Demand & Capacity Evaluation Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 1. Introduction midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Case Study:
Seismic Design Check of a Skewed Steel Bridge
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities Force Based Design : midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation F D D F D u
F E D y
Elastic Analysis
Inelastic Response
F P Design Load F P = F E / R R
1
R = Response Modification Factor R = D u / D y , represent the ductility capacity of the ERS
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities Displacement-Based Design: midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Displacement-Based Design: F D D F D u
D y
Elastic Analysis
Inelastic Response
F P Equal Displacement Assumption: Displacements resulted from inelastic response is approximately equal to displacement obtained from linear elastic response spectrum analysis. Design Load is simply F P.
What to be checked:
D D D u D D
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities Seismic Design midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Comparison of two Design Approaches: Force
AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specification Complete design for STR, SERV limit state first Elastic demand forces divided by Response Modification Factor R Ductile response is assumed to be adequate without verification Capacity protection assumed Displacement
AASHTO Guide Specification for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Complete design for STR, SERV limit state first Displacement demands checked against displacement capacity Ductile response is assured with limitations prescribed for each SDC Capacity protection assured Capacity Protection: Column Shear Capacity Pier Cap Foundation Joint Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 2. Code Provisions midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Code Provisions:
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation SDC D:
Step 1: Displacement Analysis Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation SDC D: Step 1: Displacement Analysis Engineer Considerations: Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation SDC D: Step 1: Displacement Analysis
Consideration 2:
The periods can be obtained from the Eigenvalue Analysis.
The user can perform the eigenvalue analysis in Midas civil and can obtain the periods in the Longitudinal and the transverse direction.
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation SDC D: Step 1: Displacement Analysis
Analysis Procedure
We will follow Elastic Dynamic Analysis
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
Code Considerations: Section 5.4.3 1. At least 90 % Mass Participation in Longitudinal and Transverse direction 2. Damping : 5% 3. EDA Mode results must be combined by CQC method Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
Factors Affecting Elastic Dynamic Analysis: 1. Design Spectra: Site Conditions, return period etc. 2. Behavior of Structure: Elastically Linear and Damped 3. Foundation Behavior: Linear Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
Factors Affecting Elastic Dynamic Analysis: 1. Design Spectra: Site Conditions, return period etc. Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
Factors Affecting Elastic Dynamic Analysis: 2. Behavior of Structure: Elastically Linear and Damped
> The structure is supposed to behaves linearly.
> The Design Spectra Changes with Damping. Damping can be different in different modes.
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
Factors Affecting Elastic Dynamic Analysis: 3. Foundation Behavior: Linear
Load vs. Displacement curve for Soil Springs Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
Step1: Generation of Response Spectra: AASHTO LRFD specifies detailed guidelines on the generation of the Response Spectra based on the notional Ground Motion maps given and site factors described in Article 3.4.2
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
Step1: Generation of Response Spectra:
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
Step1: Generation of Response Spectra:
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
Step1: Generation of Response Spectra: Midas Civil
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
Step 2 : Mode Analysis for obtaining the Mode shapes and Mass Participation Factor.
Midas Civil Definition of Eigen value analysis with 20 Modes.
Mass Participation factor < 90 %
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
Step 2 : Mode Analysis for obtaining the Mode shapes and Mass Participation Factor.
Midas Civil Definition of Eigen value analysis with 50 Modes.
Mass Participation factor >90 %
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
Step 2 : Mode Analysis for obtaining the Mode shapes and Mass Participation Factor.
Midas Civil Definition of Eigen value analysis with 50 Modes.
Mass Participation factor >90 %
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
Step 3 : EDA Results RS X
Maximum Deflection : 2.911 inches
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
Step 3 : EDA Results RS Y
Maximum Deflection : 2.94 inches
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
Step 3 : Foundation Flexibility Effect Section 4.8
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
Step 3 : EDA Results RS Y
Maximum Deflection : 5.92 inches
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
Step 3 : EDA Results RS Y
Maximum Deflection : 4.94 inches
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 3. Determination of Demand midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation 100:30 rule:
Section 4.4
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 5. Determination of Capacity midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Displacement Capacity
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 5. Determination of Capacity midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Factors affecting Pushover Analysis
1. Non linear behavior of material 2. Type of load application 3. Non linear foundation behavior Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 5. Determination of Capacity midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Factors affecting Pushover Analysis
1. Non linear behavior of material: The non linear behavior of material is considered by the definition of the Plastic Hinges in the Model.
For Flexural Members : Moment Curvature is defined For Compression Members: PM interaction is considered
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 5. Determination of Capacity midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Factors affecting Pushover Analysis
2. Type of load application The load applied in increments are generally: 1. Uniform Acceleration 2. Mode Shape Based
Model 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
Model 4 3 2 1 8 6 4 2 Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 5. Determination of Capacity midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Factors affecting Pushover Analysis
3. Non linear foundation behavior Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 5. Determination of Capacity midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Displacement Capacity Section 4.8.2
Code Considerations:
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 5. Determination of Capacity midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Displacement Capacity Section 4.8.2
Code Considerations: SDC D
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 5. Determination of Capacity midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Displacement Capacity
Set up of Pushover Model:
Step 1: Definition of Non Linear Property. 1. Length of Plastic Hinge Section: 4.11.6
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 5. Determination of Capacity midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Displacement Capacity
Set up of Pushover Model:
Step 2: Consideration of P-M Interaction curve in Hinge Determination.
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 5. Determination of Capacity midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Displacement Capacity
Set up of Pushover Model:
Pushover Curve: (X Direction)
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 5. Determination of Capacity midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Displacement Capacity
Set up of Pushover Model:
Pushover Curve: (Y Direction)
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 5. Determination of Capacity midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Displacement Capacity
Set up of Pushover Model:
Alter reinforcement
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 5. Determination of Capacity midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Displacement Capacity
Set up of Pushover Model:
Pushover Curve: (X Direction)
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 5. Determination of Capacity midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation Displacement Capacity
Set up of Pushover Model:
Pushover Curve: (Y Direction)
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 6. Response Spectrum Analysis considering P Delta midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation P-Delta Analysis can significantly affect the performance of the structure under the earthquake loading.
Effect on RS X My and Mz
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 6. Response Spectrum Analysis considering P Delta midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation P-Delta Analysis can significantly affect the performance of the structure under the earthquake loading.
Effect on RS X Deformation:
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 6. Pushover Analysis: New Developments midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Modal Pushover Analysis (MPA) : Multi mode pushover and then combining them is in appropriate. Single Mode Pushover Analysis does not present a accurate picture for higher modes and hence modal pushover analysis is proposed.
1. Load Pattern: The load pattern for the MPA is based on Mode Shapes. Any number of modes can be used but since the mass participation reduces, a few modes are taken.
Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 6. Pushover Analysis: New Developments midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Modal Pushover Analysis (MPA) : Multi mode pushover and then combining them is in appropriate. Single Mode Pushover Analysis does not present a accurate picture for higher modes and hence modal pushover analysis is proposed.
2. Perform Pushover Analysis for each Load Pattern.
Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 6. Pushover Analysis: New Developments midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Modal Pushover Analysis (MPA) : Multi mode pushover and then combining them is in appropriate. Single Mode Pushover Analysis does not present a accurate picture for higher modes and hence modal pushover analysis is proposed.
3. Convert the Pushover curve to SA vs. SD Format 4. Compare Pushover curve to demand.
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 6. Pushover Analysis: New Developments midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation MAJOR PROBLEMS IN CURRENT PUSHOVER ANALYSIS PROCEDURES:
1. Single-mode analysis: Only one Mode is considered for Pushover Analysis
2. Modal Pushover Analysis (MPA) : Multi mode pushover and then combining them is inappropriate.
Solution: INCREMENTAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS (IRSA) IRSA is developed as a multi-mode process in which modal displacements are calculated incrementally until they reach their peak values, i.e., inelastic spectral displacements in each mode. This is achieved by applying a piecewise linear Response Spectrum Analysis (RSA) procedure at each incremental step in between the formation of the two consecutive plastic hinges
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities 5. Determination of Capacity midas Civil Demand & Capacity Evaluation INCREMENTAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS (IRSA):
Multi-mode pushover analysis procedure IRSA (Incremental Response Spectrum Analysis) is essentially based on a piecewise linear Response Spectrum Analysis (RSA) applied at each incremental step of analysis.