Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
K
L
M
m
C
M
m
(1)
where C denotes an aqueous concentration, M is the amount
adsorbed, K
L
is the Langmuir constant, which represents the
afnity of the adsorption process, and M
m
is the maximum
amount adsorbed as C increases. Aplot of C/Mversus C should
give a straight line of slope 1/M
m
and an intercept of 1/K
L
M
m
on the C/M axis.
For comparison, we also t the EGCG adsorption isotherm
with the Freundlich model, an empirical exponential equa-
tion, which can be described as
12
M K
f
C
1=n
(2)
where M is the amount adsorbed, 1/n is a constant, K
f
is an
afnity constant, and C is the concentration of the EGCG
solution. Its logarithmic form is
log M log K
f
log C=n (3)
i.e. a plot of log M versus log C should give a straight line of
slope 1/n and an intercept of log K
f
on the log M axis.
2.6. Fluorescence quenching measurements
Fluorescence quenching is described by the SternVolmer
equation
13
:
F
0
F
1 k
q
t
0
1 K
SV
Q (4)
In this equation F
0
and F are the uorescence intensities in
the absence and presence of a quencher, respectively, k
q
is the
bimolecular quenching constant, t
0
is the lifetime of the
uorophore in the absence of quencher, and [Q] is the
concentration of the quencher. If the quenching is known
to be dynamic or static, the SternVolmer constant (K
SV
) will be
represented by dynamic quenching constant (K
D
) or static
quenching constant (K
S
). Otherwise this constant will be
described as K
SV
. Quenching can also occur as a result of the
formationof a non-uorescent ground-state complexbetween
the uorophore and the quencher, and in such cases, k
q
is
calculated. For biomacromolecules, the lifetime of the
uorophore is approximately 10
8
s, and the maximum value
possible for diffusion-limited quenching in water is
10
10
M
1
s
1
.
13
Quenching data are usually presented as
plots of F
0
/F versus [Q]. This is because F
0
/F is expected to be
linearly dependent upon the concentration of the quencher. A
plot of F
0
/F versus [Q] yields an intercept of one on the y-axis
and a slope equal to K
SV
. A linear SternVolmer plot is
generally indicative of a single class of uorophore in proteins,
all equally accessible to the quencher. This means that only
one mechanism (dynamic or static) of quenching occurs.
When the value of the bimolecular quenching constant is
much higher than that of the diffusion-limited quenching
constant, and the SternVolmer plot presents as linear, it
could mean that there is complex formation between protein
and quencher, corresponding to a static mechanism.
The uorescence intensities were recorded with a
PerkinElmer LS5 luminescence phosphorescence spectro-
photometer, using 2.5 nm excitation; 5 nm emission slit
widths; the lamp voltage, 700 V; scan velocity, 1200 nm s
1
.
A 1-cm quartz cell was used. To determine the linear
concentration range for WS and PS uorescence, a series of
saliva solutions with increasing concentrations (01 mg/ml)
were prepared in ion exchanged water at pH = 7.0 and
25 0.01 8C. The maximum excitation wavelength (l
ex
) and
maximum emission wavelength (l
em
) for saliva were 285 nm
and 348 nm, respectively. The linear range of saliva
uorescence was between 0.01 mg/ml and 0.10 mg/ml (data
were not shown). Therefore, a 0.5 mg/ml salivary protein
was chosen as the concentration for uorescence quenching
in this experiment.
Saliva (90 ml) was mixed with different amounts (10 ml,
20 ml, 30 ml, 40 ml, 50 ml, and 60 ml) of the 3 mM EGCG solution,
in a total of 3 ml, respectively. The change in uorescence
emission intensity was measured within 1 min of adding the
EGCGsolutionto saliva at 25 0.01 8C. Eachmeasurement was
repeated in triplicate and the mean and standard deviation
were calculated. For the calculation of the quenching
constants, the data were plotted as a SternVolmer plot of
a r c hi v e s o f o r a l b i o l og y 5 5 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 4 7 0 4 7 8 472
F/F
0
against [Q], and the quenching constant was calculated by
linear regression.
Atea polyphenol possesses intrinsic uorescence at the l
ex
(282 nm) and displays a corresponding l
em
at 318 nm
13
which
is near those of salivary proteins. To eliminate the background
effect on the uorescence quenching values of salivary
proteins, the uorescence emission intensities of EGCG were
measured at 318 nm as a blank titration series (i.e. adding
0.25 ml of each EGCG concentration into 3 ml of buffer). The
uorescence values obtained were then subtracted from the
uorescence intensity values obtained for saliva quenching.
2.7. Statistical analysis
The data were analyzed for statistical signicance using a two-
way ANOVA analysis followed by a SNK-q test for multiple
comparisons or a paired t-test for two sample comparisons
(a = 0.05).
3. Results
3.1. FTIR spectra for EGCG on WS and PS surfaces
The FTIR spectrum can be used to identify adsorption
processes onto the surface, and to prove the existence of
hydrogen bonding between the adsorbed EGCG molecules and
saliva surfaces. The FTIR spectra of WS and PS surfaces with
and without the EGCGadsorptionwere obtained(Figs. 2 and 3).
The FTIR spectra of WS and PS surfaces display two bands at
1660 cm
1
, 1623 cm
1
, and 1550 cm
1
; this is characteristic of
protein amide bands.
11
The 1660 cm
1
and 1623 cm
1
(amide I)
bands were attributed to protein amide C O stretching
vibrations and NH
3
+
bending vibrations, and the 1550 cm
1
(amide II) band was due to the amide NH bending vibrations
and CN stretching vibrations.
11
The peak of the infrared
absorption of amide bands I and II for the EGCG adsorbed on
WS and PS surface had no other remarkable shifts at
1660 cm
1
, 1623 cm
1
, and 1550 cm
1
. New peaks at
1727 cm
1
, 1525 cm
1
, 1319 cm
1
, and 1038 cm
1
in the FTIR
spectra of EGCG adsorbed on WS surfaces and at 1727 cm
1
,
1391 cm
1
, 1230 cm
1
, and 1014 cm
1
in the FTIR spectra of
EGCG adsorbed on PS surfaces were observed, which illumi-
nate the characteristic bands of EGCG.
3.2. Mass, thickness and viscoelasticity of EGCG adlayer
Figs. 4 and 5 show the recorded the time-resolved frequency
change (DF) and energy dissipation change (DD) at different
concentrations of EGCG solution (from2 mMto 24 mM) for the
fth overtone during EGCG adsorption to WS (Fig. 4) and PS
(Fig. 5) surfaces for 70 min. There was an obvious decrease in
Fig. 2 Infrared spectra of the WS-modified quartz crystal
surface before (black line) and after (gray line) EGCG
adsorption.
Fig. 3 Infrared spectra of the PS-modified quartz crystal
surface before (black line) and after (gray line) EGCG
adsorption.
Fig. 4 Shifts of time-dependent frequency and energy
dissipation for EGCG adsorption on the WS-modified
quartz crystal surface at various EGCG concentrations: (a)
2 mM; (b) 4 mM; (c) 8 mM; (d) 12 mM; (e) 16 mM; and (f)
24 mM, at pH = 7.0 and 25 W0.01 8C.
a r c hi v e s o f or a l b i ol o gy 5 5 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 4 7 0 4 7 8 473
DF and marked increase in DD right after the injection of EGCG
solution. This was followed by a more gradual change in DF
and DD until the steady state was reached. In order to describe
EGCG adsorption behaviours accurately, the values of mass,
thickness, elasticity, and viscosity of the EGCG adlayer on the
saliva surfaces at various concentrations of EGCG solution
were calculated by the Sauerbrey equation and by the Voigt
model (Fig. 6). The mass, thickness, elasticity, and viscosity
of the EGCG adlayer on WS surfaces increased with the
increase in EGCG concentration. The mass and thickness of
the EGCG adlayer on PS surfaces increased with the increase
in EGCG concentration, but the elasticity and viscosity of the
EGCG adlayer on PS surfaces decreased along with the
increase in EGCG concentration. At various concentrations
of EGCG solution, the values of mass and thickness for the
EGCG adlayer on WS surfaces were signicantly higher than
those for the EGCG adlayer on PS surfaces (P < 0.05). The
values of elasticity and viscosity of the EGCG adlayer on WS
surfaces were distinctly lower thanthose of the EGCGadlayer
onto PS surfaces at 2 mM and 4 mM concentrations of EGCG
solution (P < 0.05), and signicantly higher at 16 mM and
24 mM concentrations (P < 0.05), but similar at 8 mM and
12 mM concentrations (P > 0.05).
3.3. Adsorption models and constants
The data of EGCGadsorption on WS and PS surfaces were t to
the Langmuir model and to the Freundlich model with the
Fig. 5 Shifts of time-dependent frequency and energy
dissipation for EGCG adsorption on the PS-modified quartz
crystal surface at various EGCG concentrations: (a) 2 mM;
(b) 4 mM; (c) 8 mM; (d) 12 mM; (e) 16 mM; and (f) 24 mM, at
pH = 7.0 and 25 W0.01 8C.
Fig. 6 Changes of mass (A), thickness (B), elasticity (C), and viscosity (D) of the EGCG adlayer on WS and PS surfaces at
various EGCG concentrations. *P < 0.05 versus the other groups (ANOVA).
a r c hi v e s o f o r a l b i o l og y 5 5 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 4 7 0 4 7 8 474
correlationcoefcient of determination, as shownin Fig. 7 and
Table 1. Though both models can be used to describe the
adsorption behaviour, the values of R
2
for EGCG adlayer onto
WS and PS surfaces from the Freundlich model were all
signicantly higher than those from the Langmuir model
(P < 0.05), which suggests that using the Freundlich model to
t the experimental data is much more satisfactory compared
with the Langmuir model. The calculated adsorption con-
stants from the Langmuir and the Freundlich model are listed
in Table 2. All of the values of the EGCG adsorption constants
between WS and PS surfaces display signicant differences
(P < 0.05), which indicate that the afnity of EGCG to WS is
obviously higher than that of EGCG to PS.
3.4. Temperature-dependent measurement by QCM-D
EGCG adsorption on WS and PS surfaces were performed by
temperature-dependent QCM-D measurements for 12 mM
EGCG at 25 8C, 30 8C, and 35 8C, as shown in Fig. 8. By
increasing the temperature, the mass of the EGCG adsorption
on WS or PS surfaces increased, namely, a higher mass of the
EGCG adlayer was observed at higher temperatures (P < 0.05).
3.5. Experiment of uorescence quenching
The binding afnities for EGCG to WS and to PS were also
evaluated by the measurement of the intrinsic uorescence
intensity of salivary proteins before and after the addition of
different concentrations of EGCG (Fig. 9). In all cases, a
decrease in the uorescence intensity caused by quenching
was observed, however, there was no shift of the maximum
l
em
. EGCG was found to eventually lead to about 55%
quenching of WS and PS uorescence emission intensity.
Fig. 10 shows the SternVolmer plots of EGCG quenching WS
and PS intrinsic uorescence. K
SV
was determined by a linear
regression of a plot of F
0
/F against [Q]. Hence, k
q
can be
Fig. 7 Adsorption isotherm of EGCG onto WS (shown in
* and solid line) and PS (shown in * and dashed line)
surfaces fitted to the Langmuir model (A) and the
Freundlich model (B).
Table 1 The correlation coefficient of determination (R
2
)
for the Langmuir model and the Freundlich model.
Saliva Langmuir model Freundlich model
WS 0.966 0.001
a
0.994 0.003
c
PS 0.902 0.013
b
0.958 0.015
d
Within the same column, the values (MV SD) with different
superscript letters are signicantly different (ANOVA, P < 0.05).
Table 2 The adsorption isotherm constants of the
Langmuir model and the Freundlich model.
Saliva M
m
(ng/cm
2
) K
L
(mM
1
) K
f
(ng/cm
2
mM)
WS 484 14
a
260 18
a
151 8
a
PS 366 16
b
131 31
b
79 19
b
Within the same column, the values (MV SD) with different
superscript letters are signicantly different (paired t-test,
P < 0.05).
Fig. 8 Mass changes for 12 mM EGCG adsorption on WS
and PS surfaces at various temperatures. *P < 0.05 versus
the other groups (ANOVA).
a r c hi v e s o f or a l b i ol o gy 5 5 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 4 7 0 4 7 8 475
calculated by the ratio between K
SV
and t
0
from Eq. (4). Table 3
summarizes the calculatedK
SV
andk
q
. The values of K
SV
and k
q
for EGCG binding to WS are signicantly higher than those to
PS (P < 0.05).
4. Discussion
4.1. Property of EGCG adlayer
The better t of the EGCG adsorption isotherm using the
Freundlich model rather than the Langmuir model conrmed
that the distribution of EGCG binding on saliva surfaces was
due to the heterogeneity and continuous binding sites, which
are two characteristics of the Freundlich model.
11
The
heterogeneous distribution of the EGCG adlayer is due to
the aggregation of saliva through EGCG bridges because some
characteristic bands of FTIR spectra for EGCG were observed.
The increases of the mass, thickness, and viscoelasticity of the
EGCG adlayer on WS surfaces were observed when the
concentration of the EGCG solution was increased from
2 mM to 24 mM, which suggests that the EGCG adlayer
eventually became more rigid. At low EGCG concentrations,
a small fraction of water may be entrapped internally in the
EGCG adlayer, and result in a more soft and incompact EGCG
adlayer on WS surfaces. At high EGCG concentrations, some
adsorbed EGCG molecules may act as bridges to allow salivary
molecules to aggregate with each other. At the same time,
water, coupled with salivary molecules, would be gradually
driven out during the EGCG adsorption. Consequently, the
greater mass and thickness of EGCG adsorbed on WS surface
will cause anincrease inboththe elasticity and viscosity of the
EGCG adlayer. Therefore, the EGCG adlayer will become more
compact and stiff. The same phenomena were taking place in
the adsorption of the EGCG adlayer on BSA surface.
11,14
Even if
the mass and thickness of the adsorbed EGCG adlayer on PS
surfaces at low EGCG concentrations were lower compared
with those at high EGCG concentrations, the elasticity and
viscosity of the EGCG adlayer at low concentrations were
higher than those at high concentrations. The tendency of the
viscoelasticity of the EGCG adlayer on PS surfaces was just the
opposite to that on WS surfaces, whichsuggests that the EGCG
adlayer on PS surfaces at low EGCG concentrations was
adsorbed more completely, and was relatively more rigid due
to the strong interactions between EGCG and PS. Considering
that the total concentrations of salivary proline-rich proteins
(PRPs) and histatins are nearly three times as much compared
to that of a-amylase (0.66 mg/ml) in PS,
4
it is reasonable to
think that PRPs and histatins may be the main proteins
participating in the strong interaction between EGCG and PS,
forming a stiffer and more compact adlayer at low EGCG
concentrations. The increasing trend of mass and thickness
for the EGCG adlayer on WS surfaces is similar to that on PS
surfaces, but the amount of adlayer on WS surfaces is
signicantly higher than those on PS surfaces at various
Fig. 9 Fluorescence emission spectra of WS and PS in the
absence and the presence of different concentrations of
EGCG: (a) 0 mM; (b) 2 mM; (c) 4 mM; (d) 8 mM; (e) 12 mM;
(f) 16 mM; and (g) 24 mM.
Fig. 10 SternVolmer plots of fluorescence quenching of
WS (shown in * and solid line) and PS (shown in *
and dashed line) at different concentrations of EGCG.
Table 3 SternVolmer (K
SV
) and bimolecular quenching
(k
q
) constants for interaction of EGCG with WS and PS.
Saliva k
q
(10
12
M
1
s
1
) K
SV
(10
4
M
1
)
WS 2.006 0.022
a
2.006 0.222
a
PS 1.907 0.008
b
1.907 0.008
b
Within the same column, the values (MV SD) with different
superscript letters are signicantly different (paired t-test,
P < 0.05).
a r c hi v e s o f o r a l b i o l og y 5 5 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 4 7 0 4 7 8 476
concentrations of EGCGsolution. The mainreasonis related to
the gel-like network structure from the mucins in WS. In
general, the association of EGCG with saliva will reduce the
salivary lubrication. The astringency is perceived as the
friction between two non-lubricated surfaces. The increased
friction induces a tactile sensation by activating mechanor-
eceptors in the mouth, thus leading to the perception of
astringency.
1517
Withmore EGCGdeposited onsaliva surfaces
by the continuous binding sites and aggregation capacity of
saliva through EGCG bridges, the viscoelasticity and coverage
of the EGCG adlayer on the oral mucosal surface became
larger. Thus the astringency and loss of lubrication of the oral
mucosa would be likely to aggravate the mucosa. Therefore,
we can make a reasonable conclusion that the viscoelasticity
of the EGCG adlayer ties up with an unpleasant sensation of
roughness and dryness, i.e. astringency in the oral cavity. This
discomfort, however, is a subjective sensation that is
complicated to quantify, and measurement of its gradual
elimination by an instrument remains an elusive target in the
future.
4.2. Afnity of EGCG to saliva
In our adsorption studies by QCM-D, the values of M
m
, K
L
and
K
f
for EGCG on WS surfaces are all signicantly higher than
those on PS surfaces, which suggests that the binding afnity
of EGCG to WS is higher than that to PS. A possible reason for
this discrepancy is that the oral mucosa is a broad binding site
and a less permeable barrier for all experimentally proven
polyphenols and is, therefore, an efcient tissue for the
absorption of topically consumed dietary polyphenols.
18
The
saliva lm-coated tooth, mucosa surface, and soluble saliva
are probably sites of biological action. Because WS contains
many more complex constituents, more binding sites will be
exposed to WS surfaces bringing on the signicantly different
binding afnities between EGCG to WS and to PS. This result
suggests that WS has a much stronger neutralization for the
harmful effects of EGCG than PS. The high afnity of EGCG to
saliva suggests that the precipitation of EGCG/saliva is not
easy to dissociate. This result also implies that the EGCG
adlayer has a good retention associated with saliva on the
mucosa.
In order to gain further support for the binding afnity of
soluble saliva with EGCG, quenching of the tryptophan
uorescence of salivary proteins by titration with an EGCE
solutionwas carriedout. Inproteins, the three aromatic amino
acids, i.e. phenylalanine (Phe), tyrosine (Tyr), and tryptophan
(Typ), are all uorescent. WS contains a complex mixture of
some 330 proteins and peptides, whichinclude numerous Phe,
Tyr, and Trp residues. For instance, a-amylase, PRPs and
histatins contain 18 Trp, 20 Tyr and 28 Phe; 622 Tyr, no Trp
and Phe; and2 Tyr, no Trp andPhe amino acid residues intheir
sequences, respectively (NCBI Protein Data Bank). To explain
the data from uorescence quenching in this experiment, it is
important to understand what kind of interaction occurs
between EGCG and salivary proteins by calculating the
bimolecular quenching constant. In these studies, the
SternVolmer plots for EGCGquenching of WS and PS proteins
are all linear (Fig. 10), and the values of k
q
for WS and PS are all
100-fold higher than the maximum value of diffusion-limited
quenching in water (10
10
M
1
s
1
). This means that only a
static quenching occurred,
19
and a ground-state complex
formed between EGCG and salivary protein. The values of K
SV
are equal to those of K
S
(Table 3) corresponding to a static
mechanism. The value of K
S
for the EGCG quenching of WS is
larger than PS, which reects that the afnity of EGCGto WS is
higher than that to PS. The results of the binding afnity of the
uorescence quenching are consistent with those of EGCG
adsorption by QCM-D, suggesting that both experiments, i.e.
uorescent quenching and QCM-D, are useful methods to
study the afnity between polyphenols and proteins. Consid-
ering the biological functions of soluble salivary proteins, the
binding of soluble saliva to EGCG will directly counteract with
saliva, providing local protection at the oor of the mouth
against mechanical forces during eating and speaking.
When considering the effect of EGCG quenching on the
uorescence spectra of WS and PS, no apparent l
em
shift was
observed, which suggested no other changes in the local
environment of the tryptophan residues. Except for the
evidence that EGCG was adjacent to the tryptophan residues
at the moment of excitation, the molecular conformation of
the protein was not affected no matter what the EGCG
mechanism of interaction was. If there had been a conforma-
tional change for WS and PS proteins, a shift in the peak of
amide band I or disappearance of the peak corresponding to
the NH residual amide band II would have been observed,
however, neither of themoccurred. The biological functions of
saliva have been shown to be dependent upon the intact
conformation of proteins. The high conformational stability of
the native state after salivary proteins were quenchedby EGCG
suggested that the molecular structure of salivary proteins
would be maintained, along with the native biological role and
activity. One experimental data showed that conformational
changes of WS proteins were observed by the exposure of their
tryptophan residues to catechin and epicatechin.
1
The
reasonable explanation is that EGCG has a higher molecular
weight compared with epicatechin and catechin, but phenolic
compounds with low molecular weights had been reported to
affect boththe secondary and tertiary structure of the proteins
as determined by circular dichroism and FTIR.
20
4.3. Driving force of EGCG binding to saliva
Although EGCG bridges may cause aggregation of salivary
proteins,
21,22
hydrogen bonding between the phenolic hydrox-
yl groups of EGCG and the amide groups of saliva as well as
hydrophobic interactions may also occur, and are responsible
for EGCG binding to saliva. Hydrogen bonding was conrmed
by our measurement of the FTIR spectra. The hydrophobic
interaction was veried by temperature-dependent QCM-D
measurements. At increased temperature, hydrophobic inter-
actions are known to be favored.
11
In our study, EGCG has the
characteristic of temperature-dependent precipitation, as a
higher mass of the EGCG adlayer was observed at higher
temperatures. Increasing the temperature may cause a partial
unfolding of molecules of salivary proteins, thus increasing
the exposure of the hydrophobic surfaces of the proteins to
which more EGCG molecules may take part in binding
reactions.
11,18
The entropically driven characteristic of EGCG
binding on saliva suggests that EGCG may preferentially bind
a r c hi v e s o f or a l b i ol o gy 5 5 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 4 7 0 4 7 8 477
to hydrophobic constituents of the oral mucosa rather than
soluble salivary proteins, and that binding to these compo-
nents may initiate the astringent response. Therefore, the
hydrogen bonding, the hydrophobic interactions, and the
entropy-drive may be the main driving force of EGCG binding
to saliva.
5. Conclusion
To our knowledge, this study is the rst investigation on the
dynamic process of EGCG binding on saliva by QCM-D and
uorescence quenching. The results suggest that the astrin-
gency and loss of lubrication in the oral cavity may be
attributed to the viscoelasticity of EGCG adlayer on the oral
mucosa, the afnity of EGCG to saliva, and the entropy-driven
characteristic of EGCG. Hence, the null hypothesis is rejected.
The hydrogen bonding, the hydrophobic interactions, and the
entropy-drive are the main driving forces for EGCG binding to
saliva, as indicated by the FTIR spectra and the temperature-
promoted EGCG adsorption. The afnities of EGCG to saliva
suggest that whole saliva has a much stronger neutralization
to the effect of EGCG than parotid saliva.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Prof. Qi-Fu Li (Department of Biochemistry
and Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University,
China) for running the adsorption properties of saliva analysis.
The authors also thank the National Natural Science Founda-
tion of China (Grants No.: 20773100) for the nancial supports.-
Funding: None.Competing interests: We declare that we have no
nancial and personal relationships with other people or
organizations that can inappropriately inuence our work,
there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature
or kind in any product, service and/or company that could be
construed as inuencing the position presented in, or the
reviewof, themanuscript entitled.Ethical approval: Not required.
r e f e r e n c e s
1. Rawel HM, Meidtner K, Kroll J. Binding of selected phenolic
compounds to proteins. J Agric Food Chem 2005;53:42235.
2. Ahmad N, Gupta S, Mukhtar H. Green tea polyphenol
epigallocatechin-3-gallate differentially modulates nuclear
factor kappaB in cancer cells versus normal cells. Arch
Biochem Biophys 2000;376:33846.
3. Joiner A, Muller D, Elofsson UM, Arnebrant T. Ellipsometry
analysis of the in vitro adsorption of tea polyphenols onto
salivary pellicles. Eur J Oral Sci 2004;112:5105.
4. Jobstl E, OConnell J, Fairclough JP, Williamson MP.
Molecular model for astringency produced by polyphenol/
protein interactions. Biomacromolecules 2004;5:429.
5. Atsumi T, Tonosaki K, Fujisawa S. Salivary free radical-
scavenging activity is affected by physical and mental
activities. Oral Dis 2008;14:4906.
6. Schipper RG, Silletti E, Vingerhoeds MH. Saliva as research
material: biochemical, physicochemical and practical
aspects. Arch Oral Biol 2007;52:111435.
7. Marx KA. Quartz crystal microbalance: a useful tool for
studying thin polymer lms and complex biomolecular
systems at the solution-surface interface. Biomacromolecules
2003;4:1099120.
8. Dufour C, Dangles O. Flavonoidserum albumin
complexation: determination of binding constants and
binding sites by uorescence spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys
Acta 2005;1721:16473.
9. Proctor GB, Pramanik R, Carpenter GH, Rees GD. Salivary
proteins interact with dietary constituents to modulate
tooth staining. J Dent Res 2005;84:738.
10. Read SM, Northcote DH. Minimization of variation in the
response to different proteins of the Coomassie blue G dye-
binding assay for protein. Anal Biochem 1981;116:5364.
11. Wang X, Ho CT, Huang Q. Investigation of adsorption
behavior of ()-epigallocatechin gallate on bovine serum
albumin surface using quartz crystal microbalance with
dissipation monitoring. J Agric Food Chem 2007;55:498792.
12. Chitpan M, Wang X, Ho CT, Huang Q. Monitoring the
binding processes of black tea thearubigin to the bovine
serum albumin surface using quartz crystal microbalance
with dissipation monitoring. J Agric Food Chem
2007;55:101106.
13. Lakowiz JR. Principles of uorescence spectroscopy. 3rd ed.
Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2006.
14. Hook F, Kasemo B, Nylander T, Fant C, Sott K, Elwing H.
Variations in coupled water, viscoelastic properties, and
lm thickness of a Mefp-1 protein lm during adsorption
and cross-linking: a quartz crystal microbalance with
dissipation monitoring, ellipsometry, and surface plasmon
resonance study. Anal Chem 2001;73:5796804.
15. Green BG. Oral astringency: a tactile component of avor.
Acta Psychol 1993;84:11925.
16. Naim M, Seifert R, Nu rnberg B, Gru nbaum L, Schultz G.
Some taste substances are direct activators of G-proteins.
Biochem J 1994;297:4514.
17. Lesschaeve I, Noble AC. Polyphenols: factors inuencing
their sensory properties and their effects on food and
beverage preferences. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;81:330S5S.
18. Cummins D, Creeth JE. Delivery of antiplaque agents from
dentifrices, gels, and mouthwashes. J Dent Res 1992;71:
4391449.
19. Papadopoulou A, Green RJ, Frazier RA. Interaction of
avonoids with bovine serum albumin: a uorescence
quenching study. J Agric Food Chem 2005;53:15863.
20. Rawel HM, Frey SK, Meidtner K, Kroll J, Schweigert FJ.
Determining the binding afnities of phenolic compounds
to proteins by quenching of the intrinsic tryptophan
uorescence. Mol Nutr Food Res 2006;50:70513.
21. Jensen JL, Lamkin MS, Oppenheim FG. Adsorption of human
salivary proteins to hydroxyapatite: a comparison between
whole saliva and glandular salivary secretions. J Dent Res
1992;71:156976.
22. Bacon JR, Rhodes MJ. Binding afnity of hydrolyzable
tannins to parotid saliva and to proline-rich proteins
derived from it. J Agric Food Chem 2000;48:83843.
a r c hi v e s o f o r a l b i o l og y 5 5 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 4 7 0 4 7 8 478