ECE521 Mini-Project Evaluation Form (2013)

ECE521: Microprocessor System Mini-Project Evaluation Form

Panel Name: Project Title: Group Members 1. (. +. ,. Role Leader (L) &)stem *esi!ner (&*) Pro!rammer (P) Testin! Leader (TL)

Allow second demonstration? ( P!" #$%, to be filled at the discretion of eval atin! "anel) # $%& # N'

REP R! E&$%'$!" # -tem Project 'bjectives &)stem *escri"tion 8 &)stem '"eration .ood 3 1 10 7learl) states the objectives. The overview and o"eration of the s)stem is clearl) described. The details are !iven and well1 or!ani9ed. The "roject sco"e is clearl) defined. <ardware schematics are "rovided. 7irc it desi!n considerations and reasonin! are "rovided in detail. The circ it is correctl) desi!ned. &atisfactor) 415 The objectives are reasonabl) stated. The overview and o"eration of the s)stem is reasonabl) described. The level of detail is reasonable and s fficientl) or!ani9ed. The "roject sco"e is ade; atel) defined. <ardware schematics are "rovided. 7irc it desi!n considerations and reasonin! are !iven and satisfactoril) e="lained. The circ it has few desi!n flaws that do not affect its overall f nctionalit). /nsatisfactor) +16 The objectives are not clearl) stated. The overview and o"eration of the s)stem is not "ro"erl) described, either beca se the) are not described in de"th, or lac:in! in or!ani9ation. The "roject sco"e is inade; atel) defined. <ardware schematics are "rovided. 7irc it desi!n serio sl) lac:s considerations and "ro"er reasonin!. The circ it has serio s desi!n flaws that im"ede the overall f nctionalit) of the s)stem. Poor 01( 'bjectives are not !iven or nacce"table. -nformation on s)stem descri"tion and o"eration were not !iven or nacce"table. &core (0110) 2ei!ht 0.(6 1.00 2ei!hted &core

Project &co"e

The "roject sco"e is not "rovided or nacce"table. <ardware schematics are not "rovided or nacce"table.

0.(6

<ardware *esi!n

1.00

ECE521 Mini-Project Evaluation Form (2013)

&oftware *esi!n

>lowcharts and software listin! are "rovided. >lowchart is correctl) desi!ned and e="lained. The "ro!ram is written correctl). Pro!ram is e="lained in detail.

>lowcharts and software listin! are "rovided. >lowchart is desi!ned with minim m errors and e="lained. The "ro!ram has few mista:es. Pro!ram is e="lained in reasonable detail.

>lowcharts and software listin! are "rovided. >lowchart has some serio s desi!n flaws that im"ede overall f nctionalit) of the "ro!ram. The flowchart is not e="lained in the re"ort. The "ro!ram has serio s mista:es. Pro!ram is not s fficientl) e="lained.

>lowcharts and software listin! are not "rovided or are nacce"table. >lowchart is nacce"table. The "ro!ram is nacce"table. The "ro!ram is inade; atel) e="lained.

1.00

Testin!

The testin! methods are clearl) described. The details are !iven and well1 or!ani9ed.

The testin! methods are reasonabl) described. The level of detail is reasonable and s fficientl) or!ani9ed. Problems faced d rin! desi!n are s fficientl) described. &ol tions are lo!ical and satisfactoril) described. Test res lts s bstantiall) demonstrate the s)stem o"eration. %="lanations of res lts are satisfactoril) "resented.

The testin! methods are not "ro"erl) described, either beca se the) lac: in detail or or!ani9ation.

-nformation on testin! methods was not !iven or nacce"table.

0.(6

*eb !!in!

Problems faced d rin! desi!n are described in detail. &ol tions "resented are lo!ical and detailed.

Problems faced d rin! desi!n are inade; atel) "resented. The sol tions are either illo!ical or lac: im"ortant details. Test res lts "rovide little demonstration of the s)stem o"eration. %="lanations of the res lts are inade; ate.

Problems faced d rin! desi!n and the sol tions are not described or nacce"table.

0.(6

?es lts

Test res lts f ll) demonstrate s)stem o"eration. %="lanations of the res lts are clearl) "resented.

Test res lts are absent or irrelevant in demonstratin! o"eration of the s)stem.

0.60

ECE521 Mini-Project Evaluation Form (2013)

7oncl sions 8 ?ecommendations

7learl) s mmari9ed im"ortant desi!n feat res and test res lts. ?ecommendations are relevant and described in s fficient detail.

&atisfactoril) s mmari9ed im"ortant desi!n feat res and test res lts. ?ecommendations are relevant b t the details are ins fficientl) described.

/nsatisfactoril) s mmari9ed im"ortant desi!n feat res and test res lts. ?ecommendations are relevant b t nsatisfactoril) described.

*oes not s mmari9e im"ortant desi!n feat res and test res lts. ?ecommendations are not relevant or si!nificantl) lac: in detail.

0.(6

.rammar and 'verall Presentation

@a) contain a few errors, which ma) anno) the reader, b t not im"ede nderstandin!. >ollows the format and references cited correctl). >onts are accordin! to the format "rescribed. .ood word "rocessin! s:ills. *oc ment is bo nd or firml) sta"ledA no loose sheets.

/s all) contains several errors, which ma) tem"oraril) conf se the reader b t not im"ede the overall nderstandin!. &atisfactoril) follows the format and references cited correctl). >onts do not follow the format "rescribed, b t acce"table. &atisfactor) word "rocessin! s:ills. *oc ment is bo nd or firml) sta"ledA no loose sheets.

/s all) contains either man) errors of a few im"ortant errors that bloc: the readerBs nderstandin! and abilit) to see connections between tho !hts. *oes not follow format and references cited wron!l). Cad font si9es. Poor word "rocessor s:ills. Poor "a!e la)o t. Loose "a!es, not well bo nd.

/s all) contains too man) errors that it is im"ossible for the reader to follow the thin:in! from sentence to sentence. *oes not follow format and references cited wron!l). 7ra9) fonts. @an) word "rocessor errors. Loose "a!es, no bindin!.

0.(6

T'TAL @A?D&

E60

ECE521 Mini-Project Evaluation Form (2013)

PRESE#!$!" # E&$%'$!" # -tem Presentation .ood 3 1 10 The "resentation details all im"ortant "oints in hardware and software desi!n, as well as f nctionalit) of the "roject. &atisfactor) 415 The "resentation s fficientl) covers all im"ortant "oints in hardware and software desi!n, as well as f nctionalit) of the "roject. Fis al aides are of hi!h ; alit) and s fficientl) sed to artic late "oints. /nsatisfactor) +16 The "resentation failed to s fficientl) cover all im"ortant "oints in hardware and software desi!n, and did not demonstrate the f ll f nctionalit) of the "roject. Fis al aides are sed, b t lac: the level of detail necessar), and are not sed to "resent "oints effectivel). Presentation is com"leted moderatel) above the allocated time frame. Noticeable dela)s that si!nificantl) im"ede the overall efficienc) of the time !iven. -nformation artic lated in a barel) clear and a dible tone. A si!nificant "roblem with the "resenterBs %n!lish, and lon! dela)s in artic latin! "oints. @an) !rammatical mista:es that si!nificantl) im"edes nderstandin! of the "resentation. Poor 01( The "resentation did not cover all im"ortant "oints in hardware and software desi!n, and did not demonstrate an) f nctionalit) of the "roject. Fis al aides are not "rovided. &core (0110) 2ei!ht 0.,0 2ei!hted &core

Fis al Aides

Fis al aides are interestin!, of ver) hi!h ; alit) and sed effectivel) to artic late "oints. Presentation is com"leted the in allocated time frame. Presentation time is tili9ed efficientl) for "resentation.

0.,0

Time @ana!ement

Presentation is com"leted sli!htl) above or below the allocated time frame. Noticeable dela)s, b t does not si!nificantl) im"ede the overall efficienc) of the time !iven. -nformation artic lated in a s fficientl) clear and a dible tone. The "resenter is fl ent in %n!lish. <owever, there are noticeable dela)s in artic latin! "oints. >ew !rammatical mista:es that do not si!nificantl) im"ede nderstandin! of the "resentation

Presentation is com"leted si!nificantl) above the allocated time frame. &i!nificant dela)s that ta:e " most of the "resentation time.

0.+0

>l enc)

-nformation artic lated in a clear and a dible tone. The "resenter is ver) fl ent in %n!lish. >ew !rammatical mista:es that do not im"ede nderstandin! of the "resentation.

-nformation artic lated in an nclear and ina dible tone. The "resenter cannot "resent in an) nderstandable %n!lish. @an) !rammatical mista:es that ma:e it im"ossible to nderstand the "resentation.

0.+0

ECE521 Mini-Project Evaluation Form (2013)

T'TAL @A?D& GR 'P E&$%'$!" # -tem %="lanation of technical information .ood 3 1 10 -nformation is "resented in a clear and concise manner. *etailed anal)sis of "roblem is "rovided. The "ro"osed sol tion is viable and described clearl). The hardware and software s)stem f lfils all of the re; ired objectives. Abilit) to artic late ideas to solve the "roblem The answers !iven to all ; estions can be acce"ted. &atisfactor) 415 -nformation is "resented in a s fficientl) clear and concise manner. /nsatisfactor) +16 -nformation is "resented in an nclear and nor!ani9ed manner. The level of anal)sis for the !iven "roblem is not described in detail. The "ro"osed sol tion is not viable and not described clearl). The hardware and software s)stem onl) com"lies with onl) a small "art of re; ired objectives. The answers !iven to minim m n mber of ; estions can be acce"ted. Poor 01( -nformation is "resented in a ver) nclear and nor!ani9ed manner. The level of anal)sis for the !iven "roblem is not "rovided. The "ro"osed sol tion is not "rovided. The hardware and software s)stem does not com"l) with an) of the re; ired objectives. &core (0110) L &* P TL 0.( 2 2ei!hted &core L &* P

E1,

TL

Abilit) to solve !iven "roblem

The level of anal)sis for the !iven "roblem is s fficientl) detail. The "ro"osed sol tion is viable, b t not described clearl). The hardware and software s)stem is com"lies with most of the re; ired objectives.

0.(

The answers !iven to lar!e n mber of ; estions can be acce"ted.

The answers !iven to all ; estions cannot be acce"ted at all.

0.(

T'TAL @A?D&

E4

E4

E4

E4

ECE521 Mini-Project Evaluation Form (2013)

PanelBs A""roval:

# Acce"ted

# ?ejected

-f ?%G%7T%*, state reasons: HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH E#( F E&$%'$!" # F RM