Enkitec Exadata Open House

12/23/12 Copyright 2009 Enkitec, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. 2

12/23/12 Copyright 2009 Enkitec, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. 3
Why Exadata?
- 8educed lmplemenLauon 1lme
- 8alanced, Scalable Congurauon
8euer
- erformance, erformance, erformance
lasLer
- Consolldauon and Slmpllcauon
- Lower 1CC Across-Lhe-8oard
Lower CosL
12/23/12 Copyright 2009 Enkitec, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. 4
Fast Deployment Example: Direct Marketing Company
Compresslon 8auos
Compression Type GB Compression
Ratio
None 33.49 0
Advanced Compression 10.31 219
HCC For Query Low 3.03 363
HCC For Query High 3.04 1002
HCC For Archive Low 2.67 1133
HCC For Archive High 2.29 1360
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
20.00
selecL * from Lable,
no Compresslon
CL1
PCC Cry Low
PCC Cry Plgh
PCC Arc Low
PCC Arc Plgh
First ! Rack Exadata Rack System
in Production in about 2 weeks
Staff DBA created initial database
using DBCA
3 Production Databases running in 2
months
Second Exadata ! Rack used as
Dataguard Physical Standby
12/23/12 Copyright 2009 Enkitec, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. 5
Performance Example: Mid Size Retailer
12/23/12 Copyright 2009 Enkitec, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. 6
Performance Example: Mid Size Retailer
Current Stats:
Currently runs on M5000 with 32
cores
Test 1: Nightly forecast runs
multithreaded 4 stores at a time,
and typically takes 2.75 hours to
complete
Test 2: PO Build Plan process
which runs approx 90-120 seconds
currently
Test 3: Three ad hoc queries
running 56 minutes, 27 minutes,
and 4 minutes respectively
Exadata Results:
Tested on ! Rack Exadata with 16
cores
Test 1: Parallel factor of 18 stores at a
time, Best forecast run approx 53
minutes for all stores
Test 2: PO Build Plans completed in
approx .2 seconds
Test 3: Queries completed in 4.5
minutes, 8 minutes, and 5 seconds
respectively
Non-required Indices removed which reduced
space by 25% and reduced runtime by approx
30%
12/23/12 Copyright 2009 Enkitec, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. 7
Consolidation Example: Large Direct Marketing Firm
Current Stats:
Non-scalable business model: New
customers required dedicated hw/sw
platforms, slow onboarding, complex,
expensive management. Nine
current customers required:
29 different DB instances
21 different servers
3 different OS versions
7 different versions of Oracle DB
6 different BI/Analytics apps
3 different ETL tools
and a partridge in a pear tree
Exadata Results:
Consolidation into (2) Full Exadata RACs
Carved out 1/4 Rack for Dev/Test/UAT
Prod DB instances reduced to 9
Five cluster groups allow resource
sharing with segmentation
Created DB and IORM Resource
Management policies to ensure
consistent response times
One version of Oracle DB/OS/HW
One vendor for Support
Centralized management via OEM
Reducing and standardizing on fewer
3
rd
party apps/tools
12/23/12 Copyright 2009 Enkitec, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. 8
Exadata 5 Year Total Cost of Ownership Comparison
5 Year Comparison
(Hardware, Software, Support, Labor, Datacenter)
Traditional Platform $6.3M
2 Exadata 1/4 Racks $3.7M
Savings $2.6M (5yr NPV)
41% Savings over Traditional
Platform
Not inclusive of Exadata
business operational benefits
Five Year Cost Comparison
$0
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
$1,600,000
$1,800,000
$2,000,000
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
A
n
n
u
a
l

N
e
t

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

Traditional Platform Exadata
12/23/12 Copyright 2009 Enkitec, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. 9
Demo Time
12/23/12 Copyright 2009 Enkitec, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. 10
Questions / Contact Information
Questions?
Contact Information : Kerry Osborne
Email: kerry.osborne@enkitec.com
Blog: kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com
www.enkitec.com