Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(
9
5
%
C
I
)
a
O
R
(
9
5
%
C
I
)
a
l
l
v
a
r
i
a
b
l
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
m
o
d
e
l
H
i
t
t
w
i
c
e
o
r
m
o
r
e
n
(
%
o
f
c
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
i
n
r
e
s
p
e
c
t
i
v
e
g
r
o
u
p
)
c
O
R
(
9
5
%
C
I
)
a
O
R
(
9
5
%
C
I
)
a
l
l
v
a
r
i
a
b
l
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
m
o
d
e
l
G
e
n
d
e
r
B
o
y
s
3
5
4
4
(
8
5
.
6
)
3
4
3
(
8
.
3
)
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
g
r
o
u
p
2
5
7
(
6
.
3
)
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
g
r
o
u
p
G
i
r
l
s
3
4
6
8
(
8
3
.
3
)
4
0
9
(
9
.
8
)
1
.
2
(
1
.
0
5
1
.
4
2
)
*
1
.
0
(
0
.
8
7
1
.
2
4
)
2
8
5
(
6
.
8
)
1
.
1
(
0
.
9
5
1
.
3
5
)
0
.
8
(
0
.
6
6
1
.
0
4
)
P
a
r
e
n
t
s
e
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
B
o
t
h
p
a
r
e
n
t
s
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
d
5
6
8
4
(
8
6
.
2
)
5
4
1
(
8
.
2
)
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
g
r
o
u
p
3
6
8
(
5
.
6
)
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
g
r
o
u
p
O
n
e
p
a
r
e
n
t
u
n
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
d
o
n
s
i
c
k
l
e
a
v
e
8
5
6
(
7
8
.
2
)
1
3
5
(
1
2
.
3
)
1
.
7
(
1
.
3
5
2
.
0
3
)
*
*
*
1
.
1
(
0
.
8
7
1
.
4
3
)
1
0
4
(
9
.
5
)
1
.
9
(
1
.
5
0
2
.
3
6
)
*
*
*
0
.
9
2
(
0
.
6
9
1
.
2
7
)
B
o
t
h
p
a
r
e
n
t
s
u
n
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
d
o
n
s
i
c
k
l
e
a
v
e
9
7
(
7
4
.
6
)
1
0
(
7
.
7
)
1
.
1
(
0
.
5
6
2
.
0
0
)
0
.
5
(
0
.
2
2
1
.
3
4
)
2
3
(
1
7
.
7
)
3
.
7
(
2
.
3
0
5
.
8
4
)
*
*
*
1
.
4
(
0
.
6
5
2
.
9
2
)
A
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
i
v
a
t
e
h
o
u
s
e
,
a
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
5
7
5
9
(
8
5
.
4
)
5
8
6
(
8
.
7
)
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
g
r
o
u
p
4
0
0
(
5
,
9
)
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
g
r
o
u
p
R
e
n
t
e
d
a
t
1
1
9
5
(
8
0
.
5
)
1
6
0
(
1
0
.
8
)
1
.
3
(
1
.
0
9
1
.
5
8
)
*
*
*
1
.
0
(
0
.
7
7
1
.
2
9
)
1
3
0
(
8
.
8
)
1
.
6
(
1
.
2
7
1
.
9
3
)
*
*
*
0
.
7
(
0
.
5
4
1
.
0
4
)
C
h
i
l
d
l
i
v
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
B
o
t
h
p
a
r
e
n
t
s
4
3
9
4
(
8
7
.
9
)
3
7
8
(
7
.
6
)
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
g
r
o
u
p
2
2
7
(
4
.
5
)
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
g
r
o
u
p
S
i
n
g
l
e
p
a
r
e
n
t
s
w
i
t
h
j
o
i
n
t
c
u
s
t
o
d
y
1
2
7
5
(
8
2
.
7
)
1
7
3
(
1
1
.
2
)
1
.
6
(
1
.
3
0
1
.
9
1
)
*
*
*
1
.
2
(
0
.
9
8
1
.
5
3
)
9
4
(
6
.
1
)
1
.
4
(
1
.
1
1
1
.
8
3
)
*
*
1
.
0
(
0
.
7
7
1
.
4
1
)
S
i
n
g
l
e
p
a
r
e
n
t
5
9
8
(
7
6
.
1
)
9
1
(
1
1
.
6
)
1
.
8
(
1
.
3
9
2
.
2
6
)
*
*
*
1
.
1
(
0
.
7
7
1
.
5
1
)
9
7
(
1
2
.
3
)
3
.
1
(
2
.
4
4
4
.
0
4
)
*
*
*
1
.
9
(
1
.
3
5
2
.
8
0
)
*
*
*
P
a
r
e
n
t
a
n
d
s
t
e
p
p
a
r
e
n
t
3
5
1
(
7
8
.
0
)
5
8
(
1
2
.
9
)
1
.
9
(
1
.
4
3
2
.
5
9
)
*
*
*
1
.
2
(
0
.
8
2
1
.
7
5
)
4
1
(
9
.
1
)
2
.
3
(
1
.
5
9
3
.
2
1
)
*
*
*
0
.
9
(
0
.
5
6
1
.
5
4
)
F
o
s
t
e
r
h
o
m
e
9
6
(
6
5
.
8
)
2
3
(
1
5
.
8
)
2
.
8
(
1
.
7
5
4
.
4
4
)
*
*
*
1
.
9
(
1
.
0
7
3
.
4
8
)
*
2
7
(
1
8
.
5
)
5
.
4
(
3
.
4
8
8
.
5
2
)
*
*
*
2
.
1
(
1
.
0
7
4
.
2
9
)
*
P
a
r
e
n
t
f
o
r
e
i
g
n
b
o
r
n
N
o
p
a
r
e
n
t
f
o
r
e
i
g
n
b
o
r
n
6
1
2
4
(
8
6
.
5
)
6
2
1
(
8
.
7
)
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
g
r
o
u
p
4
1
4
(
5
.
8
)
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
g
r
o
u
p
1
p
a
r
e
n
t
f
o
r
e
i
g
n
b
o
r
n
7
6
6
(
7
6
.
5
)
1
2
0
(
1
2
.
0
)
1
.
5
(
1
.
2
5
1
.
9
0
)
*
*
*
1
.
7
(
1
.
2
9
2
.
2
4
)
*
*
*
1
1
5
(
1
1
.
5
)
2
.
2
(
1
.
7
8
2
.
7
7
)
*
*
*
2
.
2
(
1
.
5
5
3
.
0
0
)
*
*
*
C
h
i
l
d
w
i
t
h
d
i
s
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
r
d
i
s
e
a
s
e
N
o
d
i
s
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
6
2
8
7
(
8
5
.
3
)
6
5
4
(
8
.
9
)
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
g
r
o
u
p
4
3
0
(
5
.
8
)
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
g
r
o
u
p
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
d
i
s
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
6
6
(
6
7
.
3
)
1
3
(
1
3
.
3
)
1
.
9
(
1
.
0
4
3
.
4
5
)
*
1
.
1
(
0
.
4
7
2
.
5
0
)
1
9
(
1
9
.
4
)
4
.
2
(
2
.
5
0
7
.
0
8
)
*
*
*
1
.
0
(
0
.
3
8
2
.
8
0
)
P
s
y
c
h
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
d
i
s
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
2
1
2
(
6
6
.
2
)
5
0
(
1
5
.
6
)
2
.
3
(
1
.
6
5
3
.
1
2
)
*
*
*
1
.
7
(
1
.
0
7
2
.
5
7
)
*
5
8
(
1
8
.
1
)
4
.
0
(
2
.
9
4
5
.
4
3
)
*
*
*
1
.
8
(
1
.
0
9
2
.
9
5
)
*
C
h
r
o
n
i
c
d
i
s
e
a
s
e
3
8
4
(
7
7
.
1
)
4
6
(
9
.
2
)
1
.
2
(
0
.
8
4
1
.
5
8
)
0
.
9
(
0
.
5
8
1
.
3
0
)
6
8
(
1
3
.
7
)
2
.
6
(
1
.
9
7
3
.
4
1
)
*
*
*
1
.
9
(
1
.
2
8
2
.
8
1
)
*
*
C
h
i
l
d
s
s
o
c
i
a
l
n
e
t
w
o
r
k
S
u
f
c
i
e
n
t
n
e
t
w
o
r
k
6
4
7
3
(
8
6
.
0
)
6
5
3
(
8
.
7
)
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
g
r
o
u
p
4
0
4
(
5
.
4
)
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
g
r
o
u
p
I
n
s
u
f
c
i
e
n
t
n
e
t
w
o
r
k
5
0
9
(
6
8
.
1
)
1
0
2
(
1
3
.
7
)
2
.
0
(
1
.
5
8
2
.
4
9
)
*
*
*
1
.
7
1
.
3
1
2
.
2
9
*
*
*
1
3
6
(
1
8
.
2
)
4
.
3
(
3
.
4
6
5
.
3
0
)
*
*
*
3
.
0
(
2
.
2
4
4
.
1
1
)
*
*
*
P
a
r
e
n
t
a
l
i
n
t
i
m
a
t
e
-
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
v
i
o
l
e
n
c
e
N
e
v
e
r
6
5
6
4
(
8
9
.
7
)
4
9
1
(
6
.
7
)
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
g
r
o
u
p
2
6
0
(
3
.
6
)
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
g
r
o
u
p
Y
e
s
,
o
n
c
e
o
r
t
w
i
c
e
2
9
9
(
4
8
.
4
)
2
0
7
(
3
3
.
5
)
9
.
3
(
7
.
5
8
1
1
.
3
0
)
*
*
*
8
.
0
6
.
3
4
1
0
.
1
3
*
*
*
1
1
2
(
1
8
.
1
)
9
.
5
(
7
.
3
6
1
2
.
1
4
)
*
*
*
6
.
9
(
5
.
0
5
9
.
4
2
)
*
*
*
Y
e
s
,
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
t
i
m
e
s
8
3
(
2
7
.
9
)
5
0
(
1
6
.
8
)
8
.
1
(
5
.
6
0
1
1
.
5
8
)
*
*
*
7
.
8
5
.
1
4
1
1
.
9
7
*
*
*
1
6
4
(
5
5
.
2
)
4
9
.
9
(
3
7
.
2
6
6
6
.
7
8
)
*
*
*
3
5
.
1
(
2
4
.
2
6
5
0
.
8
3
)
*
*
*
c
O
R
=
c
r
u
d
e
o
d
d
s
r
a
t
i
o
;
a
O
R
=
a
d
j
u
s
t
e
d
o
d
d
s
r
a
t
i
o
.
O
d
d
s
r
a
t
i
o
w
i
t
h
n
e
v
e
r
h
i
t
a
s
t
h
e
c
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
g
r
o
u
p
.
A
l
l
8
v
a
r
i
a
b
l
e
s
w
e
r
e
e
n
t
e
r
e
d
s
i
m
u
l
t
a
n
e
o
u
s
l
y
i
n
a
m
u
l
t
i
v
a
r
i
a
t
e
l
o
g
i
s
t
i
c
r
e
g
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
m
o
d
e
l
.
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
d
r
o
p
-
o
u
t
3
.
5
%
.
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
d
r
o
p
-
o
u
t
i
s
8
.
0
%
.
*
p
<
0
.
0
5
,
*
*
p
<
0
.
0
1
,
*
*
*
p
<
0
.
0
0
1
.
Prevalence and characteristics of child physical abuse Annerba ck et al.
1232 2010 The Author(s)/Journal Compilation 2010 Foundation Acta Pdiatrica/Acta Pdiatrica 2010 99, pp. 12291236
Characteristics
The association between risk factors on different levels and
the prevalence of CPA are shown in Table 1. In summary,
most of the known risk factors that were asked for in the
survey had a univariate association with physical abuse. In
the multivariate logistic regression model, living in foster
home, parent foreign born, psychological disability, insuf-
cient social network and parental intimate-partner violence
were signicant on 95% CI for being hit once. The same
variables and in addition the variables living with a single
parent and chronic disease were signicant for being hit
twice or more.
Parental intimate-partner violence
Of the total group, 915 (10.8%) children reported that vio-
lence had occurred between the adults in their families. Of
these 533 (58%) reported that they themselves had been hit
once or more. The perpetrators of violence against the child
in this group were men (fathers or and mothers partner) in
386 (55%) cases and women (mothers or and fathers part-
ner) in 318 cases (45%) (n.s.). (Some children reported
more than one perpetrator.) The proportion of male and
female perpetrators when the children had reported that
they had been hit once or twice was 51% and 49%, respec-
tively and, when they reported that they have been hit more
than twice, the proportions male and female were 61% and
39%, respectively. The difference between gender of perpe-
trators who had hit 12 times and those who had hit more
than two times was statistically signicant (p = 0.004).
Accumulation of risk factors
We determined the number of risk areas according to the
four categories (occurrence of parental intimate-partner
violence; socio-economic stress on the family; insufcient
social network; child with disability and or chronic disease)
for every single child and calculated mean values. The num-
ber of children who did not report any risk was 4590, 2840
reported one risk, 785 two risks, 78 three and 25 reported
four risks. The mean value for the whole group was 0.57.
Children who reported that they never had been hit had a
mean value of 0.47 risks per person. Those who had been
hit once had 0.94 risks per person and those who had been
hit twice or more had 1.33 risks per person. In all four
groups, the range was 04. The differences between the
groups were signicant (p < 0.001). Also the post hoc analy-
sis showed a signicant difference (p < 0.001) between the
means in the three groups with a doseresponse relation-
ship between risk and reported CPA.
Who knows about the violence against the child?
Only 32% of all the children who reported that they had
been exposed to CPA had told an adult person about this.
More than one third of the children had not told anyone.
(Table 3).
DISCUSSION
In this cross-sectional study, we examined prevalence rates
of CPA, abuse characteristics and tested a hypothesis of
accumulative risk factors. The results can be summarized in
seven main ndings.
Prevalence rates
It was found that 15% of all children had been exposed to
violence by parents or caretakers during their childhood.
The youngest children in grade 7 in compulsory school
reported CPA to a lesser degree than the older did. The g-
ure of prevalence in this study is somewhat higher in com-
parison with two other studies performed in Sweden during
the last decade (3,4). One possible explanation of this might
be that there are slightly worse socio-economic conditions
in this particular county than in Sweden as a whole (24).
However, there was no continued decrease of prevalence
between the 2000 and 2006 surveys as there had been
between 2000 and the study in 1994 (6). Whether there is a
trend of increasing prevalence of CPA in Sweden or not is
an important issue for future research to follow up. The
prevalence rate of CPA is lower in this study as well as in
previous Swedish studies compared with the rate reported
in studies from other western European countries; for
example in Denmark and England, the corresponding g-
ures for prevalence were 24% and 25%, respectively (25,26).
Contribution of gender amongst the perpetrators
In this study, the percentage of female perpetrators was
almost the same as for male perpetrators of CPA. This result
conrms what other studies have revealed (4,12,13) but
forms a sharp contrast to the proportions in the crime-sta-
tistics of Sweden where men are strongly over-represented
(7).
Table 3 Disclosures of child physical abuse
Have you told anyone
that you have been hit?
Hit once
(n = 752), %
Hit twice or
more (n = 542), %
Ever hit
(n = 1294), %
Not told 41 28 36
Siblings, peers 46 59 52
Parents 20 24 22
Authorities* 3 13 7
BRIS or similar
2 5 3
The sum is >100% because some pupils answered more than one alternative.
*Authority means personnel in school, social services, police and similar.
*Percent of the children who reported that they had been hit.
Five hundred and eight children answered more than one alternative.
Annerba ck et al. Prevalence and characteristics of child physical abuse
2010 The Author(s)/Journal Compilation 2010 Foundation Acta Pdiatrica/Acta Pdiatrica 2010 99, pp. 12291236 1233
Disclosures of child physical abuse
Our results showed, that the experiences children have of
being exposed to violence are hidden to a high degree from
the adult society. This nding is a conrmation of what an
earlier Swedish study had found about disclosures of child
sexual abuse (27). That only 7% had told personnel from
authorities indicates that the increase of police-reports in
Sweden still only represents a fraction of the real numbers
of CPA.
Risk factors
The results from this study conrmed that CPA is associated
with several risk factors on different levels which can indi-
cate stress and strain on the family (2,9). There seemed to
be a doseresponse effect insofar as that the children report-
ing that they had been hit more than once generally
reported higher numbers of risk factors. In the crude analy-
ses, there were strong correlations between almost all of the
risk factors asked for in this survey and exposure of CPA.
When controlling for confounding, we found that many of
the social and economic factors were associated with each
other. There was strong association between living in foster
homes and CPA and also with living with a single parent
and CPA. In both these cases, there are at least two possible
interpretations. One explanation is that the children are
exposed to violence by foster parents or by the single parent
and another is that the children had been exposed at an ear-
lier stage of their lives or to a perpetrator outside the actual
family setting. Having an insufcient social network was
associated with CPA also in the adjusted analyses as was
the childs psychological disability. Having a chronic dis-
ease was correlated with being hit twice or more. The result
that children with diseases or disabilities are at higher risk
for abuse conrms other studies (22,28) and it is important
to acknowledge that these children might place increased
demands on adults and indicate a situation of strain in the
family.
Parental intimate-partner violence
The strong association between CPA and parental intimate-
partner violence was an important nding of this study and
conrmed prior studies (10,11,23,29). Our results revealed
that the children had not only been witnessing and been
aware of the violence between the adults in the family, but
had also to a great extent themselves been exposed to vio-
lence. Another important nding was that the proportion of
male perpetrators was almost the same as the proportion of
female perpetrators but men were overrepresented in cases
when children had been hit several times. Men in cases
where parental intimate-partner violence was reported were
in this respect responsible for more severe abuse. The rela-
tion between parental intimate-partner violence and CPA
needs to be studied in a comprehensive way and from more
perspectives than the general perspective that men are abus-
ing women and children. Researchers have most often
focused on either CPA or intimate-partner violence and
then overlooked the overlap between these two aspects of
violence in families. This has led to a fragmentation both of
the understanding of this phenomenon and of the societal
responses to it (30).
Parent foreign born
There was a strong association in this study, as in prior stud-
ies, between foreign born parents and CPA (18,19) and the
association remained after adjusting for other variables
including socio-economic variables as parental employment
and housing. The results showed that the explanation that
this group is living under poorer social conditions than
Swedish-born people is relevant but not sufcient. A differ-
ent view of child rearing, where violence is more generally
accepted could also be a partial explanation. In addition, we
have to acknowledge that families in which one or both par-
ents were born outside of Sweden constitute a group faced
with a high frequency of problems also on the individual
level. These problems could derive from experiences both
from their country of origin and from their stranger-position
in Sweden (23).
Accumulation of risk factors
Our results conrmed the hypothesis of accumulation of
risk factors on different levels as a condition for CPA even
though there are several variables of importance that we
could not ask for in this survey, variables such as, for exam-
ple, parental psychiatric illness, addiction, socio-economic
status and characteristics of the familys social network.
This model implies that risk assessment as well as preven-
tive and treatment interventions should be carried out on all
four levels: (i) Is there an adult person in the family with a
tendency to use violence in conict situations? (ii) To what
extent is the family exposed to stress and strain and what
interventions can be carried out to reduce these conditions?
(iii) Is the childs and the familys social network weakened
and or insufcient? and (iv) In what respects could the
child face obstacles that make it difcult to protect him- or
herself?
Strengths and limitations
This study is the largest study in Sweden of prevalence and
characteristics of CPA. The statistical power is very high
and the overall response rate is high. The large sample
enables us to determine associations between different vari-
ables and CPA also in relatively small subgroups. The results
of this study may be generalized to other children in Sweden
because there are only marginal differences between the
socio-demographical conditions in So dermanland County
as in Sweden as a whole.
Still there is a risk that the validity of the childrens
answers could be reduced by recall biases especially as ques-
tions about violence may be sensitive to deal with, which
could lead to an underestimation of the prevalence rate.
This is, however, not shown in the response-rates, as there
was a low internal drop-out of the questions about violence.
The lower rate of reported CPA amongst the youngest chil-
dren could yet be an example of recall bias as these probably
are more loyal to and dependent on their families than the
older are and therefore less willing to recall or report
Prevalence and characteristics of child physical abuse Annerba ck et al.
1234 2010 The Author(s)/Journal Compilation 2010 Foundation Acta Pdiatrica/Acta Pdiatrica 2010 99, pp. 12291236
difculties in their homes. Another problem with the design
is that it is not possible to ask children about certain kinds
of information about family conditions, as they do not have
the knowledge of them. One example is that we asked for
the parents education level but the internal drop-out of this
question was more than 30%, and therefore, we have not
been able to use that information. This limits the quantity of
information about various relevant back-ground factors.
Finally, one limitation in this survey is that it only asked for
life-time experiences of CPA. Questions about experiences
from for example the past year would have made it possible
to determine at what age the children had been exposed to
violence.
In conclusion, this study shows that violence against chil-
dren still may be considered widespread in Sweden because
almost every sixth child is exposed to a behaviour that has
been prohibited in this country for more than 30 years. It is
still a considerable problem, which needs to be taken care
of by politicians and authorities who are responsible for the
welfare of children. Methods of assessment and interven-
tions need to be improved. It is a challenge for the interdis-
ciplinary eld working with CPA to develop methods that
will ensure that the violence and its underlying causes are
directly addressed.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The study was made possible by grants from Centre for
Research and Development Centre for Clinical Research,
So dermanland County council, Sweden. Valuable statistical
support has been given from Statisticians at Centre for
Research and Development, So rmland County council,
Sweden.
References
1. Gilbert R, Widom CS, Browne K, Fergusson D, Webb E, Janson
S. Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-
income countries. Lancet 2009; 373: 6881.
2. Pinheiro PS. World report on violence against children.
Geneva: United Nation, 2006.
3. Statens offentliga utredningar. Barn och misshandel: en rapport
om kroppslig bestraffning och annan misshandel i Sverige vid
slutet av 1900-talet.(Children and abuse a report of physical
punishment and other types of abuse in Sweden). (In Swedish).
Stockholm, 2001: 18.
4. Stiftelsen Allma nna Barnhuset. Va ld mot barn 2006-2007 en
nationell kartla ggning. (Violence against children a national
survey 2006-2007). (In Swedish). Stockholm, 2007: 4.
5. Gelles RJ, Edfeldt AW. Violence towards children in the United
States and Sweden. Child Abuse Negl 1986; 10: 50110.
6. Statistiska centralbyra n. Barn och aga : en underso kning om
vuxnas och ho gstadieelevers insta llning, erfarenheter och kuns-
kap. (Children and physical punishment. A survey of adultsand
pupilsattitudes, experiences and knowledge). Stockholm,
1996: 1.1.
7. Brottsfo rebyggande ra det. A
, Fernandes E, Matos
R. History of childhood abuse in Portuguese parents. Child
Abuse Negl 2004; 28: 67184.
16. Maker AH, Shah PV, Agha Z. Child Physical abuse: prevalence,
characteristics, predictors, and beliefs about parent-child vio-
lence in South Asian, Middle Eastern, East Asian, and Latina
Women in the United States. J Interpers Violence 2005; 20:
140628.
17. Tang CS-k. Corporal punishment and physical maltreatment
against children: a community study on Chinese parents in
Hong Kong. Child Abuse Negl 2006; 30: 893907.
18. Annerback EM, Lindell C, Svedin CG, Gustafsson PA. Severe
child abuse: a study of cases reported to the police. Acta
Paediatr 2007; 96: 17604.
19. Lindell C, Svedin CG. Physical child abuse in Sweden: a study
of police reports between 1986 and 1996. Soc Psychiatry
Psychiatr Epidemiol 2001; 36: 1507.
20. Youssef RM, Attia MS-E-D, Kamel MI. Children experiencing
violence I: parental use of corporal punishment. Child Abuse
Negl 1998; 22: 95973.
21. Olivan Gonzalvo G. Maltreatment of children with disabilities:
characteristics and risk factors. An Esp Pediatr 2002; 56:
21923.
22. Sullivan PM, Knutson JF. The prevalence of disabilities and
maltreatment among runaway children. Child Abuse Negl
2000; 24: 127588.
23. Annerback EM, Svedin CG, Gustafsson PA Characteristic
features of severe child physical abuse a multi-informant
approach. J Fam Violence. 2009. DOI 10.1007/s10896-
009-9280-1.
24. Statistiska centralbyra n. Befolkningsstatistik. (Statistics of
Sweden. Population statistics). (In Swedish). [Cited November
18, 2009] Available from: http://www.scb.se/Pages/list____
250612.aspx.
25. Statens institut for Folkesundhed. Unges trivsel A
r 2008 En
underso gelse med fokus pa seksuelle overgreb og vold i barn-
dom og tidlig ungdom. (Youthswell- being 2008 A survey
with focus on sexual abuse and violence in childhood and early
youth). (In Danish). Ko penhamn, 2009.
26. May-Chahal C, Cawson P. Measuring child maltreatment in the
United Kingdom: a study of the prevalence of child abuse and
neglect. Child Abuse Negl 2005; 29: 96984.
27. Priebe G, Svedin CG. Child sexual abuse is largely hidden
from the adult society: an epidemiological study of adolescents
disclosures. Child Abuse Negl 2008; 32: 1095108.
Annerba ck et al. Prevalence and characteristics of child physical abuse
2010 The Author(s)/Journal Compilation 2010 Foundation Acta Pdiatrica/Acta Pdiatrica 2010 99, pp. 12291236 1235
28. Jaudes PK, Mackey-Bilaver L. Do chronic conditions increase
young childrens risk of being maltreated? Child Abuse Negl
2008; 32: 67181.
29. Almqvist K, Broberg A. Barn som bevittnat va ld mot mamma
en studie om kvinnor och barn som vistas pa kvinnojourer i
Go teborg. (Children who have stayed in womens crisis center
in Go tebrog) (In Swedish). Go teborgs stad, 2003.
30. Edleson JL. The overlap between child maltreatment and
woman battering. Violence Against Women. 1999;5:134. DOI:
101177 107780129952003.
Prevalence and characteristics of child physical abuse Annerba ck et al.
1236 2010 The Author(s)/Journal Compilation 2010 Foundation Acta Pdiatrica/Acta Pdiatrica 2010 99, pp. 12291236