WORD OF GOD

... through Bertha Dudde

8923
God corrects a big error ....
I want to give you a very i!ortant e"!#anation which shou#d
en#ighten those o$ you who are sti## convinced that evi# is
inherent in %e too& and that I have hence su!!osed#y created
beings with a## their bad instincts and attributes ....
'ou& who have to $ight against a## these instincts in order to
regain your origina# condition& did not eerge $ro %e #i(e that&
because i$ that were the case I wou#d have created a s!irit wor#d
which cou#d not be deeed to be in %y iage.
)verything eerged $ro %e in abso#ute !er$ection and has
reained !er$ect $or an in$inity.
*here$ore& i$ they were in %y image& in accordance with your
o!inion I %yse#$ wou#d have to have a## (inds o$ evi# attributes
within %yse#$& hence I wou#d have to be a God o$ dua#ity& Who
created good as we## as evi# siu#taneous#y ....
In this case& however& the beings cou#d not be considered to be
gui#ty& because they wou#d have detached these#ves $ro %e as
a resu#t o$ their inc#ination .... But then the act of Salvation by
+esus ,hrist wou#d not have been necessary either& because a
-sin. is an o$$ence against %e which& however& the being was
unable to coit since it was not created in any other way ....
hence& I %yse#$ wou#d have been the cause o$ this a##eged sin ....
I$ you be#ieve that a## o!!osites are inherent in the ost !er$ect
Being then you are contradicting yourse#ves& because !er$ection
has to be good& it cannot be associated with a## evi# attributes
because then it wou#d not be perfect any #onger ....
But every $a##en s!irit is burdened with the original sin which it
cannot eterna##y redee o$ its own accord .... /ence you can see
$ro this the enority and gravity o$ this sin against %e& so 0 I
su!!osed to have been the cause o$ it %yse#$1 O$ a sin which
deanded an act o$ ercy such as the huan being +esus has
acco!#ished1 .... Who rea#ised that this very sin had to be
redeeed one day $or the sa(e o$ 2ustice ....
One o$ the !urest ange# beings vo#unteered $or this act o$
atoneent in the (now#edge that the sin o$ a!ostasy $ro God
was the u#tiate o$$ence against /is #ove ....
0nd was I su!!osed to have su!!orted this sin %yse#$ by creating
beings with -a## o!!osites.1 In order to then& because o$ %y
induced sin& a(e the wa#( an e"cruciating#y !ain$u# !ath
through atter& which wou#d thus once again i!#y an utter#y evi#
Being but not the bound#ess #ove a o$ su!ree#y !er$ect God and
,reator Who wants to be Father to you a##.
)verything that has resu#ted $ro the origina# sin is on account o$
%y adversary.s doing& who has been the cause hise#$& who has
i!#anted you with a## evi# instincts and who was ab#e to do so
the oent you re2ected %y eission o$ #ove and thus had no
$urther strength to resist hi.
0s #ong as you su!!ort this isguided teaching you sti## have a
very obscured conce!t o$ %e .... as #ong as you #oo( $or the
origin o$ evi# in %e you do not yet understand ,hrist.s act o$
3a#vation !ro!er#y .... Because you can on#y s!ea( o$ the
original sin when you are $u##y res!onsib#e $or it .... and this
wou#d not be the case i$ I had created you with the tendency o$
sin a#ready within yourse#ves.
/owever& since you are burdened with the original sin& $ro
which you can on#y be redeeed by +esus ,hrist& but cannot
accuse %e o$ any in2ustice& it is c#ear#y se#$4evident that the sin
against %e was coitted by you yourse#ves& that %y adversary
has induced you to coit this sin& which you coitted
voluntarily and there$ore you are a#so $u##y res!onsib#e $or it ....
that you there$ore brought about a## !ast torents and su$$ering
yourse#ves and +esus ,hrist wi## he#! you to becoe $ree o$ this
gui#t ....
*o you& who want to serve %e by s!reading the truth& the act o$
creation has been e"tensive#y e"!#ained& as $ar as you are ab#e to
gras! it .... 0nd $ro a## this $o##ows that the s!irit wor#d was
origina##y created in co!#ete !er$ection& and that I was
e"tree#y ha!!y with the host o$ the $irst created s!irits $or an
eternity ....
But I have a#so (nown about %y $irst e"terna#i5ed s!irit.s
antagonis $or an eternity& I.ve (nown about his o!!osition and
the con$usion he wou#d cause aongst %y ear#iest s!irits ....
I (new o$ their a!ostasy $ro %e& but I had e"terna#i5ed hi as
%y iage with the same creative power and creative
strength .... and I did not sto! hi when he misused this
!ower and trans$erred a## o$ his bad attributes on to those who
$o##owed hi vo#untari#y& because I had a##owed the wi## o$ a##
beings to be $ree ....
0nd this e"!#ained the $a## into the abyss& on#y it occurred
vo#untari#y and was !articu#ar#y grave because the beings were
sti## within the #ight o$ awareness and yet they have acce!ted a##
evi# attributes which My adversary has ibued in the& but $or
which I Myself cannot be he#d res!onsib#e ....
0en
6ub#ished by $riends o$ new reve#ations o$ God 7 In$oration&
down#oad o$ a## trans#ated reve#ations& thee4boo(#ets at8
htt!899www.bertha4dudde.in$o9eng#ish9inde".ht#

htt!899en.bertha4dudde.org9