Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Breach of Trust Affidavit of Obligation (Fee Schedule)

    Uploaded by

    in1or
    4K views5 pages
    Breach of Trust Affidavit of Obligation (Fee Schedule) In the case of human bodies – ideas, labor, tissues, etc. – one can observe that the owners of these “commodities,” have exclusive prerogatives over the benefits that they can provide: • They can derive income from them in the form of capture at transaction time. • They can exclude others from using them. • They can also grant similar advantages to selected others. Therefore, until such time as a statute-enforcing police officer, magistrate, attorney, judge, sheriff, real estate agent, other public officer or any other agent and other so-called public officers all employees actually legitimize their actions by proving their case in a court of law that a man or woman is guilty of an alleged crime, that man or woman has every Right to “keep the meter running,” so to speak, by putting these people on notice that they have liability pursuant to a Fee Schedule. If the man or woman has put impersonating govt. on notice to the effect that a Fee Schedule is in place, and the people acting in their capacities as police, attorneys, etc., fail to challenge this notice within a specified time, then the man or woman is entitled to recovery of remedy for damages in spite of the outcome of any criminal proceeding that the public officers may initiate as a separate action. Most fundamentally, these rights to own our bodies as “property” and to engage in voluntary exchange are also basic common-law rights, and the two basic principles of voluntary capitalism. These principles are in accordance with the U.S. Constitution as intended by our Founding Fathers. The 5th Amendment states that no one may be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. “Where rights as secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which will abrogate them.” Miranda v. Ariz., 384 U.S. 436 at 491 (1966). The spirit of voluntary capitalism was expressed in this famous Supreme Court case, which reads: “The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty [to submit his books and papers for an examination] to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.” Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1906). Very few Americans (including lawyers) know that federal legislative and territorial jurisdiction is very limited. It is limited to the ten square miles of Washington District of Columbia, certain military bases where States have ceded jurisdiction, certain territories such as Puerto Rico and Guam, and certain Guano islands. Therefore, as soon as a man or woman can show that a police officer, magistrate, judge, sheriff, real estate agent, other public officer or any other agent, magistrate, etc., is working for the corporation d/b/a/ the Govt. of the U.S. incorporated in 1871, they have shown that those people do not have jurisdiction over the man or woman on the land in the various states of the union. “It is axiomatic that the prosecution must always prove territorial jurisdiction over a crime in order to sustain a conviction therefor.” U.S. v. Benson, 495 F.2d, at 481 (5th Cir., 1974).

    Original Title

    BREACH OF TRUST AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION (FEE SCHEDULE)

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Breach of Trust Affidavit of Obligation (Fee Schedule) In the case of human bodies – ideas, labor, tissues, etc. – one can observe that the owners of these “commodities,” have exclusive prerogatives over the benefits that they can provide: • They can derive income from them in the form of capture at transaction time. • They can exclude others from using them. • They can also grant similar advantages to selected others. Therefore, until such time as a statute-enforcing police officer, magistrate, attorney, judge, sheriff, real estate agent, other public officer or any other agent and other so-called public officers all employees actually legitimize their actions by proving their case in a court of law that a man or woman is guilty of an alleged crime, that man or woman has every Right to “keep the meter running,” so to speak, by putting these people on notice that they have liability pursuant to a Fee Schedule. If the man or woman has put impersonating govt. on notice to the effect that a Fee Schedule is in place, and the people acting in their capacities as police, attorneys, etc., fail to challenge this notice within a specified time, then the man or woman is entitled to recovery of remedy for damages in spite of the outcome of any criminal proceeding that the public officers may initiate as a separate action. Most fundamentally, these rights to own our bodies as “property” and to engage in voluntary exchange are also basic common-law rights, and the two basic principles of voluntary capitalism. These principles are in accordance with the U.S. Constitution as intended by our Founding Fathers. The 5th Amendment states that no one may be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. “Where rights as secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which will abrogate them.” Miranda v. Ariz., 384 U.S. 436 at 491 (1966). The spirit of voluntary capitalism was expressed in this famous Supreme Court case, which reads: “The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty [to submit his books and papers for an examination] to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.” Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1906). Very few Americans (including lawyers) know that federal legislative and territorial jurisdiction is very limited. It is limited to the ten square miles of Washington District of Columbia, certain military bases where States have ceded jurisdiction, certain territories such as Puerto Rico and Guam, and certain Guano islands. Therefore, as soon as a man or woman can show that a police officer, magistrate, judge, sheriff, real estate agent, other public officer or any other agent, magistrate, etc., is working for the corporation d/b/a/ the Govt. of the U.S. incorporated in 1871, they have shown that those people do not have jurisdiction over the man or woman on the land in the various states of the union. “It is axiomatic that the prosecution must always prove territorial jurisdiction over a crime in order to sustain a conviction therefor.” U.S. v. Benson, 495 F.2d, at 481 (5th Cir., 1974).

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4K views5 pages

    Breach of Trust Affidavit of Obligation (Fee Schedule)

    Uploaded by

    in1or
    Breach of Trust Affidavit of Obligation (Fee Schedule) In the case of human bodies – ideas, labor, tissues, etc. – one can observe that the owners of these “commodities,” have exclusive prerogatives over the benefits that they can provide: • They can derive income from them in the form of capture at transaction time. • They can exclude others from using them. • They can also grant similar advantages to selected others. Therefore, until such time as a statute-enforcing police officer, magistrate, attorney, judge, sheriff, real estate agent, other public officer or any other agent and other so-called public officers all employees actually legitimize their actions by proving their case in a court of law that a man or woman is guilty of an alleged crime, that man or woman has every Right to “keep the meter running,” so to speak, by putting these people on notice that they have liability pursuant to a Fee Schedule. If the man or woman has put impersonating govt. on notice to the effect that a Fee Schedule is in place, and the people acting in their capacities as police, attorneys, etc., fail to challenge this notice within a specified time, then the man or woman is entitled to recovery of remedy for damages in spite of the outcome of any criminal proceeding that the public officers may initiate as a separate action. Most fundamentally, these rights to own our bodies as “property” and to engage in voluntary exchange are also basic common-law rights, and the two basic principles of voluntary capitalism. These principles are in accordance with the U.S. Constitution as intended by our Founding Fathers. The 5th Amendment states that no one may be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. “Where rights as secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which will abrogate them.” Miranda v. Ariz., 384 U.S. 436 at 491 (1966). The spirit of voluntary capitalism was expressed in this famous Supreme Court case, which reads: “The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty [to submit his books and papers for an examination] to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.” Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1906). Very few Americans (including lawyers) know that federal legislative and territorial jurisdiction is very limited. It is limited to the ten square miles of Washington District of Columbia, certain military bases where States have ceded jurisdiction, certain territories such as Puerto Rico and Guam, and certain Guano islands. Therefore, as soon as a man or woman can show that a police officer, magistrate, judge, sheriff, real estate agent, other public officer or any other agent, magistrate, etc., is working for the corporation d/b/a/ the Govt. of the U.S. incorporated in 1871, they have shown that those people do not have jurisdiction over the man or woman on the land in the various states of the union. “It is axiomatic that the prosecution must always prove territorial jurisdiction over a crime in order to sustain a conviction therefor.” U.S. v. Benson, 495 F.2d, at 481 (5th Cir., 1974).

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 5

    International Registered Mail Number:

    BREACHOFTRUST
    AFFIDAVITOFOBLIGATION(FEESCHEDULE)
    Remedy;Trustee(s),agent(s)FeeScheduleandInvoice(Billing)
    Statement;includingbutnotlimitedtothisschedule:
    (1)TrespassonCestuiQueTrustmatter(s)andtrustproperty,including
    anytrustpropertyimpairedasaresultofanyactiontakenwithout
    consent.10,000insilverdollarcoinconvertibleatthelegaland
    lawfulratioprescribedbylawof24:1ofFederalreservenotesto
    silverdollarspertrespassperperson.
    (2)Trustee(s),agent(s)Correspondencenotsignedinaffidavitform
    (underpenaltiesofperjury,commercialliability).10,000insilver
    dollarcoinconvertibleatthelegalandlawfulratioprescribedbylaw
    of24:1ofFederalreservenotestosilverdollarspercommunication
    notincompliance.
    (3)Trustee(s),agent(s)Foreclosure,Repossession,CourtMatters
    againstCestuiQueTrust10,000insilverdollarcoinconvertibleatthe
    legalandlawfulratioprescribedbylawof24:1ofFederalreserve
    notestosilverdollars.
    (4)Trustee(s),agent(s)TakingofanyCestuiQueTrustpropertythru
    force,duress,coercion,conversion(includingbutnotlimitedto
    arrest/kidnapping)10,000insilverdollarcoinconvertibleatthelegal
    andlawfulratioprescribedbylawof24:1ofFederalreservenotesto
    silverdollarsperoccurrence.
    (5)SelfExecutingLeaseAgreement(contract)createduponthetaking
    thruforce,duress,coercion,conversionofanyCestuiQueTrust
    property10,000insilverdollarcoinconvertibleatthelegaland
    lawfulratioprescribedbylawof24:1ofFederalreservenotesto
    silverdollarslease/perdayoutofpossessionofbeneficiary.
    (6)Trustee(s),agent(s)Harassmentafternotice$10,000insilver
    dollarcoinconvertibleatthelegalandlawfulratioprescribedbylaw
    of24:1ofFederalreservenotestosilverdollarsperoccurrence.
    (7)Trustee(s),agent(s)Violation(s);BreachofClose,BreachofTrust,
    BreachofContract,BreachofthePeace,Perjury)ofoath(s)/oath(s)of
    officeofTrustee(s)FalseSwearingandactingWithoutAuthority.
    10,000insilverdollarcoinconvertibleatthelegalandlawfulratio
    prescribedbylawof24:1ofFederalreservenotestosilverdollars
    perpersonperviolation.
    (8)Trustee(s),agentsFalseStatements10,000insilverdollarcoin
    convertibleatthelegalandlawfulratioprescribedbylawof24:1of
    Federalreservenotestosilverdollarsperperson,perfalsestatement.
    (9)Trustee(s),agent(s)ImpairmentofContracts10,000insilverdollar
    coinconvertibleatthelegalandlawfulratioprescribedbylawof24:
    1ofFederalreservenotestosilverdollarsuserfee,perperson,per
    impairment.

    International Registered Mail Number:

    (10)Trustee(s),agent(s)Violationofanyunalienablerights
    includingbutnotlimitedtoallrightsprotectedbyTrusts,TrustLaw,
    Law,CommonLaw,InternationalLaw,Constitutions,LawofNations,etc.
    10,000insilverdollarcoinconvertibleatthelegalandlawfulratio
    prescribedbylawof24:1ofFederalreservenotestosilverdollars
    userfee,perviolation,perperson.
    NOTARYorNOTARYPUBLICdefined:Anofficerappointedbytheexecutive,
    orotherappointingpower,underthelawsofdifferentstates.2.Their
    dutiesaregenerallyprescribedbysuchlaws.Themostusualofwhich
    are,l.Toattestdeeds,agreementsandotherinstruments,inorderto
    givethemauthenticity.2.Toprotestnotes,billsofexchange,andthe
    like.3.Tocertifycopiesofagreementsandotherinstruments.3.By
    actofcongress,Sept.16,1850,Minot'sStatutesatLarge.U.S.458,
    itisenacted,That,inallcasesinwhich,underthelawsoftheUnited
    States,oaths,oraffirmations,oracknowledgmentsmaynowbetakenor
    madebeforeanyjusticeorjusticesofthepeaceofanystateor
    territory,suchoaths,affirmations,oracknowledgmentsmaybehereafter
    alsotakenormadebyorbeforeanynotarypublicdulyappointedinany
    stateorterritory,and,whencertifiedunder,thehandandofficial
    sealofsuchnotary,shallhavethesameforceandeffectasiftakenor
    madebyorbeforesuchjusticeorjusticesofthepeace.Andalllaws
    andpartsoflawsforpunishingperjury,orsubornationofperjury,
    committedinanysuchoathsoraffirmations,whentakenormadebefore
    anysuchjusticeofthepeace,shallapplytoanysuchoffencecommitted
    inanyoathsoraffirmationswhichmaybetakenunderthisactbeforea
    notarypublic,orcommissioner,ashereinafternamed:Providedalways,
    Thatonanytrialforeitheroftheseoffences,thesealandsignature
    ofthenotaryshallnotbedeemedsufficientinthemselvestoestablish
    theofficialcharacterofsuchnotary,butthesameshallbeshownby
    otherandproperevidence.4.Notaries,areofveryancientoriginthey
    werewellknownamongtheRomans,andexistineverystateofEurope,
    andparticularlyonthecontinent.5.Theiractshavelongbeen
    respectedbythecustomofmerchantsandbythecourtsofallnations.6
    Toull.n.211,note.Vide,generally,Chit.Bills,Index,h.t.;Chit.
    Pr.Index,,h.t.;Burn'sEccl.Law,h.t.;Bro.Off.ofaNot.passim;
    2Har.&John.396;7Verm.22;8Wheat.326;6S.&R.484;1Mis.R.
    434.ByactofAug.15,1876,c.304,notariesareauthorizedtotake
    depositionsanddoallotheractsinrelationtotakingtestimonytobe
    usedinthecourtsoftheUnitedStates,andtotakeacknowledgmentsand
    affidavitswiththesameeffectascommissionersoftheUnitedStates
    circuitcourtsmaydo.R.S.1778.Theymayprotestnationalbank
    circulatingnotes;R.S.5226;takeacknowledgmentofassignmentof
    claimsupontheUnitedStates;id.3477;andadministeroathsof
    allegiancetopersonsprosecutingsuchclaims;id.3479.ByactofJune
    22,1874,c.390,notariesmaytakeproofofdebtsagainsttheestateof
    abankrupt.Theactsofnotariesarerespectedbythecustomof
    merchantsandthelawofnations.Theirprotestofabillisreceivedas
    evidenceinthecourtsofallcivilizedcountries.ALawDictionary
    AdaptedToTheConstitutionAndLawsOfTheUnitedStatesOfAmericaAnd
    OfTheSeveralStatesOfTheAmericanUnionby:JohnBouvierRevised
    SixthEdition,1856

    International Registered Mail Number:

    SuiJuris,knownas:John,ofthegenealogyofDoe,freebornspiritual
    beingonthelandstatethefactscontainedhereinaretrue,correct,
    complete,andnotmisleading,tothebestofmypersonalfirsthand
    knowledgeandbelief.Beingofsoundmind,competent,overtheageof
    18.Thismyfreewill,voluntaryactanddeedtomake,execute,seal,
    acknowledgeanddeliverundermyhandandsealwithexplicitreservation
    ofallmyunalienablerightsandmyspecificcommonlawrightnottobe
    boundbyanycontractorobligationwhichIhavenotenteredinto
    knowingly,willingly,voluntarily,andwithoutmisrepresentation,
    duress,orcoercion,wherebyIdidnotsignnorconsent.Iamnotnow
    norhaveeverbeenaCITIZENnoraU.S.CitizennoraFourteenth
    AmendmentFederalCitizennorEmployee,Iamnotboundbyswornoathor
    oathofoffice.WhereasIherebydisclaimClausesOneandTwoofSection
    OnetotheFourteenthAmendment,togetherwithArticleFourSection
    ThreeClauseTwo.Idoherebycertify,verify,state,claimanddeclare
    foreverwithoutabandonment;RealProperty(onEarth);PersonalProperty
    (body);andEcclesiasticalProperty(soul)togetherwithalltrusts,
    probate,rights,titles,interestsdroit,droitbothabsoluteand
    contingent,WithouttheU.S.Shouldthisnotbetruethenletthe
    recordbecorrectedoritwillstandastruth.Timeisoftheessence.

    Veracity;InmyPrivateCapacityasGeneralExecutor/Eecutrixofsaid
    CestuiQueTrustaccountDroit,Droit,ThisservesNoticethatyour
    offerhasbeenAcceptedasValuableConsiderationandReturnedfor
    Value.ThispropertyisExemptfromLevy.PleaseAdjustthisAccountfor
    theProceeds,Products,AccountsandFixturesandReleaseTheOrder(s)
    ofTheCourttoMeImmediately.Makeadjustmentandclosethisaccount
    immediately,withprejudice.IacceptyourOath,OathofOfficeSecurity
    Agreement,Constitutionsasbylaws,andMalfeasanceBondandplaceyou
    inthePrivatecommencingthisselfexecutingbindingcontractbetween
    youandI.Further,IappointyoutrusteeFullyPersonallyLiable
    NowonyourhonorandsolemnOathtoperformyourobligationsand
    dutiestoProtectMyunalienableRightsinyourFiduciaryCapacity
    againstanyandallclaims,legalactions,orders,warrants,judgments,
    demands,liabilities,losses,foreclosure,depositions,summonses,
    lawsuits,costs,fines,liens,levies,penalties,taxes,damages,
    interests,andexpenseswhatsoever,bothabsoluteandcontingent,asare
    dueandasmightbecomedue,nowexistingandasmighthereafterarise,
    andasmightbesufferedby,imposedon,andincurredbyDebtorforany
    andeveryreason,purpose,andcausewhatsoever.PleasehonorObligation
    ofGoodFaithinPerformanceofyourDuties.QuidProQuos,anequal
    exchangeorsubstitution.

    Thismyfreewill,voluntaryactanddeedtrueandlawfulattorneyin
    facttomake,execute,seal,acknowledgeanddeliverundermyhandand
    seal,explicitlyreservingallrightswithoutprejudice;

    By:__________________________________________
    SuiJurisknownas;JohnofthegenealogyofDoeBailorforJOHNDOEBailee

    ___________________________________________
    Probatioplena;Ran,RoeThirdPartyWitness
    "Sealedanddeliveredinthepresenceofus."

    International Registered Mail Number:

    ___________________________________________
    Probatioplena;James,RoeThirdPartyWitness
    "Sealedanddeliveredinthepresenceofus."

    NOTICE: Public acts defined: are those which have a public authority, and which have been made before public officers, are
    authorized by a public seal, have been made public by the authority of a magistrate, or which have been extracted and been properly
    authenticated from public records. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 26)

    STATE OF ILLINOIS )
    ) SS:
    COUNTY OF COOK )
    CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    On this date the individual named above, in his/her stated capacity, personally appeared before me to
    execute this acknowledgement that this instrument was signed, sealed, and delivered as their free will,
    voluntary act and deed to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver under their hand and seal verified
    and authenticated for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
    _____________________
    DATE
    AFFIX
    NOTARY SEAL
    IF REQUIRED

    _________________________________
    Signature of NOTARY PUBLIC
    Date Commission Expires __________________

    International Registered Mail Number:

    SampleReturnto:GeneralPostOfficeLetter
    ToWhomItMayConcern:
    Pleasekindlycorrectyourrecordstoreflectreturnlocation:
    Returnto:
    SuiJurisknownasJohnofthegenealogyofDoe
    GeneralPostOffice
    c/oMainPostOfficeNonDomestic
    TucsonArizonaunitedStatesofAmerica(U.S.A.)
    withouttheU.S.
    SincetheuseofZIPisnotrequired(seezipnotrequired[DMM6021.3e(2)]
    DomesticMailManualServiceRegulations,theU.S.PostalServicecannot
    discriminateagainstthenonuseofZIPcodes,pursuanttothePostal
    ReorganizationAct,Section403(PublicLaw91375). TheU.S.attemptsto
    assertjurisdictionbysendingletterswithZIPcodes,whenjurisdictionwould
    otherwisebelacking.Thereceiptand"acceptance"ofmailwithZIPcodesisone
    ofthepresumptionsfortheInternalRevenueService,inparticular,topresume
    jurisdictiontosendnotices.Infact,theIRShasadoptedZIPcodeareasas
    "InternalRevenueDistricts."SeetheFederalRegister,Volume51,Number53,
    forWednesday,March19,1986.
    TheU.S.Corp.cannotbillanonU.S.CitizenbecausesuchanonU.S.Citizenis
    notwithinthepurviewoftheDistrictofColumbia,itsJurisdiction,
    territories,possessionsorenclaves.Asagroup,theseareasarenowuniquely
    andcollectivelyidentifiedas"thefederalzone,"asexplainedinthebook
    entitledTheFederalZone:CrackingtheCodeofInternalRevenue,SanRafael,
    AccountforBetterCitizenship,1992.Yourimmediatecooperationinthismatter
    willbemostappreciated.
    Thankyouinadvanceforyourcooperationandunderstanding.
    Thismyfreewill,voluntaryactanddeedtrueandlawfulattorneyinfactto
    make,execute,seal,acknowledgeanddeliverundermyhandandseal,explicitly
    reservingallrightswithoutprejudice;

    By:__________________________________________
    SuiJurisknownas;JohnofthegenealogyofDoeBailor

    You might also like