Professional Documents
Culture Documents
As already intimated, the term "rights" tends to be used indiscriminately to cover what in a given case may be a privilege, a power, or immunity, rather than a right in the strictest sense; and this looseness of usage is occasionally recognized by the authorities.The analysis of Salmond was carried further by Hohfeld. He analysed it with greater accuracy. Hohfelds description of relations between various forms of legal entitlements reflects truths on features of legal rights. Countless references thereof prove Hohfelds great influence on analytical jurisprudence. Hohfelds contribution is mostly contained in two articles published in the Yale Law Journal in 1913 and 1917 respectively. The one published in 1913 and entitled Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning is one of the most cited articles in law reviews in general. It is important to point out that Hohfeld had not expected the article to be a revolutionary theoretical contribution to the legal science. On the contrary, his motifs had been primarily pedagogic, i.e. he had intended to show that developments in the field of jurisprudence and in the field of legal pedagogy had to be connected. Hohfelds intention was to emphasize the educational effects of a clear analytical opinion on legal issues. He denied that the article, as may be suggested by its title, represented a merely philosophical inquiry as to the nature of law and legal relations, but its main purpose was to emphasize certain oft neglected matters that may aid in the understanding and in the solution of practical, everyday problems of law. Hohfeld did reveal that his articles are intended more for the law school students than for any other class of readers. Three types of relationships/jural relations:1. Jural correlatives/ correspondents (vertical arrows) 2. Jural opposites/ negations ( cross arrows) 3. Jural contradictories (horizontal arrows)
Right (claim)
Liberty (privilege)
Duty
No Claim
Power
Immunity
Liability
Disability
Those rights are divided into different categories: (1) Rights in the strict sense, which are defined as interests protected by the law by imposing its duties with respect to the rights upon other persons, (2) Liberties defined as interests of unrestrained activity and (3) Powers when the law actively assists me in making my will effective.
Salmond found no generic term which would be correlative to right in a wider sense, and would include all the burdens imposed by the law. Nevertheless, he, correlative to those three categories of advantages or benefits, singled out three types of legal burdens: duties, disabilities and liabilities. Salmond also made a table of correlatives but he did not pay much attention to the opposites. On the other hand, Hohfeld cleared out the relation between the eight fundamental legal conceptions by inventing different terms for the correlatives of liberties and powers and by designing the relations between the opposites.