Professional Documents
Culture Documents
but which only came from the lab shortly before the explosives
Page 2 of 7
All three proffer sessions were conducted with Attorney Howard.
when the defendant and his new Attorney, Mr. Wiberg, met with
Page 3 of 7
3553(e). There was significant discussion concerning what might
the Court previously, only days before the charges were brought
did the government get the confirming information from the lab
Jury.
1
The one and only time when a plea offer was made to the
defendant which required less than a plea to a 30 year sentence
was done after the government had advised, in open Court on
Tuesday, January 8, 2008 at the preliminary pretrial conference,
that it intended to present a Superseding Indictment to the
Grand Jury including the explosive charges the following day.
Page 4 of 7
is also clear that a Federal Court may dismiss an indictment if
citing United States v. Goodwin, 457 U.S. 368, 381, 102 S.Ct. at
2492.
even if they were true such would not be cause to dismiss the
Page 5 of 7
Id. at 109.
Lanoue, 137 F.3d 656 (1st Cir. 1998) the Circuit Court of Appeals
held:
Id. at 665.
Page 6 of 7
February 1, 2008 Respectfully submitted,
THOMAS P. COLANTUONO
United States Attorney
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
Page 7 of 7