Access Details: [subscription number 791568189] Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Journal of Change Management Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713703618 Editorial: Managing Organizational Change in Public Services Rune Todnem By; Calum Macleod Online Publication Date: 01 March 2008 To cite this Article: By, Rune Todnem and Macleod, Calum (2008) 'Editorial: Managing Organizational Change in Public Services', Journal of Change Management, 8:1, 1 - 2 To link to this article: DOI: 10.1080/14697010801937168 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14697010801937168 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article maybe used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. D o w n l o a d e d
B y :
[ B y ,
R u n e
T o d n e m ]
A t :
0 8 : 5 6
1 9
M a r c h
2 0 0 8
Editorial: Managing Organizational Change in Public Services Given the essentially political terrain that public services inhabit, it is perhaps not surprising that organizational change is a constant theme as governments strive to deliver more, better, faster in an endless search for the 4Es of economy, ef- ciency, effectiveness and equity in public services design and delivery. Indeed, the evolution of public services management has been marked by a distinctive shift from traditional post-1945 notions of public administration, emphasizing hierarchical state control and highly bureaucratized institutional structures and processes, to that of new public management (NPM) in the 1980s and early 1990s; the latter adopting an essentially managerialist perspective on the delivery of public services in which markets, competition, individualism and measurable performance were dominant characteristics. More recently, in the United Kingdom and elsewhere, governments have sought to chart a third way in which elements of the public, private and voluntary sectors are fused together within partnership-based cross-sectoral delivery arrangements in pursuit of public services which achieve the 4Es highlighted previously. The shifting sands of governmental preferences regarding what objectives public services should deliver (be it in relation to health and well-being, economic opportunity, education or security) and how they should deliver them, present sig- nicant change challenges for public service organizations, managers and other interested stakeholders to navigate. A far from inexhaustible list of such chal- lenges includes: ensuring organizational alignment with the political environment and integration of political preferences; managing institutional and individual power relationships; setting the parameters of managerial discretion and employee empowerment; and responding to new imperatives regarding perform- ance measurement and evaluation in public services. This special issue of the Journal of Change Management represents a timely juncture at which to pause to examine a number of these challenges as they relate to the process of managing organizational change within public services contexts. The rst article, by Fernandez-Alles and Llamas-Sanchez, explores how neoinstitutional theory can explain change in public services. By and col- leagues then propose ways of managing organizational change in public services, in this case European Higher Education, successfully by providing a new concep- tual change management model and a decision-makers change manifesto. Journal of Change Management Vol. 8, No. 1, 12, March 2008 1469-7017 Print/1479-1811 Online/08/0100012 # 2008 Taylor & Francis DOI: 10.1080/14697010801937168 D o w n l o a d e d
B y :
[ B y ,
R u n e
T o d n e m ]
A t :
0 8 : 5 6
1 9
M a r c h
2 0 0 8
Dovey draws attention to the structural inhibitors of effective service delivery within a South African public health organization. Furthermore, he outlines a new initiative that aims to facilitate the decentralization of decision-making power in an attempt to transform the service offered by this organization. Conti- nuing with the theme of public health organizations, Klarner and colleagues analyze and compare the World Health Organizations change capacity in different contexts through a recently established conceptual framework for change capacity. The two nal articles are more general in focus, but the issues raised and sug- gestions provided are clearly of interest to people involved with public services management. McGuire and colleagues note that by devolving responsibility for human resource (HR) practices to line managers, public services organizations expect a closer relationship between line managers and employees resulting in speedier decision-making and more effective resolution of workplace problems. In order to facilitate such change they present a model identifying the context, enablers and inhibitors of line manager HR involvement. The last article, by Karp and Helg, describes a way for public services leaders to lead chaotic change by inuencing the patterns of human interaction and to focus change man- agement on people, identity and relationships by changing the way people talk in the organization. Rune Todnem By and Calum Macleod 2 Editorial