Professional Documents
Culture Documents
earphone-type IRT was inserted into either the left or esophagus (approximately 30 cm) for measurements
right ear canal to measure the temperature of the of TRes and TEso, respectively. These measured tem-
tympanic membrane (TTym). General anesthesia was peratures were monitored and recorded at 1-min
induced using IV propofol (1.0 –1.5 mg/kg) and fen- intervals. The temperatures of operating rooms were
tanyl (1.0 –2.0 g/kg), and intubation of the trachea kept at 19°C–21°C, and a conductive warming/
was performed with 0.15 mg/kg vecuronium. Anes- cooling system (Medi-therm IIITM; Orchard Park, NY)
thesia was maintained with 1.0%–2.0% sevoflurane in was used to control the patient’s body temperature.
oxygen with intermittent administration of fentanyl
(50 –100 g) as an adjuvant analgesic. After induction of Statistical Analysis
general anesthesia, thermistor probes were inserted into The TTym measured by the earphone-type IRT was
the rectum (approximately 8 cm) and esophagus (ap- evaluated in comparison with TEso as a body core
proximately 30 cm) for measurements of rectal (TRec) and temperature (7,13). Bland-Altman plots were used to
esophageal (TEso) temperatures, respectively, using a evaluate the limits of agreement between TTym and
thermometer (CTM-210TM; Terumo, Tokyo, Japan). TEso. The mean value of the difference (⫽bias) ⬎0.4°C,
These measured temperatures were monitored and re- and 2 sd (repeatability or precision) ⬎⫾1.0°C was
corded automatically to a personal laptop computer at considered clinically significant (12).
1-min intervals. The temperatures of operating rooms
were kept at 22°C–24°C, and a forced-air warming RESULTS
system (Bair HuggerTM; Arizant Healthcare, Eden Prai- We enrolled 18 patients (aged 18 to 67 yr [mean 46.2
rie, MN) was used to warm the patient. yr]) in Study 1, and eight patients (aged 56 to 78 yr
[mean 68.3 yr]) in Study 2. The median durations of
Study 2: Cardiac Surgery with CPB the operations were 186 min (range, 50 – 650 min) in
Eight adult patients (ASA II or III, between 40 and Study 1, and 342 min (range, 250 – 654 min) in Study 2.
80 yr) who had been scheduled for elective cardiac The measured ambient temperature ranged from
surgery with CPB were enrolled in this study. No 19.0°C to 24.2°C in both studies. After deletion of
premedication was given. Similar to Study 1, the obvious artifacts caused by bipolar high frequency
probe of an earphone-type IRT was inserted into coagulation, we obtained 2610 measurements in Study
either the left or right ear canal before induction of 1 and 521 measurements in Study 2 with each of the
anesthesia. General anesthesia was induced by IV three devices. There were no complications related to
midazolam (0.05– 0.15 mg/kg) and fentanyl (5–10 the site of insertion of the probe in the ear canal.
g/kg), vecuronium (0.15 mg/kg) was given and
intubation of the trachea was performed. Anesthesia Study 1: Nonabdominal and Noncardiac Surgery
was maintained with 1.0%–2.0% sevoflurane in oxy- Figure 2 shows the Bland-Altman plot comparing
gen with intermittent administration of fentanyl TTym and TEso, and TRec and TEso, in nonabdominal
(50 –100 –200 g) as an adjuvant analgesic. After in- and noncardiac surgery, respectively. The average
duction of general anesthesia, thermistor probes were temperature measured with the IRT was ⫹0.08°C
inserted into the rectum (approximately 8 cm) and above the TEso with ⫾0.34°C 2 sd, and that with the
Vol. 105, No. 6, December 2007 © 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society 1689
Figure 2. Bland-Altman analysis be-
tween tympanic (TTym) and esopha-
geal temperatures (TEso) (A) and be-
tween rectal (TRec) and esophageal
temperatures (TEso) (B) in nonabdomi-
nal and noncardiac surgery. The aver-
age temperature measured with the
infrared infrared tympanic thermom-
eter (IRT) was ⫹ 0.08°C above the TEso
with ⫾ 0.34°C 2 sd, and that with the
TRec was ⫹ 0.11°C above the TEso
with ⫾ 0.55°C 2 sd. The bias and
repeatability between TTym and TEso
was ⬍0.1°C and ⬍0.5°C, respectively.
TRec was ⫹0.11°C above the TEso with ⫾0.55°C 2 sd. the probe for TRec monitoring is equipped with a
The bias and repeatability between TTym and TEso was disposable cover, there are problems regarding hy-
⬍0.1°C and ⬍0.5°C, respectively. giene and obtaining informed consent for use from the
patient. Measurement of bladder temperature is a
Study 2: Cardiac Surgery with CPB convenient method for surgery in which a urethral
The Bland-Altman plot of the temperature mea- catheter is used, but this method cannot be used for a
surements during cooling and rewarming phases with short operation or during sedation, in which a bladder
CPB is shown in Figure 3. The average TTym was catheter is not needed.
⫹0.72°C above the TEso with ⫾2.2°C 2 sd, and that TEso measurement and contact-type TTym measure-
with the TRec was ⫹0.43°C above the TEso with ⫾3.4°C ment have high degrees of reliability for monitoring
2 sd. core temperature (7,13). However, because of its inva-
sive nature, TEso measurement for core temperature
DISCUSSION monitoring can only be used for operations under
Measurement of TRec or bladder temperature is general anesthesia, and the probe is difficult to insert
widely used for monitoring body core temperature in patients undergoing regional anesthesia (16) and
during surgery. Although measurements of those tem- general anesthesia via a laryngeal mask airway. Inser-
peratures have been reported to be reliable for core tion of the probe may also cause damage to the
temperature monitoring (14), it is difficult to follow pharynx or esophagus. Measurement of TTym has been
sudden core temperature changes by such measure- established as a useful method for core temperature
ments (15) and, therefore, these measurements are not monitoring because the blood to the tympanic mem-
reliable in the case of malignant hyperthermia or brane is supplied directly by the carotid artery (7,13).
sudden decline in body temperature. Rectal or bladder However, a contact-type TTym monitoring device can
measurements are even less reliable during lower cause pain in the tympanic membrane when inserted
abdominal surgery because they are influenced by in an awake state, and there have been reports of
operating room temperature (11). Moreover, although tympanic membrane damage caused by insertion of
Vol. 105, No. 6, December 2007 © 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society 1691
17. Tabor MW, Blaho DM, Schriver WR. Tympanic membrane 20. Harasawa K, Kemmotsu O, Mayumi T, Kawano Y. Comparison
perforation: complication of tympanic thermometry during of tympanic, esophageal and blood temperatures during mild
general anesthesia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1981;51: hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass: a study using an infra-
581–3 red emission detection tympanic thermometer. J Clin Monit
18. Wallace CT, Marks WE Jr., Adkins WY, Mahaffery JE. Perfora- 1997;13:19 –24
tion of the tympanic membrane, a complication of tympanic 21. Noguchi I, Matsukawa T, Ozaki M, Amemiya Y. Propofol in low
thermometry during anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1974;41:290 –1 doses causes redistribution of body heat in male volunteers. Eur
19. Yaw AA, Jonathon Del M, Constantine A. Accuracy of an J Anaesthesiol 2002;19:677– 81
infrared tympanic thermometer. Chest 1999;115:1002–5