You are on page 1of 12

: Discussion

.5
.1.5

).(Teghammar, 2013

440 - 114
. VS 1- ) Nges and Liu, 2009
Gudeta, 2010 Fountoulakis et al., 2010 Thiruvenkadam, 2011
Rodriguez, 2011 Athanasoulia et al., 2012 ( Meabe et al., 2013
47 . VS 1- .

).(Rodrigouz, 2011

Behera
) (2010 )(I/S
) (I/S .

) (Hagelqvist, 2013 ).(Kalloum et al., 2011



24-18
) Fountoulakis et al., 2010 Kalloum et al., 2011
Athanasoulia et al., 2012 .( Hagelqvist, 2013

(2011) Rodrigouz

Kymlinen ) (2012 %90

78

: Discussion
14

.

(Rodrigouz, 2011) %45


Nges and Liu, 2009) %69-60 Yan et al., 2012
.(Meabe et al., 2013
C/N
) 4.83 ( C/N

30 - 20
).(Kerga, 2011
(2011) Beam
%38

%33 ).(Gudeta, 2010

) (Issac, 2003
) Fountoulakis et al., 2010 Francioso et al., 2010 Kalloum et al., 2011
Yan et al., 2012 Kim et al., 2012 .( Meabe et al., 2012


).(Strauss et al., 1997


) Gudeta, 2010 Beam, 211 (Yan et al., 2012
6.1 8.3
).(Ferrer et al., 2010

79

: Discussion




).(Yan et al., 2012


).(Yan et al., 2012
)(Kymlinen et al., 2012
%64 - 61 .%63 - 45


) .(EPA, 1992

).(Rubio-Loza and Noyola, 2009
COD

VS COD/VS

COD/VS

.COD
VS ).(Kerga, 2011

(1980) Pipyn and Verstraete



.

Stafford ) (1980
%99 - 20


.


BOD
COD/BOD
2.16
%50
).(Gudeta, 2010
80

: Discussion

COD BOD
) (Kalloum et al., 2011 COD BOD
%88 %90 .

.

)(Andersson, 2011

.




.

) Cordero, 2010 Kalloum et al., 2011 .(Yan et al., 2012
30

) Ramirez et al., 2005 Kalloum et al., 2011 .(Yan et al., 2012

.2.5 :


.

.
(2010) Danqi



.



).(Chen et al., 1985

81

: Discussion


) .(Gerardi, 2003


).(Vavilin et al., 2008

.

) .(McDonald et al., 1988



) (Stafford et al., 1980


).(Xiao and Clarkson, 1997



) Osman, 2006
Demetriades, 2008 Kaparaju etal., 2009 Gudeta, 2010 Wang, 2010
Kerga, 2011 .( Kim et al., 2013

C/N
) Krupp et al., 2005 .( Dohanyos et al., 2004

C/N 4.83
C/N
C/N .



).(Nges, 2012
82

: Discussion

3 .VS 1-
) .(Pohl et al.,2012
) Liew, 2011 .(Kalloum et al., 2011

) Kaparaju et al., 2009 Wang, 2010 Chandra et al., 2012
( Kim et al., 2013 3 - 2
.


.(Kerga, 2011) C/N

COD

.

.3.5



) Pohl et al., 2012 ( Kim et al., 2013


50-25 .


).(Duran and Speece, 1997



83

: Discussion
.

.
).(Levn et al., 2007


) (Schimd and lipper, 1969
) 25 - 2(

). (Schnrer and Jarvis, 2009



. .


).(Insam et al., 2010


) Liu and Whitman, 2008 .(Chen et al., 2008
.

.

) ( ) (

).(Malin and Illmer, 2008

7.5 - 6.5
).(Schnurer and Jarvis, 2009

84

: Discussion



).(Beam, 2011


.
) (

) Sierra-Alvarez and Lettinga, 1991 Sierra-Alvarez et al., 1994


.( Torry-Smith et al., 2003

C/N 43 27

. C/N
10 30 25 30
) Yadvika et al., 2004 .(Liu and Whitman, 2008

).(Hawkes, 1980
C/N

).(Alvarez and Lidn, 2008

.4.5


7.0 - 6.5
85

: Discussion
8.5 - 5.0
(Boe, 2006) 7.5 - 6.5
).(Schnrer and Jarvis, 2009

. .

) Gerardi, 2003 .(Schnrer and Jarvis, 2009



) (Beam, 2011

).(Popov, 2010

38
56

.
.
Lei ) (2010


465 . 1-

13 - 7.




.
86

: Discussion

.5.5

) Mohanrao, 1974
Aubart and Farinet, 1983 Perot, et al., 1988 Van and Faber, 1996
Mahanta et al., 2004 .( JiaJia et al., 2012

Wilkie ) (2004
20 .


) Banister and Pretorius, 1998 .( Stroot et al., 2001



) Mahanta et al., 2004 .(JiaJia et al., 2012



55 - 37

63 - 56


60 - 40
- -

87

: Discussion

42

90

90 60 .

.5.5 .

)( .


63 - 37 .
%78.66


.
) (Andersson, 2011


COD

.Hydrolysis

Acidogenesis

.COD
).(Beam, 2011

60 - 30



.Methanogensis
88

: Discussion

) CO2 CO3


(
) .(Gudeta, 2010

COD

.



.

89

You might also like