ASSESSMENT TYPE 1: INVESTIGATIONS FOLIO

SOURCE EVALUATION
SCHOOL NUMBER: 893
Name of s!"e#: TING PING YEN
G$o!%: SG3
T&'e: S(o!'" IVF )e !se" &# se* se'e+&o#,
So!$+e -%e
(e.g. internet, journal, newspaper article, book, video):
internet
.e- sea$+( /o$"s0%($ases:
IVF Sex Selection
I#fo$ma&o# So!$+e (correctly or!atted reerence) :
"ritis# $edical %ournal ("$%), Use and misuse of preimplantation genetic testing, accessed &' $arc#
&()*, (%:00///1)m21+om0+o#e#0333045630436.
E7a'!a&o# S!"e# Comme#s
Suitability
t#e degree to w#ic# a source
addresses t#e issue
+#e source is suitable because it is a !edical journal. It contains
latest original researc# w#ic# is relevant to !y researc# ,uestion.
Bias
reers to prejudiced or partial
viewpoint t#at would aect
so!eone-s interpretation or t#e
issue
+#is website is less bias because it is not a co!!ercial site. It is a
!edical journal w#ic# does not sell any products.
Accuracy
reers to t#e trut#ulness and
correctness o t#e inor!ation
+#e source is accurate because t#is website is an international peer
reviewed !edical journal. +#e source is written by acade!ic
clinicians.
Credibility
t#e trustwort#iness (credentials,
education, experience, etc) o t#e
source
+#is website is #ig#ly credible because it #as a logo w#ic# indicates
t#is source is publis#ed by an organi.ation. +#is website also
provided t#e contact ino o t#e organi.ation.
Reason(s) to use or reject the
source
+#e sources in t#is website s#ould be used because it is suitable,
less bias, accurate and #ig#ly credible.
Assessment (AE1, I2)
8o$" Co!#: ))/
ASSESSMENT TYPE 1: INVESTIGATIONS FOLIO
SOURCE EVALUATION
SCHOOL NUMBER: 893
Name of s!"e#: TING PING YEN
G$o!%: SG3
T&'e: S(o!'" IVF )e !se" &# se* se'e+&o#,
So!$+e -%e
(e.g. internet, journal, newspaper article, book, video):
internet
.e- sea$+( /o$"s0%($ases:
In vitro ertili.ation (IVF)
I#fo$ma&o# So!$+e (correctly or!atted reerence) :
0.1.0.$. $edical 2ncyclopedia, In vitro fertilization (IVF), accessed &3 $arc# &()*,
#ttp:44www.ncbi.nl!.ni#.gov4pub!ed#ealt#4about4.
E7a'!a&o# S!"e# Comme#s
Suitability
t#e degree to w#ic# a source
addresses t#e issue
+#e source is suitable because t#e inor!ation provided can be used
in !y report. It contains t#e reviews o clinical eectiveness researc#
w#ic# is relevant to !y researc# ,uestion.
Bias
reers to prejudiced or partial
viewpoint t#at would aect
so!eone-s interpretation or t#e
issue
+#is website is less bias because it is not a co!!ercial site. It
provides inor!ation or consu!ers and clinicians on prevention
and treat!ent o diseases but it does not sell any products to t#e
consu!ers.
Accuracy
reers to t#e trut#ulness and
correctness o t#e inor!ation
+#e source is accurate because t#is website is a service provided by
t#e 5ational 6enter or "iotec#nology Inor!ation (56"I) at t#e
7.S. 5ational 8ibrary o $edicine (58$). It is t#e largest !edical
library in t#e world.
Credibility
t#e trustwort#iness (credentials,
education, experience, etc) o t#e
source
+#is website is #ig#ly credible because it #as a logo w#ic# indicates
t#is source is publis#ed by an organi.ation. +#is website also
provided t#e contact ino o t#e organi.ation.
Reason(s) to use or reject the
source
+#e sources in t#is website s#ould be used because it is suitable,
less bias, accurate and #ig#ly credible.
Assessment (AE1, I2)
8o$" Co!#: )/3