version 4.

8 (4/30/13)
visit www.stonestrong.com to check current version
1 The conventional (non LRFD) calculation methodology generally adheres to the AASHTO Standard
Specifications for Highway Bridges (17th Edition, 2002). Additional methods and practices follow the FHWA
Mechinically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Slopes Design and Construction Guidelines, NHI-00-043.
Specific methods, procedures, equations, and nomenclature can be found in the Gravity Wall Design
Methodology and Example Gravity Calculations in the Engineering Manual and available on the Stone
Strong web site www.StoneStrong.com.
2 The end user is responsible for all highlighted input values and changes to unhighlighted program default
values. Properties for soil and other materials should be obtained through testing or from recommendations
by an experienced geotechnical engineer with knowledge of local materials and practices.
USER NOTES
Stone Strong LLC is the owner of this computer file and retains all common law, statutory, and other reserved
rights including the copyright. Limited license is granted to copy, print, or use this spreadsheet as an aid in
performing design calculations for Stone Strong retaining walls. Stone Strong LLC makes no warranties, either
expressed or implied, of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose, and accept no responsibility for the
accuracy, suitability, or completeness of information contained herein.
Licensee acknowledges that this computer file is the proprietary property of Stone Strong LLC. Licensee certifies
that he/she will maintain this computer file as a confidential trade secret and will not copy or distribute the file to
any person or entity that is not acting under his/her direct supervision and control.
This calculation spreadsheet is provided for general information purposes only. Anyone making use of
this spreadsheet and related information does so at their own risk and assumes all liability for such use.
Site specific design should be performed by a licensed Professional Engineer based on actual site
conditions, materials, and local practices.
S T O N E S T R O N G L L C
2 The end user is responsible for all highlighted input values and changes to unhighlighted program default
values. Properties for soil and other materials should be obtained through testing or from recommendations
by an experienced geotechnical engineer with knowledge of local materials and practices.
3 The backfill height defaults to the total wall height, assuming that the wall is backfilled to the top of any Cap
units or Dual Face units. The backfill height may be overwritten where the Cap or Dual Face units are
allowed to project above grade. The total wall height and backfill height are measured from the top of the
base pad, neglecting embedment. The exposed height is the total backfill height less the embedment depth.
Note that passive resistance at the toe is neglected per customary engineering practice for modular wall
systems. See the Wall Height Terminology sketch located below.
4 The lateral load above the wall will evaluate live loads such as wind loads on a fence, lateral forces on a
hand-rail, or barrier loads on an above grade Dual Face section. This live load is not included in seismic
calculations (if used). The height above the top of the wall is defined as the height above the blocks, not
above the backfill height (where the backfill height is set at less than the wall height for a Cap or Dual Face
projection above grade). See the Wall Height Terminology sketch located below.
5 The soil parameters default to uniform conditions. The foundation soils are set to match changes in the
retained soils, but can be overwritten for non-uniform soils. For a sound rock foundation, enter "rock" or
"ledge" (without quotations) instead of a friction angle for the foundation soil.
S T O N E S T R O N G L L C
6 The trial wedge routine will automatically solve complex slope, tier, and surcharge geometry. Sloped
embankments may be defined by entering the slope value (run per foot of rise) or by entering the elevation
change over the defined segment length. Entry method is toggled by entering "slope" or "elevation" in the
entry field in the non-printed space to the right of the slope section. The segment lengths for the zoned
slopes and surcharges are measured successively beginning from the front face of the wall. Up to 4
segments may be entered, and all segment lengths are horizontal. The total defined distance must exceed
the influence distance of the trial wedges, typically beginning at approximatley 30 degrees above horizontal.
The length of segment 1 is measured from the face of the wall, and the lengths of segments 2, 3, and 4 are
measured from the previous segment. Tiers may be entered between segments. For purposes of the trial
wedge analysis, all tiers are assumed vertical. See the Backslope & Surcharge Terminology sketch located
below.
7 A rigid boundary, such as a rock ledge or an embedded structural element, may be modeled by entering a
negative tier height at the location of the rigid boundary. The boundary is assumed to be vertical.
8 Live load surcharges may be entered for individual zone segments. Live load surcharges would include
vehicle loads and other intermittent surcharges. LL surcharges are omitted in seismic analysis (if used).
9 The conventional calculations for overturning and contact pressure use a reduced block base width to
account for rounding of the face (reduced by 2 inches by default). Contact pressure can be reduced by
increasing the thickness of the granular base (see note #14).
10 The recommended design procedure for extended blocks (62HD, 86HD, or 24-ME) or tail extensions is to
determine the maximum gravity height without an extension for the specific soil and loading conditions, and
to use extended blocks or tail extension for at least the entire wall section that exceeds this limiting height.
Several precast extended block types are included in the Block Library, but the user should verify availabiltity
of extended units. Cast in place extensions may be added to individual block courses. For blocks with a
height of 914 mm (24SF units), the extender may be limited to the bottom half by selecting "1/2 H" in the cell
next to the extension width. This feature is disabled for blocks with a height of 457 mm (6SF units).
S T O N E S T R O N G L L C
10 The recommended design procedure for extended blocks (62HD, 86HD, or 24-ME) or tail extensions is to
determine the maximum gravity height without an extension for the specific soil and loading conditions, and
to use extended blocks or tail extension for at least the entire wall section that exceeds this limiting height.
Several precast extended block types are included in the Block Library, but the user should verify availabiltity
of extended units. Cast in place extensions may be added to individual block courses. For blocks with a
height of 914 mm (24SF units), the extender may be limited to the bottom half by selecting "1/2 H" in the cell
next to the extension width. This feature is disabled for blocks with a height of 457 mm (6SF units).
11 For calculating driving forces applied to the wall, the effective batter of the back of the blocks is taken as the
facing batter when uniform block widths are used. If any extended blocks (62HD, 86HD, or 24-ME) or a cast
in place tail extension is included, the batter on the back of the wall is recalculated following AASHTO
recommendations for stepped modules. The soil wedge that is mobilized by the tail extension is included in
stability calculations.
12 When an extended block (62HD, 86HD, or 24-ME) or a cast in place tail extension is included, the interface
friction angle is taken as 3/4 of the retained soil friction angle per AASHTO recommendations for stepped
modules. In other cases, the interface friction angle is taken as 1/2 of the retained soil friction angle.
13 The aggregate infill weight and the weight of the soil wedge (when extended blocks are included) are
reduced to 80 percent of actual when calculating overturning resistance. If all of the block cells on the
bottom course are filled with concrete (including the center void), the ratio may be increased to 100% (see
variable in cell O11). Note that AASTHO recommends a maximum unit weight of 17.3 kN/m for the unit fill.
14 The toe embedment should typically be at least 5% of the differential wall height (exposed backfill height/20).
If the grade slopes away from the toe, the embedment should be increased. The suggested minimum
embedment can be expressed as H'/(20*s/6) where H' is the exposed backfill height and s is the horizontal
run per unit of slope (sH:1V). For example, the embedment for a 3H:1V toe slope would be H'/10. Minimum
embedment should be 150 to 225 mm for private projects, 600 mm for AASHTO conventional design, and
300 to 600 mm for AASHTO LRFD design.
S T O N E S T R O N G L L C
15 The base materials, configuration, and properties are entered to the right of the printable space. Sliding
resistance across the surface of the base is evaluated using a composit friction coefficient based on the
contributory area for each interface combination. The calculated coefficient can be overridden by entering a
composite coefficient in the OVERRIDE entry cell. If ANY value is entered in this cell, it will be used to
calculate the sliding resistence regardless of the other values entered. The sliding resistence routine also
includes evaluation of sliding failure throught the foundation soils below the base, and the lower result is
reported as the sliding resistance Rs.
16 The aggregate base thickness may be adjusted for site and other conditions. The base thickness is typically
set at 225 mm, but may be reduced to 150 mm for shorter walls (1.8 m or less) or for hard and stable
foundation soil conditions. In soft conditions with lower allowable bearing pressures, the contact pressure
may be reduced by increasing the thickness of the granular base. The horizontal dimension of the base
should be set to provide a minimum projection in front of the face equal to 1/2 of the base thickness plus 75
to 150 mm inches for construction tolerance. The rear projection of the base behind the tail should provide
at least 75 to 150 mm for construction tolerance.
17 The thickness of a concrete base is typically set at 150 mm unless site conditions dictate a thicker base to
distribute the wall weight over soft soils. When an unreinforced concrete base is used, the front projection of
the footing should be at least equal to the concrete thickness. For calculating the equivalent bearing width
and the contact pressure, a 1:1 distribution is taken through the unreinforced concrete base instead of the
1:2 distribution traditionally used for an aggregate base. If a reinforced concrete footing is used, the front
projection dimension is used to calculate the equivalent bearing width regardless of the thickness.
18 An allowable bearing pressure may be entered if specified by the geotechnical report or other requirements.
This allowable bearing pressure will override the calculation of allowable bearing pressure based on the
entered properties of the foundation soil. If a net allowable bearing pressure is indicated, then the
overburden at the toe will be added to determine the gross allowable bearing pressure. If unsure as to
whether the specified bearing pressure is net allowable, select "gross" to indicate gross allowable
(conservative). If an allowable bearing pressure is not entered, bearing capacity is calculated using the
Vesic equation. The calculation includes the thickness of the aggregate base and the cover depth in the
embedment factor Df.
S T O N E S T R O N G L L C
18 An allowable bearing pressure may be entered if specified by the geotechnical report or other requirements.
This allowable bearing pressure will override the calculation of allowable bearing pressure based on the
entered properties of the foundation soil. If a net allowable bearing pressure is indicated, then the
overburden at the toe will be added to determine the gross allowable bearing pressure. If unsure as to
whether the specified bearing pressure is net allowable, select "gross" to indicate gross allowable
(conservative). If an allowable bearing pressure is not entered, bearing capacity is calculated using the
Vesic equation. The calculation includes the thickness of the aggregate base and the cover depth in the
embedment factor Df.
19 Internal stability analysis can be performed at any unit interface within the wall. To switch to internal
analysis, select "internal" in cell O10. At a minimum, internal stability should be checked at each change in
module size (i.e. top of Mass Extender or tail extension) and for all courses where lateral loads are applied
above the wall or for seismic load cases. Interface shear properties are taken from full scale testing.
20 Seismic analysis follows pseudo-static Mononobe-Okabe methodology incorporated into the trial wedge
analysis. Live load surcharges and lateral loads at the top of the wall are omitted for the seismic load case.
Required safety factors are taken as 3/4 of the indicated static condition safety factors. The seismic
acceleration PGA is the peak ground acceleration, expressed as a fraction of gravity.
21 The Block Library includes all standard Stone Strong units and some custom or cast in place elements. The
user should verify availability of individual units from the precaster/dealer in the area of the project. The
Block Library also includes cast in place concrete coping, and the dimensions may be edited by the user. A
user entry section is also available to enter custom block units for unique applications.
S T O N E S T R O N G L L C
22 The LRFD version follows the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specification (4th Edition, 2007). Load and
Resistance Factor Design methodology applies separate factors to address the variability of the applied
loads, materials, and design components that provide support. The factored loads must be less than the
factored resistance to satisfy the design requirements. Specific methods, procedures, equations, and
nomenclature can be found in the LRFD Design Methodology and LRFD Example Calculations in the
Engineering Manual and available on the Stone Strong web site www.StoneStrong.com.
23 A table of load and resistance factors used in the LRFD spreadsheet is included on page 2 of the program
output. These are based upon tables 3.4.1-1 and 3.4.1-2 in the AASHTO LRFD specification. Calculations
are provided for relevent load cases - Strength I (a & b variations), Strength II, Strength IV, Extreme Event I
(seismic), Extreme Event II (collision), and Service I. For this type of Precast Modular Block (PMB) system,
load cases Strength I and Extreme Event I (seismic) will typically control design. Results are summarized
for load case Strength I (relevent behaviors from a or b cases) and Extreme Event I (seismic, if applicable).
Detailed calculations for all of the load cases are presented in tabular form below the summary. If these
additional calculations indicate stabiltiy problems, a flag occurs in the Results summary.
24 Lateral loads at the top of the wall are assumed to be guardrail or barrier collision loads in the LRFD analysis
(treated as live loads in conventional analysis). Collision loads are treated in Extreme Event II load case. If
the lateral load is a different type of loading, this may be investigated by editing the load factor CT and load
case designation. Note that the last 2 load case headings and the CT load factor designation are not
protected and can be edited by the user, as can all of the individual load factor values.
S T O N E S T R O N G L L C S T O N E S T R O N G L L C
S T O N E S T R O N G L L C S T O N E S T R O N G L L C
S T O N E S T R O N G L L C S T O N E S T R O N G L L C
STONE STRONG GRAVITY CALCULATIONS - ver 4.8
Project Name:
Gravity Retaining Wall Design
Location:
Stone Strong, Lincoln, NE
Job#:
08110.00
Section:
Trial Data
Calc by:
Author 7/23/14 19:12
Notes
Wall Configuration
setback (mm) block units unit fill soil wedge CIP Extension
block w (mm) h (m) face tail Wb (kN) xb (mm) Wa (kN) xa (mm) Ws (kN) xs (mm) we (mm) ht
6
1118 0.46 202 202 5.8 685 4.3 799
24
1118 0.91 101 101 10.9 589 8.8 731
24
1118 0.91 0 0 10.9 488 8.8 630
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0
R
e
s
u
l
t
a
n
t

(
k
N
)
H
e
i
g
h
t

(
m
)
Distance from Face (m)
S T O N E S T R O N G L L C
24
1118 0.91 101 101 10.9 589 8.8 731
24
1118 0.91 0 0 10.9 488 8.8 630
OK!
1118 2.29 202 202 27.7 570 21.8 704 0.0 0
backfill height
2.29
m
=
6.31 deg
exposed height 2.06 m
'=
6.31 deg
Retained Soil 20.00 kN/m
3
interface friction angle
Aggregate Unit Fill
26
deg

13.0 deg
17.3 kN/m
3
Foundation Soil 20.00 kN/m
3
base embedment
225
mm
allowable bearing pressure c' kPa base thickness
225
mm
(net)
n/a
kPa (if specified)
26
deg agg/conc/reinf base
agg

b 0.69
Seismic Load
PGA G kh 0.00
Toe Slope
H:1V slope
Backfill Slope & Surcharge
rise in grade LL surcharge
effective slope H:1V slope failure plane

52.00 deg avg LL q 0 kPa

0.0 deg zone of influence 2.90 m

Tier Height
length 1
10
m (horizontal) m kPa
m
length 2 m (horizontal) m kPa
m
kPa
kPa
length 3 m (horizontal) m
m
length 4 m (horizontal) m
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0
R
e
s
u
l
t
a
n
t

(
k
N
)
H
e
i
g
h
t

(
m
)
Distance from Face (m)
S T O N E S T R O N G L L C
STONE STRONG GRAVITY CALCULATIONS - ver 4.8
Project Name:
Gravity Retaining Wall Design
Location:
Stone Strong, Lincoln, NE
Job#:
08110.00
Section:
Trial Data
Calc by:
Author 7/23/14 19:12
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0
R
e
s
u
l
t
a
n
t

(
k
N
)
H
e
i
g
h
t

(
m
)
Distance from Face (m)
Page 2 of 2
Analysis Qlh = 0.00 kN e= 0.13 m
Ka = 0.312 Qlv = 0.00 kN

KAE = 0.000 Bf' = 1.04 m
Ph = 16.16 kN Rs = 25.09 kN PIR = 0.00 kN eeq= 0.13 m
Pv = 1.90 kN qult = 237 kPa PAEh = 0.00 kN Bf'eq = 1.04 m
Results Overturning:
Desired FS = 1.5
Actual FS= 2.46 OK!
Sliding:
Desired FS = 1.5
Actual FS= 1.55 OK!
Bearing Capacity:
Desired FS = 2
Actual FS= 4.41 OK!
qall = 119 kPa qc = 54 kPa
qall = qc =
S T O N E S T R O N G L L C
Ground Surface & Trial Wedge Plot
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0
R
e
s
u
l
t
a
n
t

(
k
N
)
H
e
i
g
h
t

(
m
)
Distance from Face (m)
S T O N E S T R O N G L L C
STONE STRONG GRAVITY CALCULATIONS - ver 4.8
Project Name:
Gravity Retaining Wall Design
Location:
Stone Strong, Lincoln, NE
Job#:
08110.00
Section:
Trial Data
Calc by:
Author 7/23/14 19:12
Notes
Wall Configuration
setback (mm) block units unit fill soil wedge CIP Extension
block w (mm) h (m) face tail Wb (kN) xb (mm) Wa (kN) xa (mm) Ws (kN) xs (mm) we (mm) ht
6
1118 0.46 202 202 5.8 735 4.3 799
24
1118 0.91 101 101 10.9 639 8.8 731
24
1118 0.91 0 0 10.9 538 8.8 630
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0
R
e
s
u
l
t
a
n
t

(
k
N
)
H
e
i
g
h
t

(
m
)
Distance from Face (m)
S T O N E S T R O N G L L C
24
1118 0.91 101 101 10.9 639 8.8 731
24
1118 0.91 0 0 10.9 538 8.8 630
OK!
1118 2.29 202 202 27.7 620 21.8 704 0.0 0
backfill height
2.29
m
=
6.31 deg
exposed height 1.99 m
'=
6.31 deg
Retained Soil 20.00 kN/m
3
interface friction angle
Aggregate Unit Fill
30
deg

15.0 deg
17.3 kN/m
3
Foundation Soil 20.00 kN/m
3
base embedment
300
mm
allowable bearing pressure c' kPa base thickness
225
mm
(gross)
n/a
kPa (if specified)
30
deg agg/conc/reinf base
agg

b 0.69
Seismic Load
PGA G
k
h 0.00
Toe Slope
H:1V slope
Backfill Slope & Surcharge
rise in grade LL surcharge
effective slope H:1V slope failure plane

54.30 deg avg LL q 0 kPa

0.0 deg zone of influence 2.76 m

length 4 m (horizontal) m
length 3 m (horizontal) m
kPa
m
kPa
m
kPa
kPa
m
length 2 m (horizontal) m
length 1
10
m (horizontal) m
Tier Height
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0
R
e
s
u
l
t
a
n
t

(
k
N
)
H
e
i
g
h
t

(
m
)
Distance from Face (m)
S T O N E S T R O N G L L C
STONE STRONG GRAVITY CALCULATIONS - ver 4.8
Project Name:
Gravity Retaining Wall Design
Location:
Stone Strong, Lincoln, NE
Job#:
08110.00
Section:
Trial Data
Calc by:
Author 7/23/14 19:12
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0
R
e
s
u
l
t
a
n
t

(
k
N
)
H
e
i
g
h
t

(
m
)
Distance from Face (m)
Page 2 of 2
Ground Surface &
Trial Wedge Plot
Unfactored Loads
Ka = 0.260
Ph = 13.41 kN
Pv = 2.05 kN
Qlh = 0.00 kN
Qlv = 0.00 kN

KAE = 0.000
PIR = 0.00 kN
PAEh = 0.00 kN
PAEv = 0.00 kN
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0
R
e
s
u
l
t
a
n
t

(
k
N
)
H
e
i
g
h
t

(
m
)
Distance from Face (m)
S T O N E S T R O N G L L C
Load Cases: Strngth Strngth Strngth Extrme Extrme Service
I-a I-b IV I (EQ) II (CT) I
Factored Loading
Overturning: 15.3 15.3 15.3 10.2 10.2 10.2 kN-m
OK!
Sliding: 20.1 20.1 20.1 13.4 13.4 13.4 kN
OK!
Bearing: 56.8 65.9 70.3 48.0 48.0 48.0 kPa
OK!
e= 0.20 0.13 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 m
OK!
Bf' = 1.00 1.14 1.17 1.19 1.19 1.19 m
Factored Resistance
Overturning: 31.4 41.8 46.1 31.9 31.9 31.9 kN-m
Sliding: 25.9 34.9 38.5 29.8 29.8 29.8 kN
Bearing: 187.3 201.4 204.5 458.9 458.9 458.9 kPa
(@ top of base) Max e: 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.37 0.37 0.28 m
Load & Resistance Factors LL
1.75 1.75 0.00 0.00 0.50 1.00
EH
1.50 1.50 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00
EQ
0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
CT
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
LL Surcharge over Wall
0.00 1.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
DC
0.90 1.25 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00
EV
1.00 1.35 1.35 1.00 1.00 1.00
BC
0.45 0.45 0.45 1.00 1.00 1.00

precast to agg
0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00

CIP to agg/soil
0.80 0.80 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00

soil to soil
0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00

precast to precast
0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00
Distance from Face (m)
S T O N E S T R O N G L L C
Block Library
3/1/2013
Block Conc. Wt. Void Vol Length Height Unit Width Lift Align xc xv Special
Type Description (kN) (m
3
) (m) (m) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) Top
6 6SF unit (6 square feet) 7.12 0.30 1.22 0.46 1,118 483 432 533 597
24 24SF unit (24 square feet) 26.69 1.24 2.44 0.91 1,118 533 432 538 630
24-ME 24SF Mass Extender unit 44.48 1.29 2.44 0.91 1,422 533 432 831 655
24-M6 24SF w/ 150mm Mass Extender (check availability) 35.58 1.26 2.44 0.91 1,270 533 432 977 643
24-M18 24SF w/ 450mm Mass Extender (check availability) 53.38 1.29 2.44 0.91 1,575 533 432 1,269 672
24-M24 24SF w/ 600mm Mass Extender (check availability) 62.27 1.31 2.44 0.91 1,727 533 432 1,123 663
62 62HD unit (24 square feet) 30.49 2.15 2.44 0.91 1,575 533 432 739 838
86 86HD unit (24 square feet) 34.22 3.26 2.44 0.91 2,184 533 432 1,016 1,146
Alternate top units (not typically used - regular 24SF top unit is used in most applications, analyzed as regular 24 SF unit)
Cap Cap unit 7.12 0.00 2.44 0.18 813 406 406 406 Yes
DF Dual Face unit 15.57 0.00 2.44 0.46 711 356 356 356 356 Yes
Cast-in-place coping (overhang would be 480 mm less than the Alignment dimension entered - custom coping may be entered below)
300 cp cast-in-place concrete coping 8.75 1.00 0.30 1280 680 640 Yes
450 cp cast-in-place concrete coping 13.12 1.00 0.45 1280 680 640 Yes 450 cp cast-in-place concrete coping 13.12 1.00 0.45 1280 680 640 Yes
600 cp cast-in-place concrete coping 17.50 1.00 0.60 1280 680 640 Yes
750 cp cast-in-place concrete coping 21.87 1.00 0.75 1280 680 640 Yes
coping custom cast-in-place concrete coping 11.66 1.00 0.40 1280 680 640 Yes
Vertical stack units (modified recess and face to permit construction of a vertical face)
V6 6SF unit (6 square feet) 7.12 0.30 1.22 0.46 1,118 533 533 533 597
V24 24SF unit (24 square feet) 26.69 1.24 2.44 0.91 1,118 533 533 538 630
V24-ME 24SF Mass Extender unit 44.48 1.29 2.44 0.91 1,422 533 533 831 655
V24-M6 24SF w/ 150mm Mass Extender (check availability) 35.58 1.26 2.44 0.91 1,270 533 533 977 643
V24-M18 24SF w/ 450mm Mass Extender (check availability) 53.38 1.29 2.44 0.91 1,575 533 533 1,269 672
V24-M24 24SF w/ 600mm Mass Extender (check availability) 62.27 1.31 2.44 0.91 1,727 533 533 1,123 663
V62 62HD unit (24 square feet) 30.49 2.15 2.44 0.91 1,575 533 533 739 838
V86 86HD unit (24 square feet) 34.22 3.26 2.44 0.91 2,184 533 533 1,016 1,146
Green Wall units (increased setback - use for green wall or as isolated planter block)
G6 6SF unit set behind loops (6 square feet) 7.12 0.30 1.22 0.46 1,118 483 -114.0 533 597
G24 24SF unit set behind loops (24 square feet) 26.69 1.23 2.44 0.91 1,118 533 -114.0 538 630
Custom user entered elements below (use for any dealer specific variances from above default dimensions/weights)