Eth125 Week 5 Dqs • In 1954, Brown v. Board of Education desegregated schools in the United States and deemed desegregated schools separate but unequal. Do you think the legislation was an appropriate reaction to segregation in schools? Do you think the legislation is still relevant? Explain your response.
Eth125 Week 5 Dqs • In 1954, Brown v. Board of Education desegregated schools in the United States and deemed desegregated schools separate but unequal. Do you think the legislation was an appropriate reaction to segregation in schools? Do you think the legislation is still relevant? Explain your response.
Eth125 Week 5 Dqs • In 1954, Brown v. Board of Education desegregated schools in the United States and deemed desegregated schools separate but unequal. Do you think the legislation was an appropriate reaction to segregation in schools? Do you think the legislation is still relevant? Explain your response.
Eth125 Week 5 Dqs • In 1954, Brown v. Board of Education desegregated schools in the United States and deemed desegregated schools separate but unequal. Do you think the legislation was an appropriate reaction to segregation in schools? Do you think the legislation is still relevant? Explain your response.
Eth125 Week 5 Dqs • In 1954, Brown v. Board of Education desegregated schools in the United States and deemed desegregated schools separate but unequal. Do you think the legislation was an appropriate reaction to segregation in schools? Do you think the legislation is still relevant? Explain your response.
In 1954, Brown v. Board of Education desegregated schools in the United States
and deemed desegregated schools separate but unequal. Do you think the legislation was an appropriate reaction to segregation in schools? Do you think the legislation is still relevant? Explain your response.
I have been trying to read up on Brown v. Board of Education describing the desegregation of schools in the United States. I understand that it a result of "separate" schools for black and white people but was described as "Separate but Equal". This seemed a way that our society could justify the segregation in public areas. They would separate them out but they would provide equal services for both races. The part that confuses me is when it is listed in the question "Separate but Unequal" I have been trying to find information about the definition of unequal but have not hade much luck. On page 75 it states that "Discrimination involves the unequal treatment of various categories" so I am a bit confused. If it was in fact stated that schools were separate but unequal I would assume it is referring to social standing. The only thing that made any since as to why it would be listed as separate but unequal to me is on page 77 that states:"Why do the various racial and ethnic categories of the U.S. population have unequal social standing? The following discussion draws answers from sociologys three major theoretical approaches: structural-functional, symbolic-interaction, and social-conflict analysis of people. If I understand the reading it is simply stating that we are not all equal but we should not be discriminated against because of our differences. To be honest, Im not sure I completely understand.
Week 5 DQ 2 Your texts say that according to sociologists, racial categories are misleading and are harmful ways to divide human groups. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Why?
I automatically think that we need to categorize people and racial groups because that is all I know. I am not saying it is right but my first thought is that I disagree with the statement that racial categories are misleading and are harmful ways to divide human groups. I do realize that there is very little good things that have come out of doing this in the past. I can in fact say that virtually nothing good has come from racially categorizing people in our nations history. The feeling of agreement with what the sociologists say about racial categories gets stronger when I watched the video called "Save our History: voices of civil rights. The stories made my heart ach for what some of those people in the video had to go through. That was all brought about by the racial categories placed upon the African American community. To sum up my feelings, after this course so far I do agree with the statement.
Week 5 DQ 3 Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction of an ethnic, racial, or national group, such as the Turkish killing of Armenians after WWI, the Nazis slaughter of 6 million European Jews during WWII, or the mass killings in Rwanda in 1994. Has genocide ever been practiced or condoned in the United States? Explain your response.
I do believe that genocide has been practiced and condoned in the United States. According to Macionis (2012), Genocide is the systematic killing of one category of people by another. Genocide is mass murder; even so, it has taken place time and again in human history, often tolerated and sometimes even encouraged by governments and their people. (pp.61). One situation where it was encouraged by the United States government is found on page 64 of the text and talks briefly about the systematic killing of one category of people by another in the 1800's. The story is brief and mentions thousands of deaths but many more stories can be found in other sources. At first, the U.S. government viewed native peoples as independent nations and tried to gain land from them through treaties. But the government was quick to use superior military power against any who resisted. Soldiers forcibly removed the Cherokee from their homelands in the southeastern United States, causing thousands of deaths along what came to be known as the Trail of Tears. By 1800, few native people remained along the East Coast. (Macionis, 2012, pp.64).