International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 6340(Print),
ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 1, Number 1, July - Aug (2010), IAEME
182
EFFECTS OF CUTTING TOOL PARAMETERS ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS Tejinder pal singh Department of mechanical engineering SLIET, longowal
Jagtar singh Department of mechanical engineering SLIET, longowal
Jatinder madan Department of mechanical engineering SLIET, longowal
Gurmeet kaur Department of mechanical engineering GNE, ludhiana E-mail:- tejindergillz@gmail.com
ABSTRACT This paper presents a study of the inuence of tool rake angle, nose radius and clearance angle on surface roughness in turning operation using single point cutting tool. The well-known material, Aluminium was used for the experimentation. Mathematical models were developed from the data generated using full factorial technique. Significance of the coefficients and adequacy of the developed models has been checked using students t test and F test respectively at 95% confidence level. Developed models have been found to be adequate. The influences of cutting parameters have been presented in graphical form for better understanding. It was found from the present study that surface roughness decreases with the increase in rake angle and also increase with increase in the nose radius. Keywords: Rake angle, Nose radius, Aluminium, Mathematical model, Surface roughness.
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 1, Number 1, July - Aug (2010), pp. 182-189 IAEME, http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet.html IJMET I A E M E International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 1, Number 1, July - Aug (2010), IAEME
183 1 INTRODUCTION In order to produce any machine part at a certain quality by any metal removal technique, cutting parameters should be arranged properly. Dependent upon work piece material and geometry to be desired, surface roughness has important inuence on determining the machining cost related to nose radius, rake angle, clearance angle, cutting speed, feed rate, unformed chip thickness, cutting tool material etc. [1,6]. In metal removal operations, many researches were carried out in the past and many are continuing for the purpose of decreasing production cost without reducing product quality. It was seen in all works on surface roughness by chip removal methods that the surface roughness is directly inuenced by cutting parameters such as nose radius, clearance angle, cutting speed, feed rate, depth of cut, tool rake angle. [2].Cutting tools are insistently subject to pressure and opposing stresses during cutting even though their cutting edges are sufficiently sharp while machining metallic and non-metallic materials. Many researchers spent effort to determine optimum tool combination of rake angle and nose radius for better surface finish. Problems during cutting process have been reduced to an acceptable level by transferring computer knowledge for CNC turning machine. There have been many studies concerning the effect of cutting parameters (nose radius and rake angle) on the surface roughness. All results yielded from all these studies have been evaluated. [3] In this study, the inuence of tool rake angle nose radius on surface roughness was determined during machining of Aluminium material, which has well known physical, chemical and machinability properties. A computer numerical controlled (CNC) machine is used for machining a rod of aluminium material in the present study. [4] 2 EXPERIMENTAL SET UP The single point cutting tool trials were carried out using CNC Machine fitted with specially designed tool. The metal rod taken for investigation was aluminium having dimensions of 25mm diameter and length 80 mm was machined. The single point cutting tools with rake angle (in degree), clearance angle (in degree) and nose radius (millimeter) were used. The range of cutting tool parameters is shown in Table no. 1 [5]. The single International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 1, Number 1, July - Aug (2010), IAEME
184 point cutting tool was mounted on the tool post of CNC machine. The main objective is to optimize the parameters on turning operation for Surface roughness. [8] The design of experiment is a procedure of selecting the number of trials and a condition running them, essential and sufficient for solving a problem that has been set with the required precision. The use of design of experiment makes the behavior of investigator purposeful, organized and appreciably facilitates an increase in productivity of his work and reliability of results obtained. A two level factorial design of (2 3 = 8) eight trials, which is a standard statistical tool to investigate the effects of number of parameters on the required response, was selected for determining the effect of three independent direct tool parameters. The commonly employed method of varying one parameter at a time, though popular, does not give any information about interaction among parameters. The selecting of two level factorial designs also helped in reducing experimental runs to the minimum possible. The complete set of eight trials was repeated thrice for the sake of determining the variance of optimization parameter and once for variance of adequacy for this model. The experiments were performed in a random order in order to avoid any systematic error. The responses for the three set of experiments are given in Table no. 2.This experiments was performed in CAD/CAM lab. at SLIET, Longowal, Sangrur. Table 1 Cutting Tool parameters and their limits Parameters Units Symbol Upper limit Lower limit Rake angle Degree R 5 30 Nose radius Millimeter N .04 .08 Clearance angle Degree C 15 20 Table 2 Surface roughness of three sets Experiment No. SR 1
1 st Set
(m) SR 2
2 nd Set
(m) SR 3
3 rd Set
(m) 1. 1.780 1.834 1.708 2. 1.430 1.580 1.525 3. 0.769 0.827 0.860 4. 1.290 1.418 1.315 5. 1.180 1.080 1.250 6. 1.702 1.838 1.760 7. 0.615 0.745 0.620 8. 1.495 1.465 1.550 International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 1, Number 1, July - Aug (2010), IAEME
185 SR 1 = Surface Roughness of Set-I
SR 2 = Surface Roughness of Set-II SR 3 = Surface Roughness of Set-III
3. DEVELOPMENT OF MATHEMATICAL MODEL The response function representing surface roughness could be expressed as: Y = f (R, N, C) Assuming a linear relationship in the first instant and taking into account all possible two factors interactions only, the above could be written as; Y
= b o +b 1 R + b 2 N + b 3 C +b 12 RN + b 13 RC + b 23 NC ---------------------- (1) Where b 0 is
combined effect of all parameters and b 1 , b 2 , b 3 are main effects and b 12, b 13 , b 23 are interactive effect of two parameters. The regression coefficients of the selected model were calculated on basis of least square methods and shown in Table No. 3. Table 3 Regression coefficients for Surface roughness Coefficient Factor Value b 0 Combined effects of all factors 1.316 b 1 Rake angle (R) -0.212 b 2 Nose radius (N) 0.238 b 3 Clearance angle (C) 0.051 b 12 Interaction of R & N 0.127 b 13 Interaction of R & C 0.148 b 23 Interaction of N & C 0.053 3.1 Development of Final Models The statistical significance of the coefficients can be tested by applying studentst test. The level of significance of a particular parameter can be assessed by the magnitude oft value associated with it. After dropping insignificant coefficients, the developed models for surface roughness has been presented as Equation 2. Y SR = 1.316 -0.212R + 0.238N + 0.127RN + 0.148RC ------------------ (2) The adequacy of the developed models was tested using the analysis of variance technique. According to this technique, the calculated value of the F-ratio of the model developed should not exceed the standard tabulated value of F-ratio for a desired level (95% in this case) of confidence. Adequacy results has been shown in Table No. 4
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 1, Number 1, July - Aug (2010), IAEME
186 Table 4 Analysis of Adequacy Test Degree of Freedom Variance of Adequacy Variance of Response FRatio Model (F m ) F-Ratio Table(F t ) Adequacy of Model F N S 2 ad S 2 y F m = S 2 ad / S 2 y at 4, 8, 0.05 Whether F m < F t
4 8 0 .00475 0.00572 0.83 3.8 Yes 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The final proposed mathematical models for surface roughness as shown in equation no. 2.Mathematical models can be used to predict the effects of the various tool parameters on the surface roughness. In the mathematical model for the surface roughness, the effects of interaction of three parameters can be explained well. 4.1 Influence of Rake Angle on Surface Roughness The influence of rake angle on desired response has been observed from mathematical model at presented in Fig.1. It is observed from the Fig.1 that with increase in the rake angle, the surface roughness is decreases.
Figure 1 Effect of Rake Angle on Surface roughness 4.2 Influence of Nose Radius on Surface Roughness From the mathematical model for surface roughness, the relationship between surface roughness and nose radius is shown in Fig.2, it can be concluded that as the nose radius increases, the surface roughness also increases. It is because by increasing the nose radius, area of contact increases which in turn increases the friction and thus surface roughness increases. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 1, Number 1, July - Aug (2010), IAEME
187
Figure 2 Effect of Nose Radius on Surface roughness 4.3 Interaction effect of Rake Angle and Nose Radius on Surface Roughness The effects of Rake Angle and Nose Radius on Surface Roughness were observed from the Figure No.3. It can be concluded that by using lower value of nose radius and by increasing the rake angle, surface roughness will be decreased and surface finish is improved.
0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 -1 1 Rake Angle in coded form S u r f a c e
R o u g h n e s s
i n
m i c r o m e t e r -N +N
Figure 3 Interactive effects of Rake Angle and Nose Radius on Surface roughness 4.4 Interaction effect of Rake Angle and Clearance Angle on Surface Roughness The effects of Rake Angle and Clearance Angle on Surface Roughness were observed from the Figure. No.4. It is clear that surface roughness will be decreased i.e. surface finish will be improved with decrease in value of clearance angle and increase in value of rake angle. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 1, Number 1, July - Aug (2010), IAEME
188 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 -1 1 Rake Angle in coded form S u r f a c e
R o u g h n e s s
i n
m i c r o m e t e r
-C +C
Figure 4 Interactive effects of Rake Angle and Clearance Angle on Surface roughness
CONCLUSIONS Two Level Factorial Design is found to be effective tool to investigate the interaction effects of parameters on the required response. Surface Roughness decreases with increase in rake angle. The minimum value of surface roughness obtained is 1.104 m at rake angle of 30 0 and maximum value of surface roughness is 1.528 m at rake angle of 5 0 .Surface Roughness increases with increase in nose radius. The minimum value of surface roughness obtained is 1.078 m at nose radius of 0.04 mm and maximum value of surface roughness is 1.554 m at nose radius of 0.08 mm.
Surface roughness also decreases with the combined effect of rake angle & nose radius. The minimum value of surface roughness obtained is 0.739 m at nose radius of 0.04 mm and at rake angle of 30 0 and maximum value of surface roughness is 1.639 m at nose radius of 0.08 mm and at rake angle of 5 0 and combined effect of rake angle & clearance angle. The minimum value of surface roughness obtained is 0.956 m at clearance angle of 15 0
and at rake angle of 30 0 and maximum value of surface roughness is 1.676 m at clearance angle of 15 0 and at rake angle of 5 0 .
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 1, Number 1, July - Aug (2010), IAEME
189 REFERENCES 1. Korkut, M.A. Donertas, U. Seker, Three-dimensional dynamometer design and production, Zku, Karabuk, Technical Education Faculty, J. Technol. 2 (12) (1999) 115129. 2. Hasan Gokkaya , Muammer Nalbant , The effects of cutting tool geometry and processing parameters on the surface roughness of AISI 1030 steel, Materials and Design 28 (2007) 717721. 3. Zimmer and Groover, CAD/CAM Computer-Aided Design & Manufacturing, Pearson Education Ltd., 2006. 4. Degarmo, Materials and process of manufacturing, Printice Hall of India, 2003. 5. M.C. Shaw, Metal Cutting Principles, Oxford University Press, London, 1984. 6. J. Paulo Davim, A note on the determination of optimal cutting conditions for surface finish obtained in turning using design of experiments, JMPT 116 (2001) 305-308. 7. Thomas M., Beauchamp Y., Youssef A. Y., Masounave, Effect of tool vibrations on surface roughness during lathe dry turning process. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 4 (1996) 637-644. 8. Chang-Xue (Jack) Feng, An experimental study of the impact of turning parameters on surface roughness Proceeding of the 2001 Industrial Engineering Research Conference Copyright,2001, Institute of Industrial Engineers, paper no. 2036.