Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER - 1
2
INTRODUCTION
1. INTRODUCTION
3
An organization’s goals can be achieved only when people put in their
best efforts. Effective utilization of Human Resources is one of the most
important factors for the efficient and profitable functioning of an
organization. Organizations provide welfare facilities to their employees to
keep their motivation levels high thereby increasing the productivity of an
organization. Welfare work aims at providing such facilities and amenities,
which enable the employees in an organization to perform their work in
healthy, congenial surrounding conducive to good health and high morale of
the employees.
4
Definition:
5
Meaning:
Objectives:
6
➢ To relieve workers from industrial fatigue and to improve intellectual,
cultural and material conditions of living of the workers.
1. The rater has observed and is familiar with welfare facilities provide.
8
3. The rater has a checklist to obtain and review job – related
information.
6. The rater focuses attention on rater behaviors over which the rater has
better control than in other aspects of evaluation.
➢ minimize interruptions
9
➢ ask open – ended questions to encourage discussion
➢ listen
➢ Be specific
➢ Complete form
➢ Grievance programmes
➢ HR planning
10
Use of data:
1. The final step in the evaluation process is the use of evaluation data.
The data and information generated through evaluation of welfare
facilities must be used by the HR department.
2. Money to purchase goods and services required not only for current and
future survival, but also for the luxuries modern life has to offer.
11
3. The opportunity to use innate and learned skills and talents in a
productive manner that the individual and his or her managers and co-
workers recognize as valuable.
This study aims to understand the welfare facilities provided and the
degree of satisfaction achieved by the employees and to provide necessary
steps to development.
Development uses
Administrative uses
Organizational maintenance
Documentation
13
1.2.1 IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY
➢ The result arrived out of this study would know about their need for
better performance in future.
14
➢ Study on welfare measures provided is a on going or continuous
process where in the evaluation are arranged periodically according to
a definite plan.
15
➢ Embed teamwork in all operational process.
.
1.3.1 INTRODUCTION:
16
A literature review must do these things:
a. Be organized around and related directly to the thesis or research
question
Importance:
The literature review is a critical look at the existing research that is
significant to the work that the researcher is carrying out. Although the
researcher need to summarize relevant research, it is also vital that evaluate
this work, show the relationships between different works, and show how it
relates to work.
17
1.4 ORGANIZATION OF THE PROJECT
Then the data is analyzed and interpreted for conclusion. For the
analyzing portion the researcher used various statistical tools like
percentage, Standard Deviation, chi- square test, Rank correlation and
ANOVA then finally the conclusion was made.
18
First chapter
First chapter deals with the need for the selection of this topic, review
of literature and organization of the project.
Second chapter
Third chapter
Fourth chapter
Fourth chapter deals with the data analysis and interpretation and
various statistical tools used to describe the findings and suggestions.
Fifth chapter
19
The final chapter states the conclusion which includes summary of
findings and recommendations.
CHAPTER - 2
20
COMPANY PROFILE
21
2. COMPANY PROFILE
22
components to Breaks India Limited, and Rane TRW running
in 3 shifts at mogappair with a staff strength of about 250
employees.
HRD vision:
HRD goals
23
➢ Foster employee involvement and develop a work ethos
that builds dignity and pride.
HRD ORGANIZATION
Leadership development:
25
Leadership and managerial capabilities are developed
through specific training programmes, job rotation,
participation in cross teams etc.
26
Objective:
• To attract potential employees into the rolls of the
company
27
Resourcing Process flow of the Company
Resourcing Process
28
29
CHAPTER - 3
30
RESEARCH METHODALOGY
3. RESEARCH METHODALOGY
Meaning of research:
Methodology:
32
3.1 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
33
This particular topic is chosen because development of employee
welfare facilities has a vital role in organizational development. This project
is aimed at understanding employee’s satisfaction level and welfare needs.
Primary objective
34
Secondary objectives
35
4. The Suggestions made at the end are based on the information given
by the employees and HR consultants of ask.commerce pvt. ltd.
3.4 HYPOTHESIS
36
There is relationship between the gender/age and satisfaction level on
welfare
facilities provided to employees.
3.5 SAMPLING
3.5.1 POPULATION
37
In any statistical investigation we are interested in studying the
various characteristics relating to items are individual belonging to particular
growth. This group of individuals under study is known as the population.
Nearly 300 employees are working in Sri Shivasakthi Engineers. Out of this
225 member are working as operators/workers in the factory. This study
based mainly on attitudes of the operators in the establishment. So, 300
employees were taken as the population for this study.
For this study Stratified Random sampling method was used. Under
this method population (225 workers) is divided into 3 sub population (3
shifts). From this each sub population samples were selected randomly.
38
3.6 PLAN OF ANALYZING THE DATA
The research design used for this study is of the Descriptive research
includes surveys and fact-findings enquire of different kinds. The major
purpose of descriptive research is description of the state of affairs as it exits
at present. The main objective of this research design is to acquire
knowledge.
Questionnaire has been used as the tool for data collection in this
study as it acts as a direct tool to research the target group. This
Questionnaire covers various aspects of industrial relations in the
establishment.
39
The data used in this study are primary data and secondary data.
3.6.3 Primary Data
Primary data are those which are collected for the first time, and thus
happen to be original. The Data collected from the respondents is through
Questionnaire; the data collection is directly related to the topic being
studied.
3.6.4 Secondary Data
Secondary data are those, which have been collected by someone else
for some other purpose. In other words, secondary data refers to the data
compiled from already available data. They are websites, Business
magazines, reports prepared by the scholars, company records, etc.
3.6.5 Statistical Tool Used
Package for social science (SPSS) to summarize the research data are
tables, graphs, bar diagram, and pie charts, cross tabulation for finding how
variables are ordered and related, chi-square test, percentage analysis,
correlation method and weighted average method used to finding the
attitudes and practices of the establishment.
40
The Chi-square is an important test amongst several tests of
significance developed by Statisticians. Chi-square symbolically written as
Ψ² is a statistical measure used in the Context of sampling analysis for
comparing a variance to a theoretical variance.
O = Observed Frequency
E = Expected Frequency
41
= Ewx
Formula:
Weighted average = ∑ F W/ ∑ W
CHAPTER - 4
42
DATA PRESENTATION
&
ANALYSIS
43
TABLE – 4.1
S. No Particular No of Percentage
person
1 Excellent 20 20%
2 Good 25 25%
3 Moderate 55 55%
4 poor 0 0%
Chart– 4.1
44
Source: Primary data
INFERENCE:
45
TABLE – 4.2
S. No Particular No of Percentag
person e
2 Agree 32 32%
3 Neutral 12 12%
4 Disagree 13 13%
Chart – 4.2
Source: Primary data
INFERENCE:
46
From the above table it is found that 26 % of the employees strongly
agree that they are provided with suitable training for their development, 32
% of the employees perceive agree, 12 % of the employees perceive neutral,
13 % of the employees perceive disagree, 17 % of the employees perceive
strongly disagree.
47
TABLE – 4.3
ATTITUDE OF SUPERVISOR/MANGER
S. No Particular No of Percentage
person
1 friendly 45 45
2 Normal 37 37
3 Strict 15 15
4 Grim 3 3
Chart - 4.3
INFERENCE:
48
It is interpreted that the 45 % of the employees feel that their
supervisor/manager has friendly attitude, 37 % of the employees are feel its
normal, 15 % of employees are feel its very strict. 3 % of people gave no
comments on it.
49
TABLE – 4.4
S. No Particular No of Percentage
person
1 Satisfied 86 86%
2 Dissatisfied 0 0%
3 neutral 14 14%
Chart – 4.4
INFERENCE:
50
It is interpreted from the above table 86 % of employees are feel
satisfied with cab facilities provided to them. 14 % of people gave no
comments on it.
51
TABLE – 4.5
CANTEEN/FOOD SUBSIDY
S. No Particular No of Percentage
person
1 Excellent 10 10 %
2 Good 45 45 %
3 Average 43 43 %
4 poor 2 2%
Chart –4.5
Source: Primary data
INFERENCE:
52
It is defined from the above chart 10 % of employees declared that
they have excellent canteen facilities. 45 % of employees were declared that
its good, 43 % of employees declared neutral, 2 % of people declared poor.
53
TABLE - 4.6
S. No Particular No of Percentage
person
1 Excellent 22 22
2 Good 68 68
3 Average 6 6
4 Poor 4 4
Chart -4.6
Source: Primary data
INFERENCE:
S. No Particular No of Percentage
person
Chart - 4.7
Source: Primary data
INFERENCE:
56
factor, and 14% of the employees feel improved self development as no.1
motivation factor.
57
TABLE –4.8
S. No Particular No of Percentage
person
2 No 0 0%
Chart –4.8
Source: Primary data
INFERENCE:
From the above table, we see that all the employees (100%) prefer
more welfare program for their development.
58
TABLE - 4.9
59
OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH EXISTING WELFARE FACILITIES
S. No Particular No of Percentage
person
1 Highly 12 12 %
satisfied
2 Satisfied 31 31 %
3 Dissatisfied 47 47 %
4 undecided 10 10 %
Chart - 4.9
Source: Primary data
INFERENCE:
60
61
12. Rate the benefits of Welfare facilities
Hi
Stro
ghl Not
Sa ngly
S.N y Neu sati
PARTICULARS tisf diss
O. sat tral sfie
ied atisf
isfi d
ied
ed
1 Increased efficiency 35 21 26 12 6
2 Increased Moral 24 15 12 26 23
3 Better HR relation 20 13 17 29 21
Better Organization climate
4 24 23 10 15 28
5 Adaptability to change 22 45 11 6 16
6 Higher job satisfaction 24 28 15 20 14
7 Higher Motivation 29 16 10 23 22
Total 134 161 101 271 130
Percentage 20.2
16.8 12.7 34 16.3
0
Chart: 4.10.1
62
63
INFERENCE:
From the above table 4.10 figure it is inferred that, there are perceive
increased efficiency 35 respondents highly satisfied that their jobs require
Training and development, 21 employees satisfied the statement, 26
respondents are belong to neutral 2 respondents dissatisfied the statement.6
respondents strongly Dissatisfied.
Chart: 4.10.2
64
65
INFERENCE:
Chart: 4.10.3
66
67
INFERENCE
From the table 4.10 and chart 4.10.3 it is inferred that, there are 16.80% of
the employees highly satisfied the beneficial of welfare programs, 20.2 % the
employees satisfied the beneficial of the welfare programs, 12.7 % of employees
fall under the category of neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 34 % of them
dissatisfied the statements and only 10.40% of the respondents strongly
dissatisfied.
68
NEI
ST THE
STR
RO R
ON
NG AG AGR DIS
S.N GLY
PARTICULARS LY RE EE AG
O. DIS
AG E NOR REE
AGR
RE DIS
EE
E AGR
EE
1 Increased productivity 46 22 10 15 7
2 Increased sales 26 35 22 13 5
Increased customer
3 12 15 24 23 26
satisfaction
4 Decreased turnover rate 17 13 20 29 21
5 Decreased absenteeism 10 15 23 24 28
Total 111 100 98 104 87
Percentage 22.2 20 19.6 20.8 17.4
Chart 4.11.1
69
70
INFERENCE
71
10 respondents strongly agree that outcome as the result of better
welfare program there are decreased absenteeism, 15 respondent are agree,
23 of them neither agree nor disagree the statement, 24 respondents are
belong to disagree the statement, 28 respondents strongly disagree the
statement.
Chart 4.11.2
INFERENCE
72
From the above table it is inferred that, there are 22.2 % of the employees
strongly agree overall the statements and 26.60 % the employees agree over all the
statement, 24.40 % of employees fall under the category of neither neither agree
nor disagree, 19.10 % of them disagree the statements and only 10.40% of the
respondents strongly disagree.
Statistical Tools
73
Chi – square methods:
Question:75
1. Sex
2. Rate the following benefits of the welfare program
TABLE 4.12
Problem:
74
Satisfact
ion HS S NU NS HNS Total
level
gender
Male 15 24 6 10 7 62
Female 10 16 3 6 3 38
Total 25 40 9 16 10 100
A = 62 A = 62
B = 25 B = 40
N = 100 N = 100
EF = 62*25/100 EF = 63*40/100
= 15.5 = 24.8
A = 62 A = 62
B=9 B = 16
N = 100 N = 100
EF = 62*9/100 EF = 62*16/100
= 5.58 = 9.92
A = 62 A = 38
B = 10 B = 25
N = 100 N = 100
EF = 62*10/100 EF = 38*25/100
75
= 6.2 = 9.5
A = 38 A = 38
B = 40 B=9
N = 100 N = 100
EF = 38*40/100 EF = 38*9/100
= 15.2 = 3.42
A = 38 A = 38
B = 16 B = 10
N = 100 N = 100
EF = 38*16/100 EF = 38*10/100
= 6.08 = 3.8
Solution:
O E O-E (O –E)2 (O –E)2 / E
15 15.5 -.5 .25 .016
24 24.8 -.8 .64 .025
6 5.58 .42 .17 .030
10 9.92 .08 .006 .000
76
7 6.2 .8 .64 .10
10 9.5 .5 .25 .26
16 15.2 .8 .64 .04
3 3.42 -.42 .18 .05
6 6.08 -.08 .0064 .000
3 3.8 -.08 .0064 .000
Total .521
Degrees of freedom
= (r-1) * (c-1)
= (5-1) * (2-1)
=4*1
=4
= .46 < 9.49 Hence the calculated value of Ψ 2 is less than the table value.
Null Hypothesis:
The null hypothesis is accepted.
Result:
There is no relationship between the gender and satisfaction with the welfare
facilities.
Question:
1. Age
2. How do you feel about the welfare facilities provided in your
company?
77
Null Hypothesis (Ho):
There is no relationship between age and satisfaction level.
TABLE 4.13
Total 18 40 32 10 100
A = 28 A = 28
B = 18 B = 40
N = 100 N = 100
EF = 28*10/100 EF = 28*40/100
= 5.04 = 11.2
A = 28 A = 28
B = 32 B = 10
N = 100 N = 100
EF = 28*32/100 EF = 28*10/100
78
= 8.96 = 32.8
A = 31 A = 31
B = 18 B = 40
N = 100 N = 100
EF = 31*18/100 EF = 31*40/100
= 5.58 = 12.4
A = 31 A = 31
B = 32 B = 10
N = 100 N = 100
EF = 31*32/100 EF = 31*10/100
= 9.92 = 3.1
A = 29 A = 29
B = 18 B = 40
N = 100 N = 100
EF = 29*18/100 EF = 29*40/100
= 5.22 = 11.6
A = 29 A = 29
B = 32 B = 10
N = 100 N = 100
EF = 29*32/100 EF = 29*10/100
= 9.28 = 2.9
79
A = 12 A = 12
B = 18 B = 40
N = 100 N = 100
EF = 12*18/100 EF = 12*40/100
= 2.16 = 4.8
A = 12 A = 12
B = 32 B = 10
N = 100 N = 100
EF = 12*32/100 EF = 12*10/100
= 3.84 = 1.2
80
4 2.9 1.1 1.21 .13
2 2.16 -.16 .0256 .01
5 4.8 .2 .04 .008
3 3.84 -.84 .705 .18
2 1.2 .8 .64 .533
Total 8.802
Degrees of freedom
= (r-1) * (c-1)
= (4-1) * (4-1)
=3*3
=9
= 8.802 <16.19
Hence the calculated value of chi square is less than the table value.
Null Hypothesis:
The null hypothesis is accepted.
Result:
There is no relationship between the age and satisfaction level of employees
81
WEIGHTED AVERAGE METHOD
Question:
Rate the following benefits of the better welfare facilities.
Applying weights
82
N Av
o er
N t Stro ag
Highl
Sa e s ngly e
S.N y
PARTICULARS tisf u a diss
O. satisf
ied tr ti atisf
ied
al sf ied
ie
d
1 Increased efficiency 35 21 26 12 6 3.67
2 Increased Moral 24 15 12 26 23 2.91
3 Better HR relation 20 13 17 29 21 2.82
Better Organization climate 3.00
4 24 23 10 15 28
5 Adaptability to change 22 45 11 6 16 3.51
6 Higher job satisfaction 24 28 15 20 14 3.31
7 Higher Motivation 29 16 10 23 22 3.07
Increased efficiency
= 175+84+78+24+6
= 367 / 100
= 3.67
Increased Moral
= 120+60+36+52+23
= 291 / 100
= 2.91
83
Better HR relation
= 100+52+51+58+21
= 282 /100
= 2.82
= 120+92+30+30+28
= 300 /100
= 3.00
Adaptability to change
= 110+180+33+12+16
= 351/100
= 3.51
Higher job satisfaction
= 120+112+45+40+14
= 331/100
= 3.31
84
Higher Motivation
= 145+64+30+46+22
= 307 / 100
= 3.07
Adaptability to 3.51 2
change
Higher job 3.31 3
satisfaction
Higher Motivation 3.07 4
Result:
From the table it is clear that 1st rank goes to the increased efficiency for the
better welfare programs, 2nd rank goes to adaptability to change, 3rd rank
goes to the higher job satisfaction, 4th rank
goes to the higher motivation, 5th
rank goes to the better organization climate, 6th rank goes to the Increased
morale, 7th rank goes to the Better HR relation.
85
Question:
86
NEITHE STR
STRO R ONG Aver
DISA
S.N NGLY AGR AGREE LY age
PARTICULARS GRE
O. AGRE EE NOR DISA
E
E DISAG GRE
REE E
Increased 3.85
1 46 22 10 15 7
productivity
2 Increased sales 26 35 22 13 5 3.64
Increased customer 2.64
3 12 15 24 23 26
satisfaction
Decreased turnover 2.76
4 17 13 20 29 21
rate
Decreased 2.55
5 10 15 23 24 28
absenteeism
Increased productivity
= 46*5+22*4+10*3+15*2+7*1
= 230+88+30+30+7
= 385/100
= 3.85
Increased Sales
= 26*5+35*4+21*3+31*2+5*1
= 130+140+63+26+5
87
= 364/100
= 3.64
= 12*5+15*4+24*3+23*2+26*1
= 60+60+72+46+26
= 264/100
= 2.64
Decreased turnover
= 17*5+13*4+20*3+29*2+21*1
= 85+52+60+58+21
= 276/100
=2.76
Decreased Absenteeism
= 10*5+15*4+23*3+24*2+28*1
= 50+60+69+48+28
= 255/100
= 2.55
Increased 3.85 1
productivity
Increased sales 3.64 2
88
Increased customer 2.64 4
satisfaction
Decreased turnover 2.76 3
rate
Decreased 2.55 5
absenteeism
Result:
From the table it is clear that 1st rank goes to the increased productivity from
better welfare facilities outcome, 2nd rank goes to increased sales, 3rd rank
goes to the increased customer satisfaction, 4th rank goes to the increased
turnover rate, and 5th rank goes to the decreased absenteeism.
89
CHAPTER - 5
90
FINDINGS
SUGGESTION
&
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION
FINDINGS
91
➢ 55 % of the employees feel moderate about space and physical comfort
in working place, 25 % of the employees fell good about space and
physical comfort in working place, 20 % of employees feel its
excellent .
92
More Welfare Facilities:
➢ All the employees (100%) prefer more welfare facilities for their
career and life development.
93
➢ Increased morale for 24 respondents highly satisfied that their jobs
require suitable welfare programs, 15 employees satisfied the
statement, 2 respondents are belong to neutral 26 respondents
dissatisfied the statement.23 respondents strongly Dissatisfied.
94
Outcomes as the result of adequate and appropriate programs:
➢ It is inferred that, there are 22.2 % of the employees strongly agree overall
the statements and 26.60 % the employees agree over all the statement,
24.40 % of employees fall under the category of neither agree nor disagree,
19.10 % of them disagree the statements and only 10.40% of the respondents
strongly disagree.
96
SUGGESTION AND RECOMMENDATION
➢ All the employees prefer the more adequate welfare programs for their
career and life development.
98
APPENDIX
Personal details
Name
99
Job title
Department
100
3. How
To
Moderate
Strongly
Disagree
5.
6.
Strict
Agree
Grim
Normal
Friendly
7.
Dissatisfied
Satisfied
Poor
Neutral
Good
Excellent
What
Are
what
Above satisfied
45do
isextent
agree
disagree
your
you with
do
feel
supervisor/manager
you
about
conveyance
agree
Space
thethat
Welfare
(pickup/drop)
and
youattitude
comfort
facilities
are provided
towards
(physical)
provided
facilities
with
you?in
provided
suitable
inworking
your to place ?
training for your development?
you?
organization?
Average Poor
Rightful promotion
Deserved Increment
10. Do you need more welfare programs for your career and live
development?
Yes No
Dissatisfied Undecided
1 Increased efficiency
2 Increased morale
3 Better HR relation
4 Better organizational
climate
5 Adaptability to change
6 Attitudinal change
8 High motivation
13. Give your agreement to the following outcomes as the result of Better
welfare programs in your company
103
Stron Agre Neutr Dis Strongly
gly e al agr disagree
S. agree ee
No Particular
1 Increased productivity
2 Increased sales
3 Increased customer
satisfaction
4 Decreased turnover
rate
5 Decreased
Absenteeism
BIBLIOGRAPHY
104
2. Arora P.N.,Arora.S., Statistics for management, S.Chand & company
2002.
4. Carvel, Fred j., Human relation in Business, Macmillan & co, New
york 1973.
New Delhi.
WEBSITES:
www.employeewelfaremeasureguide.info
www.inforambler.com
www.successfulfactors.com
105