Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Supreme Court, being the highest judicial authority in the Philippines, has unique powers as a result of the country's bitter experiences in the past.
Supreme Court to afford greater protection to the individual's fundamental rights and guard against governmental abuses.
Those involving the constitutionality of a treaty, international or executive agreement, or law Those involving the constitutionality, application, or operation of presidential decrees, proclamations, orders, instructions, ordinances and other regulations Those required by the Rules of Court to be decided en banc The modification or reversal of doctrines laid down by the Court sitting in division or en banc
traditional exercise of judicial power - which is the settlement of conflicting legal rights - but also giving the judiciary the power to review the exercise of discretion by the political branches of government. Justice Cruz contends that the Supreme Court can now rule even on the wisdom of the president and congress's decision (political questions) if they are guilty of grave abuse of discretion. Former Constitutional Commission (body that drafted the 1987 Philippine Constitution) delegate Fr. Joaquin Bernas, however, was careful to point out in his book The 1987 Philippine Constitution: A Reviewer-Primer that the expanded definition of judicial power (also known as expanded certiorari jurisdiction) did not do away with the political question doctrine (the rule that courts cannot rule on the exercise of discretion by the political branches under the principle of separation of powers), but to prevent the judiciary from shying away in its duty to review acts of the executive and legislature at the mere invocation of the political question doctrine even when there is clear abuse in the exercise of power by these branches. At any rate, in Francisco, Jr. v. House of Representatives, the Supreme Court, in denying the plea for the Court not to review the impeachment proceeding brought before the House of Representatives against former Chief Justice Hilario Davide, Jr., has ruled that it is not only a power but a duty on the courts to rule on actions of the other branches of government whenever there has been a grave abuse of discretion in the exercise of their powers.
Congress, Section 5(5), Art. VIII of the Constitution grants the Supreme Court the power to promulgate rules concerning (1) the protection and enforcement of constitutional rights (2) pleading (3) practice (4) admission to the practice of law (5) the integrated bar (6) procedure in all courts, and legal assistance to the under-privileged.
Section 5 also provides that Congress may not reduce or deprive the foregoing jurisdiction of the Supreme Court as a guarantee to its independence.