Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
The main objective of this chapter is to assess the
quality of life in the villages of Uttar Pradesh and
suggest ways and means to improve the same. The
study followed a methodology of combining field visits,
intensive village studies using a case study approach,
analysing various documents collected from the
departments, focus group discussions with field officers
of the Government and the NGOs.
The results of the study are analysed and
discussed in the following structure. The chapter
presents an introduction about the state including
the demographic and other related parameters in
Section 6.2. This is followed by a review of
approaches in the Five -Year Plans in selected
sectors such as forest, land, agriculture, joint
forestry, drinking water and energy and rural
infrastructures in section 6.3. Section 6.4 provides
case studies with respect to nine villages selected
from across the state. The village study analysis
provides the summary of varying situations across
the states villages with insights into the development
with micro - level perspectives. Section 6.5 discusses
the government schemes and programmes launched in
Uttar Pradesh. The appendices provide the secondary
data analysis related to the various government projects
and programmes in the state, review of various
literature on the development of villages in India.
Chapter 6
Village Development
6.2. Status of Village Development
1
in Uttar
Pradesh: An Analysis
6.2.1 Agriculture Sector
Low Average Income Per Worker in Agriculture
Agriculture is the largest sector of the states
economy with its share being the highest both in the
state income as well as in employment. However, there
is a gross imbalance in these shares, and unlike the
other sectors of the states economy, its share in total
workers of the state is far higher than its share in state
income. As a result, the average income per worker of
this sector, with the largest workforce having to
support the largest section of population is far less
compared to the corresponding income per worker in
other sectors of the economy. The average income per
worker in the main sectors in 1991 is given below:
TABLE 6.1
Average Income Per Worker
Sector Income No. of Average Income
(Crores Rs.) Workers (Lakh) Per Worker (at
Current Prices
in Rs.)
Agriculture 20846.24 301.60 6,912
Manufacturing 6879.18 32.05 21464
Others 21770.82 79.96 27347
Total: 49496.24 413.61 11967
All Sectors
Source: Government of Uttar Pradesh, Tenth Five Year Plan (2002-2007) and
Annual Plan Vol.1 (Part 1) of Lucknow.
1. For the purpose of the study the sectors including land, water, agriculture, energy and physical infrastructure are undertaken from the secondary data collected
from various departments.
U
T
T
A
R
PRA
D
E
S
H
UTTAR PRADESH DEVELOPMENT REPORTVOL. 2
170
Stagnation in the Rate of Growth of Agriculture
It is well known that weather induced fluctuations
are a normal feature in agricultural production and the
rate of growth in the agriculture sector is influenced by
these fluctuations. But when these fluctuations are very
large, either because of droughts or floods, there is
always a risk that rates of growth for a particular period
do not always portray the correct picture depending
upon the extent of loss in agricultural production in
the base year or the terminal year of the period. The
rates of growth given above are for different periods,
covering a long span of time. If we look at the average
annual growth in agriculture in some of the recent Five
Year Plans, it was 2.7 per cent in the Sixth, Seventh
and Eighth Five Year Plans. There was, thus, a unique
stagnation in growth in agriculture at 2.7 per cent in
the recent past in these three consecutive Five-Year
Plans. Apart from stagnation in growth in agriculture,
a trend of a lower growth of less than 3 per cent in
agriculture continued to haunt the state in all these
years.
The dependence of the states economy on
agriculture, on the one hand, and the poor performance
of agriculture, on the other, is thus a matter of great
concern for the development of the state. It would
appear that either the efforts made for the development
of agriculture are not adequate and do not match the
requirement for such development or there are some
constraints on growth which are not being addressed or
the development in agriculture has reached a plateau
beyond which it is now incapable of growing in the
present scenario. These are some areas that require
careful investigation in order to chalk out suitable
strategies and policies for a higher and sustained
growth in agriculture. The fact that the present
schemes and policies for the development of agriculture
are not yielding a higher growth rate is clearly borne
out from the past experience and, therefore, instead of
continuing the same in future, there is a need to have
a well thought out, more comprehensive approach
comprising a series of well coordinated and mutually
supportive steps which can break the current
stagnation and boost up growth in agriculture. This is
where the proposed investigation must lead us to in
the course of developing future plans and make a
beginning for the same in the Tenth Plan.
Disguised Unemployment
A higher growth in agriculture is not all that is
needed to improve the states economy. The impact of a
higher growth in agriculture on its economy will not
be felt until it also leads to a raise in the income of the
agricultural workforce. Currently, this workforce is
much more than what is required for full and gainful
employment. It is an accepted fact that the size of the
surplus workforce is quite large, anywhere close to 30
per cent of the total workforce of this sector. This is
not a recent phenomenon. It has been there in the past
and has not undergone any significant change in all
these years. The workforce in agriculture in 1971 was
213 lakh, comprising 78 per cent of states total
workforce. In spite of surplus labour in this sector, the
workforce rose by 14 per cent to 243 lakh in 1981 and
by yet another 24 per cent to 302 lakh in 1991, with a
marginal decline of three percentage points only in the
states total workforce from 78 per cent (1971) to 75
per cent in 1981 and a little further to 73 per cent in
1991. But while these shares have gone down only
marginally, the fall in the share of agriculture in the
total state income has been far too steep.
Imbalance in the Distribution of
State Income vis--vis Agricultural Workers
Against a decline of a mere three percentage points
in its share in states total workforce between 1971 and
1981, the share of the sector in the state income fell by
seven percentage points in the same period, from 57 per
cent in 1971 to 50 per cent in 1981, and by 9 per cent
points in the following decades between 1980-81 and
1990-91, from 50 per cent to 41 per cent, against a far
smaller decline of only three percentage points in its
share in the states total workforce. Thus, while way
back in 1971, the contribution of agriculture to the
total state income was 57 per cent and its share in the
states workforce 78 per cent the same contribution
came down to 41 per cent 20 years later in 1991 with
its share in total workforce still at 72 per cent. This is
evidence of a trend of growing imbalance in the
distribution of the state income against agricultural
workers, which comprises about three-fourths of the
total workforce of the state and whose income levels
are, therefore, very material in creating a demand for
goods and services, the most effective stimulant to
growth in the economy. It is this workforce which
must be targeted more effectively in our development
policies, strategies and programmes so that the large
surplus and under employed among them shift in due
course, to more remunerative occupations, leaving
behind a workforce which the sector requires for full
and gainful employment.
The marginal decline in the shares of agriculture in
the states workforce, was accompanied by a very
substantial increase in the workforce of this sector, the
Chapter 6