You are on page 1of 51

Bridging Your Innovations to Realities

Pushover and Response Spectrum Analysis


Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
1. Introduction
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Case Study:

Seismic Design Check of a Skewed Steel Bridge




Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
Force Based Design :
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
F
D
D
F
D
u

F
E
D
y

Elastic Analysis

Inelastic
Response

F
P
Design Load F
P
= F
E
/ R
R

1

R = Response Modification Factor
R = D
u
/ D
y
, represent the ductility
capacity of the ERS

Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
Displacement-Based Design:
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Displacement-Based Design:
F
D
D
F
D
u

D
y

Elastic Analysis

Inelastic
Response

F
P
Equal Displacement Assumption: Displacements
resulted from inelastic response is approximately
equal to displacement obtained from linear elastic
response spectrum analysis.
Design Load is simply F
P.

What to be checked:

D
D
D
u
D
D

Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
Seismic Design
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Comparison of two Design Approaches:
Force

AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design
Specification
Complete design for STR, SERV limit
state first
Elastic demand forces divided by
Response Modification Factor R
Ductile response is assumed to be
adequate without verification
Capacity protection assumed
Displacement

AASHTO Guide Specification for
LRFD Seismic Bridge Design
Complete design for STR, SERV limit
state first
Displacement demands checked
against displacement capacity
Ductile response is assured with
limitations prescribed for each SDC
Capacity protection assured
Capacity Protection:
Column Shear Capacity
Pier Cap
Foundation
Joint
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
2. Code Provisions
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Code Provisions:

Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
SDC D:

Step 1: Displacement Analysis
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
SDC D: Step 1: Displacement Analysis
Engineer Considerations:
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
SDC D: Step 1: Displacement Analysis

Consideration 2:

The periods can be obtained from the Eigenvalue
Analysis.

The user can perform the eigenvalue analysis in
Midas civil and can obtain the periods in the
Longitudinal and the transverse direction.

Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
SDC D: Step 1: Displacement Analysis

Analysis Procedure

We will follow Elastic Dynamic Analysis

Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Elastic Dynamic Analysis:

Code Considerations:
Section 5.4.3
1. At least 90 % Mass Participation in Longitudinal and Transverse
direction
2. Damping : 5%
3. EDA Mode results must be combined by CQC method
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Elastic Dynamic Analysis:

Factors Affecting Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
1. Design Spectra: Site Conditions, return period etc.
2. Behavior of Structure: Elastically Linear and Damped
3. Foundation Behavior: Linear
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Elastic Dynamic Analysis:

Factors Affecting Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
1. Design Spectra: Site Conditions, return period etc.
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Elastic Dynamic Analysis:

Factors Affecting Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
2. Behavior of Structure: Elastically Linear and Damped

> The structure is supposed to behaves linearly.

> The Design Spectra Changes with Damping. Damping can be
different in different modes.




Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Elastic Dynamic Analysis:

Factors Affecting Elastic Dynamic Analysis:
3. Foundation Behavior: Linear
















Load vs. Displacement curve for Soil Springs
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Elastic Dynamic Analysis:

Step1: Generation of Response Spectra:
AASHTO LRFD specifies detailed guidelines on the generation of the
Response Spectra based on the notional Ground Motion maps given
and site factors described in Article 3.4.2


Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Elastic Dynamic Analysis:

Step1: Generation of Response Spectra:


Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Elastic Dynamic Analysis:

Step1: Generation of Response Spectra:


Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Elastic Dynamic Analysis:

Step1: Generation of Response Spectra: Midas Civil


Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Elastic Dynamic Analysis:

Step 2 : Mode Analysis for obtaining the Mode shapes and Mass
Participation Factor.

Midas Civil Definition of Eigen value analysis with 20 Modes.















Mass Participation factor < 90 %

Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Elastic Dynamic Analysis:

Step 2 : Mode Analysis for obtaining the Mode shapes and Mass
Participation Factor.

Midas Civil Definition of Eigen value analysis with 50 Modes.















Mass Participation factor >90 %

Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Elastic Dynamic Analysis:

Step 2 : Mode Analysis for obtaining the Mode shapes and Mass
Participation Factor.

Midas Civil Definition of Eigen value analysis with 50 Modes.















Mass Participation factor >90 %

Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Elastic Dynamic Analysis:

Step 3 : Effective Section Properties
Section 5.6.1




















Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Elastic Dynamic Analysis:

Step 3 : EDA Results RS X

Maximum Deflection : 2.911 inches



















Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Elastic Dynamic Analysis:

Step 3 : EDA Results RS Y

Maximum Deflection : 2.94 inches



















Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Elastic Dynamic Analysis:

Step 3 : Foundation Flexibility Effect
Section 4.8




















Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Elastic Dynamic Analysis:

Step 3 : EDA Results RS Y

Maximum Deflection : 5.92 inches



















Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Elastic Dynamic Analysis:

Step 3 : EDA Results RS Y

Maximum Deflection : 4.94 inches



















Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
3. Determination of Demand
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
100:30 rule:

Section 4.4





















Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
5. Determination of Capacity
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Displacement Capacity






















Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
5. Determination of Capacity
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Factors affecting Pushover Analysis

1. Non linear behavior of material
2. Type of load application
3. Non linear foundation behavior
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
5. Determination of Capacity
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Factors affecting Pushover Analysis

1. Non linear behavior of material:
The non linear behavior of material is considered by the definition
of the Plastic Hinges in the Model.

For Flexural Members : Moment Curvature is defined
For Compression Members: PM interaction is considered











Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
5. Determination of Capacity
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Factors affecting Pushover Analysis

2. Type of load application
The load applied in increments are generally:
1. Uniform Acceleration
2. Mode Shape Based




Model
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2




Model
4
3
2
1
8
6
4
2
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
5. Determination of Capacity
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Factors affecting Pushover Analysis

3. Non linear foundation behavior
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
5. Determination of Capacity
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Displacement Capacity
Section 4.8.2

Code Considerations:




















Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
5. Determination of Capacity
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Displacement Capacity
Section 4.8.2

Code Considerations: SDC D




















Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
5. Determination of Capacity
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Displacement Capacity

Set up of Pushover Model:

Step 1: Definition of Non Linear Property.
1. Length of Plastic Hinge Section: 4.11.6


















Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
5. Determination of Capacity
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Displacement Capacity

Set up of Pushover Model:

Step 2: Consideration of P-M Interaction curve in Hinge
Determination.


















Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
5. Determination of Capacity
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Displacement Capacity

Set up of Pushover Model:

Pushover Curve: (X Direction)



















Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
5. Determination of Capacity
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Displacement Capacity

Set up of Pushover Model:

Pushover Curve: (Y Direction)



















Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
5. Determination of Capacity
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Displacement Capacity

Set up of Pushover Model:

Alter reinforcement



















Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
5. Determination of Capacity
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Displacement Capacity

Set up of Pushover Model:

Pushover Curve: (X Direction)



















Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
5. Determination of Capacity
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
Displacement Capacity

Set up of Pushover Model:

Pushover Curve: (Y Direction)



















Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
6. Response Spectrum Analysis considering P Delta
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
P-Delta Analysis can significantly affect the performance of the
structure under the earthquake loading.

Effect on RS X My and Mz




















Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
6. Response Spectrum Analysis considering P Delta
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
P-Delta Analysis can significantly affect the performance of the
structure under the earthquake loading.

Effect on RS X Deformation:




















Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
6. Pushover Analysis: New Developments
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation

Modal Pushover Analysis (MPA) : Multi mode pushover and then combining them is in appropriate.
Single Mode Pushover Analysis does not present a accurate picture for higher modes and hence modal
pushover analysis is proposed.

1. Load Pattern: The load pattern for the MPA is based on Mode Shapes. Any number of modes can be
used but since the mass participation reduces, a few modes are taken.











Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3





Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
6. Pushover Analysis: New Developments
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation

Modal Pushover Analysis (MPA) : Multi mode pushover and then combining them is in appropriate.
Single Mode Pushover Analysis does not present a accurate picture for higher modes and hence modal
pushover analysis is proposed.

2. Perform Pushover Analysis for each Load Pattern.












Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3





Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
6. Pushover Analysis: New Developments
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation

Modal Pushover Analysis (MPA) : Multi mode pushover and then combining them is in appropriate.
Single Mode Pushover Analysis does not present a accurate picture for higher modes and hence modal
pushover analysis is proposed.

3. Convert the Pushover curve to SA vs. SD Format
4. Compare Pushover curve to demand.

















Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
6. Pushover Analysis: New Developments
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
MAJOR PROBLEMS IN CURRENT PUSHOVER ANALYSIS PROCEDURES:


1. Single-mode analysis: Only one Mode is considered for Pushover Analysis

2. Modal Pushover Analysis (MPA) : Multi mode pushover and then combining them is inappropriate.

Solution:
INCREMENTAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS (IRSA)
IRSA is developed as a multi-mode process in which modal displacements are calculated incrementally until
they reach their peak values, i.e., inelastic spectral displacements in each mode. This is achieved by applying
a piecewise linear Response Spectrum Analysis (RSA) procedure at each incremental step in between the
formation of the two consecutive plastic hinges











Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
5. Determination of Capacity
midas Civil
Demand & Capacity Evaluation
INCREMENTAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS (IRSA):

Multi-mode pushover analysis procedure IRSA (Incremental Response Spectrum Analysis) is essentially
based on a piecewise linear Response Spectrum Analysis (RSA) applied at each incremental step of
analysis.



















Thanks
ts@midasuser.com

You might also like