Professional Documents
Culture Documents
.
.
.
.
Abestract:
This article present and compare two approachs for making
production mix decisions, Theory Of Constraints (TOC) and Marginal
Approach (MA). There are two trends, The first believe that TOC improves the
quality of decisions by providing the decision maker with a batter understanding
of activity constraints. The second think that it has partiality and it based on
some unfamillar accounting concepts. By emperical study we examined the
using liner programing evaluated how well both TOC and MA support position
decision making process and compared the advantages and disadvanges of two
approachs. We found that each approach offers unique features and benefits. We
believe that combined approachs provides a new method forimproving mix
decision
making.
:
Impediments
.
(Goldratt, 1993,
) p.18
.
.
.
.
.
Maximizing Throughput Reduce Inventory
:
: MRP1-
In
. Just
Goldratt
.
(Gardiner, et
Drum-Buffer-Rope
: Goldratt
.
. ) (Goldratt, 1990a, p.40
Activity Based
Costing
.
: Goldratt
).(Goldratt, 1993, pp.18-20
.5891 5891 5885
.5885
.
Throughput .
.
.
.
& (Luebbe & Finch, p1471-78 Noreen, Smith,
) Macky ,95
.
. (Tollington,
:
) .(Tollington, p.45
) (Kaplan, R. S., p.192 .
.
:
.
:
.
.
.
:
: .
: .
: .
.
.
. MRP1-
)(OPT
The Goal
) . (Goldratt & Cox, 1984
(Goldratt & Fox, The Race
) .1986
. Drum-Buffer-Rope
.
:
:
:
.
()
) .(Goldratt, 1988, P. 453
) .(Tollington, 44
Identify Decide
Subordinate Elevate The Constraint .
(Dugdale & Jones, 1996a,
) . pp. 24
.
.
Goldratt
.
:
.
.
.
2 The Goal of a business is to generate money
- -
.
.
.
1 Scheduling The Flow of products
through the supply Chain
. :
.
10
Goldratt . :
5 .
2 .
1 .
4 .
5 :
): (Goldratt, 1990b, P.5
: Physical
Managerial .
Goldratt .
Goldratt
- :
.
( ) .
.
.
. Throughput
.
:
- -
. Throughput
Throughput
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
) (TOC ()5 ()5
Overcome
Inertia
Identify
Constrai
nt
Elevate
Constraint
Subordinate all
Exploit
resources to
Constraint
global
decision
.
12
.
.
2 :
.
. Goldratt ) . Drum-Buffer-Rope (DBR
) .Time Buffers (T-Bs Drum
Buffer
. Rope
) Cox, 1991 :
Constraint Buffers :
13
.
Assembly Buffers:
Subassemblies
.
Shipping Buffers
.
( ) 2
()2
14
.
. .
Lead Time
.Throughput
- 1 :
Goldratt & Fox Software
) Optimized Production Technology (OPT
): (Goldratt & Fox, 1986, P.179
.
-
.
Utilization and Activation .
Just a mirage
15
):(Goldratt, 1993, pp.18-20
( )5 .
()5
Tree
Current Reality
Evaporative Cloud
Reality Tree
Prerequisite Tree
Future
Tree
Transition
Goldratt
.
- Evaporating clouds
Goldratt .
. Evaporating
) . (Dettmer,1998 Dettmer
.
. Home plate
16
) (EC ). ( APICS, p. 8
- : Reality Tree
Cause - and-Effect .
Roots
.
Current Reality Tree
() . Make Money
) Throughput (T ()
. .
) Inventory (I
. Goldratt
.
) Operating Expense (OE
. Goldratt
.
:
) Net Profit (NP
.
NP = T OE
17
. -
- .
Throughput
.
) (T ) . (I
.
:
-
= ) (T )(T
= ) (T )(OE
Goldratt
.
) (T
.
18
.
.
.
.
-
.
5 :
Goldratt
. .
).(Plenert & Best, 1986- Aggarwal, 1985 Everdell, 1984 Fox,1982a, 1982b
OPT
.
Goldratt
. ) (Swann, pp. 30-37
MRP OPT
. ) (Gelders & Van, p. 208
OPT
MRP . JIT
. ) (Plenert & Best, p.27 OPT JIT MRP
TOC .JIT
19
. TOC
2 :
. ( )Maskell, pp. 46
:
Lack of Relevance
Cost Distortion Inflexibility
.
.
. .
.
Goldratt .
20
) .(APICS, p. 2
! .
.
Goldratt
. :
- 5 .
.
!
. :
5 & (Gallaway
Elusive Dream
.
21
.
( )
!
Goldratt
- .
2 Goldratt
.
.
.
.
.
Goldratt
.
.
Goldratt
.
.
.
( )
22
. :
-
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
.
. -
.
.
. Goldratt
.
.
23
:
.
.
.
.
(
) :
5
.
. Throughput
2
.
.
.
24
.
.
. .
.
:
:
:
.
:
.
:
:
.
) (Goldratt & Cox, 1984-Goldratt & Fox, 1986
.
:
.
:
25
.
.
( )
. .
. ( )2
.
()2
22
21
( )
5222
222
5
5
2222
2222
() /
4
5
() /
1
4
() /
1
0
() /
5
4
12
42222
05222
04222
42222
: :
. () 21
() 22 .
.
.
. (.)1
()1
:
= 21 22 +
( )
4 + 42222
()
4 1 + 05222
26
()
()
:
0 1 + 04222
4 + 42222
( 5222 1
)
.
.
()1
:
8222 4222 +
121222
4222
8222
: :
. .
()4
()4
= 21 22 + ( 2222 -+5)2
: 5 2
( )
4 + 42222
27
()
4 1 + 05222
()
0 1 + 04222
( )
4 + 42222
2225
5222 - 2
()
5 2
() ()
4222 ( ) ( 22) 8222 () ( 8) .
292222 250222 ( .) 4
()
( )
( ).
()4
: () :
4222 8222 +
28( 22 8 + )
292222 250222
8222
4222
( )
.
.
91222
122 () . ( )1
.
28
()1
= 21 22 + ( 122 -+591222 - )2
: 5 2 122
91222
( )
4 + 42222
()
4 1 + 05222
()
0 1 + 04222
( )
4 + 42222
2225
5222 -2
()
5 2
(
) () ()
28 11 ( 42 0 + ).
122122 292122
588122 (.)1
()1
: () :
0122 0222 +
42( 11 0 +
) 122122
292122 588122
0122
29
0222
.
.
1
.
- :
30
:
.
.
.
Cumulative average-time learning model
.
. .
%92
0022 .
( )0 ()0
()0
22009
1
= 21 22 + ( 0025+5)2
: 5 2
7700
%92
( )
4 + 42222
()
4 1 + 05222
()
0 1 + 04222
( )
4 + 42222
2225
5222 - 2
()
5 2
()0
1
= ( 7700+5)2 229 2
31
22125829
: () :
0122 0222 +
42( 11 0 + )
122122 229181
0222
0122
() ( )0
588122 229181.
MS Excel
:
( )
() .
. () ()
.
.
() () .
- .
:
32
" " : . - 5
85-11 5898
" " : . - 2
250-228 5890
" " : . . - 1
.491-400 5882
34