Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Figure
THE Q
The va
carried
Figu
test t
se
armr
5
headr
EA outcomes
n and magnitud
l model makin
s.
VALIDATION
tory experimen
tion study. The
eight measurin
med to examin
ion experiment
contact pressu
mentations wer
ed through the
ased technique
comes are inve
y in the Finite
t and the occup
load on the sea
e 6. CAD Valida
QUALITY FU
alidation of the
out by studyi
ure 4. Seven sittin
the effects of hav
eat comfort. 1)
rests, 3) UP with
5) BP with armre
rests, 7) BP with
are presented i
de of the high c
ng it easy to fi
N
ntations were c
e preliminary e
ng devices and
ne the distribu
tation was per
ure for a human
re carried out
e traditional se
e. The sitting s
estigated. The l
e Element Anal
pant. Therefore
at with differen
ation by Convent
NCTION DEP
e QFD techniq
ng the QFD o
ng postures were
ving different sea
Up position (UP
h footrests, 4) Ba
ests, 6) BP with
armrests, headr
in a three dime
contact pressur
nd the location
carried out in o
experiments w
d the pressure
ution of huma
formed using
n subject sittin
to validate the
eat comfort eva
scenarios are th
loading distrib
lysis technique
e, several exper
nt postures and
tional Methods
PLOYMENT
que is perform
outcomes for a
e implemented to
at features on th
P), 2) UP with
ack Position (BP)
armrests and
rests and footres
5
ensional map t
re regions. Figu
n of the high c
Figu
order to validat
were geared tow
e mapping sy
n weight load
Tekscan pressu
ng with the ack
e proposed tec
aluation techni
hen simulated
bution analyses
e which exami
riments were p
d seat paramete
VALIDATIO
med by two d
a product evalu
Figure 7. T
a sitting pe
represente
o
e
P),
sts
that gives that
gure 5 shows th
contact pressur
ure 5. Contact P
te the results o
ward calibratin
ystem. Few of
dings on the s
ure mapping s
knowledged po
chnique by exa
ique and comp
in CAD and s
s are important
ines the region
performed to ex
ers.
ON
different techni
uated with trad
Tekscan PBMS d
erson on top of a
ed as a map of h
researcher bett
he FEA results
re in relation t
Pressure in Finite
obtained from t
ng the needed t
f the experime
seat. However
system to explo
ostures (Figure
amining the co
pare them to t
similarities and
t in this study t
ns of pressure p
xamine the dis
iques. The firs
ditional evalua
delivers the conta
a seat cushion. T
high and low pre
ter sense of the
mapped on the
to the touching
e Element
the CAD based
tools including
entations were
r, the foremos
ore the regions
s 6 and 7). The
ontact pressure
the ones of the
d differences o
to be simulated
points between
stribution of the
st technique is
ation technique
act pressure of
The results are
essure region.
e
e
g
d
g
e
st
s
e
e
e
f
d
n
e
s
e
then co
matrix
techniq
implem
design
done by
increme
strong
pressur
are the
pressur
determi
QFD to
techniq
the com
Finally
QFD to
RESUL
Endeav
techniq
results
of the s
features
backres
hardwo
validati
The ne
optimum
observe
updatin
QFD v
average
ompare it to the
in the House o
que for QFD va
menting the QF
parameters (H
y taking each s
ented changes.
relationship w
re when the arm
en interpreted
re to the decrea
ines whether t
o determine th
que are presente
mfort level of t
, the validation
o replace the co
LTS AND DIS
voring to replac
que, the CAD t
manifest the s
seat design. In o
s and seat cu
st angle, armre
ood, memory f
ion.
Figure 8. Seat F
ew CAD obser
m comfort leve
ed from the CA
ng the QFD fro
validation. As
es 13% while it
e QFD observe
of Quality that
alidation is per
FD design para
OWs) and the
seat parameter
. For example,
with armrest he
mrest height is
into comfort
asing of the com
the relationship
he degree of ag
ed in one of th
the new produc
n process prov
omfort value ob
SCUSSIONS
ce the tradition
technique is pr
ystems ability
order to obtain
ushion materia
ests, headrests
foam, gel cush
Features Valida
rvations consis
els (Figure 9).
AD then the n
om the CAD d
depicted in Fi
t was recorded
ed with the cus
test the relatio
formed using t
ameters in the
consumers re
individually th
, in the QFD r
eight (HOW).
s changes to 23
values using a
mfort. The deg
p is strong, m
greement amon
he compartmen
ct compared w
vides new com
btained from th
nal seat comfo
roposed to ove
y to detect the
n proper unders
als were manip
s, and footrest
hion and air-fil
tion Graphs
st of new rela
These values a
new QFD is ins
data. The outc
igure 11, the e
d with an avera
6
stomers feedba
onship among d
the Computer A
CAD softwar
equirements (W
hen observing i
relationship ma
CAD can vali
3in, 24in then 2
a mathematica
gree of deviatio
oderate or we
ng seat param
ts of the QFD
with different p
mfort value to
he customers a
ort evaluation w
ercome the sho
effects of the
standing of the
pulated and t
s. The cushion
lled cushions.
ationship asses
are then update
serted back in
comes of the s
error observed
ge of 6% error
ack. This can b
different produ
Aided Design t
re then testing
WHATs). The Q
its comfort resp
atrix, armrest
idate that by w
25in. The obse
al model that
on of the comf
ak. CAD valid
meters. The Res
chart; the outc
products and is
be conveyed b
appraisal again
with a more ec
ortcomings of s
seat factors th
e importance of
tested for com
n materials co
Figure 8 show
ssments, optim
ed in the QFD
the cycle. Fig
system were co
d from the syst
r after CAD va
Figure 9
be obtained by
ucts. The secon
technique; this
the relationsh
QFD validation
ponse when ex
comfort (WHA
watching the a
erved contact p
relate the inc
fort values obse
dation is perfo
sults obtained
comes shows im
s compared to
back to the fir
nst existing pro
conomical and
such tedious p
hat promote the
f the proposed
mfort; these fe
onsidered in th
ws the outcom
mum seat param
with the prope
gure 10 shows
ompared befor
tem without Q
alidation.
9. CAD Validatio
y constructing a
nd and eminen
s is obtained by
hips among the
n using CAD is
xposed to smal
AT) may show
armrest contac
pressure values
creasing of the
erved via CAD
ormed in every
from the QFD
mprovement o
a set up target
rst stage of the
oducts.
d time effective
procedures. The
e comfort leve
technique, sea
eatures include
his study were
me of the CAD
meters and the
er comfort leve
the process o
re and after the
QFD validation
on Outcomes
a
nt
y
e
s
ll
w
ct
s
e
D
y
D
f
t.
e
e
e
el
at
e
e
D
e
el
f
e
n