You are on page 1of 15

2ECONSIDERING3ILENT3USTAINED


2EADING!N%XPLORATORY3TUDY
OF3CAFFOLDED3ILENT2EADING
$2!92%54:%,
0!2+%2#&!73/.
*/(.!3-)4(
5TAH3TATE5NIVERSITY

!"342!#44HEPURPOSEOFTHISSTUDYWASTODESIGN IMPLE FERENTSCHOOLSETTINGS WHICHINTRODUCEDSCHOOLEFFECTSTHAT


MENT AND EVALUATE THE EFFICACY OF SCAFFOLDED SILENT READING RESEARCHERSACCOUNTEDFORNEITHERINTHEDESIGNSNORINTHE
3C32 COMPARED WITH THE EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE OF GUIDED ANALYSES#LINE+RETKE 3UMMERS-C#LELLAND
REPEATED ORAL READING '2/2 WITH FEEDBACK ON RD GRADE   /THER CONTROL OR COMPARISON GROUPS IN THE 332
STUDENTSFLUENCYANDCOMPREHENSIONGROWTH5SINGAMIXED
MODEL DOMINANT LESS DOMINANT DESIGN THE AUTHORS COLLECTED STUDIESVARIEDFROMTIMESPENTINREADINGSKILLSPRACTICETO
BOTH QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DATA 1UANTITATIVE RESULTS SPELLINGWORKANDFROMLESSONSONHEALTHANDGROOMINGTO
INDICATED NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THESE  FORMS OF THEUSEOFPROGRAMMEDMATERIALSIE TEXTS TAPES ANDSKILL
READING FLUENCY PRACTICE ON RD GRADE STUDENTS FLUENCY AND KITS "URLEY  #OLLINS  %VANS  4OWNER 
COMPREHENSION DEVELOPMENT WITH THE EXCEPTION OF  SIGNIFI ,ANGFORD!LLEN 2EUTZEL(OLLINGSWORTH  
CANT DIFFERENCE FAVORING 3C32 ON EXPRESSION OF A SINGLE PAS
SAGE1UALITATIVERESULTSINDICATEDTHATEITHER3C32OR'2/2 )NSOMEOFTHE332STUDIES RESEARCHERSFAILEDTOREPORTTHE
APPROACHESUSEDEXCLUSIVELYTENDEDTOWARDTEDIUMANDREDUCED NATURE OF THE REGULAR READING INSTRUCTION RECEIVED #LINE
OVERALLSTUDENTENJOYMENTANDMOTIVATION4HEAUTHORSDISCUSS  +RETKE ,ANGFORD  !LLEN OR SYSTEMATICALLY CONTROL
HOWTHE3C32APPROACHREPRESENTSAVIABLEALTERNATIVEORCOM FOR OVERALL TIME SPENT READING #LINE  +RETKE %VANS 
PANION TO '2/2 FOR PROMOTING RD GRADE STUDENTS READING 4OWNER,ANGFORD!LLEN 
FLUENCYANDCOMPREHENSIONGROWTH
7HEN 332 RESULTED IN SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES IN THESE
+EYWORDSCOMPREHENSION FLUENCY GUIDEDREADING INDEPEN
STUDIES THERESULTSRANGEDFROMINCREASEDWORDRECOGNITION
DENTREADING REPEATEDREADING ,ANGFORD  !LLEN  IN THE INTERMEDIATE GRADES TO
DIFFERENCESFAVORING332INJUNIORANDHIGHSCHOOLSETTINGS
FORVOCABULARYANDCOMPREHENSION"URLEY (OLT

0
/4UEL   )N ONE STUDY RESEARCHERS FOUND THAT 332
ERHAPS NO OTHER SINGLE CONCLUSION DRAWN BY THE WAS HELPFUL ONLY FOR AVERAGE ABILITY READERS IN THE EIGHTH
.ATIONAL 2EADING 0ANEL .20 .ATIONAL )NSTI GRADE BUT DID NOT HELP ABOVE OR BELOW AVERAGE READERS
TUTE OF #HILD (EALTH AND (UMAN $EVELOPMENT $AVIS   -ANNING AND -ANNING  FOUND THAT
;.)#(($=  HAS SPARKED MORE CONTROVERSY THAN A READING SCORES IMPROVED SLIGHTLY WHEN PEER DISCUSSION OR
REPORTEDLACKOFRESEARCHSUPPORTFORTIMESPENTREADINGAND TEACHER CONFERENCING WAS ADDED TO THE TRADITIONAL 332
THERELATED PREVALENTCLASSROOMPRACTICEOFSILENTSUSTAINED IMPLEMENTATION
READING 332 !LLINGTON  #OLES  *7 #UN /FTHE332STUDIESANALYZEDBYTHE.20.)#(($
NINGHAM  %DMONDSON  3HANNON  +RASHEN  IN  OF THE STUDIES RESEARCHERS REPORTED NO STA
 )NTHEPAST TEACHERSANDADMINISTRATORSHADINCOR TISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECT FOR 332 ON STUDENTS READING
PORATED332INTOTHEDAILYREADINGINSTRUCTIONALROUTINESOF ACHIEVEMENT OR GROWTH /F THE FIVE STUDIES IN WHICH
MANYCLASSROOMSANDSCHOOLSACROSSTHENATION RESEARCHERS DID FIND EFFECTS FAVORING 332 THE MAGNITUDE
4HE.20.)#(($  EXAMINEDTHEREADINGRESEARCH OFEFFECTESTIMATESWASRELATIVELYANDABSOLUTELYSMALL4HE
LITERATUREINWHICHRESEARCHERSEVALUATED332INEXPERIMENTAL FIVE STUDIES WERE OF A NONEDUCATIONALLY SIGNIFICANT SIZE OR
OR QUASI EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES AND PUBLISHED THE RESULTS IN WERE MIXED IN TERMS OF EFFECTS ON OUTCOME ASSESSMENTS
PEER REVIEWEDNATIONALRESEARCHJOURNALS!FTERANEXTENSIVE IE WORD READING VOCABULARY GAINS OR COMPREHENSION
SEARCH THEPANELLOCATEDONLY332STUDIESMEETINGTHESE IMPROVEMENTS.)#(($  
CRITERIA /NLY  OF THE  332 STUDIES IN THE .20 ANALYSIS
INVOLVEDPRIMARY GRADECHILDREN#OLLINS  
!DDRESSCORRESPONDENCETO$2AY2EUTZEL %%*#ENTERFOR%ARLY
4HECONTROLORCOMPARISONGROUPSINTHE332STUD #HILDHOOD %DUCATION 5-#  5TAH 3TATE 5NIVERSITY ,OGAN
IESANALYZEDBYTHE.20VARIEDWIDELY)NSEVERALSTUDIES 54  53!% MAILRAYREUTZEL USUEDU
RESEARCHERSUSEDINTACTCLASSROOMCONTROLGROUPSFROMDIF #OPYRIGHTÚ(ELDREF0UBLICATIONS

 4HE*OURNALOF%DUCATIONAL2ESEARCH

)N CONTRAST +RASHEN  HAS CONTENDED THAT THE !NOTHERCRITICISMOF332RESEARCHBYTHE.20.)#(


.20MISREPRESENTEDORUNDERREPRESENTEDTHERESEARCHLIT ($  FOCUSED ON MANIPULATING OR CONTROLLING THE
ERATURE SUPPORTING 332 (OWEVER A CAREFUL REVIEW OF AMOUNTOFTIMESPENTREADING4HE.20 WASUNABLE
+RASHENSEXPANDEDSETOF332STUDIESREVEALEDTHEINCLU TO ANALYZE THE EFFECT OF TIME SPENT READING ON READING
SIONOFRESEARCHINWHICHCHILDRENNOTONLYREADBOOKSBUT ACHIEVEMENT BECAUSE MANY OF THE PUBLISHED RESEARCHERS
ALSO RECEIVED READING INSTRUCTION USING CHILDRENS BOOKS FAILEDTOEITHERCONTROLORACCOUNTFORTHETOTALAMOUNTOF
4HROUGHTHEEXPANDEDSET HEALSOEXAMINEDSTUDIESINVOLV TIMESPENTREADINGINANDOUTOFSCHOOL4HISALONECOULD
INGHIGHSCHOOLANDCOLLEGESTUDENTSWHOPRESUMABLYCOULD HAVEACCOUNTEDFORTHENONSIGNIFICANTFINDINGSFOR332IN
READANDWOULDSTANDTOPROFITFROMUNGUIDED INDEPENDENT THESTUDIESTHATTHE.20ANALYZED
READINGPRACTICEMORETHANWOULDYOUNGSTUDENTSLEARNING ,AST THE MANIPULATION OF TEXT DIFFICULTY IN PAST 332
TOREAD RESEARCH HAS BEEN SOMEWHAT INCONSISTENT .)#(($
 )NTHEIMPLEMENTATIONOFTRADITIONAL332INCLASS
332!#RITICAL%XAMINATIONOF4EACHER"EHAVIORS ROOMS TEACHERSANDADMINISTRATORSOFTENPLACEDAPREMIUM
ON STUDENTS RIGHT TO CHOOSE THEIR OWN BOOKS FROM THE
#ONCERNSWITHTHEIMPLEMENTATIONOF332ASDESCRIBED CLASSROOM OR SCHOOL LIBRARY HOME OR ANYWHERE ELSE TO
IN THE LITERATURE AND AS IMPLEMENTED IN MANY CLASSROOMS ENSUREHIGHMOTIVATIONTOREAD!LTHOUGHTHISISALAUDABLE
ACROSSTHENATIONINCLUDETHECONSPICUOUSABSENCEOFINTER AIM STUDENTS WERE NOT TAUGHT HOW TO CHOOSE APPROPRI
ACTIONINVOLVINGTHEREADINGOFTEXTSORACCOUNTABILITYFOR ATELY CHALLENGING BOOKS THAT WERE OF INTEREST OR PROVIDED
WHETHER OR NOT STUDENTS READ DURING ALLOCATED 332 TIME NECESSARYSCAFFOLDINGTOCHOOSESUCHBOOKSINTRADITIONALLY
3TAHL NOTEDTHAThMANY332ADVOCATESDONOTALLOW IMPLEMENTED 332 3TAHL AND (EUBACH  ADDRESSED
TEACHERSTOCHECKUPONSTUDENTSORRECOMMENDTHATTEACH THENEEDFORSTUDENTSTOCHOOSEAPPROPRIATELYCHALLENGING
ERSREADTHEIROWNBOOKSDURINGTHISTIMETOBEAMODELOF BOOKSBYSUGGESTINGTHATTHEAPPROPRIATELEVELOFTEXTDIFFI
AREADER/NEFAILINGOF332ISTHATTEACHERSMAYNOT CULTYFORREADINGFLUENCYPRACTICEISINVERSELYRELATEDTOTHE
MONITORTHEIRSTUDENTSREADINGvP  AMOUNTOFSCAFFOLDINGPROVIDEDTOSTUDENTS4HUS THEMORE
"RYAN &AWSON AND 2EUTZEL  DEMONSTRATED THAT SUPPORTATEACHERGIVESTOASTUDENT THELOWERTHEACCURACY
WHEN CLASSROOM TEACHERS MONITORED THEIR STUDENTS DURING LEVELTHATISNEEDEDFORACHILDTOBENEFITFROMREADINGFLU
332 THROUGH BRIEF INTERACTIONS AND ACCOUNTABILITY CON ENCYPRACTICE
FERENCES EVEN THE MOST DISENGAGED STUDENTS IN THE CLASS )NSUMMARY THETRADITIONALIMPLEMENTATIONOF332HAS
REMAINED ON TASK FOR UP TO  WEEKS WITHOUT ADDITIONAL BEENCRITICIZEDFORTHELACKOFTEACHERSTEACHING MONITOR
MONITORING VISITS 4HESE FINDINGS CONCUR WITH PREVIOUS ING INTERACTING WITH AND HOLDING STUDENTS ACCOUNTABLE
RESEARCHOF-ANNINGAND-ANNING ABOUTTHEPOSI FOR THEIR TIME SPENT READING 7EAKNESSES ASSOCIATED WITH
TIVEIMPACTOFSTUDENTDISCUSSIONSANDTEACHERCONFERENCES READINGPRACTICEAPPROACHESSUCHAS332SUGGESTTHATFUTURE
RATHERTHANTEACHERSREADINGSILENTLYDURING3324HE.20 RESEARCHERSSHOULDEXTENDTHEIRSTUDIESOVERLONGERPERIODS
.)#(($  ALSOASSERTEDTHATANIMPORTANTFEATUREOF EMPLOY STRICT EXPERIMENTAL CONTROLS OVER THE AMOUNT OF
EFFECTIVEREADINGFLUENCYPRACTICEWASTHATSTUDENTSRECEIVE TIME SPENT IN READING PRACTICE AT SCHOOL AND HOME MAKE
FEEDBACK ABOUT THEIR READING 4HESE CRITICISMS ILLUSTRATE COMPARISONSWITHKNOWN PROVEN EFFECTIVEREADINGPRACTICE
THAT WITHOUT MONITORING TEACHERS CANNOT BE ASSURED THAT ROUTINES USE MULTIPLE MEASURES OF FLUENCY GROWTH AND
STUDENTSAREINFACTREADINGDURING332TIME EXAMINETHEUSEOFDIFFERINGLEVELSOFTEXTDIFFICULTYTHATARE
USEFULINPROMOTINGREADINGPROGRESS
332!NALYSISOF0REVIOUS2ESEARCH7EAKNESSES
2ESEARCH1UESTION
4HE .20 .)#(($  CRITICIZED PREVIOUS 332
STUDIES FOR THEIR POOR DESCRIPTIONS AND THE QUALITY OF THE )NTHISSTUDY THEPRIMARYRESEARCHQUESTIONWAS)SSCAF
COMPARISON OR CONTROL GROUPS THAT RESEARCHERS USED TO FOLDEDSILENTREADING3C32 ASEFFECTIVEASGUIDEDREPEATED
INVESTIGATETHEEFFICACYOF332h/FTENTHESESTUDIESINTER ORAL READING '2/2 WITH FEEDBACK IN PROMOTING THIRD
PRETEDTHELACKOFDIFFERENCEBETWEEN332ANDTHECONTROL GRADESTUDENTSDEVELOPMENTOFREADINGFLUENCYASMEASURED
CONDITIONASMEANINGTHAT332WASASGOODASSOMEUSU BYA REDUCTIONINERRORRATESB INCREASEINWORDSREAD
ALLY UNSPECIFIED FORM OF READING INSTRUCTION #OMPARING CORRECTLY PER MINUTE C INCREASE IN EXPRESSION RATING
332WITHINSTRUCTIONALROUTINESTHATHAVENOEVIDENCEOF SCORESANDD INCREASEINREADINGCOMPREHENSION ASMEA
SUCCESS OR WHOSE SUCCESS HAS BEEN FOUND TO BE UNRELATED SUREDBYTHEPROPORTIONOFIDEAUNITSRECALLEDFROMREADING
TO ACHIEVEMENT GAINS ,EINHARDT :IGMOND  #OOLEY DIVIDEDBYTHENUMBEROFWORDSREADCORRECTLYPERMINUTE
 ˆIS MEANINGLESSv .)#(($ P   &UTURE 332 !T THIS POINT WE CLARIFY WHAT WE MEAN BY FLUENT READING
RESEARCHERS SHOULD USE CONTROL OR COMPARISON GROUPS THAT /UR DEFINITION OF FLUENCY EXTENDS BEYOND THAT OFFERED BY
IMPLEMENTAFORMOFREADINGFLUENCYPRACTICETHATHASBEEN THE .20 .)#(($  ˆFLUENCY INVOLVES ACCURACY
FOUNDTOBEEFFECTIVEINPRODUCINGREADINGFLUENCYGROWTH RATE AND EXPRESSION ,IKE 3AMUELS  WE OPERATION
TOMAKETHECLAIMOFEQUIVALENTORSUPERIOREFFECTIVENESS ALLY DEFINE FLUENT READING IN THIS STUDY AS SIMULTANEOUS
3EPTEMBER/CTOBER;6OL.O = 

DECODINGANDCOMPREHENSION4HUS THEMEASUREMENTWE ADMINISTERED END OF SECOND GRADE STATE CRITERION REFER
USED MIMICS FLUENT READING BEHAVIORS BY REQUIRING THAT ENCED END OF LEVEL READING TEST SCORES AND THEN DIVIDED
STUDENTS DECODE AND COMPREHEND WHAT THEY ARE ASKED TO THEM INTO THREE ACHIEVEMENT STRATA HIGH MEDIUM AND
READATTHESAMETIME)NOTHERWORDS WEINFORMEDSTUDENTS LOW 7E RANDOMLY ASSIGNED STUDENTS FROM WITHIN THEIR
THATWHENTHEYWEREFINISHEDREADINGTHETESTPASSAGES THEY ACHIEVEMENT STRATAˆHIGH MEDIUM OR LOWˆINTO ONE OF
WOULDALSOBEASKEDTORETELLWHATTHEYREADASAMEASURE THETWOREADINGFLUENCYPRACTICEGROUPSUSINGACOMPUTER
OFCOMPREHENSION GENERATED TABLE OF RANDOM NUMBERS 5SING STRATIFICATION
3C32 IS AN APPROACH TO READING FLUENCY PRACTICE THAT FOR ACCOMPLISHING RANDOM ASSIGNMENT IS A MORE PRECISE
ADDRESSES MANY OF THE WEAKNESSES ASSOCIATED WITH TRADI APPROACH FOR DISTRIBUTING VARIABILITY ESPECIALLY WHEN THE
TIONALLYIMPLEMENTED3323C32MAKESUSEOFSILENT WIDE SCORESUSEDIE READINGACHIEVEMENT DIFFERENTIATEAMONG
READING OF INDEPENDENT LEVEL TEXTS SELECTED FROM VARIED THE STRATA OF STUDENTS ON A CRITERION THAT CORRELATES WITH
GENRESPERIODICTEACHERMONITORINGOFANDINTERACTIONWITH THE CONSTRUCT UNDER EXAMINATION IE READING FLUENCY
INDIVIDUALSTUDENTSANDACCOUNTABILITYTHROUGHCOMPLETED AND COMPREHENSION 3HADISH #OOK  #AMPBELL  
BOOKRESPONSEASSIGNMENTS'2/2ISANAPPROACHTOREAD 7ENOTETHATRANDOMASSIGNMENTOFSTUDENTSTOTREATMENT
INGFLUENCYPRACTICEINWHICHSTUDENTSREPEATEDLYREADALOUD GROUPSOCCURSRARELYINFIELD BASEDEDUCATIONALRESEARCH
INGENERAL nTIMES ASINGLETEXTTYPICALLYATGRADELEVEL 3TRATIFIED RANDOM ASSIGNMENT OF THESE THIRD GRADE STU
OR INSTRUCTIONAL LEVEL WHILE THEY RECEIVE FEEDBACK FROM DENTS TOOK PLACE OVER THE SUMMER MONTHS PRIOR TO THE
A TEACHER OR OTHER STUDENTS '2/2 IS AN ESTABLISHED AND BEGINNINGOFTHETHIRD GRADEYEAR7EDIDNOTINCLUDESTU
SCIENTIFICALLY SUPPORTED READING FLUENCY PRACTICE APPROACH DENTSWHOMOVEDINTOTHEAREADURINGTHESUMMERMONTHS
THATTHE.20.)#(($  HIGHLYRECOMMENDS BECAUSETHEREWERENOPREVIOUSYEARSCRITERION REFERENCED
)NTHISSTUDY ADOMINANTFEATUREWASTHATWEEXAMINED READING TEST SCORES AVAILABLE FOR RANDOMLY ASSIGNING NEW
QUANTITATIVEMEASURESOFTHIRD GRADESTUDENTSFLUENCYAND STUDENTS TO ONE OF THE TWO TREATMENT GROUPS 4HERE WERE
COMPREHENSION GROWTH ! LESS DOMINANT FEATURE WAS THAT TWO3C32CLASSROOMSN ANDTWO'2/2CLASSROOMS
WE FOCUSED ON UNDERSTANDING THE RELATIVE ADVANTAGES AND N $URINGTHESCHOOLYEARINWHICHTHISSTUDYWAS
DISADVANTAGES OF IMPLEMENTING BOTH TYPES OF READING FLU CONDUCTED  OF THE ORIGINAL RANDOMLY ASSIGNED STUDENTS
ENCYPRACTICEIE 3C32AND'2/2 ASINDICATEDBYQUALI .   MOVED FROM THE SCHOOL EITHER DURING THE SUM
TATIVE ANALYSES OF CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS TEACHER WRITTEN MERAFTERRANDOMASSIGNMENTORDURINGTHESTUDY LEAVING
COMMENTS RECORDED IN TEACHER REFLECTION JOURNALS AND TOTALSTUDENTSFORTHEFINALDATACOLLECTIONANDANALYSIS
STUDENTSANSWERSTOSTRUCTUREDINTERVIEWQUESTIONS !TTRITIONWASEQUALINTHE3C32N ANDTHE'2/2
N TREATMENTS
-ETHOD 4HE TWO SCHOOLS IN WHICH THE STUDY WAS CONDUCTED
WERE CONSIDERED HIGH POVERTY LOW PERFORMING SCHOOLS
0ARTICIPANTS
WITHAPPROXIMATELYnDIVERSITY!FRICAN!MERICAN
4HESTUDYINVOLVEDFOURCLASSROOMS THIRD GRADETEACHERS !SIAN AND(ISPANIC WITHMORETHANHALFOFTHESTUDENTS
ANDTHIRD GRADESTUDENTSINTWOELEMENTARYSCHOOLS!LL IN THE SCHOOLS QUALIFYING FOR FREE OR REDUCED LUNCH 4HE
TEACHERSINTHESTUDYROTATEDTHROUGHTEACHINGTHE3C32AND SCHOOLSHADPARTICIPATEDFORTHEFULLYEARSOFTHEFEDERALLY
'2/2TREATMENTSDURINGTHEYEAROFTHISSTUDY%ACHTEACHER FUNDED2EADING%XCELLENCE!CT2%! GRANTPROGRAMTHAT
ROTATEDEVERYWEEKS TEACHINGTHE3C32AND'2/2TREAT TARGETED READING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUC
MENTSTWICEDURINGTHEYEAR ASSHOWNIN4ABLE TIONAL MATERIALS FUNDING FOR 'RADES +n IN HIGH POVERTY
!LLTHIRD GRADESTUDENTSWERERANDOMLYASSIGNEDTOONE LOW PERFORMINGELEMENTARYSCHOOLS
OFTWOTREATMENTGROUPSIE 3C32OR'2/2 INTHETWO 4HE  THIRD GRADE TEACHERS IN THIS STUDY ALSO HAD PAR
SCHOOLS4ORANDOMLYASSIGNSTUDENTS WELISTEDTHEIRSPRING TICIPATED IN THE 2%! SUBGRANT FOR  YEARS 4HEY RECEIVED

4!",%4REATMENT2OTATION BY 7EEK0ERIODS

4REATMENT STWEEKS NDWEEKS RDWEEKS THWEEKS

3CHOOL
3C32CLASSROOM 4 4 4 4
'2/2CLASSROOM 4 4 4 4
3CHOOL
3C32CLASSROOM 4 4 4 4
'2/2CLASSROOM 4 4 4 4

.OTE'2/2GUIDEDREPEATEDORALREADING3C32SCAFFOLDEDSILENTREADING
 4HE*OURNALOF%DUCATIONAL2ESEARCH

CLASSROOM BASEDCOACHINGONATLEASTAWEEKLYBASISFROMA AS INCORRECT !T THE END OF  MIN A SLASH WAS PLACED AT
SCHOOL BASED READING MENTOR OR LITERACY COACH AND WEEKLY THE POINT WHERE THE STUDENT SAID THE LAST WORD 4HE TEST
FOLLOW UPSTUDYINGRADE LEVELSTUDYGROUPS$URINGTHEND ADMINISTRATOR RECORDED EACH STUDENTS READING OF THE FOUR
ANDRDYEARSOFTHE2%!PROJECT THEDISTRICTS2%!TECH PASSAGESONASEPARATEAUDIOTAPETOBEUSEDLATERFORSCORING
NICAL ASSISTANT A UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR IN EARLY LITERACY GAVE PURPOSES7EDETERMINEDSTUDENTSREADINGACCURACYSCORES
TEACHERSMONTHLYPROFESSIONALDEVELOPMENTWORKSHOPSAND ONTHE$)"%,3PASSAGESUSEDINTHISSTUDYBYCOUNTINGTHE
IN CLASS READING INSTRUCTION AND PRACTICE DEMONSTRATIONS TOTALNUMBEROFREADINGERRORSASDESCRIBEDFOREACH MIN
2EADINGCOACHESCONDUCTEDWEEKLYSTUDYGROUPSFORnHR READINGOFTHEFOURPASSAGES
ON SCIENTIFICALLY BASED READING RESEARCH FOR WHICH TEACHERS 2EADINGRATE2EADINGRATEWASCALCULATEDUSINGAWORDS
READANDSTUDIEDINTENSIVELYABOUTEFFECTIVEREADINGINSTRUC CORRECTPERMINUTEWCPM METRIC4HEWCPMMETRICCOR
TIONANDPRACTICEASOUTLINEDIN0REVENTING2EADING$IFFICULTIES RECTS FOR THE NUMBER OF ERRORS COMMITTED IN EACH  MIN
IN9OUNG#HILDREN3NOW "URNS 'RIFFIN  $URINGTHE READING SAMPLE 7E CALCULATED THE WCPM METRIC BY SUB
SUMMERPRECEDINGTHESTUDY THETHIRD GRADETEACHERSWERE TRACTINGTHETOTALNUMBEROFERRORSFROMTHETOTALNUMBER
PAIDANADDITIONALSTIPENDTOREADANDDISCUSSWITHTHEIRLITER OFWORDSREADBYEACHSTUDENTINMINFOREACHOFTHEFOUR
ACYCOACHESINFORMATIONABOUTTHETWODIFFERENTAPPROACHES PASSAGES
TOBEUSEDINTHISSTUDYANDJOINTLYPLANTHEIRLESSONSFORBOTH 2EADINGEXPRESSION2EADINGEXPRESSIONWASJUDGEDUSING
TREATMENTS4HESETHIRD GRADETEACHERSRECEIVEDDAYSOF THE-ULTIDIMENSIONAL&LUENCY3CALE-&3:UTELL2ASIN
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ON EFFECTIVE FLUENCY INSTRUCTION SKI  COMPOSEDOF FOUR POINTRATINGSUBSCALESVOL
ANDPRACTICEUSINGTRAININGMATERIALSDRAWNFROMAVARIETYOF UME PHRASING SMOOTHNESS ANDPACE:UTELLAND2ASINSKI
PROFESSIONALSOURCES WHICHWEREBASEDMAINLYON/PITZAND REPORTEDAINTERRATERRELIABILITYCOEFFICIENTFORTHE-&3
2ASINSKIS  'OOD BYE 2OUND 2OBIN  %FFECTIVE /RAL ,ITERACY COACHES WERE TRAINED TO SCORE AUDIOTAPES DURING
2EADING3TRATEGIES4HUS THETHIRD GRADETEACHERSSELECTED THESTUDYUSINGASETOFFOURSAMPLESFROMTHEPREASSESSMENT
FORTHISSTUDYWEREPERHAPSBETTERPREPAREDINEFFECTIVEVARIA PASSAGES ! MEMBER OF THE RESEARCH TEAM GAVE FEEDBACK
TIONSONFLUENCYPRACTICETHANMOSTCLASSROOMTEACHERSWERE TO THESE LITERACY COACHES ON HOW TO USE THE RATING SCALE
IN THE FIRST YEARS OF THE ST CENTURY BUT THEY DID NOT FEEL FOLLOWING THE PROCESSES DESCRIBED BY :UTELL AND 2ASINSKI
ASIFTHEYWEREEXPERTSINPROVIDINGFLUENCYINSTRUCTIONAND "ECAUSE PASSAGES WERE AUDIOTAPED LITERACY COACHES COULD
PRACTICEASTHESTUDYBEGAN LISTENTOSTUDENTSREADINGSAMPLESMULTIPLETIMESIFNECES
SARYTODETERMINEARATING4OTALSCORESONTHE-&3RANGED
-EASURES FROMTOPOINTS3TUDENTSCORESWEREAVERAGEDBYTAK
INGTHERATINGOFEACHOFTHEFOURITEMSˆVOLUME PHRASING
7EUSEDTWOSEPARATEPRETESTANDTWOSEPARATEPOSTTEST SMOOTHNESS ANDPACEˆANDDIVIDINGTHESUMOFTHERATINGS
PASSAGESATOTALOFFOURPASSAGES FROMTHETHIRD GRADELEVEL BY3TUDENTMEANSCORESWEREUSEDINTHEANALYSIS
$YNAMIC)NDICATORSOF"ASIC%ARLY,ITERACY3KILLS$)"%,3 #OMPREHENSION ORAL RETELLINGS 3TUDENT ORAL RETELLINGS OF
/RAL2EADING&LUENCY/2& TESTˆ0OTSAND4HE&IELD4RIP THEPASSAGESWEREUSEDASTHEMEASUREOFSTUDENTCOMPRE
PRETESTPASSAGES -Y0ARENTSAND0LANTINGA'ARDENPOST HENSION /RAL RETELLINGS ARE USED AS A STANDARD PROCEDURE
TESTPASSAGES ˆTOASSESSSTUDENTSFLUENCYANDCOMPREHEN IN MANY COMPREHENSION RESEARCH STUDIES AND IN A VARIETY
SION GROWTH OVER THE YEARLONG STUDY 'OOD  +AMINSKI OF INFORMAL AND FORMAL PUBLISHED ASSESSMENTS 0ARIS 
 !TTHETIMEOFTHISSTUDY THE$)"%,3/2&TESTWAS 3TAHL   /UR APPROACH TO SCORING THE ORAL RETELLINGS
JUSTBEGINNINGTOBEUSEDASAMEASUREOFSTUDENTSREADING WAS MODELED AFTER THE $EVELOPMENTAL 2EADING !SSESSMENT
FLUENCY IN THESE SCHOOLS (OWEVER IN YEARS SUBSEQUENT "EAVER  7EPRODUCEDATEMPLATETEXT BASESCORING
TO THIS STUDY THE $)"%,3 /2& HAS BECOME A UBIQUITOUS PROTOCOLFOREACHPASSAGEBYPARSINGTHEPASSAGESINTOIDEA
FEATURE OF FLUENCY ASSESSMENT IN MANY ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS UNITS NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT CLAUSES OR MEANING UNITS 
ACROSSTHENATION7ESELECTEDTHE/2&TESTANDPASSAGES .EXT MEMBERS OF THE RESEARCH TEAM RANKED ORDERED IDEA
FORTWOREASONS&IRST THISWASATESTTHATWASBEINGUSEDIN UNITSINTOTWOMAJORCATEGORIESA SUPERORDINATEORMAIN
THESEANDMANYOTHERELEMENTARYSCHOOLSACROSSTHENATION IDEAUNITSINTHEPASSAGEANDB SUBORDINATEORDETAILIDEA
TO ASSESS FLUENCY 3ECOND THE /2& TEST HAS BEEN DEMON UNITSINTHEPASSAGE4HEN WEPRINTEDTHETEMPLATETEXT
STRATED TO HAVE TECHNICAL ADEQUACY IN PREDICTIVE VALIDITY BASEORALRETELLINGSCORINGPROTOCOL LISTINGTHEIDEAUNITSIN
AND RELIABILITY FOR MEASURING STUDENTS FLUENCY 'OOD  ANORDERINDICATINGTHEIRRELATIVEIMPORTANCEMAINIDEAOR
+AMINSKI 4HESCHOOL BASEDLITERACYCOACHESWERETRAINED DETAIL WITHABLANKBYEACHFORPLACINGACHECKMARK
TO SCORE THE FOUR TEST PASSAGES USING THE STANDARDIZED !FTERSTUDENTSFINISHEDTHE MINREADINGSOFEACHPAS
APPROACHFORADMINISTRATIONOFTHE/2&TEST SAGE THETESTADMINISTRATORASKEDTHEMTOORALLYRETELLWHAT
$ECODING ACCURACY ASSESSMENT 3LASHES WERE PLACED OVER THEYHADREAD#HILDRENWEREINSTRUCTEDTOTELLhEVERYTHING
INCORRECTLYREADWORDS INCLUDINGHESITATIONSAFTERS THE YOUCANREMEMBERFROMREADINGTHEPASSAGEv!SSTUDENTS
TEST ADMINISTRATOR GAVE THE WORD TO THE STUDENT MISPRO MADE MENTION OF MAIN OR DETAIL IDEA UNITS IN THEIR ORAL
NUNCIATIONS AND OMISSIONS IN THE  THIRD GRADE $)"%,3 RETELLINGS THE TEST ADMINISTRATOR MADE A CHECK MARK IN
PASSAGES )NSERTIONS AND SELF CORRECTIONS WERE NOT SCORED THEBOXBYTHEMAIN ORDETAIL IDEAUNITDISPLAYEDONTHE
3EPTEMBER/CTOBER;6OL.O = 

SCORINGPROTOCOL4HETESTADMINISTRATORSUMMEDTHETOTAL WITHANOPENRESPONSEAREA A 7HATDIFFICULTIESAREYOU


NUMBEROFMAIN ANDDETAIL IDEAUNITSRECALLEDATTHEBOT ENCOUNTERING WITH THE TWO FLUENCY PRACTICE TREATMENTS
TOMOFTHETEMPLATE3TUDENTSRECEIVEDANEXTRAPOINTFOR B 7HAT IS GOING WELL FOR YOU WITH THE FLUENCY PRACTICE
RETELLING THE INFORMATION IN THE PASSAGES IN THE CORRECT TREATMENTSANDC 7HATEFFECTS IFANY AREYOUNOTICING
SEQUENCE ONYOURSTUDENTSWITHEACHFLUENCYPRACTICETREATMENT4HE
4OESTABLISHRELIABILITYOFTHECOMPREHENSIONORALRETELL SECONDSECTIONOFTHE42*REQUESTEDAWRITTENSUMMARYFOR
ING SCORING PROCESS TWO MEMBERS OF THE RESEARCH TEAM SHARINGOVERALLIMPRESSIONSANDTEACHERCONCLUSIONSABOUT
INDEPENDENTLYSCOREDRANDOMLYSELECTEDSTUDENTAUDIO THESTUDY
TAPES OF THE ORAL RETELLINGS USING THE TEMPLATE TEXT BASE 3TUDENTINTERVIEWQUESTIONS!TTHEOUTSETANDCONCLUSION
ORAL RETELLING PROTOCOL 4HE  TOTAL ORAL RETELLING SCORES OFTHEEXPERIMENT STUDENTSWEREASKEDTOANSWERTHEFOL
FOR EACH OF THE TWO RATERS WERE ANALYZED USING CORRELA LOWINGQUESTIONSA (OWDOYOUTHINKYOURREADINGALOUD
TIONANALYSISYIELDINGA0EARSONSRCORRELATIONCOEFFICIENT SOUNDS B )F YOU DONT THINK YOUR READING ALOUD SOUNDS
4HE OBTAINED R WAS  INDICATING A HIGH PERCENTAGE OF GOOD WHATWILLYOUDOTOFIXITANDC 7HATDOESAGOOD
AGREEMENT  WHICH WAS DETERMINED BY SQUARING THE READERSOUNDLIKETOYOU
OBTAINED
4OCORRECTFORTHEPOTENTIALLIMITINGEFFECTOFTHENUMBER $ESIGN
OFWORDSREADCORRECTLYINMINONEACHSTUDENTSREADING
COMPREHENSIONORALRETELLINGSCORES WEUSEDAPROPORTIONAL )N THIS RESEARCH STUDY WE USED A DOMINANT LESS DOMI
SCOREINTHEANALYSIS4HISSCOREWASDERIVEDBYDIVIDINGTHE NANTMIXEDMODELDESIGN USINGQUANTITATIVEANDQUALITA
NUMBEROFIDEAUNITSINEACHSTUDENTSORALRETELLINGBYTHE TIVEDATACOLLECTION4ASHAKKORI4EDDLIE  )NTHE
NUMBEROFWORDSREADCORRECTLYINMINONTHATSAMEPAS DOMINANT STRUCTURE OF THE MIXED MODEL DESIGN WE USED
SAGE&OREXAMPLE IFASTUDENTRECALLEDSIXIDEAUNITSINHIS A PRETESTnPOSTTEST TRUE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN #AMPBELL
ORHERORALRETELLINGANDREADWCPM THEPROPORTIONAL  3TANLEY   )N THE LESS DOMINANT STRUCTURE OF THE
SCORE WAS  (OWEVER IF A STUDENT RECALLED  IDEA UNITS MIXED MODEL DESIGN WE ANALYZED CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS
INWCPM THEPROPORTIONALSCOREWASTHESAME7EDID 42*S AND DISCUSSIONS AND STUDENT INTERVIEW QUESTIONS TO
THISSOTHATTHECOMPREHENSIONSCORESREFLECTEDTHEAMOUNT DESCRIBE TEACHING LEARNING AND CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
OFRECALLEDIDEAUNITSATTENUATEDBYTHEPROPORTIONOFTHE PRACTICES IN EACH EXPERIMENTAL TREATMENT 7E ACKNOWL
NUMBEROFWORDSREADCORRECTLY EDGEONEIMPORTANTLIMITATIONOFTHERESEARCHDESIGNUSED
#LASSROOM OBSERVATIONS OF TEACHERS AND STUDENTS 4HE INTHISSTUDY4HEREWASNOTRADITIONALCONTROLGROUPTHAT
SCHOOL BASED LITERACY COACH OBSERVED EACH TEACHERS FLU CONTINUED THE REGULAR READING INSTRUCTION TIME WITHOUT
ENCYINSTRUCTIONWEEKLYFORTHEFULLLENGTHOFTHEPRACTICE THE BENEFIT OF EITHER OF THE TWO READING FLUENCY PRACTICE
SESSIONMIN USINGAFIVE ITEMOBSERVATIONRATINGSCALE TREATMENTS 3C32 OR '2/2 ! TRUE CONTROL GROUP OF NO
2ESEARCH TEAM MEMBERS AND THE SCHOOL READING COACHES TREATMENTISDIFFICULTTOIMPLEMENTWITHINTHEECOLOGICALLY
RECORDED FIELD NOTES AND RATINGS USING OBSERVATION FORMS VALIDCONTEXTOFASCHOOLSETTING4HETEACHERSWHOPARTICI
CREATED FOR BOTH OF THE READING FLUENCY PRACTICE ROUTINES PATEDINTHISRESEARCHDIDSOBELIEVINGTHEYWOULDBEDOING
/N TWO OCCASIONS A PANEL OF THREE OBSERVERS WENT INTO SOMETHINGHELPFULTOTHEIRSTUDENTSRATHERTHANDOINGMORE
CLASSROOMS TO ASSESS THE INTERRATER RELIABILITY AMONG THE OFTHENORM4HENORMWASNOTASUFFICIENTENTICEMENTFOR
OBSERVERS /N A MONTHLY BASIS THE RESEARCH TEAM ALONG TEACHERS TO PARTICIPATE 'IVEN THIS LIMITATION WE DECIDED
WITHTHESCHOOL DISTRICTLANGUAGEARTSCOORDINATOROBSERVED TO ANALYZE THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY USING GAIN SCORES FROM
EACH TEACHER USING THE SAME OBSERVATION SCALE TO ASSURE PRETEST TO POSTTEST FOR THE TWO TREATMENT GROUPS TO DETER
FIDELITYTOTHEEXPERIMENTALTREATMENTSANDPROBLEMSOLVE MINEIFSTUDENTSINTHETWOTREATMENTGROUPSMADEPROGRESS
IMPLEMENTATIONISSUESWITHTHETEACHERS INFLUENCYANDCOMPREHENSIONDURINGTHEYEAR
/BSERVATIONSREVEALEDHIGHDEGREESOFFIDELITYINTHETWO
TREATMENTS )N GENERAL PROBLEMS WERE OF A MINOR NATURE 2EGULAR2EADING)NSTRUCTION
AND SOLVED BY SUPPLYING ON THE SPOT TRAINING OR ACCESS TO
ADDITIONALREQUESTEDPRACTICEMATERIALSWHENNECESSARY! 4HEREADINGINSTRUCTIONINALL+nCLASSROOMSWASAPRE
RANDOMSAMPLEOFFOURMONTHLYRATINGSUSINGTHEFIVE ITEM SCRIBED  MIN TIME BLOCK EACH DAY WITH A CLEAR INSTRUC
OBSERVATION SCALES COMPLETED BY THE DISTRICT LANGUAGE ARTS TIONAL ROUTINE 3TUDENTS RECEIVED GUIDED READING INSTRUC
COORDINATOR AND A MEMBER OF THE RESEARCH TEAM REVEALED TIONINSMALLGROUPSFORMINPERDAYPERTHEPROCEDURES
AGREEMENTONTHEFOURRANDOMLYSAMPLEDINDEPENDENT DESCRIBEDINTHEBOOK'UIDED2EADING'OOD&IRST4EACHINGFOR
RATINGSOFTREATMENTQUALITYANDFIDELITY !LL#HILDRENBY&OUNTASAND0INNELL #HILDRENROTATED
4EACHER RESPONSE JOURNALS )NDIVIDUAL COPIES OF A TEACHER DAILY THROUGH LEARNING STATIONS EVERY  MIN THAT FOCUSED
RESPONSE JOURNAL 42* WERE CREATED FOR EACH OF THE  ON VOCABULARY COMPREHENSION STRATEGIES AND WORD WORK
THIRD GRADETEACHERS4HEFIRSTSECTIONOFTHE42*CONTAINED IN ADDITION TO THE  MIN THEY SPENT WITH THEIR CLASSROOM
WEEKLY RESPONSEPAGESTHATREQUIREDANSWERSTOTHREE TEACHER IN SMALL GROUP GUIDED READING LESSONS $URING THE
WRITTEN QUESTIONS WITH SPACE FOR EACH RESPONSE ALONG REMAININGMINOFTHEDAY CHILDRENRECEIVEDWHOLE GROUP
 4HE*OURNALOF%DUCATIONAL2ESEARCH

WORDWORKINSTRUCTIONFORMINBASEDON0-#UNNING )NTHESECTIONSTHATFOLLOW WEDESCRIBETHENATUREOFTHE


HAMS  WORD BUILDING ACTIVITIES 4HE REMAINING  TWO FLUENCY TREATMENTS AND EMPHASIZE HOW THE MODES OF
MINOFREADINGINSTRUCTIONEACHDAYFOCUSEDONWHOLE GROUP PRACTICEDIFFERED
VOCABULARY AND COMPREHENSION STRATEGY INSTRUCTION LESSONS
THATWEREPRESCRIBEDBYADISTRICTCURRICULUMGUIDE 3CAFFOLDED3ILENT2EADING4REATMENT

&LUENCY0RACTICE4REATMENTS 4HE  TEACHERS WHO ROTATED THROUGH THE 3C32 FLUENCY


TREATMENT GROUPS HAD BEEN TRAINED IN USING &OUNTAS AND
3IMILARITIES4HEREWERETHREESIMILARITIESBETWEENTHETWO 0INNELLS  !n: TEXT GRADIENT OR LEVELING SCHEME
TREATMENTS 4EACHERS IN THE 3C32 AND '2/2 TREATMENTS FOR DETERMINING DIFFICULTY LEVELS OF READING TEXTS %ACH
PROVIDED EQUAL LENGTHS OF FLUENCY PRACTICE TIME AND EQUAL TEACHER HAD A LARGE AND WELL STOCKED CLASSROOM LIBRARY OF
LENGTHS OF CORE READING INSTRUCTION TIME FOR ALL FOUR CLASS BOOKSRESULTINGFROMTHEIR YEARPARTICIPATIONINTHE2%!
ROOMSINTHESTUDY4EACHERSINALLFOURCLASSROOMSALSOUSED GRANT ,IBRARIES IN THESE CLASSROOMS WERE ARRANGED SO THAT
THE SAME INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS AND PROCEDURES !LSO ALL EVERYBOOKINTHECLASSROOMLIBRARYWASEITHERMARKEDWITH
FOURCLASSROOMSUSEDATAKE HOMEREADINGLIBRARYFROMWHICH COLOREDTAPEORPLACEDINTOACOLOREDPLASTICBININDICATING
STUDENTSWEREEXPECTEDTOTAKEHOMEDAILYANINDEPENDENT LEVELOFDIFFICULTY&URTHERMORE TEACHERSHADBEENTRAINED
LEVELBOOKFORPERSONALREADING4EACHERSTRACKEDALLSTUDENTS TOPRESENTLESSONSTOSTUDENTSEARLYINTHEYEARANDTHROUGH
WEEKLY TO ASSURE THEY WERE READING  MIN PER DAY OUT OF OUT THE YEAR IN THE 3C32 TREATMENT ON HOW TO SELF SELECT
SCHOOL AS REPORTED BY THE STUDENTS PARENTS 3ECOND EVERY EASY INDEPENDENT LEVELBOOKSFOR READING USING RESOURCES
DAY THETEACHERSINBOTHFLUENCYPRACTICETREATMENTSBEGAN FOUNDIN9OUR#LASSROOM,IBRARY.EW7AYSTO'IVEIT-ORE
THEALLOCATEDFLUENCYPRACTICETIMEBYMODELINGFLUENTREAD 4EACHING0OWER2EUTZEL&AWSON  
INGOFATEXTANDDISCUSSINGWITHSTUDENTS ALTHOUGHBRIEFLY 4HEDAILY3C32TREATMENTBEGANWITHTEACHERSMODELING
ABOUT  MIN VARIOUS CHARACTERISTICS OF FLUENT READING THEFLUENTREADINGOFATEXT!FTERWARD THETEACHERSCON
,AST THE TEACHER OR ANOTHER THIRD GRADE STUDENT PROVIDED DUCTED A BRIEF DISCUSSION WITH STUDENTS ABOUT WHAT MADE
FEEDBACKANDMONITOREDSTUDENTSINBOTHTREATMENTGROUPS THEIRMODELEDREADINGFLUENT)NGENERAL THESEDISCUSSIONS
DURINGTHEIRFLUENCYREADINGPRACTICETIME FOCUSED ON THE FLUENCY ELEMENTS OF hREADING WHAT WAS ON
$IFFERENCES 4HE TWO TREATMENTS IN THIS STUDY WERE DIF THEPAGE vhSOUNDINGLIKESOMEONETALKING vORhREADINGTOO
FERENTIATED BY SIX CONTRASTING CHARACTERISTICS A MODE OF FAST TOOSLOW ORJUSTRIGHTv7HENTHIS MINMODELINGAND
READING SILENT VS ORAL B NATURE OF READING WIDE VS DISCUSSIONENDED THETEACHERREMINDEDSTUDENTSTHATTHEY
REPEATED C FREQUENCYOFFEEDBACKANDMONITORINGDAILY SHOULDSELECTANINDEPENDENT LEVELBOOKFROMANAPPROPRI
VSWEEKLY D SOCIALNATUREOFREADINGISOLATEDVSCOLLAB ATELYCOLOREDBINORSHELFINTHECLASSROOMLIBRARYANDTHAT
ORATIVE E TEACHER ASSIGNEDTEXTSVERSUSSTUDENT SELECTED THEYSHOULDALSOSELECTFROMONEOFTHEGENRESSHOWNONTHE
TEXTSFROMLEVELEDCLASSROOMLIBRARIES ANDF LEVELOFTEXT THEIRGENREWHEELTOREADSILENTLY3TUDENTSWEREREQUIREDTO
DIFFICULTYGRADE VSINDEPENDENT LEVELTEXTS  READACROSSSIXDIFFERENTGENRETYPESEACHWEEKS ASSHOWN
4HE3C32TREATMENTSTUDENTSREADTEXTSSILENTLY WHERE IN&IGURE
AS THE '2/2 TREATMENT STUDENTS READ TEXTS ORALLY 4HE 7HENSTUDENTSFINISHEDONEBOOKFROMEACHGENREREPRE
3C32 TREATMENT STUDENTS READ WIDELY FROM A VARIETY OF SENTEDONTHEWHEEL THEYCOLOREDINTHATSLICEOFTHEWHEEL
TEXT GENRES USING A GENRE WHEEL EACH FOR  WEEK PERIOD ANDSELECTEDANOTHERBOOKFROMADIFFERENTGENREONTHEWHEEL
4HE'2/2TREATMENTSTUDENTSREADTEACHER ASSIGNEDTEXTS 7HENTHEQUARTERENDED EACHCHILDSHOULDHAVECOMPLETED
REPEATEDLY BETWEEN THREE AND FIVE TIMES )N THE 3C32 ANDCOLOREDHALFOFTHESLICESONTHEIRGENREWHEEL
TREATMENT THE TEACHER PROVIDED FEEDBACK AND MONITORED 5NLIKE IN FORMER CLASSROOM MANIFESTATIONS OF 332
STUDENTS AT LEAST WEEKLY )N THE '2/2 TREATMENT EITHER TEACHERSKEPTALISTINGOFSTUDENTNAMESWITHWHOMTHEY
ATEACHERORAPEERPROVIDEDFEEDBACKANDMONITOREDSTU HAD CONDUCTED BRIEF READING CONFERENCES $URING THESE
DENTSDAILY)NTHE3C32TREATMENT STUDENTSREADTEXTSIN BRIEF READING CONFERENCES THE TEACHER ASKED STUDENTS TO
ISOLATION )N THE '2/2 TREATMENT STUDENTS READ EITHER READPARTOFTHEBOOKALOUD CONDUCTEDABRIEFDISCUSSION
CHORALLYWITHTHEWHOLECLASSORWITHASELF SELECTEDBUDDY ABOUT THE READING AND ASKED THE CHILD TO SET GOALS FOR
ORPEERINPAIREDREADING3TUDENTSINTHE3C32TREATMENT FINISHINGTHEBOOKWITHINAREASONABLETIMEFRAME4HESE
SELF SELECTEDTHEIRTEXTS3TUDENTSINTHE'2/2TREATMENT RANDOMMONITORINGCONFERENCESTOOKABOUTnMINEACH
PRACTICEDREADINGTEXTSTHATWERESELECTEDBYTHETEACHER SOTHATTHETEACHERWASABLETOCONFERENCEWITHBETWEEN
,AST STUDENTS IN THE 3C32 TREATMENT PRACTICED FLUENCY ANDSTUDENTSEACHDAY
BYREADINGTEXTSATTHEIRINDEPENDENTREADINGLEVELSFROM
AMONG SEVERAL GENRES STORED IN LEVELED CONTAINERS IN THE '2/27ITH&EEDBACK4REATMENT
CLASSROOM LIBRARIES 3TUDENTS IN THE '2/2 TREATMENT
PRACTICED FLUENCY WITH GRADE LEVEL TEXTS &IGURE  HIGH 4HETEACHERSWHOALSOROTATEDTHROUGHTHE'2/2TREAT
LIGHTSSIMILARITIESANDDIFFERENCESBETWEENTHETWOFLUENCY MENTGROUPSHADBEENTRAINEDINUSINGAVARIETYOFMETHODS
PRACTICETREATMENTS FORHELPINGSTUDENTSTOREPEATEDLYREADTEXTSALOUDTODEVELOP
3EPTEMBER/CTOBER;6OL.O = 

4REATMENTCHARACTERISTIC 'UIDED2EPEATED/RAL2EADING'2/2 3CAFFOLDED3ILENT2EADING3C32


4IMEALLOCATED MINDAILY -ONDAYn4HURSDAY MINDAILY -ONDAYn4HURSDAY
0URPOSE 4OINCREASESTUDENTSmUENCYANDCOMPREHENSION 4OINCREASESTUDENTSmUENCYANDCOMPRE
HENSION
4HEORETICALEMPHASIS 7ORDLEVELAUTOMATICITYLEADSTOINCREASEDCOMPREHENSION %XPERIENCEWITHDIFFERINGTEXTGENRES
STRUCTURES ANDKNOWLEDGEDOMAINSLEADS
TOINCREASEDCOMPREHENSION
-ODEOFREADINGPRACTICE /RALREADING 3ILENTREADING
&OCUSOFPRACTICE 2EPEATEDREADINGSOFSHORTTEXTSEGMENTSTOFACILITATE 7IDEREADINGOFBOOK LENGTHTEXTSACROSS
AUTOMATICWORDRECOGNITION DIFFERINGGENRESTOINCREASEKNOWLEDGE
ACQUISITIONANDEXPERIENCEWITHTEXT
ORGANIZATION
,EVELOFTEXTDIFlCULTY 'ROUPGRADE LEVELTEXT )NDIVIDUALINDEPENDENT LEVELTEXTS
PRACTICED
2OLEOFTEACHERDURING -ONITORANDPROVIDEFEEDBACKTOSTUDENTS -ONITORANDPROVIDEFEEDBACKTOSTUDENTS
PRACTICE
4EACHERINSTRUCTION %XPLAINANDMODELmUENTREADING %XPLAINANDMODELmUENTREADING
.ATUREOFTEACHER PEER 3TUDENTREADSALOUDANDINFORMATIONCONVEYEDABOUT 3TUDENTREADSALOUDWITHBRIEFINTERACTIONS
FEEDBACK ANDGUIDANCE ACCURACY RATE ANDEXPRESSIONBYTEACHERORPEER WITHTHETEACHERAROUNDmUENCYANDTEXT
UNDERSTANDING GOALSETTING ANDTIMELINE
FORCOMPLETION
&OCUSOFTEACHER PEER &LUENCY &LUENCYANDCOMPREHENSION
FEEDBACK ANDGUIDANCE
3OCIALCONTEXT 0EERCOLLABORATIONINLISTENINGTO PRACTICINGWITH AND ,IMITEDINTERACTIONWITHOTHERPEERS
PROVIDINGFEEDBACKTOOTHERSTUDENTSSTUDENTPERFOR LARGELYINDIVIDUALINASOLITARYSETTING
MANCESONCEMONTHLY
#HARACTERISTICSOFREAD 4EACHERCHOICE 3TUDENTCHOICEWITHINSTRUCTUREINDEPEN
INGMOTIVATIONAND DENTLEVEL
ENGAGEMENT

&)'52%4HEORETICALANDPRACTICALANALYSISOFTHETWOFLUENCYPRACTICETREATMENTS3HADEDBOXESHIGHLIGHTCONTRASTS

FLUENCY4HESEMETHODSINCLUDEDA VARIOUSTYPESOFCHORAL
READINGFORWHOLE GROUPPRACTICEINCLUDINGUNISON ANTIPHO
&ANTASY &OLKTALES NAL ANDECHOICB PAIRED ASSISTED BUDDY ORDYADREADING
WITH A STUDENT SELECTED PARTNER AND C READERS THEATER
RADIO READING AND RECITATION 4EACHERS SELECTED GRADE LEVEL
0OETRY &ABLES
TEXTSTHATWEREREPEATEDLYREADALOUDATLEASTnDIFFERENT
TIMES
4HE DAILY '2/2 TREATMENT BEGAN WITH THE TEACHERS
!UTOBIOGRAPHY !DVENTURE MODELING THE FLUENT READING OF THE SELECTED GRADE LEVEL
TEXT 4HEN THE TEACHERS CONDUCTED BRIEF DISCUSSIONS WITH
(ISTORICALlCTION 3CIENCElCTION STUDENTS ABOUT WHAT MADE THEIR MODELED READING FLUENT
4HESEDISCUSSIONSTYPICALLYFOCUSEDONTHEFLUENCYELEMENTS
OFhREADINGWHATWASONTHEPAGE vhSOUNDINGLIKESOMEONE
TALKING vORhREADINGTOOFAST TOOSLOW ORJUSTRIGHTv7HEN
"IOGRAPHY (UMOR THIS  MIN MODELING AND DISCUSSION ENDED STUDENTS READ
THEGRADE LEVEL TEACHER SELECTEDTEXTASAWHOLECLASSWITH
-YSTERY 3PORTS THE TEACHER USING SOME FORM OF CHORAL READING SUCH AS
UNISON ECHOIC OR ANTIPHONAL READINGS !FTER THE WHOLE
GROUP CHORAL READING PRACTICE CONCLUDED STUDENTS REREAD
&)'52%2EADINGGENREWHEEL$22EUTZEL ALOUD THE ASSIGNED GRADE LEVEL TEXT WITH ANOTHER STUDENT
0#&AWSON   WHOMTHEYSELECTEDASABUDDYFORPAIREDREADING BECAUSE
THISAPPROACHTOPAIRINGSTUDENTSHASSHOWNPOSITIVERESULTS
 4HE*OURNALOF%DUCATIONAL2ESEARCH

INTHEPAST-EISINGER 3CHWANENFLUGEL "RADLEY +UHN  FOR GAIN SCORES BETWEEN THE 3C32 AND '2/2 TREATMENT
3TAHL   GROUPS ON ACCURACY RATE EXPRESSION AND COMPREHENSION
/N OCCASION STUDENTS PRACTICED READING THE TEXT ALOUD ONTWO$)"%,3/2&THIRD GRADEPASSAGES7EUSED3033
BYREADINGINTOAFLUENCYPHONECONSTRUCTEDOFWHITE  IN FOR7INDOWSWITHINTHEGENERALLINEARMODEL',-
POLYVINYLCHLORIDE06# PIPEAND06# PIPEELBOWS4HE FORTHEANALYSES4HEPARTICIPANTSWEREENTEREDASTHEUNIT
BOTTOMPARTOFTHE06#FLUENCYPHONESWIVELEDOUTFORTHE OF ANALYSIS BECAUSE NO 4REATMENT ¾ 4EACHER INTERACTION
READERTOREADINTO4HEEARPIECEWASPLACEDONTHEEAROF FOR ANY OF THE MEASURES OCCURRED WHEN TESTED IN A NESTED
THELISTENERDURINGPAIREDREADINGTOHEARTHEBUDDYSREAD !./6! AS POTENTIAL TEACHER EFFECTS WERE CONTROLLED BY
INGTHROUGHTHEFLUENCYPHONE/NETIMEPERMONTH THE DESIGN
TEACHERSELECTEDATEXTTHATWASTOBEPRACTICEDBYSTUDENTS 1UALITATIVE OBSERVATIONAL DATA WERE ANALYZED TO ASSESS
FORWEEKINANTICIPATIONOFAPERFORMANCEUSINGREADERS THEDEGREETOWHICHTHETWOTREATMENTSWEREIMPLEMENTED
THEATER RADIO READING OR RECITATION FOR OTHER STUDENTS IN WITHFIDELITYINTHEFOURCLASSROOMS#LASSROOMOBSERVATIONS
CLASSESWITHINTHESCHOOL WERE ALSO PERIODICALLY VIDEOTAPED TO PROVIDE RESEARCHERS
WITH INTACT RECORDS OF ACTUAL PRACTICE SESSIONS AND THE
0ROCEDURE ACCOMPANYING DIALOGUE BETWEEN TEACHERS AND STUDENTS
7EUSEDTHESEDATAALONGWITHWRITTENOBSERVATIONSTOCON
7E ASSESSED THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE STRATIFIED RANDOM STRUCT THE CLASSROOM INSTRUCTIONAL AND PROCEDURAL DESCRIP
ASSIGNMENTPROCEDURESPRIORTOTHEONSETOFTHESTUDYWITH TIONS IN THIS REPORT 7E COLLECTED 42*S TO GAIN INSIGHTS
AN ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE !./6!  #OMPARISON OF STU INTOTEACHERSPERCEIVEDSTRUGGLESANDTRIUMPHSINWORKING
DENTSPRETESTPASSAGESCORESCONFIRMEDNOSIGNIFICANTINITIAL WITHTHEVARIEDREADINGFLUENCYPRACTICEROUTINES3TUDENT
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TWO RANDOMLY ASSIGNED FLUENCY ANSWERSTOPRE ANDPOSTSTUDYSTRUCTUREDQUESTIONSPROVIDED
PRACTICE TREATMENT GROUPS A ACCURACY 0OTS PASSAGE & INSIGHTINTOSTUDENTSPERCEPTIONSOFTHETWOREADINGPRAC
  P ACCURACY&IELD4RIPPASSAGE &   TICETREATMENTS
 PB RATE0OTSPASSAGE &   P
RATE&IELD4RIPPASSAGE &   PC EXPRES 1UANTITATIVE2ESULTS
SION0OTSPASSAGE &   P EXPRESSION&IELD
4RIP PASSAGE &    P   D COMPREHENSION 4ABLES  AND  DISPLAY PRETEST AND POSTTEST MEANS AND
0OTSPASSAGE &   P ORALRETELLING&IELD4RIP STANDARDDEVIATIONSFORTHETHIRD GRADECLASSROOMSANDTHE
PASSAGE &   P TWOTREATMENTSONACCURACY RATE EXPRESSION ANDCOMPRE
HENSION SCORES FOR THE TWO PRETEST PASSAGES 0OTS AND 4HE
&IELD 4RIP AND THE TWO POSTTEST PASSAGES -Y 0ARENTS AND
$ATA3OURCESAND!NALYSIS
0LANTINGA'ARDEN 
7E ANALYZED DATA ACCORDING TO A SEQUENTIAL QUANTITA %IGHT SEPARATE !./6! GAIN SCORE ANALYSES WERE USED
TIVEnQUALITATIVEPROCESS4ASHAKKORI4EDDLIE  4HE TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE 3C32 OR '2/2 READING FLUENCY
DOMINANTQUANTITATIVEDATAWEREANALYZEDUSING!./6! PRACTICEROUTINESWEREEQUALLYEFFECTIVEINTERMSOFDECREASING

4!",%$ESCRIPTIVE3TATISTICSFOR&LUENCYAND#OMPREHENSION0RETESTS BY#LASSROOMAND4REATMENT

'2/2CLASSROOMS 3C32CLASSROOMS
#LASS #LASS 4REATMENTGROUP #LASS #LASS 4REATMENTGROUP
0RETEST - 3$ - 3$ - 3$ - 3$ - 3$ - 3$

!CCURACY
0OTS            
4HE&IELD4RIP            
2EADINGRATE
0OTS            
4HE&IELD4RIP            
%XPRESSION
0OTS            
4HE&IELD4RIP            
#OMPREHENSION
0OTS            
4HE&IELD4RIP            

.OTE'2/2GUIDEDREPEATEDORALREADING3C32SCAFFOLDEDSILENTREADING
3EPTEMBER/CTOBER;6OL.O = 

4!",%$ESCRIPTIVE3TATISTICSFOR&LUENCYAND#OMPREHENSION0OSTTESTS BY#LASSROOMAND4REATMENT

'2/2CLASSROOMS 3C32CLASSROOMS
#LASS #LASS 4REATMENTGROUP #LASS #LASS 4REATMENTGROUP
0OSTTESTS - 3$ - 3$ - 3$ - 3$ - 3$ - 3$

!CCURACY
-Y0ARENTS            
0LANTINGA'ARDEN            
2EADINGRATE
-Y0ARENTS            
0LANTINGA'ARDEN            
%XPRESSION
-Y0ARENTS            
0LANTINGA'ARDEN            
#OMPREHENSION
-Y0ARENTS            
0LANTINGA'ARDEN            

.OTE'2/2GUIDEDREPEATEDORALREADING3C32SCAFFOLDEDSILENTREADING

STUDENTSERRORSANDIMPROVINGSTUDENTSACCURACY READINGRATE PACEONTHE0LANTINGA'ARDENPASSAGE &   P


EXPRESSION ANDCOMPREHENSION "OTHTREATMENTSRESULTEDINAAVERAGEINCREASEIN
MEANEXPRESSIONRATINGSCORESFORSTUDENTSINTHE3C32AND
!CCURACY '2/2GROUPS

4HERE WAS NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE 3C32 #OMPREHENSION/RAL2ETELLING3CORES


OR'2/2TREATMENTSONTHEMEANGAINSCORESREDUCTION
OFERRORS DURING MINREADINGSAMPLESFORTHE-Y0ARENTS 4HEREWASNOSIGNIFICANTMEANGAINDIFFERENCEBETWEEN
PASSAGE &   P ORTHE0LANTINGA'ARDEN THE3C32OR'2/2TREATMENTSINTHEPROPORTIONOFNUM
PASSAGE &   P"OTHREADINGTREATMENT BER OF IDEA UNITS RECALLED PER WCPM ON THE -Y 0ARENTS
APPROACHESRESULTEDINAAVERAGEDECREASEINTHEMEAN PASSAGE &    P   OR THE 0LANTING A 'ARDEN
NUMBEROFERRORSMADEBYSTUDENTSINTHE3C32OR'2/2 PASSAGE &   P"OTHREADINGFLUENCYPRAC
GROUPSOVERTHECOURSEOFTHEYEAR LONGSTUDY TICEAPPROACHESRESULTEDINAAVERAGEINCREASEINTHE
PROPORTION OF NUMBER OF IDEA UNITS RECALLED PER WCPM BY
STUDENTSINTHE3C32AND'2/2GROUPS
2ATE

4HERE WAS NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE 3C32 1UALITATIVE2ESULTS


OR'2/2TREATMENTSONTHEMEANGAINSCORESFORNUMBER
OF WCPM FOR THE -Y 0ARENTS PASSAGE &    P  4REATMENT&IDELITY
 ORTHE0LANTINGA'ARDENPASSAGE &   P /N THE BASIS OF CONSISTENT WEEKLY CLASSROOM OBSERVA
 OVERTHECOURSEOFTHEYEAR LONGSTUDY"OTHTREATMENTS TIONS THE RESEARCH TEAM JUDGED THE FIDELITY OF TREATMENT
RESULTEDINAAVERAGEINCREASEINTHENUMBEROFWORDS IMPLEMENTATION TO BE GOOD WITH THE TEACHERS REGULARLY
READCORRECTLYINMINOFREADINGBYSTUDENTSINTHE3C32 IMPLEMENTING THE SPECIFIED READING FLUENCY PRACTICE ROU
OR'2/2GROUPS TINESASPERTHETRAININGTHEYRECEIVED

%XPRESSION 3TUDENT)NTERVIEWS
4HERE WAS A SIGNIFICANT MEAN GAIN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN !T THE OUTSET AND CONCLUSION OF THE STUDY THE THIRD
THE 3C32 OR '2/2 TREATMENTS FAVORING THE 3C32 GROUP GRADE STUDENTS WERE ASKED TO RESPOND TO THREE STRUCTURED
MEANGAINONEXPRESSIONASMEASUREDBYPHRASING VOLUME INTERVIEWQUESTIONS7EPRESENTTHESEQUESTIONSANDTYPICAL
SMOOTHNESS ANDPACEONTHE-Y0ARENTSPASSAGE &  RESPONSESINTHEFALLANDSPRINGOFTHESCHOOLYEAR
 P4HEREWASNOSIGNIFICANTMEANGAINDIFFER 1UESTION  (OW DO YOU THINK YOUR READING ALOUD SOUNDS
ENCE BETWEEN THE 3C32 OR '2/2 TREATMENTS ON EXPRES NOW 2ESPONSES BY STUDENTS IN BOTH PRACTICE GROUPS IN
SION AS MEASURED BY PHRASING VOLUME SMOOTHNESS AND THEFALLRANGEDFROMhNOTVERYGOODvTOhSOUNDSGREATvOR
 4HE*OURNALOF%DUCATIONAL2ESEARCH

hSOUNDS EXCITING LIKE A GOOD STORYv 4HE MOST FREQUENTLY 3TUDENTS IN THE '2/2 GROUP IN THE SPRING INDICATED
OCCURRING RESPONSE WAS hOKAY v WITH FEWER STUDENTS INDI THAT GOOD READERS A h!CT LIKE ITS HAPPENING TO THEM AS
CATING hGOODv )N THE SPRING RESPONSES BY STUDENTS IN THEY READ 3TOP AT PERIODSv B h-AKES THINGS EXCITING
BOTH PRACTICE GROUPS HAD SHIFTED FROM THE MOST FREQUENT (AS LOTS OF EXPRESSION 2EAD AT A GOOD SPEEDv C h3AY
RESPONSE OF hOKAYv TOWARD THE RESPONSE OF hGOODv 3TU THE WORDS CLEARLY TALK SO EVERYONE CAN HEAR NOT BORING
DENTSINTHE3C32GROUPADDEDLITTLEORNOEXPLANATIONTO USES GOOD EXPRESSIONv D h2EADS GOOD BOOKSv E h.OT
THESEBRIEFCHARACTERIZATIONSOFTHEIRREADINGALOUD(OW CHOPPY CANREADHARDBOOKSvANDF h&IXESMISTAKESv
EVER THESTUDENTSINTHE'2/2GROUPRESPONDEDNOTONLY
WITH THE TYPICAL hOKAYv OR hGOOD v BUT SEVERAL STUDENTS 4EACHER2EFLECTION*OURNALS
VOLUNTARILY ADDED EXPLANATIONS FOR THESE RESPONSES SUCH
AS hBETTER THAN LAST TIMEv OR hBETTER THAN IT USED TO BEv )NADDITIONTOTHESTUDENTRESPONSESTOTHEPRE ANDPOST
h3OMETIMES ) HAVE EXPRESSION SOMETIMES ) DONT AND STUDY STRUCTURED INTERVIEW QUESTIONS EACH WEEK TEACHERS
SOMETIMES)GOTOOFASTvANDh)STOPATPERIODSNOWAND WEREASKEDTORESPONDINWRITINGTOTHREEQUESTIONS
HAVEBETTEREXPRESSIONv 1UESTION7HATDIFFICULTIESAREYOUENCOUNTERINGWITHTHETWO
1UESTION  )F YOU DONT THINK YOUR READING ALOUD SOUNDS FLUENCYPRACTICETREATMENTS!TFIRST THEREWASCLEAREVIDENCE
GOOD WHAT DO YOU DO TO FIX IT )N THE FALL ANSWERS TO THATTEACHERSINBOTHGROUPSWERESOMEWHATUNSUREOFTHEM
THIS QUESTION FROM STUDENTS IN THE 3C32 GROUP INCLUDED SELVES4HISMAYHAVEBEENBECAUSEOFCONDITIONSINWHICH
RESPONSESSUCHAShREADALOUDvORhREADMOREOFTEN vhPRAC THEIRTEACHINGWASUNDERINTENSEOBSERVATIONANDTHEIRWRIT
TICE vhREADLOUDER vANDhREADITAGAINvORhOVERANDOVERv TENLESSONPLANSWERESCRUTINIZED!LSO FLUENCYPRACTICEWAS
!NSWERSTOTHISQUESTIONFROMTHE'2/2GROUPINTHEFALL NOTACOMMONPARTOFTHEIRREGULARREADINGINSTRUCTIONUPTO
INCLUDEDRESPONSESSUCHAShSPEAKCLEARLY vhREADTHEWORDS THISTIME!LLTEACHERSINDICATEDACONCERNABOUTWHETHER
CORRECTLY vhREADOVERUNTILITSOUNDSRIGHT vh)DONTKNOW v THEY WERE hDOING THE FLUENCY PRACTICE RIGHTv 4HEY MADE
hSOUNDOUTTHEWORD vhREADSLOWER vhFIXMISTAKES vhPRAC COMMENTSSUCHASh)FELTALITTLEUNSUREABOUTHOW)SHOULD
TICE vANDhREADEASIERBOOKSv MONITORTHESTUDENTSvORh)WASWORRIEDTHAT)WASNOTDOING
)N THE SPRING STUDENTS IN BOTH GROUPS ADDED A NUMBER THE READING PRACTICE RIGHT MAYBE ) WAS LEAVING SOMETHING
OF ELABORATED RESPONSES TO THIS QUESTION 2EPONSES IN THE OUTv!STIMEPROGRESSED THETEACHERSSEEMEDTORELAXAND
3C32AND'2/2GROUPSINCLUDEDSUGGESTIONS SUCHASA FEELCOMFORTABLEWITHTHEIRFLUENCYPRACTICESESSIONSANDTHE
PRACTICEB READMOREC USEEXPRESSIOND GOBACKAND ONGOINGPROCESSOFCLASSROOMOBSERVATIONS4HEIRCOMMENTS
STARTALLOVERE IFYOUDONTKNOWAWORD ASKFORHELPF INCLUDEDh)FELTMORERELAXEDANDLESSSTRESSEDvANDh3EEMS
READSLOWERˆUNDERSTANDWORDS NOTJUSTGOQUICKLYG USE TOBEGOINGWELLˆFEELSVERYCOMFORTABLEv
PUNCTUATION H MAKE THE SOUND OF EACH LETTER AND THEN !CONSTANTCOMPARATIVEANALYSISOFTHECLASSROOMOBSER
BLENDTHEMTOGETHERTOGETTHEWORDI MAKEITEXCITING VATIONS INDICATED SIMILAR TRENDS 4EACHER IMPLEMENTATION
J TAKEABIGBREATHANDREADTOTHECOMMAORENDPUNC OF THE FLUENCY PRACTICE ROUTINES BEGAN A LITTLE UNSURE BUT
TUATIONK SLOWDOWNANDL USEMOREEXPRESSION WITHINAMATTEROFTOWEEKSFROMTHEONSETOFTHESTUDY
1UESTION  7HAT DOES A GOOD READER SOUND LIKE TO YOU THETEACHERSWEREIMPLEMENTINGTHEIRASSIGNEDFORMSOFFLU
3TUDENTSINTHE3C32GROUPINTHEFALLINDICATEDTHATGOOD ENCYPRACTICEWELLANDWITHLESSSTRESSANDINCREASEDCONFI
READERSSOUNDLIKEA h4HEYKNOWWHATTHEYARESAYING DENCE4HISISNOTTOSAYTHATIMPLEMENTATIONATTHEINITIAL
9OU GET A PICTURE IN YOUR MINDv B h3OMEONE WHO CAN STAGES OF THE STUDY WAS POOR /N A FIVE POINT OBSERVATION
READ FASTv C h3OMEONE WHO TALKS OUT LOUD WITH EXPRES SCALEATTHENDWEEK INITIALTEACHERIMPLEMENTATIONWAS
SIONvD h2EADSNOTTOOFASTANDNOTTOOSLOWˆJUSTRIGHTv JUDGEDANAVERAGEOF(OWEVER BYTHEENDOFTHESTUDY
E h&IXESMISTAKESvANDF h,OOKATEACHWORDCAREFULLY THWEEK THETEACHERSWEREAVERAGINGAOBSERVA
ANDREADNICELYv3TUDENTSINTHE'2/2GROUPINTHEFALL TIONRATING SHOWINGTHEIMPROVEDCONFIDENCEANDSKILL
INDICATEDTHATGOODREADERSSOUNDLIKETHEYA h2EADEVERY 1UESTION  7HAT IS GOING WELL FOR YOU WITH THE FLUENCY
WORDGOODvB h(AVEABEAUTIFULVOICEvC h'OBACKAND PRACTICETREATMENTS4HEREWASAGAINSOMEEVIDENCEWITHIN
REREADv D h.OTICE THE PUNCTUATIONv E h2EAD SLOWER RESPONSES INITIALLY THAT TEACHERS IN BOTH GROUPS WERE
AND THINK ABOUT THE BOOKv AND F h2EAD LOUDER WITH UNSURE OF THEIR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FLUENCY PRACTICE
EXPRESSIONANDDONTMAKEMISTAKESv TREATMENTS (OWEVER THE PREPONDERANCE OF RESPONSES TO
)NTHESPRING STUDENTSINTHE3C32GROUPINDICATEDTHAT THIS PARTICULAR QUESTION SEEMED TO FOCUS ON THE STUDENTS
GOOD READERS A h'O BACK AND FIX MISTAKESv B h2EAD ANDTHEIRPARTICIPATIONRATHERTHANONTEACHERSANDTHEIR
SMOOTH CLEARLY AND LOUD ENOUGH THAT OTHERS CAN HEARv COMFORTLEVELS&OREXAMPLE COMMENTSWEREMADESUCHAS
C h2EADLOTSOFBOOKSvD h$ONTREADDULLPUTVOICEIN THEFOLLOWINGh4HESTUDENTSWHOLOVETOREADAREENJOY
REALLYUNDERSTANDANDNOTTOOFASTANDNOTTOOSLOWvE INGTHISTIMEvh-ORESTUDENTSAREREADINGCHAPTERBOOKS
h2EAD WITH VOICE 7ATCHES BOLD WORDS WHEN SHE MESSES ANDSEEMTOBEREALLYENJOYINGTHEMvANDh+IDSAREREALLY
UP SHEREREADS)FSHEDOESNTKNOWAWORD SHEGETSHELP ENJOYINGITANDGETTINGMOREEXPRESSIVEINTHEIRORALREAD
OR LOOKS IT UPv F h7ATCHES COMMAS AND EXCLAMATION INGv !S THE STUDY PROGRESSED RESPONSES TO THIS QUESTION
POINTSvANDG h'OESBACKANDFIXESMISTAKESv VARIED SIGNIFICANTLY &OR EXAMPLE h3OME STUDENTS WHO
3EPTEMBER/CTOBER;6OL.O = 

DID NOT ENJOY READING ARE NOW COMPLETING THEIR BOOKSv 'IVEN THAT THE FINDING BETWEEN THE TWO TREATMENT
h4HELESSONSAREGOINGFASTER WITHMOREANDMORESTUDENT GROUPS WAS ESSENTIALLY EQUIVALENT WE ASK WHAT WAS THE
PARTICIPATIONv AND h4HE STUDENTS LOVED LISTENING TO THE OVERALLIMPACTOFTHESETWOREADINGFLUENCYPRACTICETREAT
TEACHERMAKEMISTAKESv4HISWASDONEWHILEMODELING MENTSONTHEFLUENCYGROWTHOFTHETHIRD GRADESTUDENTS
FLUENCYANDFIX UPSTRATEGIES !TTHEENDOFTHESTUDYTHE IN THIS STUDY !T THE BEGINNING OF THE THIRD GRADE YEAR
READINGCOACHNOTEDINHEROBSERVATIONS h%VERYTEACHER THE AVERAGE READING RATE OF THE THIRD GRADE GROUP OF 
INCLUDINGMYSELF LEARNEDALOTABOUTPROVIDINGTHECONDI STUDENTS IN THIS STUDY WAS  WCPM AS MEASURED BY THE
TIONSFORGOODREADINGPRACTICEv COMBINEDAVERAGEWCPMSCORESONTHETWOPRETESTPASSAG
1UESTION7HATEFFECTS IFANY AREYOUNOTICINGONYOUR ES!SMEASURED THEAVERAGEREADINGRATEFORTHISCOHORT
STUDENTS WITH EACH FLUENCY PRACTICE TREATMENT $URING THE GROUPOFTHIRDGRADERSWASBELOWTHETH PERCENTILEPER
INITIALSTAGESOFTHESTUDY TEACHERSCOMPLAINEDABOUTSTU FORMANCE OF  WCPM FOR END OF SECOND GRADE STUDENTS
DENT PARTICIPATION IN READING SILENTLY /NE TEACHER WROTE NATIONALLY(ASBROUCK4INDAL  
h) NOTICE NOW THAT SOME STUDENTS JUST DO NOT READ DURING !T THE END OF THE THIRD GRADE YEAR THE AVERAGE READ
THE  MINUTES OF PRACTICEv !NOTHER WROTE h3TUDENTS ING RATE OF THE  THIRD GRADE STUDENTS IN THIS STUDY WAS
WHOREALLYWANTMETOHEARTHEMPRACTICEAREDEVELOPING  WCPM AS MEASURED BY THE COMBINED AVERAGE WCPM
GOOD SKILLS ) NOTICE THAT SOME STUDENTS DO NOT LIKE TO BE SCORESONTHETWOPOSTTESTPASSAGES4HUS THESESTUDENTS
HEARDORPERFORMv(OWEVER ASTIMEPROGRESSED THETEACH READING FLUENCY RATES IN AT RISK SCHOOL SETTINGS AT END OF
ERSFELTTHATSTUDENTSWEREGETTINGINTOPRACTICETIME/NE YEAR WAS APPROACHING NATIONAL TH PERCENTILE NORMS
'2/2 TEACHER RECORDED h4HE STUDENTS IN THIS GROUP ARE THAT DEPENDING ON THE NORMS CONSULTED RANGE BETWEEN
ANINTERESTINGGROUP)TISEXCITINGTOPAIRTHEMUPWITHA n WCPM !LSO THE '2/2 AND 3C32 TREATMENTS
PARTNERTHEYDIDNOTEXPECT)HAVENOTICEDTHEMHELPING HADBEGUNTOCLOSETHEGAPBETWEENBEGINNINGANDEND
EACH OTHER COMMENTING ON EACH OTHER AND ENCOURAGING OF YEAR NORMED TH PERCENTILE AVERAGE READING RATES
EACHOTHERv/NE3C32TEACHERWROTE h4HEYLIKETOREAD) FROMAN POINTDEFICITTOA TO POINTDEFICIT AGAIN
ENJOYHEARINGTHESTUDENTSTELLMEABOUTTHEIRREADING4HE DEPENDINGONTHENORMSCONSULTED(ASBROUCK4INDAL
EXCITEMENTANDENERGYISCONTAGIOUSWHENTHEYREADABOOK 4ORGESON(UDSON  
THEYENJOYv4OWARDTHEENDOFTHESTUDY ALLTEACHERSNOTED !CCORDINGTONATIONALNORMS THEAVERAGEFLUENCYWCPM
SOMEFATIGUEWITHBOTHREADINGFLUENCYPRACTICETREATMENTS GAINFROMENDOFSECONDGRADETOENDOFTHIRDGRADEIS
4HEYWROTE h4HEYAREGETTINGSICKOFJUSTPRACTICINGTHEIR WCPM(ASBROUCK4INDAL  4HE3C32AND'2/2
READING)MSTARTINGTOLOSESOMEOFTHEMvANDh3OMEARE GROUPSEXCEEDEDTHENATIONALAVERAGEOFWCPMFLUENCY
BEGINNINGTOCOMPLAINEVERYMORNINGv GAINPERYEARBYATTAININGAWCPMPERYEARAVERAGEFLU
ENCYGAIN7ENOTESTUDENTSIN2%!SCHOOLSWERESELECTED
$ISCUSSION BECAUSE STUDENTS IN THESE SCHOOLS WERE CONSIDERED HIGH
POVERTYANDLOWPERFORMING4HEREFORE PERFORMINGATTHE
4HE PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY WAS TO ANSWER THE RESEARCH AVERAGEWOULDBECONSIDEREDANEXCELLENTOUTCOMEINTHESE
QUESTION)SSCAFFOLDEDSILENTREADING3C32 ASEFFECTIVEAS SCHOOLS (OWEVER THE AVERAGE WCPM READING RATE GAIN IN
GUIDEDREPEATEDORALREADING'2/2 WITHFEEDBACKINPRO THE3C32GROUPOVERTHEYEARSLIGHTLYEXCEEDEDTHE'2/2
MOTINGTHIRD GRADESTUDENTSDEVELOPMENTOFREADINGFLUENCY GROUPAVERAGEWCPMREADINGRATEGAINBUTULTIMATELYRESULT
ASMEASUREDBYA REDUCTIONINERRORRATESB INCREASEIN ED IN NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO GROUPS
WORDSREADCORRECTLYPERMINUTEC INCREASEINEXPRESSION MEANGAINSCORES4HUS RELATIVELYANDABSOLUTELYSPEAKING
RATING SCORES AND D INCREASE IN READING COMPREHENSION THE TWO READING FLUENCY PRACTICE TREATMENTS IN THIS STUDY
AS MEASURED BY THE PROPORTION OF IDEA UNITS RECALLED FROM HELPEDSTUDENTSINTHESEAT RISKSCHOOLSMAKEBETTER THAN
READINGDIVIDEDBYTHENUMBEROFWORDSREADCORRECTLYPER NATIONAL AVERAGE GAINS IN WCPM READING RATES AND ALSO
MINUTE7EDISCUSSEACHOFTHEMAJORFINDINGSOFTHISSTUDY HELPEDTOCLOSETHEGAPBETWEENTHESESTUDENTSBEGINNING
ANDEND OF YEARREADINGFLUENCYPERFORMANCE ASCOMPARED
&LUENCY0ERFORMANCE WITHTH PERCENTILENATIONALFLUENCYNORMS

4HERESULTSOFTHESTUDYFOUNDNOSIGNIFICANTDIFFERENCES #OMPREHENSION0ERFORMANCE
BETWEEN THE 3C32 AND '2/2 TREATMENTS ON THIRD GRADE
STUDENTSMEANGAINSCORESOFREADINGFLUENCY ASMEASURED 4HE RESULTS OF THIS STUDY REVEALED NO SIGNIFICANT DIF
BY ACCURACY OR RATE 4HERE WAS ONE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE FERENCES BETWEEN THE 3C32 AND '2/2 READING FLUENCY
FOUND ON STUDENTS EXPRESSION RATING SCORES FAVORING THE PRACTICE TREATMENTS IN IMPROVING THIRD GRADE STUDENTS
3C32 GROUP MEAN GAINS OVER THE '2/2 GROUP 4HUS READINGCOMPREHENSION"ECAUSETHEFINDINGBETWEENTHE
THESEFINDINGSINDICATETHATAN3C32APPROACHFORFLUENCY TWO COMPARISON READING FLUENCY TREATMENT GROUPS WAS
PRACTICEPRODUCEDRESULTSEQUIVALENTTOTHOSEOFTHESCIEN ESSENTIALLYEQUIVALENTAGAIN WEASK WHATWASTHEOVERALL
TIFICALLYVALIDATED'2/2ONFLUENCYGROWTHRATESFORTHIS IMPACT OF THESE TWO READING FLUENCY PRACTICE TREATMENTS
PARTICULARSAMPLEOFTHIRD GRADESTUDENTS ON THE COMPREHENSION PERFORMANCE OF THE STUDENTS IN
 4HE*OURNALOF%DUCATIONAL2ESEARCH

THISSTUDY!COMPARISONOFTHEAVERAGEPROPORTIONOFTHE TORESULTINMEASURABLEDIFFERENCESINREADINGFLUENCYAND
NUMBEROFIDEAUNITSRECALLEDPERWCPMATPRETEST COMPREHENSIONOUTCOMES
TO THE AVERAGE PROPORTION OF THE NUMBER OF IDEA UNITS
RECALLED PER WCPM AT POSTTEST  BY THESE STUDENTS ,IMITATIONSAND%DUCATIONAL)MPLICATIONS
REVEALEDAAVERAGEINCREASEINTHEMEANPROPORTION
OFTHENUMBEROFIDEAUNITSRECALLEDPERWCPM REPRESENT 4HISSTUDYWASLIMITEDINSEVERALIMPORTANTWAYS&IRST
INGASUBSTANTIALINCREASEINREADINGCOMPREHENSIONOVER THE STUDY WAS LIMITED TO A PARTICULAR SOCIOCULTURAL CON
THEYEARFORBOTHGROUPS TEXTˆTWO HIGH POVERTY LOW PERFORMING SCHOOLS IN THE
SOUTHWESTERN5NITED3TATES4HUS THERESULTSMAYNOTBE
GENERALIZABLE TO ALL STUDENTS ATTENDING MIDDLE OR UPPER
4EACHER#OMMENTSAND3TUDENT)NTERVIEWS
CLASSANDHIGH PERFORMINGSCHOOLS3ECOND THESAMPLESIZE
)N GENERAL STUDENTS INDICATED BOTH READING FLUENCY WASLIMITEDTOTHIRD GRADESTUDENTS!LTHOUGHTHISMOD
PRACTICE TREATMENTS HELPED THEM TO BECOME BETTER READ ERATE SAMPLE SIZE ALLOWED FOR CAREFUL CONTROL AND FIDELITY
ERS4EACHERSFOUNDSOMEINITIALPROBLEMSINIMPLEMENT RELATEDTOINTERNALVALIDITY THESAMPLESIZEALSOLIMITEDTHE
ING THE READING FLUENCY PRACTICE TREATMENTS (OWEVER GENERALIZABILITYOFTHEFINDINGSANDTHEDEGREESOFFREEDOM
AS THE YEAR PROGRESSED STUDENTS AND TEACHERS SEEMED TO AVAILABLE FOR CONDUCTING HYPOTHESIS TESTING 4HIRD THE
ENJOY THE TIME FOR PRACTICE 4OWARD THE END OF THE YEAR ASSESSMENT OF THE DEPENDENT VARIABLES IE FLUENCY AND
STUDENTS EXPRESSED FATIGUE WITH READING FLUENCY PRACTICE COMPREHENSION WAS LIMITED TO READING $)"%,3 PASSAGES
BUTTHISMAYHAVEREFLECTEDAGENERALFATIGUEWITHSCHOOL TWO PRE AND TWO POSTASSESSMENT PASSAGES &OURTH THE
ING 0REVIOUS RESEARCHERS HAVE INDICATED THAT STUDENTS INABILITYTOIMPLEMENTATRUECONTROLGROUPOFNOTREATMENT
DO BECOME FATIGUED WITH SINGULAR FORMS OF READING FLU LIMITSTHEINTERPRETATIONOFTHEFINDINGS&IFTH WECOULDNOT
ENCY PRACTICE 'AMBRELL  ,EE $ANIELS  -URRAY ACCOUNT FOR THE TOTAL TIME CHILDREN SPENT READING OUTSIDE
  )N GENERAL THE  TEACHERS FELT 3C32 AND '2/2 OFSCHOOL
WEREREADILYIMPLEMENTEDANDHADTHEINTENDEDEFFECTOF 7ECANNOTBECERTAINTHAT3C32AND'2/2WOULDHAVE
IMPROVING STUDENTS READING FLUENCY AND COMPREHENSION BEEN SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER THAN A CONTROL GROUP IN WHICH
OVERTHEYEAR!LSO STUDENTSSEEMEDTOCONCURWITHTHESE THE REGULAR READING INSTRUCTIONAL ACTIVITIES WERE EXTENDED
OBSERVATIONS THAT 3C32 AND '2/2 WERE ENJOYABLE AND FOR AN EQUAL AMOUNT OF TIME FOR IMPROVING THIRD GRADE
USEFUL ANDTHEYBOTHLEADTOINCREASEDCONFIDENCEINTHEIR STUDENTSREADINGFLUENCYANDCOMPREHENSION(OWEVER IN
ABILITIESASREADERS DEFENSEOFTHEDESIGNUSED THESTUDYWASNOTASTUDYOFTHE
&ROMTHERESULTSOFTHISSTUDYANDOTHERS ITAPPEARSTHAT EFFECTSOFNOREADINGFLUENCYPRACTICEBUTRATHERASTUDYOF
STUDENTS CONTINUE TO DEVELOP FLUENCY THROUGHOUT THIRD TWOPRACTICALLYANDTHEORETICALLYDIFFERENTREADINGFLUENCY
GRADE3CHWANENFLUGELETAL  4HEDIMINISHEDROLE PRACTICETREATMENTSˆ3C32AND'2/2&URTHERMORE THE
THAT AUTOMATICITY AND DECODING PLAY IN READING COMPRE EFFECTIVENESS OF '2/2 IN IMPROVING STUDENTS READING
HENSION AS STUDENTS GET OLDER IS WELL ESTABLISHED 0ARIS ACHIEVEMENT IS WELL ESTABLISHED IN SCORES OF EXPERIMENTAL
#ARPENTER 0ARIS  (AMILTON  0IKULSKI  #HARD STUDIESASREPORTEDBYTHE.20.)#(($  
 3CHWANENFLUGEL ET AL   (OWEVER BY THIRD &IRST FUTURE RESEARCHERS SHOULD USE OTHER COMPARISON
GRADE WORD READING TYPICALLY REQUIRES REDUCED COGNITIVE GROUPS AND IF POSSIBLE A CONTROL NO TREATMENT GROUP
RESOURCES ALLOWINGSTUDENTSTOFOCUSTHEIRATTENTIONMORE AND LARGER NUMBERS OF STUDENTS TO INCREASE THE EXTERNAL
INTENTLY ON READING COMPREHENSION !S MEASURED IN THIS VALIDITY AND THE DEGREES OF FREEDOM FOR HYPOTHESIS TEST
STUDY THE MODE OF READING FLUENCY PRACTICE WHETHER ORAL ING3ECOND FUTURERESEARCHERSSHOULDEXAMINETHEUSEOF
READINGOR3C32 PROVIDEDNODATASHOWINGNEGATIVECON 3C32AND'2/2WITHAVARIETYOFLEVELSOFSTUDENTABILITY
SEQUENCESONTHESTUDENTSREADINGFLUENCYANDCOMPREHEN ANDACROSSAVARIETYOFSCHOOLS4HIRD TIMESPENTREADING
SIONPERFORMANCE AT THE INDIVIDUAL AND CLASSROOM LEVELS BOTH IN AND OUT OF
"OTHREPEATEDANDWIDEREADINGFLUENCYPRACTICEHELPED SCHOOLNEEDSTOBECAREFULLYCONTROLLEDORACCOUNTEDFORIN
STUDENTSINTHISTHIRD GRADECOHORTINTWOAT RISKELEMEN FUTURERESEARCHTOASSURETHATTHEEFFECTSOFCOMPARISONSARE
TARY SCHOOLS TO INCREASE THEIR READING FLUENCY AND COM ONLY ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE TREATMENTS &OURTH WE EVALUATED
PREHENSION 4HE USE OF DIFFERING LEVELS OF TEXT DIFFICULTY WHOLE APPROACHES FOR PRACTICING READING FLUENCY AND DID
DEPENDENT ON THE AMOUNT OF SCAFFOLDING SUPPORT AND NOT ENGAGE IN ANALYTIC MEASUREMENT OF EVERY CONTRASTING
MONITORING APPEARED TO PROVIDE EQUALLY EFFECTIVE FLU ELEMENT WITHIN THESE PROGRAMS PACKAGES OR APPROACHES
ENCY AND COMPREHENSION OUTCOMES FOR THESE THIRD GRADE TO FLUENCY PRACTICE )T IS POSSIBLE THAT ONLY A FEW OF THE
STUDENTS 3IMILARLY THE PRACTICE OF READING IN ISOLATION CONTRASTING AND SIMILAR FEATURES OF THE FLUENCY PRACTICE
VERSUS WITH OTHERS DID NOT APPEAR TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE TREATMENTSMAYHAVEACCOUNTEDFORTHEFINDINGOFNODIF
IN THE OUTCOME OF THESE STUDENTS READING FLUENCY AND FERENCESBETWEENTHEGAINSSCORESOFTHE3C32AND'2/2
COMPREHENSIONOUTCOMES NORDIDTEACHERVERSUSSTUDENT TREATMENT GROUPS &UTURE RESEARCHERS MAY NEED TO TAKE A
SELECTION OF THE TEXTS TO BE PRACTICED 4HUS THE DIFFER MORE ANALYTICAL APPROACH TO UNCOVER WHICH DIFFERENCES
ENCESORCONTRASTSBETWEEN3C32AND'2/2DIDNOTSEEM BETWEENFLUENCYPRACTICETREATMENTSMAY WHENCOMBINED
3EPTEMBER/CTOBER;6OL.O = 

WITH OTHERS RESULT IN POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE OUTCOMES FOR 2%&%2%.#%3
FLUENCYPRACTICE,AST THESTUDYWASLIMITEDTO3C32AND
'2/2 AS THE ONLY FLUENCY PRACTICE TREATMENTS EVALUATED !LLINGTON 2 ,   "IG BROTHER AND THE NATIONAL READING CURRICULUM
(OWIDEOLOGYTRUMPEDEVIDENCE0ORTSMOUTH .((EINEMANN
WITH A SINGLE GRADE LEVEL OF STUDENTS ! LOGICAL STEP FOR "EAVER * $EVELOPMENTALREADINGASSESSMENT5PPER3ADDLE2IVER
FUTURERESEARCHERSWOULDINVOLVETHESYSTEMATICEVALUATION .*0EARSON%DUCATION
OFVARIOUSCONFIGURATIONSORCONTRASTSOFAVARIETYOFREADING "RYAN ' &AWSON 0# 2EUTZEL $2 3USTAINEDSILENTREAD
FLUENCYPRACTICETREATMENTSWITHAVARIETYOFGRADELEVELS ING%XPLORINGTHEVALUEOFLITERATUREDISCUSSIONWITHTHREENON ENGAGED
READERS2EADING2ESEARCHAND)NSTRUCTION  n
)N SPITE OF THESE LIMITATIONS THIS STUDY EFFECTIVELY "URLEY *% 3HORT TERM HIGHINTENSITYREADINGPRACTICEMETHODS
ADDRESSEDSEVERALCONCERNSRELATEDTOPASTFLUENCYRESEARCH FOR 5PWARD "OUND STUDENTS !N APPRAISAL .EGRO %DUCATIONAL 2EVIEW
)N THE.20NOTEDANEEDFORMORERESEARCHONTHE  n
EFFECTS OF DIFFERING TYPES OF FLUENCY PRACTICE AND DIFFERING #AMPBELL $ 4  3TANLEY * #   %XPERIMENTAL AND QUASI EXPERI
MENTALDESIGNSFORRESEARCH"OSTON(OUGHTON-IFFLIN
AMOUNTS OF TIME ON FLUENCY OUTCOMES !LTHOUGH WE DID #LINE 2+* +RETKE ', !NEVALUATIONOFLONG TERM332
NOTEXAMINEDIFFERINGAMOUNTSOFTIMEALLOCATEDTOFLUENCY INTHEJUNIORHIGHSCHOOL*OURNALOF2EADING  n
PRACTICE AS WAS RECOMMENDED BY THE .20 .)#(($ #OLES '   -ISREADING READING 4HE BAD SCIENCE THAT HURTS STUDENTS
 WEDIDADDRESSTHESPECIFICRECOMMENDATIONOFTHE 0ORTSMOUTH .((EINEMANN
.20 THAT MORE RESEARCH ON 332 AND OTHER FLUENCY PRAC #OLLINS # 3USTAINEDSILENTREADINGPERIODS%FFECTSONTEACHERS
BEHAVIORS AND STUDENTS ACHIEVEMENT %LEMENTARY 3CHOOL *OURNAL 
TICE APPROACHES WAS NEEDED !FTER A CAREFUL EXAMINATION n
OF POTENTIAL PROBLEMS WITH THE PRACTICES AND CONDITIONS #UNNINGHAM *7 4HE.ATIONAL2EADING0ANEL2EPORT2EADING
OF TRADITIONALLY IMPLEMENTED 332 WE ADDRESSED THESE BY 2ESEARCH1UARTERLY  n
DESIGNINGANDTESTINGANALTERNATIVETREATMENTFORREADING #UNNINGHAM 0 -   3YSTEMATIC SEQUENTIAL PHONICS THEY USE &OR
BEGINNINGREADERSOFALLAGES'REENSBORO .##ARSON $ELLOSA
FLUENCY PRACTICE CALLED 3C32 !S SUCH 3C32 IS DIFFERENT $AVIS :4 !COMPARISONOFTHEEFFECTIVENESSOFSUSTAINEDSILENT
FROMTHETRADITIONALLYIMPLEMENTED INDEPENDENT332 READINGANDDIRECTEDREADINGACTIVITYONSTUDENTSREADINGACHIEVEMENT
7ITH RESPECT TO THE EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THIS (IGH3CHOOL*OURNAL  n
STUDY THE .20 .)#(($  OBSERVED h4HERE IS %DMONDSON *  3HANNON 0   4HE WILL OF THE PEOPLE )N 2
, !LLINGTON %D "IG BROTHER AND THE NATIONAL READING CURRICULUM
A NEED FOR RIGOROUS EVALUATIONS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF (OW IDEOLOGY TRUMPED EVIDENCE PP n  0ORTSMOUTH .(
ENCOURAGING WIDE READING ON READING ACHIEVEMENT PAR (EINEMANN
TICULARLYWITHPOPULARPROGRAMSSUCHAS332 $%!2 AND %VANS (- 4OWNER *# 3USTAINEDSILENTREADING$OESIT
INCREASESKILLS2EADING4EACHER  n
!2v.)#(($ P (IEBERT NOTED h3UCCESSFUL
&OUNTAS )# 0INNELL '3 'UIDEDREADING'OODFIRSTTEACHING
FLUENCY INTERVENTIONS NEED TO PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR FORALLCHILDREN0ORTSMOUTH .((EINEMANN
STUDENTS TO TRANSFER THEIR SKILLS TO SILENT READING 'IVING 'AMBRELL ," 'ETTINGSTARTEDWITHSUSTAINEDSILENTREADINGAND
STUDENTS A PURPOSE FOR READING A TEXT AND A DEFINITE TIME KEEPINGITGOING2EADING4EACHER  n
PERIOD IN WHICH TO ACCOMPLISH IT PROVIDES SCAFFOLDING FOR 'OOD 2 (  +AMINSKI 2 !   $)"%,3 /RAL 2EADING &LUENCY
0ASSAGESFORFIRSTTHROUGHTHIRDGRADES4ECHNICAL2EPORT.O %UGENE
SILENTREADINGvP  5NIVERSITYOF/REGON
)NTHISSTUDY WEDEMONSTRATEDTHATTHIRD GRADESTUDENTS (ASBROUCK *  4INDAL '   /RAL READING FLUENCY NORMS !
CANBENEFITFROMREADINGFLUENCYPRACTICEUSING3C32AND VALUABLE ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR READING TEACHERS 2EADING 4EACHER 
n
'2/2 ASMEASUREDBYASSESSMENTSOFSTUDENTREADINGFLU
(IEBERT %( "ECOMINGFLUENT2EPEATEDREADINGWITHSCAFFOLDED
ENCYDECREASESINNUMBERSOFERRORSANDINCREASESINWCPM TEXTS )N 3 * 3AMUELS  ! % &ARSTRUP %DS 7HAT RESEARCH HAS TO
ANDEXPRESSIONRATINGSCORES ANDCOMPREHENSIONINCREAS SAYABOUTFLUENCYINSTRUCTIONPPn .EWARK $%)NTERNATIONAL
ESINTHEPROPORTIONOFIDEAUNITSRECALLEDPERWCPM 4HIS 2EADING!SSOCIATION
(OLT 3" /4UEL &3 4HEEFFECTOFSUSTAINEDSILENTREADINGAND
STUDY ALSO OFFERS TEACHERS GUIDANCE ON HOW TO EFFECTIVELY WRITINGONACHIEVEMENTANDATTITUDESOFSEVENTHANDEIGHTHGRADESTUDENTS
SCAFFOLDSILENTREADINGFORTHIRD GRADESTUDENTS4HESESTU READINGTWOYEARSBELOWGRADELEVEL2EADING)MPROVEMENT  n
DENTSNEEDTOBEACTIVELYMONITOREDDURINGSILENT READING +RASHEN 3 -ORESMOKEANDMIRRORS!CRITIQUEOFTHE.ATIONAL
PRACTICEASTHEYTRANSFERTHEIRORALREADINGFLUENCYSKILLSTO 2EADING0ANEL2EPORTON&LUENCY)N2,!LLINGTON%D "IGBROTHER
AND THE NATIONAL READING CURRICULUM (OW IDEOLOGY TRUMPED EVIDENCE PP
SILENT READINGPRACTICE n 0ORTSMOUTH .((EINEMANN
)N CONCLUSION THE RESULTS OF THIS STUDY PROVIDE EVIDENCE ,ANGFORD * #  !LLEN % '   4HE EFFECTS OF 5332 ON STU
THAT 3C32 IMPROVES THIRD GRADE STUDENTS FLUENCY AND DENTSATTITUDEANDACHIEVEMENT2EADING(ORIZONS  n
,EE $ANIELS 3, -URRAY "! $%!2ME7HATDOESITTAKE
COMPREHENSION GROWTH AS EFFECTIVELY AS '2/2 4HUS THIS TOGETMYSTUDENTSREADING2EADING4EACHER  n
FINDING PROVIDES TEACHERS AND CHILDREN A COMPLEMENTARY ,EINHARDT ' :IGMOND .  #OOLEY 7   2EADING INSTRUCTION
APPROACH 3C32 FOR READING FLUENCY PRACTICE TO THE EVI ANDITSEFFECTS!MERICAN%DUCATIONAL2ESEARCH*OURNAL  n
DENCE BASEDANDWELL ESTABLISHED'2/2APPROACH7EALSO -ANNING ' ,  -ANNING -   7HAT MODELS OF RECREATIONAL
READINGMAKEADIFFERENCE2EADING7ORLD  n
FOUNDTHATHAVINGMORETHANONEEFFECTIVEWAYTOPROVIDE -EISINGER ( 3CHWANENFLUGEL 0* "RADLEY % +UHN -2 3TAHL
YOUNGCHILDRENREADINGFLUENCYPRACTICEISIMPORTANTFORREA 3! $ECEMBER )NTERACTIONQUALITYDURINGPARTNERREADING0APER
SONSOFENGAGEMENTANDMOTIVATION/URQUALITATIVEFINDINGS PRESENTEDATTHEANNUALMEETINGOFTHE.ATIONAL2EADING#ONFERENCE
-IAMI &,
SHOWEDTHATWHENSINGLEREADINGFLUENCYPRACTICEAPPROACH
.ATIONAL )NSTITUTE OF #HILD (EALTH AND (UMAN $EVELOPMENT .)#(
ESWEREUSEDEXCLUSIVELYOVERLONGPERIODS THESEAPPROACHES ($  2EPORTOFTHE.ATIONAL2EADING0ANEL4EACHINGSTUDENTSTO
TENDEDTOWARDTEDIUMFORTEACHERSANDSTUDENTS READ7ASHINGTON $#!UTHOR
 4HE*OURNALOF%DUCATIONAL2ESEARCH

/PITZ -& 2ASINSKI 46 'OOD BYEROUNDROBINEFFECTIVE AND QUASI EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS FOR GENERALIZED CAUSAL INFERENCE "OSTON
ORALREADINGSTRATEGIES0ORTSMOUTH .((EINEMANN (OUGHTON-IFFLIN
0ARIS 3 ' #ARPENTER 2 $ 0ARIS ! (  (AMILTON % %   3NOW #% "URNS -3 'RIFFIN 0%DS  0REVENTINGREADINGDIF
3PURIOUS AND GENUINE CORRELATES OF STUDENTS READING COMPREHENSION FICULTIESINYOUNGCHILDREN7ASHINGTON $#.ATIONAL!CADEMIES0RESS
)N3'0ARIS3!3TAHL%DS 3TUDENTSREADINGCOMPREHENSIONAND 3TAHL 3 7HATDOWEKNOWABOUTFLUENCY)N0-C#ARDLE6
ASSESSMENTPPn -AHWAH .*%RLBAUM #HHABRA%DS 4HEVOICEOFEVIDENCEINREADINGRESEARCHPPn 
0ARIS 3 '  3TAHL 3 !   #HILDRENS READING COMPREHENSION AND "ALTIMORE0AUL("ROOKES
ASSESSMENT-AHWAH .*%RLBAUM 3TAHL 3! (EUBACH + &LUENCY ORIENTEDREADINGINSTRUCTION
0IKULSKI ** #HARD $* &LUENCY"RIDGEBETWEENDECODING )N+!$OUGHERTY3TAHL-#-C+ENNA%DS 2EADINGRESEARCHAT
ANDREADINGCOMPREHENSION2EADING4EACHER  n WORK&OUNDATIONSOFEFFECTIVEPRACTICEPPn .EW9ORK'UILFORD
2EUTZEL $2 &AWSON 0# 9OURCLASSROOMLIBRARY.EWWAYS 0RESS
TOGIVEITMORETEACHINGPOWER.EW9ORK3CHOLASTIC 3UMMERS %' -C#LELLAND *6 !FIELD BASEDEVALUATIONOF
2EUTZEL $2 (OLLINGSWORTH 0- 2EADINGCOMPREHENSION SUSTAINEDSILENTREADING332 ININTERMEDIATEGRADES!LBERTA*OURNALOF
SKILLS 4ESTING THE DISTINCTIVENESS HYPOTHESIS 2EADING 2ESEARCH AND %DUCATIONAL2ESEARCH  n
)NSTRUCTION  n 4ASHAKKORRI ! 4EDDLIE # -IX METHODOLOGY#OMBININGQUALI
3AMUELS 3* 4HE$)"%,3TESTS)SSPEEDOFBARKINGATPRINTWHAT TATIVEANDQUANTITATIVEAPPROACHES4HOUSAND/AKS #!3AGE
WEMEANBYREADINGFLUENCY2EADING2ESEARCH1UARTERLY  n 4ORGESON *+ (UDSON 2& 2EADINGFLUENCY#RITICALISSUES
3CHWANENFLUGEL 0* -EISINGER %" 7ISENBAKER *- +UHN -2 FOR STRUGGLING READERS )N 3 * 3AMUELS  ! % &ARSTRUP %DS 7HAT
3TRAUSS '0 -ORRIS 2$ "ECOMINGAFLUENTANDAUTOMATIC RESEARCHHASTOSAYABOUTFLUENCYINSTRUCTIONPPn .EWARK $%
READERINTHEEARLYELEMENTARYSCHOOLYEARS2EADING2ESEARCH1UARTERLY )NTERNATIONAL2EADING!SSOCIATION
 n :UTELL * 2ASINSKI 4 4RAININGTEACHERSTOATTENDTOTHEIRSTU
3HADISH 7 2 #OOK 4 $  #AMPBELL $ 4   %XPERIMENTAL DENTSORALREADINGFLUENCY4HEORY)NTO0RACTICE  n

-ÕLÃVÀˆLiÊ /œ`>ÞÊ >˜`Ê


VViÃÃÊ
œ˜ Ìi˜ÌÊ "˜ˆ˜it
4HE*OURNALOF%NVIRONMENTAL%DUCATIONISANESSENTIALTOOLINFASHIONINGMOREENVIRONMENTALLY
RESPONSIBLECITIZENSANDEFFECTIVETEACHERS0EER REVIEWEDARTICLESFEATURECUTTING EDGETHEORIES
METHODS ANDPRACTICESOFENVIRONMENTALEDUCATIONIN+nCLASSROOMS PUBLICPROGRAMS
ANDOTHERVENUES2EVIEWSOFRECENTTEACHINGMATERIALSSUCHASBOOKS TEXTBOOKS ANDVIDEOS
APPEARINEVERYISSUE*%%ISANINVALUABLERESOURCEFORSTUDENTS TEACHERS RESEARCHERS PROGRAM
ADMINISTRATORS ANDGRANTMAKERS
1UARTERLY)33. 
2EGULAR!NNUAL3UBSCRIPTION2ATES
)NDIVIDUALONLINEONLY PRINTANDONLINE
)NSTITUTIONALONLINEONLY PRINTONLY PRINTANDONLINE
!DDFORPOSTAGEOUTSIDETHE53

3UBSCR IPTION / FFICE


0/ " OX 
Ê",Ê6-/Ê1-Ê
" IR MINGHAM !,  
0  N & 
HELDREF SUBSCR IPTIONOFFICECOM
"  Ê/"Ê-1 -
, t
WWWHELDREFORG ,IBRARIESMAYORDERTHROUGHSUBSCRIPTIONAGENTS

You might also like