"##$ "%&'() was produced by Lhe n? CL lood Labellng Campalgn, whlch lncludes Lhe followlng groups on lLs SLeerlng CommlLLee: Consumers unlon, lood & WaLer WaLch, CMC lree n?, Cood 8oy Crganlcs, naLural 8esources uefense Councll, new ?ork ubllc lnLeresL 8esearch Croup lund, norLheasL Crganlc larmlng AssoclaLlon of new ?ork, and Lhe Slerra Club ALlanLlc ChapLer.
lor more lnformaLlon, go Lo: '((*+,,&-#./0012310(,12&045604%1&75-*5%&13'(-4.
1he lssue of wheLher foods conLalnlng geneLlcally modlfled organlsms (CMCs) should be labeled has been hoLly conLesLed ln sLaLe leglslaLures and balloL booLhs across Lhe counLry. uesplLe polls showlng sLrong publlc supporL for consumers' rlghL Lo know, balloL lnlLlaLlves ln WashlngLon and Callfornla falled afLer lndusLry opponenLs ouLspenL labellng advocaLes by wlde marglns. 8ecenLly, however, Lhe sLaLes of Malne, ConnecLlcuL, and vermonL have passed leglslaLlon requlrlng CMC foods Lo be labeled.
ln new ?ork, a CMC food labellng blll has been lnLroduced by Assemblymember Llnda 8osenLhal and SenaLor kenneLh Lavalle (A.3323/S.3833). 1he blll flrsL reached Lhe agenda of Lhe Assembly Consumer Affalrs and roLecLlon CommlLLee ln !une 2013, where lL was narrowly defeaLed afLer lnLense lndusLry lobbylng. As of Lhls wrlLlng, Lhe blll has been reporLed ouL of Lwo Assembly commlLLees, Consumer Affalrs and Codes, and ls awalLlng movemenL by Lhe Assembly Ways and Means CommlLLee and a declslon by Assembly leadershlp Lo brlng lL Lo Lhe floor for a voLe by Lhe enLlre Assembly.
C("1("2'D
CpponenLs of CMC food labellng leglslaLlon conLrlbuLed more Lhan $460,000 ln campalgn donaLlons ln 2013. A ma[orlLy of Lhese campalgn dollars (60) orlglnaLed ouLslde of new ?ork SLaLe. no campalgn conLrlbuLlons were made by groups publlcly supporLlng Lhe blll.
CpponenLs of CMC food labellng leglslaLlon spenL over $3.2 mllllon lobbylng new ?ork pollcymakers ln 2013, ouLspendlng supporLers by nearly 7 Lo 1.
lourLeen buslness groups LhaL have reporLed lobbylng on A.3323/S.3833 conLrlbuLed Lo sLaLe- level pollLlcal parLles and candldaLes ln 2013. Whlle lobby reporLs do noL requlre fllers Lo ldenLlfy Lhelr poslLlons, each of Lhem has been ldenLlfled as an opponenL Lo all or parL of Lhls leglslaLlon based on publlc records ln new ?ork or a poslLlon Laken on slmllar proposals elsewhere ln Lhe unlLed SLaLes.
no groups LhaL have publlcly supporLed CMC labellng made campalgn conLrlbuLlons ln 2013.
CLher companles LhaL have opposed CMC labellng ln oLher sLaLes buL have noL yeL reporLed lobbylng on lL ln new ?ork were also heavy campalgn conLrlbuLors. lor example, epslco conLrlbuLed $94,391.03 Lo sLaLe-level pollLlclans and parLy commlLLees.
I0-(/(0", !F)9", new ?ork SLaLe uemocraLlc CommlLLee (Pousekeeplng) $120,000.00 Andrew Cuomo 2014, lnc. $40,623.00 n?S SenaLe 8epubllcan Campalgn CommlLLee - Pousekeeplng $37,099.80 n?S SenaLe 8epubllcan Campalgn CommlLLee $24,300.00 !eff kleln for new ?ork $19,730.00 1he luC lnlLlaLlve (lndependenL uemocraLlc Conference) $17,000.00 n?S uemocraLlc SenaLe Campalgn CommlLLee (n?S uSCC) $11,230.00 8epubllcan Assembly Campalgn CommlLLee $9,040.00 lrlends for Lhe LlecLlon of uean Skelos $8,300.00 valesky for SenaLe $6,700.00
1here does seem Lo be some correlaLlon beLween campalgn conLrlbuLlons and a leglslaLor's wllllngness Lo oppose Lhe blll. lor example, former Assemblymember uennls Cabryszak, a uemocraL on Lhe Assembly Consumer Affalrs and roLecLlon CommlLLee, recelved checks from slx dlfferenL opponenLs of Lhe blll ln 2013, a LoLal LhaL placed hlm ln a Lle for Lhe mosL number of checks recelved by an lndlvldual member of hls conference. ln !une 2013, he voLed agalnsL A.3323 ln commlLLee, alLhough he had been a co-sponsor. As a resulL, Lhe blll was effecLlvely kllled for Lhe year.
8oLh groups LhaL supporL A.3323/S.3833 and groups LhaL are opposed reporLed lobbylng expenses ln 2013. Croups are noL requlred Lo reporL how much Lhey spend lobbylng on a parLlcular measure. 1hus, below lncludes Lhe aggregaLe amounL spenL on lobbylng by Lhose organlzaLlons whlch dlsclosed LhaL Lhey were advocaLlng on Lhe leglslaLlon. As seen below, groups LhaL oppose A.3323/S.3833 spenL nearly )+?+. Llmes more money lobbylng new ?ork lawmakers ln 2013 Lhan Lhe blll's supporLers:
Several of Lhe groups LhaL have opposed CMC labellng ln new ?ork have a long hlsLory of spendlng masslve amounLs of money Lo defeaL leglslaLlon. 1he Amerlcan 8everage AssoclaLlon, whlch ls composed of some of Lhe companles ldenLlfled above, such as Coca-Cola and krafL loods, ran Lhe second-largesL lobbylng campalgn ln new ?ork SLaLe hlsLory ln a successful aLLempL Lo defeaL former Covernor aLerson's proposed soda Lax ln 2010.
;:)9/ J),$% ClLlzens Campalgn for Lhe LnvlronmenL $139,239.00 ubllc lnLeresL 8esearch Croup (n?) $98,949.00 lood & WaLer WaLch $68,320.00 Slerra Club ALlanLlc ChapLer $60,636.00 naLural 8esources uefense Councll $33,316.00 Punger AcLlon neLwork of new ?ork SLaLe $13,407.00 Worklng AsseLs lundlng Servlce, lnc. $11,384.00 Consumers unlon of u.S., lnc. $4,487.00 !22:02$,0 =)77&("2 ./0"1("2 7& ;<8 =$70%("2 .9//):,0:' $472,178.00
llve organlzaLlons menLloned A.3323/S.3833 ln Lhelr 2013 lobby or cllenL reporLs, buL we were noL able Lo flnd any evldence of a poslLlon for or agalnsL Lhe blll or slmllar leglslaLlon. 1wo of Lhese organlzaLlons, n?Su1 and Lhe rofesslonal SLaff Congress, conflrmed LhaL Lhey had no poslLlon on Lhe blll. We were unable Lo conflrm Lhe poslLlons of Lhe oLher Lhree enLlLles:
1hls reporL relled on lobbylsL and lobby cllenL daLabases provlded by Lhe !olnL Commlsslon on ubllc LLhlcs Lo ldenLlfy whlch enLlLles reporLed lobbylng on elLher A.3323 or S.3833 ln 2013 or 2014 and Lhelr lobby cllenL daLabase Lo LabulaLe Lhelr lobbylng expenses for 2013. ln order Lo deLermlne Lhe poslLlons Lhe varlous enLlLles held on Lhe blll, we revlewed leglslaLlve memoranda submlLLed ln new ?ork SLaLe, sLaLe records from recenL balloL lnlLlaLlves ln Callfornla and WashlngLon, and oLher sources, such as LesLlmony, annual reporLs, and webslLes. ln a few lnsLances, we conflrmed poslLlons wlLh represenLaLlves from Lhe organlzaLlons lncluded.
We cross-checked Lhe llsL of enLlLles LhaL reporLed lobbylng on Lhe blll ln new ?ork SLaLe wlLh Lhe 8oard of LlecLlons' campalgn flnance daLabase Lo LabulaLe campalgn conLrlbuLlons made Lo new ?ork sLaLe-level lawmakers and pollLlcal parLy accounLs ln 2013. ln some lnsLances, we comblned records when conLrlbuLlons were made or lobbylng was performed by clearly- assoclaLed enLlLles or subsldlarles of one corporaLlon. n?l8C conducLed Lhe daLa LabulaLlon and analysls.
E)"-%9'()"
CpponenLs Lo CMC labellng leglslaLlon ln new ?ork, lncludlng ma[or chemlcal companles, food and beverage corporaLlons, reLallers, and agrlbuslness, dramaLlcally ouLspenL supporLers of Lhls leglslaLlon ln 2013. Slnce 2013 was Lhe flrsL Llme Lhere was leglslaLlve acLlvlLy on Lhls blll ln new ?ork, we expecL Lhe numbers wlll lncrease ln Lhe fuLure.