Personnel TLD monitors, their

calibration and response

by

Antonia Savva




A dissertation submitted to the Department of Physics,
University of Surrey, in partial fulfilment of the degree of
Master of Science in Radiation Detection and Instrumentation





Department of Physics
Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences
University of Surrey


September 2010

Antonia Savva 2010

Abstract

Personal dosimeters are worn by workers when they are exposed to radiation
to make sure that a reference limit is not exceeded. Thermoluminescence dosimeters
(TLDs) emit light when they are heated. By measuring this light the dose can be
calculated. The reader and batch calibration are carried out first. CDs are selected
(falling within the range of 0.94-1.06) and by using them, the RCF is automatically
found (0.034127 and 0.027526) for the two different TLD elements in TLD cards.
FDs are also selected (within 0.7-1.3). ECCs are calculated automatically by the
reader and follow a normal distribution with a mean value of 1.0010.001. The
repeatability of the TLDs is measured to be about 1%, lower than the threshold
(2%). The maximum Coefficient of Variation is calculated to be 1.7% where the
limit is 10%. The curve of the energy response has similar shape to the curve given by
the manufacturer. For low energies two different filters are used and the responses are
compared showing that the energy dependence of the TL materials is a function of the
energy spectrum and not just a function of the nominal value of the energy used to
produce this energy spectrum. The angular response is found almost constant (up to
about 70) for both directions and it is reduced to about half its value when the angle
becomes 90. Small difference in the angular response in two directions is due to the
change in the irradiation distance as the TLDs are closer and further away in the x-ray
tube at large angles. The ISO requirement is met for all angles except at 90.








ii
Acknowledgements

I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my supervisor Dr. Stelios
Christophides for giving me this opportunity to carry out my work in Nicosias
General Hospital and for trusting me with the assignment of this very interesting
subject, as well as for his ongoing interest, guidance and support throughout my
projects application.

I am also extremely thankful to Medical Physicists Dimitris Kaolis, Christos
Papaeustathiou and Georgiana Kokona for their essential help during the experimental
part of this work as well as their invaluable assistance in order to overcome crucial
problems that occurred. In addition my deepest appreciation goes to all the Medical
Physicists of the Department for their help and support.

I also cannot express enough gratitude to my family and friends who believed
in me and encouraged me throughout my whole year of studies in Guildford.

Last but not least, my truthful thanks go out to Dr. Paul Sellin for his support
and interest during the length of my course.












iii












To my family..
















iv
Table of Contents

ABSTRACT.................................................................................................................II
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................... III
1. ................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION
2. .............................................................................................................. 3 THEORY
2.1. ............................ 3 THERMOLUMINESCENCE DOSIMETRY - A GENERAL MODEL
2.2. .................................................................................................. 4 TLD READER
2.3. ............................................................. 6 CHARACTERISTICS OF TL MATERIALS
2.4. .................................................................................... 8 TL PROPERTIES OF LIF
2.5. ........................................ 12 ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF TLD100
2.6. ................................................................................................ 13 CALIBRATION
2.6.1. ............................... 13 Batch Calibration - Element Correction Coefficient
2.6.2. ...................................................................... 15 Reader Calibration Factor
3. ...................................................................... 16 MATERIALS AND METHODS
3.1. ................................................................................................... 16 MATERIALS
3.2. ............................................................................................ 17 METHODOLOGY
3.2.1. ......................................... 17 Selection of Time Temperature Profile (TTP)
3.2.2. ............................................. 18 Selection of Calibration Dosimeters (CDs)
3.2.3. ................................... 18 Calculation of Reader Calibration Factor (RCF)
3.2.4.
................................................................................... 19
Calculation of the Element Correction Coefficients (ECCs) and Selection
of Field Dosimeters (FDs)
3.2.5. .............................................................................. 19 Irradiation procedure
3.2.6. ............................................................................................ 20 Repeatability
v
3.2.7. .................................................................................. 20 Energy dependence
3.2.8. ................................................................................. 21 Angular dependence
4. ........................................................................ 22 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1. ........................................ 22 SELECTION OF CALIBRATION DOSIMETERS (CDS)
4.2. ............................ 22 CALCULATION OF READER CALIBRATION FACTOR (RCF)
4.3.
................................................................. 23
CALCULATION OF ELEMENT CORRECTION COEFFICIENTS (ECCS) AND
SELECTION OF FIELD DOSIMETERS (FDS)
4.4. ............................................................................................ 24 REPEATABILITY
4.5. ................................................................................... 26 ENERGY DEPENDENCE
4.6. ................................................................................ 29 ANGULAR DEPENDENCE
5. .................................................................................................. 31 CONCLUSION
APPENDIX I EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS............................................... 33
HARSHAW BICRON MODEL 6600E AUTOMATIC TLD WORKSTATION................... 33
INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONS [8] ............................................................................. 34
SPECIFICATION OF MAMMOGRAPHY UNIT (PLANMED SOPHIE CLASSIC) [22]....... 35
SPECIFICATIONS OF MEDCAL EIDOS (RADIOGRAPHY UNIT) [23-24] ........................ 36
SPECIFICATIONS OF CS SOURCE [25]
137
..................................................................... 37
DECAY CHAIN OF THE CS SOURCE [26]
137
................................................................. 37
SPECIFICATIONS OF ION CHAMBER IONEX 2511/3 [27]............................................ 38
SPECIFICATIONS FOR RADCALL ION CHAMBERS [28]................................................. 38
APPENDIX II ROW DATA .................................................................................. 40
RAW DATA FOR THE SELECTION OF CDS AND FDS AND THEIR CALIBRATION FACTORS
40
DATA FOR THE REPEATABILITY ................................................................................ 45
vi
vii
DATA FOR THE ENERGY RESPONSE........................................................................... 46
DATA FOR THE ANGULAR DEPENDENCE ................................................................... 48
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS.................................................................. 50
REFERENCES........................................................................................................... 51
1. Introduction

Radiation dosimetry is defined as the measurement, usually, of the absorbed
dose, or other relevant quantities like KERMA, exposure or equivalent dose, which is
produced due to the interaction of the ionizing radiation with a material. That
measurement can be achieved using a dosimeter [1]. A dosimeter with its reader is
called a dosimetry system [2].

External dosimetry is a measure of absorbed doses, produced from radiation
sources, which are outside of the body of the exposed worker. For this kind of doses a
personal dosimeter is used, which is usually called badge, and has to be worn by the
worker every time that he/she is exposed to the radiation, in order to make sure that a
reference limit is not exceeded. If a worker works with sources which are not sealed,
then the radioactive material gets into his/her body and absorbed by tissues or organs
in the body. Therefore, internal doses should also be measured, using specific
monitors, with the aim of calculating the total effective dose to the worker from
internal and external exposures [3].

Absolute dosimeters are used in order to measure directly the dose without the
need of a calibration in a known radiation field (e.g. calorimeters) [1]. On the other
hand, secondary or relative dosimeters provide indirect measurement of dose but have
to be calibrated using a primary (absolute) dosimeter at reference conditions. An
example of secondary dosimeters is the TLDs (thermoluminescence dosimeters)
which are normally calibrated using an ion chamber dosimeter [4].

TLDs have been developed significantly over the years and a lot of materials
were studied to see if they are suitable for applications for different areas in dosimetry
[4]. TL materials store energy inside their structure when they are irradiated, as
electrons and holes are trapped in trapping centers due to defects. When that material
is heated, electrons and holes recombine, at luminescence centers, and thus light is
emitted. The light is measured using a PMT (photomultiplier tube) inside the reader
device [5]. The photons which are emitted are in the visible region and they comprise
the TL signal. Preferably, one photon is emitted from each trap center. Therefore, the
1
measured signal is an index of the number of electron/hole pairs and it is proportional
to the absorbed dose [6].

TLDs are mainly used for personal monitoring of workers who are exposed to
radiation that is higher than 3/10 of the dose equivalent limits. The individual
monitoring of those workers is essential in order to make sure that the limit of the
equivalent dose does not exceed the maximum permissible dose [4]. They are used to
determine the dose of an individual at a specific depth of his/her body, most of the
times at 0.07 and 10 mm. At 0.07 mm the effective dose of the workers skin
(Hp(0.07)) and at 10 mm the dose of the organs inside the body (Hp(10)) are
measured (see figure 1.1). Additionally, at depth 3 mm the dose in the eyes of a
worker is calculated [3]. TLDs can also be used for environmental, neutron and
clinical monitoring. Moreover in vivo techniques, in radiotherapy as well as in
diagnostic radiation measurements. Furthermore, for dating of materials and for
analysis of the meteorites [4].

Figure 1.1: External exposure Estimation of dose at depths equal to 0.07 and 10 mm [3].

In this project, the TLDs used for individual monitoring are fabricated from
LiF and doped with Mg and Ti, will be examined. Firstly, their calibration will take
place and then their repeatability, their energy and angular response will be studied.
2
2. Theory

2.1. Thermoluminescence Dosimetry - A general model

Luminescence is a process in which, a material that is irradiated, absorbs
energy which is then emitted as a photon in the visible region of the electromagnetic
spectrum. Thermoluminescence is a form of luminescence in which heat is given to
the material which results in light emission [4].

In a crystal, electrons (e
-
) are found in the valence band (see figure 2.1.1a).
When the material is irradiated, e
-
move from the valence to the conduction band
where they move freely. Therefore, a hole (h) remains in the valence band (absence of
electron) which can also move inside the crystal. Due to impurities and doping of the
crystal, e
-
and h traps are created in the band gap between the valence and the
conduction band. Thus e
-
and h are trapped at defects (figure 2.1.1b). If these traps are
deep, the electrons and holes will not have enough energy to escape. By heating the
crystal their energy is increased, they leave the traps and recombine at luminescence
centers. As a result light is then emitted (figure 2.1.1c) [4-5].

(a) (b) (c)
Figure 2.1.1: The mechanism of TL dosimetry [5].

A TLD can be considered as an integrating detector in which the number of e
-

and h, which are trapped, is the number of the e
-
/h pairs which are produced during
the exposure. Preferably, every trapped e
-
/h emits one photon. Consequently, the
number of emitted photons is equal to the number of charge pairs, which are also
proportional to the dose which is absorbed by the crystal [6].
3
The probability of a charge carrier to escape per unit time (p) is given by the
Randall-Wilkins theory using the equation:

/
1
E kT
p e o
t

= = (1)
where,
= the mean half-life of a charge carrier in a trap
= the frequency factor
E= the energy of the trap (eV)
k= the Boltzmans constant = 8.62 *10
-5
eV/
0
K
T= the Temperature (
0
K)
By increasing the temperature, the escape rate is increased and the mean half-life of e
-
/h is reduced. This rate, as it is increased, reaches a maximum at a specific
temperature and then is rapidly reduced. But as the intensity of the emitted light is
proportional to this rate, it could be realized, that there would be a creation of a peak
in the graph of intensity versus temperature, called glow peak, and the graph called
glow curve. Both are explained in detail in subsection 2.4 [1].

2.2. TLD Reader

A schematic diagram of a TLD reader is shown in figure 2.2.1. The dosimeter
is placed on a tray (support made of metal) inside the chamber. There it is heated by a
heating coil, which is in good contact with the dosimeter and the tray. A thermocouple
is also used to measure the temperature of the heating cycle in the chamber. Nitrogen
gas is used to reduce the signal produced from impurities in the air [5].

Due to the thermoluminescence effect, light is emitted and as it passes through
optical filters, it enters the PMT through the light guide and then it is measured. As
the output of the PMT is proportional to the number of photons which are generated,
it becomes also proportional to the absorbed dose when the output is integrated.
Instead of integration, pulse counting can take place. That means that the output is
converted into pulses which are counted. The reader device is connected to a PC and
the measured results are either stored in the hard disk of the PC or printed out [5].

4

Figure 2.2.1: A TLD reader [5].

The PMT consists of a photocathode which converts the incident light into
current. That current is amplified inside the PMT which gives an output that can
easily be measured [6]. Most photocathodes have a peak sensitivity of about 400nm
wavelength. So it is very important to choose a suitable TL material (phosphor) which
generates light in the blue region of the electromagnetic spectrum. The selection of a
suitable material will be discussed in section 2.3. A good reader should have a large
transmission of light and be able to measure different TL materials [5]. PMTs with
low response are mostly used for the detection of low levels of light from TL
materials [7].

There are more than one ways to heat a TL material (dosimeter). In figure
2.2.1 the tray and dosimeters are in contact with a heating coil (element). The increase
in the temperature can also be produced by an electric current. These methods are
called ohmic heating and are the most commonly used methods [4].

Another way to rise the temperature is a non-contact method. This method
could include a hot air heating method (hot nitrogen gas), radiofrequency (RF) heating
or optical heating method. In the RF heating the heat is produced from the current of
the RF induction heating spool. In the optical method the increase in temperature is
due to a heating lamp. By using the non-contact methods the reproducibility of the
5
heat is easier and there is no contamination produced between reader and dosimeter.
Nevertheless, it is simpler to control the temperature using a contact method [4].

More details for the Harshaw (model 6600E) reader used for this project and
its specifications are shown in Appendix I.

2.3. Characteristics of TL materials

Although there are more than 2000 TL materials available, only 8 are used as
they are more appropriate for measuring radiation dose. Four of them have low atomic
number (Z) and are characterized as tissue equivalent materials, as they have a
respond similar to that of human tissue. These are lithium fluoride (LiF), lithium
borate (Li
2
B
4
O
7
), beryllium oxide (BeO) and magnesium borate (MgB
4
O
7
). They are
used for medical application as well as for personnel monitoring for industrial
applications. The other four materials over-respond due to their higher Z. Thus, they
have higher sensitivity and are characterized as non-tissue equivalent materials. These
materials are calcium sulphate (CaSO
4
), calcium fluoride (CaF
2
), aluminum oxide
(Al
2
O
3
) and magnesium orthosilicate (Mg
2
SiO
4
) and are used for environmental
monitoring [7].

Different commercial TLDs holders (badges) are shown in figure 2.3.1. The
personal information of the worker is outside of the dosimeter. Their shape makes
sure that they are correctly placed inside their holder. It is very important that a
worker wears correctly the badge as well as keeping it clear and dry [3].

TL materials are not ideal for measuring dose. Many factors have to be taken
into account in order to find the most suitable material. The availability is very
important as well as the stability of its produced signal. A low fading rate is important
(lower than 5% per month) as well as simple glow curves with a plain anneal heating
cycle. Although the sensitivity of a tissue equivalent material is not very high, it can
be increased by adding impurities called activators. As there are more impurities in
the material, more traps are included and thus more light is emitted during
thermoluminescence process. Therefore the efficiency of the material is increased.
6

Figure 2.3.1: Commercially available TLDs holders [3].

Except for high sensitivity and efficiency, a low variation in the signal of the
background is needed with the aim of measuring low dose thresholds with high
accuracy (doses lower than 100 Gy). Moreover, a flat energy response over a large
range of energies is required [7]. An ideal dosimeter should have a linear response
over a large range of doses and its response should not be affected from the dose rate.
Their response variation due to the different angles of the incident radiation to the
dosimeter should be well known. Finally, the dosimeter must have small dimensions
in order to be able to measure point doses with high spatial resolution [2].

The most widely used material is the LiF with added magnesium and titanium.
TLD100 is LiF:Mg,Ti which consists of 92.5% of
7
Li and 7.5% of
6
Li. This is the TL
material used in this project. Also the TLD600, with more
6
Li in it, and TLD700, with
only
7
Li, are available. Their sensitivity to -rays is the same but it is different to
neutrons, as
6
Li have high thermal neutron absorption coefficient. The properties of
the TLD100 are discussed in section 2.4.

MgB
4
O
7
has similar behavior as LiF with higher sensitivity (5-10 times higher
than LiF). Its disadvantage is that an additional anneal irradiation is needed to reduce
the fading as it is very sensitive to light. Li
2
B
4
O
7
has less sensitivity compared with
LiF (1/10th of LiF) and is hydroscopic. BeO is a more tissue equivalent material that
LiF with almost the same sensitivity, but toxic and very sensitive to light [7]. Table
2.3.1 summarizes the properties of the different TL materials.
7
Table 2.3.1: TL properties of different materials [7].
Material
Sensitivity per
unit mass
Dose Threshold
(Gy)
Fading factor
(5 loss at 20
0
C)
Energy
response ratio
LiF- TLD100 1 50 ~5y
-1
1.3
BeO 0.2-1 <100 5(in 1 to 5m) 0.9-1.0
Li
2
B
4
O
7
:Mn
(TLD800)
<0.1 500 ~5 (in 3m) 0.9
Li
2
B
4
O
7
:Mn
(general)
0.2 50-100 <5m
-1
0.9
MgB
4
O
7
:Dy 5-10 20-50 <5m
-1
1.3-2.4

2.4. TL properties of LiF

LiF is an alkali halide with atomic number equal to 8.2 (close to 7.4 of the
human tissue) and is widely used for personnel monitoring. It can be found in many
forms namely chips or pellets, single crystals, rods, powders, ribbons and gel.
TLD100 which is highly used it is a LiF crystal doped with magnesium and titanium.
Magnesium is used to increase the number of traps in the lattice and titanium is used
in order to increase the number of luminescence centers. TLD100 is produced by
melting lithium fluoride, lithium cryolite, magnesium fluoride and lithium titanium
fluoride. It has high sensitivity and its emission peak is at 400nm which is within the
blue region of the electromagnetic spectrum. Thus, the emitted light matches the
response of the photocathode of the PMT [4].

Due to the traps in the crystal of LiF, the TL intensity, as a function of the
temperature, has a number of glow peaks. Initially it is raised exponentially, reaches a
maximum and then reduces producing a peak. As there are many traps, many glow
peaks are produced and the graph is called glow curve. The height and the number of
the peaks in a glow curve of a crystal depend on the number of the impurities and
defects of the material and its thermal history.

In the glow curve of TLD100 there are 6 peaks at different temperatures (up to
300
0
C) which are shown in figure 2.4.1. The main peak used for the measurement of
8
dose is the 5
th
peak. The dosimetry peak should have large enough temperature in
order not to be affected by the room temperature but also not to high in order not to be
affected by the black body emission of the TLD disc. The half-life of each peak is also
shown on figure 2.4.1.

Figure 2.4.1: Glow curve of TLD100 (A) after pre-heating procedure (B) The half-lives of each
peak can also be seen. [4]

The problem is that at low temperatures the fading is high. Thus electrons
have enough energy to leave the traps and de-excite without the need of heat. That
affects the sensitivity of the dosimeter. It is possible to transfer the TL sensitivity of
low temperatures to the dosimetry peak by pre-heating just before the read-out. Thus
the background signal is removed and therefore, the dosimetry peak is much more
distinct (figure 2.4.1-curve B).

After the TLDs are read-out, they are annealed in order to ensure the signal
has been completely removed and the TLD is again ready for use. For the TLD100
the annealing is not as simple, as it is first heated at 400
0
C for an hour and then at
80
0
C for 16 to 24 hours. If the used annealing temperature is more than 400
0
C the
sensitivity of the material is reduced [4].

The area under the glow curve, after the appropriate calibration, corresponds
to the absorbed dose which is measured using the TLD reader. If the rate of the
9
temperature is constant the glow curve is the TL intensity against the time. A good
reproducibility of the heating cycles is very important for accurate measurements [2].
A typical read-out cycle, which includes the pre-heating, heating, annealing and
cooling periods, is shown in figure 2.4.2.

Figure 2.4.2: A typical read-out cycle [1].

At higher temperatures (300-400
0
C) a spurious TL signal is produced called
triboluminescence. This signal is produced due to the combination of effects of the
absorbed gases and the dirt and humidity of the TL material. It can be reduced using
an oxygen-free gas, like nitrogen or argon, around the TL material during the read-out
cycle. This problem should be taken into account especially for low dose rate
measurements [1].

The dose response curve of the TLD100 is shown in figure 2.4.3. The TL
intensity is linear for low doses (3 to 10 Gy). For dose equal to zero the TL signal is
not zero, but it is equal to a background signal which determines the threshold of the
absorbed dose, that can be measured by a dosimeter. For higher doses, the response is
10
supralinear. The signal is increased reaching a maximum called saturation and then
decreases quickly [4].

Figure 2.4.3: TL signal against absorbed dose [4].

The saturation is related to fill traps or to the beginning of radiation damage
[9]. 20% less than the saturation dose is, in practice, the maximum limit. Over this
dose more calibration factors are needed and therefore the error of the measurement is
increased [4]. Supralinearity and saturation can lead to problems of under and over
estimation respectively. They can both be affected prior to radiation exposures.
Therefore, re-use of these dosimeters have different dose response. In order to avoid
annealing, heating procedures are required [9].

Only a small part of the incident ionizing radiation is absorbed as dose and
measured in a TLD material when is heated. Thus, the ratio of the TL light which is
emitted per unit mass over the absorbed dose is called intrinsic efficiency of the TLD.
The intrinsic efficiency of the TLD100 is found to be equal to 0.039% with the rest of
the dose, approximately 99.6%, is converted to thermal radiation. That is the main
reason why the reproducibility conditions are very important for the read-out of a
TLD as only a small part of the total energy deposited is actually measured to
determine the whole dose [1].
11
2.5. Advantages and Disadvantages of TLD100

The most important advantages and disadvantages of the TLD100 are shown
in Table 2.5.1 below [1-2].

Table 2.5.1: Advantages and Disadvantages of TLD100 .
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Large availability of TLDs and readers from
many manufactures
The signal is read only once- The signal is erased
during the read-out cycle
They are available in many forms It is easy to lose the reading
They are tissue equivalent Loss of TL signal due to fading
They have small size and therefore they can be
used for point dose measurements
TLDs have different sensitivities- Calibration is
essential for accurate measurements
They have large range of dose TLDs are sensitive to light
Their response is not depended on the dose rate
The storage in a TLD is not stable Annealing
heating cycle is needed
By using annealing procedures they can be
reused many times before they are completely
damaged from radiation
Spurious TL signals are produced due to scraping of
a TLD or its contamination by dirt or humidity
Due to their reusability their cost is decreased
The sensitivity is decreased or increased after a
large dose received by a TLD- an additional anneal
procedure is then needed
The read-out is quick and it does not require any
wet chemicals
It is not recommended for beam calibration
Automatic readers which are connected to PCs
are available

1-2% reproducibility can be achieved using
calibration

In a single exposure many TLDs can be exposed
Due to
6
Li they are sensitive to neutrons
TLD600 and TLD700 have different
sensitivities to neutrons

12
2.6. Calibration

2.6.1. Batch Calibration - Element Correction Coefficient

Even though dosimeters are irradiated to the same uniform dose at the same
geometrical conditions, their sensitivity (efficiency) is different. The TL efficiency
can be expressed as the TL light which is emitted per unit of absorbed dose. The
variance in the sensitivity of a typical batch of TL dosimeters is unavoidable but can
be reduced from 10-15% to 1-2% when dosimeters are calibrated. Thus, calibration is
critical.

The Element Correction Coefficient (ECC) is a correction factor which relates
the TL efficiency of a specific dosimeter to the average TL efficiency (TLE) of the
Calibration dosimeters and is given by:

j
j
TLE
ECC
TLE
< >
= (2)
Where
ECC
j
= the ECC of a dosimeter j
<TLE>= the mean TLE of the Calibration dosimeters
And TLE
j
= the TLE of the dosimeter j from the Field dosimeters
In order to calculate the average TLE a small subset of all the dosimeters is used,
called Calibration dosimeters (CD). The average value of all the CDs is compared
with the efficiency of each one of all the dosimeters, called Field dosimeters (FD), to
calculate the ECC for each one individually.
But the TLE is proportional to the TL response (TLR) of the dosimeter
TLR K TLE = (3)
where
K= proportionality constant
and TLR= the quantity which is measured and produced when ionizing radiation is
incident on the dosimeter
Therefore, by reducing the variance of the efficiency (or sensitivity), the variation of
the response is also reduced. This correction factor is then multiplied with the
13
response of each dosimeter and its efficiency becomes identical to the mean of all the
dosimeters. As a result, all the TLDs have similar efficiencies (see figure 2.6.1.1).

Figure 2.6.1.1: ECC factors.

The actual quantity measured by the Reader is the charge which is produced
during the TL process. Consequently, the ECC can be expressed by:

j
j
Q
ECC
Q
< >
= (4)
Where
<Q>= the average measured charge of the Calibration dosimeters
and Q
j
= the charge measured from dosimeter j
By reducing the variance in efficiency the variation of the measured charge is also
decreased.

If new dosimeters are added, the ECCs are re-evaluated with the aim of having
similar efficiency with the existing ones. In order to achieve this, the sensitivity of the
Calibration dosimeters must remain constant [8].


14
2.6.2. Reader Calibration Factor

If a constant geometry, constant operational conditions and similar response of
the TLDs are achieved, the only part of the whole system that is not stable for long
time is the Reader. Thus a Reader Calibration factor (RCF) should be applied which is
given by:

Q
RCF
L
< >
= (5)
where
<Q>= the mean charge measured of a set of Calibration dosimeters
and L= a radiation quantity expressed in generic units (gU). 1 gU is the radiation
delivered in 1 second at a specific geometry by a specific source at a constant distance
from the source.

The set of Calibration dosimeters used for the calculation of <Q> are
automatically selected by the software. These are the dosimeters which have the
lowest difference from the average value of the charge measured for the generation of
the ECCs. These dosimeters are equal to 1-2% of the total number of dosimeters used
for calibration.

It is very important to find a relation between a gU and Gray (for absorbed
dose) or Sievert (for equivalent dose). The dose measured from a dosimeter j is given
by:

j
j
q ECC
D
j
RCF K

(6)
where
q
j
= the charge measured by the Reader from a Field Dosimeter j
ECC
j
and RCF are as defined above
and K is expressed by:

L
K
D
= (7)
where
L and D are as defined above.
K is measured in gU/Gy
15
From equation (6) the quantity RCF*K is measured in nC/gU and shows a
relation between the dose and the internal units of the Reader. The time between
irradiation and read-out or irradiation and preparation is not important but it should
remain constant. Using the RCF an accurate conversion from charge to dosimetric
units is achieved [8].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

The materials and equipment used are listed below:
- Harshaw Bicron TLD Reader (Model 6600E)
More details and specification of the reader are presented in Appendix 1.
- TL dosimeters (TLD100)
In total 124 TLD100 cards were used. TLD cards are tacked on pieces of
polystyrene (felizol), using pins, during the irradiations. More details and
characteristics of the TLD100 can be found in theory section 2.3-2.4.
-
137
Cs source
The source is used for the Readers and TLDs calibration and for the study of
the energy response of these dosimeters at high energies (662 keV). For the
specifications of the source see Appendix I.
- Mammography unit (Planmed Sophie Classic)
For the exposure of the TLDs at low energies and the examination of the TL
response at these energies (28 33 keV) a mammography unit is used. For the
specification of this unit see Appendix I.
- Radiography unit (Mecall EIDOS)
For the irradiation of the TLDs at energies between 47 and 120 keV a
diagnostic radiography unit is used. For the specification of this unit see
Appendix I.

To ensure that the dose remains constant, different ion chambers are used for the
measurement of dose at the different irradiation units.
16
- IONEX 2500/3 ion chamber (for the
137
Cs source)
- Radcal Model 10X9-6O (for the radiography unit)
- Radcal Model 10X9-6M (for the mammograpgy unit).
Specifications of these ion chambers are given in Appendix I.
3.2. Methodology

The TLD readers calibration as well as the TLDs and batch calibration are
carried out following the steps given in the TLD readers manual [8]. The
methodology sequence is described below.

3.2.1. Selection of Time Temperature Profile (TTP)

The TTP corresponding to the TLD100 material, shown in Table 3.2.1.1 is set
on the Reader [8].

Table 3.2.1.1: Time Temperature Profile for TLD100.
PREHEAT
Temp (C)
Time (sec)

50
0
ACQUISITION
Max Temp (C)
Time (sec)
Rate (C/sec)

300
13.33
25
ANNEAL
Temp (C)
Time (sec)

0
0



17
3.2.2. Selection of Calibration Dosimeters (CDs)

For the selection of the CDs, the TLDs are annealed in the reader so that any
residual exposure is removed and are then stored in a subdued UV environment at
temperature less than 30 C.

The TLDs are exposed in a Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory at a
dose of 500 mR (= 4380 Gy) using a
137
Cs source (figure 3.2.2.1). The TLDs are
then stored for 30 minutes at a maximum temperature of 30 C, to allow for the
shallow TL peak (peak 1 in figure 2.4.1) to fade out. The time between irradiation and
read-out must remain constant to have for all dosimeters the same fading.

The TLDs are subsequently placed in the reader and read.

The Reader automatically designates the TLD cards as CDs those that fall
within a specified range around the normalized mean value of their response. Usually
this range is narrower than 0.9 to 1.1 (10 %).

Figure 3.2.2.1: Irradiation of TLDs.
3.2.3. Calculation of Reader Calibration Factor (RCF)

For the creation of the Reader Calibration Factor the selected CDs are
annealed, exposed and read repeating the cycle described in 3.2.1. The RCF is
calculated automatically by the reader.
18
3.2.4. Calculation of the Element Correction Coefficients
(ECCs) and Selection of Field Dosimeters (FDs)

The ECCs are generated by repeating for the third time the annealing,
exposure and reading cycle for the rest of the dosimeters (not the CDs). ECCs are
calculated automatically by the Reader (one for each TLD element). The mean value
and the standard deviation for each ECC are calculated.

The Reader automatically designates the TLD cards as FDs falling within a
specified range around the normalized mean value of their response. A typical batch
of FDs has a variation less than one relative standard deviation.

3.2.5. Irradiation procedure

The TLDs are positioned 2 meters from the irradiation source with the aid of a
laser beam. The TLD cards are pinned on a piece of polystyrene support with
dimensions 20 x 20 cm
2
(20 TLDs for each irradiation - see figure 3.2.5.1). The

Figure 3.1.5.1: 20 cards were placed on a block of polystyrene (The maximum distance of a TLD
element from the centre of the irradiation beam is 12.5 cm).

maximum distance of a TLD element from the centre of the irradiation beam is 12.5
cm. The distance between this TLD and the irradiation source is 2.0039 meters (figure
3.2.5.2) which is well within the positioning error for such a calibration set-up. It was
19
assumed that all TLDs are exposed to the same dose independently of their position at
the edge or in the middle of the polystyrene piece.

Figure 3.2.5.2: Diagram showing the positioning error for the TLD cards irradiation with the
137Cs source.
3.2.6. Repeatability

The repeatability of the TLDs is examined be exposing each time 20 FDs
using the
137
Cs source. The FDs are stored for 30 minutes for fading and then are read.

This procedure is repeated 10 times. The mean value of each exposure, the
standard deviation and the standard error of the mean are calculated. The TL response
of the TLDs (relative to the first exposure) is represented in a graphical form as a
function of the number of exposures.

3.2.7. Energy dependence

By keeping the dose constant (4.38 mGy or 4.38 mSv equivalent dose) the
energy dependence is investigated within the energy range for which the TLDs will be
used routinely.

Due to physical limitation the irradiation distance for the mammography unit
is 0.6 m and for the radiography unit 1.0 m.

The TLD irradiations are repeated 4 times for 20 dosimeters per irradiation
using the
137
Cs source and 20 times for 4 dosimeters (see figure 3.2.7.1) using the
mammography unit (positioning error=0.6017 m) and radiography unit (positioning
20
error=1.0010 m), so as to minimize the irradiation distance error from the centre to the
edge in the case of the mammography and the radiography units set-up.

Figure 3.2.7.1: 4 cards were placed on a block of polystyrene (The maximum distance is 4.5 cm).

The mean responses and their uncertainties are calculated. The energy
response of the TLDs is represented in graphical form as the relative response (TL
response/ response of the
137
Cs) as a function of irradiation beam energy. For low
energy photons (mammography unit) the TL response is measured and compared at
two different energy qualities (Rh and Mo anode filtration).

3.2.8. Angular dependence

The angular dependence of the TLD cards is investigated at the same dose and
energy. The TLDs are positioned as for the energy dependence but at an angle to the
direction of the irradiation beam (as an example see figure 3.2.8.1). 5 groups of 4
TLDs, were irradiated by keeping the positions of the TLDs exactly the same for all
the measurements. The measurement was repeated 4 times for each group for each
angle.

The mean responses and their errors are calculated. The angular relative
response (TL response at an angle/TL response at 0) against the angle is given in
graphical form.
21

Figure 3.2.8.1: Irradiation at an angle equal to 10.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Selection of Calibration Dosimeters (CDs)

The reader automatically selects the TLD cards that are within the set selection
limits. Initially the selection limit was set to 0.9-1.1. As all TLDs felt within this limit,
the limit was reduced and the CDs were selected as those within the range of 0.94-
1.06 ( 6%).

The readings for the 124 TLD cards are given in Appendix II. 42 TLDs are
within the selection limits and are designated automatically by the reader as the CDs.

The TLDs that are indicated in Appendix II as bad will be used to select the
FDs that will be used for the repeatability, energy and angular response
measurements.

4.2. Calculation of Reader Calibration Factor (RCF)

The RCF was calculated automatically from the reader and was found equal to
0.034127 and 0.027526 (no units). Two different RCFs were calculated as each card
22
consists of 2 TL elements. Thus the first RCF is for the TLD in position ii and the
second one for position iii. According to [10] the RCF of this reader changes by 1.3%
over 5.5 years proving that its system is reliable and stable. Using the RCF, a
measurement of the charge is automatically converted into dose by the reader (see
equation 6).

4.3. Calculation of Element Correction Coefficients (ECCs)
and Selection of Field Dosimeters (FDs)

For selecting the FDs to be used for the energy and angular dependence of the
TL response a range of 0.7-1.3 ( 30%) of the normalized mean value of the response
was chosen. For the TLD element falling in this range their ECCs were calculated (a
different one for each TLD element). Those falling outside this range were rejected.
These ECCs are used by the Reader to multiply automatically each charge
measurement in order to have a similar sensitivity (efficiency).

According to [10], ECCs follow a Gaussian distribution with mean value equal
to 1. The values of the ECCs of the selected FDs are shown in graph 4.3.1. As ECCs
are correction factors given by the Reader, it was assumed that they do not have an
error.
0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
N
u
m
b
e
r

o
f

d
o
s
i
m
e
t
e
r
s
ECC values

Figure 4.3.1: The normal distribution of ECCs.
23
A Gaussian curve is fitted to the ECC distribution (red curve in figure 4.3.1).
This is obtained by using equation
( )
2
2
2
0
c
x x
w
y y A e

= +
given by the Origin
Pro 8 program, where y0=0.620.14, A=30.821.30, xc=1.0010.01 and
w=0.060.01. The measured mean value of the normal distribution (xc) is equal to
1.0010.01 (no units) and is similar to the theoretical mean value. The standard
deviation of that distribution is equal to 0.060.01 (w).

The 57 FDs that are within this range of standard deviation are chosen to be
used for the repeatability, energy and angular dependence response measurements.

4.4. Repeatability

The repeatability of the FDs was checked by irradiating them with the same
dose and energy. The energy was 662keV, as a
137
Cs source was used, and the dose
was equal to 4380 Gy. As badges were not used, there was no filter to separate the
elements for skin or deep dose. The mean value of all the FD responses for each
exposure was calculated with its uncertainty (standard error of the mean). As the
Reader converts the charge measurement into dose using correction factors is was
assumed that the error due to the Reader is very small compared to the error of the
mean value and only this uncertainty is taken into account. As a more accurate value,
the uncertainty of the measured dose assumes to be one standard deviation at 95%
coincidence level instead of the standard error of the mean.

According to [11] the repeatability of the TLD 100 should be within 2%. The
measured dose per cycle, relative to the dose measured in the first cycle, as a function
of the number of exposures [12], is illustrated in figure 4.4.1, showing that the
reproducibility is within the threshold (2%) of all the exposures. The actual
reproducibility observed in this work is about 1 %. The error bars shown in figure
4.4.1 are calculated by adding the errors in quadrature i.e.:
( )
2
2
1
2
1
1
j j
SD D SD
R
D
D
o
| |
| |
|
= +
|
|
\ .
\ .

24
where
SD
1
and SD
j
are the standard deviation of the 1
st
and j exposure accordingly (j=1-10)
and
1
D and
j
D are the mean measured dose (response) of the first and j exposure
respectively.
0 2 4 6 8 10
0.97
0.98
0.99
1.00
1.01
1.02
1.03
Measured dose relative to the measured dose in the first exposure
Upper limit (+2%)
Lower limit (-2%)
R
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
Number of exposure

Figure 4.4.1: The reproducibility against the number of exposures.

According to [13] the ISO requirement is that the Coefficient of Variation
(CV) should not exceed 10%. The CV of each exposure is shown in Table 4.4.1 and
as indicated the CV is less than 10% for all exposures and is calculated by [14]
(%) 100%
SD
CV
Mean
=

Table 4.4.1: CV for 10 different exposures.
Number of
exposures
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Coefficient of
Variation (%)
1.4 1.5 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.7

25
4.5. Energy dependence

FDs were irradiated to 4.38 mSv using photons of energies 28 and 33 keV
(mammography unit), 47, 60, 80, 100 and 120 keV (radiography unit) and 662 keV
(
137
Cs source). As the TL signal is proportional to the dose absorbed by the TLD, the
energy response was defined as the TL response relative to the
137
Cs response, at the
same irradiation conditions. Whereas the calibration was carried out using the
137
Cs
source, the accuracy of the measured doses in diagnostic x-ray energies is not affected
[15].

For the measurements of the energy dependence no phantom was used.
According to [16] the relative response of TLDs is similar whether the irradiation is
on phantom or in air.

The energy response relative to the
137
Cs source response is portrayed in figure
4.5.1. The mean response, standard deviation and standard error in the mean for all
the measured energies were calculated. The maximum error for the TL response at
energy j was found using:
2 2
max max j j
SD SD o = +

where
SD
j
is the standard deviation at 95% coincidence level for an energy j
and SD
max
is the maximum standard deviation at 95% coincidence level found from
the repeatability in part 4.4.
The uncertainty of the relative response, indicated by the size of the error bars in
figure 4.5.1, was calculated by adding the errors in quadrature i.e.:
( )
2
2
max max
. 2
j j Cs
E R
Cs
Cs
D
D
D
o o
o
| |
| |
|
= +
|
|
\ .
\ .

where

max j
and
max cs
are the maximum error of the jth energy response and
137
Cs response

respectively
and
Cs
D and
j
D are the mean measured signal of the
137
Cs and j energies.
26

Figure 4.5.1: Energy response (relative to 137Cs response) versus the energy.

Figure 4.5.1 demonstrates the influence of the x-ray beam energy quality by
the points on the graph obtained with the mammography unit by generating x-rays
with the same nominal energy but with different beam filtration, thus producing a
different energy spectrum. In such cases the energy response of the TL material is that
of a specific energy spectrum characteristic of the x-ray beam anode and beam
filtration material used. Molybdenum (Mo) and Rhodium (Rh) filtrations give
different TL energy response due to the different spectra produced by the x-ray tube.
These spectra are illustrated in figure 4.5.2 and 4.5.3 using the XCompW program
[17].

Figure 4.5.2: Mo and Rh filtration at 28 keV.
27
For the radiography unit the same filter (1.7 mm Aluminum-Al) was used. The
respective energy spectra for the radiographic unit are shown in figure 4.5.4. It can be
concluded, therefore, that the energy dependence of the TL materials as used in
Diagnostic Radiology is a function of the energy spectrum (energy quality) and not a
function of the nominal value of the energy used to produce the energy spectrum.


Figure 4.1.3: Mo and Rh filtration at 33 keV.

Figure 4.5.4: Different spectra of incident beams used for Radiography unit.
28
Compared with the energy response curve given from Harshaw TLD-100 [18],
the shape found is similar, although in [18] only one filter is used for low energies.

According to [13] the ISO requirement is that the response should be within
the range of 0.5-1.5 assuming monoenergetic beams. Even so, in this work, for the
energy range of 47-662 keV the TL response is within this range. Using the Mo filter
in mammography unit this requirement is satisfied. With the Rh filter the response at
33 keV is about 1.6 and thus the ISO requirement is not met at that energy.

4.6. Angular dependence

The angular dependence of the TLDs was studied at an incident energy equal
to 120 keV with the radiographic unit where the energy response is constant (figure
4.5.1). The piece of polystyrene was rotated around the central axis of the incident
beam at 10, 30, 50, 70 and 90 degrees in both directions. The clockwise rotation
assumed to be the positive values of the angles and the anticlockwise the negative
ones.

The mean value, standard deviation and standard error in the mean were
calculated for each angle for all the groups of the irradiated TLDs. The TL response
normalized to 0 (TL response at an angle/TL response at 0) as a function of the
angle is shown in figure 4.6.1 using polar coordinates.

Figure 4.6.1: TL response normalized to 0 against the angle.
29
The uncertainty of the angle is estimated to be 1. The maximum error of the
response at each angle is the same as explained in part 4.5 for energy dependence. The
uncertainty for the response normalized to 0 was calculated adding the errors at the
same way as explained in part 4.4 and 4.5.

Figure 4.6.1 shows that the TL response is roughly constant for both positive
and negative angles for up to about 70. The TL response is reduced to about half its
value when the angles become 90 in both directions. This means that when a worker
stands at 90 with respect to the incident beam, the TLDs measure half of the dose
compared to the dose which would be measured at 0.

It is worth pointing out that the small difference in the angular response
noticed in figure 4.6.1 for the angular range of -30 to -65 compared with those of 30
to 65 is due to the decrease in the irradiation distance as the TLDs are closer in the x-
ray tube (see figure 4.6.2). As the dose is proportional to the inverse square of the
distance (1/d
2
), for smaller distance the measured dose is relatively higher [19]. For
longer distances the measured dose is relatively lower as illustrated in figure 4.6.2.

Figure 4.6.2: The difference in distance in which the incident beam travels for 45 .

As reported by [20] the angular response of LiF:Mg,Cu,Na,Si (instead of
LiF:Mg,Ti) is reduced rapidly over 50-60. The main difference is that in [20] badges
were used in order to measure the deep dose. The badges have filters inside them
which affect the TL response of the TLDs. As reported by [21] where no filter was
used and the angular response of TLD 700 was measured, the results are almost stable
and reduced when TLDs are rotated to 90 (vertical).
30
According to [13] the ISO requirement states that the response over all angles
should not be more than 15%. At 90 this requirement is not met as the response is
reduced to about half of its initial value.

The raw data obtained for all the measurements made in this project are given
in Appendix II in Table form.

5. Conclusion

Personal dosimeters (Thermoluminescence dosimeters-TLDs) are worn by
workers every time they are exposed to radiation that is higher than 3/10 of the dose
equivalent limits, to make sure that a reference limit is not exceeded. When TLDs are
heated, they emit light and by measuring it with a PMT inside a reader, the dose is
measured in mGy or in mSv for the whole body.

In this project, the TLD-100, fabricated from LiF and doped with Mg and Ti,
is examined. The reader and batch calibration are carried out first using a
137
Cs
source. Then the repeatability of the TLDs is checked by repeating the same
procedure 10 times using a
137
Cs source. Their energy and angular response are also
studied at different energies and angles respectively, but at a constant dose of the
incident beam, with the aid of a
137
Cs source, a radiography and a mammography unit.

CDs are first selected as they fall within the range of 0.94-1.06. Using CDs the
RCF is calculated automatically by the reader and is found equal to 0.034127 and
0.027526. FDs are then selected falling within the range of 0.7-1.3 ( 30%) and are
used for the rest of the measurements. ECCs are also calculated automatically by the
reader, one for each TLD element, which follow a Gaussian distribution with a
theoretical mean value equal to 1. The measured Gaussian distribution is shown in
figure 4.3.1 and has a mean value of 1.0010.01.

After the calibration the charge measurements are converted into dose with a
similar sensitivity for all the TLDs. Their repeatability is found about 1% which is
31
within the limit (2%) for all the exposures. The maximum CV is measured 1.7%,
much lower than the maximum allowed one (10%).

The energy response is then measured and the curve which is found has
similar shape with the curve of Harshaw TLD-100 (manufacturer). At low energies
two different filters are used (Mo and Rh) producing two different spectra. The
measured responses of the TLDs at these energies with the different filters are not the
same, showing that the energy dependence of the TL materials, as used in Diagnostic
Radiology, is a function of the energy spectrum (energy quality) and not a function of
the nominal value of the energy used to produce the energy spectrum.

The angular dependence is studied using photons of maximum energy equal to
120 keV. The angular response was almost constant for all the angles up to about 70
for both directions and it is reduced to about half its value when the angle becomes
90. Small difference in the angular response (figure 4.6.1) for the angular range of -
30 to -65 compared with those of 30 to 65 is due to the change in the irradiation
distance as the TLDs are closer and further away from the x-ray tube. The ISO
requirement is met at all angles except at 90 for both directions.

Different results, especially for the angular response, were expected to appear
if badges with filters were used, as different spectra would be produced in order to
measure the deep and skin dose. In future work, badges can be used to check if the
response would be reduced for lower angles and not only for 90. Also,
monoenergetic beams could be used as the ISO requirements are referred to them.
Spectra produced by the x-ray tube are continuous energy distribution with the
maximum energy the one used to plot the graphs. Different filters absorb different low
energy photons and thus different spectra are produced, giving dissimilar response. In
such situation a better energy value could be the effective spectrum energy and not the
maximum energy value as used in this project.

Finally, in future work, the TLD elements could be removed from the TLD
cards. As the TLD cards are made of aluminum, the incident beam is absorbed by it
and the response of the elements is affected, especially for higher angles where the
beam hits first on the metal and is partially absorbed before it reaches the TLD.
32
Appendix I Equipment Specifications

Harshaw Bicron Model 6600E Automatic TLD Workstation

The Harshaw Automatic TLD Workstation (Model 6600E) is the reader used
for this project and is used for whole body and extremity TLD measurements. This
projects main interest is for the whole body dose measurements. A non contact
heating system is used which utilizes a stream of hot nitrogen gas. Glow curves and
data calculated, using algorithm software, are shown on an electroluminescence panel
of the Reader. The Reader can be connected to a computer where all measured data
can also be displayed and stored. The PC is connected with a printer for printing the
results [8].

Up to 200 TLD cards can be placed in the reader. Each card consists of four
chips as shown in figure 1. In this project only the two chips for each card are used,
which are made of TLD100. The holders (where the cards are placed in) are made of
two different filters thicknesses, 0.07mm (for skin dose measurements) and 0.1mm
(for deep dose measurements). One corner of the TLD card is notched to make sure it
is placed correctly in the Reader (see figure 1). The holder protects the cards from the
environment and keeps the filtration media which attenuate different types of
radiation in order to ensure selective entrapments of the TLD100. Apart from the
chips, each card has an ID number in barcode and numeric layout [8].

Figure 1: Dosimeter card [8]
33
The Reader holds two cartridges, where the first one is empty and the second
with the TLD cards to be read. When a card is read, is moved to the empty cartridge.
If its barcode can not be read, is moved to a Rejected Card Drawer in order to be
removed at the end of the whole read-out cycle.

Element Correction Coefficients are generated during the calibration and
saved in the reader together with the Reader Calibration Factors. Both are used during
the read-out cycle and the reader provides directly a dose measurement in Sv instead
of charge. A different RCF can be saved for up to ten sets of Time Temperature
Profile (TTP). In a TTP the operator can change the time and temperatures for the
heating cycle (pre-heat, heat and anneal temperatures). During the measurements of
the TLDs, the reader also measures the reference light and the PMT noise, which are
the light produced from the background and the PMT respectively.

A Quality Assurance profile is also displayed to monitor the accuracy of the
operating parameters of the Reader. The option of the electronics Quality Control, in
this menu, monitors a series of electronic measurements from the Card Reader to
identify if the reader is properly adjusted [8].

Instrument specifications [8]

Dynamic Range: 7 decades
TTP reproducibility: 1 C
Light Stability: Less than 0.5% variation
Linearity: Less than 1% deviation
High Voltage: 0.005%
Dark Current (background
noise):
Less than 1Gy
137
Cs equivalent dark current
Warm-up time: Less than 5 minutes
Tissue Equivalent: Nearly tissue equivalent
Throughput: 4 chip dosimeters 60 per hour
2 chip dosimeters 100 per hour
34
TTP Capabilities: Preheat temperature 20 to 200 C
Preheat time 0 to 300 seconds
Acquisition time 10 to 300 seconds
Temperature rate 1 to 50 C/sec
Acquisition temperature to 300 C
Post-read anneal temperature to 300 C

Specification of mammography unit (PLANMED SOPHIE
classic) [22]

Generator Potential 80 kKz (constant)
20-35 kV output
10-500 mAs
120 mA large focus
42 mA fine focus
Computer controlled
X ray tube Rotating anode
300,000 HU Mo target
0.1/0.3 mm foci
Biangular anode
High speed
Be window(1.0 mm)
Mo filter (+ Rh optional filter)
35-11 mA focus
Air and oil cooled
Bult-in spot collimator
C Arm Isocentric movement within -135 to
180 degrees
SID 65 cm
Dual Control panels
Digital display of projection angle
35
Bucky Manual cassette loading and
unloading
18 x 24 and 24 x 30 cm cassettes
5:1 grid ratio
Exposure Control Modes Advanced AEC with Auto-kV
Density control in 15 steps
Compression Efficient patient compression
Easy lock-in facility
Two foot controls plus hand controls
Base Free standing base

Specifications of Medcal EIDOS (radiography unit) [23-24]

DR system Advanced system with grid equipped
and auto-focusing device
Detector Technology a-Si
Resolution 143 m
Detector size 43 x 43 cm
Height 270 cm from the floor
Filtration 1.7 mm Al
Active Area of the detector 43 x 43 (3000 x 3000 pixels 14 bit)
Image Immediately image availability
No film or cassettes
Carbon-fiber tabletop For 90 rotation
Motorized movements Full automated control
Mode Manual
36
Other features High efficiency
DICOM 3 interface
Anatomical programming
Anatomical Tissue Harmonization
DICOM Modality Performance
Procedures Step
Image Stitching


Specifications of
137
Cs source [25]

The
137
Cs irradiation unit used is of the Irradiation type DCI-01-I Institute of
Hungarian Academy of Science. Installed in 1992, with the source activity 1900 GBq
on 01/07/1990. The TL dosimeters were irradiated on the 23/05/2001 in horizontal
beam geometry.

Decay chain of the
137
Cs source [26]

37
Specifications of ion chamber IONEX 2511/3 [27]

Volume 600 cc
Dimensions Height 112 mm (4.4)
Dia. 130 mm (5.1)
Charge sensitivity
Coulomb/Rontgen
1.8 x 10
-7
Weight 850 g (1 Ib 14 oz)
Cable Length 1 m (39.6)
Useful Energy range 40 to 3000 kV
Measuring ranges Provided
Exposure in R
0-1 mR
0-10 mR
0-100 mR
0-1 R
Maximum leakage rate 10 R/min
Maximum exposure rate for greater
than 99% saturation
0.2 R/ min continuous
Energy response Calibration Certificates supplied with
each Ionization chamber specifies the
measured correction factors at
various x and - rays energies.
Connector Precision Electronic Terminations
Limited, Tri-axial, Double screened,
Plug Free Type 201-DS-T3329-
P.T.F.E.

Specifications for Radcall ion chambers [28]

For the low energies (mammography unit) a 6cc Radcall ion chamber was
used (Model 100X9-6M) and for higher energies (50-110 kV radiography unit) a
38
60cc Radcall chamber was used (Model 10X9-6O). Both ion chambers have
calibration factors 1.04 at 98.3 kPa and 25.6 C. Their specifications are identical.

Operating temperature 15 to 35 C
Storage Temperature -20 to 50 C
Humidity Up to 80%
Pressure 60 to 105 kPa
Accuracy 4 % of reading, 1 digit
Repeatability 1 % of reading, 1 digit
40-160 kV Accuracy
40-160 kV Repeatability
22-40 kV Accuracy
22-40 kV Repeatability
Width ( 2ms 5s)
1kV or 1%
0.2 kV
0.5 kV
0.1 kV
0.1 % 0.2 ms measured at 75% of
peak kV
Sensitivity 20 mV/kV
0.5 mV/mA
Output 100
Sample Rate 77 s
3 db frequency 2.3 Hz










39
Appendix II Row Data
Raw Data for the Selection of CDs and FDs and their
calibration factors





40








41







42







43



Due to the large number of measurements only a small sample of data is given
below. The rest of the data records can be found at the Department of Medical Physics
in the Nicosias General Hospital.


44
Data for the Repeatability
Position ii
(Sv)
Position iii
(Sv)
Position ii
(Sv)
Position iii
(Sv)
Position ii
(Sv)
Position iii
(Sv)
4396.3 4461.2 4493.6 4576.2 4442.1 4469.9
Exposure 1
4430.1 4514.5
Exposure 4
4437.8 4474.5
Exposure 8
4455.5 4629.7
4471.9 4510.7 4417.8 4557.1 4479.3 4505.8
4459.0 4499.0 4502.2 4530.3 4432.0 4456.9
4346.8 4405.5 4409.1 4397.9 4415.9 4433.9
4417.4 4487.3 4339.7 4455.9 4536.6 4585.7
4370.4 4467.9 4373.1 4390.6 4438.0 4460.1
4400.7 4452.7 4419.2 4482.2 4528.0 4551.7
4456.6 4471.3 4487.7 4552.7 4424.0 4415.9
4398.4 4421.5 4409.2 4473.8 4517.4 4482.1
4454.2 4477.0 4437.8 4475.3 4458.9 4458.6
4277.8 4307.2 4358.5 4439.2 4455.0 4434.3
4390.2 4434.5 4473.8 4410.9 4475.0 4389.6
4344.4 4489.7 4426.3 4374.9 4484.2 4393.3
4361.2 4399.2 4424.7 4460.9 4440.7 4428.6
4297.6 4401.4 4402.3 4398.2 4399.6 4347.2
4390.6 4460.4 4469.3 4459.3 4499.2 4471.8
4472.2 4493.0 4422.8 4367.5 4423.9 4375.0
4491.8 4491.2 4360.4 4474.3 4429.8 4453.3
4385.4 4409.4 4430.6 4466.4 4442.6 4428.6







45
Data for the Energy Response
28 keV (Mo) 33 keV (Mo)
Position ii
(Sv)
Position iii
(Sv)
Position ii
(Sv)
Position iii
(Sv)
6513.6 6706.0 6222.4 6719.0
6486.0 6669.2 6843.0 6948.8
5848.5 6312.9 6034.6 6525.7
5747.9 6314.9 6845.8 7015.1
5706.8 6279.2 6054.3 6573.4
6517.8 6597.7 6060.9 6505.4
6396.4 6663.9 6865.5 6946.8
5819.8 6253.3 6136.6 6602.4
6595.2 6770.6 6809.9 6997.8
5859.2 6295.9 6109.2 6479.5

28 keV (Rh) 33 keV (Rh)
6548.6 7140.5 6150.5 6552.8
7224.0 7411.5 6655.5 6687.2
6522.0 7008.3 5946.4 6309.0
7288.7 7495.7 6685.1 6832.0
6382.4 6930.4 6575.0 6656.6
6525.3 7096.3 6048.6 6520.0
6358.3 6921.0 6678.9 6767.8
7159.4 7341.6 5988.8 6338.8
7378.7 7505.2 6639.0 6622.0
6486.4 7031.8 6574.5 6671.7

47 keV 60 keV
5770.0 6367.3 5270.1 5806.7
6697.6 7132.4 6107.1 6513.4
6832.2 7186.6 5948.7 6427.9
46
5635.1 6277.2 5121.2 5803.5
5684.0 6212.5 5211.5 5759.9
6731.1 7060.9 5120.5 5681.9
5897.2 6321.2 5778.7 6301.9
6606.6 6938.6 5191.5 5741.1
5514.2 5969.9 5976.0 6509.4
5714.8 6189.2 5993.1 6431.0

80 keV 100 keV
5536.1 5928.0 4259.2 4751.3
4711.0 5281.8 4867.7 5373.6
4678.8 5302.5 4857.3 5334.4
5644.6 6007.1 4264.8 4717.7
4822.6 5332.1 4772.3 5245.4
5551.0 5903.8 4180.9 4747.6
4738.0 5218.6 4854.7 5269.1
4577.6 5063.4 4092.1 4672.2
5392.5 5768.7 4248.8 4847.7
5450.4 5813.6 4979.6 5424.1

120 keV
3995.1 4406.0
4546.0 5011.6
4553.8 4960.6
3927.2 4370.3
4682.2 4974.8
4592.6 4898.8
3957.6 4371.0
3905.3 4326.1
3934.5 4398.7
4631.8 5045.9
47
Data for the Angular Dependence
-90 -70
Position ii
(Sv)
Position iii
(Sv)
Position ii
(Sv)
Position iii
(Sv)
2160.3 2572.2 3859.2 4439.6
1701.6 2025.9 3769.7 4296.0
1859.4 2281.9 4738.9 5078.7
2476.1 2419.8 4302.8 4788.0
1980.3 2498.4 3966.3 4451.5
3316.6 3454.3 3716.5 4175.4
2254.1 2449.8 4738.4 5006.0
2592.6 2415.4 4383.6 4705.2
1770.9 2037.6 4738.7 5094.0
2296.5 2427.2 4478.9 4825.4

-50 -30
4685.7 5055.2 3928.9 4477.8
4409.3 4920.6 4820.0 5063.5
3942.0 4453.7 4462.7 4998.5
4438.2 4785.4 3997.2 4463.7
4780.5 5132.5 4505.9 4836.3
4545.1 4890.5 4801.7 5159.4
3782.6 4271.1 4667.1 5041.2
4558.1 4925.6 4020.3 4484.2
4452.3 4808.9 4554.1 4916.2
4747.9 5133.6 4554.1 4916.2

-10 10
3838.8 4414.8 4101.7 4418.8
4545.4 4879.8 4650.6 4901.3
4415.0 4890.9 4607.0 4993.9
48
3839.8 4297.6 3930.0 4304.1
4575.2 4900.0 3899.2 4358.3
4625.8 4967.7 4691.3 4965.7
4604.9 4922.6 4703.5 4955.0
3861.8 4341.1 3902.9 4343.1
4518.8 4793.2 3837.8 4284.9
4445.1 4788.2 4572.0 4862.7

30 50
4070.4 4644.8 3764.8 4301.8
4602.3 4944.2 4109.6 4683.3
4635.6 5163.4 4570.6 4854.3
3859.8 4344.4 4682.5 5196.6
3966.6 4494.7 3826.4 4283.5
4676.6 5043.7 3972.0 4497.0
4833.0 5205.5 4655.7 4967.6
3879.4 4376.1 4850.5 5216.9
3932.1 4456.4 3970.4 4494.5
4464.9 4826.7 4436.7 4779.6

70 90
4112.7 4675.7 1784.1 1863.8
5411.5 4752.2 2979.9 3178.7
4743.8 5050.0 1905.9 1629.1
3921.4 4289.8 2781.6 3152.5
4058.7 4560.0 1506.9 1886.9
4634.9 4963.2 2483.0 2985.9
4924.5 5235.0 1505.7 2007.5
3970.2 4463.7 2838.1 3029.2
4363.3 4684.5 1520.3 1377.7
4717.1 5019.6 2301.2 2668.2
49
Acronyms and Abbreviations

ECC= Element Correction Coefficient

RCF= Reader Calibration Factor

CD= Calibration Dosimeter

FD= Field Dosimeter

TTP= Time Temperature Profile

CV= Coefficient of Variation

ISO= International Standard Organization


















50
References

[1] Attix, F, H, Introduction to Radiological Physics & Radiation Dosimetry,
Canada: John Wiley & Sons, 1986

[2] IAEA, Radiation Oncology Physics: A handbook for teachers and students,
Vienna: IAEA, 2005

[3] IAEA, Practical Radiation Technical Manual Individual monitoring,
Vienna: IAEA, 2004

[4] McKinlay, A, F, Thermoluminescence dosimetry-Medical Physics Handbooks
5, Bristol: Adam Hilger Ltd, 1981

[5] Dam, J, V, and Morenello, G, Methods for in vivo dosimetry in external
radiotherapy, 2
nd
ed. Brussels: ESTRO, 2006

[6] Knoll, G, F, Radiation Detection & Measurement, 3
rd
ed, United States of
America: John Wiley & Sons, 2000

[7] The Hospital Physicists' Association, Practical Aspects of TLD, Manchester: The
Association, 1984

[8] Saint-Gobain/Norton Industrial Ceramins Corporation, Automatic TLD
Workstation (Model 6600E) User's manual, Ohio: Harshaw Bicron, 1994

[9] McKeever, S,W,S, Thermoluminescence of solids, New York: Press
Syndicate,1988

[10] Alves J, G, et al, Energy and angular dependence of the personal dosimeter
in use at ITN-DPRSN, Radiation Measurements, 43, 641-645, 2008

51
[11] Rathbone B, A, Hanford External Dosimetry Technical Basis Manual PNL-
MA-842, US: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2007

[12] Freire L, et al, Comparison of LiF (TLD-100 and TLD-100H) detectors for
extremity monitoring, Radiation Measurements, 43, 646-651, 2008

[13] Moor D,M, et al, Performance of the Harshaw DXT-RAD (TLD-100)
dosemeter, Radiation Measurements, 43, 533-537, 2008

[14] Easton, V,J, and McColl J,H, Statistics Glossary v1-1 [0nline], STEPS , 1997
Available from: http://www.stats.gla.ac.uk/steps/glossary/presenting_data.html#
coeffvar

[15] Muhogora, W,E, et al, Energy response of LiF:Mg,Ti dosimeters to ISO 4037
and typical diagnostic x-ray beams in Tanzania, Journal of Radiological
Protection, 22, 175-184, 2002

[16] Carinou, E, et al, Energy dependence of TLD 100 and MCP-N detectors,
Radiation Measurements, 43, 599-602, 2008

[17] Robert Nowotny, XCompW v. 0.20.0, Centre of Biomedical Engineering and
Physics, Medical University of Wien, Austria, 2009

[18] BICRON Technologies Vertriebs, Materials and Assemblies for
Thermoluminescence Dosimetry, HARSHAW TLD
Slough: BICRON Technologies (n.d.)

[19] Nisbet A, Interaction of X-rays & Electrons with Tissue, Royal Surrey
Country Hospital/ University of Surrey, 2010

[20] Jung H, et al, A personal thermoluminescence dosimeter using
LiF:Mg,Cu,Na,Si detectors for photon fields, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 59,
87-93, 2003

52
53
[21] Luo, L,Z, et al, Evaluating two extremity dosemeters based on LiF:Mg,Ti or
LiF:Mg,Cu,P, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Vol 101, Nos. 1-4, 211-216, 2002

[22] Medical Imaging Technologies Pty Ltd, Mammography Planmed Sophie
Classic [online], West Gosford (n.d.)
Available from: http://www.medimage.com.au/page/mammography.html [Accessed
11 Aug 2010]

[23] RadBook, Mecall EIDOS 3000 Technology Resolution Size Amorphous
Silicon photodiodes [0nline], Germany (n.d.)
Available from:
http://www.radbook.eu/nc/systems/radiography.html?tx_m9produktliste_pi1[producer
=232 [Accessed 12 Aug 2010]

[24] PriMax International S.A, Health Care Medical [online], France: PriMax
International S.A, 2008
Available from: http://www.hcmed.net/primax-international-sa/ [Accessed 12 Aug
2010]

[25] Institute of Isotopes of the Hungary Academy of Science, Calibration
Irradiator Cat No 01-J Installation Instruction, Budapest: Institute of Isotopes of
the Hungary Academy of Science, (n.d.)

[26] Regan, P, Naturally Occuring Radioactive Materials (NORM) and Other
Enviromental Radiation: Detection and Measurement, Department of Physics,
University of Surrey, Guildford, 2010

[27] Nuclear Enterprises LTD, Ionex 2500/3, England: Nuclear Enterprises LTD,
1980

[28] Radcal Corporation, Model 9095 Measurement System- Quick-start Manual,
U.S.A: Radcal Corporation, 2005