A tribological study of a series of retrieved Accord knee explants has been carried out. There was generally little damage to the highly polished metallic femoral components. A general polishing and smoothing of the ultra high molecular weight polyethylene meniscal components was observed.
A tribological study of a series of retrieved Accord knee explants has been carried out. There was generally little damage to the highly polished metallic femoral components. A general polishing and smoothing of the ultra high molecular weight polyethylene meniscal components was observed.
A tribological study of a series of retrieved Accord knee explants has been carried out. There was generally little damage to the highly polished metallic femoral components. A general polishing and smoothing of the ultra high molecular weight polyethylene meniscal components was observed.
e.EIII;;iez*, J. Fisher*, D. Dowson*, S.A. Sampath, R. Johnson* and . *Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK; University Department of Orthopaedics and Accident Surgery, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; *Knee Research Unit, Arrowepark Hospital, Upton, Wirral, Merseyside, L49 5PE, UK; * *DePuy International Ltd., St Anthonys Road, Leeds LSll SDT, UK ABSTRACT A tribological s&y of a series of 27 retrieved Accord meniscal bearing kneejoints has been carried out. Ihe roughness of the articulating sufaces of the men&al and thefemoral components was investigated, and thepenetration into the polyethylene meniscal component was determined. There was generally little damage to the highly polished metallic femoral components. A general polishing and smoothing of the ultra high molecular weight polyethylene meniscal components was observed, although therewas somesubsequent deterioration of the polyethylene surfaces in certain cases. The penetration rateof thefemoral components into themenisci was low, and was found to besimilar to that reportedfor other meniscal kneejoints. Keywords: Tribology, retrieval, knee prostheses Med. Eng. Phys., 1994, Vol. 16, 223-228, May INTRODUCTION The natural knee offers a complex range of move- ments with 150 of motion in flexion-extension, rotation, and translation in the anterior-posterior direction. In the more widely used total condylar artificial knees this range of movements is achieved by having relatively low conforming tibia1 and femoral components . This produces high stresses in the contact. In certain knee designs the high cyclic contact stresses can cause sub-surface fatigue and structural failure of the ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) component3. In some cases inadequate mechanical properties and poor quality UHMWPE have been acknowledged as accelerating factorsk7. Sub-surface fatigue can initiate several millimetres into the UHMWPE at the position of the maximum shear stress, with cracks propagating to the surface causing complete failure and break up of the UHMWPE component. This type of failure has been widely described as delamin- ation in the literature8~g. In addition structural failure can also initiate from stress concentrations arising from the metal tibia1 support or tray, which can lead to the complete breaking up of the polyethylene component. It is important to emphasize that this mode of failure and wear is not primarily a surface wear process, as it is not caused by relative motion of the surface asperities, and it initiates in the bulk of the material. In some total condylar knees it has been possible to reduce the levels of contact stress that cause structural failure, by increasing the conformity Correspondence and reprint requests: Dr J.L. Hailey 0 1994 Butterworth-Heinemann for BES 1350-4533/94/03223-06 of the components, but this can restrict the range of movements and impose biomechanical constraints. The meniscal bearing knee offers an alternative approach to overcoming the desi ated with total condylar knees p problems associ- . Memscal bearing knees achieve a wide range of motion by allowing articulation at both the femoro-meniscal and the tibio-meniscal surfaces. Figure 7 shows an Accord meniscal knee. The femoro-meniscal bearing surfaces are conforming and cylindrical in shape which gives rise to a large area of contact on both condyles in a correctly aligned knee. The tibio-meniscal surfaces are conical in shape and allow rotation of the polyethylene meniscal component with respect to the tibial tra . In most components the translation of the menisca ly component is constrained by a pin through the apex of the truncated conical surface. Thus the Accord meniscal knee permits flexion-extension at the femoro-meniscal bearing surface, and rotation at the tibio-meniscal surfaces. This allows more highly conforming bearing surfaces to be used and it has been postulated that reduced contact stresses may reduce the incidence of early structural failure and perhaps reduce the volume of wear debris generated in the long term. The purpose of this study was to investigate the tribological characteristics of a series of retrieved Accord meniscal knees, and in particular focus on the condition of the UHMWPE and the femoro-meniscal wear surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 768 Accord knees (Figure 7) have been implanted at Arrowepark Hospital since a clinical Tribological study of retrieved knee expiaats:J .L. Hailq et al. Figure 1 Photograph of the Accord meniscal bearing knee Figure 2 Photograph of an explant which suffered from metal-to- metal contact during articulation trial of the knee began in 1982, of which 73 have now been revised. The majority of these were revised for failure of cementless fixation and infection. None of the explants were revised for structural failure of the UHMWPE meniscus. Twenty-seven paired meniscal and femoral components were available for examina- tion in this study. An initial visual examination and the clinical history of the explants were used to determine the modes of failure of the components. Certain mechanical modes of failure were then eliminated from the tribological study. These included joints where the meniscus had dislocated and led to the two metal components, the femoral component and the tibia1 tray, contacting. During articulation these two metal components maintained contact leading to the generation of large amounts of metal wear debris. An example of this type of failure is shown in Figure 2. Sixteen of the 27 paired explants had failed in this manner and were thus discarded from the rest of the study, which has focused on the articulating surfaces. The full clinical history, patient details and regular follow-up information of the eleven remaining explants (which were evaluated for wear) were available from hospital records, and are summarized in Table 1. The average age of the patients was 60.0 years and their average weight was 71.1 kg. The period of implantation for these components ranged from less than 1 year to over 5 ears with an average lifetime of 33.4 months. In a dy dition to the revised explants, four unworn prostheses taken from clinical stock prior to implantation were also evaluated as control samples. The articulating surfaces of the menisci and femoral components were characterized by R, surface roughness measurements using a Talysurf 5 machine (Rank Taylor Hobson, Leicester). The R, was measured perpendicular to the direction of sliding using a 0.8 mm cut off. Three readings were obtained from each condyle, giving a total of six measurements per component. The mean of these readings was then calculated and used as the average R, value for that particular component. The UHMWPE meniscal components were wider than the femoral components, and due to a close fitting central locating step (see Figure 4b), the edges of the menisci were not subjected to wear. This resulted in the formation of a lip at the edges of Table 1 Summary of clinical data, patient details and follow-up information Case Wear life number (months) Activity capability Age (years) Weight (kgs) Sex Operation side Initial diagnosis Reason for revision I 8 A 73 72 F I. OA I,, ST 2 9 - 62 66 F R RA I 3 IO A 60 71 F L OA I 4 I6 A 61 64 M L OA I, 5 23 P 61 54 F R RA I 6 26 G 67 79 M I* Other I, L 7 43 G 46 73 F R RA L, ST 8 45 G 63 61 F R RA I, U 9 59 A 62 88 M L OA I,, ST IO 64 G 62 77 M R OA L II 64 A 43 77 F L OA L G, good mobility; A, average mobility; P, poor mobility; OA, osteo arthritis; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; I, infection; L, loosening; ST, subsidence of tibia; U, unstable 224 Med. Eng. Phys. 1994, Vol. 16, May the menisci. A Talycontor machine (Rank Taylor Hobson, Leicester) was used to trace across the surface of the menisci (perpendicular to the sliding direction) from one lip, over the worn region to the worn area and unworn lip on the op osite side of the component. A rotating levelling ta 1 le was used to ensure that the two unworn lips were at the same height, and that the menisci were orientated at exactly 90 to the direction of sliding. This proce- dure was repeated twice for each sample and the average difference between the height of the unworn lip and the height of the worn region was evaluated to give the penetration depth for each polyethylene component. It should be pointed out that the measured penetration into the menisci occurred as a result of both creep and wear of the polyethylene. Therefore the derivation of wear rates from penetra- tion rates should be treated with caution, particularly when penetration depths are small. RESULTS The surface roughnesses of the femoral components are shown in the graph in Figure 3. The number of months that the joint was im lamed for is shown on the x-axis, and the R, (in pm P It was found that general1 is shown on the y-axis. were in very good cr the femoral components con ition and had R, values similar to the unworn control. The average R, value for the worn femoral components was 0.055~m with a standard deviation of 0.075p.m (average R= of 0.032pm if the one anomaly, 59 months, was not included). This corn P ares with an Ra of 0.02p.m for the unworn contra component. There was one sample (59 months) which had a surface roughness an order of magnitude higher than the rest of the samples. This component had been badly scored g robably as a result of the entrapment of cement and one debris. One other component (64 months) showed a slightly higher R, and a slight deterioration of the surface. Figure 4a shows the surface roughnesses of the meniscal components. The implant lifetime is shown on the x-axis, and the R, is shown on the y-axis. From this graph it can be seen that there was an initial Lifetime (months) Figure 3 Histogram of the femoral surface roughness (R,) and implant life Tribologicnl study of retrieved knee explants:J L. Hailq, et al. a Lifetime (months) b Figure 4 a, Histogram of the meniscal surface roughness (%) and implant life. 4b, Photograph of a worn (right) and an unworn (left) meniscus smoothing of the surfaces followed by some deteriora- tion in certain cases. The average R, for the worn menisci was 1.15 pm with a standard deviation of 1.03pm (using the eight polished components the average Ra was 0.60pm, using the three bad1 damaged components the average R, was 2.63pm . r This compares with an avera e (standard deviation 0.23 pm Y value of 1.04 pm for the unworn samples. The Ra values for the worn components ranged from 0.28 pm up to 3.27pm, whereas those for the unworn controls ranged from 0.76pm up to 1.33pm. Initially the polymer surface was quite rough due to the machining marks. Initial wear and creep produced a smoothing or polishing of the UHMWPE meniscal components. The polishing of the worn menisci, compared to an unworn control, can be clearly seen in the 4b, where the sample on tK hotograph shown in Figure e right is the worn sample. Subsequently in certain cases the polymer surface became damaged and the surface roughness increased. Figure 5 shows the articulating surface of Case 10 (the first of the two samples implanted for 64 months on the graph in Figure 4a). This sample showed severe surface dama explants, an B e compared with that seen in the other failure of the surface can be seen in Figure 5. This was the worst case of the 27 explants which were studied. The Talycontor profile showed Med. Eng. Phys. 1994, Vol. 16, May 225 Tribological study of retrieved knee expluntxJ .1. Hailq et al. Figure 5 Photograph of the meniscus from Case 10 showing surface micro-delamination that this surface damage and wear occurred within 0.3 mm of the meniscal bearing surface. Similar wear features have been seen on acetabular cups from simulator studies which we have performed at Leeds University *. However, there was also evidence of gross misalignment and dislocation of the poly- ethylene meniscal component, and this surface damage could have been caused by contact with the edge of the femoral component when grossly mis- aligned. Local surface damage at the edge of the wear scar was noted on several of the older meniscal components and this is shown in Figure 6. This is believed to have occurred when the femoral com- ponent and the meniscus became slightly misaligned. The very small radii on the femoral components led to the development of high contact stresses at the edge contact with the meniscus. This in turn resulted in local structural failures, in the form of local severe damage to the surface of the polyethylene. The penetration de ths into the menisci are shown in Figure 7. The imp ant life is shown on the x-axis P and the penetration (in pm) is shown on the y-axis. There was a considerable variation in the penetration depths of the explants, and no correlation could be found with either wear life, patient weight, or patient activity. It can also be seen from Figure 7 that four of the menisci showed no detectable penetration, even after implantation for over 5 years in one case (64 months on the graph in Figure 7). Two of the samples were too badly deformed to obtain penetration Figure 6 Photograph showing local structural failure of a meniscus due to misalignment of the femoral component i 23 26 45 59 64 Lifetime (months) Figure 7 Histogram of the meniscal penetration depth and implant life depths from. This was due to severe misalignment of the meniscal component and gross damage of the polyethylene, and hence these samples were dis- regarded from this part of the study. The average penetration rate from the data shown in Figure 7 was found to be 40pmyear-. In this study the P enetra- tion depths and the Ra values for the latera side of both components were found to be similar to those obtained for the medial side. DISCUSSION Recent reports13 of structural fatigue and early failure in highly stressed nonconforming total condylar knees have caused considerable concern in the surgical community. This has prompted a renewed interest in the meniscal bearing knee where it is possible to increase contact area and reduce contact stresses to levels more generally found in hip prostheses. It is important to recognize that changes in the design and tribological conditions in artificial joints can cause marked changes in the wear and failure processes in the UHMWPE components. In all polyethylene acetabular cups in hip prostheses, where contact stresses are generally lower than in total condylar knees, structural failure is extremely rare, and wear particles are generated by surface wear processes produced by asperity interactions14. In Argenson and OConnors long term study of Oxford meniscal knees, surface wear and pentration rates were reported, but no evidence of structural failure was recorded, demonstrating the potential of the meniscal bearing concept. In this study the majority of the implants retrieved showed metal-to- metal contact due to dislocation of the meniscal components. As this would have produced consider- able metallic debris which could subsequently damage the articulating surfaces, these prostheses were excluded from the study. It was shown that, in general, the surface roughness of the femoral components did not change signifi- cantly with implantation time. Some fine scratches running parallel to the direction of sliding were visible on the surfaces of the femoral components, although these did not appear to have a significant 226 Med. Eng. Phys. 1994, Vol. 16, May Triboh@al study of retrieved knee explunts:J L. Ha&y et al. reduced stresses have been demonstrated in this study. However, it is necessary to em hasise biomechanical difficulties of ensuring sta ! the meniscal knee design. ility in the influence on the R, values. Since the scratches were orientated in the direction of sliding, it is unlikely that they would have had a significant effect on the wear of the polyethylene, compared to scratches which were perpendicular to the sliding direction. In hip joints this type of scratching has been related to increased polyethylene wear as in the hip the scratches tend to be more randomly orientated due to the more complex movements generated. The pattern of wear and changes in the surface to ograph of the meniscal component were gener- al y ip ly similar to those found in acetabular P cr where surface wear processes remove EYsethylene particles within 10pm of the surface, an dr severe plastic deformation of the polyethylene has been noted up to a depth of 40pm below the surface. The initial roughness of the pol marks was smoothed by creep an Jrn er machine counterface as microscopic t! erity wear (Figure 4). Subsequent1 in certain cases e polymer surface deteriorated. Jh is may be due to abrasive action by third body bone cement particles, or alternatively the onset of macro- scopic 1 olymer wear processes which have been reporte in explanted acetabular cups15. One meniscal component (Case 10) showed severe surface damage, and the depth of this severe surface damage was up to 300pm from the articulating surface. Although similar surface wear patterns have been seen in hip joint simulator studies in the laboratory, there was also evidence of gross misalignment of this component and this severe surface damage ma have been caused by edge contact of the femora ly com- ponent. In the explants which did not dislocate, or show evidence of gross misalignment, gross structural failure (characterized by delamination originating from a depth of greater than 0.5mm into the UHMWPE) was not found. However, the follow u of 5 years is quite short and direct comparison wi t! longer term follow up studies of total condylar knees should be approached with caution. When misalign- ment of the Accord knee occurred, local stress concentrations were formed at the edge of the femoral component, and local structural failure resulted due to the abnormally high contact stresses. The average penetration rate was also evaluated from our data and compared with that obtained by other workers. We calculated a penetration rate of 0.040 mm year- (4Opm) for the Accord knee, which compares well with the figure of 0.047 mm year- obtained by Argenson and OConnor for the Oxford meniscal knee. In comparison Dowson et a1.16 obtained significantly higher penetration rates for conventional Geomedic and Freeman-Swanson knees - 0.22 and 0.26mmyear respectively. The penetration rate in the meniscal knee was comparable with that found with hip joints as shown by Dowling17 who obtained a penetration rate of 0.06 mm year- for post mortem acetabular cups. However, care must be taken when comparing penetration rates in different types of knees and hips, as the different geometries involved will produce different volume than es for the same penetration rate. Also these volume c a anges can include different contributions from creep and wear. Des mental tri K ite this, the authors feel that the funda- ological advantages of a meniscal knee design, which include larger contact areas and CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, the tribological advantages of the Accord meniscal bearing knee joint are as follows. There was generally little damage of the articulating surfaces. The wear and penetration rates were very low. There was no evidence of any structural failures, except in cases where the femoral corn onent and the meniscus were misaligned, and lot ap damage was formed at the edge of the contact area. The pattern of surface wear in this knee was similar to that seen in hips with comparable penetration rates for the two types of joint. In the 27 retrieved knees reported in this study failure of the cementless fixation was the most frequent cause of revision. This led to instability of the joint and edge contacts between the femoral com- ponent and the meniscus, which due to the small radii on the femoral component led to the generation of high contact stresses and local structural failure. There were a number of cases where dislocation of the meniscus which led to metal-on-metal contact during articuation, and the potential for generation of large quantities of metal wear debris. AC!KNOWLEDGFBIENTS This work was funded by the Arthritis and Rheumat- ism Council (ARC). REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Walker PS. Bearing surface design in total knee replace- ment. Eng Med 1988; 17: 149-56. Bartel DL, Bicknell VL, Wright TM. The effect of conformity, thickness and material on stress in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. JBoneJoint Surg 1986; 68-A: 1041-51. Wright TM, Rimnac CM, Stulberg SD, Mints L, Tsao AK, Klein RW, McCrae C. Wear of polyethylene in total joint replacements. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1992; 276: 126-34. Kilgus DJ, Moreland JR, Finerman GAM, Funahashi IT, Tipton JS. Catastrophic wear of tibial polyethylene inserts. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1992; 273: 223-31. Mayor MB, Wrona M, Collier JP, Jensen RE. The role of polyethylene quality in the failure of tibial knee com- ponents. Transactions of 39th Annual Meeting of Orthopaedic Research Society, Feb. 15-18, San Francisco, 1993; 292. Landy MM, Walker PS. Wear of UHMWPE in 90 retrieved knee prostheses. J Arthrq&ty, 1988; Oct. Suppl. 73. Blunn GW, Joshi AB, Lilley PA, Engelbrecht E, Ryd L, Lidgren L, Hardinge K, Nieder E, Walker PS. Poly- ethylene wear in unicondylar knee prostheses: 106 retrieved Marmor, PCA, and St Georg tibia1 components compared. Acta Orthop &and, 1992; 63: 247. 8. Collier JP, Mayor MB, McNamara JL, Surprenant VA, Jensen RE. Analysis of the failure of 122 polyethylene inserts from uncemented tibia1 knee components. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1991; 273: 232-42. 9. Engh GA, Dwyer KA, Hanes CK. Polyethylene wear of Med. Eng. Phys. 1994, Vol. 16, May 227 Tribological study of retrieved knee expkmts:J.L. Ha&y et al, metal-backed tibia1 components in total and unicompart- mental knee prostheses. JBone Joint Surg 1992; 74-B: 9- 17. 10. Argenson J-N, OConnor JJ. Polyethylene wear in meniscal knee replacement. J BoneJoint Surg 1992; 74-B: 228-32. 11. Johnson R, Walker CR, Harvey IA, Barry GK, Elloy MA. Five to eight year results of the Johnson-Elloy (Accord) total knee arthroplasty. JArthroplasty, 1993; 8: 27-32. 12. Dowson D, Jobbins B. Design and development of a versatile hip joint simulator and a preliminary assessment of wear and creep in Charnley total replacement hip joints. Eng Med 1988; 17: 111-17. 13. Goodfellow J. Editorial, Knee prostheses - one step forward, two steps back. JBoneJoint Surg 1992; 74-B: l-2. 14. Cooper JR, Dowson D, Fisher J. Macroscopic and microscopic wear mechanisms in ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Wear 1993; 162-164: 378-84. 15. Cooper JR, Dowson D, Fisher J. Birefringent studies of polyethylene wear specimens and acetabular cups. Wear 1991; 151: 391-402. 16. Dowson D, McCullagh PJ, Wright V. An assesssment of the relative importance of wear and creep in the overall performance of load-bearing total replacement knee joints. In: Willert H-G, Buchhom GH, Eyerer P, eds. Ultra-H&h Mokcular Weight Polyethylene as Biomaterial in Orthopaedic Surgeery. Toronto: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers 1991; 32-40. 17. Dowling JM. Wear analysis of retrieved prostheses. In: Szycher M, ed. Biocompatible Polymers, Metals, and Com- posites. Pennsylvania: Technomic 1983; 407-425. 1994 IEEE ULTRASONICSSYMPOSIUM NOVEMBER~ST-~TH, 1994 CANNES, FRANCE Sponsored by the IEEE Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics & Frequency Control Society There will be a large range of topics for discussion, including: Bio-effects and Biophysics Hyperthermia Medical imaging Physical acoustics Quantitative laser ultrasonics Tissue characterization Tissue motion and compliance Ultrasonic in surgery Abstract submission deadline: Friday April 29th, 1994 Abstracts to be sent to: Ultrasonics Symposium, c/o LRW Associates, 1218 Balfour Drive, Arnold, MD 21012-2150, USA. Tel: +410 647 1591 or Fax: +410 647 5136. For further information please contact: Bernhard R. Titmann, The Pennsylvania State University, 227 Hammond Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA. Tel: +814 865 7827 or Fax: +814 863 7967. 228 Med. Eng. Phys. 1994, Vol. 16, May