as the review made by DUCOLSA and its respective approval. 4. The geotechnical study supporting the proposed infrastructure system is not included. 5. It is necessary to include the descriptive memory, where the material specifications (profiles to be used), type of protection for metallic elements, electrodes specifications, concrete dosage, formworking specifications are included as well as any other information required for the proper execution. 6. The location of joints between buildings is not shown, as it can be seen the effect of strong beam weak column.

7. It is required to include structural porticos, as well as connection details between structural elements. 8. In case of using materials with specifications different to the ones established in our standards, the warranty certificates must be submitted as well as the tests required by the Venezuelan Standards for the use of the referred material. 9. The nomenclature for the detailed of structural elements must be used as well as the naming of the elements as established in the Venezuelan Standards. Also all the dimensions and specifications of materials must be submitted in MKS system. It is important to emphasized that the school buildings are classified by the Antiseismic COVENIN 1756:2001 standard as essential and of vital operation under emergency conditions and its failure can result in numerous human losses (Referred to Pag. 22 Chapter 6) Technical Support Division.

REPORT MECHANICAL AND SANITARY INSTALLATIONS Fabricio Ojeda New City Urban Project DAYCARE KINDERGARTEN (SIMONCITO) TO: ENG. MELBA MORENO

FROM: ENG. DIYURI SOLANO SUBJECT: Review of the Fabricio Ojeda New City Urban Project. MECHANICAL AND SANITARY INSTALLATIONS of DAYCARE-KINDERGARTEN (SIMONCITO), located in Lagunillas Zulia State. DATE: 25/11/2013 Due to request made by Project Management, the review of drawings and documents of project: Fabricio Ojeda New City Urban project MECHANICAL AND SANITARY INSTALLATIONS of DAYCARE-KINDERGARTEN (SIMONCITO), located in Lagunillas Zulia State was made. Documents and drawings reviewed: Calculation report, design criteria, metric calculations and mechanical and sanitary drawings. Documents: Design Criteria: Item 4.2 Potable water. is the minimum diameter to be used. Flushometer toilets are mentioned but there are only tanked toilets. In the calculation of supply dining room, kitchen, offices and green areas must be considered.

Drawings: Write in the drawing information box Mechanical and Sanitary Installations Drawings

2-BUD-DA-ME-100-R03: ADD IN LIST TITLE, Mechanical and Sanitary Installations Drawings.

It is considered that the project meets the requirements; in regards to sanitary installations it complies with the current Venezuelan Standards therefore the same is approved once these comments are included. Sincerely ENG. DIYURI SOLANO Technical Support Division Sanitary Installations REPORT MECHANICAL AND SANITARY INSTALLATIONS Fabricio Ojeda New City Urban Project PRIMARY SCHOOL TO: ENG. MELBA MORENO

FROM: ENG. DIYURI SOLANO SUBJECT: Review of the Fabricio Ojeda New City Urban Project. MECHANICAL AND SANITARY INSTALLATIONS of PRIMARY SCHOOL, located in Lagunillas Zulia State. DATE: 25/11/2013 Due to request made by Project Management, the review of drawings and documents of project: Fabricio Ojeda New City Urban project MECHANICAL AND SANITARY INSTALLATIONS of PRIMARY SCHOOL, located in Lagunillas Zulia State was made. Documents and drawings reviewed: Calculation report, design criteria, metric calculations and mechanical and sanitary drawings. Documents: Design Criteria: Potable water is the minimum diameter to be used. Flushometer toilets are mentioned but there are only tanked toilets. In the calculation of supply dining room, kitchen, offices and green areas must be considered.

Drawings:

Write in the drawing information box Mechanical and Sanitary Installations Drawings 2-BUD-DA-ME-100-R03: ADD IN LIST TITLE, Mechanical and Sanitary Installations Drawings.

It is considered that the project meets the requirements; in regards to sanitary installations it complies with the current Venezuelan Standards therefore the same is approved. Sincerely ENG. DIYURI SOLANO Technical Support Division Sanitary Installations REPORT MECHANICAL AND SANITARY INSTALLATIONS Fabricio Ojeda New City Urban Project HIGH SCHOOL TO: ENG. MELBA MORENO

FROM: ENG. DIYURI SOLANO SUBJECT: Review of the Fabricio Ojeda New City Urban Project. MECHANICAL AND SANITARY INSTALLATIONS of HIGH SCHOOL, located in Lagunillas Zulia State. DATE: 25/11/2013 Due to request made by Project Management, the review of drawings and documents of project: Fabricio Ojeda New City Urban project MECHANICAL AND SANITARY INSTALLATIONS of HIGH SCHOOL, located in Lagunillas Zulia State was made. Documents and drawings reviewed: Calculation report, design criteria, metric calculations and mechanical and sanitary drawings. Documents: Design Criteria: Potable water is the minimum diameter to be used. Flushometer toilets are mentioned but there are only tanked toilets. In the calculation of supply dining room, kitchen, offices and green areas must be considered.

Drawings: Write in the drawing information box Mechanical and Sanitary Installations Drawings 2-BUD-DA-ME-100-R03: ADD IN LIST TITLE, Mechanical and Sanitary Installations Drawings.

It is considered that the project meets the requirements; in regards to sanitary installations it complies with the current Venezuelan Standards therefore the same is approved. Sincerely ENG. DIYURI SOLANO Technical Support Division Sanitary Installations REPORT OF REVIEW TO: ENG. MELBA MORENO Technical Support Division

FROM: ENG. CARLOS GUEVAEA

SUBJECT:

REVIEW OF THE PROJECT. ELECTRICITY, Zulia State.

DAYCARE-KINDERGARTEN

(SIMONCITO)

DATE: 09/10/2013 Due to request made by Eng. Melba Moreno Chief of the Technical Support Division, we provide the answer to the request for reviewing the project: DAYCARE-KINDERGARTEN (SIMONCITO) ELECTRICITY, in Menito Sector, Maracaibo, Zulia State. The review is limited to the design of the lighting and force system, calculation report, data and sound. The project received is form by: Electrical installations 1. Calculation report 2. Metric calculation 3. Mechanical drawings (the information corresponds to electrical drawings) Cover Drawings list

 Comments

From 2-BUD-DA-EL-100-R02 until 2-BUD-DA-EL-121-R02

1. According to the reviewed and expressed in page three (3) of the calculation report they were prepared as per (Rural Electrification Administration) REA Bulletin 1751f-802 when it corresponds according to the National Electrical Code (CEN). 2. The installation of four (4) ceiling fans will result in a stroboscopic effect, it is necessary to relocate them in the drawing in order to avoid this effect, since the same interrupts concentration and reading activities. 3. The use of 3x17W 120V fluorescent lamps will create delays purchasing the 17W tubes at the time of their replacement, since they are not marketable in Venezuela.

Recommendations 1. Review calculations according to National Standards, in this case the (National Electrical Code) C.E.N, in order to verify that the calculations comply with minimum requirements of such code; otherwise the appropriate corrections must be made. 2. Change the proposal; installation of ceiling fans for wall fans in the classrooms. 3. Change the proposal; installation of 3x17W 120V fluorescent lamps for 2x32W 120V fluorescent lamps. Conclusions The adjustments mentioned in the recommendations must be applied to the project DAYCAREKINDERGARTEN (SIMONCITO) ELECTRICITY otherwise different solutions to the ones already proposed must be presented to FEDE Project management in order to evaluate the different solutions if there are any or their subsequent approval.

Eng Carlos Guevara Technical Support Division

PROJECT REVIEW REPORT SUBJECT: DATE: Review of the Project Primary School and High School 26/11/2013

It was proceeded to review the Electrical Installations Project:

Primary School (Bolivarian School) Calculation report, design criteria Electricity Metric calculations Electricity drawings

High School (Bolivarian High School) Calculation report, design criteria Electricity Metric calculations Electricity drawings

The project meets all the standards referred to electrical installations and calculation of the panel board conductors; however the voltage drop of each panel board must be corrected, since

according to the Area of Electrical Installations of FEDE Project Management, it uses a maximum of 2%. Note: Review load tables Annex descriptive memory of the project In the calculations annex the transformer bank and corresponding protections. T.S.U. William Vielma Project Management Electrical Installations