Introduction

Topic introduction
Company profile
Objectives of the study
Need of the study
Scope of the study
Limitations of the study
Review of literature


RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH
Research is a process in which the researcher wishes to find out the end result for a given
problem and thus the solution helps in future course of action. The research has been defined as
A careful investigation or enquiry especially through search for new fact in any branch of
knowledge.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The procedure using, which researchers go about their work of describing, explaining and
predicting phenomena, is called Methodology. Methods compromise the procedures used for
generating, collecting, and evaluating data. Methods are the ways of obtaining information useful
for assessing explanation.
TYPES OF RESEARCH
The type of research used in this project is descriptive in nature. Descriptive research is
essentially a fact finding related largely to the present, abstracting generations by cross sectional
study of the current situation .The descriptive methods are extensively used in the physical and
natural science, for instance when physics measures, biology classifies, zoology dissects and
geology studies the rock. But its use in social science is more common, as in socio economic
surveys and job and activity analysis.
DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH AIMS AT
To portray the characteristics of a particular individual situation or group (with or without
specific initial hypothesis about the nature of this characteristics).
To determine the frequency with which something occurs or with which it is associated
with something else( usually , but not always ,with a specific initial hypothesis).
The descriptive method has certain limitation; one is that the research may make description
itself an end itself.
Research is essentially creative and demands the discovery of facts on order to lead a
solution of the problem. A second limitation is associated whether the statistical techniques
dominate. The desire to over emphasis central tendencies and to fact in terms of Average,
Correlation, Means and dispersion may not always be either welcome.
This limitation arises because statistics which is partly a descriptive tool of analysis can aid but
not always explain casual relation.
DESIGN OF DESCRIPTIVE STUDIES:
Descriptive studies aim at portraying accurately the characteristics of a particular group
or solution. One may undertake a descriptive study about the work in the factory, health and
welfare. A descriptive study may be concerned with the right to strike, capital punishment,
prohibition etc.
A descriptive study involves the following steps:
1. Formulating the objectives of the study.
2. Defining the population and selecting the sample.
3. Designing the method of data collection.
4. Analysis of the data.
5. Conclusion and recommendation for further improvement in the practices.

RESEARCH DESIGN
Research design is the specification of the method and procedure for acquiring the
information needed to solve the problem.
The research design followed for this research study is descriptive research design where we find
a solution to an existing problem. The problem of this study is to find the effectiveness of
Employees absenteeism at oxygen creations proved Ltd.,
UNIVERSE AND SAMPLING:
This study was restricted to the blue collar consumer. Out of the universe of 1000 blue
collars, a sample of 100 respondents was selected by simple random sampling method. All the
opinions expressed herein are the contribution by the respondents only.

QUESTIONNAIRE CONSTRUCTION

Questionnaires were constructed based on the following types
Open ended questions
Close ended questions
Multiple choice questions

DATA COLLECTION METHOD
Survey method is considered the best method for data collection and the tool used for
data collection are Questionnaire. Private individuals, research workers, private and public
organizations and even government are adopting it. In this method a questionnaire is collected
through personal interview. A questionnaire consists of a number of question involves both
specific and general question related to Employees absenteeism.
SOURCES OF DATA
The two sources of data collection are namely primary secondary.
Primary data
Primary data are fresh data collected through survey from the employees using
questionnaire.
Secondary data
Secondary data are collected from books, internet and various journals, magazines etc.
DESCRIPTION OF STATISTICAL TOOLS USED
Percentage method
Weighted average method
Chi-square test



1. PERCENTAGE METHOD

In this project Percentage method test was used. The percentage method is used to know the
accurate percentages of the data we took, it is easy to graph out through the percentages. The
following are the formula

No of Respondent
Percentage of Respondent = x 100
Total no. of Respondents

From the above formula, we can get percentages of the data given by the respondents.

2. WEIGHTED AVERAGE METHOD

Weighted average can be defined as an average whose component items are multiplied by
certain values (weights) and the aggregate of the products are divided by the total of
weights.
One of the limitations of simple arithmetic mean is that it gives equal importance to all
the items of the distribution.
Certain cases relative importance of all the items in the distribution is not the same.
Where the importance of the items varies.

It is essential to allocate weight applied but may vary in different cases. Thus weightage is a
number standing for the relative importance of the items.




1. CHI-SQUARE ANALYSIS


In this project chi-square test was used. This is an analysis of technique which analyzed
the stated data in the project. It analysis the assumed data and calculated in the study. The Chi-
square test is an important test amongst the several tests of significant developed by statistical.
Chi-square, symbolically written as x
2
(Pronounce as Ki-Spare), is a statistical measure used in
the context of sampling analysis for comparing a variance to a theoretical variance.

Formula
(O-E)
2

2 =
E
O = Observed frequency

E = Expected frequency











DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
TABLE 1

Classification based on the age level of respondents
S.No Age group
No. of.
Respondents
Percentage
1 18- 25 years 10 10%
2 26-35 years 12 12%
3 36-45 years 20 20%
4 46-55 years 35 35%
5 Above 55 years 23 33%
Total 100 100


INTREPRETATION:

From the above table it is shows that, 35% of the respondents are in the age group of
between46-55 years, 23% of the respondents are in the age group of between Above 55
years, 20% of the respondents are in the age group of between 36-45 years and 12% of the
respondents are in the age group of 26-35 years and remaining 10% of the respondents are in
the age group of 18- 25 years.



CHART 1
Classification based on the age level of respondents










Table .2
Gender wise classification of the respondents
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
18- 25 years 26-35 years 36-45 years 46-55 years Above 55 years
10%
12%
20%
35%
33%
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e


S.No Gender
No. of.
Respondents
Percentage
1
male
60 60%
2
female
40 40%
Total 100 100%


INTREPRETATION:
The above table shows that, 60% of the respondents are male, remaining 40% of the
respondents are female.








CHART 2
Gender wise classification of the respondents










Table .3

male
60%
female
40%
Classification based on the educational qualification of the respondents

S.No
Educational
qualification
No. of.
Respondents
Percentage
1
SSLC
05 05%
2
+2
12 12%
3
UG
33 33%
4
PG
43 43%
5
Others
07 07%
Total 100 100


INTREPRETATION:

From the above table it is interpreted that, 43% of the respondents are qualified atPG
level, 33% of the respondents are qualified at UG level, 12% of the respondents are qualified
at Higher secondary level and 07% of the respondents are qualified at otherslevel and
remaining 05% of the respondents are qualified at SSLC.




CHART 3

Classification based on the educational qualification of the respondents










Table.5
Classification based on the marital status of the respondents
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
SSLC 2 UG PG Others
5%
12%
33%
43%
7%
p
e
r
c
c
e
n
t
a
g
e



S.No Marital status
No. of.
Respondents
Percentage
1
Un married
26 26
2
married
74 74
Total 100 100


INTREPRETATION:

From the above table it is clear that, 74% of the respondents are married, and remaining
26% of the respondents are Un married.









Chart.5
Classification based on the marital status of the respondents












RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT THE HOW MANY TIME YOU BEEN GIVES
FEEDBACK
26%
74%
single married
S.No Respondent opinion
No. of
Respondents
Percentage
1 Once 60 60%
2 Twice 20 20%
3 Three times 10 10%
4 More than three times 02 02%
5 None 08 08%
Total 100 100

INTREPRETATION:

From the above table it is clear that, 60% of the respondents are Once, 20% of the
respondents are Twice, 10% of the respondents are Three times and 08% of the respondents are
None and remaining 02% of the respondents are More than three times with the many time you
been gives feedback.







RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT THE NEGLECT THE JOB
DUE TO HEALTH PROBLEMS









RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT THE ONLINE FEEDBACK AND SURVEYS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Once Twice Three times More than
three times
None
60%
20%
10%
2%
8%
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e


S.No Respondent opinion No. of Respondents Percentage
1 Yes 80 80%
2 No 20 20%
Total 100 100


INTREPRETATION:

From the above table it is interpreted that, 80% of the respondents are Yes, and remaining
20% of the respondents are No with the online feedback and surveys
.










CHART-12














Yes
80%
No
20%
RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT THE HAVE YOU BEEN OF ONLINE FEEDBACKS
AND ONLINE

S.No Respondent opinion No. of Respondents Percentage
1 Yes 40 40%
2 No 60 60%
Total 100 100


INTREPRETATION:

From the above table it is clear that, 60% of the respondents are No, and remaining 40%
of the respondents are yes with the have you been of online feedbacks and online













0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Yes No
40%
60%
RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT THE APPROXIMATELY, HOW MANY TIMES
HAVE YOU GIVEN FEEDBACKS THROUGH MU SURVEY.

S.No Respondent opinion No. of Respondents Percentage
1 1-2 times 70 70%
2 2-5 times 20 20%
3 Above 5 times 10 10%
Total 100 100

INTREPRETATION:

From the above table it is interpreted that, 70% of the respondents are 1-2 times, 20% of
the respondents are 2-5 times, and remaining 10% of the respondents are Above 5 times with the
approximately, how many times have you given feedbacks through mu survey.
.



















70%
20%
10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
1-2 times 2-5 times Above 5 times
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e

RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT THE OUR FINDS US SURVEY FROM NORMAL
PAPER BASED FEEDBACK.

S.No Respondent opinion No. of Respondents Percentage
1 Good 90 90%
2 Average 03 03%
3 Ok 02 02%
4 Bad 02 02%
5 Difficult 03 03%
Total 100 100

INTREPRETATION:

From the above table it is infers that, 90% of the respondents are Good, 03% of the
respondents are Average, 03% of the respondents are Difficult and 02% of the respondents are
Ok and remaining 02% of the respondents are Bad with the our finds us survey from normal
paper based feedback.




















90%
3%
2% 2%
3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Good Average Ok Bad Difficult
RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT THE FEEL ONLINE AND OFFLINE FEEDBACK
FROM MU SURVEY.

S.No Respondent opinion No. of Respondents Percentage
1 Very good 65 65%
2 Good 21 21%
3 Average 12 12%
4 Bad 02 02%
5 Very bad 0 0%
Total 100 100


INTREPRETATION:

From the above table it is infers that, 65% of the respondents are Very good, 21% of the
respondents are Good, 12% of the respondents are Average and 02% of the respondents are Bad
and remaining 0% of the respondents are Very bad with the feel online and offline feedback from
mu survey.



















0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Very good
Good
Average
Bad
Very bad
65%
21%
12%
2%
0%
percentage
RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT THE MU SURVEY OFFERS YOU A FRIENDLY
SURVERYS.

S.No Respondent opinion No. of Respondents Percentage
1 Yes 76 76%
2 No 24 24%
Total 100 100


INTREPRETATION:

From the above table it is clear that, 76% of the respondents are yes, and remaining 24%
of the respondents are no with the mu survey offers you a friendly surveys.


















76%
24%
Yes No
RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT THE ONLINE SURVEYS IS USEFUL TO PEOPLE.

S.No Respondent opinion No. of Respondents Percentage
1 Always 61 61%
2 Most often 20 20%
3 Often 10 10%
4 Sometime 04 04%
5 Rarely 05 05%
Total 100 100


INTREPRETATION:

From the above table it is clear that, 61% of the respondents are Always, 20% of the
respondents are Most often, 10% of the respondents are Often and 05% of the respondents are
Rarely and remaining 04% of the respondents are Sometime with the online surveys are useful to
people.



















0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Always Most often Often Sometime Rarely
61%
20%
10%
4%
5%
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e

RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT THE MOST INTERESTING PART TOWARD
MUSUREY

S.No Respondent opinion No. of Respondents Percentage
1 Good graphics 22 22%
2 Easy to answer 24 24%
3 Smiles options 20 20%
4 Quick to answer the questions 14 14%
5 One touch and go 10 10%

Comfortable using table phones for
surveys
10 10%
Total 100 100


INTREPRETATION:

From the above table it is clear that, 24% of the respondents are Easy to answer, 22% of
the respondents are Good graphics, 20% of the respondents are Smiles options and 14% of the
respondents are Quick to answer and 10% of the respondents are One touch and go and
remaining 10% of the respondents are Comfortable using table phones for surveys with the
satisfied with the social most interesting part toward musurey
.

















0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Good
graphics
Easy to
answer
Smiles
options
Quick to
answer the
questions
One touch
and go
Comfortable
using table
phones for
surveys
22%
24%
20%
14%
10% 10%
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e


RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT THE long it takes to answer a question.

S.No Respondent opinion
No. of
Respondents
Percentage
1 10 seconds 30 30%
2 5 seconds 32 32%
3 Less than 5 seconds 48 48%
Total 100 100

INTREPRETATION:

From the above table it is clear that, 48% of the respondents are Less than 5 seconds,
32% of the respondents are 5 seconds, and remaining 30% of the respondents are 10 seconds
with the satisfied with long it takes to answer a question.























27%
29%
44%
10 seconds 5 seconds Less than 5 seconds
RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT HANDLING ON MOBILE PHONES

S.No Respondent opinion No. of Respondents Percentage
1 Yes 89 89%
2 No 11 11%
Total 100 100


INTREPRETATION:

From the above table it is clear that, 89% of the respondents are yes, and remaining 11%
of the respondents are No with the handling on mobile phones.




















89%
11%
Yes No
TABLE SHOWING THE OPINION OF THE RESPONDENTS WITH RESPECT TO
THE VARIOUS DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TABLET PHONES AND OTHER
DEVICES TOWARDS MUSURVEY

DEVICE

Easy to handle

Neutral

Hard to handle

Tablet phones
52 45 03
I-phones 39 46 15
Android devices 21 36 43
Desktops 11 21 68
Source: Primary Data

POINT WEIGHTAGE 3 2 1


DEVICE

Easy to
handle

Neutral

Hard to
handle

Total

Avg

Rank

Tablet phones
156 90 03


249


2.49


1
I-phones 117 92 15

224

2.24

2
Android devices 63 72 43

178

1.78

3
Desktops 33 42 68

143

1.43

4

INFERENCE
The above table infers that the company gives more weightagefirst to the difference
between tablet phones and other devices towards musurvey
on the machine then the individual, second to the proper ventilation is maintained, third to the
environment is more adequatable, and fourth to the Machinery layout is proper, fifth to the
illumination of the work place is good, finally to the work place is less crowed and clean. This
shows that the employees are strongly agreed with work environment place gives less emphasis
on the machine then the individual.















0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Tablet phones I phones Android devics Desktops
2.49
2.24
1.78
1.43
w
e
i
g
h
t
e
d

a
v
g

TABLE SHOWING THE OPINION OF THE RESPONDENTS WITH RESPECT TO
THE VARIOUS APPLICATION FUNCATION

SIGNIFICANCE VAROUS
SERVICES

satisfied

neutral

Not satisfied

Easy for handling
67 30 03
Time consumption 56 30 14
Good graphics 51 36 13
Looks formal 60 20 20
Source: Primary Data

POINT WEIGHTAGE 3 2 1


SIGNIFICANCE
VAROUS SERVICES

satisfied

neutral

Not satisfied

Total

Avg

Rank

Easy for handling
201 60 03
264 2.64 1
Time consumption 168 60 14
242 2.42 2
Good graphics 153 72 13
238 2.38 4
Looks formal 180 40 20
240 2.40 3


INFERENCE

The above table infers that the company gives more weightagefirst to the Work load fixed
is satisfactory, second to the My level of job involvement is high, finally to the The performance
appraisal in the organization is satisfactory. This shows that the employees are strongly agreed
with Work load fixed is satisfactory.















0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
TABLE SHOWING THE OPINION OF THE RESPONDENTS WITH RESPECT TO
THE TIME TAKEN FOR TAKING UP A SURVEY


Types of Survey

Less than a
minute

1 to 3
minutes

3 to 5
minutes

5 to 10
minutes

10 minutes
and above

Paper based surveys
01 02 04 51 42
Online surveys 02 13 52 19 14
Offline surveys 10 09 60 15 06
Musurvey 63 07 20 07 03
Telephone surveys 01 08 20 60 11
Other surveys 03 29 21 28 19
Source: Primary Data

POINT WEIGHTAGE 5 4 3 2 1


Types of Survey

Less
than a
minute

1 to 3
minutes

3 to 5
minutes

5 to 10
minutes

10
minutes
and
above

Total

Avg

Rank

Paper based surveys
05 08 12 102 42

169

1.69

6
Online surveys 10 52 156 38 14

270


2.70

3
Offline surveys 50 36 180 30 06

302


3.02

2
Musurvey 315 28 60 14 03
420 4.20 1
Telephone surveys 05 32 60 120 11
228 2.28 5
Other surveys 15 116 63 56 19
269 2.69 4

INFERENCE
The above table infers that the company gives more weightage first to the The
performance appraisal in the organization is satisfactory, finally both of the My level of job
involvement is high and Work load fixed is satisfactory, This shows that the employees are
strongly agreed with The performance appraisal in the organization is satisfactory.









0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT OVERALL SURVEY QUALITY OF MUSURVEY

S.No Respondent opinion No. of Respondents Percentage
1 Excellent 80 80%
2 Very good 10 10%
3 Good 03 03%
4 Average 05 05%
5 Poor 02 02%
Total 100 100


INTREPRETATION:

From the above table it is clear that, 80% of the respondents are Excellent, 10% of the
respondents are Very good, 05% of the respondents are Average, 3% of the respondents are good
and remaining 2% of the respondents are poor with the satisfied with the overall survey quality
of Musurvey.





















0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e

RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT THE OPINION ABOUT OFFLINE SURVEYS

S.No Respondent opinion No. of Respondents Percentage
1 Positive 76 76%
2 Negative 05 05%
3 No comments 19 19%
Total 100 100


INTREPRETATION:

From the above table it is clear that, 76% of the respondents are Positive, 19% of the
respondents are no comments, and remaining 05% of the respondents are Negative with the
satisfied with the opinion about offline surveys.






















RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT THE USEFULLNESS OF OFFLINE AND ONLINE
SURVEYS IN FUTURE


S.No Respondent opinion No. of Respondents Percentage
1 Yes 96 96%
2 No 04 04%
Total 100 100


INTREPRETATION:

From the above table it is clear that, 96% of the respondents are Yes, and 04% of the
respondents are No with the satisfied with the usefulness of offline and online surveys in future.






















RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT THE USAGE OF TABLET PHONE RATINGS

S.No Respondent opinion No. of Respondents Percentage
1 Very good 70 70%
2 Good 26 26%
3 Average 03 03%
4 Bad 01 01%
5 Very bad 0 0%
Total 100 100


INTREPRETATION:

From the above table it is clear that, 70% of the respondents are Very good, 26% of the
respondents are Good, 03% of the respondents are Average, and 01% of the respondents are Bad
and remaining 0% of the respondents are Very bad with the satisfied with the usage of tablet
phone ratings.





















0 10 20 30 40 50 60
SIGNIFICANCE VAROUS SERVICES
Easy for handling
Time consumption
0
60
60
Percentage
RESPONDENT SATISFACTION LEVEL ABOUT THE MUSURVEY RATINGS

S.No Respondent opinion No. of Respondents Percentage
1 One 0 0%
2 Two 0 0%
3 Three 01 01%
4 Four 95 95%
5 Five 04 04%
Total 100 100



INTREPRETATION:

From the above table it is clear that, 95% of the respondents are four rating, 04% of the
respondents are five ratings, 01% of the respondents are three ratings, 0% of the respondents are
Two ratings, and remaining 0% of the respondents are one percentage with the satisfied with
satisfaction level about the musurvey ratings.






0
10
20
30
40
50
60
SIGNIFICANCE VAROUS SERVICES Easy for handling Time consumption
Series1 0 60 60
0
60 60
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e