Steroid-antiviral Treatment Improves the Recovery Rate
in Patients with Severe Bells Palsy Ho Yun Lee, MD, Jae Yong Byun, MD, Moon Suh Park, MD, Seung Geun Yeo, MD, PhD Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea. ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The extent of facial nerve damage is expected to be more severe in higher grades of facial palsy, and the outcome after applying different treatment methods may reveal obvious differences between severe Bells palsy and mild to moderate palsy. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effects of different treatment methods and related prognostic factors in severe to complete Bells palsy. METHODS: This randomized, prospective study was performed in patients with severe to complete Bells palsy. Patients were assigned randomly to treatment with a steroid or a combination of a steroid and an antiviral agent. We collected data about recovery and other prognostic factors. RESULTS: The steroid treatment group (S group) comprised 107 patients, and the combination treatment group (SA group) comprised 99 patients. There were no signicant intergroup differences in age, sex, accompanying disease, period from onset to treatment, or results of an electrophysiology test (P .05). There was a signicant difference in complete recovery between the 2 groups. The recovery (grades I and II) of the S group was 66.4% and that of the SA group was 82.8% (P.010). The SA group showed a 2.6-times higher possibility of complete recovery than the S group, and patients with favorable electromyography showed a 2.2-times higher possibility of complete recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Combined treatment with a steroid and an antiviral agent is more effective in treating severe to complete Bells palsy than steroid treatment alone. 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. The American Journal of Medicine (2013) 126, 336-341 KEYWORDS: Bells Palsy; Electromyography; Electroneurography; Prognosis Bells palsy is a common disease that occurs in 20-30 people of every 100,000 and is the most common cranial neuropathy. 1,2 The reactivation of herpes simplex virus is known to be one of the causes of Bells palsy. 3 For treat- ment of Bells palsy, the use of prednisolone is known to result in high recovery rates and less synkinesis, and there is no doubt that steroid treatment may prevent further nerve damage and is benecial in most cases. 4 Although there is consensus that early use of pred- nisolone is an effective treatment, the use of antiviral agents has led to some controversy. Researchers who are against the use of antiviral agents argue that there is no proof of additional benet. 5,6 However, additional use of valacyclo- vir has been shown to be more effective than steroid treat- ment alone, 7 and patients with severe Bells palsy show a more favorable result with steroid-famciclovir combination therapy. 8 These ndings have led some to advocate for the use of antiviral agents. Other researchers speculate that mixing patients with different severities of palsy leads to inconsistent results, and that patients with paresis have an excellent prognosis, irre- spective of treatment methods. 4 Following a literature review, we hypothesized that the additional effect of antiviral agents would be different ac- cording to the severity of the palsy and that, in cases of severe to complete palsy, there would be a difference in recovery according to treatment methods. Increasing age; onset of treatment; and results of electrophysiologic tests, such as electromyography (EMG) and electroneurography (ENoG), also may inuence the prognosis. Therefore, we Funding: This research was supported by the Kyung Hee University Research Fund in 2011(KHU-2011-1098). Conict of Interest: None. Authorship: All authors had full access to the data and played a role in writing this manuscript. Requests for reprints should be addressed to Seung Geun Yeo, MD, PhD, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, #1 Hoegi-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-702, Korea. E-mail address: yeo2park@gmail.com 0002-9343/$ -see front matter 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.08.020 conducted a prospective study to evaluate systematically the effects of different treatment methods and related prognos- tic factors in severe Bells palsy. METHODS Between September 2008 and Au- gust 2011, we conducted a pro- spective, randomized study of pa- tients who visited our tertiary medical center due to acute uni- lateral peripheral facial paralysis without skin lesions or intraoral lesions occurring within 7 days of presentation. The House-Brack- mann grading system was used to evaluate the severity of facial palsy, and only patients with se- vere to complete Bells palsy (House-Brackmann grade 5) were enrolled. 9 All patients were hospitalized for 1 week. Age, sex, duration from onset to treatment, previous history of facial palsy, and associ- ated symptoms (such as pain around the ear, taste disturbance, and hyperacusis) were documented. Patients were randomized using simple randomization codes generated by Microsoft Excel 2007 (Microsoft Cor- poration, Redmond, Wash) to treatment with a steroid (S group) or a steroid-antiviral combination (SA group). The drug therapy protocol consisted of patients assigned to the same group being treated on the same schedule. Both the researchers and the enrolled patients were blinded to treat- ment assignment. Steroid treatment consisted of methyl- prednisolone for 10 days, 64 mg/d for the rst 4 days, followed by tapering to 48 mg/d for 2 days, 32 mg/d for 2 days, and 16 mg/d for 2 days. Antiviral therapy consisted of oral famciclovir (750 mg/d) for 7 days. Patients in the SA group were administered steroid and famciclovir simultane- ously. An otolaryngologist who did not participate in this study was responsible for patient care during hospitalization and assessed outcomes after 6 months. Bipolar needle EMG and ENoG were performed in all patients. ENoG was conducted during the hospitalization using bipolar cutaneous electrodes. A ground electrode was attached to the arm and a recording electrode was placed in the nasolabial fold. The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) was obtained from the nasalis muscle measured at the suprathreshold stimulation, and measurements were re- ported as the percent maximal amplitude on the side of the lesion/maximal amplitude on the healthy side. Poor ENoG was dened as a loss of amplitude 90%. The EMG was conducted after about 2 weeks from the onset of the facial palsy. The following 6 muscles of ex- pression were examined separately: the frontalis, orbicularis oculi, major zygomatic, orbicularis oris, levator labii supe- rior, and depressor anguli oris. The presence or absence of the blink reex was analyzed simultaneously and classied as favorable or unfavorable by the physical medicine and rehabilitation physician. For follow-up, all patients were instructed to visit the hospital 6 months after hospital discharge. Grades I and II at 6 months from palsy onset were dened as com- plete recovery, and grade III or higher was dened as incomplete recovery. The criteria for exclusion were: Bells palsy that occurred more than 7 days before presentation; Suspected Ramsay-Hunt syn- drome, meningitis, myelitis, or vasculopathy; Patients who could not be ob- served for at least 6 months; The initial use of several differ- ent types of treatments; Age 16 years; Pregnancy or breast-feeding; Uncontrolled diabetes or hyper- tension; Poor general medical conditions in which steroid or an- tiviral therapy cannot be used; Suspicion of Borrelia infection; A tendency for neuropsychiatric disease; and Refusal to participate in the study. The Institutional Review Board of Kyung Hee Univer- sity Hospital approved this study, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. RESULTS A total of 269 patients were enrolled in this study. After excluding 32 patients who did not match the inclusion criteria and 31 patients who did not complete this study due to adverse effects of treatment and did not present for follow-up, 206 patients completed the study (Figure 1). The steroid treatment group (S group) comprised 107 patients, and the combination treatment group (SA group) comprised 99 patients. There was no signicant difference in the distribution of facial grades between the 2 groups (P.498). There were no signicant intergroup differences in age, sex, accompanying disease, period between onset and treat- ment, or results of electrophysiology tests (P .05). There was no signicant difference between the treatment meth- ods with regard to the nal grade and its trend. However, there was a signicant difference in complete recovery between the 2 groups. The recovery (grades I and II) of the CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Although there is consensus that early use of prednisolone is effective, pre- scription of antiviral agents remains controversial. A combination steroid/antiviral treat- ment was more effective than steroid alone in patients with severe Bells palsy. Clinicians should consider initiating combination therapy with an inert ste- roid and an antiviral of choice within 1 week of the onset of high-grade Bells palsy. 337 Lee et al Steroid-Antiviral Treatment in Severe Bells Palsy SA group was 82.8% and that of the S group was 66.4% (P.010) (Table 1). Univariate analysis was performed using previously known prognostic factors in addition to the treatment meth- ods (Table 2). The prognostic factors predicting incomplete recovery were steroid treatment and unfavorable EMG re- sults, and the odds ratios for incomplete recovery were 2.0 and 1.6, respectively. Multivariate analysis was performed on the identied prognostic factors (Table 3). The probability of complete recovery was 2.6 times higher in the SA group than in the S group, and the odds ratio for complete recovery in patients with favorable EMG results was 2.2. DISCUSSION Additional antiviral treatment in Bells palsy is based on the hypothesis that herpes simplex virus infection may cause inammation of the facial nerve. Theoretically, the infec- tious agents are eradicated by antiviral treatment, and swell- ing of the facial nerve is reduced by corticosteroids. 6 How- ever, antiviral agents cannot actually destroy virus that has already replicated, because these drugs prevent viral repli- cation by interfering with viral DNA polymerase. In this respect, Hato et al reported the importance of early admin- istration of the valacyclovir and prednisolone. 7,10 The 3 commonly used antivirals are acyclovir, famciclo- vir, and valacyclovir. Although acyclovir is one of the most commonly used antiviral agents, it has some limitations. Patients must take acyclovir 5 times daily because it has a very low oral bioavailability (10%-20%), and correct ad- ministration is difcult to monitor because the drug is easily compromised if taken with food. 11,12 Famciclovir, a prodrug of penciclovir, is known to have excellent oral bioavailabil- ity (60%-75%) and longer intracellular half-life than acy- clovir and is not affected by concurrent food intake. 8 Vala- cyclovir, a prodrug of acyclovir, is known to have greater bioavailability compared with acyclovir and yields similar plasma concentrations with only twice-daily dosing. 13,14 In this study, we demonstrated that in severe to complete palsy, that is equal to or higher than grade 5, famciclovir treatment plus steroid treatment signicantly increased the chance of recovery. However, one important limitation of this study was the potential risk of imbalance by simple randomization, the fact that no signicant differences were shown in age, sex, and other inuencing factors between 2 groups may imply that potential risks of bias were mini- mally increased by using simple randomization. Figure 1 Overview of patient enrollment. 338 The American Journal of Medicine, Vol 126, No 4, April 2013 Different researchers have reported different conclusions about whether combination treatment is effective in Bells palsy, and it is often difcult to come to a rm conclusion (Table 4, Figure 2). One recent study reported that physicians discussed the merits, drawbacks, and the cost of additional antiviral treat- ment with patients, and after this information was provided, patients chose the combination therapy. 18 Oral antivirals are known to be well tolerated if admin- istered at standard doses, providing that patients are kept well hydrated. Side effects of antiviral agents occur in 10% to 20% of all cases, and the most common symptoms are nausea, vomiting, and headache. The combination therapy for Ramsay-Hunt syndrome is justied and essential given the possibility of a lifelong paralysis. 19,20 This applies equally to Bells palsy as one of the other acute peripheral facial palsies. The relatively low chance of life-threatening major side effects makes combination treat- ment appropriate for severe Bells palsy, in which nerve damage is expected to be severe. However, we do not endorse indiscriminate use of anti- viral agents. One previous study speculated that the initial grade is not a signicant predictor of prognosis, 21 whereas others reported that a higher initial House-Brackmann grade reduces the probability of satisfactory recovery. 22 Our nd- ings were consistent with those previously reported, and indicated that combination therapy was effective in patients with severe to complete facial palsy. Further validation, however, is required in patients with mild to moderate Bells palsy. Larger prospective clinical trials are required to validate our results, because it may have a ripple effect in clinical practice. The detection of spontaneous brillation on needle EMG is known as a sign predicting unfavorable outcome. 23,24 An unfavorable EMG result was reported as one of the poor prognostic factors in recurrent facial palsy. 25 Taken to- gether, EMG is a reliable diagnostic tool that physicians can use to predict prognosis. In addition, we found that age and onset of treatment did not signicantly inuence recovery. There is controversy about the effect of age on prognosis. Previously, age was reported as a parameter that signicantly inuenced the nal recovery. 1 Others have assumed that increasing age reduces the probability of a satisfactory recovery because of periph- eral vascular degeneration. 26 In contrast, another study re- ported that age above 50 years did not signicantly inu- ence the long-term prognosis of Bells palsy. 22 Consistent with that study, a trend test showed no signicant differ- ences between age and recovery. 27 We assumed that these different studies had different results because gerontological problems might act as a confounding factor, and sophisti- cated history-taking and statistical analysis is required in order to compensate. In this study, we found that the onset of treatment also was a nonsignicant factor in the prognosis of Bells palsy. Based on treatment within 3 days, early treatment did not affect recovery signicantly (Table 2). Although Hato et al provided the theoretical background for the use of early combination treatment, they did not clearly show a differ- ence in effect according to the onset of treatment and Table 1 Patient Characteristics Variable Steroid Only Combination Therapy P Value Total n (%) 107 (51.9) 99 (48.1) Age Mean SD 48.6 15.1 46.7 16.2 .381 Range 16-77 16-76 Sex, n (%) Male 51 (47.7) 50 (50.5) .780 Female 56 (52.3) 49 (49.5) EMG, n (%) Favorable 85 (79.4) 75 (75.8) .616 Unfavorable 22 (20.6) 24 (24.2) ENoG, n (%) Poor 5 (4.7) 9 (9.1) .271 Good 102 (95.3) 90 (90.9) Onset of treatment, n (%) Within 3 days 84 (79.2) 67 (67.7) .081 3-7 days 22 (20.8) 32 (32.3) Final facial grade, n (%) Mean SD 2.1 1.1 1.9 0.8 .216 I 42 (39.3) 31 (31.3) .221 II 29 (27.1) 51 (51.5) III 26 (24.3) 12 (12.1) IV 7 (6.5) 5 (5.1) V 2 (1.9) 0 (0.0) VI 1 (0.9) 0 (0.0) Recovery rate (%) 66.4 82.8 .010 EMG electromyography; ENoG electroneurography. Table 2 Univariate Analysis for Incomplete Recovery Condition Odds Ratios (95% Condence Interval) P Value Steroid only treatment 2.0 (1.2-3.3) .010 Unfavorable EMG 1.6 (1.0-2.6) .048 Poor ENoG 0.9 (0.4-2.1) .801 Onset of treatment within 3 days 0.9 (0.5-1.6) .728 Age 60 years 1.4 (0.8-2.4) .262 EMG electromyography; ENoG electroneurography. Table 3 Results of Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis for Complete Recovery Variable Odds Ratios (95% Condence Interval) P Value Favorable EMG 2.2 (1.1-4.5) .034 Steroid-antiviral treatment 2.6 (1.3-5.1) .006 EMG electromyography. 339 Lee et al Steroid-Antiviral Treatment in Severe Bells Palsy only highlighted the merits of combination treatment. 7 In fact, in their earlier study, they reported that all patients who were treated with acyclovir and prednisolone within 3 days of onset recovered completely; however, that study had limited signicance because it was a retrospec- tive study. 28 Consistent with our study, others have as- sumed that the onset of treatment is not a signicant prognostic factor. 18 With 7 days classied as a delayed start of treatment, another report demonstrated that there was no statistically signicant difference in recovery. 22 Therefore, physicians should take into consideration that delayed treatment does not always lead to poor recovery, and combination treat- ment increases the possibility of recovery in severe to com- plete Bells palsy irrespective of onset, at least within 7 days. Clinicians should consider combination therapy with inert steroid and antiviral of choice in individuals with high-grade Bells palsy within 1 week of onset. In con- clusion, steroid plus antiviral treatment is more effective in treating severe to complete Bells palsy than steroid treatment alone. References 1. Peitersen E. Bells palsy: the spontaneous course of 2,500 peripheral facial nerve palsies of different etiologies. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2002:549:4-30. 2. Yanagihara N. Incidence of Bells palsy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1988;137:3-4. 3. Murakami S, Mizobuchi M, Nakashiro Y, et al. Bell palsy and herpes simplex virus: identication of viral DNA in endoneural uid and muscle. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:27-30. 4. Linder TE, Abdelkafy W, Cavero-Vanek S. The management of peripheral facial nerve palsy: paresis versus paralysis and sources of ambiguity in study designs. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31:319- 327. 5. Sullivan FM, Swan IR, Donnan PT, et al. Early treatment with pred- nisolone or acyclovir in Bells palsy. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1598- 1607. Figure 2 A Forest plot of data from recent studies. Table 4 Summary of the Findings of Recent Studies in Which Antiviral Agents Were Used to Treat Bells Palsy Authors Steroid (Initial Dose) Antiviral (Initial Dose) Summary of Results Follow-up Period Axelsson et al, 2012 15 Prednisolone (60 mg/d) Valacyclovir (1000 mg/d) Prednisolone enhanced the complete recovery rate. Valacyclovir had no additional signicant effect. 12 months Minnerop et al, 2008 8 Prednisolone (1 mg/kg/d) Famciclovir (750 mg/d) Combination treatment should be considered for patients with severe Bells palsy. 3 months Engstrm et al, 2008 17 Prednisolone (60 mg/d) Valacyclovir (1000 mg/d) Prednisolone hastened complete recovery. Valacyclovir was ineffective, and combined steroid/ antiviral therapy was no better than the steroid alone. 12 months Yeo et al, 2008 16 Prednisolone (1 mg/kg per day, maximally 80 mg/d) Acyclovir (2400 mg/d) No benet of acyclovir was denitely established. 6 months Hato et al, 2007 7 Prednisolone (60 mg/d) Valacyclovir (1000 mg/d) Early combined use of valacyclovir and prednisone was effective, especially in those with severe to complete palsy. 6 months 340 The American Journal of Medicine, Vol 126, No 4, April 2013 6. Lockhart P, Daly F, Pitkethly M, et al. Antiviral treatment for Bells palsy (idiopathic facial paralysis). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; 7:CD001869. 7. Hato N, Yamada H, Kohno H, et al. Valacyclovir and prednisolone treatment for Bells palsy: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-con- trolled study. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28:408-413. 8. Minnerop M, Herbst M, Fimmers R, et al. Bells palsy: combined treatment of famciclovir and prednisone is superior to prednisone alone. J Neurol. 2008;255:1726-1730. 9. House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolarynogol Head Neck Surg. 1985;93:146-147. 10. Wagstaff AJ, Faulds D, Goa KL. Aciclovir. A reappraisal of its antiviral activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efcacy. Drugs. 1994;47:153-205. 11. De Diego JI, Prim MP, De Sarri MJ, et al. Idiopathic facial paralysis: a randomized, prospective, and controlled study using single-dose prednisone versus acyclovir three times daily. Laryngoscope. 1998; 108:573-575. 12. De Miranda P, Blum MR. Pharmacokinetics of acyclovir after intra- venous and oral administration. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1983;12: 29-37. 13. Kawaguchi K, Inamura H, Abe Y, et al. Reactivation of herpes simplex virus type 1 and varicella-zoster virus and therapeutic effects of com- bination therapy with prednisolone and valacyclovir in patients with Bells palsy. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:147-156. 14. Axelsson S, Lindberg S, Stjernquist-Desatnik A. Outcome of treatment with valacyclovir and prednisone in patients with Bells palsy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003;112:197-201. 15. Axelsson S, Berg T, Jonsson L, Engstrm M, Kanerva M, Stjernquist- Desatnik A. Bells palsythe effect of prednisolone and/or valaciclo- vir versus placebo in relation to baseline severity in a randomised controlled trial. Clin Otolaryngol. 2012;37(4):283-290. 16. Yeo SG, Lee YC, Park DC, et al. Acyclovir plus steroid vs steroid alone in the treatment of Bells palsy. Am J Otolaryngol. 2008;29:163- 166. 17. Engstrm M, Berg T, Stjernquist-Desatnik A, et al. Prednisolone and valaciclovir in Bells palsy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo- controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:993-1000. 18. Van der Veen EL, Rovers MM, de Ru JA, et al. A small effect of adding antiviral agents in treating patients with severe Bell palsy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;146:353-357. 19. Uscategui T, Dore C, Chamberlain IJ, et al. Antiviral therapy for Ramsay Hunt syndrome (herpes zoster oticus with facial palsy) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;8(4):CD006851. 20. de Ru JA, van Benthem PP. Combination therapy is preferable for patients with Ramsay Hunt syndrome. Otol Neurotol. 2011;32:852- 855. 21. Takemoto N, Horii A, Sakata Y, et al. Prognostic factors of peripheral facial palsy: multivariate analysis followed by receiver operating char- acteristic and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Otol Neurotol. 2011;32:1031- 1036. 22. Mantsopoulos K, Psillas G, Psychogios G, et al. Predicting the long- term outcome after idiopathic facial nerve paralysis. Otol Neurotol. 2011;32:848-851. 23. Sittel C, Stennert E. Prognostic value of electromyography in acute peripheral facial nerve palsy. Otol Neurotol. 2001;22:100-104. 24. Grosheva M, Wittekindt C, Guntinas-Lichius O. Prognostic value of electroneurography and electromyography in facial palsy. Laryngo- scope. 2008;118:394-397. 25. Chung DH, Park DC, Byun JY, et al. Prognosis of patients with recurrent facial palsy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269:61-66. 26. Danielidis V, Skevas A, Van Cauwenberge P, et al. A comparative study of age and degree of facial nerve recovery in patients with Bells palsy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1999;256:520-522. 27. Yeo SW, Lee DH, Jun BC, et al. Analysis of prognostic factors in Bells palsy and Ramsay Hunt syndrome. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2007; 34:159-164. 28. Hato N, Matsumoto S, Kisaki H, et al. Efcacy of early treatment of Bells palsy with oral acyclovir and prednisolone. Otol Neurotol. 2003;24:948-951. 341 Lee et al Steroid-Antiviral Treatment in Severe Bells Palsy