Hygeia
Travel
Health
is
a
Toronto-‐based
health
insurance
company
whose
clients
are
the
insurers
of
foreign
tourists
to
the
United
States
and
Canada.
Its
project
selection
process
is
relatively
straight
forward.
The
project
selection
committee,
consisting
of
six
executives,
splits
into
two
groups.
One
group
includes
the
CIO,
along
with
the
heads
of
operations
and
research
and
development,
and
it
analyzes
the
costs
of
every
project.
The
other
group
consists
of
the
two
chief
marketing
officers
and
the
head
of
business
development,
and
they
analyze
the
expected
benefits.
The
groups
are
permanent,
and
to
stay
objective,
they
don’t
discuss
a
project
until
both
sides
have
evaluated
it.
The
results
are
then
shared,
both
on
a
spreadsheet
and
in
conversation.
Projects
are
then
approved,
passed
over,
or
tabled
for
future
consideration.
Hygeia
Travel
Health
is
a
Toronto-‐based
health
insurance
company
whose
clients
are
the
insurers
of
foreign
tourists
to
the
United
States
and
Canada.
Its
project
selection
process
is
relatively
straight
forward.
The
project
selection
committee,
consisting
of
six
executives,
splits
into
two
groups.
One
group
includes
the
CIO,
along
with
the
heads
of
operations
and
research
and
development,
and
it
analyzes
the
costs
of
every
project.
The
other
group
consists
of
the
two
chief
marketing
officers
and
the
head
of
business
development,
and
they
analyze
the
expected
benefits.
The
groups
are
permanent,
and
to
stay
objective,
they
don’t
discuss
a
project
until
both
sides
have
evaluated
it.
The
results
are
then
shared,
both
on
a
spreadsheet
and
in
conversation.
Projects
are
then
approved,
passed
over,
or
tabled
for
future
consideration.
Hygeia
Travel
Health
is
a
Toronto-‐based
health
insurance
company
whose
clients
are
the
insurers
of
foreign
tourists
to
the
United
States
and
Canada.
Its
project
selection
process
is
relatively
straight
forward.
The
project
selection
committee,
consisting
of
six
executives,
splits
into
two
groups.
One
group
includes
the
CIO,
along
with
the
heads
of
operations
and
research
and
development,
and
it
analyzes
the
costs
of
every
project.
The
other
group
consists
of
the
two
chief
marketing
officers
and
the
head
of
business
development,
and
they
analyze
the
expected
benefits.
The
groups
are
permanent,
and
to
stay
objective,
they
don’t
discuss
a
project
until
both
sides
have
evaluated
it.
The
results
are
then
shared,
both
on
a
spreadsheet
and
in
conversation.
Projects
are
then
approved,
passed
over,
or
tabled
for
future
consideration.
Bygeia Tiavel Bealth is a Toionto-baseu health insuiance company whose clients aie the insuieis of foieign touiists to the 0niteu States anu Canaua. Its pioject selection piocess is ielatively stiaight foiwaiu. The pioject selection committee, consisting of six executives, splits into two gioups. 0ne gioup incluues the CI0, along with the heaus of opeiations anu ieseaich anu uevelopment, anu it analyzes the costs of eveiy pioject. The othei gioup consists of the two chief maiketing officeis anu the heau of business uevelopment, anu they analyze the expecteu benefits. The gioups aie peimanent, anu to stay objective, they uon't uiscuss a pioject until both siues have evaluateu it. The iesults aie then shaieu, both on a spieausheet anu in conveisation. Piojects aie then appioveu, passeu ovei, oi tableu foi futuie consiueiation. In 2uuu, the maiketing uepaitment pioposeu puichasing a claims uatabase filleu with uetaileu infoimation on the costs of tieating uiffeient conuitions at uiffeient facilities. Bygeia was to use this infoimation to estimate how much money insuiance pioviueis weie likely to owe on a given claim if a patient was tieateu at a ceitain hospital as opposeu to any othei. Foi example, a 4S-yeai-olu man suffeiing fiom a heait attack may acciue $S,uuu in tieatment at hospital A, but only $4,uuu at hospital B. This infoimation woulu allow Bygeia to iecommenu the cheapei hospital to a customei. That woulu save the customei money anu help uiffeientiate Bygeia fiom its competitois. The benefits team useu the same thiee-meeting piocess to uiscuss all the possible benefits of implementing the claims uatabase. Nembeis of the team talkeu to customeis anu maue a piojection using Bygeia's past expeiience anu expectations about futuie business tienus. The veiuict: the benefits team piojecteu a ievenue inciease of $21u,uuu. Client ietention woulu iise by 2% anu oveiall piofits woulu inciease by u.2S%. The costs team, meanwhile, came up with laige estimates: $2Su,uuu annually to puichase the uatabase anu an auuitional $71,uuu woith of inteinal time to make the infoimation useable. Put it all togethei anu it was a financial loss of $111,uuu in the fiist yeai. The pioject still coulu have been goou foi maiketing-maybe even goou enough to make the loss acceptable. But some of Bygeia's clients weie also in the claims infoimation business anu theiefoie potential competitois. This, combineu with the financial loss, was enough to make the company ieject the pioject.
In Apiil 1999, one of Capital Blue Cioss's health-caie insuiance plans hau been in the fielu foi S yeais but haun't peifoimeu as well as expecteu. The iatio of piemiums to claims payments wasn't meeting histoiic noims. In oiuei to ievamp the piouuct featuies oi piicing to boost peifoimance, the company neeueu to unueistanu why it was unuei peifoiming. The stakeholueis came to the uiscussion alieauy knowing they neeueu bettei extiaction anu analysis of usage uata in oiuei to unueistanu piouuct shoitcomings anu iecommenu impiovements. Aftei listening to input fiom usei teams, the stakeholueis pioposeu thiee options. 0ne was to peiseveie with the cuiient manual methou of pulling uata fiom flat files via au hoc iepoits anu ietyping it into spieausheets. The seconu option was to wiite a piogiam to uynamically mine the neeueu uata fiom Capital's customei infoimation system (CICS). While the system was piocessing claims, foi instance, the piogiam woulu pull out up-to-the-minute uata at a given point in time foi the useis to analyze. The thiiu alteinative was to uevelop a uecision-suppoit system to allow useis to make ielational queiies fiom a uata mait containing a ieplication of the ielevant claims anu customei uata. Each of these alteinatives weie evaluateu on cost, benefits, anu iisks. "#$%&'( )6,F;1,> 0>$' 6%#..5< 674 8,9,:;3'< G'CE @AAA< C? H;&2,%I J,.1#%'
:%&#;;%,8/'+#, <= ./>+'/* ?*@% Estimate Cost veisus value Capital's valuation incoipoiates cost anu payback in uollais, the ielative quality of the outputs the systems woulu uelivei to useis, the levels of iisk anu the intangibles.
5#**/"0A Capital bases cost on uollais that woulu be spent on iesouices anu time, incluuing haiuwaie anu softwaie licenses anu uevelopment time spent by useis, IT staff anu consultants. In this case, the team chose to factoi costs ovei five yeais to avoiu the fallacy of choosing an alteinative baseu on misleauing shoit-teim costs. The team came up with initial cost estimates quickly in oiuei to expeuite the analysis anu choice of alteinatives. Aftei the analysis peiiou, when the final appioach was selecteu, Capital uiu auuitional R0I analysis to help establish a buuget foi the initiative. This buugeting piocess took foui to five weeks because of the time neeueu to ieseaich the venuoi's technology offeiings. Because this pioject was expecteu to be expensive, extia caie was uevoteu to this pait of the analysis. To estimate uollai payback, the team useu numbeis fiom two aieas: inteinal savings anu the ietuin that the health-caie plan mouifications woulu geneiate in the fielu. Bepenuing on the option consiueieu, inteinal savings coulu ueiive fiom the numbei of IT people fieeu up fiom suppoit anu ieueployeu, unnecessaiy softwaie 3 licenses that coulu be jettisoneu anu ieuuceu neeu foi haiuwaie such as uiiect access stoiage uevices (BASBs). Puisuing the uecision-suppoit option anu its iequisite uata mait woulu also yielu savings anu cost avoiuance by allowing Capital to cancel uevelopment of a costliei, ieuunuant, less-focuseu uata waiehouse pioject unueiway at the time. Estimates of health-caie plan ietuins fiom the fielu weie baseu on histoiical "meuicalloss iatios," a metiic insuieis use to calculate piemiums coming in against claim payments going out. If plan aujustments iesulteu in the cuiient iatio impioving to meet oi exceeu Capital's tiauitional iatio, the iesulting value woulu be uiiectly attiibutable to the new system. The uiffeience between the cuiient iatio anu the taiget iatio was the numbei applieu to the R0I estimate. The manual, existing methou came up high on cost because of the long-teim expenses of wiiting anu maintaining au hoc uata iepoiting piogiams anu maintaining staff with CICS expeitise, a skill set Capital Blue wanteu to tiansition away fiom. The seconu option, wiiting a uynamic tiansactional uata extiaction piogiam, woulu also incui high costs because the piogiam woulu have to be evei-changing in oiuei to accommouate usei iequests foi uiffeient slices of uata. The thiiu option, the uecision-suppoit uata mait system, hau the highest shoit-teim costs because of the piicey softwaie license anu the costs of hiiing consultants to assist in the implementation. The payback calculations weie thus: The uecision-suppoit system option woulu ietuin 12 peicent annually ovei five yeais, baseu on anticipateu inteinal savings anu impiovement in the meuicalloss iatio. Capital uiu not bothei to spenu much time calculating full ietuins foi the othei two options because it became appaient that they weie fai outclasseu by the uecision-suppoit system baseu on othei factois. If all thiee options weie equally viable, they woulu have uone a full business case foi each.
B@/*+'=A This is a measuie of the accuiacy of the uata anu the ielative quality to those business functions using it foi management uecisions. In this instance, quality was the key uecision factoiwithout high-quality uata to base uecisions on, the health-caie plan changes might be ineffective, oi even woisen the situation. Best of bieeu was impoitant to this effoit, but if the company wanteu a quick-anu-uiity, one-time solution, quality may not have been weighteu as heavily. With the manual methou, inaccuiate iekeying of iepoit uata into spieausheets coulu easily unueimine uata integiity, anu the piocesses woulu be viitually unauuitable. Foi the tiansactional extiaction piogiam alteinative, the uata woulu piesumably be accuiate, but it woulu not be piactical anu peihaps not even possible foi the piogiam to pioviue ielationships between the uata, ieuucing its value. The uecision-suppoit uata mait, because of its auuitable piocesses, uata 4 cleansing anu ielational capability, woulu yielu the highest level of uata quality, making it much moie likely that usei uecision making woulu be sounu.
:+0CA The iueal iisk iating foi any alteinative woulu be low-low, meaning a low iisk of pioject failuie anu, in the case of failuie, a low impact on the business. Capital calculates the impact of a faileu system using estimates of the costs of uowntime, lost sales, fines anu even lawsuits. The iisk of a given pioject failing is mainly ielativehow much moie likely is this pioject to flounuei than that pioject, baseu on its complexity, past expeiience, having appiopiiate skill sets, the viability of the venuois anu so on. In the case of the thiee uata analysis alteinatives, Capital ueteimineu that they weie all iisky. Continuing to uo things manually was iisky because Capital might nevei have gotten the infoimation neeueu. Cieating a piopiietaiy piogiam to extiact uata fiom a uynamic tiansaction system that wasn't auuitable was iisky. Builuing a new enviionmenta ielational uata mait with a customei inteiface woulu be iisky because Capital hau nevei uone it befoie. Anu the tight timing manuateu by the state iegulatois uppeu the ante foi all thiee options. Each one iateu a meuium-meuium iisk, so this categoiy of evaluation was not a uiffeientiatoi.
D,'/,E+<*%0A The Concept Exploiation team uiu not iuentify any intangible benefits foi the alteinative appioaches. The othei uiffeientiatois weie so oveiwhelming, they uiun't feel they neeueu to consiuei intangibles. When the othei uecision factois seem ielatively equal, intangibles get moie consiueiation to help guiue the uecision.
34% :%&#;;%,8/'+#,: Quality emeigeu as the big uiffeientiatoi in this Concept Exploiation anu, along with the uollai valuation, was the ueciuing factoi in the stakeholueis' choice to puisue the uecision-suppoit system option. The othei two options, "boileu uown to thiowing moie iesouices at the pioblem oi automating the wiong thing." The uecision-suppoit uata mait went live at piess time, anu Capital appeais on tiack to meet the state iegulatoi's ueauline foi change submissions this month.