The truss design procedure is essentially the same one presented in the previous sections. However, the designer must always keep in mind the overall system and must add all effects for the overall system. The amounts of reinforcement required are compared with those obtained using the current AASHTO Standard Specifications (2).
Original Description:
Original Title
Proposed Design Procedures for Shear and Torsion in Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Ramirez_part35
The truss design procedure is essentially the same one presented in the previous sections. However, the designer must always keep in mind the overall system and must add all effects for the overall system. The amounts of reinforcement required are compared with those obtained using the current AASHTO Standard Specifications (2).
The truss design procedure is essentially the same one presented in the previous sections. However, the designer must always keep in mind the overall system and must add all effects for the overall system. The amounts of reinforcement required are compared with those obtained using the current AASHTO Standard Specifications (2).
The inclination of the compression diagonals in all the walls of
the space truss has to be within the limits 25 0 s.. Q's.. 65 0 where Q'is the angle of inclination of the truss compression diagonals. After the truss model has been selected, the design procedure is essentially the same one presented in the previous sections. Although the computations can be carried out separately for each wall of the member, the designer must always keep in mind the overall system and must add all effects for the overall system. This is of special significance for example when dimensioning the longitudinal chords of the truss model as well as in the overall detailing of the member since it must behave as a unit. 4.3 Design Example of Reinforced Concrete Rectangular Box Beam under Combined Torsion, Bending, and Shear In this secton the design of the reinforced concrete box section shown in Fig. 4.13a subj ected to comb ined shear, bend ing and tor sion, as shown in Fig. 4.13b, is carried out using the truss approach. The amounts of reinforcement required using the truss model design procedure are compared with those obtained using the current AASHTO Standard Specifications (2). Ex hib it 4-1 sho ws the de ta 11 ed c alcula tion s required for design of this member using the truss analogy. The calculations presented in this exhibit are amplified and explained in this section to introduce the reader to the design method in full detail. However, in practical application by an experienced designer only the calculations shown in the exhibit and the referenced tables would be needed. 122 (U) i.c--4" f'c = 4000 ps i IB" (L) (R) fy= 60000 psi (All reinforcement) (8) I II c.c.= .5 I IB" ~ (a) Cross section 45.5'1 1 ~ (v u ) ~ I 4 5 5 k 3550in- k A1111il11 r!ll ~ {Mu l 1 1 1 1 H 1 I I I 11 150 in. -k (b) Actions Fig. 4.13 Actions on the reinforced concrete box beam 123 4.3.1 Preliminary Flexure Design. As in any usual design procedure proportioning and selection of reinforcement as controlled by flexure will be conducted first (1,2). The flexure design procedure will be the same in the Truss Model and ACII AASHTO design approaches. A section containing both tension and compression reinforcement will be selected because the presence of compression reinforcement helps to adequately anchor web reinforcement as well as to control creep deflections. In addition, the presence of a torsional moment might require some tension reinforcement in the flexural compression face (Top (U)) of the member. In this flexural design example it is assumed that the overall dimension are known (18 x 18 in.), as well as the material properties ~ (4000 psi) and fy (60,000 psi). The effective depth d, taken as the distance between the extreme compression fiber and the centroid of the longitudinal tension reinforcement, is evaluated assuming a 1.5 in. clear cover, a f/4 stirrup, and a fig longitudinal bar. Thus, d = 18 - 0.56 - 0.5 - 1.5 = 15.44 in. The distance between the centroid of the compression reinforcement and the extreme compression fiber "d" is evaluated assuming a clear cover of 1.5 in., a 114 stirrup and a fl8 longitudinal bar. Hence, d' = 0.5" + 0.5" + 1.5" = 2.5 in. Detailed calculations for flexure are shown in Fig. 4.14. The preliminary flexure design for the midspan region of the simply supported box beam is shown in Fig. 4.15. Detailing of this longitudinal steel at other sections along the span of the member will 124
AI s
D = Q +
As AS1 As = As1 + As2i MN = MN1 + MN2 Assume As1 = 0.014 bd = 0.014(18)(15.44) = 3.89 in. 2 Check ductility 0.75 P bal = 0.016 > 0.014 OK C = T in(l): a = AS1fy/0.85f'cb = (3.89)(60)/0.85(4)(18) - 3.81" < 4" recto sec. MN1 = A s1 f y (d-a/2) = (3.89)(60)(15.4-3.81/2) = 3149 in-k MN2 = MN - MNl = 3550/0.9 - 3149 - 795 in-k d-d' = 15.44 - 2.5 = 12.94 in; c = alB 1 = 3.81/0.85 = 4.48" Strain diagram in compression zone: e' = s 0.003/c (c-2.5) - 0.003/4.48 (4.48-2.5) = 0.0014 f's = E e's = (29 x 10 3 )(0.0014) = 38.5 ksi Thus: MN2 = A s 2f y(d-d') and As2 = MN2/fy(d-d') As2 = 795/60 (12.94) = 1.02 in 2 C = T in (2): A'sf's = AS2fy; f's = 38.5 ksi A;s = As2fy/f'S = 1.02 (60)138.5 = 1.58 in 2 Thus use 2 #8 A's = 1.58 as top compression steel As = Asl + As2 = 3.89 + 1.02 = 4.91 in 2 Thus use 5 19 As = 5.00 in 2 as bottom tension steel. Fig. 4.14 Calculations for flexure at midspan section of the reinforced concrete box beam