IRACST Engineering Science and Technology: An International Journal (ESTIJ), ISSN: 2250-3498,

Vol.2, No. 4, August 2012

660
Resource Management in
Construction Projects a case study
SK. Nagaraju
Lecturer, Department of Civil Engineering
Adama Science and Technology University (ASTU),
Adama, Ethiopia.
E-mail I.D: sknagaraju.ce@gmail.com
B. Sivakonda Reddy
Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering
J NTUH College of Engineering (AUTONOMOUS)
Hyderabad, India.
E-mail I.D: bskreddy_246@yahoo.com

Prof. A. Ray Chaudhuri
Department of Civil Engineering
Adama Science and Technology University (ASTU),
Adama, Ethiopia.
E-mail I.D: amroyc@gmail.com


Abstract- Construction Project refers to a high stake
endeavour aiming at time bound predetermined performance
objective. Unless matching resources are planned and procured,
no activity can be executed according to a prefixed time schedule.
Project managers must take complex decisions under different
scheduling needs (such as smooth resource utilization profiles
and resource constraints) and under conditions of uncertainty
that sometimes extend beyond task durations. The present study
deals with resource scheduling for a fast track project with
constrained durations.

The study has been carried out in two phases. In the
first phase, with the aid of PRIMAVERA software project
schedule for various activities for the construction of a
commercial building was prepared. Subsequently, requirements
of resources were attributed to the activities based on Standard
Schedule Rates (CPWD). The requisite data has been collected
from the detailed drawings and prevailing site conditions.

In the second phase, a Resource Constrained Analysis
was carried out by Resource Leveling for various activities by
decreasing resources with increased duration to study the
time-cost implications.

Keywords: Resource Management, Resource Leveling,
PRIMAVERA.

I. INTRODUCTION
Construction projects contain numerous inter-dependent
and inter-related activities. The fast changing environments of
the present era impose numerous financial, legal, ethical,
environmental and logistic constraints. They interact
technically, economically and socially within the environment
as well as with other organisation, structures and systems.
These projects employ voluminous resources. But they have
in-built difficulties, uncertainties and risks. These pose series
of problems concerning resources, like how much they are
required, where they are going to come from, when they
should be inducted at site, where they should be housed,
how to optimise their utilisation and when to demobilise.

In general, construction projects are of high value, and they
employ huge resources of men, materials and machines. Major
works involve heavy investments- say from a hundreds of
crores of rupees to a few thousands of rupees, the use of high
level technology and need an open ended model for effective
management of resources.

Due to the resource-driven nature of construction
management, Resource Management is really a difficult task.
The construction manager must develop a plan of action for
directing and controlling resources of workers, machines and
materials in coordinated and timely manner in order to deliver a
project within the frame of limited funding and time. Hence,
aside from a technology and process focus, a resource-use
focus must be adequately addressed in describing a
construction method or operation in a project plan.


II. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
A resource is an entity that contributes to the
accomplishment of project activities such as manpower,
material, money, equipment, time or space.

A. Importance of Resources in Construction Projects
The crucial factor in successful implementation of a
construction project not only depends on the quality & quantity
of work, but also largely depends on availability of resources.
All activities involved in the project require certain amount of
resources. Each activity is allocated with a specific resource
and must be completed within the time limit, otherwise it may
adversely effect the overall duration of the project.
IRACST Engineering Science and Technology: An International Journal (ESTIJ), ISSN: 2250-3498,
Vol.2, No. 4, August 2012
661
The time and cost are directly dependent on the availability
of resources. The time required may be determined by dividing
the productivity associated with the resources used on the
activity into the defined quantity of work for the activity. The
best combination of resources to use for performing a
construction activity is based on contractors ability to identify
the interdependencies of the various resources.

B. Methodology Adopted
This paper introduces a comprehensive framework for
resource management particularly related to manpower as
resource element in construction domain. This study is carried
out in two phases. In the first phase, all the information and
data needed to estimate resources were collected. The
construction project schedule using the estimated resources
was prepared in the form of Gantt chart and resources required
for each activity are tabulated. The peak units required for a
project day by day are shown in Resource histograms.

In second phase, the actual resources available for the
project were analyzed by Resource leveling with increased
duration. The time-cost implications have been analyzed to
alert the management.

III. PROJ ECT ATTRIBUTES
Project attributes presents the details of an ongoing project
in terms of project schedule, manpower required for different
activities to carryout resource constrained analysis. The costs
incurred in the project are also presented.

A. Project Details
Name of the project : Construction of Commercial Building
Built up area : 47700 Sq ft
Number of Storeys : Ground +Five Floors
Floor to Floor height : 3.35m
Height of Plinth : 0.50 m above Ground Level
Depth of Foundation : 1.50 m below Ground Level.
External Walls : 250 mm thick including plaster
Internal Walls : 150 mm thick including plaster
Parapet Walls : 250 mm thick including plaster

B. Preparation of Estimates
Generally, for resource constrained analysis the man power
requirements for various activities are very essential and these
are to be calculated based on the quantities. These quantities
required for man power study are calculated from the
drawings.

C. Manpower Required
Manpower output is the output quantity i.e., the quantity of
work which can be done per day per person considering all
safety and quality measures as required by client. This was
calculated based on the [2] and [12] and also considering
views based on the experiences and thorough technical
knowledge of many project managers, architects, engineers
and many contractors who are experts and have been working
in this field for many years. Some of the output constants for
various types of activities are shown in Table I and Table II.
The study is limited to these activities only under normal
working and site conditions.
TABLE I. MANPOWER OUTPUT CONSTANTS FOR DIFFERENT LABOURS AS
PER IS: 7272 (PART I 1974)
Activity
Labour output
per day
1. Unskilled (incl. Excavation, transportation)
- Excavation
- PCC and Concrete

1.5 M
3

0.2 M
3
2. Carpenters (for all activities) 6.0 M
2

3. Barbenders (for all activities) (incl. Cutting,
bending, fabrication, transportation etc.,)
0.2 MT
4. Masons (includes shifting of materials within
the site, wetting in water and dressing in SSM)
- Size stone masonry
- Block Masonry
- Plastering

0.9 M
3
6.0 M
2

6.0 M
2

8.0 M
2

5. Painters (incl. Preparatory works as required) 10.0 M
2


TABLE II. MANPOWER REQUIRED FOR VARIOUS WORKS AS PER CPWD
ANALYSIS OF RATES
Activity
Per
Unit
Mason Bhisti Beldar
Plain Cement Concrete
(PCC)
1 Cum 0.1 0.7 1.63
Barbending work 1 Ton 7.5 - 10
Shuttering work 4 Sqm 1 - 1
Reinforced Cement
Concrete (RCC)
1 Cum 0.17 0.9 2
Masonry work 1 Cum 0.72 0.217 1.56
Plastering work 10 Sqm 0.67 0.93 0.86
Painting work 10 Sqm 0.54 - 0.54

D. Project Scheduling
The schedule contains different types of activities with
different durations based on their nature of work and
quantities calculated from drawings. From these quantities,
man power required for various activities are calculated.
Based on the quantities, manpower required and realistic
durations in the current situations are taken in to account and
durations are calculated. Based on the data obtained, network
diagram is prepared and relations are assigned to the activities
to calculate the critical path. Finally the total duration of the
project is calculated by Primavera. After preparing the
IRACST Engineering Science and Technology: An International Journal (ESTIJ), ISSN: 2250-3498,
Vol.2, No. 4, August 2012
662
schedule in Primavera software the total project duration is
estimated as 507 working days (includes inception stage to
completion stages).

E. Project Cost
The total cost of the project has been divided into two types
namely, direct cost and indirect cost. Direct project costs are
those expenditures, which are directly chargeable to and can
be identified specifically with the activities of the project.
These include labour cost, material cost, equipment cost,
transportation cost etc. Direct Cost of the present Project
is Rs. 41,176,035. The relation between time and cumulative
direct cost is shown in Figure 1.




Figure 1. Duration (Months) Vs Cumulative direct cost (Rs)
Indirect costs on a project are those expenditures, which
cannot be clearly allocated to the individual activities of a
project, but are assessed as whole. The indirect cost includes
the expenditure related to administrative and establishment
charges, overhead, supervision, expenditure on a central store
organization, loss of profit, loss of revenue, penalty etc. In this
project indirect cost is taken as 10% of direct cost. Indirect
Cost of the present Project is Rs. 41, 176, 03. So the total cost
of project is Rs. 4, 52, 936, 39.

IV. RESOURCE CONSTRAINED ANALYSIS
In Resource Constrained Analysis an attempt has been
made to generate resource histograms based on the manpower
required for different activities. From the project schedule it is
observed that, almost all the activities are critical except
finishing works (Total float zero or minimum). Hence, any
resource leveling needs to be achieved by enhancing the
duration of the project under constrained resources. In view of
this constraint, presuming that management allows the
increase in the project duration, implications on project costs
have been analyzed by increasing the project duration.

A. Procedure Adopted for Resource Leveling

1. The peak and low demands have been identified in
resource histograms for Masons, Barbenders, Painters
and Unskilled helpers for different days. These values
have been obtained from resource histograms.
2. In order to illustrate the resource leveling procedure
adopted in this study, only data and procedure
pertaining to masons has been presented as an
example.
3. In masons histogram the peak units in a day were 31
(and total project duration was 507 days) with a total
man power units of 4920.5. The man power units are
taken as fixed units.
The three main parameters required to compute total
man-hours are total duration, peak units, and total
number of masons.
Total duration for masons =Adding all individual
durations of Activities involving masons namely,
(Activity 1030, 1050, 1060, 1080 etc.)
=461 days
Peak units = The maximum resources in any day.
=31 numbers
Total masons for activities = Sum of all the
individual resources of each Activity if
corresponding duration
=activity 1030 =1.64 numbers
=activity 1050 =81 numbers
Similarly, cumulative of all mason activities =4920.5
numbers
Total man-hours for masons = Total carpenters for
all activities X 8 hrs/day
=4920.5 x 8 hrs/day
=39,364 hours
4. It can be observed that there was no over allocation in
the histogram when 31 units were assigned for
activities duration as per the original schedule.
5. In the first trial, assuming resource constraints for
masons were reduced to 10% i.e., 27.9 masons were
considered to be available. In these trails total masons
required is taken as constant i.e. 4920.5 numbers,
when change has been effected in from 31 to 27.9
units.
6. The reduction in peak units attempted for different
activities namely, masons, bar benders, unskilled
helpers and painters are shown in Tables III to VI.
7. In the project schedule substructure, superstructure
and finishing work for 5th floor activities are critical.
IRACST Engineering Science and Technology: An International Journal (ESTIJ), ISSN: 2250-3498,
Vol.2, No. 4, August 2012
663
8. For the above activities, the over allocation has been
reduced by increasing duration without changing the
man-hours.
9. However, in the above case overall man-hours
allocated remained the same for completion of the
activity and the duration was evenly distributed for all
activities in all days.
10. The increased duration of masons and total project
duration corresponding to resource constraints (peak
units) is shown in Table III.
Total duration for masons =Adding all individual
durations of Activities involving masons namely,
(Activity 1030, 1050, 1060, 1080 etc)
=469 days
11. Similarly, the procedure was carried out for
barbenders, masons, painters and unskilled helpers.
Details have been presented in Table III to VI
respectively.
12. The effected change in all the resources namely
masons, barbenders, unskilled helpers, and painters
were reflected in the main schedule.
13. It was observed that the total project duration was
increased to 515 days, with the same total man-hours
for all the different activities.
14. The same procedure was carried out for masons, bar
benders, unskilled helpers and painters for another 4
trials reducing resources as shown in Tables III, IV,
V and VI respectively.
15. The reduction in resources of different activities has
resulted in increase in total project duration from 507
days to 515, 518, 538, 566 and 620 days respectively.
The cost implication for increased durations is shown
in Figure 6.
B. Decreased resource constraints for different trials
The decreased resource constraints for masons, bar
benders, unskilled helpers and painters of different trials are
shown in Tables. The Figure 5 shows decrease in resource
constraints to the % increase in project duration.
TABLE III. CHANGE IN MASONS DURATION FOR DIFFERENT RESOURCE
CONSTRAINTS
Resource
Constraints
31 27.9 24.8 21.7 18.6 15.5
Duration for
Masons
461 469 472 492 520 574
Total
Increased
duration
507 515 518 538 566 620

Figure 2. % Decrease in Resource Constraints Vs % Increase in Masons
duration
TABLE IV. CHANGE IN BARBENDERS DURATION FOR DIFFERENT
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
Resource
Constraints
15 13.5 12 10.5 9 7.5
Duration for
Barbenders
306 314 317 326 332 348
Total
Increased
duration
507 515 518 538 566 620

Figure 3. % Decrease in Resource Constraints Vs % Increase in Barbenders
duration
TABLE V. CHANGE IN UNSKILLED HELPERS DURATION FOR DIFFERENT
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
Resource
Constraints
143 128.7 114.4 100.1 85.8 71.5
Duration for
Unskilled
Helpers
505 513 516 536 564 618
Total
Increased
duration
507 515 518 538 566 620
IRACST Engineering Science and Technology: An International Journal (ESTIJ), ISSN: 2250-3498,
Vol.2, No. 4, August 2012
664

Figure 4. % Decrease in Resource Constraints Vs % Increase in Unskilled
Helpers duration
TABLE VI. CHANGE IN PAINTERS DURATION FOR DIFFERENT RESOURCE
CONSTRAINTS
Resource
Constraints
35 31.5 28 24.5 21 17.5
Duration for
Painters
25 25 25 25 25 25
Total
Increased
duration
507 515 518 538 566 620


Figure 5. % Decrease in Resource Constraints Vs % Increase in Unskilled
duration
C. Cost for increased durations

The Cost for the increased durations is shown in Table VII
and is obtained as shown below.
Total Indirect cost =Rs. 4117603.5
Average Indirect cost per month =Rs. 205880.17
Indirect per day =Rs. 6862.67





TABLE VII. COST FOR THE INCREASED DURATIONS
Increased
Duration in days
Increased cost in Rs. % increase in cost
507 45293639 0
515 45348540 0.121
518 45424029 0.167
538 45636772 0.468
566 46041670 0.887
620 46817152 1.684


Figure 6. Cost for the increased durations
V. CONCLUSIONS
The nature of the construction industry is unique in
characterized by complex deployment pattern of resources
resulting in risk and uncertainty inherent in every phase of the
project life cycle. In fact a state-of-the art resource
management is essential for a construction project to succeed
in fulfilling its project objectives. Allocation of resources for
activities is necessary in construction domain to complete the
project within the scheduled time. Resource leveling is needed
in construction projects to avoid the difficulties associated
with the large variations in resource usage.

The paper presents a project schedule with time constrained
due to the clients requirement. All the activities of the
schedule are critical (total float zero). The only option to
increase schedule time is possible by resource leveling.

The resource type for this schedule is considered manpower
(labour) only. The presented schedule increases the day by day
cost due to sudden requirement of labour and hence, this result
has an impact on the overall project cost and the cost is very
steep. If the resource constraints are decreased about 10% to
50%, it causes the total duration of project to increase about
2% to 18.23 %.

For the decrease in the resource constraints, it is observed
that there is an increase in duration for resources namely
masons, barbenders and unskilled helpers by 19.7%, 12.07%
& 18.28% respectively. But there is no increase in duration of
painters because it is an independent activity in total project.
The increased duration results in increase in the indirect cost
IRACST Engineering Science and Technology: An International Journal (ESTIJ), ISSN: 2250-3498,
Vol.2, No. 4, August 2012
665
of the project and finally enhances the total project cost. The
percentage increase in duration is about 18.23% causing
percentage increase in project cost about 1.684%.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors are indebted to Mr. A. Kameshwarao,
Senior Manager in Abir Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. and
Ms. M. G. Prasanna, Assistant Engineer in Andhra Pradesh
Municipal Department for providing real time data of the
project in the pursuit of this case study. The authors would like
to thank Mr. Bogale Tessama at the Adama science and
Technology University for his English language editing.
REFERENCES

[1] Dho Heon J un, Ph.D.1 and Khaled El-Raye - Multiobjective
Optimization of Resource Leveling and Allocation during Construction
Scheduling ASCE, J ournal of Construction Engineering and
Management, Vol. 137, No. 12, December 1, 2011.
[2] Central Public Work Department, Analysis of Rates 2010, Published by
Director General (Works) CPWD, New Delhi.
[3] Khaled El-Rayes and Dho Heon - Optimizing Resource Leveling in
Construction Projects, J ournal of Construction Engineering and
Management ASCE, Vol. 135, No. 11, November 1, 2009.
[4] Users Guide for Primavera Project 2009.
[5] J onathan J ingsheng Shi, and Daniel W. Halpin, Enterprise Resource
Planning for Construction Business management, J ournal ofConstruction
Engineering and Management ASCE, Vol. 129, No. 2, April 1, 2003.
[6] Ming Lu and Heng Li, Resource Activity Critical Path Method for
Construction Planning, J ournal of Construction Engineering and
Management ASCE, Vol. 129, No. 4, August 1, 2003.
[7] D.K.H. Chua, M. ASCE, and M. Li, Resource Interacted Simulation
Modeling in J ournal of Construction Engineering and Management
ASCE, Vol. 128, No. 3, J une 1, 2002.
[8] Sou Sen Leu and Tzung Heng Hung, An Optimal Construction
Leveling and Scheduling Simulation Model, Can. J . Civ. Eng. Vol. 29,
2002.
[9] S.Seetharaman, Construction Engineering and Management, Umesh
Publications, First Edition, 1997
[10] Tarek Hegazy - Optimization Of Resource Allocation and Leveling
Using Genetic Algorithms, J ournal of Construction Engineering and
Management ASCE, Vol. 125, No.3, May/J une, 1999.
[11] Said M. Easa - Resource Leveling In Construction By Optimization,
J ournal of Construction Engineering and Management ASCE, Vol.
115, No. 2, J une, 1989.
[12] Indian Standard Recommendations for Labour output Constants for
Building Work, IS : 7272 (Part I) 1974.

AUTHORS PROFILE
First Author
Name: Shaik Nagaraju
Designation: Lecturer in Department of Civil Engineering
University: Adama Science and Technology University (ASTU),
Adama, Ethiopia.
E-mail I.D: sknagaraju.ce@gmail.com
Mobile No: +251-926654367.

Second Author
Name: B. Sivakonda Reddy
Designation: Assistant Professor in Department of Civil Engineering
University: J NTUH College of Engineering, Hyderabad
Andhra Pradesh, India.
E-mail I.D: bskreddy_246@yahoo.com
Mobile No: +91-9392029625.

Third Author
Name: A.Ray Chaudhuri
Designation: Professor in Department of Civil Engineering
University: Adama Science and Technology University (ASTU),
Adama, Ethiopia.
E-mail I.D: amroyc@gmail.com
Mobile No: +251-931288204.