Running head: SUNSET GRILL 1

Sunset Grill
Name:
Institution:










2
SUNSET GRILL
Sunset Grill
Executive Summary
This paper recognizes the reasons why Sunset Grill is not working at its maximum
capacity, thus minimizing its revenues. This paper evaluates what makes Sunset Grill at Blue an
alluring establishment while likewise illustrating means in which it can augment its operational
potential. The paper will demonstrate how the restaurant is missing the mark regarding its
revenue potential for reasons identifying with exorbitant throughput time, deficient configuration
characteristics, and additionally a wasteful usage of facility design and an ungraceful worker
base. This paper not just recognizes these major issues which prompt income misfortunes;
however it additionally uncovers indications of the issue, for example, bottlenecks, service go-
slow, and long delaying times. These concerns are considerably more aggravated when
considering the exceptional locale in which the restaurant runs, demographic organization of its
customer base, and its clashing managerial business procedure of looking for a dependable client
base who want fresh local sustenance while in the meantime running it like a quick nourishment
restaurant, which frustrates the feasting encounter that loyal clients may look for. At last, this
paper will give answers for these issues that won't just give managerial center, yet will likewise
give a schema to process change.
Background
Sunset Grill at Blue Mountain situated at Blue Mountain in Toronto is an all-day "fresh to
request" breakfast restaurant possessed by Bruce Melhuish and his associate. Dissimilar to most
eateries in the area, Sunset Grill at Blue runs only a solitary shift daily with the hours of
operation from 7am to 4pm lasting through the year. The franchise viewpoint is to keep up a
benevolent environment, with a serving made to request fresh and nourishing sustenance
3
SUNSET GRILL
(Butterworth-Heinemann, 2005). It is one of two Sunset Grill establishments situated in
Toronto's traveller terminuses. This scene has impacted both on the achievement and a few
difficulties to the establishment owners. Case in point, because of being positioned in a tourist
territory, numerous customizations with the design, floor furnishing, and stock administration
added to the first financing expenses. Nonetheless, in the first year of operations, Sunset Grill
earned back the original investment monetarily. In spite of the fact that Bruce has made this
accomplishment in the first year, the business presently confronts some operational issues which
frustrate the potential for Sunset-at-Blue to produce more transactions.
Bruce has perceived a few issues with the restaurant operation which make restraints to
their deals production potential. Several problems Bruce noticed are as ensues:
Lines on weekends could take up to 25 minutes of hold up time.
Normally 40 to 50 chits/requests delaying in the kitchen to be cooked. Bruce
approximates the cooks use approximately 5 minutes for every breakfast order.
The normal turn time is 32 minutes. This is the time customers get their nourishment
request to the time they take off. As of now the restaurant has 24 tables inside, 13 outside
which are just being used in June through August. Everyday deals cycle is subject to the
visitor eating time and the recurrence of turning tables.
Likewise on weekends, it takes more time to get nourishment to the tables on the grounds
that servers are not efficient in serving customers.
Preparation time for burger, steak, or chicken is twelve minutes for every request
contrasted with the 5 minutes for the breakfast things so this stretches the deals process
duration or time to get clients taken care of.
4
SUNSET GRILL
There is lower limit of customers amid the winter months since the terrace is shut. The
yard is inoperable amid winter months. This decrease in capability brings down the deals
production potential for shareholders.
Problem Statement
Sunset-at-Blue broke even in the initial year of operation. Nonetheless the shareholders
have confronted issues with diminishing operational lines to turn tables faster and reduce the
holding up time for customers which at last prompts creating more income.
Analysis
Sunset-at-Blue has operational disasters on administration of capability and demand
which ought to be considered to attain achievement. It was a restaurant which intended to offer
pocket friendly foods that charmed the whole family amid their holidays. The franchisor of this
restaurant dependably was centered on how he could spare holding up time to the customer when
they come to consume in the restaurant rather than client's gratification (Panneerselvam, 2006).
Due to these reasons, the owners assessed vital arguments concerning the services he has on the
restaurant. In the first place, he had a strict policy of no-substitutions plates actually when they
brought the wrong plate and he realized that was bringing grumbles from the clients. Likewise,
the franchisor felt that perhaps he could lessen things from the menu. Furthermore, he
acknowledged that they have more customers amid the weekend and therefore he chose to
contract one runner staffs who simply convey the nourishment from the kitchen to the tables,
permitting serves to serve clients more proficiently.
No waiting space
The restaurant was not equipped to making an exceptional space for customers to sit at
the restaurant on the off chance that they have to await. Equally as mentioned in the case, the
5
SUNSET GRILL
customer needed to hold up to around 40 to 50 minutes to get the table and request their
nourishment. The absence of this holding up space was distressing to customers. They could be
losing some customers because of inability to discover an alternate spot for waiting as orders are
being served. Additionally, no one needs to wait for 50 minutes for a table on an uncomfortable
spot.
How to improve customer waiting time
The owner understood the issue and accordingly he chose to enhance the circumstances
to let clients get nourishment rapidly and decrease hold up time. The restaurant's forte
incorporated two valuable variables: fresh, delicious sustenance and low cost. All the food in the
menu were cooked freshly and examined to verify they were nourishing as could be expected
under the circumstances. Meanwhile, the costs of breakfast were kept up low, which were most
alluring to costumers (Johnston, 2003). The shortcomings of the restaurant were clear to
perceive, particularly its inadequate servers and the long time for normal turn. Clerks, host, and
were all under eighteen part-time without coaching. Furthermore, because of the constrained
limit and the confounding request in the kitchen, the time for client holding up in the line was
long, almost thirty minutes (Slack & Chambers, 2009). The incompetent client service and
sustenance supplying may prompt the loss of clients. Separated from those, there were prospects
for the restaurant. The ventures from intra-west duty are persistent to foster real estate in this
town. Sunset-at-Blue profited from this example, they shared the exercises so that its sales were
very identified with the developing Town inhabitance rates. Furthermore in the locality of this
restaurant, breakfast choices were rare for the clients; prices for contenders' were higher than the
restaurant.

6
SUNSET GRILL
Conclusion
Sunset-at-Blue need to enhance its efficiency in serving customers so that the waiting up time is
lessened. Additionally they should set up a waiting area as a customers order is processed.




















7
SUNSET GRILL

Reference
Butterworth-Heinemann, E. (2005).Strategic Operations Management. New York: Prentice Hall.
Johnston. B. (2003). Cases in Operations Management. London: Prentice Hall.
Panneerselvam, R. (2006). Production and Operations Management. New Delhi: Prentice hall.
Slack, N., & Chambers, S. (2009). Operations Management. New York: Prentice Hall.