NEW YORK POST: Wells Fargo made up on-demand foreclosure papers plan: court filing charges

alex Reply-To: DIRT To: DIRT@listserv.umkc.edu if you are looking for the wells 150 page which I would argue is not a wells but an LPS document, since two of the parties who are named were/are LPS parties... here it is... LPS converted many of its internal employees into servicer emails and set up "location management" agreements to continue the "surrogate" signing program they have forgotten one item...they have planted themselves in states where the notaries are required to keep a log... and in such states, the log is a public document available for duplication...the key is not to allow the "notary" to ask you which case you are interested in, but ask them for a cost for a copy of each and every one of the logs... they all turn yellow when you ask...since there are still some magical "borrowings" of notary stamps going on... anyway, here is what I believe is the 150 page report in question Linda Tirelli has an active bankruptcy practice, so it would take a bit of work to track down her clients case, and unless she presents it to the public, which she hasn't, who that party is, maybe its not a good thing to lay out who the client is, unless she chooses to present that. Also, Wells may argue, like Citi did with the Plutocrat report of Ajay Kapur, that it is an internal copyrighted document and therefore will send a cease and desist in any attempts to file it publicly on any website My copy of this has nothing to do with Atty Tirelli and it predates her actions in her current case, nor have I given a copy of it to any mutually known parties, so no one should waste any courts time complaining about any disclosures by Atty Tirelli. I also don't have, as a chief judge down here reminded me a few years back, a law license to be tweaked or challenged, so I am not too hard to find...and only do legal support work for attorneys across the country. but having spoken over the years, with Intellectual Property attorneys for the old amsouth, DB, and Mers, I am not too worried about someone sending me any more C&D letters as they would not like me paying the filing fee with the USPTO to challenge their clients Trademark. Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 5:07 PM