Mining, waste is growing problem both physical accumulation and increasing toxic uncertainties it presents to the mining industry. This paper presents a concept in Waste Design by which toxic mining waste not only can be rendered inert but also act as nutrient to help balance the ecosystems. This concept calls for extractive industries to pursue EQUILIBRIUM with nature (geomimic)
Mining, waste is growing problem both physical accumulation and increasing toxic uncertainties it presents to the mining industry. This paper presents a concept in Waste Design by which toxic mining waste not only can be rendered inert but also act as nutrient to help balance the ecosystems. This concept calls for extractive industries to pursue EQUILIBRIUM with nature (geomimic)
Mining, waste is growing problem both physical accumulation and increasing toxic uncertainties it presents to the mining industry. This paper presents a concept in Waste Design by which toxic mining waste not only can be rendered inert but also act as nutrient to help balance the ecosystems. This concept calls for extractive industries to pursue EQUILIBRIUM with nature (geomimic)
ABSTRACT Mining, waste is growing problem both physical accumulation and increasing toxic uncertainties it presents in the long run. Its value zero is strictly calculated by economy. This mining model begs the question: What is the value of waste & what does it represent to the mining industry? Waste is widely accepted as a by product generated as a consequences of the mining process. The abundant waste accumulation affects society, as receptor, in many ways and the waste piles of materials has no use and no destiny. In reality, this waste is monument of imperfection of the extractive industries worldwide. Our planet is finite and has strict limitations, which mining has traditionally ignored. It is time to design a new system, in which clearly, waste design must be integrated in whole mining process; it has no room to postpone. This paper presents a concept in waste design by which toxic mining waste not only can be rendered inert but also act as nutrient to help balance the ecosystems. This concept calls for extractive industries to pursue EQUILIBRIUM with nature (Geomimic). Also, this concept offers countless gains and opportunities fro the industry and by converting liabilities into assets; mining engineers become the managers and stewards of nature. Also, waste design offers new solutions for proper and sustainable waste management of the mining industry. Keywords: Equilibrium of Nature, Geomimic, Manager of Nature, Sustainable Waste Management, Waste Design. PREFACE It is necessary to clarify two aspects of this proposal. First, the title, Waste Design might be confusing to some people that it may read that the real objective in mining is the waste rather than ore. We design and establish processes that treat ore in order to achieve higher concentrations. Mining is an activity of accumulation of metals of no abundance from low concentration to higher concentration of it. Lately, the market has high prices of metals that allow extraction even of lower grade of metal deposits. Likewise, the ore always abandons the mining area, but it is the waste staying in the mining area that expresses the imperfection of the process to the concern of society. This characteristic of the mining process makes waste the main issue for mining engineering because it represents many future impacts, as well as potential impacts in the short and long term. Moreover, wastes are constantly accumulating around the mining areas without being addressed as an important issue. Therefore, it demands immediate restoration to satisfy nature and society. In reality, nothing in this planet is waste; otherwise, waste would not exist. The message is clear to interpret as nature does there is no waste. The presumption to classify material as waste over diminishes the know how of nature. Second, it is necessary to design waste because the ore (metal or mineral) always leaves the mining area whereas waste stays and loudly demands stability in nature. That depicts how imperfect the mining process is and how it has become a major concern for the environment and for society. Having ignored the loud demands of waste for so long, it is remarkable that we design a process that takes care; the ore under many circumstances of volume and grade, but the main concern is the waste. We do not design anything that will give remediation by design to the cause of well-founded liabilities in claims all over the world against mining. We allow waste, the materials of extraction, to accumulate and stay in piles, which are to this monument dichotomy in the mining industry. As mining engineers, we have the responsibility to confront challenges of these times. We raise the proposal that appropriate design of mining waste will minimize its impact on the ecosystem. These are reasons enough to present this paper. CONTENTS: Introduction Background Importance of Waste Design Benefits and Challenges of designing Waste in Mining Objective of design Model of Waste Design Discussions Conclusion INTRODUCTION Mining is an important and vital activity to society in order to maintain civilization. The wastes it creates speak loud and clear to what is and is not going on in mining. The situation of mining around the world is critical and has to be dealt with through the strictest regulation and standards; thousands of liabilities exist that were generated by mining. In todays business, we still do not have a clean technology that figures out how to turn those liabilities into assets. At the end of the day, catastrophic mining impacts are associated with this large volume of material waste in any given mining area. We are disturbing our planet and we need different tools to restore its balance. Those disturbances remit only negative impacts back to nature. Here is a proposal that covers the relevance to these issues. The problem with mining liabilities is the dangerous effects produced throughout time, not only to humans but also to nature. It denies many other good projects in the future due to its orientation in different goals rather than natures values. Mining to this day functions and continues to persist in the traditional mindset, which expresses and imposes its behavior and adaptation in the wrong time. It looks like we forgot to change our new calendar. The traditional business model is not immersed in todays values, that is, it is confronted with contradictions. This anthropogenic activity presents disequilibrium in nature. Therefore, it requires a balance and different objectives than it is used to. The solution still remains in the proposal that we present in this research paper. We must create clean technology thinking in long-term effects, that is a key definer of mine operation. Thinking in the mindset proposed resides in the effect to act according to the causes, which gives the trust in equilibrium for the disturbance of nature. In reality, wastes are an expression of inefficiency and imperfection in the application of any human technology. In mining, waste is originated by the cut-off grade, which discriminates ore or minerals (mineral with economical values assigned) and waste (others minerals with presumed non-economical value are rejected). The amount of waste is an indicator or measurement of performance. Waste is an announcement of the imperfect process in use. Therefore, mining projects must start to design its waste as priority to minimize impacts in nature. Currently, we do not have a process that takes care of the waste. With a proper design of waste also, we are able to fix the destiny of the waste in accumulation and expose it to different conditions not dissimilar from what it was prior to mining. Through this paper, we will SME Annual Meeting Feb. 27-Mar. 02, 2011, Denver, CO
2 Copyright 2011 by SME Figure 1. Mining Cycle. the definition of waste is determined by its economi
Figure 2. Generation of Waste. n of acid rock from mining waste was public present the importance and know how to design waste in order to offer a more efficient style of mining for the future generation of miners. BACKGROUND The mining industry employs an economic framework where profitability is the objective rather than the consequence of the exercise and the practice. It presents a conflict in objectives when we compare it to natures values. Mining activity generates disequilibrium in nature, present and past. The disequilibrium damages ecosystems as well as human health because mining disturbs geological formations that took millions of years to form and is then disturbed in an extremely short time of human lifespan. Mining defines waste to mean any material without economical value and is rejected. In the process of piling waste, not only do we destroy pre-existing geological formations, but we also create a new substance, which is exposed to unfamiliar conditions. As soon as this disturbance happens the physical, chemical, and biological properties are changed and show up later on as contamination in water, air, and soil. As we explained, the disequilibrium in nature is notoriously expressed in the accumulation of by-products without a future use. This large accumulation and the potential to generate negative effects is a huge concern to society as the main receptor of these effects. In reviewing many ecological disasters, which have occurred in mining, we find of the many of pre- conditions of those disasters, none are necessarily attributable to the technology but are attributable to the style of management. Knowing the result of this type of management of waste (or lack thereof) invites society to decide that many strict regulations should be applied to mining, which impedes mining operations. Today, we are debating mining and its vitality, which is also subject to a long discussion within society because of the style of life that society is immersed in. Mainly, the negative effects of those accumulations insert a big compromise to society about unpredicted conditions in future time. Society is highly concerned for its welfare, as a main receptor of this imbalance in nature is by mining. In the analysis and evaluation of many ecological disasters in mining, the reviews found that those accidents have a common cause not only in the technology but also as being a product of the management style in place (human error). With this mining background, society must determine the stricter regulations than before, as prevention of those proven disasters, including the disaster of a five-month oil spill in the ocean, by British Petroleum in April 2010. The oil spill was due to human error in its management type, as a result of a flow of oil from nature lacking any human control. Also the accident in Chile, San Jose Gold and Copper Mine (August 05,2010), where the mining company declares that they do not have the budget to rescue 33 miners from underground more than 350 meters. The company was leaning on going bankrupt because the drilling rescue was so expensive. After the media exposure the Chilean government stepped in to bail out San Jose Gold & Copper Mine. These are proven concerns to the society in order to stipulate more regulations and stricter standards during mining operations. Many mining projects have been scrutinized by the communities and were rejected such as Tambo Grande Mining Project in Peru, though those communities had no education of appropriate mining techniques or studies of environmental impacts. The facts are impossible to refute at this time. In consequence, mining is dealing with scenarios that make mining a SOCIAL ISSUE. See the graph (Fig 1), it explains the mining cycle attributing the remediation as the first stage in mining.
In the human view, c value. Waste in mining starts from the concept of cutoff grade and continues all the way until the presentation of metal. In this definition, waste only knows addition of material without subtraction, and it starts in the waste rock, the tailing, and unrecoverable economic sulfide minerals (minerals of low-grade to cut-off) that have left the mining area. It is important to note that the orebody is a polimetallic and it contains sulfides, which potentially will generate (ARD) Acid Rock Drainage. Polimetallic is becoming the main source of acidic drainage when it is exposed to oxygen and water. Water becomes an essential indicator of the disturbance because its characteristic is to shape different ecosystems revealing hazards when it flows through. Although we still do not know much about water as a source of energy and other characteristics that are difficult to easily explain (lighting {two clouds of H2O vapor}, penetration of light, penetration of bullet, nano behaviors (Gerald Pollack, 2009), water plays a crucial role to research as an indicator of restoration of nature. The constant disequilibrium in nature relates to imbalance in water, mass, energy, and pollutants (ARD) that are the expression of its position to the respect of natures laws. The production and accumulation of liabilities are not new to mining because mining extracts a low concentration of metals from a large movement of earth, with a large accumulation of waste, emissions of pollutants and disruption of nature with no restoration that represents imperfection in the process. While the orebody may be full of metals, only one metal will be extracted in the majority of cases depending on the type of metal a particular company deals in. The company then limits its self technologically while leaving a trail of useable ore in the waste pile. The richest orebodies were exploited and depleted along time ago. In (Fig.# 2) it shows the generation of waste in mining without geographically limit around the world. Metal Mineral For example: The generatio ized initially by George Agricola in De Re Metallica in 1556, and again in the Handbooks of Mining Engineer by Robert Peele in 1919. It is not a new phenomenon. This is an old issue for mining; even in the Inca mining, before mine exploitation, they first made an inclined labor to find the water level in order to avoid polluting it (Chacana Law, Inca equilibrium law) even though this labor was misunderstood by many that it eventually went to the richest orebody. It was widely recognized for many years without the attention of today by society. It is citable that in the USA, acid rock drainage was well publicized in coal mining of the Appalachian region in the 70s. The chemical process is well NATURE MI NE OPERATI ON CLOSURE FIRST STAGE OF MINING: REMEDIATION REFINERY Mineral CONCENTRATION MINE Tailing Waste Matte, Slag Total = W+ T +S Minimization for less socio-environmental impacts (Waste Design) It happens only add and not subtraction SME Annual Meeting Feb. 27-Mar. 02, 2011, Denver, CO
3 Copyright 2011 by SME established in many publications (Environmental Protection Agency USA, www.epa.gov.us ), but it is remarkable that the oxidation of mineral is heavily dependent on the pH of the waste (rate of oxidation). Initially, the process could start with the pH neutral, but over time the pH slowly decreases, which means an increase in acidity as the pH drops below 4.5 due to the influence of the bacteria activity (Thiobacillus Ferroxidans bacteria) or the role of microorganisms which is primarily associated with the oxidation of sulfide minerals. Moreover, this degeneration of ARD is the result of the activity of oxygen and water combined and also the mining process tends to break the rock into smaller fragments where they present an increasingly open surface of the sulfide mineral to affect its oxidation. The size of the material is important because it directly influences the production of ARD. In the tailing, the size of the material helps to increase tremendously the rate of oxidation to develop acidic conditions in the area. The task of keeping materials with the same characteristics together could be easier, but in the mining process we do not conserve the type of rock as found in the orebody because we mixed it in without any constraint of future reactions. This reflects its consequences in the size of sampling when we extract data of information from those piles. Nevertheless handling the waste in the operation alters its representative data. In summary, the management of waste disposal is fundamentally based on the production of acid and acid consumption reactions that occur with in the pile. In normal mining operations, we aim to be closer to the smelter and to the refinery. We choose to build closer to the mine in order to redu cause its place in business was based on short-term crite e different results for the future of the mining industry. As w The impact s effects in the perception of the rformance of th start it is necessary to stipulate the waste char nd during oper ce the extreme costs of transporting materials farther than is allowable, but this concept is twisted when the customer only wants concentrate minerals (ore plus waste) from another corner of the planet. In spite of that, this practice originates the imbalance of the ecosystems at both ends, except that the market permits this practice. Also, the market only executes one payment for a metal that could be recycled many times (Unique payment for a finite resources). If we contemplate a holistic view of the mining operation, we know this practice is wrong for its adverse effects are in place. The waste as an issue (Concept of property) will always belong to the operators; otherwise the property of minerals is eternal without transferring or stopping their liabilities of the production of metals. Therefore, it is an illusion to think that as soon as mining closes we will be exempt of liabilities. If we consider the seriousness of this condition we must address the operation of business under the highest rules of ethics that should be practiced in all models of business. It is easy to misinterpret this situation, but confronting the same pattern in ecological mining disasters could provide the better picture of the issue in reference. It is not to be so critical of the business as to stop it, but it is necessary to present the case accurately so it can be solved by this enduring generation. Again, the management of all the generation of waste was less understood be ria rather than on its long-term effects. Still our industry is framed in a fragmental linear system and a rigid style of management that does not have the foresight to see the other end as a cause-effect condition (Producer-Market). In analyzing many mining projects in South America, which is geomorphologically as diverse as a wrinkled paper, how can we ask mining companies to promise not to dispose of waste in the river or the valley? Many projects produce wastes that need a place to be piled. Waste, in the traditional sense of mining is: a mineral deposit without a viable waste disposal option is not a viable mine. Then, it is crucial that when we promise not to dump waste into the river, that the viable location for waste be in place at a new mine. This is crucial not only to the company but also to the environment and surrounding communities. It requires creative engineering to solve the storage waste of mining without contaminating the environment. Not to mention the principle of engineering is to adapt technology to nature and never vice-versa. There are many cases that nature is adapted to technology rather than the inverse. Contrary to nature, it is typical to describe that if we are able to have a 500 ton truck capacity we can install it in a mine that was designed for a 100 ton truck and this decision is supported for the volume of production and the rule of thumb that more materials are cheaper to carry at once. The actual system only permits us to see waste as consequences of the business rather than seeing waste also as an objective of the business to have results that minimize impacts in nature, as priority of this activity. Our thinking about waste and how to transform it is a guarantee that we could se aste decomposes uncertainties increase in time. Also, waste has direct influence in the RECONCILIATION OF RESERVES, although many specialists call this inefficiency risks of the business instead of naming it for the real condition: incorrect method in the wrong time. To continue covering and to accept these imperfections in the industry are contradictory to societys demands. It becomes much easier if we focus on nature to provide our hope of an answer to solve uncertainties because we will able to understand natures language for restoration of ecosystems. If we delay this consideration for the laws of nature we will invite the establishment of higher regulations in the business, which will only make it more difficult to deal with the situation later on. Also, there will be a high response about safety and its implementation; still mining is considered one of the most dangerous jobs. By developing better techniques of the management of mining waste, we can establish a system that not only handles proper waste disposal, but also improves mine safety and accounts for HUMAN PROFITABILITY as well. However, the actual mining business is involved in many conditions related to the infinite profit in a limited planet. Society pounds constantly in answer to the question: what is the characteristic of profit? And which model of business is delivered to the next generation? This mindset is similar to the perception that in many cases the human views are more important than reality; as a result, mining is socially involved in a purely bad perception. IMPORTANCE OF WASTE DESIGN s of those mining wastes have imperiou business. We also should evaluate the pe e business by the volume of waste that it generates rather than standards according to economic indicators. Having less ecological footprint guarantees less disturbance during the operation of mining and will implicate higher productivity through consequence. To design the waste requires a holistic view of the mining operation. When we integrate all the consequences in each of the stages of mining, we will be able to count and register the magnitude of waste generation. Therefore, the waste design is a multiplier of efficiency and restorer of nature. The highest importance of the waste design is to mitigate those effects in mining. To acterization. It is a key to develop a design in compliance with the values of nature. Uncontrollable waste generates higher dilution, a big loss of reserves, piles of unwanted material, acid rock mine ADR index, and other unwanted results. The waste characterization is determined with all the physical, chemical, and biological properties specially assessing the acid generation potential and leachability of the waste to the combination of static and kinetic tests. This condition will dictate the features of the design of the waste facility to ensure environmental protection. The waste characterization results are integrated in the type of mining that we establish in the project. Waste is also integrated with the groundwater characterization for expressing the mining performance under appropriate levels of environmental protection. Likewise, the characterization of orebody is a main factor to develop the model of waste. It also would forecast the stability of the waste in time. The analysis of the waste composition is unique to each mine and region and does not have a characteristic of a unique planning of design (one formula fits all). Waste design will integrate the environmental policies, standards, assessment, planning, monitoring, auditing and processes to achieve our final goal of having nature in balance. The design of waste will integrate environmental policies, jobs standards, project assessment, mine planning, monitoring of results, social and environmental auditors and any auditors process that achieves the final objective of mining is to offer to nature, balance, after mining to the next generation. Another importance of waste design is to develop management programs to control the generation of mining waste in a ation, as well as to sustain productivity. To keep this in a more SME Annual Meeting Feb. 27-Mar. 02, 2011, Denver, CO
4 Copyright 2011 by SME on of restoration. As we review in the principles of ARD proper perspective, the mining engineer needs to learn and understand the language of nature. Ecosystems require stabilization of physical, chemical, and biological properties of their components. For example, in order to achieve this balanced condition, we model closed loop systems where we cancel seepage to protect the groundwater. We end up having a framework of the greatest amount of extraction / restoration possible at the same time, and by working under this framework we manage the negative effects which are produced that constitutes what is proper to nature. It is important to reach waste management stability in proper time. The benefit is also extended to preserving the double impacts in two open mines for the same purpose. Having a waste management program will provide evidence of the ethical explanati (www.epa.gov) the exposition of mineral to water and oxygen are the basis of acidic potential generation. For example, air movement is associated to oxygen transport through waste rock dump, which has a potential to enhance the rate of oxidation of pyrite bearing material. Airflow in the waste rock piles can generate ARD. A better understanding of the internal airflow through waste rock pile will minimize ARD and its consequences. Therefore it is necessary to control the mechanics of airflow such as convection, diffusion, fugacity, and barometric pumping; all of these factors are included in the characterization of the waste. Another example is the necessity to define the water balance in the site equally with the evolution and sequence of the waste pile. As a result, less monitoring and mapping are required in the future. In view of the evidencethe complexity of the formation of ARDwe will be able to develop the clean technology that society demands at this time. In addition, we could protect the groundwater through prevention. To control specific conditions such as airflow, water, mineral content, and design we will mitigate the effects of decomposition from one material to another that is unknown. By reducing the airspace utilization factor, we would produce far less accumulation of waste in the mining area. In Fig. # 3 Sequence of Waste Pile.
design reside in the integration should be a prod equilibrium. But, we have to reco s cond ning waste in a complex nature. In the case of ARD forec s about less than 100 years for disturbing millio Figure 3. Sequence of Waste Pile. The important elements of waste of the generation of waste to the whole mining process. It uct of integration under stable conditions of the physical, chemical, and biological properties. Another vital source of mitigation is to change the concept of waste as a constraint factor of the mining operation and in mine closure. To achieve such an accomplishment requires our commitment in innovation and creativity. We cannot forget that creativity is inefficiency because it is not established to satisfy a certain immediate interest of the company. It also does not have a roadmap or recipe to produce useful ideas instantly or to resolve issues immediately. It only comes from knowledge, expertise, understanding, persistence and confidence in proposing different mining techniques for different and new purposes. We can only mine by wisdom. Creativity is an investment in failure that arrives with practical solutions due to its freedom of action to solve mining issues in todays debate, but the solution will only come from the understanding of the language of nature (Geomimic). So, can we avoid a heavy or strict regulation in mining? Yes, of course, if our nature is in harmonious gnize that there are many things in nature we still do not understand. By designing the waste, we could present a specific approach that we could see differently in the business and its regulations. To have less regulation demands a greater characterization and evaluation of the orebody. The main condition of this case is in a preventative policy about the generation of waste site. The characterization of the orebody is met with a specific performance standard in the waste facility. We believe in auto-regulation rather than simple compliance of the established means of regulation. In essence, also here is an opportunity to implement Management by loss in the project. The future will not permit our generation to continue to accumulate mining liabilities as we do now and did in the past, without the adequate attention to it. Finally, the importance of design is to present to nature a stable waste or no waste at all because it will nurture nature. BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES OF DESIGNING WASTE IN MINING The benefits of designing wastes will manifest themselves in the tability of the waste under any external or internal unfavorable itions in nature. So, our priority is to make waste a commodity of value in mining, and to perceive waste as useful material in this new millennium. Much of the mining waste has an industrial use as acidic neutralization, (as captured and sequestration of anthropogenic carbon dioxide), for use as building materials, and many other industrial applications, and also in the extraction of other metals with social interest. One of the main benefits of the waste design in mining is in the ecological benefits to convert liabilities into active assets that include conservation of resources and reduction of the impacts to nature. To attain those benefits, many simple steps are applied to the process of desig asting, for example, we must attend the water and airflow in the waste site to plan the period of oxidation of pyrite bearing ore to determine the index of ARD in the site. By controlling infiltration of water, we will reduce erosion and will have better distribution of surface water, which improves long-term stability. By controlling the air, ARD can be limited and controlled in the design of the site. This purpose in mind is to achieve the stability of the waste during and after mining operation. This design is framed in the replication of nature in the surrounding areas to achieve its own characteristics (Geomimic), remembering that nature is not a juxtaposing of events, but that nature is its own manifestation of an engineered design of interrelationship developed and sealed its own technology for millions of years to perfection. In the piling of waste, some physical considerations such as re-gradient tasks could be less of an issue with a new condition of the sequence of filling the pile. Better planning to develop waste sites for landform evolution could be achieved through better administration of the erosion rate. We do not forget that mining operations are a finite economic activity. Usually its life span i SEQUENCE OF FI LLI N ns of years of formation of those orebodies. This missing link of time is lost in translation by its effects. Those long-term impacts are still being dealt with through the mining activities of many human generations without acceptable results. To achieve the reduction of waste through an efficient energy use in the process is still the challenge of this generation in which we would like to discharge less waste and less possible toxics into the mining area. To this point, it has only a few ways of using wastes in place; mining waste could be used in recycling, or building tiles, or building roads or housing, or extracting other metals from it, but we are still accumulating wastes throughout time without design or having future uses. In reality, there is no justifiable logic or reason for accepting waste as a consequence of the process. When industries claim results of productivity, optimization and efficiency in their performance, several factors were not considered. In Fig # 4 shows when efficiency reaches a maximum point it transpires to become inefficient with different processes under a structure of time. In consequence technology reaches its level of A A F C E B D E B C D F FILLING MINING G WASTE PI LES MINE
PILES LOW ALKALI NE ALKALI NE ACI D SME Annual Meeting Feb. 27-Mar. 02, 2011, Denver, CO
5 Copyright 2011 by SME
Figure 4. Efficiency Cycle. waste design are to have better protocols for an accounting of metal and processing of the reconciliation of the mine reducing the amount of bonding posting. In accordance to the law for mini because a lack of attention for the waste generated by mining is no long important steps: first, We cann The main objecti blish a commitment to natures equilibrium (G g industry. It would repre we incompetence and/or obsolescence to reengineering. Therefore, the main mission of the mining engineer is to take those technologies to its level of incompetence in order to reengineer it. Some of the benefits of /plant, reserves (mass conservation), energy, water, and soils usage in order to avoid the misclassification of ore/waste. Misclassification will result in higher dilution and a higher loss of reserve in tailing. Practically, we create the re-mining in the waste pile as well as in the tailing. Through re-mining, we will achieve the beneficiation of tailing and all of the minerals that are contained within and the pile of waste. If we take into consideration all these factors of waste design, we will no longer have a need for re-mining as an option of recovering values from the mining area. The green image of the industry could be more of a realization than a designation of pursuit. Furthermore, the designation of being green needs to be supported by a different process of new technology in place that includes the recovery of a wide variety of minerals including rare earth elements (REE). The inputs and outputs in mining are not well uniformed or standardized because the quality of their information is not adequate or reliable for balance (ins-outs). The actual mining process is done in a linear transformation of inputs flowing to products rather than to nature and its diversity of relationships in a closed loop to achieve balance. Another benefit of proper waste design is found in drastically ng operation of the state, companies are required to have a performance bond posted (operation guarantee or Social license) in order to assure proper closure of the waste sides. This reduction in the amount of money posted by the company also lowers the cost of the financial instruments that guarantee the monitoring and long-term care of the site after closing. In many states, this period of monitoring varies for more than 40 years in average. Proper waste design will help in the establishment of a comprehensive permitting process in mining licenses. As well, it is remarkable that poverty eradication issues can be involved with the industry if it uses the best practice that mining can offer and if it assumes direct participation with its mining community. The essence of mining in today scenario is not only in the production of metal, but also in the production of relations specifically social relations. Waste design will also contribute to the legal status of the industry er supported. With waste design in place, the actual practices of mining will be dynamically in balance with nature, which is a far better condition than being under the limit of illegal and/or legal status, in spite of which many executives might consider it as management strategy. Now, those strategys enterprise could be abandoned through the proposal of having a waste design as a better alternative of mining in the future. In spite of the legality that creates a temporal socio acceptance, it is necessary and important to insist on motivation for the auto-regulation of the industry as a vision of the future of mining. Knowing its meaning that this temporal acceptance is sustained by the prejudice of society that those temporal acceptance, in reality, impede the fairness of the business. It also immerses an ethical condition and loyalty to nature rather than to a group of humans with an interest in temporal and ephemeral tasks. It is notorious that looking for the legality of the business only gives to society a new makeup of the business itself, but it hides the extended truth about its disequilibrium achieved in nature during and after mining operation. In addition to the above contributions, the waste design also will be helpful to accommodate an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) under the better technology applied. It carries a re-definition of EIA in the same legal frame all over the world. In the search for more benefits, some might ask: How can we avoid more strict regulation in mining? There are two designing our waste, and second, being an auto-regulated and responsive industry. These two steps hold a complete prevention policy during all stages of mining as well as through time. Also, it is necessary to address an answer for the following question: Is your orebody a generator of ARD? This answer is provided through a warning of the production ARD in the long term and the seeping condition of the orebody. Why must we answer this question? ARD is the most serious problem that mining is facing in various degrees of the potential acid production around the world. Mine water is considered to be a waste from the mining works, as well. Wastewater can also be treated to obtain different mineral extraction at the same time. These are urgent risks to minimize in the frame of challenging the industry to present projects that are efficient, effective, and efficacious. In principle, when we minimize the long-term impacts implicitly we maximize potential benefits of the mining projects. The Challenge to develop practical indicators of dangerous environmental and social effects to nature still would persist. ot forget that mines exist within a company to satisfy various main human objectives but do not attend to the objectives of nature. Todays mining business is loaded with full, strict regulations because of its past practices and behaviors. Our focus will be in developing indicators with the characteristics of practical usage in the operation of mines. In addition, the design of waste would attend to the human requirements of the company and also to the legacy that still remains for the next generation of the industry. The legacy of the industry is a mindset, which needs to be changed in actual business practices. Keeping and persisting in doing mining with the same model would be a big disadvantage to this time because it has the same, well-known results of the accumulation of liabilities expected to be mitigated by the next generation of miners. Albert Einstein once said: The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. The future legacy of mining must be different from the present and the past in order to continue mining in the future. That is our mission. OBJECTIVES OF DESIGN ve of waste design is to esta EOMIMIC) by the minin sent an effort to minimize impacts in nature and to make mining more acceptable to society in a unique planet. Having restored the equilibrium in nature will determine our performance for a better planet. Waste design is committed to provide and to protect equilibrium in nature. When this condition is met the mining stability is achieved. If protect nature, it is a logical consequence that that protection extends to humanity (Human Zero Theory). The design of the operation will interact and integrate all objectives into one. The principles of prevention, protection, and conservation will enable effective communication with all hierarchy of any human organization framed with ethics and transparency in the decision process. With proper mine closure in mind, using this method of design will be a key to success in offering an ecological ratio of effective waste/mineral % EFF TECHNOLOGY PROCESS #2 PROCESS #1 PROCESS #3 TIME SME Annual Meeting Feb. 27-Mar. 02, 2011, Denver, CO
6 Copyright 2011 by SME n. It has its roots in the protection of ecosystems, hum First of all, to design we must understand that nature is a dynamic and evol ot to men model to represent reali
Figure 5. Model of Nature. ry complex and requires a magnificent Currently, we are facing the challenge of re sferring and changing of matter and energy. Ther
equi osystem. The design of waste will change the was management. This emergent management principle of mining would be based on waste desig anitys health, and the conservation of resources to the next generation, and afterwards, to establish carefree mining closure. With this mentality, mining can reach the end of production with materials that are totally harmless to nature, and also to use the materials for human purposes. We will also nurture nature in order to close the cycle of effects. Eventually, the goal of waste design is to create a waste design model that mimics nature, this also adds the benefit of protecting humans and enforcing a good healthy environment, while maintaining the material utilization and process to restore equilibrium to nature. MODEL OF WASTE DESIGN develop the model of waste ving system. N tion that earth is a violent planet: earthquakes, hurricanes, typhoons, monsoons, tsunamis, volcanoes, etc. all which will help to establish the identity of this model as inspired by nature just as ancient civilizations in America (Inca, etc.) believed that the Earth is a living planet (Pachamama), and demands our respect. The model of waste design is only a tool to be used in assisting the business decision. It is impossible for the ty; otherwise, the model would be reality itself. We cannot ambitiously and arrogantly design nature because nature has established its own design over the course of millions of years. In Fig. # 5 Shown model of nature. Modeling nature is ve understanding of its language.
plicating a model of nature. Modeling of nature is the application of methods and systems found within nature for the study and design of engineering systems and to convert them into modern technology. The transfer of technology between life forms and synthetic constructs is in accordance to nature; nature is the model and we are inspired by the systems of nature. From this beginning, mining will become different because we cannot release the same results into nature as traditional mining has done in the past by accumulating many social- environmental liabilities. We cannot expect different results by following the same patterns of the past. Developing a model of nature is a challenge and in this order we put numbers (numerizing) to nature. Nature is perceived as what is pure or free from human intervention (mining). Studying nature by modeling techniques is very beneficial because it gives indicators of the effects of mining in the future. Human knowledge of nature is great, but our understanding of nature is very little. Under this concept we must grow not only from a simple accumulation of data, but we must also expand the experience of understanding the language and concepts of nature. In the minds of many, however, complex systems theory is not a new branch of science, but rather a new framework; many researchers consider it to be a new perspective that allows us to see old scientific content in new ways. This new perspective and the methods that it brings to bear have been adopted across a wide array of natural and social sciences. An understanding of complex systems is becoming an essential part of every scientists knowledge and skills. The time has come for these ideas and methods to become a central part of every student of natures learning Again, modeling of nature is a very complex task because there exists a constant tran e are two principles to weigh in this model. First, the criteria of physical, chemical, and biological equilibrium must be in place at any moment in the mining processes. The conservation of mass matter is practically in a closed system in dynamic harmony, and the energy of the earth is nearly in a steady state, keeping in balance constantly. For example, the earth receives energy from the sun and releases an equal amount of energy to space; in the end there is no net gain or loss of energy for the earth. Second, the most important condition is that we only have one earth, which is the only suitable habitat that we have available to us. With those two main conditions in mind, we will be able to develop a model of waste from the viewpoint of nature before the presence of human disturbances. In order to understand the balance of nature, in many cases it is important to understand disequilibrium before you can organize equilibrium. When we pile mining waste, we create practically new substances because we expose existing elements to new variables. This new substance would be included in the model. The model would describe the state of the system at any given time (t+n), and also it is a tool to decide restoration immediately for attending its effects for better environmental management. When we develop this model, those two principles are important because the model will have identity in reality. Mining waste is designed to attend its effects to nature. Practically, we would achieve a mine production totally based on NATURE librium in nature by following the principles of this model. The model is an integrated framework of all processes in place that provides less accumulation, less transportation, adequate transferring, and services in all the stages of mining. Besides that, this model is suited to analyze any scenarios in mining at any time because its flexibility and the dynamic concepts of the model are attended. The propagation of errors and the management of uncertainties will be included in the result of the model. In Fig. #6 Conceptual Model of Contaminant in Nature The appropriate waste design will vary from mine to mine depending of every ec MASS, ENERGY, WATER, SOIL, AIR DIMENSION:
MACRO
MICRO
NANO
TIME
PHYSIC CHEMICAL BIOLOGIC COSMIC te pile operation (sequence of disposition in the waste site) because it presents an emerging approach to the degree of saturation in the waste. We will be able to control the fluid flow and the concentration of coarse and fine material distributed through the waste piling. Air permeability of waste rock can be determined by the response of internal air pressure in response to atmospheric pressure change in the area. Likewise, the diffusion of oxygen is an important factor in order to determine the distribution of oxygen in the waste rock dump. In respect to the leachate flow data, it is founded by the ratio of liquid flow and liquid mass to determine the transport properties through the waste rock dump. Additionally, many other characteristics such as conductivity, energy free (factor of Gibbs), temperature, and pH in the waste are determined to control its specific distribution in the waste pile. These aspects of permeability and reactivity in the waste are important to control the flow fluids and the process of oxidation during the operation of the waste dump. Our thinking is established in the association of nature viewpoints with assumptions to reach the sense of the concept from global to the specific; it is focusing on the dynamic processes of nature with a closed loop system (cause-effects) given to the explanation and the identification of the feedback loops framed in a scheme of checks and balances and their relationship to their effects in nature. EVOLUTION & DYNAMIC BALANCE : EQUILIBRIUM SME Annual Meeting Feb. 27-Mar. 02, 2011, Denver, CO
7 Copyright 2011 by SME
Figure 6. Conceptual Model of Contaminant. In reality, nature is our model. By identifying the component elements that we should include in our model, previously observed from nature, we will be able to build it to represent the system as a useful representation of the system in its common behavior and always in an integrated configuration of this worthwhile effort (Geomimic). The definition of waste design that is proposed represents an incredibly complex system. This model would represent everything in the system and would pursue our choice based on what questions we are able to answer. As a result, the model is always a simplified representation of the system without pretending or giving the illusion to represent reality. The model is validated when its prediction of the system reaches adequate level of mimicking nature. It is remarkable to achieve equilibrium in order to demonstrate the capability and application of the model to the large volume of material. It is always important to consider the know-how of nature in a normal area or region of the proposed mining before the operation begins. The model would consider the following aspects: 1. The size and scale of the project 2. The three-dimensional size of the maximum waste possible on-site. 3. eology (characterization and mineralogy) 4. Geotechnical and Hydrology properties 5. Waste dumps stability 6. Air movement associated with the transport of oxygen through waste rock 7. Aquifer vulnerability (underground water) 8. Storage capability of waste 9. Waste characterization (physical, chemical, and biological) 10. Seismic characteristics 11. Mine Closure 12. Program of facility (abandon and dismantling) 13. Good sources of information 14. Good tools of forecasting effects Mass flow is accounted for in terms of material intensity (minerals moved or range of production) to generate mining waste. This concept would be expressed through any of the following formulas: Dissolution Absorption Volatilization Bioconcentration FATE TRANSPORT PARTITION COEFFICIENT FUGACITY PARTITIONING REACTION KINETICS ADVECTION DISPERSION DIFUSION COMPARTMENTAL Balance of Mass: Output = input + Loss + transformed (mass conservation law) Total Mass in System = (Mass in each phase) {Accumulation/loss of mass} = {Mass input} {Mass output} {Reactions}(+generation-consumption) Change in storage of mass = Mass transported in Mass transported out + Mass Produced by sources Mass eliminated by sinks. The control of volume in waste dump rock is submitted to a rearrangement of the ecosystem by nature with all the generation of different compounds due to exposition to erosion, wind, weather temperature, and rain. The model of design is developed in a close loop waste generation in order to mitigate immediately those negatives impacts in the area; everything would be under the criteria of the values of nature. This model of design will determine physical, chemical, and biological stability in the mine site. It will also determine the cleaner production of minerals without socio-environmental impacts. In the end, the mining will provide practically no liabilities; nature does not allow corruption in a holistic view of the mining operation. In consequence, we would not need regulation or environmental law enforcement; we could aim for a model of mining without regulations. Finally, the model of design in waste is a state of mind for the de-production and de-accumulation of wastes in mining. DISCUSSIONS First, the entire ore body is mined on paper. Mining values reach their limit when its values no longer increase. By nature, the orebody is not monometallic; this model of thinking that the orebody is monometallic in the mining system carries a lot of sources of errors and uncertainties involved with the disposition in the estimation of the cut off grade. The cut off grade discriminates ore and wastes which directly influences the generation of waste. The assumption of the estimation of the cut off grade does not include the environmental and social cost in its calculation in spite of its economic configuration. Likewise, the relation waste/mineral is an important factor to the operation of the mine. Here is an opportunity to develop a sound ratio of ecological waste/mineral. Because this ecoefficient relation of waste/mineral measures mining operation under the principles of nature, this will ensure the health of the environment and will promote less generation of waste. Also, it is necessary to reach an efficient relation of energy/mineral and energy/waste in order to reduce a generation of overall waste; both are indicators to evaluate performances of the mining operation. Therefore, integration of ratios could attend balance in nature for less generation of waste. Each of those ratios vary per each mine because there is no a unique formula for all mining areas. In the traditional mining of today we could develop the sequence of filling the waste pile while attending to its acidic/alkaline factor. In this manner, waste piles are planned to achieve low permeability and limit the influx of water/air in to the waste rock dump (encapsulation implicatively) see Fig.# 4. Moreover, it will be able to control the oxygen that transports into the waste rock piles through diffusion, convection, and barometric pumping. Practically, it would be a rearrangement of the system of accumulation of wastes in piles. This accumulation could be expressed in the Balance of mass = (Solid moved + Solid not use in destination + solid transformed with percentage admitted to every waste dump) (Solid benefit). It is admissible to perform waste audit to keep reserves registered and to achieve a stable rock dump. In Fig. # 7 Water is an Indicator of mining performance. The design of waste would permit to extract all metals from mining including rare earth elements (REE) and those with social interest as well. It will be the full utilization of the mineral resource. It could completely become the extension of the value until the resource SME Annual Meeting Feb. 27-Mar. 02, 2011, Denver, CO
8 Copyright 2011 by SME reaches an inert material for social use and stable material to nature. The definition of by-product in any mining operation must be redefined in a new business model in the industry. The business model does not have the room to hold the concept that there is no profitable use for mining waste. In the past, that definition was convenient to accumulate the least expensive way of disposing of waste in rivers and areas sensible to nature. Also, these old practices describe the common industrial disposal of waste, which are different to the new challenges of this millennium. In pursuing the definition of waste, to nature, all matter is not waste and the cyclical condition of its complex interrelationships of fields makes it a valuable condition. Not to mention that we as humans are living thanks to the waste of the plants (oxygen). The definition of waste is extremely relative due to its scenarios in the human view, which is irrelevant because we are a part of nature. In this paper, it explains to us that using waste until its inert condition of nature, we would understand a nature that reflects its control mechanisms for efficacy, efficiency, and effectivenessall based on the science of nature that still is an unknown to our disposition for comprehensive remediation after mining. These are our challenges as mining engineers.
Figure 7. Hydrologic Cycle. The waste design should not fail to deliver the promises of increased productivity, decreased expenses, decreased waste, highest morale and ethics, and to have an industry with a future and their acceptance to society. In order to compel those promises we establish indicators that determine causes of events prior to its consequences. Here, it appears an important tool to address this issue in the waste design through developing models; in spite of everything, all models are wrong but some are useful (Box 1979). When evaluating the complexity of nature it is hard to consider all the elements and parameters that conserve harmony and dynamic evolution. Moreover, models have limitations due to their errors and uncertainties for the assimilation of the assumptions in it. It is clear from new experiences and testimonies, that if a model is deemed good, with that known reality, which is almost impossible to achieve as nature does, it is only appropriate to replicate it (Geomimic). Effective leadership in mining will provide a comprehensive waste management program in the reduction, re-usage, recycling, and recovery of the resources into action. That is what waste management is all about it. We cannot waste our finite natural resources; otherwise, we could start to ask who is given the right to be a waster or polluter on this planet? The recovery of the element of the resource is not an option of business; it is the business or not the business because in the end, we again are confronting the condemnation of society. Moreover, it will provide less difference in the reconciliation of reserves in the annual exercise, which determines a new policy of RECONCILIATION OF RESERVES. Practically, this old issue about reconciliation was postponed for many decades in the mining industry because some still do not recognize it as an emergency or even as an important issue about our management of finite natural resources. We arrive at a simple turning point whether to design the mining waste or to negotiate the pollutants through trade by environmental effects that it would be integrated; either way we will not have any excuse to postpone this issue any longer. The selection of both ways will present better images of mining to society. In the end, society no matter what and how will pay for those considered externalities without the reflection on environmental policy or lacking of theory of compensation unattended for these conditions. In the majority of cases, this will be typified as anti-mining or fanatic environmentalism, but in reality, those people who classify this model in such a manner are incompetent to accept the new generation of challenges we are facing in an at-risk planet. These issues must be solved now in this generation because the problems belong to us but the earth belongs to all generations. Of course, this new thinking would be supported in the transfer of knowledge and understanding with the concept of ownership in a framework of effective communication to each participant in this proposed model of business. To reiterate, it is necessary to have the full participation of people and the cooperation of companies to improve waste management in mining with new and better ideas for the future. Environmental accountability of companies cannot be subscribed to legal framework in order to force them to accomplish their assignment with nature. Instead of compliance, we need a commitment to nature. This would be in the best interest of the company. Society would not need to enforce it with fines and penalties for those guilty of pollution. Likewise, filling empty courts for this concept would be ineffective. The key point here is that society needs to have a strong commitment to nature, through understanding and education in preservation. These are the key factors we must strive for. Having a legislation to hold polluters accountable is a reality of the wrong sign of operating mines around the world; it only reflects its lack of design and demonstrates our lack of critical thinking. A mere fine or penalty will not deter our cyclical thinking in the pollution we create and produce. This is because in many mining projects the design of wastes is not considered as a part of the mining development process. Also, it would be an opportunity to rectify in many projects that waste design is the only alternative to consider before the sensitivity of ecosystem. Otherwise, the sensitivity of the ecosystem will be assimilated into the design of the project when we design the waste. In Fig. # 8 it is shown the effects of waste design in mining. BALANCE NATURE Control Risks & uncertainties of waste
Figure 8. 8 Effects of Waste Design in Mining. How do we measure moral worth or ethical practices in mining? Regulation is not based on corporate objectives or international standards. Regardless, the mining industry does not need regulations EHS INDEX Better Administrationof Finiteresources Flexible Mine Planning Productivity of Energy Social Value Economy without compromise EHS index DESIGN by EFFECTS HighValue Mineral/ Resources SME Annual Meeting Feb. 27-Mar. 02, 2011, Denver, CO
9 Copyright 2011 by SME when they are determined by equilibrium of nature. The responsibility of managing the generation in pollution must take place at both ends of productionconsumption in order to celebrate a good trade. Considering those effects of trade could provide a compensated quality environment in both ends due to technology, lower taxes, investment incentives, and other economical devices in order to produce minerals for consumption without socio-environmental liabilities. This perception is easy to assimilate when we address the planet under implicit global views. We could cancel international regulation, agreement, treaties and certifications given by biased institutions because we would be restoring equilibrium in nature that has nothing to do with implemented human regulations. Nature is nature. We cannot forget that the air and the earth crust are practically a thin film without going farther to compare our position in the Milky Way galaxy and universe to justify our relevance. Our moral must be reflected in the highest ethics for the respect of natures laws. CONCLUSIONS Mining without a waste design does not have room in this century; otherwise, we cannot carry the concepts of the 20 th century in todays business. Moreover, waste design in mining is the basis of clean technology without socio-environment impacts. Designing the waste in mining is a methodology of designing by effects; the mining plan incorporates a waste design. Otherwise, without waste design is there is no mine planning. The thinking in the long term is not a statement, but rather a condition of action. Innovation and design are rights for the long-term goals in mind. The design of waste will vary from mine to mine depending on the ecosystems involved. Reeducation in the university about the design of waste in mining is necessary because our responsibilities are to acquire our duties without external imposition. The idea of the university to form the good employee would transform into the formation of leaders as managers of nature. (The mining engineer is the manager of nature). Mining cannot have materials without a usage destination. Materials of waste dump, tailing, other materials are MONUMENTS OF IMPERFECTION. This could consolidate under the welfare of nature and humanity. To design the waste in mining we practically redefine the cutoff grade, dilution, and the policy to reconcile reserves in mining. Waste design would be set to implement a better process of reconciliation in reserves losses. Waste design performs the ability to be an industry leader for natures interest. Nothing is sustainable. We have the evidences that the waste management practices applied in the past to mining waste sites have not been successful in preventing severe environmental degradation. We need to build the future different from the past. Its still pending further study to develop a recycling flow of materials to avoid the generation of pollutants which could avoid association with other substances that produce unknown compounds or detrimental subsequent use for its hazardous contents to nature. The design is about ideas to lead to the right answer and give the right solution for mining problems. All of those ideas are transferable to management because they are guides to embrace the contemplation of the laws of nature: Equilibrium. Finding the new state of equilibrium after mining is a key state that mining engineers need to restore. Otherwise, the past would repeat itself. To avoid wastes accumulation as a liability, waste cannot be left unused. This is a different time; we can present the vision of future in mining where our benefit not only reflects on economical aspects, but also the aspects of nature. This condition would allow benefits, challenges, and opportunities, which are inherent in the vision. The values are in the relationships of restoration of stability where waste is not a consequence, but byproduct with high utilization. The harmony is replicated from nature (Geomimic). There is big difference between efficiency and effectiveness. We are effective with nature. Innovation with imitation also has a big difference, but both are on the same coin face. The challenge in todays business for the future is that we can start with the simplicity of the answer to the following question: How can we run mining without petroleum? Thinking as it is, we will arrive that we do not need the obsolete internal combustion motor (created in1879). It is well known, in spite of the solution in other source of energies, the equipment presented in todays market is based on petroleum. This condition has immediately enough motivation to display a brainstorm of alternatives. We will generate a new model for a new system. Ethics must be the classic systemic guide to think. Knowledge comes from people who know very little but want to know more; not from authorities. All knowledge derives from the senses and observation. The book of nature is always open because our nature does not have many formulas written in our nature or our mountains. Our senses find disequilibrium. Our connection to reality is observation in its symmetry of nature to try to communicate with nature in its own language (back to basics). It is important to have or to develop an important base of meteorological data to support the condition in the long term of the waste (rainfall, microclimate change, runoff, etc). The ecosystems are different in every mine therefore is acceptable to have different designs as well. The main contribution is in the stability of the planet, which makes it more livable to humans. It is relevant to bear that economy in the dimension of engineering is clear specifically in design We cannot make design economically acceptable but only design naturally acceptable. The model of the business cannot continue where it permits depreciation of capital and depletion of finite natural resource carrying NPV to zero are from a economist view which means lack of the holistic view of the business. Given this condition also it is necessary to calculate the value of the resource in the time rather than money in time to determine level of scarcity as an item of mine valuation. Economy should serve the people but not vice versa. Mining engineer is a manager of nature Then, we cannot do mining without a waste design. We do not have room to avoid it. There is no room for compromises. It is determinant; nature does not need human promises or reduction because nature does not work with those standards of human ways. Nature needs different human input to reach different results from the traditional model in place. We need the Earth for survival! The Earth does not need us! If we see the universe we can realize that we are nothing and have nothing to rule the magnificence of the universe. We cannot continue business as usual; the form of doing actual business is a mindset with caducity. We can only generate different results with different methods of mining. We only follow guidelines that other people created without a consultation from nature, and we do not have any guilt conveyed or attached in our action. Mining engineering must be inspired in nature to survive the industry of the future. Even though in mining, the highest volumes of material removed looks like we have a determination to abandon Earth in short term. This is a scenario that portrays only in a fantasy story because we cannot reach the universe, yet. It is important to restore our nature as soon we intervene with disturbance in the equilibrium. It is necessary to explain that growth has limitation and development is unlimited creativity and innovation in the harmony of nature. The bottom line is TIME. We must have the time of disturbance and the time of restoration of nature to determine the restoration to nature. Its balance cannot finalize in disequilibrium in order to restore its balance over time. To evaluate the perturbation into a stable system is our priority for stable nature. It is important to get the performance to know what is going on in a system. With the model we can observe significantly different characteristics and dynamics under different conditions exposed. This paper is prepared to motivate critical thinking as the first manifestation of the mining career in order to find the identity and attitude regarding mining liabilities. Hopefully, these also will conduct the dialogue and spirit of contribution and begin to develop an intergenerational effective communication. SME Annual Meeting Feb. 27-Mar. 02, 2011, Denver, CO
10 Copyright 2011 by SME REFERENCES 1. Masters, Gil Introduction to environmental Engineering & Science, 2 nd Edition Prentice Hall, 1997. 2. Environmental Protection Agency EPA, USA 2010. 3. Mines, Richards, Introduction to Environmental Engineering, Prentice Hall, 2009. 4. ASCE, The committee on Sustainability of Technical Activities communities, Sustainable Engineering Practice: An Introduction, Reston Virginia 2004. 5. Javier, Mauro, Management by Loss, SME 2008. 6. John Adams, Mathematics in Nature, Princeton University Press, 2003. 7. Pollack, H. Gerald, Seminar of Water, Energy & Biology, Theory of Water, Water Center University of Washington, 2010.