Pharmaceutical Technology - A Risk-Based Approach To Product and Process Quality in Spray Drying

7/23/2014 Pharmaceutical Technology: A Risk-Based Approach to Product and Process Quality in Spray Drying
http://license.icopyright.net/user/viewFreeUse.act?fuid=MTgzMDk4MTQ%3D 1/9
PHOTO COURTESY OF NIRO.
May 1, 2008
A Risk-Based Approach to Product and Process Quality in
Spray Drying
By Henrik Schwartzbach
Process designs and control strategies can be improved by adopting a risk-based approach
to product quality. The author describes how this approach can be applied to spray-drying
operations.
Taking a risk-based approach to product quality is an excellent way to uncover
potential weaknesses in process designs or control strategies. A risk assessment is
different from an impact assessment because the former considers the severity and
the likelihood of the impact. A properly performed risk assessment is a valuable tool in
designing experiments, defining design space, and planning design-of-control
strategy. The ultimate goal of risk assessment is not only to achieve the desired
quality, but also to produce predictable and consistent quality.
Target product quality and product-quality consistency
The target product quality in this instance may be the desired product quality for full-
scale production or a quality that is sufficient for the current scale and stage of development. Product-quality
variability is a common problem that can be difficult to solve. Product-quality risk assessment is an effective
tool to reduce product-quality variability.
Quality impact assessment
The first stage of performing a risk assessment is identifying potential hazards. A hazard is something that
influences the process directly or indirectly (e.g., materials of construction or instrumentation). A typical impact
assessment will identify hazards, the type of hazards, and the documentation required such as material or
calibration certificates.
Impact assessments are typically designed to identify potential hazards, but not the severity or frequency of
exposure to the identified hazards. Since neither the severity nor the frequency of the hazards is identified, an
impact assessment is inadequate for designing future experiments or control strategies.
Quality risk assessment
Fi gure 1
Risk is a combination of the severity of exposure to a hazard and the frequency of being exposed. Being struck
by lighting is a good example of a low-risk hazard. Despite the severity of the hazard, the likelihood of it
happening is small.
A product-quality risk assessment requires both product and process understanding to be performed
effectively. Consequently, it is best performed after process development has been completed. Ideally, the
target product quality is known at that point, including the extent to which the different product-quality attributes
can vary without unacceptable quality loss. The limits of acceptable variability are rarely known for all product
attributes, however. A quality risk assessment can often identify the aspects of the process that require further
investigation. Quality risk assessment must be included in the experimental design or receive special attention
in the control strategy.
It is important that personnel have adequate general understanding of the process type (in this case, spray
drying), especially if the process will be scaled up at a later stage.
Applying control strategy
An ideal control strategy would allow large input variation but maintain low output variability. Unfortunately,
these criteria are rarely met in the real world. A good control strategy would allow some input variation,
maintain low output variability, and provide early warning of deviations. The success of such a control strategy
is ultimately limited to known input variation. Process analytical technology (PAT) is a valuable tool in
identifying input variation that previously was overlooked or deemed insignificant (because of multivariate
effects, for example).
The control strategy can be simplified if the product-feed variations are small, as they frequently are. In this
case, a good control strategy is to fix the process parameters that have the greatest product-quality impact by
controlled variations in the process parameters with the least product-quality impact.
Spray drying
In a spray dryer, a liquid feed (e.g., solution, suspension, or emulsion) is atomized into a spray of fine droplets
and suspended in gas while drying. Spray drying is a fast method of drying because of the product's large
surface area and high heat-transfer coefficients. The product's large surface area also enables drying at low
to moderate temperatures. The rapid drying and consequent fast stabilization at moderate temperatures make
spray drying feasible for heat-sensitive materials.
Spray dryers must always be cleaned and sometimes sterilized. These and other subprocesses are often as
critical as the main drying process, but are not part of the assessment as described below.
Identifying the important process parameters
In a spray dryer, droplets or particles are dried while they are suspended in
the drying gas. During the drying process, heat is transferred from the drying
gas surrounding the droplets or particles, and solvent evaporates from the
droplet or particle surface into the surrounding drying gas (see Figure 1). The
process also involves various complex diffusion processes, most of which are
specific to the productsolvent combination used. This complexity makes
liquid-feed composition an important part of early process development.
Because the liquid-feed composition rarely can be used for process-control
purposes, however, the parameters available for process control are drying
temperature, drying-gas humidity, and droplet size.
The conditions under which the droplets are transformed into particles influence the final solvent content and
the particle morphology.
Drying temperature
In a spray dryer, it is important to distinguish between dryer-inlet temperature,
product temperature, drying temperature, and dryer-outlet temperature. In a
Fi gure 2
Fi gure 3
well-designed cocurrent spray dryer, the intense mixing of spray and drying
gas results in fast cooling of the drying gas by the evaporation of solvent. The
end result is that the temperature in the drying chamber is practically equal to
the spray-dryer outlet temperature. This parity can be measured and
calculated with computational fluid-dynamic models (see Figure 2).
Because of the evaporation of solvent from the product, the droplet or product
temperature remains lower than the spray-dryer outlet temperature during the
entire drying process. The droplet or product temperature also remains lower
than the spray-dryer outlet temperature in the high-temperature region at the drying-gas inlet, where the rate
of evaporation is at its highest and the droplet temperature is at its lowest (i.e., approaching the wet-bulb
temperature). The product temperature at the discharge is typically between 5 and 20 C colder than the
drying-gas temperature at the outlet.
The importance of the drying-gas temperature at the spray-dryer outlet is
clearly seen in experiments where the correlation between product
characteristics and outlet temperature is stronger than most other process
variables. The outlet's drying-gas temperature is usually fixed at a product-
specific set point by a feedback control loop. The feedback loop normally
adjusts the inlet's drying-gas temperature or the liquid-feed rate to maintain
the outlet's drying-gas temperature at the set point (see Figure 3).
Drying-gas humidity
The solvent-vapor content in the drying gas is the sum of the solvent-vapor content in the inlet drying gas and
the evaporated solvent. In most applications, the evaporated solvent is the major contributor. Because the
evaporation rate is proportional to the difference between the inlet and outlet drying-gas temperature, an
increase in the inlet drying-gas temperature (at constant outlet drying-gas temperature) results in an increase
in drying-gas solvent-vapor content.
The control of the inlet's drying-gas temperature depends on the control strategy applied for the outlet's
drying-gas temperature. When the outlet drying-gas feedback loop adjusts the inlet's drying-gas temperature,
the fixed set point for the liquid-feed rate indirectly sets the inlet's drying-gas temperature level (see figure 3).
Alternatively, a feedback loop maintains the inlet's drying-gas temperature at the set point by adjusting the
main process gas heater.
The solvent-vapor content in the inlet drying gas is controlled effectively and accurately by adjusting the
condenser's outlet gas temperature (i.e., the dew point of the gas). In applications that use ambient air as the
drying gas, the condenser is replaced by a dehumidifier or sometimes completely omitted.
Droplet size
Droplet size is controlled through the atomization process as long as suspended particles in the liquid feed are
small compared with the droplets created. Atomization is a complex but reproducible process in which droplet
size and droplet-size distribution depend mainly on the rheology of the liquid feed, the energy applied, and the
liquid-feed rate. The atomization energy can be applied and controlled in various ways such as adjusting the
speed of a spinning wheel in a rotary atomizer, the flow of a gas in a two-fluid nozzle, and the liquid-feed
pressure in a pressure nozzle (see Figure 3). For a given pressure nozzle and liquid feed, the liquid-feed rate
and the liquid-feed pressure are mutually dependent. Either of them can be used in a feedback loop to the
feed pump to maintain constant atomization conditions and thereby constant droplet size and droplet-size
distributionas long as the liquid-feed rheology remains constant.
Process-gas flow rate
Spray dryers are generally designed to work correctly within a limited range of drying-gas flow rates: typically
1020%. The process parameters that have been selected as critical above, however (i.e., inlet's drying-gas
temperature, outlet's drying-gas temperature, and feed rate), are sufficient to calculate the heat and balance
across the system. The drying-gas flow rate is thus a dependent process parameter, not a variable process
parameter.
Though the drying-gas flow rate is a dependent process parameter, it is impractical to control it according to
real-time mass-balance and heat calculations. A simple feedback loop between a gas-flow measurement and
the main process gas fan works just as effectively. Gas-flow measurement in this case does not require an
accurate absolute measurement: a reproducible relative measurement also suffices.
Product-quality risk assessment
Assessments of risk are relative. A risk's magnitude is gauged in comparison with other risks, and "high risk" is
relative.
Process measurements and control loops. In most spray-drying applications, a strong, reproducible
correlation exists between product quality attributes that are influenced by the process parameters and the
basic process measurements (e.g., temperature, pressure, and flow). Basic process measurements are
reliable. Regular calibration and preventive maintenance reduce the risk of deviations even further. The
undetected failure of a process measurement or control loop is not likely. Because the process parameters
must satisfy the heat and mass balance, an undetected error in one instrument would cause other process
measurements to deviate from the normal values.
Process measurements and control loops are effective and reliable process controls and constitute a low risk.
A few spray-drying applications do not exhibit an adequately reproducible correlation between the product-
quality attributes that are influenced by process parameters and the basic process measurements. In those
cases, the process measurements and control loops are not effective for controlling the process and constitute
a high risk.
Variation in feed characteristics. Dried products' characteristics change with liquid-feed variations. The
process impact of long-term variations in feed characteristics can be difficult to evaluate because the varations
are complex and frequently multivariate. One problem is that a limited number of raw-material batches are
used in product development, and some sources of variability are easily missed or deemed insignificant.
The combination of control loops that rely on constant response to constant conditions and the difficulty in
detecting and analyzing variations in the liquid feed make liquid-feed variations a moderate risk.
In cases with simple liquid feeds (e.g., a solution of one simple chemical compound), the liquid-feed variations
become a low risk.
Mechanical errors. Mechanical failures and assembly errors (e.g., missing or damaged gaskets) may cause
contamination, deposits, or malfunctions that are not readily detectable. Operator training, standard operating
procedures, and preventive maintenance reduce the risk of error, but a high risk of mechanical errors remains.
Applying control strategy
Process measurements and control loops. The process measurements and control loops are effective
and reliable. A real-time heat and mass-balance calculation based on the process measurements is used to
detect instruments that need calibration or certain liquid-feed abnormalities.
Spray-drying applications with an inadequate correlation between product-quality attributes and the basic
process measurements require careful reevaluation of the process design space. The lack of correlation is
frequently explained by the choice of a marginal or unsustainable operating point.
For example, an operation close to the limits for drying often results in particle
agglomeration in the drying chamber and a high risk of deposits or irregular
powder discharge (see Figure 4). Furthermore, single particles rarely have the
same performance as agglomerates of the same size. The result is a poor
correlation between atomization conditions and particle size because the
drying conditions are marginalized typically by lowering the outlet drying-gas
temperature.
Fi gure 4
Fi gure 5
Fine powders and fragile particles may change size dramatically when they are
collected in a cyclone. Cyclones have a limited efficiency in collecting fine
powders. As a result, a reduced particle size may appear as a reduction in
cyclone yield and not as the expected reduction in particle size. On the other
hand, fragile particles may break when collected in a cyclone. In extreme
cases, attempts to increase the particle size through changes in atomization
conditions make the particles even more fragile. Again, the result is a poor
correlation between atomization conditions and particle size. The lack of
correlation appears to stem from the drying-gas flow rate. The real cause,
however, is a poor choice of the cyclone for the application.
Product may change after discharge if the conditions in the product container are not compatible with the
product. When the product changes, it reflects the process conditions in the container, not in the spray dryer.
Some product characteristics to monitor are particle size (some products are likely to form lumps or
agglomerate), residual moisture (reabsorption of solvent vapor because of the increase in relative humidity as
the surrounding gas cools down), amorphousness (crystal growth in products kept at temperatures above
glass-transition temperature), and activity or impurities (product is kept at an excessively high temperature for
too long).
Variation in feed characteristics. The process impact of long-term variations in feed characteristics can be
evaluated using PAT. In line or on line liquid-feed and final-product monitoring are ideal for establishing a
correlation between feed properties and final-product properties. Unfortunately, it is time consuming to set up
the monitoring system and analyze the collected data.
A fully developed liquid-feed and product-monitoring system can be used as an advanced feed-forward or
feedback system to adjust operating parameters. Such a system can reduce the consistency requirements for
the liquid feed and, at the same time, improve the consistency of the final product.
A system with only in line or on line final-product monitoring still requires a liquid feed with a high level of
consistency. Even though, in most cases, variability is best controlled at its source, such a system still provides
benefits in processes with a tight design space or in a development environment where real-time data allow the
process to be adjusted quickly. The danger in such a system is when the cause of the disturbance is not
known.
The choice of measurement type and location is naturally application-
dependent. An in line or on line measuring device is generally able to provide
substantially more detailed information than traditional sampling. For example,
an on line particle-size measurement shows the effect of the automated
hammers on the drying chamber (see Figure 5).
Mechanical errors. Mechanical failures frequently are not part of a process-
control strategy but are one of the most common reasons for process
deviations. A pressure nozzle, for example, must be clean and without leaks to
work as intended. Pressure nozzles, however, often start to leak because they have been damaged, worn out,
or assembled with insufficient care. The leak causes the nozzle to foul, disturb the spray, change the particle
size, create deposits, and ultimately cause a premature shutdown. Monitoring and recording nozzles with a
camera provide early warnings and facilitate fault identification.
Summary
A risk-based approach to process design provides valuable insight to the areas where process design and
control strategy are most likely to fail. Interestingly enough, it is frequently not the high-risk areas that
personnel devote most of their attention to before making a risk assessment. In many cases, the most effective
process monitoring is achieved though a blend of technologies.
Subprocesses such as cleaning can and should be evaluated in the same way as the main process and can
be improved by means similar to those described above.
Henrik Schwartzbach is a senior process technologist at Niro A/S GEA Pharma Systems, Gladsaxevej 305,
2860 Soeborg, Denmark, tel. +45 39 54 54 54, henrik.schwartzbach@geapharmasystems.com
1
PHOTO COURTESY OF NIRO.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
2008 Advanstar Communications Inc.. Permission granted f or up to 5 copies. All rights reserved.
You may f orward this article or get additional permissions by typing http://license.icopyright.net/3.7458?
icx_id=514842 into any web browser. Advanstar Communications Inc. and Pharmaceutical Technology logos are registered
trademarks of Advanstar Communications Inc. The iCopyright logo is a registered trademark of iCopyright, Inc.
Figure 4
Figure 5
References
1. henrik.schwartzbach@geapharmasystems.com

Pharmaceutical Technology - A Risk-Based Approach To Product and Process Quality in Spray Drying

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pharmaceutical Technology - A Risk-Based Approach To Product and Process Quality in Spray Drying

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

7/23/2014 Pharmaceutical Technology: A Risk-Based Approach to Product and Process Quality in Spray Drying

You might also like