Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Human Rights Alert: Large-Scale Fraud in IT Systems of The US Courts - Unannounced Regime Change?

    Uploaded by

    Human Rights Alert - NGO (RA)
    113 views163 pages
    2014-09-01 Human Right Alert (NGO): UPR Submission - United States (2014) Large-scale fraud in IT systems of the US courts - Unannounced regime change Executive Summary Wide segments of the people of the United States today hold that the US government has undergone a transformation over the past couple of decades, and the US Constitution is no longer in force and effect. Instant submission documents that the US Constitution was indeed voided, and that the implementation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems in the US courts was a key event in this regard, which enables widespread judicial corruption and disregard of the law of the United States and the US Constitution. At the same time, such IT systems provide unique evidence of systemic judicial corruption, fraud on the courts, and deprivation of rights. Allegations: 1. The IT systems of the US courts enable the routine conduct of simulated (sham/fake) litigation and the publication of simulated judicial records; 2. Under such circumstances, the rule of law and the US Constitution are effectively voided, access to the courts is effectively denied; 3, Such conditions should be considered unannounced regime change; 4. Such conditions amount to violation of any article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, where integrity of the courts and the justice system is a prerequisite; 5. Corruption of the US courts and the legal profession is a central cause of the current socio-economic crisis in the United States. Evidence: IT system analysis documents: a) Systems developed, implemented with no lawful authority b) Servers of unverified identity; c) Invalid implementation of electronic signatures; d) Invalid implementation of authentication and service procedures; e) Establishing of “double books” systems; f) Invalid implementation of authorities and permissions; g) Discrimination in access to the courts; h) Appearance of attorneys, who are not authorized as Counsel of Record; i) Universal failure to docket summonses; j) Adulteration and deletion of court records; k) Inexplicable differences among the various courts. Case studies document the employment of such systems in the conduct of simulated litigation affecting unlawful deprivation of liberty, property, as well as other Civil, Constitutional, and Human Rights. Today, such corruption is particularly common in litigation related to the banking industry, from fraud on individuals, through fraud on shareholders, taxpayers and the public at large, to fraud on an entire nation (Argentina). Conclusions: 1. Through the implementation and operation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems, the US courts today routinely conduct simulated litigation, unlawfully deprive the liberty and property of individuals, and place the banks above the law. Such conduct amounts to Organized State-corporate Crime. 2. Such conduct amounts to serious violation of fundamental Human Rights of the people of the United States. 3. Such conduct is also central to the current socio-economic crisis, failing banking regulation, and the “Foreclosure Crisis”, which resulted in vast increase in poverty and homelessness. 4. The validity of any legal and judicial records, originating in the United States, and the validity of any litigation in the US courts should be considered dubious. 5. The international community should reassess the nature of the current regime in the United States, particularly relative to serious violations of the Human Rights of the people of the US . 6. Efforts to address conditions, which have been established in the US, and to restore the force and effect of the US Constitution and US law, are likely be protracted and meet stark resistance by powerful US security, legal, and financial interest groups. Recommendations: Emerging from current conditions would require a fundamental and comprehensive corrective process in the US, at a time, when the political process itself is undermined by corruption of the US courts: 1. The large-scale

    Original Title

    2014-08-31 Human Right Alert (NGO): Draft UPR Submission-United States (2014) "Large-scale fraud in IT systems of the US courts - Unannounced regime change?", Appendix I

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    2014-09-01 Human Right Alert (NGO): UPR Submission - United States (2014) Large-scale fraud in IT systems of the US courts - Unannounced regime change Executive Summary Wide segments of the people of the United States today hold that the US government has undergone a transformation over the past couple of decades, and the US Constitution is no longer in force and effect. Instant submission documents that the US Constitution was indeed voided, and that the implementation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems in the US courts was a key event in this regard, which enables widespread judicial corruption and disregard of the law of the United States and the US Constitution. At the same time, such IT systems provide unique evidence of systemic judicial corruption, fraud on the courts, and deprivation of rights. Allegations: 1. The IT systems of the US courts enable the routine conduct of simulated (sham/fake) litigation and the publication of simulated judicial records; 2. Under such circumstances, the rule of law and the US Constitution are effectively voided, access to the courts is effectively denied; 3, Such conditions should be considered unannounced regime change; 4. Such conditions amount to violation of any article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, where integrity of the courts and the justice system is a prerequisite; 5. Corruption of the US courts and the legal profession is a central cause of the current socio-economic crisis in the United States. Evidence: IT system analysis documents: a) Systems developed, implemented with no lawful authority b) Servers of unverified identity; c) Invalid implementation of electronic signatures; d) Invalid implementation of authentication and service procedures; e) Establishing of “double books” systems; f) Invalid implementation of authorities and permissions; g) Discrimination in access to the courts; h) Appearance of attorneys, who are not authorized as Counsel of Record; i) Universal failure to docket summonses; j) Adulteration and deletion of court records; k) Inexplicable differences among the various courts. Case studies document the employment of such systems in the conduct of simulated litigation affecting unlawful deprivation of liberty, property, as well as other Civil, Constitutional, and Human Rights. Today, such corruption is particularly common in litigation related to the banking industry, from fraud on individuals, through fraud on shareholders, taxpayers and the public at large, to fraud on an entire nation (Argentina). Conclusions: 1. Through the implementation and operation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems, the US courts today routinely conduct simulated litigation, unlawfully deprive the liberty and property of individuals, and place the banks above the law. Such conduct amounts to Organized State-corporate Crime. 2. Such conduct amounts to serious violation of fundamental Human Rights of the people of the United States. 3. Such conduct is also central to the current socio-economic crisis, failing banking regulation, and the “Foreclosure Crisis”, which resulted in vast increase in poverty and homelessness. 4. The validity of any legal and judicial records, originating in the United States, and the validity of any litigation in the US courts should be considered dubious. 5. The international community should reassess the nature of the current regime in the United States, particularly relative to serious violations of the Human Rights of the people of the US . 6. Efforts to address conditions, which have been established in the US, and to restore the force and effect of the US Constitution and US law, are likely be protracted and meet stark resistance by powerful US security, legal, and financial interest groups. Recommendations: Emerging from current conditions would require a fundamental and comprehensive corrective process in the US, at a time, when the political process itself is undermined by corruption of the US courts: 1. The large-scale

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    113 views163 pages

    Human Rights Alert: Large-Scale Fraud in IT Systems of The US Courts - Unannounced Regime Change?

    Uploaded by

    Human Rights Alert - NGO (RA)
    2014-09-01 Human Right Alert (NGO): UPR Submission - United States (2014) Large-scale fraud in IT systems of the US courts - Unannounced regime change Executive Summary Wide segments of the people of the United States today hold that the US government has undergone a transformation over the past couple of decades, and the US Constitution is no longer in force and effect. Instant submission documents that the US Constitution was indeed voided, and that the implementation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems in the US courts was a key event in this regard, which enables widespread judicial corruption and disregard of the law of the United States and the US Constitution. At the same time, such IT systems provide unique evidence of systemic judicial corruption, fraud on the courts, and deprivation of rights. Allegations: 1. The IT systems of the US courts enable the routine conduct of simulated (sham/fake) litigation and the publication of simulated judicial records; 2. Under such circumstances, the rule of law and the US Constitution are effectively voided, access to the courts is effectively denied; 3, Such conditions should be considered unannounced regime change; 4. Such conditions amount to violation of any article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, where integrity of the courts and the justice system is a prerequisite; 5. Corruption of the US courts and the legal profession is a central cause of the current socio-economic crisis in the United States. Evidence: IT system analysis documents: a) Systems developed, implemented with no lawful authority b) Servers of unverified identity; c) Invalid implementation of electronic signatures; d) Invalid implementation of authentication and service procedures; e) Establishing of “double books” systems; f) Invalid implementation of authorities and permissions; g) Discrimination in access to the courts; h) Appearance of attorneys, who are not authorized as Counsel of Record; i) Universal failure to docket summonses; j) Adulteration and deletion of court records; k) Inexplicable differences among the various courts. Case studies document the employment of such systems in the conduct of simulated litigation affecting unlawful deprivation of liberty, property, as well as other Civil, Constitutional, and Human Rights. Today, such corruption is particularly common in litigation related to the banking industry, from fraud on individuals, through fraud on shareholders, taxpayers and the public at large, to fraud on an entire nation (Argentina). Conclusions: 1. Through the implementation and operation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems, the US courts today routinely conduct simulated litigation, unlawfully deprive the liberty and property of individuals, and place the banks above the law. Such conduct amounts to Organized State-corporate Crime. 2. Such conduct amounts to serious violation of fundamental Human Rights of the people of the United States. 3. Such conduct is also central to the current socio-economic crisis, failing banking regulation, and the “Foreclosure Crisis”, which resulted in vast increase in poverty and homelessness. 4. The validity of any legal and judicial records, originating in the United States, and the validity of any litigation in the US courts should be considered dubious. 5. The international community should reassess the nature of the current regime in the United States, particularly relative to serious violations of the Human Rights of the people of the US . 6. Efforts to address conditions, which have been established in the US, and to restore the force and effect of the US Constitution and US law, are likely be protracted and meet stark resistance by powerful US security, legal, and financial interest groups. Recommendations: Emerging from current conditions would require a fundamental and comprehensive corrective process in the US, at a time, when the political process itself is undermined by corruption of the US courts: 1. The large-scale

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 163

    Human Rights Alert (NGO)

    Joseph Zernik, PhD


    PO Box 33407, Tel Aviv, Israel
    joseph.zernikhra!n"o.or"
    2014-09-01 Human Right Alert (NGO): UPR Submii!n - Unite" State (2014) - A##en"i$ %
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime
    'hange+
    ,$e'uti-e Summar*
    #i$e se"%en&s o' &he people o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es &o$a* hol$ &ha& &he () "overn%en& has +n$er"one a &rans'or%a&ion over
    &he pas& ,o+ple o' $e,a$es, an$ &he () -ons&i&+&ion is no lon"er in 'or,e an$ e''e,&. Ins&an& s+.%ission $o,+%en&s &ha& &he
    () -ons&i&+&ion /as in$ee$ voi$e$, an$ &ha& &he i%ple%en&a&ion o' invali$, 'ra+$+len& IT s*s&e%s in &he () ,o+r&s /as a ke*
    even& in &his re"ar$, /hi,h ena.les /i$esprea$ j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion an$ $isre"ar$ o' &he la/ o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es an$ &he ()
    -ons&i&+&ion. A& &he sa%e &i%e, s+,h IT s*s&e%s provi$e +ni0+e evi$en,e o' s*s&e%i, j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion, 'ra+$ on &he ,o+r&s,
    an$ $epriva&ion o' ri"h&s.
    Allegati!n:
    1. The IT s*s&e%s o' &he () ,o+r&s ena.le &he ro+&ine ,on$+,& o' si%+la&e$ 2sha%3'ake4 li&i"a&ion an$ &he p+.li,a&ion o'
    si%+la&e$ j+$i,ial re,or$s5 6. (n$er s+,h ,ir,+%s&an,es, &he r+le o' la/ an$ &he () -ons&i&+&ion are e''e,&ivel* voi$e$,
    a,,ess &o &he ,o+r&s is e''e,&ivel* $enie$5 3, )+,h ,on$i&ions sho+l$ .e ,onsi$ere$ +nanno+n,e$ re"i%e ,han"e5 4. )+,h
    ,on$i&ions a%o+n& &o viola&ion o' an* ar&i,le o' &he Universal Declaration of Human Rights, /here in&e"ri&* o' &he ,o+r&s an$
    &he j+s&i,e s*s&e% is a prere0+isi&e5 7. -orr+p&ion o' &he () ,o+r&s an$ &he le"al pro'ession is a ,en&ral ,a+se o' &he ,+rren&
    so,io!e,ono%i, ,risis in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es.
    ,-i"en'e:
    IT s*s&e% anal*sis $o,+%en&s8 a4 )*s&e%s $evelope$, i%ple%en&e$ /i&h no la/'+l a+&hori&* .4 )ervers o' +nveri'ie$ i$en&i&*5
    ,4 Invali$ i%ple%en&a&ion o' ele,&roni, si"na&+res5 $4 Invali$ i%ple%en&a&ion o' a+&hen&i,a&ion an$ servi,e pro,e$+res5 e4
    9s&a.lishin" o' :$o+.le .ooks; s*s&e%s5 '4 Invali$ i%ple%en&a&ion o' a+&hori&ies an$ per%issions5 "4 Dis,ri%ina&ion in a,,ess
    &o &he ,o+r&s5 h4 Appearan,e o' a&&orne*s, /ho are no& a+&horize$ as -o+nsel o' <e,or$5 i4 (niversal 'ail+re &o $o,ke&
    s+%%onses5 j4 A$+l&era&ion an$ $ele&ion o' ,o+r& re,or$s5 k4 Inexpli,a.le $i''eren,es a%on" &he vario+s ,o+r&s.
    -ase s&+$ies $o,+%en& &he e%plo*%en& o' s+,h s*s&e%s in &he ,on$+,& o' si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion a''e,&in" +nla/'+l $epriva&ion
    o' li.er&*, proper&*, as /ell as o&her -ivil, -ons&i&+&ional, an$ =+%an <i"h&s. To$a*, s+,h ,orr+p&ion is par&i,+larl* ,o%%on in
    li&i"a&ion rela&e$ &o &he .ankin" in$+s&r*, 'ro% 'ra+$ on in$ivi$+als, &hro+"h 'ra+$ on sharehol$ers, &axpa*ers an$ &he p+.li,
    a& lar"e, &o 'ra+$ on an en&ire na&ion 2Ar"en&ina4.
    .!n'lui!n:
    1. Thro+"h &he i%ple%en&a&ion an$ opera&ion o' invali$, 'ra+$+len& IT s*s&e%s, &he () ,o+r&s &o$a* ro+&inel* ,on$+,&
    si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion, +nla/'+ll* $eprive &he li.er&* an$ proper&* o' in$ivi$+als, an$ pla,e &he .anks a.ove &he la/. )+,h
    ,on$+,& a%o+n&s &o Or"anize$ )&a&e!,orpora&e -ri%e. 6. )+,h ,on$+,& a%o+n&s &o serio+s viola&ion o' '+n$a%en&al =+%an
    <i"h&s o' &he people o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es. 3. )+,h ,on$+,& is also ,en&ral &o &he ,+rren& so,io!e,ono%i, ,risis, 'ailin" .ankin"
    re"+la&ion, an$ &he :>ore,los+re -risis;, /hi,h res+l&e$ in vas& in,rease in pover&* an$ ho%elessness. 4. The vali$i&* o' an*
    le"al an$ j+$i,ial re,or$s, ori"ina&in" in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, an$ &he vali$i&* o' an* li&i"a&ion in &he () ,o+r&s sho+l$ .e
    ,onsi$ere$ $+.io+s. 7. The in&erna&ional ,o%%+ni&* sho+l$ reassess &he na&+re o' &he ,+rren& re"i%e in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es,
    par&i,+larl* rela&ive &o serio+s viola&ions o' &he =+%an <i"h&s o' &he people o' &he () . ?. 9''or&s &o a$$ress ,on$i&ions, /hi,h
    have .een es&a.lishe$ in &he (), an$ &o res&ore &he 'or,e an$ e''e,& o' &he () -ons&i&+&ion an$ () la/, are likel* .e
    pro&ra,&e$ an$ %ee& s&ark resis&an,e .* po/er'+l () se,+ri&*, le"al, an$ 'inan,ial in&eres& "ro+ps.
    Re'!mmen"ati!n:
    9%er"in" 'ro% &he ,+rren& ,on$i&ions /o+l$ re0+ire a '+n$a%en&al an$ ,o%prehensive ,orre,&ive pro,ess in &he (), a& a
    &i%e, /hen &he poli&i,al pro,ess i&sel' is +n$er%ine$ .* ,orr+p&ion o' &he () ,o+r&s8 1. The lar"e!s,ale 'ra+$ in &he () ,o+r&s,
    /hi,h in 'a,& i%pli,a&es ea,h an$ ever* () si&&in" j+$"e, /o+l$ likel* re0+ire an approa,h s+,h as a Tr+&h an$ <e,on,ilia&ion
    -o%%ission, or a )e,on$ -ons&i&+&ional -onven&ion. 6. D+e &o &he ,en&ral role o' &he A$%inis&ra&ive O''i,e o' &he () -o+r&s
    in i%ple%en&in" &he 'ra+$+len& IT s*s&e%s o' &he () ,o+r&s, &he O''i,e sho+l$ .e res&r+,&+re$ or ,lose$. 3. @eas+res, si%ilar
    &o &hose &aken a ,en&+r* a"o +n$er si%ilar ,ir,+%s&an,es &hro+"h ena,&%en& o' &he Salary Act 21A1A4, /hi,h pla,e$ &he
    ,lerks o' &he () ,o+r&s +n$er &he $ire,& a+&hori&* o' &he A&&orne* Beneral, sho+l$ .e ,onsi$ere$. 4. () le"al an$ ,o%p+&in"
    exper&s sho+l$ .e e%plo*e$ in an ini&ia&ive &o res&ore &he in&e"ri&* o' &he IT s*s&e%s o' &he () ,o+r&s +n$er a,,o+n&a.ili&* &o
    &he () -on"ress, /i&h &he "oal o' %akin" s+,h s*s&e% as &ransparen& as possi.le &o &he p+.li, a& lar"e. 7. In na&ions, /here
    &he separa&ion o' .ran,hes is es&a.lishe$ .* la/, &he ,o+r&s %+s& no& .e per%i&&e$ &o $evelop an$ i%ple%en& &heir o/n IT
    s*s&e%s. ?. =+%an <i"h&s an$ in&erne& a,&ivis&s %+s& keep a /a&,h'+l e*e on &he vali$i&* an$ in&e"ri&* o' IT s*s&e%s o' &he
    ,o+r&s an$ prisons.
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    1/163 TOC:2
    Digitally
    signed by
    Joseph
    Zernik, PhD
    Date:
    2014.09.01
    19:27:05
    +03'00'
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    2/163 TOC:2
    Table of Contents
    Page Section
    1 Executive Summar
    3 A! Human Rights Alert (NGO)
    4 "! Allegations
    5 #! S$ecific allegations
    6 %! Simulate& recor&s' simulate& litigation ( organi)e& state(cor$orate crime
    6 a) Definition
    7 b) Judges are not covered by immunity in simulated litigation
    7 c) Simulated litigation - raceteering! organi"ed state-cor#orate crime!
    and trans-national organi"ed crime
    $ d) %utomated &'nde( of Judicial )orru#tion&
    $ C! Evi&ence
    $ #! *T sstem analsis
    * a) Systems develo#ed! im#lemented +it, no la+ful aut,ority
    11 b) Servers of unverified identity
    1- c) 'nvalid im#lementation of electronic signatures
    1$ d) 'nvalid im#lementation of aut,entication and service #rocedures
    33 e) .stablis,ing of /double boos0 systems
    34 f) 'nvalid im#lementation of aut,orities and #ermissions
    34 g) Discrimination in access to t,e courts
    35 ,) %##earance of attorneys! unaut,ori"ed as )ounsel of 1ecord
    35 i) 2niversal failure to docet summonses3
    3$ 4) %dulterated and missing of court records
    3* ) P%).1 and )56.)7 - inter-court survey
    48 l) '9 systems of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt
    4- -! Case stu&ies
    4- a) Fine v Sheriff of LA County :2SD) )%! 2S)% *t,! and S);92S)
    4$ b) Sieverding et al v. United States Government :2SD) D))
    5- c) Netsphere Inc et al v Baron et al :2SD) 9<=D)
    56 d) Borroer !ianne "ill :2S >anru#tcy )ourt! P%.D)
    5$ e) Borroer #illiam $arsley :2S >anru#tcy )ourt! 9<.D)
    5* f) %erni& v Connor et al :2SDS )%)D)
    63 g) %erni& v 'elson et al :2SD) D))
    65 ,) S(C v Ban& of America Corporation :2SD) =?SD)
    76 i) 'cGarry v Geriatric Facilities of Cape Code) Inc et al :2SD) 5%)
    7$ 4) 'aid of the 'ist Corporation et al v #indsor :2SD) @%=D)
    7* ) N'L Capital v *epu+lic of Argentina :2SD) =?SD)
    $8 l) Leis et al v Gleason et al :2SD) );)
    $3 m) Log Ca+in *epu+licans v USA et al :2SD) )%)D)
    $4 n) Log Ca+in *epu+licans v USA et al :2S)%*)
    $5 o) Citi,ens United v Federal (lection Commission :2SD) D))
    *8 #) Citi,ens United v Federal (lection Commission :S;)92S)
    *4 +! National authorities' civil societ organi)ations' ex$erts' me&ia
    *4 #! Office of Attorne General' ,S +e$artment of -ustice' ."*
    *5 %! "an/ing Regulators
    *6 0! ,S Congress
    *6 1! The 2u&iciar
    A! Human Rights Alert (NGO)
    /igure 10 =+%an <i"h&s Aler& 2CBO4
    9,e -818 Auman 1ig,ts %lert B&A1%&C submission for t,e 2P1 of t,e 2nited States focused on
    conditions in Dos %ngeles )ounty! )alifornia3 9,e submission #rovided documentation of large-
    scale false im#risonment and real estate and financial institution fraud by )alifornia State 4udges in
    collusion +it, attorneys! and financial institutions under #atronage of local! state! and federal la+
    enforcement aut,orities3 9,e submission +as incor#orated by reference into t,e Auman 1ig,ts
    )ouncil B&A1)&C Professional Staff 1e#ort +it, a note referring to /corru#tion of t,e courts and t,e
    legal #rofession and discrimination by la+ enforcement in )alifornia03B
    i
    C
    9,e submission +as in #art based on documentation of large-scale fraud in '9 systems of t,e
    Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! )ounty of Dos %ngeles :Sustain)! and in t,e '9 systems of t,e Dos
    %ngeles )ounty S,eriffEs De#artment :'nmate 'nformation )enter)3 B
    ii
    !
    iii
    C
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    3/163 TOC:2
    Table of Contents (continue&)
    Page Section
    *7 3! The legal $rofession
    *$ 4! Ex$erts
    *$ 5! Civil societ organi)ations
    *$ 6! 7e&ia
    ** E! Com$liance 8ith relevant ,S la8
    ** #! Habeas Cor$us
    181 %! .irst Amen&ment ( the right to file $a$ers in court
    185 0! .irst Amen&ment ( the right to access court recor&s
    185 1!Rules Enabling Act
    186 3! .e&eral Rules of Civil 9roce&ure (&uties of the cler/
    187 4! Authentication an& certification of 2u&icial recor&s' :egal 9rocess
    18$ 5! Electronic Signatures
    18* .! Com$liance 8ith relevant treaties an& conventions
    18* #! "asel Accor&s ( international ban/ing regulation
    118 %! Hague A$ostille Convention (#;4x)
    111 0! ,N Convention against Transnational Organi)e& Crime
    111 G! Retaliation against anti(2u&icial corru$tion activists
    111 #! General
    11- %! Retaliation against +r <erni/' author of instant submission
    113 a) 'n t,e 2S! -818
    135 b) 'n 'srael! -813
    137 H! Historical $ers$ective ( Robber "aron Revival Era!
    13$ *! Conclusions
    13* -! Recommen&ations
    13* =! References
    9,e -813 A1% submission for t,e 2P1 of t,e State of 'srael focused on analysis of t,e '9 systems
    of t,e Su#reme )ourt! t,e district courts! and t,e detaineesE courts in 'srael3 9,e submission
    #rovided documentation of large-scale fraud in suc, system! +,ic, started in -88-3 9,e submission
    +as incor#orated by reference into t,e A1) Professional Staff 1e#ort +it, a note referring to /lac
    of integrity in t,e electronic record systems of t,e Su#reme )ourt! t,e district courts and t,e
    detaineesE courts in 'srael30 B
    iv
    C
    Jose#, Ferni! P,D! t,e aut,or of instant submission! ,as s#eciali"ed over t,e #ast decade in
    analy"ing t,e electronic record systems of courts! #risons! and bans3 Ais re#orts on t,ese sub4ects
    +ere #eer-revie+ed! #ublis,ed and #resented in international com#uter science :data mining) and
    criminology conferences3 B
    v
    C
    % te(t boo on &5ac,ine Dearning& found Dr FerniEs a##lication of data-mining to Auman 1ig,ts
    researc, among &=otable uses&! and summari"ed it as follo+sG B
    vi
    C
    Da&a %inin" o' "overn%en& re,or$s ! par&i,+larl* re,or$s o' &he j+s&i,e s*s&e% 2i.e., ,o+r&s, prisons4 !
    ena.les &he $is,over* o' s*s&e%i, h+%an ri"h&s viola&ions in ,onne,&ion &o "enera&ion an$
    p+.li,a&ion o' invali$ or 'ra+$+len& le"al re,or$s .* vario+s "overn%en& a"en,ies. D
    vii
    ,
    viii
    E
    't is liely t,at t,e A1% submission for t,e -818 2P1 of t,e 2nited States! and even more so t,e
    A1% submission for t,e -813 2P1 of t,e State of 'srael! are t,e first-ever Auman 1ig,ts re#orts
    t,at are focused on '9 system analysis and data mining of suc, systems3
    H,ereas t,e -818 A1% submission focused on t,e )alifornia courts and #risons and t,eir '9
    systems! instant submission focuses on t,e 2S federal courts and t,eir res#ective '9 systems3
    "! Allegations
    .(#ert IuotesG
    1ith !nl* 23 !( the 4!rl"5 #!#ulati!n6 the U0S0 ha 223 !( the 4!rl"5 #ri!n #!#ulati!n 7
    that ma8e u the 4!rl"5 larget 9ailer0
    A-F( D
    ix
    E
    000 a *tem in 4hi'h !nl* the little #e!#le ha-e t! !be* the la46 4hile the ri'h6 an" ban8er
    e#e'iall*6 'an 'heat an" "e(rau" 4ith!ut '!ne:uen'e0
    Pa+l Gr+"%an, 9,ono%i,s Co.el prize /inner D
    x
    E
    % thin8 it; "i((i'ult t! (in" a (rau" !( thi i<e !n the US '!urt *tem in US hit!r*0 % 'an;t
    thin8 !( !ne 4here *!u ha-e literall* ten !( th!uan" !( (rau"ulent "!'ument (ile" in ten
    !( th!uan" !( 'ae0
    <a*%on$ Bres,ia, a visi&in" pro'essor a& Hale Fa/ ),hool D
    xi
    E
    /igure 20 -over o' Ti%e %a"azine 'or () In$epen$en,e Da*, J+l* 4, 6011 ! shre$$e$ () -ons&i&+&ion
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    4/163 TOC:2
    Hide segments of t,e #eo#le of t,e 2nited States! from mainstream media! t,roug, rig,t- and left-
    +ing #olitical activists! to Aarvard la+ #rofessors B
    (ii
    !
    (iii
    C today ,old t,at t,e 2S government ,as
    undergone a transformation over t,e #ast cou#le of decades! +,ic, entailed t,e voiding of t,e 2S
    )onstitution3
    Suc, notion is furt,er su##orted by t,e statements of none ot,er t,an former 2S President Jimmy
    )arter! t,at t,e 2S /,as no functioning democracy0! B
    (iv
    C and a call by none ot,er t,an t,e ),air of
    t,e Senate Judiciary )ommittee for t,e institution of a 9rut, and 1econciliation )ommission on t,e
    2S De#artment of Justice3 B
    (v
    C Suc, commissions are ty#ically instituted in nations t,at emerge
    from under tyrannical regimes333
    'n t,e e(treme! suc, notion gives rise to various dissident grou#s! including! but not limited to
    &Sovereign Peo#le&!B
    (vi
    C &7reemen&!B
    (vii
    C and t,e armed &Hell 1egulated 5ilitias&3 B
    (viii
    C 9,e latterEs
    recent standoff +it, armed federal forces around t,e =evada >undy ranc, +as an un#recedented
    incident in 2S ,istory3 B
    (i(
    C
    'f true! t,e voiding of t,e 2S )onstitution by t,e 2S government s,ould be vie+ed as an
    unannounced regime c,ange in t,e 2nited States3
    'nstant submission #rovides am#le evidence t,at t,e 2S )onstitution +as indeed voided3
    >ot, e(#erts and t,e #ublic at large also reali"e t,at +ides#read corru#tion of t,e 2S 4udiciary in
    #articular! and t,e 2S 4ustice system in general! is central to suc, conditions3 B
    ((
    !
    ((i
    !
    ((ii
    C 5oreover!
    bot, e(#erts and t,e #ublic at large reali"e t,at corru#tion of t,e 2S courts and t,e 2S 4ustice
    system is directly tied to t,e current socio-economic crisis in t,e 2nited States! its failing baning
    regulation! t,e ongoing foreclosure fraud e#idemic! and t,e +idening ga#s bet+een t,e ric, and t,e
    #oor! cou#led +it, d+indling of t,e traditional middle-class3 B
    ((iii
    !
    ((iv
    !
    ((v
    C
    'nstant submission documents t,at +ides#read corru#tion of t,e 2S 4udiciary! 2S De#artment of
    Justice! and t,e 2S legal #rofession is indeed central to suc, conditions! and t,at t,e
    im#lementation of invalid fraudulent '9 systems in t,e 2S courts! +,ic, started some t+o decades
    ago +as a ey event in establis,ing current conditions - voiding t,e 2S )onstitution and t,e rule of
    la+ - and in enabling +ides#read 4udicial corru#tion3 Hit, it! t,e same '9 systems #rovide a uniIue
    +ay to document t,e corru#tion of t,e 2S 4ustice system today3
    /igure =0 PA-9< is &he p+.li, a,,ess s*s&e% o' &he () $is&ri,& ,o+r&s an$ () ,o+r&s o' appeals, an$
    -@39-> is &he respe,&ive ,ase %ana"e%en& an$ ele,&roni, 'ilin" s*s&e%.
    9,e fraud in,erent in t,e '9 systems of t,e 2S courts is not t,e ty#ical s#oradic corru#tion! +,ic,
    can be found in any 4ustice system at any time to some degree or anot,er3 't is corru#tion! +,ic,
    +as centrally im#lemented! and +,ic, eac, and every sitting 2S 4udge must be a+are of! as +ell as
    any intelligent and ca#able attorney! +,o a##ears before t,e 2S courts3
    #! S$ecific allegations
    13 9,e '9 systems of t,e 2S courts enable t,e routine conduct of simulated :s,am6fae) litigation
    and t,e #ublication of simulated 4udicial records :see Section )-)3
    -3 2nder suc, circumstances! t,e rule of la+ and t,e 2S )onstitution are effectively sus#ended3
    ;t,er+ise stated! access to civil courts :as o##osed to military tribunals)! o#erating under t,e
    la+ of t,e 2nited States! is effectively denied3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    5/163 TOC:2
    33 Suc, transformation of t,e 2S 4ustice system s,ould be considered an unannounced regime
    c,ange3 )urrent conditions are ty#ical of a nation under martial la+3
    43 Suc, conditions s,ould be deemed in violation of any article of t,e Universal !eclaration of
    "uman *ights! +,ere integrity of t,e courts and t,e 4ustice system is a #rereIuisite3
    %! Simulate& recor&s' simulate& litigation ( organi)e& state(cor$orate crime
    9,e main claim of instant submission is t,at t,roug, t,e im#lementation and em#loyment of invalid
    '9 systems in t,e 2S courts! t,e 2S courts today issue and #ublis, 4udicial and clerical records t,at
    are invalid and void on t,eir faces3 9,roug, t,e em#loyment of suc, invalid '9 systems and void
    records issued in t,em! t,e 2S courts routinely and deliberately conduct s,am litigation and issue
    abusive orders and 4udgments in #atent violation of t,e 2S )onstitution and 2S la+3 1egardless of
    t,e invalidity of suc, orders and 4udgments! t,e courts induce or e(tort com#liance +it, t,em to
    de#rive #ersons of liberty! #ro#erty and ot,er )ivil! )onstitutional! and Auman 1ig,ts3
    a) Definitions: "Simulated Litigation", "Simulated Court Record", "Fraud upon the court"
    9,e 9e(as Penal )ode J 3-34$! #ertaining to &Simulating Degal Process& saysG
    Texas Penal -o$e ! )e,&ion 36.4I. )i%+la&in" Fe"al Pro,ess
    J 36.4I. )I@(FATICB F9BAF P<O-9)).
    2a4 A person ,o%%i&s an o''ense i' &he person re,klessl* ,a+ses &o .e $elivere$ &o ano&her an*
    $o,+%en& &ha& si%+la&es a s+%%ons, ,o%plain&, j+$"%en&, or o&her ,o+r& pro,ess /i&h &he in&en& &o8
    214 in$+,e pa*%en& o' a ,lai% 'ro% ano&her person5 or
    264 ,a+se ano&her &o8
    2A4 s+.%i& &o &he p+&a&ive a+&hori&* o' &he $o,+%en&5 or
    2B4 &ake an* a,&ion or re'rain 'ro% &akin" an* a,&ion in response &o &he $o,+%en&, in
    ,o%plian,e /i&h &he $o,+%en&, or on &he .asis o' &he $o,+%en&.
    2.4 Proo' &ha& &he $o,+%en& /as %aile$ &o an* person /i&h &he in&en& &ha& i& .e 'or/ar$e$ &o &he
    in&en$e$ re,ipien& is a s+''i,ien& sho/in" &ha& &he $o,+%en& /as $elivere$.
    2,4 I& is no& a $e'ense &o prose,+&ion +n$er &his se,&ion &ha& &he si%+la&in" $o,+%en&
    214 s&a&es &ha& i& is no& le"al pro,ess5 or
    264 p+rpor&s &o have .een iss+e$ or a+&horize$ .* a person or en&i&* /ho $i$ no& have la/'+l
    a+&hori&* &o iss+e or a+&horize &he $o,+%en&.
    2$4 I' i& is sho/n on &he &rial o' an o''ense +n$er &his se,&ion &ha& &he si%+la&in" $o,+%en& /as 'ile$
    /i&h, presen&e$ &o, or $elivere$ &o a ,lerk o' a ,o+r& or an e%plo*ee o' a ,lerk o' a ,o+r& ,rea&e$ or
    es&a.lishe$ +n$er &he ,ons&i&+&ion or la/s o' &his s&a&e, &here is a re.+&&a.le pres+%p&ion &ha& &he
    $o,+%en& /as $elivere$ /i&h &he in&en& $es,ri.e$ .* )+.se,&ion 2a4.
    2e4 9x,ep& as provi$e$ .* )+.se,&ion 2'4, an o''ense +n$er &his se,&ion is a -lass A %is$e%eanor.
    2'4 I' i& is sho/n on &he &rial o' an o''ense +n$er &his se,&ion &ha& &he $e'en$an& has previo+sl* .een
    ,onvi,&e$ o' a viola&ion o' &his se,&ion, &he o''ense is a s&a&e jail 'elon*.
    A$$e$ .* A,&s 1AA7, 77&h Fe"., ,h. 1IA, J 3, e''. @a* 61, 1AA7.
    9,e 9e(as la+! cited above! is useful in outlining t,e ty#ical conduct t,at is em#loyed by 4udges and
    court #ersonnel in issuing simulated records and conducting simulated litigationG
    'ssue 4udicial and6or clerical records t,at are invalid! void on t,eir faces3
    Sign! send! docet and6or #ublis, suc, 4udicial and6or clerical records by unaut,ori"ed #ersons3
    Serve false records t,at induce t,eir receiver to believe t,at t,ey are valid and effectual
    summonses! com#laints! orders! or 4udgments3
    @enerate! send! and6or #ublis, false aut,entication records for suc, 4udicial and6or clerical
    records3
    Sign! send! and6or #ublis, 4udicial and6or clerical records of vague and ambiguous language!
    +,ic, t,e court may deem #atently invalid! but t,e receiver is induced to believe are valid3
    'nduce and6or e(tort submission to t,e false aut,ority of suc, records3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    6/163 TOC:2
    %s detailed belo+! relative to t,e in,erent invalidity of t,e '9 systems of t,e 2S courts! and as
    documented in t,e case studies! outlined belo+! t,e 2S courts today routinely engage in t,e conduct
    of simulated litigation3
    'n terms of 2S la+! t,e conduct of simulated litigation! as defined in t,e 9e(as Penal )ode J3-34$!
    by court officers including 4udges! clers! and attorneys s,ould be deemed &7raud u#on t,e )ourt&3
    'n Bulloch v. United States! 763 73-d 1115! 11-1 :18t, )ir3 1*$5)! t,e )ourt statesG
    >ra+$ +pon &he ,o+r& is 'ra+$ /hi,h is $ire,&e$ &o &he j+$i,ial %a,hiner* i&sel' an$ is no& 'ra+$
    .e&/een &he par&ies or 'ra+$+len& $o,+%en&s, 'alse s&a&e%en&s or perj+r*. ... I& is /here &he ,o+r& or a
    %e%.er is ,orr+p&e$ or in'l+en,e$ or in'l+en,e is a&&e%p&e$ or /here &he j+$"e has no& per'or%e$
    his j+$i,ial '+n,&ion !!! &h+s /here &he i%par&ial '+n,&ions o' &he ,o+r& have .een $ire,&l* ,orr+p&e$.
    9,e main claim of instant submission is t,at 2S 4udges! from t,e 2S district courts! t,roug, t,e 2S
    courts of a##eals! to t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt! today routinely engage in 7raud u#on t,e )ourt3
    .ven if some 4udges do not #ersonally engage in suc, conduct! it is im#ossible t,at a #erson! +,o is
    a &+ell-Iualified& 2S 4udge! and +,ose daily routine is governed by o#erating P%).1 and
    )56.)7! is not a+are of t,e fraud in,erent in t,e design and o#eration of t,e systems3 9,erefore!
    even suc, 4udges s,ould be deemed engaging in 5is#rision of 7elonies3
    Suc, massive >reac, of t,e ;at,s of ;ffice and criminality from t,e benc, of t,e 2S 4udiciary as a
    class s,ould be deemed voiding of t,e 2S )onstitution! and t,erefore an unannounced regime
    c,ange in t,e 2nited States3
    b) Judges are not covered b immunit in simulated litigation
    9,e conduct associated +it, simulated litigation is e(tra-4udicial activity! sinceG
    Suc, 4udges do not act under t,eir 4udicial aut,ority3 See for e(am#le! invalid %ssignment and
    1eferral ;rders in %erni& v Connor et al! section 3cf and @-a - bot, 2S Judge Kirginia P,illi#s
    and 2S 5agistrate )arla Hoe,rle +ere acting +it, no valid assignment to t,e case! and
    Suc, 4udges issue records t,at are not aut,ori"ed by 2S la+3
    9,erefore! suc, conduct is not covered by any 4udicial immunity3
    7or additional detailed discussion of immunity! or lac t,ereof in relations,i# to t,e conduct of
    simulated litigation! see 7irst %mended )om#laint in %erni& v Connor et al3 B
    ((vi
    C
    c) Simulated litigation should be deemed rac!eteering, or state"corporate organi#ed crime
    9,e #ractice of simulated litigation s,ould most liely be deemed raceteering #er t,e 2S
    *ac&eteer Influenced and Corrupt -rgani,ations Act :2S) J1*61)! namely! a cons#iracy to conduct
    an enter#rise t,roug, a #attern of raceteering activity3
    9,e notion of 4udges and courts acting as a raceteering enter#rises is not ne+ at all3 'n t,e most
    recent e(am#le! former Pennsylvania Judge )iavarella +as #rosecuted and convicted on
    raceteering c,arges in t,e +ae of t,e &Lids for )as,& corru#tion scandal in PennsylvaniaG B
    ((vii
    C
    K@r. -iavarella a.+se$ his posi&ion o' &r+s& an$ in'li,&e$ a $eep an$ las&in" /o+n$ on &he ,o%%+ni&*
    he vo/e$ &o servi,e,K (.). A&&orne* Pe&er )%i&h sai$ 'ollo/in" &he sen&en,in".
    KThe s,he%e involve$ a ,orr+p& a"ree%en& /i&h &he opera&ors o' &he 'or!pro'i& j+venile 'a,ili&ies,K
    )%i&h sai$. KI& /as a /holesale arran"e%en& in /hi,h &he j+$"es ,on,eale$ &heir in&eres& an$ &here.*
    $i$ "rea& $a%a"e &o &he p+.li,.K
    The (.). A&&orne*Ls o''i,e ,alle$ &he ,ase &he Klar"es& an$ %os& s+s&aine$ poli&i,al ,orr+p&ion in0+ir*K
    in &he area.
    -iavarella /as ,onvi,&e$ in >e.r+ar* o' 16 ,har"es, in,l+$in" ra,ke&eerin" ,onspira,* an$ %one*
    la+n$erin".
    H,ereas t,e conviction of former 4udge )iavarella +as related to t,e #rison industry! instant
    submission claims t,at t,e most common 4udicial enter#rises in t,e 2S today are related to t,e
    baning industry3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    7/163 TOC:2
    Hit, it! t,e notion t,at a 2S court +ould find +ides#read raceteering in t,e 2S courts is obviously
    unliely3
    Ao+ever! t,e range of conduct of t,e 2S courts and 2S 4ustice system e(ceed t,e territorial 2SG
    'n decriminali"ing torture and t,e de#rivation of Diberty in t,e @uantanamo >ay detention center
    and in a net+or of &blac ,ole& #risons +orld-+ideM B
    ((viii
    C
    'n facilitating t,e unla+ful de#rivation of #ro#erty outside t,e 2S! as detailed for e(am#le! in t,e
    case of N'L Capital v *epu+lic of Argentina :section )-)! and
    'n decriminali"ing t,e involvement of 2S agencies in trans-national drug and firearms
    trafficing! B
    ((i(
    !
    (((
    C and decriminali"ing t,e involvement of 2S bans in trans-national money
    laundering for drug cartels3 B
    (((i
    !
    (((ii
    !
    (((iii
    C
    9,erefore! suc, conduct s,ould also be revie+ed under t,e terms of t,e United Nations Convention
    against .ransnational -rgani,ed Crime :-888)3 B
    (((iv
    C
    )onditions! +,ere a nationEs 4ustice system engages in suc, cons#iracy is also referred to in
    criminology as &State ;rgani"ed )rime&! or &State-cor#orate ;rgani"ed )rime&3
    d) $utomated "%nde& of Judicial Corruption"
    'n,erent to t,e +or! #resented in instant submission! is t,e notion t,at t,e '9 systems of t,e 2S
    courts #rovide a uniIue database! +,ic, records t,e conduct of t,e 2S courts and 4ustice system
    today3 9,roug, t,e use of routine data mining tec,niIues! suc, database could #rovide an &'nde( of
    Judicial )orru#tion& across t,e 2S and going bac about t+o decades3 B
    (((v
    C
    Suc, &'nde( of Judicial )orru#tion& can #rovide detailed analysis of 4udicial corru#tion in t,e 2S
    courts by #arameters! suc, as - 4udge! court! year! cause of action! #arties! la+-firms3
    C! Evi&ence
    9,e 2S government ,as com#leted a decade-long #ro4ect of transition to digital administration of
    t,e 2S courts at a cost t,at is estimated at several billion 2S dollars3 )ourts of nations around t,e
    +orld are going t,roug, a similar #rocess! and 2nited =ations re#orts on strengt,ening 4udicial
    integrity #romote t,e #rocess3 ;bviously! '9 systems could en,ance t,e reliability and trans#arency
    of t,e courts3
    1ecord ee#ing and information #rocessing under #a#er administration of t,e courts ,ave evolved
    over centuries! and formed t,e core of due #rocess and fair ,earings3 9,e transition to electronic
    administration of t,e courts affected a sea c,ange in suc, court #rocedures3
    9,e evidence #resented belo+ includes analysis of t,e design and o#eration of '9 systems of t,e 2S
    courts! as +ell as data mining of records from numerous courts cases3 B
    (((vi
    !
    (((vii
    C Suc, analysis
    documents fundamental fla+s in system validity! integrity! and o#eration! and +ides#read
    corru#tion of t,e courts3
    #! *T sstem analsis
    'nstant submission revie+s t,e follo+ing courts and t,eir res#ective '9 systemsG
    2S district courts - P%).1 and )56.)7
    2S courts of a##eals - P%).1 and )56.)7
    2S Su#reme )ourt - name unno+n
    9+o systems +ere im#lemented in t,e 2S district courts and courts of a##ealsG
    P%).1 N for Public %ccess to )ourt .lectronic 1ecords! and
    )56.)7 N for )ase 5anagement and .lectronic )ourt 7iling3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    8/163 TOC:2
    %nalysis of t,e design and o#eration of '9 systems of t,e 2S courts and data mining of records
    from numerous courts cases! documents fundamental fla+s in system s#ecification! validity!
    integrity! and o#eration3
    a) 'he sstems (ere developed and implemented (ith no la(ful authorit
    9,e ne+ '9 systems re#resent a sea-c,ange in court #rocedures! but bot, t,e courts and t,e 2S
    )ongress failed to establis, t,e ne+ electronic court #rocedures by la+ :see section .47! belo+)3
    Procedures of t,e 2S courts under #a#er administration evolved from t,e .nglis, legal system! and
    +ere establis,ed in t,e US Code of Civil $rocedures) US Code of Criminal $rocedure and
    #ublis,ed Local *ules!+,ic, t,e courts +ere aut,ori"ed to ado#t! sub4ect to #rior #ublication of
    suc, rules for #ublic comment and c,allenge3
    9,e transition to digital administration of t,e 2S courts inevitably entailed a sea- c,ange in court
    #rocedures! +,ic, ,ad to be establis,ed by la+ or by t,e #ublication of ne+ local rules3
    1evie+ of t,e Local *ules of court of t,e various 2S courts and 2S courts of a##eals! B
    (((viii
    !
    (((i(
    C
    universally revealed no direct reference to P%).1! )56.)7! or ne+ digital #rocedures #ertaining
    to valid signatures and aut,entication! notice and service! and #ublic access to court records3
    'n some cases! reference! albeit vague and ambiguous! +as found in General -rders of t,e courts3
    9,e courts +ere not aut,ori"ed to establis, court #rocedures in General -rders :see furt,er details
    under section )1d) 3
    Ao+ever! in t,e vast ma4ority of t,e courts! +,ic, +ere e(amined! no reference +as made
    any+,ere in t,e Docal 1ules! in @eneral ;rders3 B
    (l
    C
    'n various courts! t,e ne+ #rocedures +ere vaguely described in Users 'anuals. B
    (li
    C Ao+ever!
    suc, #ublications could by no means be considered valid and effectual legal records3
    Implementation of $AC(* and C'/(CF in the US !istrict Court) Central !istrict of
    California
    .!urt Rule !(
    .!urt
    General Or"er Uer >anual
    US ?itri't .!urt
    .entral .ali(!rnia
    Cone Beneral Or$er 0I!
    06
    De&aile$ Des,rip&ion o' ele,&roni, 'ilin"
    pra,&i,es in an :+no''i,ial; %an+al
    US .!urt !( A##eal6
    9th .ir'uit
    Cone Cone De&aile$ Des,rip&ion o' ele,&roni, 'ilin"
    pra,&i,es in %an+al.
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    9/163 TOC:2
    /igure 40 Ta.le )+%%ar* o' in'or%a&ion so+r,es per&ainin" &o ele,&roni, 'ilin" 'or &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,&
    o' -ali'ornia an$ &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, A&h -ir,+i&
    Detailed evidence for t,e lac of aut,ority of P%).1 and )56.)7! as im#lemented in t,e 2S
    District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! is #resented in corres#ondence +it, t,e ;ffice of t,e
    )ler :see section @-a! belo+)3
    @eneral ;rder 8$-8-
    2#on inIuiry! t,e office of t,e cler! 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! claimed t,at
    t,e ne+ rules +ere establis,ed in General -rder 8$-8-3 B
    (lii
    C
    9,e order s,ould be deemed standing in violation of t,e *ules (na+ling Act :section .4)! since it
    amounts to an unaut,ori"ed sea-c,ange in t,e Federal *ules of Civil $rocedure3
    'n t,is conte(t! it s,ould be noted t,at t,e General -rder 8$-8- +as #ublis,ed +it, no name of its
    aut,or and no signature of a 4udge and no aut,entication by t,e )ler of t,e )ourt3 'n contrast!
    most ot,er @eneral ;rders of t,e same )ourt are signed by t,e Presiding Judge of t,e )ourt3 B
    (liii
    C
    9,e lac of aut,ority and invalidity of t,e im#lementation of P%).1 and )56.)7 in t,e 2S
    District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia and a reIuest to void General -rder 8$-8- +ere raised
    in Dr FerniEs 5otion to 'ntervene in Log Ca+in *epu+licans v USA et al in t,e 2S )ourt of
    %##eals! *t, )ircuit3 :see section )-n)3 9,e #leading claimed t,at t,e General -rder 8$-8- of t,e
    2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia amounted to De#rivation of 1ig,ts 2nder t,e )olor
    of Da+! since for e(am#le! it unla+fully establis,ed discrimination bet+een attorneys and #ro-se
    filers in access to t,e court and in de#rived t,e #ublic at large from access to ins#ect and to co#y
    court records3 B
    (liv
    C
    &2nofficial& %nderson 5anual
    9,e ot,er ma4or source for information regarding t,e im#lementation of P%).1 and )56.)7 in
    t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! and t,eir mode of o#eration is t,e 2nofficial
    %nderson 5anual3 B
    (lv
    C Suc, #ublication can by no means be deemed a valid legal record!
    #articularly on suc, ey issues! relative to due #rocess and fair ,earings3
    7or e(am#leG
    - 1egarding t,e critical issue of &.lectronic Document Stam#& in t,e =.7! t,e &2nofficial&
    %nderson 5anual say onlyG :#13)
    The C9> in,l+$es a :$o,+%en& n+%.er; an$ a link. Be s+re &o no&e &ha& $o,+%en&
    n+%.er, as *o+ /ill nee$ i& i' *o+ nee$ &o e!%ail a propose$ or$er &o &he -o+r&. The C9> also
    in,l+$es an :9le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%p; /hi,h is a s&rin" o' le&&ers an$ n+%.ers /hi,h -o+r& s&a''
    ,an +se &o veri'* &he a+&hen&i,i&* o' &he C9>. The C9> also ,on&ains &he pa&h an$ 'ile na%e o' &he
    $o,+%en& *o+ +ploa$e$ an$ an* a&&a,h%en&s.
    9,e manual fails to mention t,e significance of t,e &.lectronic Document Stam#& for aut,entication
    of 4udicial and clerical records3 9,e manual also im#lies t,at t,at stam# verification utility is not
    accessible to )56.)7 users in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia :see section
    )1d)3
    )ombined +it, t,e #ractice of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! of conducting
    simulated litigation! +,ere none of t,e 4udicial records bears t,e stam#! and ot,er records bear
    invalid! truncated &.lectronic Document Stam#&! t,ese omissions must raise concerns regarding t,e
    intention and integrity of t,e manual :see also sections )1d! @-a)3
    - 1egarding filing t,e summonses as e(ecuted! t,e manual saysG :#1$)
    Ori"inal )+%%ons8 re&+rne$3no& re&+rne$
    N!te: )here i alm!t ne-er a rea!n t! return the Summ!n6 ! "!n5t "! it unle *!u
    (eel*!u mut0
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    10/163 TOC:2
    ThereMs a spe,ial vi$eo &rainin" %o$+le on &he -o+r&Ms /e.!si&e a.o+& ho/ &o re&+rn&he ori"inal
    )+%%ons, so i' *o+ $e,i$e *o+ nee$ &o re&+rn a )+%%ons, .e s+re &o /a&,h &ha& vi$eo.
    )ombined +it, t,e custom of t,e 2S district courts of not doceting t,e summonses! in a##arent
    violation of t,e Federal *ules of Civil $rocedure! :see section )1i)! t,is note raises concerns
    regarding intention and integrity of t,e manual3
    Implementation of $AC(* and C'/(CF in the US Court of Appeals) 0th Circuit
    9,e lac of aut,ority and invalidity in im#lementation of P%).1 and )56.)7 is discussed in
    greater detail in t+o #a#ers! in t,e form of 1eIuests for .(#erts ;#inions3 B
    (lvi
    C
    Suffice is to say t,at ,ere too! t,e main source of information regarding t,e systems is a 2sers
    5anual and a video3 B
    (lvii
    C
    Specification) !evelopment 'anagement) 1alidation of I. systems of the courts
    'n general! it is claimed t,at t,ere is no +ay t,at t,e '9 systems of t,e courts could be deemed of
    integrity and validity! absent full documentation of la+ful s#ecification! develo#ment management!
    and validation by #ersons of adeIuate aut,ority3 B
    (lviii
    C
    =o evidence of suc, Iuintessential measures ,ave ever been discovered! relative to t,e develo#ment
    and im#lementation of P%).1 and )56.)7 in t,e 2S district and a##eals courts! or t,e '9 systems
    of t,e Su#reme )ourt3
    7urt,ermore! t,e '9 systems of t,e courts are in fact translation of t,e la+ into o#erable
    #rogramming code! +,ic, is inaccessible to t,e #ublic3 9,erefore! t,e aut,ority for s#ecification!
    develo#ment management and validation of suc, systems must reside outside of t,e 4udicial branc,!
    most liely under t,e legislative branc,3 'n contrast! t,e develo#ment and im#lementation of
    P%).1 and )56.)7 and t,e systems of t,e Su#reme )ourt +ere carried out by t,e %dministrative
    ;ffice of t,e 2S )ourts! under t,e 4udicial branc,3 B
    (li(
    C
    )onduct of t,e %dministrative ;ffice of t,e 2S )ourts in t,is regard is claimed to be an
    un#recedented s,ell-game fraud on t,e #eo#le of t,e 2nited States3
    7inally! it is claimed t,at #ursuant to t,e fundamental #rinci#le of Publicity of t,e Da+! '9 systems
    must be as trans#arent to t,e #ublic as #ossible3 Die+ise! t,e records! #ertaining to t,e
    aut,oritative s#ecification! develo#ment! and validation s,ould be #ublicly accessible3 'n contrast!
    t,e P%).1 and )56.)7 #latforms! in t,eir variable im#lementations in 2S district and a##eals
    courts t,roug,out t,e 2nited States! and lie+ise t,e '9 systems of t,e Su#reme )ourt! are &blac
    bo(es& from t,e #ublicEs #ers#ective3 1egardless of intensive efforts to infer rules t,roug, data
    mining! it is im#ossible to deci#,er t,e rules embedded in suc, systems! and t,e variations among
    t,em in t,e various 2S courts3
    Ao+ever! t,e common t,eme is clearG .ac, and every 2S court im#lemented and o#erates its local
    '9 systems :even +,en using t,e same common P%).1 and )56.)7 #latforms) in a manner t,at
    +ould enable it to generate and #ublis, online 4udicial and clerical records! as +ell as case docets!
    +,ic, are not deemed valid and effectual! #ursuant to t,e 2S la+! by t,e res#ective court! but
    +ould a##ear as valid and effectual records to t,e #ublic at large3
    Suc, systems t,en #ermit 4udges and clers to conduct simulated litigation :see section >-)! +,ic,
    t,at ,as no foundation in t,e la+ of t,e 2nited States3 %t times! as s,o+n in some of t,e cases
    belo+! suc, litigation reac,es bi"arre outcome! +,ic, is so abusive! t,at no legal reasoning or
    common sense could 4ustify3
    %nd yet! t,e 2S courts are ready! +illing! able to induce and6or e(tort t,e submission to suc,
    invalid! unla+ful records :see more under Netsphere et al v Baron et al! section )-c)
    b) Servers of unverified identit
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    11/163 TOC:2
    /igure 20 )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es ! +n,er&i'ie$ server i$en&i&*. The -hro%e .ro/ser %essa"es
    in$i,a&e8 a4 I$en&i&* o' &his si&e is +nveri'ie$. .4 -onne,&ion &o &his si&e is no& en,r*p&e$.
    (<F8 h&&p833///.s+pre%e,o+r&."ov3
    /igure @0 () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia ! +n,er&i'ie$ server i$en&i&*. The -hro%e .ro/ser
    %essa"es in$i,a&e8 a4 I$en&i&* o' &his si&e is +nveri'ie$. .4 -onne,&ion &o &his si&e is no& en,r*p&e$.
    (<F8 h&&p833///.,a,$.+s,o+r&s."ov3
    Public access to 2S district and a##eals court records is effectively #ermitted only t,roug, P%).13
    Ao+ever! t,e identity of t,e servers! from +,ic, t,e records are dis#layed and do+nloaded is
    unverified3
    % ty#ical bro+ser /#age info0 statement for P%).1 isG
    #e.si&e I$en&i&*
    #e.si&e8 h&&p833///.pa,er."ov3
    O/nership8 This /e.si&e $oes no& s+ppl* o/nership in'or%a&ion.
    Neri'ie$ .*8 Co& spe,i'ie$
    Te,hni,al De&ails
    -onne,&ion Co& 9n,r*p&e$.
    9,e im#lementation of servers of unidentified and unverified identity for 2S court records! in itself!
    s,ould be deemed a critical failure in system integrity and validity3
    c) %nvalid implementation of electronic signatures
    9oday! all records of t,e 2S district and a##eals courts are electronic records3 Ao+ever! t,ere is no
    valid im#lementation of visible electronic signatures on any suc, records3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    12/163 TOC:2
    1evie+ of t,e records in t,e cases #resented belo+! s,o+s a variety of forms of signatures on
    electronic recordsG
    Scanned images of ,and-signatures
    6s6
    9y#ed =ame! e3g3! Jo,n Doe
    =o signature at all3
    =one of t,ese s,ould be deemed valid electronic signatures3
    /igure A0 Invali$ j+$"eLs si"na&+re in Huminski v Rutland Police Dept et al 218AA!,v!001?04 in
    &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Ner%on&, a -ivil <i"h&s %a&&er. The >e.r+ar* 16, 6010 Or$er .* () J+$"e Barvan
    @+r&ha e%plo*s a K3s3K si"na&+re. The Or$er /as serve$ /i&h no C9> a& all. B
    l
    C
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    13/163 TOC:2
    /igure B0 Invali$ -er&i'i,a&e o' )ervi,e in Wright v Bank of America 210!,v!017634, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&,
    Cor&hern Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia. The re,or$ is +nsi"ne$.
    2nder #a#er administration of t,e courts! t,e /.ntered0 stam#! inscribed on records by t,e )ler of
    t,e )ourt +it, a +et! ,and signatures obviously +as a visible #art of t,e #ublic #a#er records3 %nd
    lie+ise! t,e )ertificates of Service! +,ic, +ere ,and-signed by t,e )ler of t,e )ourt +ere #art of
    t,e #a#er #ublic records3
    2nder electronic administration of t,e courts! as im#lemented in P%).1 and )56.)7! t,at is no
    longer t,e case3
    ;f note! t,e )alifornia 1egulations :California Code of *egulations! 9itle -! Div 7! ),a#ter 18)
    reIuire t,at any digital signatures t,at re#laced /+et0 signatures :,and signatures using in)! +,ic,
    +ere #art of #ublic records! must remain #ublic records in t,eir digital form3
    9o t,e degree t,at t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! and t,e 2S )ourt of
    %##eals! *t, )ircuit! +,ic, conducted t,eir business in t,e cases! outlined belo+! in t,e State of
    )alifornia! t,eir conduct s,ould be deemed in violation of State la+3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    14/163 TOC:2
    Similar regulations! #ertaining to electronic signatures! +ere #romulgated in most of t,e several
    states3
    'n contrast! t,e 2S (2sign Act s,ould be considered inadeIuate! and it ,as never been adeIuately
    #romulgated or enforced3
    >eyond t,e courts! t,e baning industry is also noted for its failure to im#lement valid! #ublicly
    visible electronic signatures3 :for e(am#leG a3 'nvalid signatures on t,e &1ecreated Detter& in case of
    Borroer !ianne "ill! section )-d! and b3 &1obo-signatures&! one of t,e ty#ical features of baning
    fraud in todayEs &7oreclosure 7raud .#idemic&3 B
    li
    C)3 9,e failure to #romulgate! im#lement! and
    enforce under federal la+ electronic signatures in baning and t,e courts! s,ould be deemed ey
    factor in t,e current socio-economic crisis in t,e 2S3
    ;f note! in various re#orts! related to no+ Su#reme )ourt Justice Sotomayor! relative to ,er conduct
    as a )ircuit Judge of t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! -nd )ircuit! t,e =e+ ?or 9imes distinguis,es
    bet+een &signed& and &unsigned& decisions3 B
    lii
    C 't remains unclear! +,at validity t,e =e+ ?or
    9imes legal analysts attribute to &unsigned& decisions! or t,e #ractice of t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals!
    -nd )ircuit! of issuing t+o ty#es of orders and 4udgments - signed! and unsigned3
    9,e =e+ ?or 9imes! lie+ise! distinguis,es bet+een signed and unsigned decisions of t,e 2S
    Su#reme )ourt3 B
    liii
    C
    >eyond unsigned decisions! are anonymous decisions! +,ose aut,or remain unno+n3 Hii#edia!
    +,ic, s,ould be deemed a government organ! e(#lains t,e #ractice as follo+sG B
    liv
    C
    The opinion o' &he -o+r& is +s+all* si"ne$ .* &he a+&hor5 o,,asionall*, &he )+pre%e -o+r& %a*
    iss+e an +nsi"ne$ opinion per curiam.
    9,e #ractice! a##arently gro+ing in freIuency in recent years! +,ere t,e courts of a##eals and t,e
    Su#reme )ourt issue unsigned anonymous decisions! is seen Iuestionable by bot, media and legal
    sc,olars3 ;f interest is t,e fact t,at t,e issue +as again raised in one of t,e most im#ortant and
    controversial cases of recent decades - Citi,ens United :see also section )-m!n)3
    'n -81-! t,e =e+ ?or 9imes +rote in t,is matterG B
    lv
    C
    Cine &i%es so 'ar &his *ear, &he ,o+r& has iss+e$ an +nsi"ne$ opinion r+lin" on &he %eri&s o' a
    $isp+&e /i&ho+& '+ll .rie'in" or oral ar"+%en&. )+,h r+lin"s have .een &he s+.je,& o' ,ri&i,is% 'ro%
    pra,&i&ioners an$ &he le"al a,a$e%*. These ,ri&i,s sa* i& is a %is&ake &o resolve ,ases /i&ho+&
    a$e0+a&e in'or%a&ion an$ $eli.era&ion. I& is also pro.le%a&i,, &he* a$$, &o $o so anon*%o+sl*.
    't s,ould be noted! t,at in all cases! revie+ed by t,is +riter :and none +as e(#licitly stated per
    curiam)! decisions of t,e courts of a##eals and t,e Su#reme )ourt +ere served unsigned and
    unaut,enticated3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    15/163 TOC:2
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    16/163 TOC:2
    /igure 90 J+ne 67, 600I, +nsi"ne$, +na+&hen&i,a&e$ $e,ision $en*in" &he pe&i&ion Zernik v US
    District ourt! entral District of alifornia 20I!767144, in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, A&h -ir,+i&, as $o,ke&e$ in
    &he ori"ina&in" ,ase in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia ! Zernik v onnor et al 2see se,&ion
    -6'4. The () -o+r& o' Appeals, A&h -ir,+i&, /as like/ise serve$ on &he Pe&i&iner +nsi"ne$ an$
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    17/163 TOC:2
    +na+&hen&i,a&e$. The pe&i&ion, KTo -o%pel >e$eral D+e Pro,ess <i"h&sK, aske$ &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, A&h
    -ir,+i&, &o or$er &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, &o iss+e vali$ s+%%onses, in a ,ase
    /here &he Dis&ri,& -o+r& re'+se$ &o $o so 2see also se,&ions -1h, -3'4.
    I& sho+l$ .e no&e$ &ha& &he s&a%p o' &he -lerk () -o+r& o' Appeals, A&h -ir,+i&, s&a&es onl* K>ile$K 2an$ no&
    K9n&ere$K4, as is &he ro+&ine in &ha& -o+r&. @oreover, &he s&a%p is no& si"ne$. Fike/ise, &he s&a%p o' &he
    Dep+&* -lerk o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, /hi,h is si"ne$, onl* s&a&es K<e,eive$K, an$ no& K>ile$K, or K9n&ere$K.
    >or ,o%parison, see papers, /hi,h /ere $enie$ 'ilin" in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, in
    Zernik v onnor et al. 2se,&ion -6'4. )+,h papers /ere s&a%pe$ K<e,eive$ B+& Co& >ile$K.
    'n revie+ing some suc, decisions! one cannot esca#e t,e conclusion t,at at times! t,e #ractice of
    issuing unsigned decisions is em#loyed! +,en t,e 4udges or 4ustices rule in a manner t,at ,as no
    basis in t,e la+ of t,e 2nited States3
    7or e(am#le! in %erni& v US !istrict Court) Central !istrict of California :8$-7-714)) t,e 2S )ourt
    of %##eals! *t, )ircuit summarily denied an .mergency Petition for )om#elling 7ederal Due
    Process 1ig,ts3 9,e Petition ased t,e )ircuit )ourt to order t,e 2S District )ourt to issue valid
    summonses in %erni& v Connor et al :-G8$-cv-81558) :see also section )-f)3 B
    lvi
    C
    9,e decision of t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals +as received unsigned! uncertified! unaut,enticated :+it,
    no =D% - t,e eIuivalent of =.7 in t,e 2S courts of a##eals) :see also section )1d)3
    Is it li&ely that the failure to implement valid electronic signatures in $AC(* and C'/(CF is
    a human error3
    9,e notion t,at a national #ro4ect for transforming t,e administration of t,e courts from #a#er to
    electronic administration failed to im#lement valid! #ublicly visible electronic signatures cannot be
    reasonably deemed an oversig,t! or ,uman error3
    't s,ould also be noted t,at t,e courts of t,e State of 'srael! +,ic, originate in t,e .nglis, common
    la+ as +ell! im#lemented over t,e #ast decade '9 systems! similar to t,ose in t,e 2S! +it, no
    #ublicly visible electronic signatures3 :see also section @) B
    lvii
    C
    d) %nvalid implementation of authentication and service procedures B
    lviii
    C
    =otice of .lectronic 7iling B&=.7&C in t,e 2S district courts! and =otice of Docet %ctivity
    B&=D%&C in t,e 2S courts of a##eals are #art of t,e system establis,ed by t,e %dministrative ;ffice
    of t,e 2S )ourts t,roug, t,e dual doceting and access systems of P%).1 O )56.)73
    N(F in the US district courts
    9,e =.7 #ur#ortedly #rovides t,e aut,entication of t,e service of an electronically-filed #leading
    or ot,er filing by #arties! or of electronic filing and service of orders and 4udgments of t,e courts
    u#on )56.)7 #artici#ating attorneys in t,e case3 9,e =.7 re#laced t,e traditional! #a#er
    )ertificate of Service! or Proof of Service! as +ell as t,e =otice of .ntry of Judgment3 9,erefore!
    t,e =.7 is of critical significance relative to t,e validity! force and effect of 4udicial minutes! orders
    and 4udgments3
    'n t,e =.7 and =D%! an automatically generated! digitally encry#ted! al#,anumeric &c,ecsum&
    string! #ur#ortedly is t,e eIuivalent of t,e +et ,and-signatures of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt in t,e
    traditional )ertificate of Service3
    %s discussed and documented belo+! t,e =.7 is an invalid aut,entication and service instrument as
    to form3
    5oreover! as documented in instant submission! t,e manner of its im#lementation in )56.)7
    o#ened t,e +ay for large-scale fraud! t,roug, t,e issuance of invalid =.7s! missing t,e &.lectronic
    Document Stam#&! or no =.7 at all! in order to generate simulated court records3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    18/163 TOC:2
    N(Fs e4plained in figures
    7igures 18-16 #rovide instructive e(am#les and te(t! demonstrating t,e manner of abuse! in,erent
    in t,e #ractices of t,e 2S district courts! relative to t,e =.7s3
    /igure 100 Invali$ &ra$i&ional, paper -er&i'i,a&e o' )ervi,e .* &he -lerk o' &he -o+r& in Wright v Bank of
    America 210!,v!017634, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Cor&hern Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia. The re,or$ in,l+$e$ a ,er&i'i,a&ion
    s&a&e%en&, :I ,er&i'*O;, as /ell as &he na%e an$ a+&hori&* o' &he in$ivi$+al exe,+&in" &he ,er&i'i,a&ion.
    =o/ever, &he $o,+%en& sho/n here is %issin" &he han$ si"na&+re o' &he Dep+&* -lerk.
    The ,er&i'i,a&ion re,or$s /ere an essen&ial par& o' &he p+.li, re,or$s in &he paper ,o+r& 'iles. In ,on&ras&,
    &o$a* &he C9>s are hi$$en 'ro% &he p+.li, an even 'ro% pro se par&ies in &heir o/n li&i"a&ion. 2se,&ion B6a4
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    19/163 TOC:2
    /igure 110 C9> in,l+$in" an Kele,&roni, $o,+%en& s&a%pK ! an en,r*p&e$ alphan+%eri, K,he,ks+%K s&rin"
    2in re$ re,&an"les4, Dk& P6, -o%plain& in Perry v Premier "ortgage #unding $nc et al 26804!,v!4174, ()
    Dis&ri,& -o+r&, 9as&ern Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia.
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    20/163 TOC:2
    /igure 120 Nali$ C9>, .earin" a ,o%ple&e K9le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK, Dk& P1, Pe&i&ion, in Richard #ine v
    Sheriff of %os Angeles ounty 2680A!,v!01A144, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia 2see also
    se,&ion -3a4
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    21/163 TOC:2
    /igure 1=0 Invali$ C9>, %issin" &he K9le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK, Dk& P7A, "andate of
    the US ourt of Appeals! &th ircuit! re' ertificate of Appeala(ility, in Richard #ine v Sheriff of %os Angeles
    ounty 2680A!,iv!01A144, as $o,ke&e$ in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia 2see also se,&ion
    -3a4. C+%ero+s, si%ilar, invali$ C9>s, %issin" &he K9le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK /ere $is,overe$ in o&her
    () $is&ri,& ,o+r&s.
    The $e&aile$ $o,+%en&a&ion o' &he ,ases, rela&e$ &o &he =a.eas -orp+s a,&ions o' <i,har$ >ine in &he ()
    ,o+r&s provi$e +ni0+e $e%ons&ra&ion o' &he a.+se inheren& in &he $esi"n an$ opera&ion o' PA-9< an$
    -@39->8
    1. A si%+la&e$ =a.eas -orp+s revie/ /as ,on$+,&e$ in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia,
    /here j+$i,ial re,or$s /ere 'ile$ /i&h C9>s %issin" &he K9le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK. In s+,h invali$,
    si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion, @a"is&ra&e -arla #oehrle an$ J+$"e John #arner iss+e$ a.+sive j+$i,ial re,or$s, /hi,h
    $i$ no& ,o%pl* /i&h &he () -ons&i&+&ion an$ &he () la/ an$ +nla/'+ll* $eprive$ &he Fi.er&* o' <i,har$ >ine.
    6. #hen >ine 'ile$ his a,&ions in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, A&h -ir,+i&, &aken 'ro% s+,h si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion
    re,or$s in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, &he () -o+r& o' Appeals respon$e$ .* ,on$+,&in" a si%+la&e$ revie/ as
    /ell, an$ .* iss+in" si%+la&e$ or$ers an$ %an$a&es, ,oll+$in" in a.+se o' ri"h&s.
    3. #hen &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r& re,eive$ s+,h si%+la&e$ %an$a&es 'ro% &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, &he ()
    Dis&ri,& -o+r& $o,ke&e$ &he% as invali$, si%+la&e$ j+$i,ial re,or$s as /ell.
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    22/163 TOC:2
    /igure 140 Invali$ C9>, Dk& P33?, Or$er, in Huminski v Rutland Police Dept et al 218AA!
    ,v!001?04 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Ner%on&, a -ivil <i"h&s %a&&er. D
    lix
    E The C9> is invali$, sin,e i& in,l+$es no
    K9le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK. I& also in,l+$es no link &o a re,or$, an$ no %ailin" or e%ailin" lis&.
    The C9> sho/n here per&ains &o a K&ex& onl* or$erK ! &ex& &ha& is en&ere$ in &he PA-9< $o,ke& /i&h no
    a&&a,he$ $o,+%en&. )+,h or$ers or %in+&es ,anno& possi.l* .e a+&hen&i,a&e$ &hro+"h an K9le,&roni,
    Do,+%en& )&a%pK, a ,he,ks+% s&rin" ! sin,e &here is no $o,+%en& &o ,al,+la&e &he ,he,ks+% s&rin" on. The
    si%+la&e$ $e,ision here is no& o' hi"h si"ni'i,an,e in &he =+%inski ,ase. I& is provi$e$ here &o sho/ &he la,k
    o' vali$i&* o' s+,h K&ex& onl* or$ers3%in+&esK, /hi,h are ,o%%on in o&her ,ases o+&line$ in ins&an&
    s+.%ission, e."., S) v BA 2se,&ion -3h4 an$ "aid of the "ist v Windsor 2se,&ion -3j4, /here a,,ess &o
    &he C9>s /as $enie$. )ee 'i"+re .elo/ 'or a K&ex& onl* -lerkLs -er&i'i,a&eK in "aid of the "ist v Windsor.
    /igure 120 Invali$ PA-9< $o,ke& no&a&ion, Dk& Pnone, -er&i'i,a&e o' @ailin" .* &he -lerk
    o' &he -o+r&, in "aid of the "ist v Windsor! in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Cor&hern Dis&ri,& o' Beor"ia 2se,&ion -3j4.
    The PA-9< $o,ke& no&a&ion /as assi"ne$ no $o,ke& n+%.er, an$ no link &o a re,or$ /as provi$e$. There
    ,o+l$ no& .e a re,or$s linke$ &o &his $o,ke& &ex&, an$ &here'ore, &he no K,he,ks+% s&rin"K ,o+l$ .e ,al,+la&e$,
    an$ no vali$ C9> ,o+l$ .e iss+e$ on &his $o,ke& &ex&. There'ore, &he K-lerkLs -er&i'i,a&e o' @ailin"K in
    re'eren,e ,o+l$ no& possi.l* .e $ee%e$ en&ere$, even i' &he servi,e o' Dk& P3?A, O$er /as in 'a,& exe,+&e$.
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    23/163 TOC:2
    /igure 1@0 Invali$ KTex& onl*K $o,ke& en&r*, Dk& Pnone, Do,+%en& $ele&ion an$ re!$o,ke&in" in $n R)' Ronald
    *ottschalk 26811!%,!006I44 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia. The &ex& re!a''ir%s &ha& &he
    Jan+ar* 11, 6016 Or$er o' Dis.ar%en&3)+spension 2$isposi&ive or$er, akin &o j+$"%en& in s+,h ,ase4 /as
    iss+e$ /i&h no C9>, an$ &here'ore /as +na+&hen&i,a&e$, an$ o' no 'or,e an$ e''e,&.
    =o/ever, i& sho+l$ .e no&e$ &ha& &his no&e is a KTex& onl*K $o,ke& en&r* .* a person o' +nkno/n na%e an$
    a+&hori&*, /hi,h is +nsi"ne$ an$ +na+&hen&i,a&e$.
    <onal$ Bo&&s,halk /as a Fos An"eles A&&orne*, /ho like <i,har$ >ine pro&es&e$ j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion. Fike
    <i,har$ >ine he /as 'alsel* arres&e$ in 600A 2al.ei& 'or a 'e/ /eeks onl*4, an$ like <i,har$ >ine he also /as
    'alsel* hospi&alize$. =o/ever, /hereas <i,har$ >ine /as kep& in soli&ar* ,on'ine%en& 'or 1I %on&hs in &he
    hospi&al se,&ion o' &he jail, Bo&&s,halk /as kep& in an o+&si$e ps*,hia&ri, /ar$. =e repor&e$ &ha& he /as
    'or,e$ &o &ake ps*,hia&ri, %e$i,a&ions, /hile .ein" $enie$ ,ri&i,al $ia.e&es %e$i,a&ion.
    Thro+"h ,o%%+ni,a&ion /i&h &he a+&hor o' ins&an& s+.%ission, Bo&&s,halk /as e$+,a&e$ re"ar$in" &he
    si"ni'i,an,e o' &he C9> an$ i&s K9le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK. There'ore, /hen he re,eive$ &he $isposi&ive
    or$er in &his ,ase /i&h an invali$ C9>, he 'ile$ a re0+es& &o $ele&e i& 'ro% &he $o,ke&. -hie' J+$"e A+$re*
    -ollins apparen&l* ,onsen&e$. D
    lx
    E
    The ,on$+,& o' -hie' J+$"e A+$re* -ollins here s&an$s in ,on&ras& /i&h &he re'+sal o' -hie' J+$"e A+$re*
    -ollins an$ -lerk o' &he -o+r& Terr* Ca'isi &o &ake an* ,orre,&ive a,&ions, /hen &he* /ere no&i'ie$ o' &he
    $is,over* o' &he invali$ C9>s in #ine v Sheriff an$ Zernik v onnor et al 2see se,&ion B6a4. The reason %a*
    .e &ha& here, onl* one or$er ha$ &o .e re!$o,ke&e$. In &he &/o 'or%er ,ases, &he en&ire $o,ke& /o+l$ have &o
    .e $ele&e$.
    I& is ins&r+,&ive &ha& .o&h >ine an$ Bo&&s,halk, senior, experien,e$ a&&orne*s, /ho /ere a+&horize$ -@39->
    par&i,ipan&s an$ passe$ &he %an$a&or* ins&r+,&ion, /ere en&irel* +na/are o' &he si"ni'i,an,e o' &he C9> an$
    &he K9le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK 'or vali$i&*, 'or,e an$ e''e,& o' j+$i,ial re,or$s.
    Sources of information re5 N(F
    'n,erent to t,e invalidity of t,e =.7! t,ere is no single source t,at clearly defines t,e =.7 as an
    aut,entication instrument3 9,e information belo+ is #rimarily derived from t,e General -rder 8$-
    8- in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! and various 2sers 5anual of t,e district
    and a##eals courts3 %s discussed above :section )1a) suc, sources ,ave no aut,ority! relative to
    suc, fundamental c,anges in t,e Federal *ules of Civil $rocedure3
    &2nofficial& %nderson 5anual :1ev 87! -88$) for electronic filing of t,e 2S District )ourt!
    )entral District of )alifornia
    9,e &2nofficial& %nderson 5anual :1ev 87! -88$) for electronic filing in t,e 2S District )ourt!
    )entral District of )alifornia! #rovides t,e follo+ing vague and ambiguous e(#lanationG :# 13)
    B
    l(i
    C
    &0 )he N!ti'e !( ,le'tr!ni' /iling
    The s*s&e% /ill presen& *o+ /i&h a Co&i,e o' 9le,&roni, >ilin" 2:C9>;4 s,reen an$ /ill also e!%ail *o+ a
    ,op* o' &he C9>. The Co&i,e o' 9le,&roni, >ilin" 2:C9>;4 is *o+r proo' &ha& &he $o,+%en& has .een 9!
    >ile$. Ho+ sho+l$ prin& &he s,reen &o a pie,e o' paper or a PD> 2or .o&h4 .e'ore pro,ee$in", .e,a+se
    *o+ /ill nee$ &o a&&a,h &he C9> as &he las& pa"e o' &he ,o+r&es* ,op* &ha& *o+ s+.%i& &o &he -o+r&. The
    C9> in,l+$es a :$o,+%en& n+%.er; an$ a link. Be s+re &o no&e &ha& $o,+%en& n+%.er, as *o+ /ill
    nee$ i& i' *o+ nee$ &o e!%ail a propose$ or$er &o &he -o+r&. The C9> also in,l+$es an :9le,&roni,
    Do,+%en& )&a%p; /hi,h is a s&rin" o' le&&ers an$ n+%.ers /hi,h -o+r& s&a'' ,an +se &o veri'* &he
    a+&hen&i,i&* o' &he C9>. The C9> also ,on&ains &he pa&h an$ 'ile na%e o' &he $o,+%en& *o+ +ploa$e$
    an$ an* a&&a,h%en&s.
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    24/163 TOC:2
    't s,ould be noted t,at t,e &2nofficial& %nderson 5anual! +,ic, includes #lenty of figures! fails
    to s,o+ an image of a valid =.7! including t,e &.lectronic Document Stam#&3 9,at! in a court
    t,at routinely issued simulated minutes! orders! and 4udgments +it, no &.lectronic Document
    Stam#&3
    %dministrative Policies and Procedures for .lectronic 7iling of t,e 2S District )ourt for t,e
    Hestern District of 9e(as
    % more s#ecific descri#tion of t,e =.7 as t,e aut,entication instrument in )56.)7 a##ears in
    t,e 2S District )ourt for t,e Hestern District of 9e(as %dministrative Policies and Procedures
    for .lectronic 7iling3 B
    l(ii
    C 9,e te(t in t,is document! regardless of its ambiguous aut,ority!
    clearly states t,at t,e =.7 constitutes &filing& and &entr&! and &Notice of Entr of -u&gment&
    #ursuant to t,e Federal *ules of Civil $rocedure.
    2pa"e 74
    Se'ti!n 2: ?e(initi!n an" Relate" Re:uirement:
    h. Co&i,e o' 9le,&roni, >ilin" 2:C9>;4 is an ele,&roni, no&i,e a+&o%a&i,all* "enera&e$ .* &he 9le,&roni,
    >ilin" )*s&e% a& &he &i%e a $o,+%en& is $o,ke&e$. The C9> in,l+$es &he &i%e o' 'ilin" an$ $o,ke&in",
    &he na%e o' &he par&* an$ >ilin" (ser 'ilin" &he $o,+%en&, &he &*pe o' $o,+%en&, &he &ex& o' &he $o,ke&
    en&r*, &he na%e o' &he par&* an$ >ilin" (ser re,eivin" &he no&i,e. I' a $o,+%en& is a&&a,he$ &o &he
    $o,ke& en&r*, &he C9> /illz ,on&ain a =*perlink &o &he 'ile$ $o,+%en& allo/in" re,ipien&s &o re&rieve &he
    $o,+%en&.
    2pa"e 114
    Se'ti!n A: .!ne:uen'e !( ,le'tr!ni' /iling
    a. 9le,&roni, &rans%ission o' a $o,+%en& &hro+"h &he 9le,&roni, >ilin" )*s&e% ,ons&i&+&es &he 'ilin" o'
    &he $o,+%en& p+rs+an& &o <+le 72e4, >9D9<AF <(F9) O> -INIF P<O-9D(<9, an$ <+le 4A,
    >9D9<AF <(F9) O> -<I@ICAF P<O-9D(<9.
    .. The &rans%ission o' a C9> ,ons&i&+&es en&r* on &he $o,ke& p+rs+an& &o <+les 7I an$ 7A, >9D9<AF
    <(F9) O> -INIF P<O-9D(<9, an$ <+les 4A an$ 77, >9D9<AF <(F9) O> -<I@ICAF
    P<O-9D(<9.
    Se'ti!n 1@: N!ti'e !( .!urt Or"er an" Cu"gment
    a. I%%e$ia&el* +pon en&r* o' an or$er or j+$"%en&, &he -lerk /ill &rans%i& a C9> &o >ilin" (sers.
    Trans%ission o' &he C9> ,ons&i&+&es &he no&i,e re0+ire$ .* <+le 772$4, >9D9<AF <(F9) O> -INIF
    P<O-9D(<9, an$ <+le 4A2,4, >9D9<AF <(F9) O> -<I@ICAF P<O-9D(<9. The -lerk /ill sen$
    paper ,opies o' or$ers an$ j+$"%en&s &o non!>ilin" (sers.
    Ao+ever! it s,ould be noted t,at t,e te(t from t,e 2S District )ourt! Hestern District of 9e(as!
    entirely fails to mention t,e &.lectronic Document Stam#&! +,ic, #ur#ortedly re#laced t,e
    signature of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt! and +,ic, #ur#ortedly e(ecutes t,e =.7 as an aut,entication
    and certification record3
    General -rder 8$-8- of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia
    9,e General -rder 8$-8- of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia #rovides
    additional information! #ertaining to t,e significance of t,e &.lectronic Document Stam#& in t,e
    #rocess of entryG B
    l(iii
    C :#age 17)
    %D0 ,le'tr!ni' /iling0
    ...
    O0 .erti(i'ati!n !( ,le'tr!ni' ?!'ument0 P+rs+an& &o >e$eral <+les o' -ivil Pro,e$+re 442a4214 an$
    442,4, &he %e&ho$ o' ele,&roni, ,er&i'i,a&ion $es,ri.e$ herein is $ee%e$ proo' o' an o''i,ial ,o+r& re,or$
    %ain&aine$ .* &he -lerk o' -o+r&. The C9> ,on&ains &he $a&e o' ele,&roni, $is&ri.+&ion an$ i$en&i'i,a&ion
    o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es Dis&ri,& -o+r& 'or &he -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia as &he sen$er. An en,r*p&e$
    veri'i,a&ion ,o$e appears in &he ele,&roni, $o,+%en& s&a%p se,&ion o' &he C9>. The ele,&roni,
    $o,+%en& s&a%p shall .e +se$ 'or &he p+rpose o' ,on'ir%in" &he a+&hen&i,i&* o' &he &rans%ission an$
    asso,ia&e$ $o,+%en&2s4 /i&h &he -lerk o' -o+r&, as ne,essar*. #hen a $o,+%en& has .een
    ele,&roni,all* 'ile$ in&o -@39->, &he o''i,ial re,or$ is &he ele,&roni, re,or$in" o' &he $o,+%en& kep& in
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    25/163 TOC:2
    &he ,+s&o$* o' &he -lerk o' -o+r&. The C9> provi$es ,er&i'i,a&ion &ha& &he asso,ia&e$ $o,+%en&2s4 is a
    &r+e an$ ,orre,& ,op* o' &he ori"inal 'ile$ /i&h &he ,o+r&.
    't s,ould be noted t,at t,e language used ,ere is vague and ambiguous! if not #atently false3 't
    refers to & #roof of an official court record maintained by t,e )ler of )ourt&! instead of referring
    to &7iling&! &.ntry&! and &=otice of .ntry of Judgment&3 't refers to t,e =.7 as &certification
    t,at t,e associated document:s) is a true and correct co#y of t,e original filed +it, t,e court&3
    )56.)7 2ser @uide of t,e 2S District )ourt! =ort,ern District of 'llinois
    9,e 2ser @uide of t,e 2S District )ourt! =ort,ern District of 'llinois! #rovides additional
    critical information regarding t,e &.lectronic Document Stam#&G 't describes t,e &Document
    Kerification 2tility& and its use3 9,roug, t,e descri#tion in t,is @uide! it becomes evident t,at
    t,e &.lectronic Document Stam#& is not a #ersonal electronic signature! but a &c,ecsum& string!
    +,ic, s,o+s t,e eIuivalency of t+o records! #rovided t,at one ,as access to t,e &Document
    Kerification 2tility& 3
    Ao+ever! t,e language of t,e &2nofficial %nderson 5anual& and t,e General -rder 8$-8-
    suggests t,at t,e 2tility is =;9 accessible to )56.)7 users in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral
    District of )alifornia3 Surely it is inaccessible to t,e #ublic at large3
    /igure 1A0 Do,+%en& Neri'i,a&ion (&ili&* as $es,ri.e$ in &he -@39-> (ser B+i$e o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&,
    Cor&hern Dis&ri,& o' Illinois.D
    lxiv
    E Des,rip&ion o' &he +&ili&* /as no& 'o+n$ in an* o' &he o&her $is&ri,& ,o+r&sL (sers
    @an+al /hi,h /ere inspe,&e$. The (&ili&* ena.les a+&horize$ person &o $e&er%ine, i' a ,o+r& re,or$ /as
    a$+l&era&e$. The p+.li, an$ pro+se par&ies are $enie$ a,,ess &o &he (&ili&*, an$ are also $enie$ a,,ess &o &he
    9le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%p, /hi,h is +se$ in &he (&ili&*.
    %lt,oug, t,e information above is derived from dis#arate 2S courts! it can be assumed to be
    universally a##licable! since t,e basic #latforms of P%).1 and )56.)7 are universally
    im#lemented in all 2S courts3
    Invalidity of the N(F as an authentication instrument as to form
    9,e 2S district and a##eals courts today #ur#ort t,at t,e =.7 :or =D% in t,e 2S courts of a##eals)
    constitute t,e aut,entication and certification instrument of court records3 Ao+ever! t,e =.7 is
    invalid as an aut,entication instrument on its faceG
    9,e o#ening statement on t,e =.7 saysG
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    26/163 TOC:2
    This is an a+&o%a&i, e!%ail %essa"e "enera&e$ .* &he -@39-> s*s&e%.
    % true! valid aut,entication record s,ould be sent by an aut,ori"ed #erson in t,e ;ffice of t,e
    )ler3
    9,e =.7 fails to state t,e name and aut,ority of an individual! issuing t,e =.7 as a De#uty
    )ler of t,e )ourt3
    9,e =.7 fails to include t,e certification statement &'! t,e undersigned! ,ereby certify333&
    9,e =.7 bears no valid signature! eit,er gra#,ic or digital3 'nstead! it includes a mac,ine
    generated encry#ted &c,ecsum& string3
    9,e =.7 is not sent and delivered as a an accom#anying record to t,e actual minutes! orders! or
    4udgments! +,ic, it #ur#orts to aut,enticate3 9,e relations,i# bet+een t,e =.7 :or =D%) and
    t,e res#ective court record is only t,roug, t,e ,y#erlin! #rovided in t,e =.73 Ay#erlins are
    insecure and invalid a##lication for t,is #ur#ose! as clearly documented in t,e =D% of S,elley
    belo+3 'n fact! many courts #ro,ibit t,e use of ,y#erlins in any court filings3
    9,e =.7 fails to conform +it, t,e la+ of t,e 2nited States! relative to t,e issuance of orders and
    4udgments under t,e signatures and seal of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt3 Detailed discussion of t,e
    relevant la+s is #rovided in section .5!6! belo+3
    9,e =.7s! are concealed from #ublic access! and even from pro se #arties in t,eir o+n litigation
    :see section @1a)3 9,erefore! t,e #ublic at large and pro se #arties in #articular are unable to
    distinguis, valid and effectual records from void! not voidable records! +,ile bot, valid and void
    records are #ublis,ed by t,e courts in t,e P%).1 docets3
    .he N(F is central to undermining the integrity of US court records
    9,e sources! co#ied above! #ur#ort t,at today t,e =.7 is t,e definitive record! +,ic, aut,enticates
    t,e entry of minutes! orders! and 4udgments of t,e 2S courts3
    9,e listing of suc, minutes! orders! and 4udgments in t,e P%).1 docets! in itself! is not
    necessarily indicative of entry of suc, 4udicial records as valid and effectual records of t,e 2S
    district courts3
    Due to t,e failure to establis, t,e =.7 in a valid and aut,oritative manner! o##ortunities +ere
    created for deceiving t,e #ublic and #arties in litigation! relative to t,e validity and effect of 2S
    courts litigation records3
    %s s,o+n in instant submission in numerous cases! t,e =.7 is ey to mani#ulations t,at result in
    t,e #resentation of invalid records as valid and effectual records of t,e 2S courtsG
    'ssuance of =.7s by unaut,ori"ed #ersonnel3
    'ssuance of =.7s! +,ic, are missing t,e &.lectronic Document Stam#&! and t,erefore are
    deemed invalid by t,e 2S courts t,emselves3
    'ssuance of =.7s! +,ic, bear truncated! invalid &.lectronic Document Stam#&3
    1ecording of &te(t only orders& or minutes in t,e docet! #ur#orting t,e entry of records! +it, no
    corres#onding record and no #ossible issuance of a valid =.73
    (fforts to access N(Fs
    .(am#les ,ave been recorded in various 2S courts of minutes! orders! and 4udgments! +,ic, +ere
    #ublis,ed in t,e P%).1 docets! but +ere not aut,enticated as entered t,roug, t,e issuance of a
    valid =.7 bearing an &.lectronic Document Stam#& :see above figures! and also Fine v Sheriff 2
    section 3-a! %erni& v Connor - section )-f! and corres#ondence +it, t,e )ler of t,e )ourt
    regarding t,e validity of docets and records in t,e latter t+o cases in section @-a)3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    27/163 TOC:2
    Per,a#s t,e best evidence for t,e fraudulent nature of t,e t,e =.7s bot, in t,e manner of t,eir
    im#lementation and t,e manner of t,eir use! comes from Dr FerniEs corres#ondence +it, )ler of
    t,e 2S )ourt 9erry =afisi in t,is matter :see section @-a)3 9,e corres#ondence #ertained to t,e
    denial of access to =.7 records and refusal of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt 9erry =afisi to ans+er on
    validity and integrity of t,e docet and records in t,e cases of Fine v Sheriff :see section )3a) and
    %erni& v Connor et al :see section )3f) in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia3
    Aars, retaliation against Dr Ferni follo+ed ,is re#eat attem#ts to access t,e =.7 records of t,e
    2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! and documenting t,e fraud in t,e records of t,e
    latter t+o court files3
    N!As in the US courts of appeals
    9,e fallacy in im#lementation of P%).1 and )56.)7 in t,e courts of a##eals in general! and t,e
    =D%s in #articular! is described in furt,er details in t+o #a#ers in t,e form of 1eIuests for .(#ert
    ;#inion3 B
    l(v
    C
    'nformation regarding t,e #ractices of t,e 2S courts of a##eals! regarding t,e issuance of =D%
    :=otice of Docet %ctivity) in lieu of aut,entication by t,e cler of t,e court! +as derived from
    revie+ of Docal 1ules! @eneral ;rders! and 2sers 5anuals! B
    l(vi
    C and revie+ of t,e actual #ractices
    in numerous cases3
    5ore detailed revie+ of t,e =D% of t,e 2S courts of a##eals is #rovided in t,e form of a 1eIuest
    for ;#inion3 B
    l(vii
    C
    9,e general #ractices! invalidity! and fallacy of t,e =D% as an aut,entication instrument in t,e 2S
    courts of a##eals are similar to t,e c,aracteristics of t,e =.7 in t,e 2S district courts3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    28/163 TOC:2
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    29/163 TOC:2
    /igure 1B0 Invali$ CDA 2Co&i,e o' Do,ke& A,&ivi&*4. The CDA ,orrespon$s &o @an$a&e in
    Richard #ine v Sheriff of %os Angeles ounty et al 20A!7?0734 in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, A&h -ir,+i&. The
    CDAs /ere $is,overe$ a'&er repea& 0+es&s &o &he -o+r&s. The CDA, per&ainin" &o &he @an$a&e Or$er, $en*in"
    &he 9%er"en,* Pe&i&ion 'ro% =a.eas -orp+s in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia.
    >ine, &he 70!*ear ol$, 'or%er () prose,+&or, /as an an&i!j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion a,&ivis&. >ine expose$ an$
    re.+ke$ &he &akin" .* -ali'ornia j+$"es o' Kno& per%i&&e$ pa*%en&sK 2,alle$ .* %e$ia K.ri.esK4. >ollo/in" his
    expos+re &he -ali'ornia Bovernor si"ne$ K<e&roa,&ive I%%+ni&iesK 2,alle$ .* %e$ia Kpar$onsK4 'or all s+,h
    j+$"es. T/o /eeks la&er, >ine /as arres&e$ an$ i%prisone$ .* )heri'' Fee Ba,a o' Fos An"eles -o+n&*
    +n$er .ookin" re,or$s, /hi,h lis&e$ >ine as arres&e$ on lo,a&ion an$ .* a+&hori&* o' &he non!exis&in"
    K@+ni,ipal -o+r& o' )an Pe$roK 2see also se,&ion -3a4.
    The CDA /as no& serve$ /i&h &he @an$a&e on >ine, &hen i%prisone$. The @an$a&e /as serve$ on >ine
    +nsi"ne$, +n,er&i'ie$, an$ +na+&hen&i,a&e$. The CDA /as $is,overe$ la&er, as par& o' e''or&s .* &his a+&hor,
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    30/163 TOC:2
    a& si"ni'i,an& personal risk 2see also se,&ion Ba,.4 , &o re&rieve &he re,or$s o' &he vario+s >ine ,o+r&s ,ases.
    D
    lxviii
    E
    The CDA sho+l$ .e $ee%e$ 'alse on i&s 'a,e8 I& 'ails &o .ear a $o,ke& n+%.er, 'or &he re,or$ i& p+rpor&s &o
    a+&hen&i,a&e, ins&ea$ i& onl* lis&s KDo,+%en&2s4K, i& also sho/s onl* a &r+n,a&e$ K9le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK.
    The CDA, like i&s ,o+n&erpar& in &he () $is&ri,& ,o+r&s, &he C9>, sho+l$ .e invali$ as &o 'or%8 I& 'ails &o in,l+$e
    a ,er&i'i,a&ion s&a&e%en&, an$ i& 'ails &o s&a&e &he na%e an$ a+&hori&* o' &he person, /ho iss+e$ &he CDA. The
    CDA sho+l$ .e $ee%e$ par&i,+larl* invali$ as a ,er&i'i,a&e o' servi,e, sin,e i& s&a&e in &he '+&+re, passive
    voi,e, KCo&i,e /ill .e ele,&roni,all* %aile$ &oK, an$ &hen expli,i&l* s&a&es &ha& pro+se par&ies /ill COT re,eive a
    ,op* o' &he CDA, K-ase par&i,ipan&s lis&e$ .elo/ /ill no& re,eive &his ele,&roni, no&i,eK.
    The 'a,& &ha& &he respe,&ive re,or$, &he @an$a&e Or$er, /as never $ee%e$ a vali$ j+$i,ial re,or$ .* &he ()
    ,o+r&s &he%selves ,an .e also reasone$ 'ro% &he 'a,& &ha& &he @an$a&e Or$er /as $o,ke&e$ in &he ()
    Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, /i&h an invali$ C9> 2see >i"+re A, a.ove4.
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    31/163 TOC:2
    /igure 190 Invali$ CDA 'or Dk& P 7, Or$er Den*in" )&a*, in Shelley v ,uality %oan Service orp. The or$er
    linke$ &o &he F)D /as no& an or$er in &he )hell* appeal, .+& in an +nrela&e$ prisonerLs pe&i&ion8 William
    "eador v - Alvidre.! et al 20A!1?70I4 2Dk& P7 in &ha& ,ase4. #hen )helle* aske$ &he () -o+r& o' Appeals,
    A&h -ir,+i&, &o ,orre,& &he invali$ CDA, his re0+es& /as no& a$$resse$.
    One sho+l$ no&i,e Appellan& )helle*Ls ,lai%s in his Appeal Brie', re"ar$in" $en*in" o' a,,ess &o &he ()
    Dis&ri,& -o+r& in his ,ase.
    The ,on$+,& o' &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, A&h -ir,+i&, ,an .e $ee%e$ as %ore o' &he sa%e.
    The ,ase $e%ons&ra&es &he invali$i&* o' servi,e &hro+"h &he CDA 2an$ like/ise, &he C9> in &he $is&ri,&
    ,o+r&s4, /here &he j+$i,ial re,or$s are no& serve$ a& all, onl* a link is provi$e$. The pra,&i,e o' provi$in" links
    ins&ea$ o' re,or$s is inse,+re, an$ sho+l$ .e prohi.i&e$ in ,o+r& pro,ess. D
    lxix
    E
    'n t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! it a##ears t,at t,e common #ractice! relative to t,e issuance
    of simulated 4udicial records! involves t,e use of a truncated! invalid &.lectronic Document Stam#&!
    instead of t,e entire omission of t,e &.lectronic Document Stam#& from simulated 4udicial records
    in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia3
    %n entirely different ty#e of invalid #ractice of =D% issuance +as found in t,e case of 1ic,ard
    S,elley3 'n Shelley v 6uality Loan Services :8*-56133)! S,elley attem#ted to #rotect ,is rig,ts
    against a financial institution! again in alleged real estate fraud3
    9,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit denied t,e 1eIuest for a Stay in t,e %##eal in t,is case in an
    unsigned order! and t,roug, t,e service of a false and misleading =D%3
    9,e case +as uniIue! since S,elley! a pro2se filer! +as #ermitted access to electronic filing t,roug,
    )56.)73 9,erefore! ,e received by electronic mail t,e =D%s in ,is case3 Ao+ever! t,e ;ctober
    --! -88* ;rder denying ,is a##eal +as received +it, an =D%! including a lin to an order in an
    unrelated ,abeas cor#us #etition3
    9,e case may a##ear as sim#ly ,uman error3 Ao+ever! it a##arently +as not suc,! since t,e 2S
    )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit refused to correct t,e error even after S,elley #ointed it out to t,e
    )ourt3
    9,e case demonstrates t,e invalidity of service t,roug, t,e =D% :and lie+ise! t,e =.7 in t,e
    district courts)! +,ere t,e 4udicial records are not served at all! only a lin is #rovided3 9,e #ractice
    of #roviding lins instead of records is insecure! and s,ould be #ro,ibited in court #rocess3
    Fraud or human error3
    's it #ossible t,at t,e defective design of t,e =.7s and =D%s! as to form! and t,e invalid o#eration
    of =.7s and =D%s! documented in instant submission are 4ust t,e outcome of ,uman errorP
    't is e(tremely unlie to be t,e case for a variety of reasonsG
    9,e large-scale fraud! today #racticed by t,e 2S district and a##eals courts! relative to t,e
    issuance of simulated 4udicial records! is not original at all3 't is a common fraud3 9,e ;ffice of
    t,e )ler of t,e )ourt! and t,e )ler of t,e )ourt as custodian of court records +ere instituted
    s#ecifically to #revent t,is ty#e of fraud ,undreds of years ago3 S#ecific court #rocedures! all of
    +,ic, are ,inged on t,e aut,ority of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt ,ave develo#ed in t,e courts!
    originating from t,e .nglis, common la+ to #revent t,is ty#e of fraud! including but not limited
    toG a) %ut,entication of all 4udicial records by t,e )ler of t,e )ourt! b) %ffi(ing t,e Seal of t,e
    )ourt! +,ic, is maintained under t,e custody of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt! on all court orders and
    4udgments! c) S#ecial #rocedures for t,e commencing and dis#ositive records of litigation - t,e
    issuance of summonses by t,e )ler of t,e )ourt and t,e e(ecution of t,eir service! and t,e
    =otice of .ntry of Judgment3 9,e systems! no+ em#loyed in t,e 2S courts undermined all
    t,ese #rocedures! +,ic, are ey to Due Process! in a coordinated fas,ion3
    't is unt,inable t,at after ,undreds of years of tradition! relative to t,e forms! #ertaining to
    certification of service by t,e cler of t,e court! t,e use of signatures and t,e Seal of t,e )ourt
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    32/163 TOC:2
    +er all lost on senior 4udicial officers! +,o must ,ave been involved in designing of P%).1 and
    )56.)73
    9,e concealment of t,e =.7s from #ublic access and from pro se litigants is entirely im#robable
    as an &error&3 5oreover! t,e certified 4udgments +ere al+ays filed as #art of commencing
    records in an a##eal3 9o t,e degree t,at t,e =.7s are ,eld as aut,entication and certification
    instruments! t,ey s,ould ,ave been filed toget,er +it, t,e 4udgment record in an a##eal3
    Ao+ever! revie+ of t,ousands of a##eal records in P%).1! failed to s,o+ a single case! +,ere
    t,e =.7 +as filed toget,er +it, t,e 4udgment in an a##eal3 5oreover! in cases! suc, as t,e
    a##eal of Fine v Sheriff and Log Ca+in *epu+licans v USA et al :sections )-a!n! belo+)! t,e 2S
    )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! conducted a##eals from 4udgments t,at +ere never aut,enticated
    or certified t,roug, an =.73 %nd +,en t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! +as reliably
    informed of t,at fact! it failed to dismiss t,e a##eal and remand t,e case to t,e 2S District )ourt!
    )entral District of )alifornia3 'n fact! after revie+ of t,ousands of a##eals records in t,e various
    2S courts of a##eals! not a single remand order for lac of certification +as ever discovered in
    P%).13
    9,e entirely ine(#licable discrimination in access to t,e courts! t,roug, t,e denial of access to
    )56.)7 to pro2se filers! cannot #ossibly be deemed a matter of ,uman error! and combined
    +it, t,e common failure to serve t,e =.7s and =D%s! even as #a#er records on pro2se filers! is
    essential for enabling t,e fraud in t,is matter3 5oreover! even +,en a pro2se filer reali"e t,e
    fraud! and attem#ts to gain access to t,e =.7s! +,ic, ,ad not been served on t,em! access is
    denied! as documented in %erni& v Connor and 'aid of the 'ist v #indsor :sections )-f!4)3
    9,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! refused to t,e fraud and abuse of rig,ts in t,e
    im#lementation of General -rder 8$-8- and t,e =.7 in t,e 'otion to Intervene in t,e a##eal in
    Log Ca+in *epu+licans v USA et al in t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit :see section )3n)3
    Die+ise! t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt refused to revie+ t,e same issue in t,e 'otion to Intervene in
    Fine v Sheriff in t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt3 :see section )3a)3
    't s,ould also be noted t,at in t,e transition to electronic records! t,e Su#erior )ourt of
    )alifornia! )ounty of Dos %ngeles! undermined t,e integrity of litigation in a very similar
    manner3 7or e(am#le! t,e )alifornia )ode reIuires t,at t,e )ler of t,e )ourt maintain docets
    :1egisters of %ctions) and >oos of Judgments! +,ic, are #ublicly accessible! and serve a
    =otice of .ntry of Judgment on #arties in litigation3 Ao+ever! today t,e Su#erior )ourt of
    )alifornia! )ounty of Dos %ngeles! denies access to t,e 1egisters of %ctions! ,as no defined
    >oo of Judgment! eit,er on #a#er or electronic! and serves no =otices of .ntry of Judgment3
    B
    l((
    C
    't s,ould also be noted t,at t,e courts of t,e State of 'srael! +,ic, originate in t,e .nglis,
    common la+ as +ell! im#lemented over t,e #ast decade '9 systems! similar to t,ose in t,e 2S!
    +it, invalid aut,entication records! and engage in t,e #ractice of simulated litigation3 :see also
    section @) B
    l((i
    !
    l((ii
    C
    e) )stablishing of *double boo!s+ sstems
    2nder #a#er administration of t,e courts! it +as unt,inable to maintain double court files3 't +as
    also administratively a frustrating tas3 =ot so under electronic administration of t,e courts3
    9,roug, P%).1 and )56.)7! t,e 2S courts effectively establis,ed a double court file systemG 9,e
    #ublic and pro2se filers see one set of records! +,ic, do not #ermit t,em to distinguis, bet+een
    valid and void court records3 %ut,ori"ed attorneys! 4udges! and court #ersonnel see a different set
    of court records for t,e same court files3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    33/163 TOC:2
    5oreover! as an inse#arable #art of suc, conditions! t,e courts deny access to records to t,e #ublic
    and to pro2se filers3 %nd as s,o+n in t,e case of Fine v Sheriff and %erni& v Connor et al :sections
    )-a! )-f! @-a)! any attem#t to access court records! #ursuant to +ell establis,ed )onstitutional and
    Due Process rig,ts! meets ,ars, retaliation3
    Suc, conditions ,ave set bac t,e integrity of t,e 2S courts to a medieval level3
    f) %nvalid implementation of authorities and permissions
    /igure 200 T/o en&ries 'ro% &he online PA-9< Do,ke& o' S) v BA 2180A!,v!0?I6A4 in &he () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' Ce/ Hork. The Jan+ar* 16, 6010 en&r* in,l+$es a Do,ke& C+%.er an$ a link &o an
    a,&+al re,or$. The Jan+ar* 1A, 6010 en&r* has no Do,ke& C+%.er $esi"na&e$, an$ no link &o an* re,or$.
    There'ore, no ,o+r& re,or$ exis&s 'or &he la&&er en&r*. @oreover, "iven &he $esi"n o' &he C9>s 2Co&i,es o'
    9le,&roni, >ilin"4, s+,h K$o,ke& &ex& onl*K %in+&es ,o+l$nM& possi.l* .e a+&hen&i,a&e$. There'ore, &he Jan+ar*
    1A, 6010 &elephone hearin" an$ i&s %in+&es sho+l$ .e $ee%e$ si%+la&e$ ,o+r& hearin" an$ si%+la&e$
    %in+&es, like %an* o&hers o' &he sa%e kin$ in &he sa%e li&i"a&ion. (C repor&s ,onsi$er %issin" ,o+r& re,or$s
    a ,ar$inal si"n o' j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion. The en&r* o' &he Jan+ar* 1A, 6010 si%+la&e$ %in+&es /as .* K%roK, like
    %os& o&her en&ries o' &he si%+la&e$ re,or$s in &his ,ase. The a+&hori&* o' K%roK is +nkno/n, .+& &he O''i,e o'
    &he -lerk o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' Ce/ Hork ,on'ir%e$ &ha& $o,ke& en&ries are &o$a*
    %a$e .* persons, /ho are no& a+&horize$ Dep+&* -lerks. The ini&ials K%roK ,anno& possi.l* .e $ee%e$ a
    vali$ ele,&roni, si"na&+re.
    .ntries are made in 2S district court docets by unidentified #ersons of unidentified aut,ority! +it,
    no valid signatures3 Ao+ever! in res#onse to inIuiry t,e office of t,e cler of t,e 2S District )ourt!
    Sout,ern District of =e+ ?or clarified t,at suc, entries are not made by aut,ori"ed De#uty )lers3
    Die+ise! in t,e 2S District )ourt! Sout,ern District of )alifornia! numerous invalid entries +ere
    made in t,e docets of Fine v Sheriff and in %erni& v Connor by 5s Donna 9,omas! an
    unaut,ori"ed #erson! as #art of simulated litigation #ractices :see section @-a)3
    'n addition! t,e system enables attorneys to file records and directly enter t,em in t,e 2S court
    docets! in violation of t,e letter and t,e s#irit of t,e 7udiciary Act :17$*) and t,e Federal *ules of
    Civil $rocedure3
    g) Discrimination in access to the courts
    Practically in all 2S courts! +,ic, +ere e(amined! only attorneys are #ermitted access to )56.)73
    %s a result! a #arty! +,o is re#resented by an attorney! is #ermitted to electronically file records and
    enter t,em into t,e P%).1 docet +it, no oversig,t and accountability by t,e ;ffice of t,e )ler3
    'n contrast! an unre#resented #arty is reIuired to file and serve only on #a#er! incurring substantial
    additional time and money e(#enditure3
    Similarly! t,e courts electronically serve 4udicial records and any ot,er notices on attorneys! +,ile
    unre#resented #arties are served and noticed only on #a#er3 Suc, #ractices o#en t,e +ay to
    numerous met,ods of abuse3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    34/163 TOC:2
    Suc, discrimination in access to t,e courts s,ould be deemed in violation of t,e fundamentals of
    7air 9rial3
    1egarding universal denial of pro se filersE access to )56.)7! see for e(am#le t,e general ;rder
    8$-8- of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District 81 )alifornia3 B
    l((iii
    C
    9x,l+sions >ro% 9le,&roni, >ilin"
    B Pro )e Fi&i"an&s
    Do,+%en&s 'ile$ .* pro se li&i"an&s /ill ,on&in+e &o .e 'ile$ an$ serve$ in &he &ra$i&ional %anner an$
    /ill .e s,anne$ .* &he -lerkLs O''i,e in&o &he -@39-> s*s&e%.
    't s,ould also be noted t,at t,e courts of t,e State of 'srael! +,ic, originate in t,e .nglis, common
    la+ as +ell! im#lemented over t,e #ast decade '9 systems! similar to t,ose in t,e 2S! +,ic,
    discriminate against pro se filers3 :see also section @-b) B
    l((iv
    C
    h) $ppearance of attornes, (ho are not authori#ed as Counsel of Record
    %s documented in t,e 5emorandum ;#inion of 2S Judge Jeff >o,m in t,e Case of Borroer
    $arsley :section )-e)! a##earance of attorneys! +,o are not certified as )ounsel of 1ecord! and
    +it, &no communications +it, clients clause&! ,as become a routine fraud met,od of )ountry+ide
    7inancial )or#oration in courts across t,e 2nited States :see also section )3e)3 B
    l((v
    C
    .ven in a ,ig, visibility case! suc, as S(C v BAC! attorneys a##eared +it, no certificates of
    )ounsel of 1ecord :see section )3,)3
    Die+ise! in Fine v Sheriff attorney 5c)ormic a##eared on be,alf of )alifornia Judge David ?affe
    and t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia +it, no aut,ority at all3 B
    l((vi
    C
    %nd in %erni& v Connor et al! >rian )ave! DDP! a##eared on be,alf of )ountry+ide and later >an
    of %merica +it, no aut,ority as )ounsel of 1ecord :see section )-f! @-a)3
    9,ere is no doubt t,at '9 systems of t,e 2S courts could be designed and im#lemented in a manner
    t,at +ould force an attorney to to file t,e )ertificate of Po+ers of %ttorney #rior to filing any ot,er
    record3 9,at is not t,e case3
    5oreover! t,e manner in +,ic, attorneys are reIuired to file suc, certificates +as left vague and
    ambiguous! often defined in obscure +ay in Local *ules or General -rders of t,e individual courts3
    7or e(am#le! in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! t,e only #lace! +,ere suc,
    issue is defined! is in t,e Certificate of Interested $arties) sti#ulated in General -rder **-87 B
    l((vii
    C
    h) ,niversal failure to doc!et summonses-
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    35/163 TOC:2
    /igure 210 Invali$ s+%%ons in S) v Bank of America orporation in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, )o+&hern
    Dis&ri,& o' Ce/ Hork. The s+%%ons is +nsi"ne$, an$ 'ails &o .ear &he seal o' &he ,o+r&, an$ &here'ore invali$.
    As is &he ,ase in o&her ,o+r&s &ha& ori"ina&e in &he 9n"lish ,o%%on la/, &he s+%%ons es&a.lishes &he
    j+ris$i,&ion o' &he ,o+r& in a "iven %a&&er. There'ore, &he invali$ s+%%ons ren$ers &he en&ire li&i"a&ion invali$
    an$ /i&ho+& an* j+ris$i,&ion. )i%ilar, invali$ s+%%onses /ere $is,overe$ in o&her ,ases an$ o&her ,o+r&s.
    @oreover, &he () ,o+r&s ro+&inel* 'ail &o $o,ke& &he s+%%onses, in $isre"ar$ o' &he () -ivil -o+r&
    Pro,e$+res. There'ore, &he p+.li, a& lar"e ,anno& $is&in"+ish .e&/een vali$ an$ e''e,&+al li&i"a&ion an$
    si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion. >+r&her%ore, &he ,lerk o' &he () -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' Ce/ Hork $enie$ a,,ess &o
    &he s+%%ons, in $isre"ar$ o' &he >irs& A%en$%en& ri"h& &o a,,ess ,o+r& re,or$s. The re,or$, sho/n here,
    /as o.&aine$ &hro+"h >ree$o% o' In'or%a&ion A,& re0+es& on &he )9-. D
    lxxviii
    E
    %s is t,e case in ot,er courts! +,ic, originate in t,e .nglis, common la+! t,e summonses are
    critical documents for establis,ing t,e validity of t,e litigation3 9,roug, t,e issuance of t,e
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    36/163 TOC:2
    summonses and t,eir la+ful e(ecution :service)! t,e court establis,es its 4urisdiction in a given
    matter on s#ecific #arties3 %bsent t,e issuance and e(ecution of valid summonses t,e integrity and
    validity of litigation is undermined3
    Ao+ever! under P%).1 and )56.)7! t,e 2S courts today universally fail to docet summonses! in
    disregard of t,e 2S )ivil )ourt Procedures3 9,erefore! t,e validity of t,e summonses! even +,en
    valid summonses +ere issued and e(ecuted! remains dubious3
    %s is t,e case in ot,er courts! +,ic, originate in t,e .nglis, common la+! -$ 2S) 16*1 reIuiresG
    All /ri&s an$ pro,ess iss+in" 'ro% a ,o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es shall .e +n$er &he seal o' &he ,o+r&
    an$ si"ne$ .* &he ,lerk &hereo'.
    %s s,o+n in multi#le cases in instant submission! t,e 2S courts routinely issue clearly invalid
    summonses! e3g3! unsigned! or missing t,e Seal of t,e )ourt3 Ao+ever! as a result of denial of
    #ublic access to t,e summonses! t,e #ublic cannot discern suc, facts3
    Fraud or human error3
    's it #ossible t,at t,e defective summonses! s,o+n in t,e cases in instant submission! and t,e failure
    to docet t,em 4ust t,e outcome of ,uman errorP
    't is e(tremely unliely to be t,e case for a variety of reasonsG
    9,e s#ecific #rocedures! #ertaining to t,e issuance! e(ecution! and doceting of t,e summonses
    ,ave evolved in t,e courts! originating in t,e .nglis, common la+! s#ecifically to #revent t,e
    fraud on t,e court t,roug, t,e conduct of simulated litigation3
    %ccordingly! t,e Federal *ules of Civil $rocedure) enacted by t,e 2S )ongress are e(#licit
    regarding t,e duty of t,e cler to docet t,e summonses :see also section D4)3 Ao+ever t,e
    failure to docet t,e summonses is almost universal in t,e 2S courts today! and suc, failure is
    essential for concealing t,e common fraud! in,erent in t,e issuance of invalid summonses3
    %s s,o+n above! section )1d! t,e &2nofficial& %nderson 5anual recommends to attorneys not to
    file co#ies of t,e summonses +it, t,e #roof of e(ecution of t,e summonses3
    'n cases! suc, as S(C v Ban& of America Corporation :see also section )3,)! Plaintiff +as a 2S
    agency! and senior attorneys +ere involved in t,e litigation3 9,e record! +,ic, as #roduced in
    res#onse to t,e 7reedom of 'nformation reIuest! s,o+s t,at t,e summonses ,ad never been filed
    +it, t,e cler of t,e court! and multi#le ot,er features of t,e same litigation indicate t,at bot,
    #arties and t,e 4udge +ere determined from start to finis, to #erform simulated litigation in t,at
    case3
    %s documented most clearly in %erni& v Connor et al in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of
    )alifornia! even +,en a pro2se filer detected t,e invalidity of t,e summonses! issued by t,e
    cler! t,e cler refused to issue valid summonses :see also section )-f and @-a)3 5oreover! in
    t,at case! t,e pro2se filer tried to gain access to t,e 2S District )ourt! by #etitioning t,e 2S
    )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit in %erni& v US !istrict Central !istrict of California. >ut t,e 2S
    )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit #atroni"ed t,e corru#t conduct of t,e 2S District )ourt! in a
    manner t,at cannot ,ave any foundation in t,e 2S la+ :see also section )1c)3
    Per,a#s t,e best evidence for t,e fraudulent nature of conduct of t,e 2S district courts! relative
    to t,e issuance of invalid summonses and t,e universal failure to docet summonses comes from
    Dr FerniEs corres#ondence +it, )ler of t,e )ourt 9erry =afisi in t,is matter :see section @-a)3
    9,e corres#ondence #ertained in #art to t,e refusal of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of
    )alifornia! to issue valid summonses in %erni& v Connor et al :see section )3f)! and refusal of
    )ler of t,e )ourt 9erry =afisi to ans+er on validity and integrity of t,e docet and records in
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    37/163 TOC:2
    t,is case3 Aars, retaliation against Dr Ferni follo+ed ,is re#eat attem#ts to access t,e records
    and document t,eir fallacy3
    't s,ould also be noted t,at t,e courts of t,e State of 'srael! +,ic, originate in t,e .nglis,
    common la+ as +ell! im#lemented over t,e #ast decade '9 systems! similar to t,ose in t,e 2S!
    +it, no valid summonses3 :see also section @) B
    l((i(
    C
    i) $dulterated and missing of court records
    'n various cases! ey records are deleted from t,e P%).1 docets of t,e 2S district courts or t,e
    2S courts of a##eals +it, no legal foundation! in disregard of t,e Federal Civil Court $rocedures3
    B
    l(((
    !
    l(((i
    C 2nited =ations re#orts on &Strengt,ening Judicial 'ntegrity %gainst )orru#tion& note
    missing court records as a cardinal sign of 4udicial corru#tion3 B
    l(((ii
    !
    l(((iii
    C
    'n ot,er cases! t,e evidence indicates t,at records +ere adulterated! e3g3! t,e Petition for a Hrit of
    Aabeas )or#us of 1ic,ard 7ine in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia :see section
    @-a)! and decision in t,e Aabeas )or#us #etition of @uantanamo >ay detainee 2t,man %bdul
    1a,im 5o,ammed 2t,man in t,e 2S District )ourt! Has,ington D)! as +idely re#orted by media3
    B
    l(((iv
    C
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    38/163 TOC:2
    /igure 220 The re,or$ &ha& /as provi$e$ .* >e$eral 9le,&ions -o%%i&&ee, in response &o a >ree$o% o'
    In'or%a&ion re0+es& on &he J+$"%en& in iti.ens United v #ederal )lection ommission 2see se,&ions -6o,p4
    ,o%.ine$ /i&h i&s a+&hen&i,a&ion .* &he -lerk o' &he () )+pre%e -o+r&. Co re,or$ o' &he J+$"%en& /as
    $is,overe$ in &he online p+.li, a,,ess s*s&e% o' &he )+pre%e -o+r&. (ni&e$ Ca&ions repor&s on
    )&ren"&henin" J+$i,ial In&e"ri&* lis& %issin" ,o+r& re,or$s as a ,ar$inal si"n o' j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion.
    .) /$C)R and C01)CF " inter"court surve
    P%).1 +as im#lemented +it, various modifications in t,e various 2S courts and courts of
    a##eals! and enables t,e denial of #ublic access to critical court records:Summonses! #a#ers filed
    by #arties! Judgment 'nde(! )alendars of t,e )ourts! Docet %ctivity 1e#ort! )or#orate Parent
    1e#orts! etc) in an arbitrary and ca#ricious fas,ion in t,e various courts! in a##arent violation of
    7irst %mendment and Due Process rig,ts3
    Calendars B
    l(((v
    C
    9,e calendars of t,e courts are one of t,e fundamental &>oos of )ourts&! +,ic, are maintained
    under t,e aut,ority of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt! and t,eir maintenance is an essential #art of t,e
    )lerEs duties in courts originating in t,e .nglis, common la+3
    9,e calendars are critical in ensuring t,e integrity of t,e courts N to #revent t,e conduct of
    simulated ,earings and simulated litigation by 4udges :see section %)>)3
    Ao+ever! a survey of -- of t,e *5 2S district courts! s,o+ed t,at only 14 of t,e -- district court
    #rovided any #ublic access to calendars of t,e courts3 Some of t,e district courts! +,ere access to
    t,e calendars +as entirely denied +ere t,e )entral District of )alifornia :)alifornia .astern!
    =ort,ern! and Sout,ern Districts #ermitted limited access)! Dela+are! and @eorgia 5iddle and
    =ort,ern Districts3
    .ven in courts! +,ere #ublic access to calendars +as #rovided! suc, access +as limited! and t,e
    calendars laced in validity3 9,e 2S District )ourt! District of )olumbia! +as found uniIue in t,e
    e(tent of access #ermitted to its )alendars3
    %dditional data regarding t,e )alendars of t,e )ourts in P%).1 and )56.)7 in various 2S
    district courts is summari"ed in t+o tables3 B
    l(((vi
    !
    l(((vii
    C
    7udgment Inde4
    9,e Judgment >oo! lie t,e )alendar of t,e )ourt! is considered one of t,e fundamental >oos of
    )ourt! +,ic, establis, t,e integrity of t,e courts! and its maintenance is #art of t,e duties of t,e
    )ler of t,e )ourt3 2nder P%).1 and )56.)7! t,e Judgment >oo +as re#laced by Judgment
    'nde(3
    9,e Judgment 'nde( in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! for e(am#le! is
    instrumental for documenting t,e invalid conduct of t,e 2S District )ourt and t,e 2S )ourt of
    %##eals! relative to t,e t+o o##osite Judgments! +,ic, a##ear in t,e P%).1 docet of Dog )abin
    1e#ublicans v 2S% et al3 9,e first Judgment is listed as entered in t,e Judgment 'nde(! t,e second
    is not3 :see sections )-m!n)
    Ao+ever! #ublic access to t,e Judgment 'nde( is not #ermitted in all 2S district courts3 7or
    e(am#le! #ublic access to t,e Judgment 'nde( is denied in most 2S distinct courts in @eorgia3
    9,erefore! t,e #ublic is denied t,e rig,t to ascertain! +,ic, 4udgments +ere indeed entered as valid
    and effectual records of t,e 2S courts3
    *elated .ransactions *eport
    9,e 1elated 9ransactions 1e#ort #rovides an im#ortant tool for monitoring t,e integrity of
    encoding of various #a#ers by t,e staff of t,e ;ffice of t,e )ler :com#laint! motion! res#onse!
    4udgment! etc)! and t,e relations,i# among t,e records in a given docet3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    39/163 TOC:2
    't is t,roug, t,e 1elated 9ransactions 1e#ort t,at t,e ty#ical &.vents& and &Status& met,od of
    electronic case management is a##lied to t,e records in t,e P%).1 docet3 9,erefore! an &.vent&
    is o#ened! for e(am#le! +,en a &5otion& is filed and entered! and t,e &.vent& is closed! +,en and
    &;rder&! related to t,e same &5otion& is filed and entered! @ranting! Denying! etc! t,at given
    &5otion&3
    9,e 1elated 9ransactions 1e#ort is critical for assessing t,e integrity of a P%).1 docet3
    9,e %dministrative ;ffice of t,e 2S )ourts failed to #ublis, a dictionary of t,e terms and rules for
    correct encoding of 9ransactions by t,e offices of t,e clers in P%).1 and )56.)73 Ao+ever!
    rules could be inferred t,roug, data mining and acIuaintance +it, ot,er case management systems
    of ot,er courts3
    7or e(am#le! a common form of dece#tion in t,e P%).1 docets is encoding a &5otion& as
    &5isc&! and not relating any &;rder& to it3 2nder suc, encoding! no &.vent& and no &Status& is
    o#ened3
    Karious courts deny access to t,is im#ortant tool3 %s s,o+n in t,e corres#ondence +it, )ler of t,e
    )ourt 9erry =afisi :section @-a)! suc, access is denied in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of
    )alifornia! even to a #arty in ,is o+n litigation3
    !) %' sstem of the ,S Supreme Court
    9,e electronic #ublic access and case management systems :name unno+n) of t,e 2S Su#reme
    )ourt undermine t,e foundation of t,e 1ule of Da+ B
    l(((viii
    !
    l(((i(
    !
    (c
    !
    (ci
    !
    (cii
    !
    (ciii
    CG
    9,e systems enable t,e #ublication of docets! 4ournals! decisions! and 4udgments by 2S
    Su#reme )ourt #ersonnel of unno+n aut,ority3
    Suc, records are of vague and ambiguous validity3
    Public access is denied to valid! signed and aut,enticated court records3
    9,e Su#reme )ourt routinely serves unsigned! unaut,enticated decisions on #arties before t,e
    )ourt3
    9,e data! found in t,e Journals! Docets! and Decisions in in,erently inconsistent and
    contradictory3 B
    x,iv
    ,
    x,v
    ,
    x,vi
    ,
    x,vii
    ,
    x,viii
    , C
    't s,ould also be noted t,at it remains unclear! +,et,er t,e Su#reme )ourt of t,e 2nited States
    ,olds its electronic records of any validity at all3 5ost liely not3 Ao+ever! t,e mere fact t,at suc,
    central issue remains ambiguous! demonstrates t,e invalidity of t,e system3
    9,e #re#onderance of t,e evidence suggests t,at t,e Su#reme )ourt maintains #a#er court files!
    +,ic, it ,olds t,e valid and effectual records of t,e )ourt3 Ao+ever! attem#ts to gain access to t,e
    #a#er files! for e(am#le in t,e case of t,e Aabeas )or#us of 1ic,ard 7ine :see section )-a)! failed
    to discover valid 4udicial records eit,er3 B
    (ci(
    C
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    40/163 TOC:2
    /igure 2=0 (nsi"ne$, +n,er&i'ie$ De,ision re,or$ o' &he () )+pre%e -o+r& in &he =a.eas -orp+s Pe&i&ion
    #ine v Sheriff 20A!16704, as $is,overe$ +pon inspe,&ion in &he paper 'iles o' &he () )+pre%e -o+r&. The
    )+pre%e -o+r& serves on par&ies +nsi"ne$, +na+&hen&i,a&e$ $e,ision re,or$s. I& sho+l$ also .e no&e$ &ha&
    &he ,er&i'i,a&ion s&a&e%en& is invali$, sa*in" KA &r+e ,op*K, ins&ea$ o' KTr+e -op* o' &he Ori"inalK. Co vali$
    $e,ision re,or$s /ere 'o+n$ +pon inspe,&ion o' &he paper )+pre%e -o+r& 'iles in &he ,ases rela&e$ &o &he
    =a.eas -orp+s pe&i&ions o' <i,har$ >ine. D
    ,
    E
    't s,ould also be noted t,at t,e courts of t,e State of 'srael! +,ic, originate in t,e .nglis, common
    la+ as +ell! im#lemented over t,e #ast decade '9 systems! similar to t,ose in t,e 2S! and t,e '9
    system of t,e 'sraeli Su#reme )ourt is #articularly noted for its invalidity3 :see also section @) B
    ci
    C
    Hit, it! t,e Presiding Justice of t,e 'sraeli Su#reme )ourt refuses to clarify +,et,er t,e Su#reme
    )ourt ,olds its electronic records of any validity3 B
    cii
    C
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    41/163 TOC:2
    %! Case stu&ies
    Data mining! +,ic, formed t,e basis for t,e current re#ort +as conducted t,roug, #ublic access to
    P%).1! as #ermitted by la+! in over -8 2S district courts! 2S banru#tcy courts! and 2S courts of
    a##eals3
    Aere! some individual case studies are #resented! to demonstrate t,e fraud in,erent in t,e design
    and o#eration of t,e '9 systems of t,e 2S courts! and t,eir em#loyment for t,e de#rivation of )ivil!
    )onstitutional! and Auman 1ig,ts3
    1evie+ of t,e records of t,e individual cases! belo+! demonstrates t,e corru#ting im#act of t,e
    invalid! fraudulent '9 systems of t,e 2S courts today3 9,e cases demonstrate t,at t,e 2S courts at
    all levels ,ave ado#ted t,e #ractice of conducting simulated litigation and t,e #ublication of
    simulated court record on a routine basis3 B
    ciii
    C
    9,e #ractices of simulated litigation and issuance of simulated court records are #robably as old as
    t,e courts t,emselves3 ;ver centuries! record ee#ing of t,e courts! t,e core of Due Process! and
    t,e ;ffice of t,e )ler evolved to #revent suc, #ractices3 9,e evidence #rovided in instant
    submission! relative to t,e 2S courts! in t,e A1% -818 submission on t,e 2nited states! relative to
    t,e )alifornia courts! and in t,e A1% -813 submission on t,e State of 'srael demonstrates t,at t,e
    im#lementation of invalid! fraudulent '9 systems in t,e state and 2S courts ,ad an un#recedented
    corru#ting effect on t,e courts3
    =eedless to say! com#uter tec,nology could ,ave ,ad t,e o##osite effect! if correctly im#lemented3
    Die+ise! 2= re#orts on &Strengt,ening Judicial 'ntegrity& encourage t,e im#lementation of '9
    systems in t,e courts! to en,ance 4udicial integrity3 B
    civ
    C
    a) Habeas Cor$us in the ,nite& States ( the case of Richar& *saac .ine >
    cv
    ?
    /igure 240 >ro% le'&8 >or%er () prose,+&or, an&i!j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion a,&ivis& <i,har$ >ine in an in&ervie/ 'ro%
    Fos An"eles prison in 600A. () @a"is&ra&e -arla #oehrle an$ () J+$"e John #al&er, in &he () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia. The evi$en,e in$i,a&es &ha& &he ha.eas ,orp+s pe&i&ion /as s+.je,&e$ &o
    perversion o' j+s&i,e &hro+"h &he ,on$+,& o' pro&ra,&e$ si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion. The () -o+r& o' Appeals, A&h
    -ir,+i&, an$ &he () )+pre%e -o+r& a,&e$ in &he sa%e %anner. <i,har$ >ine re%aine$ i%prisone$ +n$er
    soli&ar* ,on'ine%en& 'or 1I %on&hs, /i&h no le"al re,or$s as &he 'o+n$a&ion 'or his i%prison%en&. Fike/ise,
    his release /as ,on$+,&e$ /i&h no vali$ le"al re,or$ as i&s 'o+n$a&ion.
    9,e case of 1ic,ard 'saac 7ine is of uniIue significance! since it #rovided detailed documentation
    of t,e unla+ful de#rivation of t,e liberty of an anti-4udicial corru#tion activist3 9,e case is
    described in furt,er detail in an academic #a#er! #ublis,ed sub4ect to anonymous #eer-revie+3 B
    cvi
    C
    9,e uniIuely detailed documentation of t,e case #rovides evidence of t,e unla+ful de#rivation of
    liberty t,roug, coordinated o#eration of fraudulent electronic record systems inG
    9,e )alifornia Su#erior )ourt! )ounty of Dos %ngelesM
    S,eriffEs De#artment of t,e )ounty of Dos %ngelesM
    2S District )ourt! )entral District of )aliforniaM
    2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! and
    2S Su#reme )ourt3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    42/163 TOC:2
    Arrest and imprisonment of *ichard Fine
    /igure 220 <i,har$ >ineLs p+rpor&e$ Bookin" <e,or$, as provi$e$ .* &he Fos An"eles )heri''Ls Depar&%en&
    in response on in0+ir* .* Fos An"eles -o+n&* )+pervisor An&onovii,h. The 'alse an$ $eli.era&el* %islea$in"
    re,or$ lis&s >ine as arres&e$ on lo,a&ion an$ .* a+&hori&* o' &he non!exis&en& )an Pe$ro @+ni,ipal -o+r&.
    The )heri''Ls Depar&%en& re'+se$ &o ,orre,& &he Bookin" <e,or$, even a'&er i& /as repea&e$l* no&i,e$ o' i&s
    'alla,*. I& sho+l$ .e no&e$ &ha& s+,h ele,&roni, .ookin" re,or$ is +nsi"ne$ an$ +n,er&i'ie$, an$ &he na%e o'i&s
    a+&hor is +nkno/n. D
    ,vii
    E
    7ormer 2S #rosecutor 1ic,ard '3 7ine e(#osed and rebued t,e taing by Dos %ngeles 4udges of
    /not #ermitted0 #ayments! +,ic, +ere labeled by media /bribes03
    'n t,e aftermat,! a bill +as #assed and signed into la+ by t,en )alifornia @overnor %rnold
    Sc,+ar"enegger on 7ebruary -8! -88*! #roviding /retroactive immunity0! called by media
    &#ardons& to all 4udges involved3
    9+o +ees later! on 5arc, 4! -88*! 1ic,ard 7ine +as arrested by t,e Harrant Detail of Dos
    %ngeles )ounty S,eriffEs De#artment in t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! )ounty of Dos %ngeles! in
    do+nto+n Dos %ngeles! at t,e end of a dramatic off t,e calendar #roceeding #resided by Judge
    David ?affe! re#resented as &Sentencing& - in t,e #resence of media3
    1ic,ard 7ine +as attem#ting to disIualify Judge ?affe3 9,e basis for t,e affidavits of
    disIualification for a cause +as Judge David ?affeEs acce#ting of suc, &not #ermitted& #ayments
    from a #arty to t,e litigation t,en at bar N 'arina !el *ey "ome -ners8 Association v County of
    Los Angeles :>S18*4-8)3
    9,e entire #roceeding later failed to a##ear in t,e #ublicly available litigation c,ronology! #ublis,ed
    online by t,e court3 Die+ise! t,e court record t,at +as t,e 5arc, 4! -88* Judgment and ;rder of
    )ontem#t! including +,at +as re#resented as &Sentencing&! +,ic, +as +idely re#orted by media!
    +as later discovered to be invalid on its face3 9,e record +as also lacing valid aut,entication3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    43/163 TOC:2
    9,roug,out t,e Aabeas )or#us #etitions of 1ic,ard 7ine! and to t,is date! t,e Dos %ngeles Su#erior
    )ourt denies access to t,e 1egister of %ctions :)alifornia civil docet N t,e official record of t,e
    litigation) in t,e case of 'arina !el *ey "ome -ners8 Association v County of Los Angeles in
    obvious violation of 7irst %mendment )ivil 1ig,ts3
    9,erefore! t,ere is no +ay to tell +,et,er t,e 5arc, 4! -88* #roceeding +as at all truly listed as a
    court #roceeding by t,e court itself3 9,e 5arc, 4! -88* 5inutes :#rotocol)! remained unsigned! and
    never mentioned any sentencing ,earing at all3
    1ic,ard 7ine +as later ,eld in t,e 5enEs )entral Jail facility in Dos %ngeles - #art of t,e
    9+in 9o+ers Jail com#le(! under unusual! #ossibly un#recedented conditions3 Ae +as ,eld under
    continuous solitary confinement! in a ,os#ital room in t,e 4ail! albeit - no disease or disability +ere
    ever claimed by 4ail aut,orities3
    1ic,ard 7ine +as ,eld all along +it, no valid +arrant and no valid booing records at all3 9,e
    information #rovided by t,e S,eriffEs De#artment of Dos %ngeles )ounty in t,is matter on its
    electronic record system - t,e 'nmate 'nformation )enter - +as false and deliberately misleading3
    9,e arrest and booing +ere listed as if t,ey ,ad taen #lace on location and by aut,ority of t,e
    5unici#al )ourt of San Pedro3 Ao+ever! no munici#al courts ,ad e(isted in Dos %ngeles for
    almost a decade at t,at time3
    'n t,e first fe+ mont,s of ,is 4ailing! 7ine +as denied access to #en and #a#er! and suc, conditions
    undermined ,is ability to file ,is Aabeas )or#us and related #etitions3 Jail aut,orities also e(#licitly
    attem#ted in t,e initial #eriod to de#rive ,im of t,e rig,t to re#resent ,imself! and to coerce ,im to
    acce#t re#resentation by counsel! +,ic, 7ine declined3
    ;n June 7! -88*! t,e Dos %ngeles 9imes #ublis,ed re#ort :considered unfavorable) by female
    Journalist Kictoria Lim! +,o #ur#ortedly managed to enter t,e 5enEs Jail! intervie+ 7ine! and
    emerge out of t,e 4ail unnoticed! at a time t,at t,e S,eriffEs De#artment and t,e court banned
    intervie+s +it, 7ine3
    US !istrict Court) Central !istrict of California 2 $etition for a #rit of "a+eas Corpus
    7ineEs #etition for a +rit of Aabeas )or#us! Fine v Sheriff of the County of Los Angeles :-G8*-cv-
    81*14) +as dictated by #,one to a friend! and +as filed on be,alf of 1ic,ard 7ine at t,e 2S )ourt!
    )entral District of )alifornia :Dos %ngeles)! but +it,out ,is ,and signature! and +it,out revie+ by
    ,im of t,e filed document3
    Per,a#s t,e best evidence for t,e fraudulent nature of t,e entire court file and records in t,is case
    comes from Dr FerniEs corres#ondence +it, )ler of t,e )ourt 9erry =afisi and ),ief Judge
    %udrey )ollins of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia in t,is matter :see section
    @-a)3 9,e corres#ondence #ertained to t,e denial of access to records and refusal of t,e )ler of t,e
    )ourt 9erry =afisi to ans+er on validity and integrity of t,e docet and records in t,is case3 9,e
    corres#ondence also #resented detailed evidence t,at t,e commencing record in t,is case +as
    adulterated after being filed! and t,at t,e litigation ,ad no valid aut,entication records :=.7s)! and
    +as in fact simulated litigation from start to finis,3
    Aars, retaliation against Dr Ferni follo+ed ,is re#eat attem#ts to access t,e records and document
    t,eir fallacy3
    1ic,ard 7ine later claimed t,at ey documents +ere missing from t,e P%).1 docet3 B
    cviii
    C
    =eedless to say! in,erent to t,e case +as t,e fact t,at 1ic,ard 7ine +as im#risoned! and ,ad no
    access to P%).1 and )56.)7! to ins#ect t,e registration of t,e court records in ,is case3
    9,e case +as unusual in t,at t,e S,eriff! named as 1es#ondent! refused to res#ond3
    7ollo+ing t,e refusal of t,e S,eriff to res#ond! 7ine demanded ,is immediate release3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    44/163 TOC:2
    5agistrate )arla Hoe,rle! denied ,is demand3
    .ventually! res#onse +as filed by t,e Dos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt and Judge David ?affe! +,o +as
    not named res#ondent in t,e case333
    Ao+ever! suc, res#onse +as filed by attorney Levin 5c)ormic! +,o failed to file t,e reIuired
    )ertification of )ounsel of 1ecord for Judge David ?affe! and t,erefore aut,ori"ed to file and
    a##ear in t,e case on t,eir be,alf3 B
    ci(
    C %s detailed above :see section )1,)! a##earance of
    unaut,ori"ed attorneys! +it, &no communications +it, client clause&! are a common form of
    corru#tion in t,e 2S courts today3 'n fact! %ttorney 5c)ormic never filed any affidavit or any
    ot,er record signed by ,is #ur#orted client! Judge David ?affe! and lie+ise! never filed any #a#er
    originating in t,e Su#erior )ourt3
    %ccess to t,e )alifornia docet :1egister of %ctions) of t,e underlying Su#erior )ourt case +as
    never filed in t,e case! and access to t,e docet +as and is denied3
    7urt,er investigation #rovided evidence t,at %ttorney 5c)ormic +as in fact never aut,ori"ed as
    )ounsel of 1ecord by Judge David ?affe and t,e Dos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt3 B
    c(
    C
    9,e June 1-! -88* 1e#ort O 1ecommendations issued by 5agistrate )arla Hoe,rle concluded by
    recommending Denial +it, Pre4udice of t,e Aabeas )or#us Petition3 9,e -5 #age revie+! carefully
    referenced! +as distinguis,ed as a Aabeas )or#us revie+ by t,e fact t,at it failed to ever e(#licitly
    state t,e ca#tion of t,e Dos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt case t,at +as under revie+! or ever mention t,e
    +ord &+arrant&3
    % June -*! -88* Judgment issued by Judge Jo,n Halter! +,o #resided in t,e case after a number
    of recusals! ado#ted t,e 1e#ort and 1ecommendations3
    Ao+ever! bot, of t,ese court #a#ers! lie all #a#ers issued by t,e 2S3 District )ourt in t,is case
    laced aut,entication! reIuired to mae court #a#ers valid and effectual! and +ere t,erefore invalid
    court records :see sections )1d! .1! @-a)3
    1egardless of t,e fact t,at all 4udicial record in t,is case s,ould be deemed void! not voidable! one
    s,ould #articularly note t,at in ,er June 1-! -88* 1e#ort and 1ecommendation 2S 5agistrate )arla
    Hoe,rle saysG B
    c(i
    C
    %%0 S)AN?AR? O/ R,D%,1
    <evie/ o' &he Pe&i&ion in &his ,ase is "overne$ .* provisions o' &he An&i&erroris% an$ 9''e,&ive Dea&h
    Penal&* A,& o' 1AA? 2:A9DPA;4 0 (n$er A9DPA, a 'e$eral ,o+r& %a* no& "ran& ha.eas relie' on a ,lai%
    a$j+$i,a&e$ on i&s %eri&s in s&a&e ,o+r& +nless &he a$j+$i,a&ion:res+l&e$ in a $e,ision &ha& /as ,on&rar*
    &o, or involve$ an +nreasona.le appli,a&ion o', ,learl* es&a.lishe$ >e$eral la/, as $e&er%ine$ .* &he
    )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es,; or :res+l&e$ in a $e,ision &ha& /as .ase$ on an +nreasona.le
    $e&er%ina&ion o' &he 'a,&s in li"h& o' &he evi$en,e presen&e$ in &he )&a&e ,o+r& pro,ee$in".; 6I (.).-. J
    66742$4.
    =eedless to say! t,e im#risonment of 1ic,ard 7ine +it, no la+ful records conforming +it, t,e
    fundamental reIuirements of t,e la+! +as unreasonable a##lication of clearly establis,ed 7ederal
    la+3 >ut t,e records of Fine v Sheriff in t,e 2S District )ourt! as a +,ole! and t,e reasoning in t,e
    1e#ort and 1ecommendation in #articular! demonstrate t,at t,e #rivilege of Aabeas )or#us +as and
    is in fact sus#ended in t,e 2S today! under t,e rubric of %ntiterrorism3
    US Court of Appeals) 0th Circuit5 (mergency $etition
    %n .mergency Petition filed on 7ineEs be,alf at t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals for t,e *t, )ircuit - Fine v
    Sheriff :8*-716*-) after t,e S,eriff refused to ans+er on t,e Aabeas )or#us and 5agistrate Hoe,rle
    refused to order ,is immediate release3
    9,e .mergency Petition +as denied in t,e June 38! -88* ;rder denying t,e #etition! bearing t,e
    names of ),ief Judge %le( Lo"insi and )ircuit Judges 1ic,ard Pae" and 1ic,ard 9allman3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    45/163 TOC:2
    Ao+ever! t,e Decision record +as unsigned! unentered! and laced aut,entication as +ell :see
    section )1d)3
    H,ile t,e Petition +as before t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! t,is aut,or of instant
    submission! Dr Ferni! filed +it, t,e )ourt an .( Parte %##lication for Deave to 7ile! to inform it
    of t,e false records of t,e Aabeas )or#us #etition in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of
    )alifornia3 B
    c(ii
    C
    9,e %##lication +as denied3
    Ao+ever! since t,e aut,or +as t,en listed as a #arty on t,e Petition! t,e aut,or +as served t,e June
    38! -88* ;rder by ),ief Judge %le( Lo"insi! Judges Pae" and 9allman3 9,e ;rder :Dt Q4) +as
    served unsigned! +it, no =D% :=otice of Docet %crtivity! see section )1d) at all3 B
    c(iii
    C
    5uc, later! t,e =D%s of t,e Petition +ere discovered t,roug, ins#ection in t,e 2S )ourt of
    %##eals3 B
    c(iv
    C 9,e =D%s included only truncated &.lectronic Document Stam#& :see section )1d)!
    and t,erefore s,ould be deemed void3
    't s,ould be noted t,at t,e =D% for t,e June 38! -88* ;rder says! &=otice +ill be mailed to", listing
    both Joseph Zernik and Richard Fine on the mailing list. This author never received the NDA with
    the copy o the unsigned !rder" and likewise" was inormed by Richard Fine that he had never
    received any N#F or NDA in his cases.
    9,e invalidity of t,e records of t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! in t,e #etitions and a##eal of
    1ic,ard 7ine is described in furt,er details in t+o #a#ers in t,e form of reIuest for e(#ert o#inion3
    B
    c(v
    C
    Supreme Court of the United States
    .ventually! 7ine filed #etitions and a##lications to t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt3 Ao+ever! t,e #attern of
    #retense revie+ and invalid court records and #rocedures #ersisted even in t,e ,ig,est court of t,e
    land3 See section )1l for furt,er details regarding t,e records of 1ic,ard 7ine in t,e Su#reme
    )ourt3
    % 5otion to 'ntervene +as also filed by t,e aut,or of instant submission in t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt!
    including detailed revie+ of t,e false electronic records! #ertaining to t,e im#risonment of 1ic,ard
    7ine in t,e Dos %ngeles S,eriffEs De#artment and t,e courts! including t,e Su#erior )ourt of
    )alifornia! t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t,
    )ircuit! and t,e Su#reme )ourt itself3 B
    c(vi
    C
    Ao+ever! t,e #a#ers! +,ic, +ere duly filed! +ere never doceted and never revie+ed by t,e 2S
    Su#reme )ourt3 'nstead! t,ey +ere /returned0 by mail by &)ourt )ounsel& Danny >icell +it, no
    aut,ority at all! in a##arent violation of bot, 2S and international la+! +it, no revie+ at all3
    5oreover! +,ile t,e online docets of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt indicated t,at t,e cases of 1ic,ard
    7ine +ere revie+ed and denied! attem#ts to access t,e records of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt! to ins#ect
    and to co#y t,e records! found no valid 4udicial records to su##ort t,e notations in t,e online
    docets :see also section )1l)3
    Inspection of paper court files of the US Supreme Court
    1ecords! +,ic, +ere retrieved from t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt file in t,e 1ic,ard 7ine v Derory >aca!
    S,eriff of Dos %ngeles )ounty :8*-%$-7) N a##lication for stay of e(ecution of ongoing solitary
    confinement - failed to discover any valid court records su##orting t,e #ur#orted denial of t,e
    %##lication in t,e Su#reme )ourt )onference eit,er on %#ril -3! -818! as sc,eduled! or on %#ril
    -6! -818! as noted in t,e online Su#reme )ourt docet3 >
    cxvii
    ?
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    46/163 TOC:2
    Su#reme )ourt records also failed to s,o+ any record of service and notice to t,e #arties of t,e
    #ur#orted denial3 'nformation obtained from t,e im#risoned former 2S #rosecutor 1ic,ard 7ine!
    lie+ise! indicated t,at ,e ,ad never received any notice at all of t,e #ur#orted denial3
    9,e %##lication +as first submitted to %ssociate Justice %nt,ony Lennedy3 9,e online docet noted
    denial by Justice Lennedy on 5arc, 1-! -818! and 1ic,ard 7ine received a notice to t,at effect as
    +ell3 Ao+ever! t,e notice +as by )ounsel Danny >icell! +,o +as not aut,ori"ed as a De#uty
    )ler3 5oreover! t,e notice +as unsigned! and t,e co#y in )ourt file +as never stam#ed /7'D.D03
    7urt,ermore! t,ere +as no valid record of denial by Justice Lennedy to form t,e legal foundation
    for suc, notice3 >
    cxviii
    ?
    7ormer 2S #rosecutor t,en re-submitted t,e %##lication to %ssociate Justice 1ut, @insburg! +,o in
    turn referred it to 2S Su#reme )ourt conference! sc,eduled for %#ril -3! -8183
    Prior to t,e %#ril -3! -818! 5r Danny >icell! again N +it, no aut,ority at all! eliminated from t,e
    court file records filed in t,e case! +,ic, included evidence! including! but not limited details of ,is
    5arc, 1-! -818 invalid notice of denial by Justice Lennedy3 5r >icellRs conduct relative to t,e
    5arc, 1-! -818 notice and t,e conseIuent elimination of records from t,e )ourt file +ere sub4ect
    of a com#laint filed +it, 2S %ttorney ;ffice! Has,ington D)3 B
    c(i(
    C
    ;n %#ril -3! -818! outcome of t,e conference remained unno+n3 Ao+ever! an %#ril -6! -818 note
    in t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt online docet! B
    c((
    C indicated denial of t,e %##lication3 9,e records! +,ic,
    +ere obtained on July -6! -818 from t,e )ourt file! s,o+ed no legal foundation at all for t,e %#ril
    -6! -818 denial note in t,e online docet3
    9,erefore! it is alleged t,at t,e case documented t,e re#eated #ublication of false and deliberately
    misleading notes in t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt online docet - relative to a #ur#orted 5arc, 1-! -818
    denial! and later N relative to a #ur#orted %#ril -36%#ril -6! -818 denial! t,e issuing of false notices
    by 2S Su#reme )ourt staff relative to t,e #ur#orted 5arc, 1-! -818 denial by Justice Lennedy! and
    failure of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt Justices to dis#ose of matters before t,em3
    *elease of *ichard Fine
    ;n Se#tember 17! -818! 1ic,ard 7ine +as released by t,e S,eriff3 %gain! t,e release too #lace
    +it, no valid order ever entered by t,e Dos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt3 'nstead! Se#tember 17! -818
    5inutes +ere issued under ca#tion of 'arina v LA County :>S18*4-8)! +,ere issuance of an order
    +as described! but no evidence of a signed order +as ever found3 9,e 5inutes also failed to s#ell
    out t,at an order +as ever signed by Judge ?affe to affect t,e release of 1ic,ard 7ine on t,at date3
    9,e Se#tember 17! -818 5inutes o#ening sentence statesG
    >or reasons kno/n onl* &o hi%sel', >ine is a&&e%p&in" &o o.&ain his releaseO
    7urt,er! t,e Se#tember 17! -818 5inutes 4ustify t,e abru#t release as follo+sG
    I& is .e,o%in" in,reasin"l* ,lear &ha& >ineMs ,on$+,& is irra&ionalO =is ,on$+,& is .izarre, an$ &ha&
    'a,& alone %+s& .e ,onsi$ere$ .* &his ,o+r&...
    9,e Se#tember 17! -818 5inutes also failed to a##ear among t,e list of court records in t,e case!
    +,ic, +ere #ublis,ed online by t,e )ourt3 Die+ise! t,e )ase Summary failed to state t,at any
    ;rder +as signed by Judge ?affe on Se#tember 17! -818! or entered by t,e )ourt on t,at date3 ;f
    note! a day earlier! Judge David ?affe #osted minutes! +,ic, denied 1ic,ard 7ineRs reIuest for
    release3 H,at caused t,e c,ange of mind overnig,t and t,e abru#t release of 7ine on Se#tember
    17!-818! remained unno+n3
    9,e )alifornia )ode of 1egulations! 9itle 15G )rime Prevention and )orrections! J3-733
    %cce#tance and Surrender of )ustody! statesG
    #ar$ens an$ s+perin&en$en&s %+s& no& a,,ep& or s+rren$er ,+s&o$* o' an* prisoner +n$er an*
    ,ir,+%s&an,es, ex,ep& .* vali$ ,o+r& or$er or o&her $+e pro,ess o' la/.
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    47/163 TOC:2
    Significance of the case of *ichard Fine
    )ombined! t,e arrest! im#risonment! and release of 1ic,ard 7ine #resent an e(am#le of arbitrary
    and ca#ricious de#rivation of liberty t,roug, collusion of t,e Dos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt and t,e
    Dos %ngeles S,eriffRs De#artment3
    9,e case reflects +ides#read corru#tion of t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! )ounty of Dos %ngeles!
    t,e largest county court in t,e 2nited States! and cover-u# of t,e same by t,e 2S courts3
    1e#ort regarding corru#tion of t,e Su#erior )ourt! including! but not limited to! t,e im#risonment
    of 1ic,ard 7ine! +as incor#orated by reference into t,e -818 2P1 :2niversal Periodic 1evie+)
    Staff 1e#ort of t,e Auman 1ig,ts )ouncil of t,e 2nited =ations! +it, a note regarding /corru#tion
    of t,e courts and t,e legal #rofession and discrimination by la+ enforcement in )alifornia03
    )overage of t,e case +as mostly left to off mainstream media3 Darge cor#orate media outlet re#orts
    +ere incom#lete and at times #artial or #lainly false3
    ;ne of t,e central recommendations of t,e -818 2P1 re#ort on t,e 2nited States #ertained to
    restoration of t,e rig,t for Aabeas )or#us! +it, reference to detentions in @uantanamo >ay3
    %s documented in t,e case of 1ic,ard 7ine! t,e rig,t of Aabeas )or#us +as effectively denied also
    on a 2S citi"en! former 2S #rosecutor! in t,e territorial 2nited States! t,roug, effective denial of
    access to ,onest courts3
    Per,a#s t,e most im#ortant insig,t gained from t,e case of 1ic,ard 7ine #ertains to t,e ey role of
    false and deliberately misleading electronic record systems in t,e courts and #risons in t,e 2nited
    States in t,e abuse of Auman 1ig,ts3
    Due to t,e unusual set of c,aracters! t,e number of court cases filed by 1ic,ard 7ine! and t,e
    meticulous documentation! t,e case as a +,ole #rovides un#aralleled study of t,e 4ustice
    system!Auman 1ig,ts! and civil society conditions in t,e 2nited States at t,e onset of t,e -1st
    century3
    b) Sieverding et al v- ,nited States Dept of Justice " ,SDC DC
    /igure 2@0 The ,ase o' Sieverding v US Dept of -ustice ori"ina&e$ in &he 'alse i%prison%en& o' Ga*
    )iever$in" .* &he () @arshals )ervi,e, &hro+"h &he e%plo*%en& o' 'alse ele,&roni, /arran& an$ .ookin"
    re,or$s /i&h 'ake viola&ion ,o$es. )i%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion in &his %a&&er /as ,on$+,&e$ .* J+$"e John D Ba&es in
    &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-.
    Sieverding et al v. United States Government :1G8*-cv-8856-) in t,e 2S District )ourt! District of
    )olumbia! originated in t,e false im#risonment of Lay Sieverding by t,e 2S 5ars,als Service! t,e
    creation of false and deliberately misleading records! #ertaining to ,er arrest and im#risonment by
    7>' and ot,er federal agencies! and denial of access to t,e records of t,e im#risonment! as detailed
    in t,e )om#laint3 B
    c((i
    C
    1evie+ of t,e docet and ot,er court file records in t,e case s,o+sG B
    c((ii
    C
    i3 Docet as a H,oleG
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    48/163 TOC:2
    9,e Docet failed to include any of t,e %ttestation6%ut,entication records by t,e cler :=.7s N
    =otices of .lectronic 7iling)3 9,erefore! it is im#ossible to ascertain t,e validity of t,e records3
    2#on information and belief! Plaintiff Lay Sieverding +as never served =.7s in t,e case! and
    ,as never gained access to t,e =.7s3 9,e =.7s are not accessible in P%).13 9,erefore! t,ere
    is no +ay to ascertain! based on t,e #ublicly accessible P%).1 records! +,et,er any of t,e
    4udicial records in t,is docet are deemed valid and effectual records! or only simulated records3
    1elated 9ransactions 1e#ortG 9,e 5arc, 15! -818 ;rder @ranting 5otion to Dismiss :Dt Q857)
    +as not doceted as related to t,e )om#laint :Dt Q881)! and t,e )om#laint +as not doceted as
    SterminatedR3
    Judgment 'nde(G 7ailed to record t,e dis#ositive order in t,e case - 5arc, 15! -818 ;rder
    @ranting 5otion to Dismiss :Dt Q857)
    /igure 2A0 J+$"%en& In$ex o' Sieverding v US Dept of -ustice ! 'ail+re &o en&er &he $isposi&ive or$er in &his
    ,ase ! @ar,h 17, 6010 Or$er Bran&in" @o&ion &o Dis%iss 2Dk& P0774.
    ii3 S#ecific docet entries
    +/t @AA#G 5arc, -5! -88* )ivil )over S,eet N not signed by )ler3
    +/t @noneG 5arc, -5! -88* Summons
    Summons +as not doceted! in a##arent violation of t,e Federal *ules of Civil $rocedure) as is
    t,e case #ractically in all 2S district courts today :see also section )1i)
    /igure 2B0 Do,ke& o' Sieverding v US Dept of -ustice ! Dk& Pnone ! 'ail+re &o $o,ke& &he s+%%ons. The
    $o,ke& &ex& 'or s+%%ons has no $o,ke& n+%.er an$ no link &o an* re,or$. The pra,&i,e, ,alle$ KTex& onl*K
    or$ers or %in+&es is a ,o%%on /a* o' perver&in" li&i"a&ion in &he () ,o+r&s 2see also se,&ion -1$ an$ -6j4
    +/t @noneG =o %ssignment ;rder for Judge Judge Jo,n D3 >ates a##ears in t,e docet3
    9,erefore! Judge >ates s,ould be deemed to ,ave #resided in t,is case +it, no aut,ority at
    all3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    49/163 TOC:2
    +/t @AA6(1G June 1! -88* DefendantEs 5otion to Dismiss! includes unsigned Declaration by
    De#uty 2S 5ars,al Ste#,en D Hallisc,3 9,e declaration failed to #rovide as evidence t,e arrest
    and booing records of Lay Sieverding3 'nstead! t,e declaration only statedG
    A. <elevan& an$ ne,essar* re,or$s re"ar$in" @s. )iever$in" /ere prepare$ an$ %ain&aine$ in &he
    ()@) #arran& In'or%a&ion Ce&/ork 2#IC4 an$ Prisoner Pop+la&ion @ana"e%en&3Prisoner Tra,kin"
    )*s&e%s 2PT)4 o' re,or$s.
    +/t @noneG Simulated June 11! -88* &5inute ;rder&! recording a non-e(isting June 11! -88*
    Judge >ates &;rder&! #ur#ortedly signed t,at date3
    9,e docet entry ,as no docet number and no lin to any record3 9,erefore! t,e &5inute ;rder&
    could not #ossibly be aut,enticated! and s,ould be deemed a simulated record3 5oreover! suc,
    &5inute ;rder& #ur#orts to record t,e signing on t,e same date of a Judge >ates &;rder&! but no
    record of t,e &;rder& e(ists in t,e docet and related electronic records3
    /igure 290 Do,ke& o' Sieverding v US Dept of -ustice ! Dk& Pnone ! $o,ke& &ex&, si%+la&in" J+ne 11, 600A
    K@in+&e Or$erK, an$ re,or$in" &he si"nin" o' &he sa%e $a&e o' a non!exis&in" J+ne 11, 600A J+$"e Ba&es
    KOr$erK.
    +/t @noneG Simulated 5arc, 17! -818 Judge >ates &Deave to 7ile Denied& orderG 9,e docet
    entry ,as no docet number and no record is lined to it3 9,e e(cluded record is liely to record
    fraud by 2S agencies in t,is case3 Suc, orders stand in violation of t,e Auman 1ig,t for 7air
    9rial3
    /igure =00 Do,ke& o' Sieverding v US Dept of -ustice ! $o,ke& &ex&, si%+la&in" @ar,h 17, 6010 J+$"e Ba&es
    KFeave &o >ile Denie$K or$er3 One o' several, si%ilar KFeave &o >ile Denie$K 'alse en&ries in &he $o,ke& o' &his
    ,ase 2see also se,&ion 3,34
    +/t @A35G 9,e dis#ositive record in t,is litigation! 5arc, 15! -818 Judge >ates ;rder dismissing
    t,e case! s,o+s no valid signature of t,e 4udge! no seal of t,e court! no attestation by t,e cler of
    t,e court3 P%).1 and )56.)7 - t,e '9 systems of t,e 2S courts s,o+ no valid electronic
    signature3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    50/163 TOC:2
    /igure =10 Sieverding v US Dept of -ustice ! Dk& P77 ! @ar,h 17, 6010 J+$"e Ba&es Or$er $is%issin" &he
    ,ase, &he $isposi&ive j+$i,ial re,or$ in &his ,ase, sho/s no vali$ si"na&+re o' &he j+$"e, no seal o' &he ,o+r&,
    an$ no a&&es&a&ion .* &he ,lerk o' &he ,o+r&. PA-9< an$ -@39->, IT s*s&e%s o' &he () ,o+r&s in,l+$e no
    vali$, visi.le ele,&roni, si"na&+res. 2see also se,&ion 3,34
    +/t @A56G 9,e ;ctober 1*! -818 ;rder of t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! D)! denying t,e a##eal in
    Sieverding v US !ept of 7ustice :18-1*4*)! as doceted in t,e 2S District )ourt file of
    Sieverding v 2S De#t of Justice! s,o+s no signatures of t,e circuit 4udges! no seal of t,e )ourt
    of %##eals! no attestation by t,e cler of t,e )ourt of %##eals3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    51/163 TOC:2
    /igure =20 Sieverding v US Dept of -ustice ! Dk& P7I ! O,&o.er 1A, 6010 KPer uriamK Or$er o' &he ()
    -o+r& o' Appeals, D-, $en*in" &he appeal in Sieverding v US Dept of -ustice! as $o,ke&e$ in &he () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&, D-. The $isposi&ive j+$i,ial re,or$ 'ro% &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, D-, sho/s no na%e o' an* j+$"e,
    no vali$ si"na&+re o' &he ,ir,+i& j+$"es, no seal o' &he -o+r& o' Appeals, an$ no a&&es&a&ion .* &he ,lerk o' &he
    -o+r& o' Appeals. The pra,&i,e o' iss+in" s+,h Per -+ria% $e,isions, /here &he j+$"es re%ain anon*%o+s,
    has "ro/n in 're0+en,* in re,en& *ears, an$ $ra/s ,ri&i,is% .* %e$ia an$ le"al s,holar. PA-9< an$
    -@39->, as i%ple%en&e$ in &he () ,o+r&s o' appeals, like &heir ,o+n&erpar&s in &he () $is&ri,& ,o+r&s, in,l+$e
    no vali$, visi.le ele,&roni, si"na&+res. 2see also se,&ion 3,34
    ;verall! t,e case of Sieverding v US !epartment of 7ustice #rovides detailed evidence of t,e ease
    +it, +,ic, liberty can today be unla+fully de#rived in t,e 2nited States! t,roug, t,e use of an
    invalid net+or of federal +arrant and booing records of federal agencies3 't also #rovides
    detailed evidence of t,e ease +it, +,ic, any attem#t of t,e abused #erson to find remedy in t,e 2S
    courts against suc, #ractices can be deflected t,roug, t,e #ractice of simulated litigation and t,e
    issuance and recording of simulated 4udicial records in P%).1 and )56.)7 - t,e '9 systems of t,e
    2S district courts and 2S courts of a##eals3
    c) 2etsphere %nc et al v- 3aron et al
    /igure ==0 J+$"e <o*al >er"+son, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Cor&hern Dis&ri,& o' Texas..
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    52/163 TOC:2
    Netsphere Inc et al v. Baron et al :3G8*-cv-88*$$) in t,e 2S District )ourt! =ort,ern District of
    9e(as! originated in a contract dis#ute3 9,e litigation commenced +it, t,e issuance of fraudulent!
    invalid summons! and Judge 1oyal 7erguson #resided in t,e case starting 5ay -88* +it, no
    %ssignment ;rder and no aut,ority at all3
    Judge 7erguson #ur#orted to establis, in =ovember -818 an /.( Parte 1eceiver over t,e Person
    and Pro#erty0 of Defendant Jeffrey >aron +it, no foundation in t,e la+3
    Suc, &1eceivers,i#& is in fact ain to slavery3 %nd receivers,i# establis,ed t,roug, an e( #arte
    motion is considered in violation on Due Process rig,ts on its face3
    1egardless of multi#le filings +it, t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! 5t, )ircuit! )ircuit Judges #ermitted
    suc, corru#tion to stand3 Suc, conduct s,ould be deemed e(tra-4udicial conduct! +,ic, is not
    #rotected by any 4udicial immunity3
    1evie+ of t,e records in t,is case s,o+sG B
    c((iii
    C
    +/t @AA1 - 7raudulent summonses +ere issued by t,e ;ffice of t,e )ler Laren 5itc,ell N +it,
    no seal of t,e court! as reIuired by 2S la+3 9,e summons +as not doceted as issued! as
    reIuired by la+! but only under t,e #ur#orted certificate of e(ecution3 B
    c((iv
    C
    +/t @AA3 - Judge 1oyal 7erguson a##ears in t,e case +it, no %ssignment ;rder at al3 B
    c((v
    C
    9,e #ur#orted 1eceiver! %ttorney Peter Kogel! +as a##ointed in =ovember -818 t,roug, an e(
    #arte /.mergency motion for %##ointment of 1eceiver over Jeffrey >aron0 B
    c((vi
    C
    +/t @A5 9,e fraudulent ;rder %##ointing 1eceiver fails to state any section of t,e 2S code as
    t,e legal foundation for t,e a##ointment of a receiver in t,is case3
    9,e fraudulent ;rder %##ointing 1eceiver #ur#orted to give ,im aut,ority over t,e Person and
    %ssets of Defendant Jeff >aron3 9,e notion itself is ain to slavery! +it, no basis in t,e 2S la+3
    =umerous /5otions0! /5inutes0! /;rders0! and /)lerRs =otices of Delivery0 in t,is case +ere
    noted /entered0 in t,e docet of t,is case +it, no docet numbers! and6or +it, no ,y#erlins to
    any electronic records3 Suc, docet notes are o#ined as fraud on t,e court3
    Searc, of t,e )alendar of t,e )ourt for January 1! 1*78 to 5arc, 11! -81-! s,o+ed /=o
    Sc,edule 7ound03 9,erefore! one must conclude t,at ,earings in t,is case +ere conducted &off
    t,e calendar&3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    53/163 TOC:2
    /igure =40 /etsphere $nc et al v0 Baron et al 2380A!,v!00AII4 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Cor&hern Dis&ri,& o'
    Texas8 Invali$ s+%%ons, %issin" &he )eal o' &he -o+r&.
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    54/163 TOC:2
    /igure =20 /etsphere $nc et al v0 Baron et al 2380A!,v!00AII4 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Cor&hern Dis&ri,& o'
    Texas8 >alse $o,ke& no&es /i&h no $o,ke& n+%.ers an$3or /i&h no h*perlinks &o re,or$s.
    >y -81-! t,e case neared its fourt, year! +it, no end in site3 9,e )ivil )over S,eet notes t,e
    original Demand of T75!8883 Ao+ever! by no+! Judge 1oyal 7erguson and ot,ers! ,ave sei"ed t,e
    multimillion dollars cor#orations controlled by t,e Defendant! +it, no legal foundation at all! +,ile
    intimidating ,im under t,e t,reat of force! unla+ful! but credible3
    9,e case as a +,ole s,ould be deemed simulated litigation! e(tortion and raceteering by Judge
    1oyal 7erguson! )ler of t,e )ourt Laren 5itc,ell! %ttorney Peter Kogel and ot,ers involved in t,e
    case3 )onduct of Judge 1oyal 7erguson in t,is case s,ould be deemed e(tra-4udicial activity! and
    t,erefore! +it, no 4udicial immunity at all3
    2#on revie+ of t,e records! a reasonable #erson +ould conclude t,at t,e criminal sc,eme in t,is
    case +as coordinated by t,e Plaintiffs Judge 1oyal 7erguson! )ler of t,e )ourt Laren 5itc,ell!
    %ttorney Peter Kogel! and ot,ers in advance of filing t,e com#laint3
    Netsphere Inc) et al v 7effrey Baron 9:;2::<;= in the US Court of Appeals) >th Circuit B
    c((vii
    C
    =umerous filings +it, t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! 5t, )ircuit! did not #ut an end to t,e alleged
    raceteering in t,e 2S District )ourt in 9e(as3
    %##eal from t,e .( Parte ;rder %##ointing 1eceiver +as filed on December 3! -818! and continues
    to t,is date3 9,e docet of t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals notes numerous ot,er related filings3 B
    c((viii
    C
    9,e 2S )ourt of %##eals ,as no 4urisdiction over simulated orders and 4udgments of t,e 2S
    District )ourt3 9,erefore! all suc, cases in t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! are o#ined as fraud on t,e
    court as +ell3
    1egarding District Judge 1oyal 7urgeson! +,o #retends to a##ear as Presiding Judge in t,e case!
    #a#ers filed in t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals by t,e Defendant Iuote t,e from official transcri#tsG B
    c((i(
    C
    T=9 -O(<T8 Ho+ realize &ha& or$er is an or$er o' &he -o+r&. )o an* 'ail+re &o ,o%pl* /i&h &ha& or$er
    is ,on&e%p&, p+nisha.le .* lo&s o' $ollars, p+nisha.le .* possi.le jail, $ea&h.
    T=9 -O(<T8 The* $o an$ I have j+ris$i,&ion, &oo. )o ILll &ell *o+ /ha&.... Ho+ /an& &o ,hallen"e &he
    ,o+r& or$er, I have &he %arshals .ehin$ %e. I ,an ,o%e &o *o+r ho+se, pi,k *o+ +p, p+& *o+ in jail. I
    ,an seize *o+r proper&*, $o an*&hin" I nee$ &o $o &o en'or,e %* or$ers. IL% &ellin" *o+ $onL& s,re/
    /i&h %e. Ho+ are a 'ool, a 'ool, a 'ool, a 'ool &o s,re/ /i&h a 'e$eral j+$"e, an$ i' *o+ $onL&
    +n$ers&an$ &ha&, I ,an %ake *o+ +n$ers&an$ i&. I have &he 'or,e o' &he Cav*, Ar%*, @arines an$ Cav*
    .ehin$ %e.
    1egarding %ttorney Peter Kogel! +,o #retends to a##ear as 1eceiver bot, in t,e District )ourt and
    in t,e )ourt of %##eals! #a#ers filed in t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals by t,e Defendant noteG B
    c(((
    C
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    55/163 TOC:2
    :A&&orne* Pe&er No"el is a ,ollea"+e o' &he $is&ri,& j+$"e an$ &he &/o .lo" &o"e&her on Garl Ba*erMs
    .lo" si&e.;
    :Pe&er No"el, a& &his %in+&e, is %ar,hin" 'or/ar$, .illin" $ail* in a .illin" 'renz*, a& a ra&e o' al%os&
    Q10,000.00 per $a*.;
    :Pe&er No"el an$ his la/ 'ir% /ere a$verse &o Je'' BaronR li&erall* spe,ialis&s in s+in" hi% 2an$
    On$ova4. The* apparen&l* $evelope$ &his spe,ial&* in viola&ion o' &heir e&hi,al $+&ies R a'&er a,0+irin"
    a&&orne*!,lien& ,on'i$en&ial %a&erial Je'' Baron $is,lose$ &o Pe&er No"el in 6001.;
    1egardless! t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals continues to #atroni"e t,e conduct of t,e 2S District )ourt in
    t,is caseG
    ;n December $! -818! )ircuit Judges Patric Aigginbot,am! Jerry . Smit,! and )at,arina
    Aaynes! denied >aronRs initial 5otion for Stay #ending %##eal! in an unsigned order! +,ic,
    bears no stam# of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt3
    ;n December -8! -818! )ircuit Judges Aigginbot,am and Jerry . Smit, denied a re#eat 5otion
    to Stay! again in an unsigned order! +,ic, bears no stam# of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt! accom#anied
    by a misled /5emorandum to )ounsel0 by )ler of t,e )ourt Dyle H )ayce3
    d) Case of 3orro(er Dianne 4ill
    /igure =@0 The ,ases o' Borro1er Dianne Hill, Borro1er William Parsley, an$ Zernik v onnor et al
    $o,+%en& &he ,en&ral role o' 'ra+$ an$ ,orr+p&ion in &he () ,o+r&s in %a&&ers per&ainin" &o 'inan,ial
    ins&i&+&ions in &he er+p&ion o' &he on"oin" 'inan,ial ,risis. The ,ollapse o' -o+n&r*/i$e >inan,ial -orpora&ion
    on Jan+ar* I, 600I, /as ,a+se$ .* &he p+.li,a&ion in &he Ce/ Hork Ti%es o' &he 'ra+$ perpe&ra&e$ .*
    -o+n&r*/i$e in &he li&i"a&ion o' &he ,ase o' Borro1er Dianne Hill. The li&i"a&ion pra,&i,es o' -o+n&r*/i$eLs
    Fe"al Depar&%en&, &hen le$ .* )an$or )a%+els, -o+n&r*/i$eLs -hie' Fe"al O''i,er 2la&er Asso,ia&e Beneral
    -o+nsel o' Bank o' A%eri,a4 /ere also re.+ke$ in &he ,ase o' Borro/er William Prasley. <e"ar$less, none
    o' &he senior -o+n&r*/i$e exe,+&ives 'a,e$ an* ,onse0+en,es. #i&h i&, i& /as %a$e ,lear &ha& .anks are
    &o$a* a.ove &he la/ in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, an$ &ha& &here is no reason &o .elieve &ha& hones& an$ e''e,&ive
    Bankin" <e"+la&ion /o+l$ .e res&ore$ an*&i%e soon.
    9,e #ublication on January $! -88$ by Pulit"er-#ri"e +inner! =e+ ?or 9imes senior business
    columnist @retc,en 5orgenson of fraud by )ountry+ide in t,e case of Borroer !ianne "ill! :81-
    --574) in t,e 2S >anru#tcy )ourt! .astern District of Pennsylvania! +as a ey event in t,e
    ongoing financial crisis3 9,e re#ort detailed t,e filing by )ountry+ide of &recreated letters& as
    evidenceG B
    c(((i
    C
    The -o+n&r*/i$e >inan,ial -orpora&ion 'a.ri,a&e$ $o,+%en&s rela&e$ &o &he .ankr+p&,* ,ase o' a
    Penns*lvania ho%eo/ner, ,o+r& re,or$s sho/, raisin" ne/ 0+es&ions a.o+& &he .+siness pra,&i,es o'
    &he "ian& %or&"a"e len$er a& &he ,en&er o' &he s+.pri%e %ess.
    't s,ould be noted t,atG
    9,e t,ree letters in Iuestion +ere filed by outside attorneys for )ountry+ide! most liely not
    aut,ori"ed as )ounsel of 1ecord in t,e case :see sections )1,3 )-e)3
    9,e letters bear no form of valid signature3
    9,e letters come +it, no aut,entication at all! and t,e #erson! +,o is listed +riter on t,e faces of
    t,e letters! is yet anot,er outside counsel3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    56/163 TOC:2
    /igure =A0 One o' &hree K<e,rea&e$ Fe&&ersK, 'ile$ .* -o+n&r*/i$e in &he ,ase o' Borro1er Dianne Hill. The
    le&&ers .ear no vali$ si"na&+re an$ ,a%e /i&h no vali$ a+&hen&i,a&ion. Their ori"in is no& in -o+n&r*/i$e ei!
    &her, .+& 'ro% an o+&si$e ,o+nsel. The p+.li,a&ion o' &he 'ilin" o' &he K<e,rea&e$ Fe&&ersK in &he Ce/ Hork
    Ti%es ,a+se$ &he ,ollapse o' -o+n&r*/i$e, an$ /as one o' &he ke* even&s in &he 'inan,ial ,risis.
    Hit,in ,ours! t,e )ountry+ide stoc colla#sed and t,reatened to tae t,e entire stoc maret +it,
    it3 9rading ,ad to be sto##ed3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    57/163 TOC:2
    % fe+ days later! under #ressure by senior officers of t,e 2S government! >an of %merica
    )or#oration agreed to &merge& +it, )ountry+ide! under terms t,at could not #ossibly reflect a
    reasonable business decision3
    1egardless! none of t,ose involved in t,is blatant fraud in t,e 2S court faced any conseIuences3
    e) Case of 5illiam /arsle
    /igure =B0 The ,ases o' Borro1er Dianne Hill, Borro1er William Parsley, an$ Zernik v
    onnor et al $o,+%en& &he ,en&ral role o' 'ra+$ an$ ,orr+p&ion in &he () ,o+r&s in %a&&ers per&ainin" &o
    'inan,ial ins&i&+&ions in &he er+p&ion o' &he on"oin" 'inan,ial ,risis. The ,ollapse o' -o+n&r*/i$e >inan,ial
    -orpora&ion on Jan+ar* I, 600I, /as ,a+se$ .* &he p+.li,a&ion in &he Ce/ Hork Ti%es o' &he 'ra+$
    perpe&ra&e$ .* -o+n&r*/i$e in &he li&i"a&ion o' &he ,ase o' Borro1er Dianne Hill. The li&i"a&ion pra,&i,es o'
    -o+n&r*/i$eLs Fe"al Depar&%en&, &hen le$ .* )an$or )a%+els, -o+n&r*/i$eLs -hie' Fe"al O''i,er 2la&er
    Asso,ia&e Beneral -o+nsel o' Bank o' A%eri,a4 /ere also re.+ke$ in &he ,ase o' Borro/er William Prasley.
    <e"ar$less, none o' &he senior -o+n&r*/i$e exe,+&ives 'a,e$ an* ,onse0+en,es. #i&h i&, i& /as %a$e ,lear
    &ha& .anks are &o$a* a.ove &he la/ in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, an$ &ha& &here is no reason &o .elieve &ha& hones&
    an$ e''e,&ive Bankin" <e"+la&ion /o+l$ .e res&ore$ an*&i%e soon.
    ;n 5arc, 5! -88$! 2S Judge Jeff >o,m entered a 5emorandum ;#inion in t,e case of Borroer
    #illiam $arsley :85-*8374) in t,e 2S >anru#tcy )ourt! Sout,ern District of 9e(as3 B
    c(((ii
    C 9,e
    5emorandum ;#inion +as based on evidence in t,e same case! as +ell as a year-long study by t,e
    2S 9rustee ;ffice of )ountry+ideEs litigation #ractices in t,e 2S courts t,roug,out t,e 2nited
    States3
    9,e 5emorandum ;#inion detailed various fraudulent #ractices of )ountry+ide! its Degal
    De#artment and its outside attorneys in t,e 2S courts! first and foremost among t,em - t,e
    a##earance of outside attorneys on be,alf of )ountry+ide! +,o +ere not aut,ori"ed as )ounsel of
    1ecord! +it, &no communications +it, client clause&3
    =o suc, a##earances of unaut,ori"ed counsel s,ould ,ave been #ossible! ,ad t,e docets of t,e 2S
    courts been managed by aut,ori"ed clers #ursuant to 2S la+3 >ut under P%).1 and )56.)7!
    attorneys can a##ear and file #a#ers on be,alf of #arties +it, no #rior revie+ by t,e cler of t,e
    court3
    1egardless of t,e enormous fraud on t,e courts by )ountry+ide and its attorneys! +,ic, +as
    documented in t,e case of Borroer $arsley! none of t,e #er#etrators suffered any conseIuences!
    and none of t,e victims +as #rovided +it, any remedies3
    9,e case is of #articular significance! since it +as +idely re#orted by 2S media3 9,e #ublication
    too #lace during t,e #eriod of due diligence by >an of %merica )or#oration! relative to t,e
    &merger& +it, )ountry+ide 7inancial )or#oration3 Hit, it! it became clear t,at >an of %merica
    )or#oration +as fully a+are of t,e substantial criminal liabilities involved in suc, &merger&3
    9,erefore! one must conclude t,at in t,e conte(t of suc, &merger&! affected under #ressure by t,e
    most senior 2S officers! >an of %merica )or#oration reac,ed some agreement on immunities
    from criminal #rosecution! relative to various ty#es of financial institution fraud3 Hit, it! >an of
    %merica )or#oration +as #laced above t,e la+ - status t,at is evident to t,is date in t,e numerous
    &settlements& +it, t,e 2S government of financial institution fraud of un#recedented sco#e on its
    customers! stoc,older and t,e 2S ta( #ayer3 B
    c(((iii
    C 9,e fraud victims in suc, cases +ere never
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    58/163 TOC:2
    com#ensated and +ere never #rovided by any remedy3 Suc, &settlements& +ere described by media
    as &bribes& to t,e 2S government3
    ;ne must not conclude t,at t,e #ractices! recorded in t,e )ase of >orro+er Parsley! +ere
    terminated after t,eir #ublication3 ;n t,e contrary! t,e 7raud on t,e )ourt t,roug, a##earances of
    unaut,ori"ed counsel! +,ic, +as ty#ical of )ountry+ide! became a routine feature of t,e conduct
    of >an of %merica! after its merger +it, )ountry+ide3 B
    c(((iv
    C
    f) 6erni! v Connor et al 7,SDS C$CD)
    /igure =90 The ,ases o' Borro1er Dianne Hill, Borro1er William Parsley, an$ Zernik v onnor et al
    $o,+%en& &he ,en&ral role o' 'ra+$ an$ ,orr+p&ion in &he () ,o+r&s in %a&&ers per&ainin" &o 'inan,ial
    ins&i&+&ions in &he er+p&ion o' &he on"oin" 'inan,ial ,risis. The ,ollapse o' -o+n&r*/i$e >inan,ial -orpora&ion
    on Jan+ar* I, 600I, /as ,a+se$ .* &he p+.li,a&ion in &he Ce/ Hork Ti%es o' &he 'ra+$ perpe&ra&e$ .*
    -o+n&r*/i$e in &he li&i"a&ion o' &he ,ase o' Borro1er Dianne Hill. The li&i"a&ion pra,&i,es o' -o+n&r*/i$eLs
    Fe"al Depar&%en&, &hen le$ .* )an$or )a%+els, -o+n&r*/i$eLs -hie' Fe"al O''i,er 2la&er Asso,ia&e Beneral
    -o+nsel o' Bank o' A%eri,a4 /ere also re.+ke$ in &he ,ase o' Borro/er William Prasley. <e"ar$less, none
    o' &he senior -o+n&r*/i$e exe,+&ives 'a,e$ an* ,onse0+en,es. #i&h i&, i& /as %a$e ,lear &ha& .anks are
    &o$a* a.ove &he la/ in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, an$ &ha& &here is no reason &o .elieve &ha& hones& an$ e''e,&ive
    Bankin" <e"+la&ion /o+l$ .e res&ore$ an*&i%e soon.
    'n %erni& v Connor et al :-G8$-cv-81558) in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia!
    Ferni filed a com#laint under t,e cause of action of De#rivation of 1ig,ts under t,e )olor of Da+
    against a grou# of 4udges! clers! and )ountry+ide officers! regarding t,eir conduct in t,e
    underlying case Samaan v %erni& :S)8$7488) in t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! )ounty of Dos
    %ngeles3 7rom -885 to -818! Judge JacIueline )onnor! )ler of t,e )ourt Jo,n % )lare! and
    ot,ers at t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! )ounty of Dos %ngeles! sub4ected Dr Jose#, Ferni to
    real-estate litigation at t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! )ounty of Dos %ngeles! +,ere ,e +as
    named t,e Defendant3 9,e case culminated in t,e taing of Dr FerniRs ,ome for #rivate use! under
    t,e t,reat of force by %ttorney David Pasterna! former President of t,e Dos %ngeles >ar!
    #ur#orting to act on be,alf and by aut,ority of t,e )alifornia Su#erior )ourt3
    1egarding conduct of Pasterna! acting in collusion +it, t,e Dos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt! James
    Hedic! one of t,e best no+n fraud e(#erts in t,e 2S! and a ,ig,ly decorated 7>' veteran! o#ined
    /U fraud being committedU0 and /333investigation s,ould be immediately institutedU0 B
    c(((v
    C
    Samaan v %erni& documented #ractices t,at s,ould be deemed raceteering by )alifornia 4udges
    and clers in collusion +it, financial institutions3 Simulated litigation +as conducted +it, no valid
    4udicial records at all3 9,e conduct is best detailed in t,e %mended )om#laint in %erni& v Connor
    et al in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia3 B
    c(((vi
    C
    9,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia refused to #rovide .Iual Protection under t,e
    Da+! and engaged in t,e very same conduct - simulated litigation3
    Per,a#s t,e best evidence for t,e fraudulent nature of t,e entire court file and records in %erni& v
    Connor et al in t,e 2S District )ourt case comes from Dr FerniEs corres#ondence +it, )ler of
    t,e )ourt 9erry =afisi in t,is matter :see section @-a)3 9,e corres#ondence #ertained to t,e denial
    of access to records and refusal of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt 9erry =afisi to ans+er on validity and
    integrity of t,e docet and records in t,is case3 Aars, retaliation against Dr Ferni follo+ed ,is
    re#eat attem#ts to access t,e records and document t,eir fallacy3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    59/163 TOC:2
    9,e case of %erni& v Connor et al ,olds #articular significance for t+o reasonsG
    't #roduced voluminous records of t,e direct involvement of senior )ountry+ide and >an of
    %merica senior e(ecutives in t,e fraud in t,e courtsG %ngelo 5o"ilo! Sandor Samuels! >rian
    5oyni,an3 B
    c(((vii
    C
    't s,eds lig,t on a matter t,at +as sub4ect of intense national interest and investigations! +,ic,
    #ur#orted to lead to no conclusion - t,e ouster on December 18! -88$ of >an of %merica
    @eneral )ounsel 9imot,y 5ayo#oulos in t,e midst of t,e &merger& negotiations of 5errill
    Dync, and >an of %merica3
    'n Samaan v %erni& in t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia >ryan )ave DDP! one of t,e largest la+-
    firms in t,e 2S engaged in ,arassment! intimidation and retaliation against Ferni! #ur#orting to
    a##ear on be,alf of )ountry+id3 Die+ise! t,e >ryan )ave DDP #ur#orted to a##ear on be,alf of
    >an of %merica in %erni& v Connor in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia3
    Ao+ever! and Ferni! +,o +as a+are of t,e case of Borroer $arsley) reali"ed t,at >ryan )ave
    DDP +as unaut,ori"ed to a##ear on be,alf of eit,er cor#oration! and often communicated directly
    +it, t,e Degal De#artment of )ountry+ide and t,e office of @eneral )ounsel of >an of %merica3
    9,roug, suc, communications it became a##arent t,at )ountry+ide ),ief Degal ;fficer Sandor
    Samuels +as directly involved in t,e unaut,ori"ed and unla+ful conduct of >ryan )ave DDP3
    Ao+ever! follo+ing t,e colla#se of )ountry+ide on January $! -88$! and t,e &merger& of
    )ountry+ide +it, >an of %merica on July 1! -88$! +,en Sandor Samuels became accountable to
    5r 9imot,y 5ayo#oulos! >ryan )ave sto##ed its ,arassment! intimidation! and retaliation3
    Ao+ever! on December 18! -88$! 5r 9imot,y 5ayo#oulos +as summarily dismissed as @eneral
    )ounsel of >an of %merica and +as escorted out of t,e >of% ,eadIuarters by security in t,e midst
    of negotiation of t,e >of% &merger& +it, 5errill Dync,3 >rian 5oyni,an! +it, little or no
    e(#erience in t,e #ractice of t,e la+ +as immediately a##ointed as ,is successor3
    9,e matter +as later sub4ect of #robes by t,e 2S )ongress! by =e+ ?or %ttorney @eneral %ndre+
    )uomo! and by t,e 2S District )ourt in =e+ ?or3 %ll of t,ese #robes seemed to lead no+,ere3
    'n contrast! t,e evidence from Samaan v %erni& and %erni& v Connor et al s,o+s t,at +it,in -4
    ,ours after 5ayo#oulosEs dismissal and 5oyni,anEs a##ointment in December -88$! >rian )ave
    DDP resumed its unla+ful conduct3
    9,erefore! one can conclude t,at t,e abru#t dismissal of 5ayo#oulos and ,is re#lacement by
    5oyni,an +as related to t,e refusal of 5ayo#oulos to #ermit certain unla+ful conduct in >an of
    %merica! favored by #ersons suc, as Sandor Samuels! t,en %ssociate @eneral )ounsel of >an of
    %merica3 Die+ise! one can conclude t,at >rian 5oyni,an +as rece#tive and conducive to suc,
    unla+ful conduct3
    %lso of note is t,e fact t,at regardless of t,e detailed evidence of criminality by senior baning
    e(ecutives! and regardless of )ongressional 'nIuiry by Senator Diane 7einstein! all baning
    regulators refused to address com#laints in t,is matter3 B
    c(((viii
    C
    Die+ise! 2S De#t of Justice and 7>' refused to investigate t,e matter3 B
    c(((i(
    C
    %bove all! t,e case documents in t,e greatest detail t,e collusion of 2S 4udges in t,e a##arent
    criminality of financial institutions in t,e center of t,e financial crisis :see section @-a)3
    N(Fs in %erni& v Connor et al
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    60/163 TOC:2
    /igure 400 Zernik v onnor et8 C9> o' Dk& PA8 Co&i,e o' <eassi"n%en& &o () J+$"e
    Nir"inia Phillips. The C9> in,l+$es no K9le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK, an$ &here'ore, &he respe,&ive re,or$ !
    Co&i,e o' <eassi"n%en& ! is invali$, an$ J+$"e Nir"inia Phillips /as a,&in" /i&h no a+&hori&* a& all.
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    61/163 TOC:2
    /igure 410 Zernik v onnor et8 C9> o' Dk& P1078 J+$"%en& .* J+$"e Nir"inia Phillips. The C9> in,l+$es no
    K9le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK, an$ &here'ore, &he respe,&ive re,or$ ! J+$"%en& is voi$, no& voi$a.le.
    9,e =.7s of t,e litigation in %erni& v Connor et al +ere discovered at a muc, later time! on
    December -*! -88*! after mont,s t,at access to records +as denied3
    9,e =.7s #rovided t,e definitive evidence of litigation in t,e 2S District )ourt! +,ic, +as
    conducted as a simulated litigation from start to finis, :see also section @-a)G
    i3 =one of t,e reIuested =.7s contained a com#lete &.lectronic Document Stam#&3
    ii3 ;f t,e -4 =.7s! +,ic, +ere discovered! $ +ere found to include truncated &.lectronic
    Document Stam#&3
    iii3 =.7s for t,e follo+ing critical records included no &.lectronic Document Stam#& at allG
    - 'ssuance of Summonses!
    - %ssignments and 1eassignments to Judges
    - %ssignments and 1eassignments to 5agistrates
    - %ll 5inutes +,ic, +ere e(amined3
    - ;rder Denying DisIualification for a )ause
    - =otice and 1e#ort and 1ecommendation by 5agistrate3
    - ;rder %do#ting 1e#ort and 1ecommendation by Judge
    - Judgment by Judge3
    ;f interest! t,e com#laint in %erni& v Connor et al) under t,e cause of action of De#rivation of
    1ig,ts under t,e )olor of Da+ originated from e(actly t,e same conduct in t,e Su#erior )ourt of
    )alifornia! )ounty of Dos %ngeles3 9,e conduct is detailed in t,e 7irst %mended )om#laint in
    %erni& v Connor et al3 B
    c(l
    C
    'n t,e )alifornia court! Sustain! t,e '9 system of t,e Su#erior )ourt +as em#loyed for t,e e(act
    same #ur#ose as P%).1 and )56.)7 in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia3 'n
    t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! 4udges a##eared +it, no valid assignment orders eit,er! and issued
    minutes! orders! and 4udgments! +,ic, +ere invalid in various +ays! from lac of aut,entication! to
    running ,earings off t,e calendar of t,e court3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    62/163 TOC:2
    't is believed t,at t,e conduct of simulated litigation is t,e most common #attern of 4udicial
    corru#tion in t,e 2S and beyond3
    g) 6erni! v 0elson et al B
    c(li
    C
    /igure 420 >ro% le'& &o ri"h&8 Genne&h @elson 2&hen Dire,&or o' () A&&orne*s O''i,e, () Depar&%en& o'
    J+s&i,e4, Genne&h Gaiser 2>BI Assis&an& Dire,&or, -ri%inal Inves&i"a&ions4, () J+$"e <i,har$ Feon, ()
    Dis&ri,& -o+r&, D-. @elson an$ Gaiser /ere na%e$ a%on" De'en$an&s in Zernik v "elson et al, pe&i&ion &o
    -o%pel () O''i,er &o Per'or% =is D+&ies. The pe&i&ion $o,+%en&e$ &he ,en&ral role o' @elson an$ Gaiser in
    a,,or$in" 'inan,ial ins&i&+&ions i%%+ni&* a"ains& ,ri%inali&* +n$er &he on"oin" 'inan,ial ,risis. () J+$"e
    <i,har$ Feon o.s&r+,&e$ j+s&i,e &hro+"h &he perversion o' li&i"a&ion in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r& 2see also se,&ion
    AB-4.
    'n %erni& v 'elson et al :1G8*-cv-88$85) in t,e 2S )ourt! District of )olumbia!
    pro se Plaintiff filed a Petition for a #rit of 'andamus to Compel US -fficer to $erform "is
    !uties! -$ 2S) J13613 9,e #etition #ertained to refusal of 7>' and 2S De#artment of Justice to
    #rotect t,e rig,ts of 18 million residents of Dos %ngeles )ounty! )alifornia! in vie+ of indis#utable
    evidence of raceteering by 4udges of t,e Dos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt3 B
    c(lii
    C
    9,e case is of #articular interest! since it #rovides direct evidence of t,e tig,t lins bet+een
    corru#tion of t,e 4udiciary! corru#tion of financial institutions :)ountry+ide and >an of %merica
    in t,is case)! and #atroni"ing of t,e same by 7>' and 2S De#artment of Justice3 )orru#tion of t,e
    2S 4ustice system is a central cause of t,e current financial crisis! +,ic, is often overlooed3B
    c(liii
    C
    9,e #etition #ertained to allegations of long-term! +ides#read corru#tion of t,e 4udiciary in Dos
    %ngeles )ounty! )alifornia! and refusal of 7>' and 2S De#artment of Justice to #rotect t,e Auman!
    )onstitutional! and )ivil 1ig,ts of residents of t,at region of t,e 2S%3 B
    c(liv
    C
    9,e evidence of raceteering by Judges of t,e Dos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt is indis#utableG
    1etroactive immunities :/#ardons0) +ere signed for all 4udges and commissioners of t,e Su#erior
    )ourt of )alifornia! )ounty of Dos %ngeles )ounty! )alifornia! +,o ,ad taen /not
    #ermitted0#ayments :/bribes0)3 B
    c(lv
    C
    2nited =ations Auman 1ig,ts )ouncil :A1)) issued an official Staff 1e#ort referring to
    /corru#tion of t,e courts and t,e legal #rofession and discrimination by la+ enforcement in
    )alifornia03 B
    c(lvi
    C 9,e re#ort +as based on evidence submitted to t,e A1) of large-scale false
    im#risonments and financial6real estate fraud by 4udges of t,e )ourt3
    Darge-scale fraud +as o#ined in Sustain! t,e case management system of t,e Dos %ngeles
    Su#erior )ourt! +,ic, enables t,e conduct of simulated litigation of cases in violation of t,e la+3
    9,e o#inion +as su##orted by o#inion of international com#uter science sc,olar3 B
    c(lvii
    C
    7raud +as o#ined in t,e case management system of t,e Dos %ngeles S,eriffRs De#artment!
    +,ic, enables large-scale false im#risonments! +it, no legal foundation3 9,e o#inion +as
    revie+ed and #ublis,ed in an international com#uter science 4ournal +it, an .ditorial >oard
    listing sc,olars from si( .uro#ean nations and )anada3 B
    c(lviii
    C
    7inancial institutions are t,e beneficiaries! and 7>' and 2S De#artment of Justice are t,e #atronsG
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    63/163 TOC:2
    9,e t+o 2S officers of t,e 2S De#artment of Justice! +,o +ere named first among 1es#ondents
    +ereG
    Director of 2S %ttorneys ;ffice Lennet, 5elson! and
    %ssistant Director of 7>' for )riminal 'nvestigations Lennet, Laiser3
    ;t,er named among 1es#ondents includedG
    S.) officers and
    >an of %merica )or#oration e(ecutives3
    Ley #art of t,e evidence #ertained to fraud by >an of %merica and )ountry+ide in t,e courts in
    Dos %ngeles )ounty! )alifornia! and beyond! even #rior to t,e current financial crisis3 B
    c(li(
    C
    >rief ),ronology of Ferni v 5elson et alG B
    cl
    C
    9,e case +as assigned to 2S Judge 1')A%1D D.;=! +,o engaged in fraud t,roug, t,e conduct
    of simulated litigation in collusion +it, t,e )ler of t,e )ourt =ancy 5ayer-H,ittington in
    disregard of 7irst %mendment and Due Process rig,tsG
    Com$laint (+/t @A#) B
    cli
    C N ty#ically t,e com#laint is a s,ort document3 Aere t,e com#laint is
    voluminous! since it included substantial #art of t,e evidence3 >ased on PetitionerRs #rior
    e(#erience in t,e 2S courts! it +as liely t,at furt,er evidence +ould be e(cluded from t,e
    docet3 7iling t,e evidence +it, t,e )om#laint ensured its entry into t,e #ublic record3
    Summonses (+/t @none) N +ere not doceted! in a##arent violation of t,e
    7ederal 1ules of )ivil Procedure! setting t,e litigation as Simulated Ditigation from t,e start3
    7otion for C7BEC. 9ass8or& (+/t @A%) B
    clii
    C N filed toget,er +it, t,e com#laint3 Denial of
    access to electronic filing by pro se #laintiffs enables t,e abuse of rig,ts3 %ccess to t,e electronic
    aut,entication records :=.7s) in t,is case is denied to t,is date3
    Statement of +isCualification of -u&ge :eon (+/t @A0) B
    cliii
    C and 5otion to )om#el 7>' and
    2S De#artment of Justice to #rovide t,e t,en im#risoned 1ic,ard 7ine #en and #a#er :Dt Q4)
    B
    cliv
    C N t,e t+o records +ere included in t,e docet only after #rotests #ertaining to dis,onest
    conduct of t,e court3 :see! belo+)3
    7ormer 2S Prosecutor 1ic,ard 7ine +as at t,at time ,eld in solitary confinement +it, no valid
    legal #a#ers for ,is arrest and im#risonment3 Ae +as denied access to #en and #a#er! in effort to
    #revent ,im from filing ,is ,abeas cor#us #etition3 7ine ,ad e(#osed and rebued t,e taing by
    Dos %ngeles 4udges of /not #ermitted0 #ayments :/bribes0)! +,ic, reIuired t,e signing of
    /retroactive immunities0:/#ardons0) for all suc, 4udges3 B
    clv
    C
    Evi&ence of Corru$tion of the Courts in Cases *nvolving Countr8i&e an& "an/ of
    America (+/t @none) B
    clvi
    C N eig,t :$) records +ere duly filed on 5ay -1! -88*3 Judge Deon
    ,eld t,e#a#ers in c,ambers and refused to #ermit t,eir doceting3
    ReCuest for Revie8 of Con&uct of the Cler/ (+/t @3) B
    clvii
    C and 1eIuest for statement on t,e
    record by Judge Deon and )ler 5ayer-H,ittington :Dt Q6) B
    clviii
    C D +ere filed in #rotest of
    denial of rig,t to file #a#ers in court3
    7emoran&um O$inion an& Or&er b -u&ge Richar& :eon (+/t @5'6) B
    cli(
    !
    cl(
    C
    D +ere mailed +it, no aut,entication :=.7 N notice of electronic filing) and t,erefore cannot be
    deemed valid court records :see belo+)3
    E:eave to .ile +enie&F (+/t @none) N later! Petitioner received by mail t,e face #ages of ,is
    eig,t #a#ers! +,ic, +ere never doceted! +it, ,and inscri#tions /Deave to file denied! 1JD03
    B
    cl(i
    C
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    64/163 TOC:2
    ReCuest for Authentication Recor&s (NE.s) (+/t @ ;) B
    cl(ii
    C D Judge Deon never ruled on t,e
    reIuest! and access to t,e aut,entication records ,as been denied to t,is date3
    't s,ould be noted t,at Judge Deon and )ler 5ayer-H,ittington engaged in t,e same conduct in a
    case #ertaining to Judge ;linda .vans! 2S )ourt! =ort,ern District of @eorgia3 'n #indsor v (vans
    et al :1G18-cv-881*7) in t,e 2S )ourt! District of )olumbia! pro se Plaintiff Hilliam Hindsor filed
    com#laint under cause of actions of
    !eprivation of *ights under the Color of La! 4- 2S)J1*$3! #ertaining to conduct of 2S Judge
    ;linda .vans of t,e 2S District )ourt! =ort,ern District of @eorgia3 B
    cl(iii
    C 9,e case is of #articular
    interest! since it #rovides evidence of cover u# of 4udicial corru#tion! not only by Judge 1ic,ard
    Deon in t,e 2S District )ourt in Has,ington D)! but also by t,e 2S courts of a##eals and t,e 2S
    Su#reme )ourt3 B
    cl(iv
    C 9,e evidence s,o+s t,at in obstructing 4ustice! Judge Deon and )ler 5ayer-
    H,ittington engaged in t,e e(act same conduct in #indsor v (vans et al B
    cl(v
    C and in %erni& v
    'elson et al D denial of t,e rig,t to file #a#ers in t,e court3
    'nvalid '9 systems of t,e 2S courts :P%).1 and )56.)7) are germane to suc, conduct in t,e 2S
    courts3 9,e P%).1 docet and ot,er re#orts in %erni& v 'elson et al #rovide additional evidence
    of t,e conduct of Simulated DitigationG B
    cl(vi
    C
    =o event is listed in t,e )alendar of t,e )ourt!
    =o Judgment is listed in t,e Judgment 'nde( of t,e )ourt!
    9,e Petition is not listed as /terminated0 in t,e 1elated 9ransaction 1e#ort! alt,oug, t,e case is
    listed as closed3
    9,e cases of %erni& v 'elson et al and #indsor v (vans et al s,o+ t,at 2S 4udges are not ready!
    +illing! able to address corru#tion of t,e state and 2S 4udges3
    9,e case of %erni& v 'elson et al! #indsor v (vans et al and ot,er similar cases in t,e 2S district
    courts! 2S courts of a##eals! and Su#reme )ourt of t,e 2nited States document t,at t,e 2S courts
    ,ave effectively establis,ed a #olicy! #ro,ibiting t,e filing of #a#ers! +,ic, document 4udicial
    corru#tion3 B
    cl(vii
    C
    h) Securities and )&change Commission v 3an! of $merica Corporation >
    clxviii
    '
    clxix
    ?
    /igure 4=0 >ro% le'& &o ri"h&8 Flo*$ Blank'ein, ,hie' exe,+&ive o' Bol$%an )a,hs5 Ja%ie Di%on, ,hie'
    exe,+&ive o' JP @or"an -hase5 John @a,k, ,hair%an o' @or"an )&anle*5 an$ Brian @o*nihan, ,hie'
    exe,+&ive o' Bank o' A%eri,a, s/orn in .e'ore &he >inan,ial -risis In0+ir* -o%%ission, Jan+ar* 13, 6010,
    an$ () J+$"e Je$ <ako'', )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' Ce/ Hork. The evi$en,e in$i,a&es &ha& J+$"e <ako'', )9-
    an$ Bank o' A%eri,a ,oll+$e$ in &he ,on$+,& o' si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion in a lan$%ark ,ase +n$er &he ,+rren&
    'inan,ial ,risis.
    Al&ho+"h >BI Dire,&or <o.er& @+eller III repea&e$l* &es&i'ie$ .e'ore &he )ena&e &ha& i& /as inves&i"a&in"
    ,ri%inali&* +n$erl*in" &he s+.!pri%e ,risis, D
    ,lxx
    ,
    ,lxxi
    E no prose,+&ion o' &op 'i"+re ever res+l&e$ 'ro% s+,h
    inves&i"a&ions. In ,on&ras&, inves&i"a&ion o' Ce/ Hork )&a&e A&&orne* Beneral An$re/ -+o%o +n,overe$
    .la&an& ,ri%inali&* o' &op 'i"+res in Bank o' A%eri,a in ,oll+sion /i&h &op () o''i,ers ! -hair%an o' &he >e$eral
    <eserve Ben Bernanke, Treas+r* )e,re&ar* =enr* Pa+lson. D
    ,lxxii
    E The )ena&e )+.,o%%i&&ee on
    Inves&i"a&ions repor& on &he 'inan,ial ,risis, like/ise, $o,+%en&e$ vas& ,ri%inali&* in 'inan,ial ins&i&+&ions.
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    65/163 TOC:2
    D
    ,lxxiii
    ,
    ,lxxiv
    E <e"ar$less, no &op 'i"+re in len$in" ins&i&+&ions has .een ,ri%inall* prose,+&e$. D
    ,lxxv
    E 9ven&+all*, in
    6013 A&&orne* Beneral 9ri, =ol$er ,onsen&e$ .e'ore &he )ena&e J+$i,iar* -o%%i&&ee &ha& &here /as
    ,ri%inali&* +n$erl*in" &he ,risis, .+& in &es&i%on* &ha& /as la&er re'erre$ &o as K&oo .i" &o 'ail, &o .i" &o jailK,
    ,lai%e$ &ha& prose,+&in" .ankin" exe,+&ives /as no& possi.le. D
    ,lxxvi
    ,
    ,lxxvii
    E As $o,+%en&e$ here in &he
    li&i"a&ion o' Securities and )2change ommission v Bank of America orporation 2an$ in o&her ,ases
    o+&line$ in linke$ re'eren,es4 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' Ce/ Hork, li&i"a&ion o' .ankin"!
    rela&e$ %a&&ers /as +n$er%ine$ &hro+"h ,oll+sion in 'ra+$ on &he ,o+r& .* j+$"e, ,lerk, an$ ,o+nsel 'or .o&h
    par&ies, /hile %e$ia 'aile$ &o a$e0+a&el* repor& on /ha& &ranspire$ in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r& in Ce/ Hork.
    S(C v BAC :1G8*-cv-86$-*)! and t,e related case of S(C v BAC :1G18-cv N88-15) in t,e 2S
    District )ourt! Sout,ern District of =e+ ?or! +ere summed as follo+s in t,e 7air 7und
    %dministrator +ebsiteG
    The (ni&e$ )&a&es )e,+ri&ies an$ 9x,han"e -o%%ission 2:)9-;4 'ile$ en'or,e%en& a,&ions a"ains&
    Bank o' A%eri,a -orpora&ion 2:BA-;4 alle"in" &ha& BA- viola&e$ &he 'e$eral prox* re"+la&ions in &he
    %er"er .e&/een BA- an$ @errill F*n,h S -o., In,. 2:@errill;4 &ha& ,lose$ on Jan+ar* 1, 600A. As par& o'
    a se&&le%en& o' &hose a,&ions approve$ .* &he =onora.le Je$ ). <ako'' o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es Dis&ri,&
    -o+r& 'or &he )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' Ce/ Hork on >e.r+ar* 66, 6010, BA- pai$ approxi%a&el* Q170
    %illion in&o a >air >+n$ &ha& /ill .e $is&ri.+&e$ &o inves&ors inj+re$ .* &he alle"e$ %is,on$+,&.
    >ollo/in" BA-Ms %er"er /i&h @errill, &he )9- 'ile$ &/o a,&ions, )9- v . Bank o' A%eri,a -orp., 0A!,v
    !?I6A 2J)<4 2:Bon+ses A,&ion;4 an$ )9- v . Bank o' A%eri,a -orp., 10!,v !061 7 2J)<4 2:T4 Fosses
    A,&ion;4 2,olle,&ivel* , &he :A,&ions;4. In &he Bon+ses A,&ion, ini&iall* 'ile$ on A+"+s& 3, 600A, &he )9-
    ,har"e$ BA- /i&h viola&in" )e,&ion 142a4 o' &he )e,+ri&ies 9x,han"e A,& o' 1A34 2:9x,han"e A,&;4 an$
    <+les 14a!3 an$ 14a!A &here+n$er .ase$ on BA-Ms 'ail+re &o $is,lose, in prox* %a&erials soli,i&in"
    sharehol$er vo&es 'or approval o' &he %er"er, i&s a+&horiza&ion 'or @errill &o pa* *ear!en$ .on+ses o' +p
    &o Q7.I .illion &o i&s e%plo*ees prior &o &he ,losin" o' &he %er"er.
    In &he T4 Fosses A,&ion, 'ile$ on Jan+ar* 16, 6010, &he )9- ,har"e$ BA- /i&h viola&in" )e,&ion 1 42a4
    o' &he 9x,han"e A,& an$ <+le 1 4a!A &here+n$er .ase$ on BA-Ms 'ail+re &o $is,lose, prior &o &he
    De,e%.er 7, 600I sharehol$er %ee&in" &o approve &he %er"er, ex&raor$inar* losses &ha& @errill
    s+s&aine$ in O,&o.er an$ Cov e%.er 600I.
    3n #e(ruary 44! 4565! the United States District ourt for the Southern District of /e1 7ork 8the
    9ourt:; entered a #inal onsent -udgment! pursuant to 1hich BA 1as re<uired to pay a civil penalty
    of =6 >5!555!555 and disgorgement of =60
    9,e case is of #articular interest! since it +as +idely re#orted by 2S national and international
    media! +,ic, tried to #ortray it as an e(am#le of effective baning regulation in t,e 2nited States3
    Ao+ever! t,e outcome of t,e litigation! and researc, of t,e P%).1 and )56.)7 records of t,e
    case s,o+ t,at 2S Judge Jed 1aoff! S.)! and >an of %merica )or#oration colluded in t,e
    conduct of simulated litigation from t,e start3
    9,e litigation in S(C v BAC is #robably one of t,e most remarable cases of simulated court
    #rocess and fraud on t,e #ublic by t,e 2S courts3 'n its notoriety! t,e case is #er,a#s only e(ceeded
    by N'L Capital v *epu+lic of Argentina in t,e same District )ourt :see section )-) and Citi,ens
    United v F(C in t,e 2S District )ourt D) and t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt :see sections )-o!#)3
    Information regarding $AC(* and C'/(CF in the US !istrict Court) Southern !istrict of
    Ne ?or&
    9,e #latforms of P%).1 and )56.)7 in t,e 2S District )ourt! Sout,ern District of =e+ ?or! are
    t,e same as #reviously described in ot,er 2S district courts3 B
    cl((viii
    C
    %s is t,e case in all 2S district and a##eals courts! t,e electronic aut,entication records :=.7s N
    =otices of .lectronic 7ilings) are e(cluded from #ublic access in P%).1 also in t,e 2S District
    )ourt! Sout,ern District of =e+ ?or3 9,e =.7s are today accessible only t,roug, )56.)7! only
    by court #ersonnel and by attorneys! +,o are aut,ori"ed by t,e courts in #articular cases3
    9,e Local *ules of t,e 2S District )ourt! Sout,ern District of =e+ ?or! as do+nloaded from t,e
    )ourtRs +ebsite! +ere revie+ed! #articularly relative to t,e follo+ing mattersG B
    cl((i(
    C
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    66/163 TOC:2
    ;#erations of P%).1 and )56.)7 and court #rocedures in,erent in t,emM )ertification of court
    records under electronic filingM
    'ssuance! doceting! and e(ecution of t,e service of summons and com#laintM
    )ertification of attorneys as %ttorneys of 1ecord u#on a##earance! and
    Definition of valid digital signatures under electronic filing3
    %s +as t,e case in all ot,er 2S courts! +,ic, +ere e(amined! t,e Local *ules of t,e 2S District
    )ourt! Sout,ern District of =e+ ?or! failed to #rovide clear and unambiguous details of electronic
    filing and electronic court #rocedures in general! and in #articular relative to t,e matters listed
    above3
    7urt,er information regarding t,e design and o#erations of P%).1 and )56.)7 +as found in t,e
    (lectronic Case Filing *ules @ Instructions and t,e C' / (CF Attorney Civil !ictionary of t,e 2S
    District )ourt! Sout,ern District of =e+ ?or3 B
    cl(((
    C Ao+ever! suc, sources are not valid legal
    sources for establis,ing t,e validity of court records3
    2sersR manuals! albeit not valid court records! #rovided additional information regarding t,e design
    and o#eration of P%).1 and )56.)7 in t,e various 2S district courts!+,ic, +ere ins#ected3 B15C
    Ao+ever! no #ublic access +as found online to t,e 2sersR 5anual of t,e 2S District )ourt!Sout,ern
    District of =e+ ?or3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    67/163 TOC:2
    /igure 440 )+%%ons as iss+e$ .* &he -lerk o' &he -o+r& an$ as exe,+&e$ in S) v Bank of America
    orporation 2180A!,v!0?I6A4 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' Ce/ Hork. The s+%%ons is
    +nsi"ne$, an$ 'ails &o sho/ &he seal o' &he ,o+r&. The s+%%ons /as also never $o,ke&e$, in $isre"ar$ o' ()
    la/, an$ &he () ,o+r& $enie$ a,,ess &o i&. I& /as even&+all* o.&aine$ &hro+"h a >ree$o% o' In'or%a&ion
    re0+es& 'ro% )9-. The ,on$+,& o' li&i"a&ion /i&h no vali$ s+%%ons, no vali$ %in+&es, an$ /here &he ,o+r&
    $enies a,,ess &o &he a+&hen&i,a&ion re,or$s 2C9>s !! Co&i,es o' 9le,&roni, >ilin"4, as /ell as &he o+&,o%e o'
    &he li&i"a&ion, poin& o+& &o &he ,on$+,& o' sha%3si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion 'ro% &he s&ar&, &hro+"h ,oll+sion o' &he
    j+$"e, &he ,lerk, an$ a&&orne*s 'or .o&h )9- an$ Bank o' A%eri,a -orpora&ion. In 'a,&, 'ro% &he s&ar& !! a
    sho/ &rial.
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    68/163 TOC:2
    Information regarding $AC(* and C'/(CF in the US !istrict Court) Southern !istrict of
    Ne ?or&
    9,e #latforms of P%).1 and )56.)7 in t,e 2S District )ourt! Sout,ern District of =e+ ?or! are
    t,e same as #reviously described in ot,er 2S district courts3 BC 9,e electronic aut,entication records
    :=.7s N =otices of .lectronic 7ilings) are e(cluded from #ublic access in P%).13 9,e =.7s are
    today accessible only t,roug, )56.)7! only by t,e courts and by attorneys! +,o are aut,ori"ed by
    t,e courts in #articular cases3
    9,e Local *ules of t,e 2S District )ourt! Sout,ern District of =e+ ?or! as do+nloaded from t,e
    )ourtRs +ebsite! +ere revie+ed! #articularly relative to t,e follo+ing mattersG B13C
    ;#erations of P%).1 and )56.)7 and court #rocedures in,erent in t,emM
    )ertification of court records under electronic filingM
    'ssuance! doceting! e(ecution of service of summons and com#laintM
    )ertification of attorneys as %ttorneys of 1ecord u#on a##earance! and
    Definition of valid digital signatures under electronic filing3
    %s +as t,e case in ot,er 2S courts! +,ic, +ere revie+ed! t,e Local *ules of t,e 2S District )ourt!
    Sout,ern District of =e+ ?or failed to #rovide clear and unambiguous details of electronic filing
    and electronic court records #rocedures in general! and in #articular relative to t,e matters listed
    above3
    7urt,er information regarding t,e design and o#erations of P%).1 and )56.)7 +as found in t,e
    (lectronic Case Filing *ules @ Instructions and t,e C' / (CF Attorney Civil !ictionary of t,e 2S
    District )ourt! Sout,ern District of =e+ ?or3 B14C Ao+ever! suc, sources are not valid official
    sources for establis,ing t,e validity of court records3
    2sersR manuals! albeit not valid court records! #rovided additional information regarding t,e design
    and o#eration of P%).1 and )56.)7 in ot,er 2S district courts! +,ic, +ere ins#ected3 B15C
    Ao+ever! no access +as found online to t,e 2sersR 5anual of t,e 2S District )ourt! Sout,ern
    District of =e+ ?or3
    % total of 1* #roceedings +ere listed in t,e P%).1 docet :see t,e full P%).1 docet and lined
    records under t,e ;nline %##endi()3 7or t+o of t,e #roceedings! no docet entry +as created :see
    belo+)3 9,ese t+o #roceedings s,ould be deemed Soff t,e recordR3 7or t,e remaining 17
    #roceedings invalid docet entries +ere created - no minutes records at all +ere lined to t,e docet
    listings! no Docet =umbers +ere designated! and no information regarding content of t,e
    #roceedings +as #rovided in t,e doceting te(t3 5oreover! based on t,e design of t,e =.7s :see
    belo+)! it is im#ossible t,at suc, docet entries +ere aut,enticated! and t,erefore! +ere effectively
    invalid docet entries! +it, no corres#onding valid court records3
    /igure 420 T/o en&ries 'ro% &he online PA-9< Do,ke& o' )9- v BA- 2180A!,v!0?I6A4 in &he () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' Ce/ Hork. The Jan+ar* 16, 6010 en&r* in,l+$es a Do,ke& C+%.er an$ a link &o
    an a,&+al re,or$. The Jan+ar* 1A, 6010 en&r* has no Do,ke& C+%.er $esi"na&e$, an$ no link &o an* re,or$.
    There'ore, no ,o+r& re,or$ exis&s 'or &he la&&er en&r*. @oreover, "iven &he $esi"n o' &he C9>s 2Co&i,es o'
    9le,&roni, >ilin"4, even ha$ &he respe,&ive re,or$ exis&e$ so%e/here, i& ,o+l$nM& possi.l* have .een
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    69/163 TOC:2
    a+&hen&i,a&e$, an$ &here'ore, /o+l$ have .een an invali$ ,o+r& re,or$. There'ore, &he %+l&iple en&ries in &he
    $o,ke& o' &his ,ase, /here no Do,ke& C+%.er an$ links are provi$e$, sho+l$ .e $ee%e$ 'alse an$
    $eli.era&el* %islea$in" $o,ke& no&a&ions.
    ;f suc, 17 minutes +it, no records! 16 +ere SenteredR by an individual identified as SmroR3 9,e full
    name and aut,ority of t,e #erson remain unno+n3 'n contrast! out of a total of -4 docet listings
    of orders and t,e 4udgment! +,ere docet number +as designated! +,ere a record +as lined! and
    +,ere informative doceting te(t +as #rovided! not a single item +as entered by SmroR3 9,e
    Doceting De#artment of t,e )ourt confirmed t,at doceting in t,e case +as not #erformed by
    De#uty )lers! but refused to disclose t,e names of t,e individuals involved3 B1$C
    .ntry of transactions in t,e P%).1 docets by unaut,ori"ed court #ersonnel! +,o +ere not bound
    by ;at, of ;ffice! +as documented in ot,er 2S district courts as +ell3 >eyond undermining t,e
    integrity of t,e docets! suc, #ractices demonstrate t,e lac of security and validity of P%).1 and
    )56.)7 as a +,ole3
    ;verall! no+,ere in t,e P%).1 docet is t,e aut,ority of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt invoed! neit,er is
    t,e name! nor t,e aut,ority of any individual as De#uty )ler to be found3
    Court records in S(C v Ban& of America Corporation B
    cl(((i
    C
    August 0' %AA; ( Civil Cover Sheet (+/t @none) - alt,oug, records of t,e 2S District )ourt!
    Sout,ern District of =e+ ?or! state t,at a )ivil )over S,eet is reIuired +,en filing a com#laint!
    no )ivil )over S,eet +as found in t,e docet of t,e case at ,and3 'n contrast! )ivil )over S,eets
    are routinely found doceted in P%).1 +it, t,e com#laints in ot,er cases3 %s furt,er noted in t,e
    1ules of )ourt! t,e )ivil )over S,eet must be #art of Service of Process! toget,er +it, t,e
    summons and com#laint3 9,e failure to file and docet a )ivil )over S,eet is of #articular
    significance! since it is one of t,e only records! +,ere a ,and signature of a De#uty )ler of t,e
    )ourt! identified by name and aut,ority! is reIuired3
    August 0' %AA; D Summons issue& (+/t @none) 2 t,e P%).1 docet states t,at on %ugust 3! -88*!
    summons +as issued as to >%)3 Ao+ever! absent a Docet =umber! t,e te(t cannot #ossibly be
    deemed a valid docet entry3 %dditionally! no lin +as #rovided in t,e P%).1 docet to t,e
    summons record itself3 9,erefore! no electronic aut,entication could ,ave been issued t,roug, an
    =.7 under suc, circumstances on t,e summons3
    9,e summonses of t,e courts are #ublic records by la+3 9,erefore! access to t,e summons as issued
    +as re#eatedly reIuested from t,e office of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt3 %ccess +as denied3
    .ventually! a co#y of t,e summons! as issued by t,e )ler of t,e )ourt! +as obtained t,roug,
    7reedom of 'nformation %ct :7;'%) res#onse from S.)3 9,e summons as issued by t,e )ler +as
    discovered to be unsigned3 9,erefore! t,e summons +as in fact invalid3 B1*C
    9,e invalidity of t,e summons undermines t,e validity of t,e litigation as a +,ole3 Ao+ever! t,e
    invalidity of t,e summons in t,is case could not be discerned in P%).1! t,e #ublic access system3
    Service of 9rocess (+/t @none) - no+,ere in t,e docet of t,e case is t,ere any indication t,at
    service of t,e summons +as in fact e(ecuted! alternatively! t,at service +as +aived3 'n 7;'%
    res#onse! t,e unsigned summons record +as #rovided as t,e record of bot, t,e summons as issued
    and t,e summons as e(ecuted3 :.igure 1) =eedless to say! e(ecution of service of unsigned!
    invalid summons is invalid e(ecution3 5oreover! no record of t,e e(ecution of service +as
    #rovided3
    August 0' %AA; ( 7otion for entr of Settlement Agreement (+/t @none) ( alt,oug, media
    re#orted from t,e onset of t,e litigation t,at a #ro#osed Settlement %greement for T33 millions +as
    filed on %ugust 3! -88*! alt,oug, several docet records later referred to t,e #ending Settlement
    %greement! and alt,oug, on Se#tember -4! -88*! ;rder +as entered in t,e docet! #ur#ortedly
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    70/163 TOC:2
    re4ecting t,e t,en #ending before t,e )ourt #ro#osed Settlement %greement! no 5otion for entry of
    t,e #ro#osed Settlement %greement and no #ro#osed Settlement %greement +ere found in t,e
    docet3
    9,e failure to file a 5otion for .ntry of t,e Settlement %greement! and conseIuent conduct of
    motion +it, no foundation records su##ort t,e o#inion t,at t,e litigation as a +,ole +as conducted
    as an invalid litigation3
    August #A' %AA; D Goff the recor&H $rocee&ing (+/t @none) ( t,ere is no docet listing at all for
    t,e %ugust 18! -88* #roceeding3 Ao+ever! evidence of its conduct is #rovided in t,e P%).1
    docet entries Q15!16! and 173
    9,e conduct of Soff t,e recordR court #roceeding also su##orts t,e o#inion t,at t,e litigation as a
    +,ole +as conducted as an invalid litigation3
    August %3' %AA; ( Or&er $ertaining to revie8 of $ro$ose& Settlement Agreement (+/t @#0) 2
    t,e %ugust -5! -88* ;rder statesG
    This -o+r& has &he o.li"a&ion, /i&hin ,are'+ll* pres,ri.e$ li%i&s, &o $e&er%ine /he&her &he propose$
    -onsen& J+$"%en& se&&lin" &his ,ase is 'air, reasona.le, a$e0+a&e, an$ in &he p+.li, in&eres&.
    9,e ruling on a matter t,at +as never #ending before t,e )ourt su##orts t,e o#inion of conduct of
    an invalid litigation3
    .ebruar %%' %A#A' .inal Consent -u&gment (+/t @;5) ( on 7ebruary --! -818! t,e 7inal )onsent
    Judgment +as filed by Judge Jed 1aoff3
    9,e doceting te(t of t,e 7inal )onsent Judgment statesG
    >ICAF -OC)9CT J(DB@9CT A) TO D9>9CDACT BACG O> A@9<I-A -O<PO<ATIOC P 10,06A7
    in 'avor o' )e,+ri&ies an$ 9x,han"e -o%%ission a"ains& Bank o' A%eri,a -orpora&ion in &he a%o+n&
    o' Q 170,000,001.00. 2)i"ne$ .* J+$"e Je$ ). <ako'' on 6364360104 2A&&a,h%en&s8 P 1 Co&i,e o' <i"h&
    &o Appeal4 2$&4 29n&ere$8 06364360104 Dsi, RjzE
    %ccess +as re#eatedly reIuested to t,e =.7 of t,e 7inal )onsent Judgment! absent +,ic,! t,e
    record cannot be deemed a valid court record3 %ccess continues to be denied3
    Freedom of Information Act 9F-IA= and Fair Fund Administrator *esponses
    +,ile t,e )ler of t,e )ourt refused to #rovide access to t,e missing court records in t,is case!
    +,ic, are #ublic records by la+! limited! but significant access +as gained to records from ot,er
    sources3
    9,e 7;'% res#onse yielded a co#y of a record t,at +as described as /summons! as issued by cler0
    and /summons! as e(ecuted03 Ao+ever! t,e record #roduced in t,e 7;'% res#onse is an unsigned
    summons +it, no seal of t,e )ourt3 9,erefore! it could not #ossibly be deemed a valid summons3
    9,e 7air 7und %dministrator #rovided a co#y of one =.7 only3 9,e same office refused to #rovide
    t,e =.7s of ot,er records! most notably t,e =.7 of t,e 7inal )onsent Judgment :Dt Q*7)3 =o
    e(#lanation at all +as #rovided by t,e 7air 7und %dministrator for t,e refusal to #rovide co#ies of
    t,e additional =.7s3
    Circumstances Surrounding the Litigation of S(C v BAC
    9,e =e+ ?or 9imes re#orted t,e ne+s regarding t,e 7inal )onsent Judgment in t,is case as
    follo+sG B-8C
    In a r+lin" &ha& 'ree$ Bank o' A%eri,a 'ro% so%e le"al pro.le%s, a 'e$eral j+$"e /ro&e on @on$a* &ha&
    he ha$ rel+,&an&l* approve$ a Q170 %illion se&&le%en& /i&h &he )e,+ri&ies an$ 9x,han"e
    -o%%issionO :This ,o+r&, /hile shakin" i&s hea$, "ran&s &he ).9.-.Ms %o&ion an$ approves &he
    propose$ ,onsen& j+$"%en&,; &he j+$"e /ro&e.
    'nde#endent investigation of events surrounding t,e >%)-5errill Dync, merger by State of =e+
    ?or %ttorney @eneral %ndre+ )uomo +as summed u# in ,is %#ril -3! -88* letter to t,e 2S
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    71/163 TOC:2
    )ongress3 B-1C %nalystsR re#orted follo+ing release of t,e letter and its attac,ments under ,eadlines
    suc, as SDet t,e )riminal 'ndictments >eginG Paulson! >ernane! De+isR! S>igger 9,an HatergatePR!
    and S)uomo 2nveils Paulson! >ernane! De+is )ons#iracyR3 Ao+ever! in contrast +it, suc,
    analystsR o#inions! none of t,e #er#etrators suffered any material conseIuences so far3
    Judge Jed 1aoff! +,o #resided in t,e case! is considered one of t,e most e(#erienced and notable
    among 2S 4udges in matters #ertaining to securities! +,ite-collar crime! and raceteering3
    1egarding Judge Jed 1aoffRs conduct in t,e case at ,and! t,e #all Street 7ournal La Blog saidG
    B--C
    <ako''Ms ,+rren&l* provin" hi%sel' &o .e, i' no&hin" else, +na'rai$ &o sin"le!han$e$l* &ake on so%e
    heav*/ei"h& ins&i&+&ions an$ &heir la/*ers.
    =umerous attorneys a##eared in t,e case! bot, for Plaintiff S.)! a government entity! and for
    Defendant >%)3 ;ver -8 =otices of %##earance a##ear in t,e P%).1 docet of t,e case3
    'n a Se#tember --! -88* re#ort! t,e Has,ington Post Iuotes official statement by S.)G
    KD#Ee /ill vi"oro+sl* p+rs+e o+r ,har"es a"ains& Bank o' A%eri,a an$ &ake s&eps &o prove o+r ,ase
    in ,o+r&,K &he )9- sai$ in a s&a&e%en&. K#e /ill +se &he a$$i&ional $is,over* availa.le in &he li&i"a&ion
    &o '+r&her p+rs+e &he 'a,&s an$ $e&er%ine /he&her &o seek &he ,o+r&Ls per%ission &o .rin" a$$i&ional
    ,har"es in &his ,ase.K
    't is alleged t,at it is #ractically im#ossible t,at t,e #rominent attorneys! +,o a##eared in t,e case
    for bot, S.) and >%) attorneys +ere una+are of t,e invalid nature of t,e litigation3
    9,e litigation of t,e case +as e(tensively covered by ma4or 2S media outlets! and also by
    international media3 % total of ten :18) re#orts of t,e litigation +ere found in t,e =e+ ?or 9imes!
    eig,t :$) re#orts in t,e Has,ington Post! and do"ens of re#orts in t,e Hall Street Journal3 Die+ise!
    fourteen :14) re#orts +ere found on t,e matter in t,e 9imes of Dondon3 Ao+ever! t,ere is no reason
    to assume t,at any media! +,ic, re#orted on t,e litigation ever gained access to records in t,e case
    beyond t,ose accessible in t,e P%).1 docet! as described above3 9,ere is also no evidence of
    efforts by media to gain access to t,e missing critical court records! +,ere #ublic access +as
    denied3 't is difficult to believe t,at e(#erienced legal re#orters of ma4or media outlets never noticed
    t,e fatal defects in t,e records and conduct of t,e litigation3
    -verall Conduct of the Litigation
    9,e conduct of t,e 2S District )ourt in t,is matter s,ould be revie+ed in t,e conte(t of t,e conduct
    of civil litigation as sti#ulated in t,e Federal *ules of Civil $rocedure! and as outlined in t,e Civil
    Litigation 'anagement 'anual) Second (dition :-818) by t,e Judicial )onference of t,e 2nited
    States3 B-3C 2#on suc, revie+! a reasonable #erson +ould most liely conclude t,at t,e litigation as
    a +,ole +as ever deemed by t,e 2S )ourt itself as valid litigation! conducted #ursuant to t,e la+ of
    t,e 2nited States3
    9,e outcome of t,e litigation s,ould also be vie+ed from t,e fundamental fairness #ers#ectiveG
    'ndividuals! +,o +ere baning e(ecutives! unla+fully too bonuses in t,e sum of T53$ billions from
    s,are,olders3 9,e outcome of t,e litigation +as t,at com#ensation in t,e sum of T158 millions +as
    #aid by t,e s,are,olders to t,emselves! no funds +ere returned by any e(ecutives +,o received t,e
    unla+ful bonuses! and no individual +as ,eld accountable for t,e unla+ful conduct3
    9,e %ugust -5! -88* ;rder :Dt Q13) statesG
    This -o+r& has &he o.li"a&ion, /i&hin ,are'+ll* pres,ri.e$ li%i&s, &o $e&er%ine /he&her &he propose$
    -onsen& J+$"%en& se&&lin" &his ,ase is 'air, reasona.le, a$e0+a&e,an$ in &he p+.li, in&eres&.
    9,e ruling on a matter t,at +as never #ending before t,e )ourt su##orts t,e o#inion of conduct of
    an invalid litigation3
    ;n 7ebruary --! -818! t,e 7inal )onsent Judgment :DtQ*7) +as filed by Judge Jed 1aoff3 9,e
    doceting te(t of t,e 7inal )onsent Judgment statesG
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    72/163 TOC:2
    >ICAF -OC)9CT J(DB@9CT A) TO D9>9CDACT BACG O> A@9<I-A -O<PO<ATIOC P
    10,06A7 in 'avor o' )e,+ri&ies an$ 9x,han"e -o%%ission a"ains& Bank o' A%eri,a -orpora&ion in
    &he a%o+n& o' Q170,000,001.00. 2)i"ne$ .* J+$"e Je$ ). <ako'' on 6364360104 2A&&a,h%en&s8 P 1
    Co&i,e o' <i"h& &o Appeal42$&4 29n&ere$8 06364360104 Dsi, RjzE
    %ccess +as re#eatedly reIuested to t,e =.7 of t,e 7inal )onsent Judgment! absent +,ic,! t,e
    record cannot be deemed a valid court record3 %ccess continues to be denied3
    H,ile t,e )ler of t,e )ourt refused to #rovide access to t,e missing court records in t,is case!
    +,ic, are #ublic records by la+! limited! but significant access +as gained to records from ot,er
    sources3 9,e 7;'% res#onse yielded a co#y of a record t,at +as described as /summons! as issued
    by cler0 and /summons! as e(ecuted03 Ao+ever! t,e record #roduced in t,e 7;'% res#onse is an
    unsigned summons +it, no seal of t,e )ourt3 9,erefore! it could not #ossibly be deemed a valid
    summons3
    9,e =e+ ?or 9imes re#orted t,e ne+s regarding t,e 7inal )onsent Judgment in t,is case as
    follo+sG
    In a r+lin" &ha& 'ree$ Bank o' A%eri,a 'ro% so%e le"al pro.le%s, a 'e$eral j+$"e /ro&e on @on$a*
    &ha& he ha$ rel+,&an&l* approve$ a Q170 %illion se&&le%en& /i&h &he )e,+ri&ies an$ 9x,han"e
    -o%%issionO :This ,o+r&, /hile shakin" i&s hea$, "ran&s &he ).9.-.Ms %o&ion an$ approves &he
    propose$ ,onsen& j+$"%en&,; &he j+$"e /ro&e.
    'nde#endent investigation of events surrounding t,e >%)-5errill Dync, merger by State of =e+
    ?or %ttorney @eneral %ndre+ )uomo +as summed u# in ,is %#ril -3! -88* letter to t,e 2S
    )ongress3 %nalystsR re#orted follo+ing release of t,e letter and its attac,ments under ,eadlines suc,
    as SDet t,e )riminal 'ndictments >eginG Paulson! >ernane! De+isR! S>igger 9,an HatergatePR! and
    S)uomo 2nveils Paulson! >ernane! De+is )ons#iracyR3 Ao+ever! in contrast +it, suc, analystsR
    o#inions! none of t,e #er#etrators suffered any material conseIuences so far3
    Judge Jed 1aoff! +,o #resided in t,e case! is considered one of t,e most e(#erienced and notable
    among 2S 4udges in matters #ertaining to securities! +,ite-collar crime! and raceteering3
    1egarding Judge Jed 1aoffRs conduct in t,e case at ,and! t,e Hall Street Journal Da+ >log saidG
    <ako''Ms ,+rren&l* provin" hi%sel' &o .e, i' no&hin" else, +na'rai$ &o sin"le!han$e$l* &ake on so%e
    heav* /ei"h& ins&i&+&ions an$ &heir la/*ers.
    =umerous attorneys a##eared in t,e case! bot, for Plaintiff S.)! a government entity! and for
    Defendant >%)3 ;ver -8 =otices of %##earance a##ear in t,e P%).1 docet of t,e case3
    'n a Se#tember --! -88* re#ort! t,e Has,ington Post Iuotes official statement by S.)G
    KD#Ee /ill vi"oro+sl* p+rs+e o+r ,har"es a"ains& Bank o' A%eri,a an$ &ake s&eps &o prove o+r ,ase in
    ,o+r&,K&he )9- sai$ in a s&a&e%en&. K#e /ill +se &he a$$i&ional $is,over* availa.le in &he li&i"a&ion &o
    '+r&her p+rs+e &he 'a,&s an$ $e&er%ine /he&her &o seek &he ,o+r&Ms per%ission &o .rin" a$$i&ional
    ,har"es in &his ,ase.K
    Court *ecords in Litigation of S(C v BAC
    9,e #rimary source of records +as t,roug, #ublic access to P%).1 records3 %dditionally! efforts
    +ere made to obtain missing records! +,ere access in P%).1 +as not available! t,roug, reIuests!
    +,ic, +ere for+arded to t,e office of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt! attorneys for S.) and >%) in t,e
    case! office of t,e ),air of S.)! office of >%) President! 7reedom of 'nformation %ct :7;'%)
    office of S.)! and t,e office of 7air 7und %dministrator3
    $u+lic Access to (lectronic Court *ecords
    %s +as t,e case in all ot,er 2S district courts! +,ic, +ere ins#ected! #ublic access to t,e
    aut,entication records :=.7s) of t,e )ourt in P%).1 is denied3 B16C 7urt,ermore! at t,e 2S
    District )ourt! Sout,ern District of =e+ ?or! #ublic access to t,e )alendars of t,e )ourts is
    unreasonably limited3 %ccess is #ermitted only to t,e current seven days +indo+! and access to t,e
    Docet %ctivity 1e#ort is denied :see belo+)3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    73/163 TOC:2
    %lt,oug, never stated in t,e *ules of Court of t,e 2S District )ourt! Sout,ern District of =e+
    ?or! t,e evidence s,o+s t,at! as is t,e case in ot,er 2S courts! t,e =.7s +ere in fact deemed t,e
    aut,entication by t,e )ler of t,e )ourt3 =o ot,er forms of aut,entication records! #ertaining to
    4udicial records :minutes! orders! 4udgment) +ere found in t,e P%).1 docet3 9,e =.7 of t,e 2S
    District )ourt! Sout,ern District of =e+ ?or! as to form! +as identical to t,e =.7! as discovered in
    ot,er 2S courts3 9,e =.7 form! in and of itself! s,ould be considered invalid as a certificate3 't
    includes no certification statement! /' certifyU0! it never invoes t,e aut,ority of t,e )ler of t,e
    )ourt! it never names t,e #erson! +,o issued it! and it includes neit,er a gra#,ic ,and-signature! nor
    a valid digital signature of an aut,ori"ed individual! affi(ed as a symbol of intent to tae
    res#onsibility3 'nstead! it only includes a mac,ine generated! encry#ted c,ecsum string3
    %lt,oug, t,e Federal *ules of Civil $rocedure #rescribe t,e doceting of t,e summons as issued by
    t,e )ler of t,e )ourt! and t,e minutes of t,e #roceedings! t,ese records +ere missing from P%).1
    docet of t,e case at ,and3
    $u+lic Access to *ecords from -ther Sources
    1eIuests for co#ies of t,e missing litigation records! +,ic, +ere for+arded to t,e office of t,e
    )ler of t,e )ourt! to attorneys for #arties in t,e case! to t,e office of S.) ),air! and to t,e office
    of President of >%)! +ere all denied3
    .ventually! only one =.7 +as obtained from t,e office of t,e 7air 7und %dministrator3 %ccess to
    t,e ot,er =.7s +as denied by t,e same office +it, no e(#lanation at all3
    9,e summons! as issued by t,e )ler of t,e )ourt! +as eventually obtained in res#onse to a
    7reedom of 'nformation %ct :7;'%) reIuest3 Ao+ever! t,e same office failed to #roduce t,e
    missing records of t,e =.7s in t,is case3
    $AC(* and C'/(CF) I. Systems of the US Courts
    9,e case of S.) v >an of %merica documents t,e critical effect of P%).1 and )56.)7! t,e
    information systems of t,e 2S courts relative to integrity of 2S court records and integrity of t,e
    2S courts! or lac t,ereof3
    )onditions t,at today #revail in t,e 2S courts stand in star contrast +it, t,e la+s enacted by 2S
    )ongress! Presidential Directives! 1egulations! and a##lications! +,ic, ,ave been #resumably
    im#lemented for aut,entication and validation of e-government in t,e 2nited States3 B-4! -5C
    Deficiencies in t,e design and o#eration of P%).1 and )56.)7 +ere #reviously noted in re#orts!
    +,ic, +ere #ublis,ed in a com#uter science and in a legal 4ournals3 B-6! -7C 9,e re#ort in t,e
    National La 7ournal documented t,e a##arent falsification of records in anot,er landmar case N
    t,e ,abeas cor#us #etition of a @uantanamo detainee in t,e 2S District )ourt in Has,ington D)3
    Suc, conduct s,ould ,ave been #revented! or s,ould ,ave triggered alerts in any valid court
    information system3
    'issing Court *ecords A Cardinal Sign of 7udicial Corruption.
    2nited =ations re#orts on /Strengt,ening Judicial 'ntegrity0 advocate t,e im#lementation of
    com#uteri"ed information systems in t,e courts! as a tool for en,ancement of trans#arency and
    integrity of t,e courts3 B31! 3-C
    Ao+ever! t,e same 2nited =ations re#orts list missing court records as a cardinal sign of 4udicial
    corru#tion3 'n t,e case of P%).1 and )56.)7! t,e im#lementation of invalid information systems
    in t,e courts! enables t,e conduct of litigation! +,ere critical records are #ermanently missing! as
    demonstrated in t,e current re#ort3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    74/163 TOC:2
    Ban&ing *egulation
    )onduct of t,e S.)! >%)! and t,e 2S District )ourt in S(C v BAC! as documented in t,e current
    re#ort! stands contrary to ongoing efforts by t,e 2S )ongress! and re#eated statements by t,e 2S
    @overnment regarding efforts to restore t,e integrity of >aning 1egulation in t,e 2nited States!
    and en,ance t,e accountability of directors! e(ecutives! accountants! and attorneys! acting on be,alf
    of cor#orations3 'n t,e +ae of t,e .nron scandal! t,e 2S )ongress #assed t,e Sar+anes2-4ley Act
    :-88-)3 'n t,e current financial crisis! t,e 2S )ongress #assed t,e Fraud (nforcement and
    *ecovery Act :-88*)3 S.) and ot,er >aning 1egulators routinely a##ear before t,e 2S )ongress
    and #rovide testimonies! +,ic, claim t,at integrity of >aning 1egulation in t,e 2nited State ,as
    been restored3
    9,e 2S @overnment +as also #ressured by t,e international community! +,ic, +as seriously
    ,armed by t,e ongoing financial crisis! to tae corrective measures! consistent +it, t,e 2S
    @overnmentRs duties and obligations in international treaties and accords3
    'n t,at conte(t! t,e litigation of S(C v BAC in t,e 2S )ourt! Sout,ern District of =e+ ?or!
    revie+ed in t,e current re#ort! +as re#orted as t,e ,allmar of enforcement of >aning 1egulation
    in t,e ongoing financial crisis3
    'n contrast! revie+ of t,e case at ,and documents litigation of S(C v BAC as merely a #retense3 't
    also documents t,e tig,t lin bet+een integrity in t,e 2S courts! or lac t,ereof! and t,e failure of
    2S >aning 1egulation3 9,e case as a +,ole can be vie+ed as a /s,o+ trial0! intended to falsely
    re#resent t,e #erce#tion of effective >aning 1egulation and enforcement of t,e la+3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    75/163 TOC:2
    i) 0c8arr v 8eriatric Facilities of Cape Code, %nc et al
    /igure 4@0 Ja,kson Fe/is, one o' &he lar"es& la.or la/ 'ir%s in &he (), en"a"e$ in ,on$+,& o' &he 'ra+$
    a"ains& a $isa.le$ n+rse in &he ,o+r& o' () J+$"e Beor"e A OLTool in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r& in "c*arry v
    *eriatric #acility of ape ode! $nc et al0
    'n 'cGarry v Geriatric Facilities of Cape Code) Inc et al :1G18-cv-11343) in t,e 2S District )ourt!
    5assac,usetts! Daura 5c@arry! a disabled nurse! filed com#laint #ursuant to t,e Americans ith
    !isa+ilities Act! 4- 2S) J1-1$:-)! claiming discrimination based on disability! related to t,e
    refusal of Defendants to intervie+ ,er for an o#en #osition of full-time %ssistant Director of
    =ursing3 B
    cl(((ii
    C
    Conduct of Simulated Litigation
    9,e evidence! detailed belo+! documents t,at Plaintiff Daura 5c@arry! a disabled %merican! +,o
    attem#ted to #rotect ,er rig,ts under t,e la+ of t,e 2nited States! +as denied access to an ,onest
    court3 'nstead! t,roug, collusion of 4udges! court #ersonnel! and attorneys for t,e Defendants! s,e
    +as sub4ected to simulated litigationG
    9,e records include simulated minutes! orders! and electronic aut,entication records :=.7s N
    =otices of .lectronic 7iling)3
    Judge ;R9ool a##eared in t,e case +it, no valid %ssignment ;rder :no docet number)3 ;f note!
    Judge ;R9ool #resided in cases #ertaining to corru#tion of t,e >oston 4ustice system! and entered
    ,ars, sentences on t,ose convicted3 Judge ;R9ool is also advertised as an e(#ert on electronic
    court tec,nology3
    5agistrate Soroin a##eared in t,e case +it, no valid 1eferral ;rder :no docet number)3
    Pro Se Plaintiff 5c@arry in #art reali"ed t,at t,e litigation +as simulated! and a##roac,ed ),ief
    Judge 5ar D Holf in t,is regard :see letter! +it, litigation records! BiC)3 9,ere is no evidence of
    corrective actions by t,e ),ief Judge3 ;f note! ),ief Judge Holf served as De#uty 2S %ttorney
    and +as c,ief of t,e Public )orru#tion 2nit from 1*$1 to 1*$53
    %ut,ority of t,e attorneys for Defendants :Jacson De+is DDP! a large national la+ firm!
    s#eciali"ing in labor6em#loyment la+) as %ttorneys of 1ecord! is yet to be establis,ed3 5ost
    liely t,ey falsely a##eared +it, no aut,ority at allG =o record a##ears in t,e docet! +,ere t,ey
    signed as %ttorneys of 1ecordM t,ey never filed any declaration by any of t,e Defendants! and t,e
    %ns+er :Dt Q-1) is not verified3 BivC Suc, conduct is ty#ical of outside attorneys! a##earing
    +it, no aut,ority as counsel of record! and +it, &no communication +it, client clause& - a fraud
    met,od detailed in )ase of >orro+er Hilliam Parsley :see section acs)3
    ;f #articular concern is t,e disa##earance from t,e P%).1 docet! +it, no evidence of due
    #rocess! of t,e record of PlaintiffEs 5otion for )ontem#t :Dt Q$5)! +,ic, +as duly filed and
    doceted :see t,e 5otion and t,e =.7 +it, litigation records)3
    Due aut,ority of court #ersonnel! +,o issued summons and /entered0 minutes and orders! as
    De#uty )lers! remains to be establis,ed3
    I. systems ere employed for the conduct of simulated litigation
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    76/163 TOC:2
    '9 systems of t,e 2S )ourtsG P%).1 and )56.)7 +ere em#loyed in t,is case for t,e conduct of
    simulated litigation3 9,e #ractice in common in t,e 2S courts! often to benefit financial
    institutions! cor#orations and government officials! and to de#rive individuals of t,eir la+ful rig,ts3
    9,e #ractice involves t,e issuance of electronic records! +,ic, are not deemed valid and effectual
    records by t,e courts t,emselves! but +,ic, t,e victims are led to believe are valid court records3
    9,e P%).1 docet in t,is case includes numerous records t,at are unaut,enticated! and are deemed
    by t,e 2S courts t,emselves as void3 9,e #ublic! and most often pro se litigants as +ell! cannot
    distinguis, bet+een valid and void court records!since #ublic access to t,e =.7s - t,e clerRs
    electronic aut,entication records3
    9,e case at ,and is uniIue! since Pro Se Plaintiff Daura 5c@arry +as #ermitted access to )56.)7!
    and t,erefore! most of t,e =.7s of 4udicial and clerical record in t,is case are included among t,e
    records! lined belo+3
    9,erefore! t,e case #rovides uniIue documentation ,o+ t,e '9 systems of t,e 2S courts! P%).1
    and )56.)7! are em#loyed for a large-scale fraud! +,ic, undermines t,e integrity of t,e 2S courts
    and t,e Auman 1ig,ts of t,e Peo#le of t,e 2nited States3
    9,e conduct of simulated litigation! t,roug, t,e collusion of large la+ firms! 4udges! and court
    #ersonnel s,ould be deemed organi"ed state crime3
    7udges and Court
    9,e 2S District )ourt! 5assac,usetts! is t,e oldest 2S District )ourt in t,e 2nited States! as
    #roudly stated on t,e )ourtRs +eb site3
    ),ief Judge 5ar D Holf 9 is a graduate of ?ale )ollege and Aarvard Da+ Sc,ool3 Ae +as
    a##ointed a De#uty 23S3 %ttorney and +as c,ief of t,e Public )orru#tion 2nit from 1*$1 to
    1*$53 Holf +as a lecturer at Aarvard Da+ Sc,ool from 1*$* to 1**8! and a lecturer at >oston
    )ollege Da+ Sc,ool in 1**-3
    2S Judge @eorge % ;R9ool - t,e case is listed as /assigned0 to 2S Judge @eorge % ;R9ool! a
    graduate of >oston )ollege and Aarvard Da+ Sc,ool3
    2S 5agistrate Deo 9 Soroin - t,e case is listed as /referred0 to 2S 5agistrate Deo 9 Soroin! a
    ?ale )ollege and )olumbia Da+ Sc,ool graduate3
    9,e names of numerous individuals! members of t,e )ourtRs staff a##ear in t,e court records in
    t,e case3 9,eir e(act aut,orities remain to be determined3
    %ttorneys for Defendants Partner @uy P3 9ully and %ssociate >rian ),ilds! from t,e >oston
    office of t,e la+ firm of Jacson De+is DDP! a##eared in t,e case and filed #a#ers on be,alf of
    Defendants3
    Jacson De+is DDP 9 is a large national la+ firm! +it, over 658 attorneys in 46 offices
    nation+ide! s#eciali"ing in labor and em#loyment la+3 9,e >oston office 5anaging Partner
    %ndre+ Picett is a graduate of Princeton )ollege and )ornell Da+ Sc,ool3
    ;verall t,e cast of c,aracters in t,is case a##ears as an 'vy Deague racet3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    77/163 TOC:2
    .) 0aid of the 0ist Corporation et al v 5illiam 5indsor
    /igure 4A0 #illia% #in$sor, 'or%erl* a s+,,ess'+l .+siness person, () J+$"e Orin$a 9vans, () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&, Cor&hern Dis&ri,& o' Beor"ia.
    'aid of the 'ist Corporation et al v #illiam #indsor :1G86-cv-88714) originated in a business
    dis#ute3 'n t,e course of t,e litigation! Hilliam Hindsor! formerly a successful businessman! +as
    stri##ed of most of ,is assets! in +,at is o#ined as simulated litigation3 =umerous attem#ts to gain
    access to 4ustice in t,e courts of a##eals and t,e Su#reme )ourt all failed3 5oreover! once Hilliam
    Hindsor became an anti-4udicial corru#tion activist! it a##ears t,at ,e +as targeted for retaliation by
    t,e various courts3
    General Notes
    )ase Summary and Docet as a +,oleG B
    cl(((iii
    C
    a3 =o name and aut,ority is listed as to t,e individuals +,o entered notations and records in t,e
    Docet3
    b3 %ll %ttestation records :=.7s - =otices of .lectronic 7iling) by t,e )ler of t,e 2S District
    )ourt +ere e(cluded from t,e Docet3
    Public %ccess to t,e Judgment 'nde( of t,e )ourt is denied3 9,e 2S District )ourt! =ort,ern
    District of @eorgia! differs in t,is matter from most 2S District )ourts! +,ic, +ere e(amined3 't
    is liely t,at u#on investigation! it +ould be discovered t,at t,e =ort,ern District of @eorgia
    routinely engages in raceteering relative to false #retense of entry of 4udgments in litigation of
    cases in t,e )ourt
    Pending Statuses 1e#ort s,o+sG &=o statuses #ending! =o statuses terminated3&
    1elated 9ransactions 1e#ort s,o+s t,e )om#laint not terminated! even after t,e case is listed in
    an unnumbered docet entry as &terminated&3
    Hindsor +as never served any =.7s of 4udicial records in ,is case! and ,is reIuest to ins#ect and
    to co#y t,e =.7s +as denied3
    Specific !oc&et *ecords5
    +/t @none ( =o %ssignment ;rder for Judge J ;+en 7orrester a##ears in t,e Docet
    +/t @AA6 - 5arc, -*! -886 1ecusal of Judge ;+en and 1eassignment of Judge .vansG
    a3 =o 1eassignment ;rder for Judge ;rinda D .vans a##ears in t,e docet3
    b3 9,e doceting te(t states reassignment! but t,e record itself includes not,ing to t,at effect3
    +/t @none ( 9,e Hrit of .(ecution +as never doceted! and no docet number +as designated3
    9,erefore! no =.7 could #ossibly be issued on suc, docet notation :after Dct Q753)
    0430A36010 #<IT o' 9xe,+&ion iss+e$ in &he a%o+n& o' Q1A6,377.I7 a"ains& #illia% @. #in$sor.
    Ori"inal %aile$ &o -arl An$erson via ,er&i'ie$ %ail. 2ank4 29n&ere$8 0430A360104
    +/t @none - %ll certificates by t,e De#uty )lers! consistently! +ere not doceted! and no docet
    numbers +ere designated to t,em3 9,erefore! no =.7s could #ossibly be issued on t,e certificates3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    78/163 TOC:2
    'n ot,er +ords - none of t,e records! notated as certified! +as in fact certified3 ;ver 38 suc, records
    a##ear in t,e docet3
    +/t @none - %ll certificates! +,ic, +ere filed by Defendant Hindsor! +ere lie+ise not doceted!
    and no docet numbers +ere assigned to t,em3 'n ot,er +ords! none of t,e records! noted as
    certified! +as in fact certified3 % total of 6 suc, records a##ear in t,e docet3
    Conclusions
    7or all t,e reasons listed above! t,e P%).1 records and t,e docet of t,e 2S District )ourt!
    =ort,ern District of @eorgia in 'aid of the 'ist v #indsor as a +,ole cannot be deemed valid
    court records3
    % P%).1 docet +as meticulously constructed! including ,undreds of #a#ers! to misleadingly
    a##ear as a valid docet of t,e 2S District )ourt3
    Defendant Hindsor +as t,erefore ased to obtain co#ies of t,e =.7s of ey docet records and a
    co#y of t Judgment 'nde(! in order to conclusively establis, +,et,er t,e docet in t,is case in
    fact is 7raud on t,e )ourt3
    Suc, conduct in t,e 2S District )ourt +as #atroni"ed by t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! 11t, )ircuit
    and t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt in related cases3 B
    cl(((iv
    C
    !) 20L Capital v Republic of $rgentina
    /igure 4B0 )&ree& s,ene 'ro% &he Ar"en&inian e,ono%i, ,ollapse o' 6001, () J+$"e Tho%as Briesa.
    N'L Capital v *epu+lic of Argentina :1G8$-cv-86*7$) in t,e 2S District )ourt! Sout,ern District of
    =e+ ?or! originates in t,e default of t,e 1e#ublic of %rgentina on sovereign debt3 9,e state of
    affairs! resulting from Judge @riesa! +as described as follo+sG
    The ,o+n&$o/n s&ar&e$ on J+ne 1?&h, /hen &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es anno+n,e$ &ha& i&
    /o+l$ no& "e& involve$ in Ar"en&inaMs .a&&le /i&h C@F -api&al, a he$"e '+n$ &ha& pi,ke$ +p ,heap $e.&
    a'&er Ar"en&inaMs 6001 $e'a+l& an$ has sin,e li&i"a&e$ 'or pa*%en& o' '+ll prin,ipal pl+s in&eres&. The
    $e,ision le'& in&a,& a r+lin" .* Tho%as Briesa, a Ce/ Hork $is&ri,&!,o+r& j+$"e, /hi,h .anne$ Ar"en&ina
    'ro% pa*in" &he ,re$i&ors /ho in 6007 an$ 6010 s/appe$ A3U o' $e'a+l&e$ $e.& 'or per'or%in"
    se,+ri&ies, i' &he ,o+n&r* $i$ no& also pa* C@F /ha& i& /an&s. D
    ,lxxxv
    E
    % ne+ default of %rgentina is #oised to cause unem#loyment! ,ards,i#! and even ,unger for
    millions in %rgentina3 B
    cl(((vi
    !
    cl(((vii
    C
    9,e 4urisdiction of t,e 2S )ourt in suc, matter is not at all clear! and %rgentina referred to t,e 2S
    4udge in t,is case as &im#erialist&3 B
    cl(((viii
    C 'ts attem#t to litigate t,e case in t,e 'nternational )ourt
    of Justice +as bloced by t,e 2nited States3
    %nd yet! even in a case of suc, #ro#ortions and suc, im#lications! t,ere is no +ay to ascertain t,at
    valid litigation +as conducted by t,e 2S District )ourt! rat,er t,an simulated litigation3
    1evie+ of t,e records in t,is case s,o+sG B
    cl(((i(
    C
    +/t @none - =o summons +as doceted! eit,er as issued by t,e cler! or as served3
    +/t @AA# - 9,e )om#laint +as doceted +it, no )ivil )over S,eet! reIuired by )ivil Ditigation
    5anual of t,e 7ederal Judicial )ouncil for o#ening a court file by t,e )ler of t,e )ourt3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    79/163 TOC:2
    +/t @AA3 - 9,e =otice of %ssignment to Judge 9,omas @riesa :Q885) bears no valid signature of
    t,e )ler of t,e )ourt3
    +/t @%1A' 141' 3#5' 300 - ;rders and Judgment! issued by Judge @riesa :Dt Q-48! 464! 517!
    533) bear no Seal of t,e )ourt or attestation by t,e )ler of t,e )ourt3
    +/t @141 - 5otion and ;rder on 5otion by &=on-#arty& )itigrou# ,ave no foundation in 2S la+3
    =o 5otion to 'ntervene or 1eIuest for Deave to 7ile +ere filed by )itigrou#3
    @iven t,e +ides#read fraud in t,e 2S courts in cases related to baning :see section .-3! T-3)! t,e
    case s,ould be deemed of dubious validity at best3 9,e case s,ould also be ,eld sus#ect! since
    already in ,is boo &@lobali"ation and 'ts Discontent&! none ot,er t,an 2S-based =obel #ri"e
    +inner Jose#, Stieglit" raised t,e sus#icion t,at t,e colla#se of t,e %rgentinian economy +as t,e
    ,andi+or of Stanley 7isc,er :today =o - at t,e 7ederal 1eserve)! in ,is ca#acity as a senior officer
    of t,e 'nternational 5onetary 7und :'57)! at t,e service of 2S agencies3 B
    c(c
    C
    l) Le(is et al v 8leason et al
    /igure 490 () J+$"e -hris&ine @. Ar"+ello, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Dis&ri,& o' -oloar$o
    'n Leis et al v. Gleason et al :1G18-cv-81$58) in t,e 2S District )ourt! )olorado! @erald De+is
    and %lison 5aynard! in #ro se! filed com#laint #ursuant to
    !eprivation of *ights under the Color of La 4- 2S) J1*$3 in t,e 2S District )ourt! )olorado!
    against Jo,n @leason! )ounsel at t,e )olorado Su#reme )ourt ;ffice of %ttorney 1egulation and
    ot,ers! including! but not limited to! Justices of t,e )olorado Su#reme )ourt Hilliam Ducero! 5ary
    5ullarey! @regory J3 Aobbs! Jr3 ! and 5ic,ael >ender3 9,e matter arose from disci#linary actions
    taen against 5aynard and ,er former client De+is! alleged by t,e Plaintiffs as de#rivation of rig,ts
    and retaliation for e(#osing corru#tion in t,e State of )olorado courts3
    9,e 2S District )ourt docet lists 2S Judge ),ristine 53 %rguello as Presiding Judge in t,e case3
    %ccording to t,e Denver Post! Judge %rguello +as set in -88* for a 2S Su#reme )ourt Justice
    #osition3 Bi(C
    2S 5agistrate 5ic,ael J3 Hatanabe is listed as #residing by reference in t,e case3
    Public access to t,e =.7s :=otices of .lectronic 7iling) is denied in P%).1 :t,e )ourtRs electronic
    #ublic access system)3 9,e =.7s today are deemed by t,e 2S courts as t,e re#lacement of
    certificates by t,e )ler3
    9,erefore! t,e e(amination belo+ is limited to t,e records! +,ic, are accessible in P%).13 B
    c(ci
    C
    .he $AC(* !oc&et *eport and !oc&et *ecords
    +/t @A# ( )om#laintG 9,e docet te(t notesG /Summons 'ssued03 Ao+ever! t,e summonses as
    issued by t,e )ler +ere not doceted! in alleged violation of t,e 7ederal 1ules of )ivil Procedure!
    +,ic, reIuire doceting of t,e summonses3
    9,e summonses are not listed even as an attac,ment3 9,erefore! t,ere could not #ossibly be a valid
    =.7 for t,e summonses as issued by cler3 9,erefore! t,e summonses as issued by t,e )ler s,ould
    be deemed invalid3
    +/t @A0 - Detter 1eassigning )aseG 9,e Detter fails to include valid and effectual language suc, as
    /;rder0 or /=otice03 'nstead! it is /advised0 t,at t,e case is reassigned3 5oreover! t,e Detter
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    80/163 TOC:2
    s#ecifically refers to t,e =otice of .lectronic 7iling :=.7) as integral #art of t,e Detter3 Ao+ever!
    #ublic access to t,e =.7 is denied3 'n ot,er cases in t,e 2S district courts! %ssignment ;rders +ere
    issued +it, invalid =.7s3 9,erefore! t,ere is no +ay to establis, +,et,er t,ere is valid
    reassignment in t,e cas for Judge %rguello3 B(C 9,e Detter s,ould be deemed vague and ambiguous
    at best3
    +/t @A1 - ;rder 1eferring )ase to 5agistrate Judge Lat,leen 53 9afoyaG %s noted in t,e docet! no
    record is lined to t,e doceting te(t /9.<9 ;=D? .=91? - =; D;)25.=9 %99%)A.D03 %t
    t,e same time! t,e docet te(t refers to an /;1D.10 />y Judge ),ristine 53 %rguello03 Since t,e
    docet itself states t,at no record +as doceted! it could not #ossibly be certified by Judge %rguello3
    9,erefore! it s,ould be deemed invalid docet notation3
    +/t @A4 - Detter 1eassigning )ase to 5agistrate Judge 5ic,ael J3 HatanabeG See Dt Q83! above3
    +/t @#A - 5otion for .(tension of 9ime to file returns of serviceG 9,e 5otion is listed in t,e docet3
    Ao+ever! it is missing from t,e 1elated 9ransactions 1e#ort3
    +/t @#% - Summons 1eturned .(ecuted as to Kictor >oogG 9,e e(ecuted summons +as doceted!
    and t,erefore t,e summons as issued can be e(aminedG 9,e summons as issued by )ler include an
    invalid legal signature bo(G =o name of an individual De#uty )ler a##ears under t,e signature
    line3 't s,ould also be noted t,at filing of t,e summons as e(ecuted bears t,e /7'D.D0 stam#! dated
    /Se#tember -3! -81803 Ao+ever! t,e name and t,e ,and signature of an individual De#uty )ler are
    missing from t,e stam#3 't s,ould be furt,er noted t,at t,e 1elated 9ransactions 1e#ort failed to list
    t,e issuance of summons! not even as te(t related to t,e )om#laint :Dt Q81)3 9,e Summonses! as
    e(ecuted :Dt Q11-3-) are not listed as related to any transaction! and service of t,e summonses is
    not listed as /terminated03
    +/t @#; ( 5emorandum regarding 18 5otion for .(tension of 9imeG 9,ere is no record lined to
    t,e notation /9.<9 ;=D? .=91? - =; D;)25.=9 %99%)A.D03 9,erefore! t,ere is no
    certification of t,e 5emorandum by Judge %rguello3 't s,ould also be noted t,at Dt Q1*! lie t,at
    5otion :Dt Q18) itself! ,as no designated /bo(0 in t,e 1elated 9ransactions 1e#ort3 9,erefore! no
    transaction +as o#ened! and no transaction +as terminated3
    +/t @06 - 5inutesG =o name of a De#uty )ler a##ears in t,e 5inutes3 9,erefore! t,e record
    cannot be deemed a valid record of 5inutes of t,e 2S District )ourt3 9,e 5inutes #ur#ort to rule
    on t,e 5otion :Dt Q18)3 Ao+ever! t,e 5otion +as never listed as an o#en transaction in t,e
    1elated 9ransactions 1e#ort3
    +/t @10 - 5emorandum regarding 4- 5otionG See Dt Q1*! above3
    +/t @16 - 5emorandum regarding 47 5otionG Ditto3
    +/t @1; - ;rder granting 47 State DefendantsE 5otion for .nlargement of 9ime3 7alse doceting
    te(t3 9,e lined record is titled 5inutes! and s,ould be deemed invalid court record! see Dt Q3$!
    above3
    +/t @33 - 5emorandum regarding 54 5otionG See Dt Q1*! above3
    +/t @4% - )ertificate of Service by 5ail by )lerG %bsent a valid =.7! t,e docet notation cannot
    be deemed a valid court record3
    +/t @41 - 5emorandum 1egarding 63 5otionG See Dt Q1*! above3
    +/t @45 - 5inute ;rder granting 63 State DefendantsE 5otion to Stay DiscoveryG See Dt Q3$!
    above3
    +/t @5# - 5emorandum 1egarding 78 5otionG See Dt Q1*! above3
    +/t @56 - ;rder granting in #art and denying in #art 76 5otionG Ditto3
    +/t @6; - 5emorandum 1egarding $$ 5otionG Ditto3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    81/163 TOC:2
    +/t @;# - 5inutesG See Dt Q3$! above3
    +/t @;0 - 5emorandum 1egarding *4 5otionG See Dt Q1*! above3
    +/t @#A% - 5emorandum 1egarding 188 5otionG Ditto3
    +/t @#A1 - 5inute ;rder 1egarding 5otion for .ntry ;f DefaultG See Dt Q3$! above3
    *elated $AC(* *ecords
    1elated 9ransactions 1e#ortG %s noted in a)! above! t,e 1elated 9ransactions 1e#ort includes
    invalid or missing entries for multi#le records3
    Pending Statuses 1e#ortG 9,e 1e#ort statesG
    There Are Co Pen$in" )&a&+s <e,or$s >or This -ase.
    Co s&a&+ses have .een &er%ina&e$ 'or &his ,ase.
    Conclusions
    9,e records! +,ic, +ere e(amined in Leis et al v. Gleason et al :1G18-cv-81$58)! are incom#lete3
    Public access is denied in t,e P%).1 docets to t,e =.7s :=otices of .lectronic 7iling)! +,ic, are
    deemed today by t,e 2S district courts t,e electronic certificates of aut,entication6attestation by t,e
    )ler3
    'n case t,e Plaintiffs ,ave in t,eir #ossession co#ies of t,e =.7s! it is recommended t,at t,ey
    #rovide co#ies of t,e =.7s #ertaining to t,e records! docet numbers of +,ic, are listed above3 'n
    case Plaintiff ,ad no access to )56.)7 so far! and got no electronic notices! it is ,ig,ly
    recommended t,at t,ey mae efforts and #ress to gain access to t,e =.7s! follo+ing ste#s! +,ic,
    are outlined in t,e lin belo+3 B(iC
    1egardless of t,e missing =.7s! sufficient evidence is found in t,e docet and related records of
    Leis et al v. Gleason et al :1G18-cv-81$58) as detailed in ii3! above! of notations! stating t,e entry
    of records by individuals! +,ose names and aut,ority are not s#elled out in t,e P%).1 docet!
    #ertaining to 4udicial and clerical records! +,ic, are #atently invalid court records3
    9,erefore! t,e Docet 1e#ort of Leis et al v. Gleason et al :1G18-cv-81$58) is false
    and deliberately misleading! meticulously constructed to convey t,e #erce#tion of valid litigation!
    +,ere in fact t,e evidence indicates t,at t,e litigation +as and is deliberately invalid from its
    commencement3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    82/163 TOC:2
    m) Log Cabin Republicans v ,S$ et al
    /igure 200 $n %og a(in Repu(licans v USA et al, J+$"e Nir"inia Phillips, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,&
    o' -ali'ornia, ,on$+,&e$ 'or %an* %on&hs 'ra+$ on &he ,o+r& in a %a&&er &ha& o,,+pie$ &he () Presi$en&, &he
    () -on"ress, &he () Ar%e$ >or,es, an$ &he () p+.li,, an$ /hi,h /as &he ,en&er o' %e$ia a&&en&ion.
    Log Ca+in *epu+licans v United States of America et al :-G84-cv-8$4-5) in t,e 2S District )ourt!
    )entral District of )alifornia c,allenged President )lintonEs &DonEt %s DonEt 9ell& #olicy regarding
    t,e service of gay #ersons in t,e 2S armed forces3
    9,e case is uniIue! since Plaintiffs! Dog )abin 1e#ublicans retained a baning la+ firm! +,ic,
    em#loyed 7raud u#on t,e )ourt met,ods in order to secure )ivil and )onstitutional 1ig,ts in a case
    t,at attracted substantial national and international attention3
    9,e P%).1 docet and records >
    cxcii
    ? of t,e case made it evident all along t,at t,e case in t,e 2S
    District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia under Judge Kirginia P,illi#s and )ler 9erry =afisi!
    amounted to 7raud on t,e )ourtG
    2S Judges @eorge Sc,iavelli and Kirginia P,illi#s a##eared as Presiding Judges in t,e case! bot,
    +it, no %ssignment ;rders3 %bsent %ssignment ;rder in a s#ecific case! a 2S 4udge ,as no
    aut,ority to ad4udicate in t,e matter3
    'n -884 Judge Sc,iavelli issued a 4udgment in t,e case! in favor of t,e 2nited States3 9,e
    4udgment +as listed in t,e P%).1 docet as /entered0! and +as listed in t,e Judgment 'nde( of
    t,e )ourt3
    )onseIuently! t,e case +as deemed /closed0 by court staff3 Ao+ever! access to t,e certification
    of t,e -884 4udgment is denied3
    9,e -884 Judge Sc,iavelli /Judgment0 +as never overturned t,roug, an a##eal! or any ot,er
    4udicial #roceeding3
    'n -818 Judge P,illi#s a##eared in t,e case and issued t,e o##osing 4udgment! in favor of t,e
    Dog )abin 1e#ublicans3 9,e -818 4udgment +as again listed in t,e docet as /entered0! but +as
    not listed in t,e Judgment 'nde( of t,e )ourt3 %ccess to t,e certification of t,e -884 4udgment is
    denied as +ell3
    )ler of t,e District )ourt 9erry =afisi ,ad #reviously denied access to t,ese records! in #atent
    disregard of 7irst %mendment and )ommon Da+ rig,ts to access court records3
    7reedom of 'nformation res#onse by t,e 2S De#artment of Justice +as substandard! yet it #rovided
    t,e definitive evidence of t,e conduct of simulated litigation in t,e 2S District )ourt! Sout,ern
    District of )aliforniaGB
    c(ciii
    C
    % simulated summons record! missing t,e seal of t,e court! reIuired by 2S la+3 B
    c(civ
    C
    % simulated! invalid aut,entication record :=.7) for t,e ;ctober -818 Judgment by Judge
    Kirginia P,illi#s! missing t,e .lectronic Document Stam#! reIuired by t,e @eneral ;rder 8$-8-
    of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia3 B
    c(cv
    C
    9,e 7;'% res#onse +as also notable in t,e record t,at it failed to #rovideG
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    83/163 TOC:2
    %ssignment ;rder for Judge @eorge Sc,iavelli
    %ssignment ;rder for Judge Kirginia P,illi#s
    %ut,entication records :=.7s) for various 5inutes and ;rders by eit,er Judges3
    Suc, 7raud on t,e 2S )ourts from coast to coast ,as been ty#ically reserved for cases! +,ere t,e
    civil rig,ts of individuals are abused to benefit bans! large cor#orations! and corru#t government
    officials3 %##arently! Dog )abin 1e#ublicans got +ealt,y and influential enoug, to #urc,ase 7raud
    on t,e )ourt t,roug, t,e services of a large baning la+ firm - )ase O H,ite! DDP3 9,e case of
    Dog )abin 1e#ublicans is t,e first to document 7raud on t,e )ourt for t,e #rotection of civil
    rig,ts333
    Judge Kirginia P,illi#s is one of a series of )alifornia and 2S 4udges! +,o refused to ans+er on
    reIuests to disclose financial benefits to t,em! if any! by >an ;f %merica! +,ile continuing to
    engage in 7raud on t,e )ourt in cases involving >an ;f %merica3 >
    cxcvi
    ?
    7raud on t,e )ourts is ty#ically reserved for cases! +,ere t,e civil rig,ts of individuals are abused
    to benefit bans! large cor#orations! and corru#t government officials3 9,e case of Dog )abin
    1e#ublicans is t,e first to document t,e same for t,e #rotection of civil rig,ts3
    n) Log Cabin Republicans in the ,S Court of $ppeals, :th Circuit
    /igure 210 %og a(in Repu(licans v USA et al, a lan$%ark ,ase o' na&ional si"ni'i,an,e, /as s+.je,&e$ &o
    si%+la&e$ appeal pro,e$+res in &he A&h -ir,+i& -o+r& o' Appeals +n$er J+$"es #illia% -an.*, Jr, 9$/ar$
    Feav*, Ar&h+r F Alar,on, Diar%+i$ > OL),annlain, Barr* B )ilver%an,
    >ot, #arties to t,e litigation of Log Ca+in *epu+licans v USA et al in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral
    District of )alifornia a##ealed t,e Judge Kirginia P,illi#s void! simulated Judgment3 9,e a##eal in
    t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! is of #articular interest! since bot, #arties and t,e )ourt of
    %##eals continued t,e simulated a##eal #rocess! even after being reliably informed of t,e invalidity
    of t,e Judgment! from +,ic, t,e a##eal +as taen3 B
    c(cvii
    C
    9,e 2S )ourt of %##eals ,olds 4urisdiction to conduct a##eals only from valid and effectual!
    certified 4udgments! not from void ones3 Since t,e records of case in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral
    District of )alifornia +ere #atently invalid! t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! ,ad no
    4urisdiction in t,e a##eal in Log Ca+in *epu+licans v USA et al.
    %ccordingly! notice +as served on counsel for bot, #arties in t,e a##eal - Dog )abin 1e#ublicans
    and t,e 2S3 B
    c(cviii
    C 9,e notice #rovided a co#y of reIuest for investigation! and if a##ro#riate N
    im#eac,ment #roceedings - against )ler of t,e )ourt 9erry =afisi! #ertaining to matters including!
    but not limited to Log Ca+in *epu+licans v United States of America et al :-G84-cv-8$4-5) - alleged
    as #retense litigation and 7raud on t,e )ourts3
    9,e notice stated t,at t,e evidence in t,e matter s,o+ed t,at bot, 4udgments #ublis,ed in t,e case!
    one in favor of t,e 2nited States - dismissing t,e #etition for in4unction! and t,e ot,er in favor of
    t,e Dog )abin 1e#ublicans - granting a #ermanent in4unction! +ere issued by 4udges acting +it, no
    due %ssignment ;rders! and +it, no aut,ority at all3
    5oreover! t,e notice stated t,at t,e litigation records! as a +,ole! s,o+ed litigation t,at ,ad been
    conducted in a manner t,at +as ine(#licable relative to #rovisions of t,e 7ederal 1ules of )ivil
    Procedure and t,e )ivil Ditigation 5anagement 5anual! #ublis,ed by t,e Judicial )onference of
    t,e 2nited States3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    84/163 TOC:2
    9,e #arties continued t,e litigation of t,e a##eal nevert,eless3
    9,e records in t,e a##eal could not #ossibly be deemed valid legal records of t,e 2S )ourt of
    %##eals! *t, )ircuit! eit,erG
    % docet +as o#ened for t,e a##eal by t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals )ler 5olly ) D+yer from an
    uncertified 4udgment3 9,e )ler of t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals s,ould ,ave refused to o#en a
    docet from an uncertified 4udgment of t,e 2S District )ourt3
    9,e #ur#orted orders by t,e )ircuit Judges in t,e %##eal are all unsigned records3
    9,e )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit denied a reIuest for certification of t,e docet of t,e %##eal3
    H,ile t,e a##eal +as #ur#ortedly before t,e *t, )ircuit )ourt! Dr Ferni filed a motion to
    intervene! #roviding detailed evidence of t,e 7raud on t,e )ourt in t,e litigation of t,e case3
    1egardless! t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals continued t,e litigation of t,e simulated a##eal from t,e
    simulated District )ourt 4udgment! +,ic, +as concluded in a #ublis,ed simulated o#inion3 >
    cxcix
    ?
    %dditional records! related to t,e a##eal of Dog )abin 1e#ublicans v 2S% et al are #rovided3 B
    cc
    C
    o) Citi#ens ,nited v Federal )lection Commission in the ,S District Court, DC
    /igure 220 () -hie' J+$"e <o*,e -. Fa%.er&h, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-. In &he li&i"a&ion o' a
    lan$%ark ,ase .* a -hie' J+$"e &here is an invali$ .e"innin", an invali$ en$, an$ an o'' &he re,or$M
    pro,ee$in" in .e&/een.
    Citi,ens United v Federal (lection Commission :7.)) :8$--85) is no doubt one of t,e landmar
    decisions of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt3 /BDCecision ,olding t,at cor#orations and unions can s#end
    unlimited amounts of money in election cam#aignsU a stunning e(am#le of 4udicial activismU0
    B
    cci
    C Ao+ever! a valid and effectual co#y of t,e 7ebruary --! -818 Judgment of t,e 2S Su#reme
    )ourt in t,e case N a ,istoric document N is yet to be discoveredU B
    ccii
    !
    cciii
    C
    1evie+ of t,e litigation records of Citi,ens United v F(C :1G87-cv---48) in t,e 2S District )ourt!
    Has,ington D)! +,ere t,e case originated! demonstrates simulated - an invalid beginning! an
    invalid end! and an Soff t,e recordR #roceeding in bet+een3B
    cciv
    C
    *evie of court records B
    ccv
    C
    9,e case as a +,ole s,o+s invalid docet records! including! but not limited toG
    Summons as issued
    Summons as e(ecuted
    5inutes
    2S Su#reme )ourt Judgment3
    Judgment 'nde(
    9,erefore! t,e case as a +,ole is o#ined as Simulated Ditigation3
    See also records and comments on validity! or lac t,ereof! of records of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt in
    t,e corres#onding case N Citi,ens United v Federal (lections Commission :8$--85)! section )-#3
    Comments
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    85/163 TOC:2
    #! ,S +istrict Court 9ACER +oc/et
    9,e P%).1 docet as a +,ole is o#ined as an invalid docetG
    a3 %s #reviously s,o+n in ot,er cases! t,e P%).1 docets of t,e 2S District )ourt! in
    t,emselves! are no guarantee of valid litigation3 B
    ccvi
    C
    b3 't s,ould be noted t,at t,e aut,ority of t,e )ler of t,e 2S District )ourt =ancy 5ayer-
    H,ittington! is never invoed in t,e P%).1 docet per se3
    c! 9,e only record! +,ere t,e aut,ority of )ler of t,e )ourt is invoed in t,is case! is t,e
    Summons :Dt Q15)! see belo+! and t,at record is o#ined as an invalid Summons! since it fails to
    s,o+ t,e Seal of t,e )ourt3
    %! +ecember #0' %AA5 Summons as issue&
    =o valid record of t,e Summons as issued e(istsG
    a3 9,e Summons as issued ,as no Docet =umber designated! and no lin to a record3
    9,erefore! no =.7 could #ossibly be issued! and t,e Summons as issued is not aut,enticated and no
    deemed entered by t,e )ourt3
    b3 9,e Summons as issued +as not doceted! in a##arent violation of t,e Federal *ules of Civil
    $rocedure3
    0! +ec #5' %AA5 Summons as execute&' (+/t @#3)
    9,e record! +,ic, a##ears in t,e P%).1 docet as Summons! as e(ecuted on 7ederal .lection
    )ommission! is an invalid Summons recordG
    a3 9,e record of t,e Summons as e(ecuted on 7ederal .lection )ommission :Dt Q15) is an invalid
    record! since it fails to s,o+ t,e Seal of )ourt! as reIuired by 2S la+3
    b3 7;'% reIuest +as filed +it, t,e 7ederal .lection )ommission for t,e record! in order to e(clude
    t,e #ossibility t,at t,e Seal of t,e )ourt +as missing as a result of #,otoco#ying or scanning3 B
    ccvii
    C
    c3 Since t,e Summons record is t,e only record in t,e docet t,at could #ossibly be deemed as t,e
    record of %ssignment of t,e case to Judge Dambert! t,ere is no valid %ssignment to a 4udge! eit,er3
    1! -anuar #A' %AA6 7inutes of 9rocee&ing before Three -u&ge 9anel
    =o valid record e(ists for t,e January 18! -88$ 5inutesG
    a3 9,e January 18! -88$ 5inutes of Proceeding before 9,ree Judge Panel N t,e only 5inutes of
    #roceeding! listed in t,e docet - +as not doceted! in a##arent violation of t,e Federal *ules of
    Civil $rocedure3
    b3 9,e January 18! -88$ 5inutes of Proceeding before 9,ree Judge Panel ,as no Docet =umber
    designated! and no lin to a record3 9,erefore! no 5inutes record could #ossibly be issued! and t,e
    5inutes record! if one e(ists! is not aut,enticated and no deemed entered by t,e )ourt3 B
    ccviii
    C
    3! .eb %1' %A#A ,S Su$reme Court -u&gment' as it a$$ears in the ,S +istrict Court +oc/et
    (+/t @50) B
    cci(
    C
    9,e record! +,ic, a##ears in t,e P%).1 docet as 7eb -4! -818 2S Su#reme )ourt Judgment! is
    an invalid Judgment recordG
    a3 't is a record dated January -1! -818! +,ereas t,e online docet of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt noted
    t,e issuance of a Judgment on 7ebruary --! -8183
    b3 't is an unsigned record! +,ic, bears a stam# certifying t,at it is a /true co#y0 of an
    unsigned original record3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    86/163 TOC:2
    c3 9,e stam# itself is signed! but not dated3 5oreover! t,e name and aut,ority of t,e #erson +,o
    signed t,e stam# :)ynt,ia 1a##) +ere not #rinted belo+ t,e signature line3 9,erefore! t,e signature
    on t,e stam#! certifying /true co#y0 is invalid as +ell3
    d3 =o aut,entication by t,e )ler of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt +as filed +it, t,e Judgment record3 B
    cc(
    C
    4! +oc/et notation of the .eb %1' %A#A ,S Su$reme Court -u&gment' as it a$$ears in the ,S
    +istrict Court +oc/et (+/t @50)
    9,e P%).1 docet notation of t,e 7eb -4! -818 2S Su#reme )ourt Judgment! is an invalid
    notationG
    a3 9,e docet notation states t,at t,e record +as filed by Plaintiff )iti"ens 2nited! but no face #age
    or notice by )iti"ens 2nited +as filed +it, t,e record3
    b3 9,e filer /"nm+0 is not counsel for )iti"ens 2nited! but a court em#loyee! +,ose name and
    aut,ority remain unno+n! as is made clear by t,e Docet %ctivity 1e#ort
    c3 9,e Judgment is not /as to 67 =otice of %##eal0
    5! NE. of the .eb %1' %A#A ,S Su$reme Court -u&gment' as it a$$ears in the ,S +istrict
    Court +oc/et (+/t @50)
    9,e =.7 of t,e 7eb -4! -818 2S Su#reme )ourt Judgment is an invalid aut,entication recordG
    a3 %s noted above! t,e docet notation states t,at t,e record +as filed by Plaintiff )iti"ens 2nited!
    but t,e =.7 +as issued by a court em#loyee /"nm+0! +,ose identity and aut,ority as De#uty )ler
    remains unno+n3
    b3 =o /7iler =ame0 is listed in t,e =.7
    c3 =o /;riginal filename0 is listed in t,e =.7
    6! Relate& Transactions Re$ort
    9,e 1elated 9ransaction 1e#ort s,o+s litigation! +,ere t,e com#laint +as never terminated! or
    dis#osedG
    a3 9,e com#laint +as never listed as 9erminated! albeit! Summary Judgment +as #ur#ortedly
    entered by t,e 2S District )ourt! and an additional Judgment +as #ur#ortedly entered by t,e 2S
    Su#reme )ourt! after a##eal3
    9,e Judgment 'nde( s,o+s litigation! +,ere t,e com#laint +as never terminated! or dis#osedG
    a3 =o Judgment is listed as entered in t,e Judgment 'nde(
    Conclusion
    >ased on revie+ of t,e attac,ed P%).1 and )56.)7 records of t,e 2S District )ourt! Has,ington
    D)! t,e case of Citi,ens United v Federal (lection Commission :1G87-cv---48) s,ould be deemed
    simulated Ditigation3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    87/163 TOC:2
    /igure 2=0 Invali$ PA-9< )+%%ons o' -i&izens (ni&e$ v >9- in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, D-. The re,or$ 'ails &o
    sho/ &he )eal o' &he -o+r&.
    Summons as e(ecuted N 9,e record of t,e Summons as e(ecuted on 7ederal .lection )ommission
    :Dt Q15) is an invalid record! since it fails to s,o+ t,e Seal of )ourt! as reIuired by 2S la+3 %
    re#eat 7;'% reIuest +as filed! in order to e(clude t,e #ossibility t,at t,e Seal of t,e )ourt +as
    missing as a result of #,otoco#ying or scanning3
    /igure 240 Invali$ PA-9< $o,ke& no&a&ion o' @in+&es o' &he Jan+ar* 10, 600I pro,ee$in" in iti.ens United
    v #). Co $o,ke& n+%.er /as $esi"na&e$, an$ no re,or$ o' &he @in+&es /as linke$ &o &he $o,ke& no&a&ion.
    5inutes N =o valid record at all e(ists for t,e January 18! -88$ #roceeding! t,e only #roceeding
    listed in t,e record of t,e case3 'nvalid notation +as created in t,e docet! +it, no record lined to it
    at all3 .ffectively! it +as an Soff t,e recordR #roceeding of t,e court3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    88/163 TOC:2
    013103600I @in+&e 9n&r* Pro,ee$in"s hel$ .e'ore a Three J+$"e Panel o' -ir,+i& J+$"e A <a*%on$
    <an$olph an$ (ni&e$ )&a&es Dis&ri,& J+$"es <o*,e -. Fa%.er&h an$ <i,har$ #. <o.er&s 8 Preli%inar*
    Inj+n,&ion hel$ on 13103600I. 2-o+r& <epor&er #en$* <i,ar$.4 2rje4 29n&ere$8 013103600I4
    /igure 220 Invali$, si%+la&e$ re,or$ o' &he >e.r+ar* 66, 6010 J+$"%en& in iti.ens United v #ederal
    )lection ommission in &he () )+pre%e -o+r&, as i& appears in &he PA-9< $o,ke& o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&.
    The re,or$ is no& a KJ+$"%en&K a& all, .+& a no&i,e re"ar$in" a&&orne*s 'ees.
    2S Su#reme )ourt Judgment N 9,e Judgment record! as it a##ears in t,e docet of t,e 2S District
    )ourt! is unsigned! and fails to include aut,entication by t,e )ler of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt3
    /igure 2@0 The iti.ens United v #) en&r* in &he J+$"%en& In$ex o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, D-.
    J+$"%en& In$ex R Co J+$"%en& a& all is lis&e$ in &he -o+r&Ms J+$"%en& In$ex 'or &he ,ase, an$ &he ,o%plain&
    is lis&e$ as never &er%ina&e$ in &he <ela&e$ Transa,&ions <epor&.
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    89/163 TOC:2
    J+$"%en& In$ex <epor&
    (.). Dis&ri,& -o+r& R R Dis&ri,& o' -ol+%.ia
    <epor& Perio$8 0130136007 R 0736336011
    )orr* R no $a&a 'or &he ,hosen sele,&ion ,ri&eria
    J+$"%en& In$ex <epor& )ele,&ion -ri&eria
    -ase n+%.er 1807!,v!6640
    p) Citi#ens ,nited v Federal )lection Commission in the ,S Supreme Court
    /igure 2A0 -i&izens (ni&e$ is ar"+a.l* &he %os& si"ni'i,an& $e,ision o' &he )+pre%e -o+r& in re,en&
    $e,a$es. The )+pre%e -o+r&Ls >e.r+ar* 66, 6010 J+$"%en& re,or$s in &his ,ase is %issin". (C repor&
    ,onsi$er %issin" ,o+r& re,or$s a ,ar$inal si"n o' j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion.
    Citi,ens United v Federal (lection Commission 9F(C= :8$--85) is no doubt one of t,e landmar
    decisions of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt in recent decades! if not in its entire ,istory3 't transformed t,e
    2S #olitical #rocess by e(#anding t,e notion of &cor#orate #erson,ood& by according cor#orations
    t,e 7ree S#eec, rig,ts and t,e rig,t to &s#end unlimited amounts of money in election cam#aignsU
    a stunning e(am#le of 4udicial activismU0 B
    cc(i
    C 't +as also described as a license to corru#t
    government3
    9,e 2S Su#reme )ourt docet notes t,at on 7ebruary --! -818 4udgment +as &issued& :but not
    &entered&)3
    /igure 2B0 9x,erp&s 'ro% &he online $o,ke& o' &he () )+pre%e -o+r& in iti.ens United v #ederal )lection
    ommission
    Ao+ever! t,e record of t,e 7ebruary --! -818 Judgment in t,e case - a ,istoric document - is yet to
    be discovered333 =o suc, record +as discovered among t,e electronic records of t,e 2S Su#reme
    )ourt3 B
    cc(ii
    C
    't s,ould be noted t,at 2= 2nited =ations 'nternational )rime Prevention )enter re#orts on
    &Strengt,ening Judicial 'ntegrity& list missing court records as a cardinal sign of 4udicial corru#tion3
    B
    cc(iii
    !
    cc(iv
    C
    9,e online records of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt B
    cc(v
    C also s,o+ t,at t,e Journal for January -1! -818!
    t,e date of t,e missing 4udgment record! is also missing t,e ty#ical introductory remar! found in
    many :but not all) dates of seating of t,e Su#reme )ourt! regarding certification and entry of orders
    and decisions3
    7or e(am#le! on January -5! -818! t,e immediate ne(t seating of t,e )ourt! t,e Journal saysG
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    90/163 TOC:2
    The -hie' J+s&i,e sai$8
    K#e have iss+e$ or$ers &o$a*, &he* have .een $+l* en&ere$ an$ ,er&i'ie$, an$ 'ile$ /i&h &he -lerk.K
    D+n$erline a$$e$ !jzE
    9,erefore! concern must be furt,er raised t,at t,e missing 4udgment in t,is case +as never entered
    and certified as a valid 4udgment of t,e Su#reme )ourt3
    7ollo+ing t,e failure to discover t,e 4udgment record among t,e electronic records of t,e Su#reme
    )ourt! 7reedom of 'nformation reIuests +ere filed on t,e 7ederal .lection )ommission! on t,e
    )ivil Division of t,e 2S De#artment of Justice and on t,e 2S Solicitor @eneral! reIuesting from
    eac, a co#y of t,e 7ebruary --! -818 Judgment and its aut,entication records! as served on t,em by
    t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt3
    ;n 5ay *! -811 7reedom of 'nformation %ct :7;'%) res#onse +as received from Defendant 7.)3
    B
    cc(vi
    C
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    91/163 TOC:2
    /igure 290 The re,or$ &ha& /as provi$e$ .* >9- as &he >e.r+ar* 66, 6010 J+$"%en& in iti.ens United v
    #ederal )lection ommission ,o%.ine$ /i&h i&s a+&hen&i,a&ion .* &he -lerk o' &he () )+pre%e -o+r&. The
    re,or$ is no& a KJ+$"%en&K a& all, .+& a no&i,e 'ro% &he -lerk o' &he -o+r& re"ar$in" a&&orne*s 'ees.
    9,e 4udgment record! +,ic, +as #rovided by 7.) in its 7;'% res#onse cannot #ossibly be deemed
    a valid court recordG
    9,e record is dated January -1! -818! +,ereas t,e online docet noted t,e issuance of a
    Judgment on 7ebruary --! -8183
    9,e record is not signed by any 4ustice of t,e Su#reme )ourt! and it bears a stam# certifying t,at
    it is a /% true co#y0! but not &9rue )o#y of t,e ;riginal&! t,e valid certification statement3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    92/163 TOC:2
    9,e stam# on t,e record is signed! but not dated3 5oreover! t,e name and aut,ority of t,e #erson
    +,o signed t,e stam# :)ynt,ia 1a##) +ere not #rinted belo+ t,e signature line3 9,erefore! t,e
    signature on t,e stam#! certifying /% true co#y0 is of dubious validity at best3
    )ontrary to +,at +as stated in t,e 7;'% res#onse letter! t,e record! +,ic, +as #rovided! did not
    include true and valid attestation6aut,entication by t,e )ler of t,e Su#reme )ourt of t,e 2nited
    States3
    August 0' %AA; ( Civil Cover Sheet (+/t @none) - alt,oug, records of t,e 2S District )ourt!
    Sout,ern District of =e+ ?or! state t,at a )ivil )over S,eet is reIuired +,en filing a com#laint!
    no )ivil )over S,eet +as found in t,e docet of t,e case at ,and3 'n contrast! )ivil )over S,eets
    are routinely found doceted in P%).1 +it, t,e com#laints in ot,er cases3 %s furt,er noted in t,e
    1ules of )ourt! t,e )ivil )over S,eet must be #art of Service of Process! toget,er +it, t,e
    summons and com#laint3
    9,e failure to file and docet a )ivil )over S,eet is of #articular significance! since it is one of t,e
    only records! +,ere a ,and signature of a De#uty )ler of t,e )ourt! identified by name and
    aut,ority! is reIuired3 %29A.=9')%9';= - %n attestation made by a #ro#er officer! by +,ic, ,e
    certifies t,at a record is in due form of la+! and t,at t,e #erson +,o certifies it is t,e officer
    a##ointed by la+ to do soU >y aut,entication is also understood +,atever act is done eit,er by t,e
    #arty or some ot,er #erson +it, a vie+ of causing an instrument to be no+n and identified3
    9,e record! is not a record +,ic, +as served on 7.) by t,e Su#reme )ourt! but a record t,at
    +as #rinted out from t,e P%).1 docet of t,e 2S )ourt! District of )olumbia3 as documented
    in t,e record ,eader3 Ao+ever! to t,e degree t,at t,e record! +,ic, +as #rovided! +as a record
    filed and entered in t,e 2S )ourt! District of )olumbia! it +as missing t,e =.7 :=otice of
    .lectronic 7iling)! +,ic, is deemed by t,e 2S district courts as t,e aut,entication record under
    electronic filing3 B
    cc(vii
    C
    9,e 5arc, -*! -811 res#onse on t,e 7;'% reIuest from ;ffice of Solicitor @eneral! statesG
    Cei&her o' &hese re,or$s /ere 'o+n$ in revie/ o' re,or$s %ain&aine$ .* &he O''i,e o' &he )oli,i&or
    Beneral 2O)B4.
    9,e 5arc, -4! -811 res#onse from t,e )ivil Division of t,e 2S De#artment of Justice to 7;'%
    reIuest statesG
    The -ivil Division $oes no& %ain&ain re,or$s rela&in" &o &ha& ,ase.
    1eIuests for co#ies of t,e missing 4udgment +ere also for+arded to #arties in t,e case3 ;nly one
    #arty res#onded! saying t,at t,e 7ebruary --! -818 Judgment ,ad never been served nor noticed3
    =o #arty res#onded t,at a 7ebruary --! -818 Judgment +as eit,er noticed or served3
    't s,ould be noted t,at t,e notion of &cor#orate #erson,ood&! +,ic, +as t,e #ur#orted legal
    foundation for t,e litigation in Citi,ens United v F(C originates in a 1$$6 Su#reme )ourt decision!
    +,ic, in itself s,ould be deemed an early e(am#le of a simulated record of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt!
    during anot,er #eriod of remarable corru#tion of t,e 2S courts3 9,e only reference in in Santa
    Clara County v. Southern $acific *ailroad) 11$ 23S3 3*4 :1$$6) to &cor#orate #erson,ood& is in a
    ,eadnote added by t,e court re#orter! but not in t,e body of t,e decision itself3
    9,e 2S Su#reme )ourtRs case management system! a ey to establis,ing t,e validity! or lac
    t,ereof! of various Su#reme )ourt records! remains under a veil of secrecy! in a##arent violation of
    7irst %mendment and Due Process rig,ts3 )laims of online #ublication of false and deliberately
    misleading records by t,e office of t,e )ler of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt +ere #art of t,e #revious
    reIuest for im#eac,ment of )ler Hilliam Suter3 B
    cc(viii
    C
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    93/163 TOC:2
    +! National authorities' civil societ organi)ations' ex$erts' me&ia
    #! Office of Attorne General' ,S +e$artment of -ustice' an& ."*
    9,e 7>'Es official #olicy is reflected in t,e follo+ing #assageG B
    cc(i(
    C
    KThis ,ase sho+l$ $e%ons&ra&e &ha& &he >BI /ill p+rs+e all alle"a&ions o' j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion vi"oro+sl*,
    as p+.li, ,orr+p&ion viola&ions are a%on" &he %os& serio+s o' all ,ri%inal ,on$+,& an$ ,an &ear a& &he
    'a.ri, o' a $e%o,ra&i, so,ie&*,K sai$ John >. Pik+s, spe,ial a"en& in ,har"e o' &he Al.an* $ivision, in a
    prepare$ s&a&e%en&.
    Ao+ever! t,e evidence s,o+s t,at in #ractice! 7>' ,ardly ever investigates com#laints of corru#tion
    of state and 2S 4udges3
    'n no case! +,ere la+ enforcement agencies +ere informed of t,e corru#tion and criminality by
    state or 2S 4udges! clers! attorneys! and6or bans! +ere any corrective measures undertaen3 B
    cc((
    !
    cc((i
    C
    2S De#artment of Justice 'ns#ector @eneral refused to res#ond on com#laint against senior officers
    of t,e 2S De#artment of Justice! 7>' %ssistant Director for )riminal 'nvestigations Lennet, Laiser
    and t,en 2S %ttorneys ;ffice Director Lennet, 5elson! relative to t,eir fraudulent res#onses on
    Senator Diane 7einstein! relative to refusal of t,e 2S De#artment of Justice to address mounting
    credible evidence of raceteering by )alifornia 4udges! attorneys! and baning e(ecutive3
    9,e 'ns#ector @eneral #ersisted in ,is refusal to tae action! even after inIuiry by )alifornia
    Senator Diane 7einstein3 B
    cc((ii
    C
    1eno+ned Aarvard Da+ Professor Darry 9raub! +,o in t,e early years of t,e ;bama administration
    assumed a s#ecial #osition in t,e 2S De#t of Justice! namely - Senior )ounsel! %ccess to Justice -
    refused to ans+er on a reIuest to restore 1ic,ard 7ineRs access to 4ustice and a reIuest to establis,
    by la+ t,e validation of case management and online #ublic access systems of t,e courts! +,ic,
    +ould affect substantial im#act on restoration of access to 4ustice and t,e 1ule of Da+ in t,e 2nited
    States3 B
    cc((iii
    C
    )om#laints! filed +it, t,e 2S %ttorneyEs ;ffices against clers! attorneys! and court staff! relative to
    t,eir conduct in t,e 2S courts! +ere never addressed3 B
    cc((iv
    !
    cc((v
    C
    'n t,e )entral District of )alifornia! +,ere #ublic corru#tion is ram#ant! t,e 2S %ttorney ;ffice
    ,ad #reviously closed t,e Public )orru#tion and )ivil 1ig,ts 2nit3 Ao+ever! on June 1-! -818!
    ne+s +as #ublis,ed t,at t,e Public )orru#tion and )ivil 1ig,ts 2nit ,ad been re-establis,ed by t,e
    ne+ly a##ointed %ndreE >irotte! Jr - 2S %ttorney! )entral District of )alifornia3 9,e ne+s re#ort
    cited a memo by t,e 2S %ttorney stating t,at &,e ,o#ed to ,ave t,e unit o#erational by July 13&
    7ollo+ing t,e ne+s! a series of com#laints on #ublic corru#tion and de#rivation of rig,ts +ere filed
    +it, t,e 2S %ttorneyEs ;ffice! )entral District of )alifornia3 'n no case +as recei#t of t,e
    com#laint acno+ledged! and in no case +as t,ere any indication t,at any action +as taen on t,e
    com#laints3 B
    cc((vi
    C
    9,e reIuest for im#eac,ment of t,e 2S %ttorney for t,e )entral District of )alifornia %ndre
    >irotte! Jr! #rovides a list :+it, lins to t,e original records) of com#laints! filed +it, ,is office!
    regarding corru#tion of t,e )alifornia courts! +,ic, ,e failed to address! or even acno+ledge
    recei#t of3 9,e failure of 2S %ttorney ;ffices to res#ond or initiate action in any suc, cases!
    documents t,at corru#tion of t,e courts! t,e legal #rofession! and financial institutions is today
    under #atronage of t,e 2S De#artment of Justice3 B
    cc((vii
    C
    1eIuest! filed +it, t,e 2S %ttorney @eneral! to address t,e large-scale fraud in P%).1 and
    )56.)7! +as never addressed3 B
    cc((viii
    C
    9,e cases! detailed above! of Borroer !ianne "ill! Borroer #illiam $arsley! and %erni& v
    Connor! S(C v BAC! document t,at 2S aut,orities +ere and are fully a+are of t,e tig,t lin
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    94/163 TOC:2
    bet+een corru#tion of t,e courts! t,e failure of baning regulation and t,e onset of t,e ongoing
    financial crisis in t,e 2S and beyond3 %nd yet! as often noted by 2S media and e(#erts! including
    .conomics =obel #ri"e +inner Paul Lrugman! Pulit"er Pri"e-+inner! senior business columnist
    @retc,en 5orgenson! acclaimed investigative 4ournalist 5att 9aibbi and many ot,ers! none of
    cul#rits among senior baning e(ecutives +as ever ,eld accountable3 B
    cc((i(
    !
    cc(((
    !
    cc(((i
    C
    %s a result! today bans in t,e 2S are #laced above t,e la+! &too big to 4ail&! and are #ermitted to
    engage in un#recedented fraud and abuse of consumers! s,are,olders! and t,e ta( #ayer3
    'n a +idely re#orted testimony before t,e 2S Senate! 2S %ttorney @eneral .ric Aolder in fact
    acno+ledged suc, #olicy 3 B
    cc(((ii
    C
    I a% ,on,erne$ &ha& &he size o' so%e o' &hese ins&i&+&ions .e,o%es so lar"e &ha& i& $oes .e,o%e
    $i''i,+l& 'or +s &o prose,+&e &he% /hen /e are hi& /i&h in$i,a&ions &ha& i' *o+ $o prose,+&e, i' *o+ $o
    .rin" a ,ri%inal ,har"e, i& /ill have a ne"a&ive i%pa,& on &he na&ional e,ono%*, perhaps even &he
    /orl$ e,ono%*.
    1egardless of later attem#ts by .ric Aolder to retract suc, testimony in later media a##earances! t,e
    evidence s,o+s t,at in fact suc, #olicy! +,ic, ,e advocated even #rior to becoming %ttorney
    @eneral! remains in effect3 B
    cc(((iii
    C
    'nstead! t,e 2S De#artment of Justice ,as re#eatedly entered &settlements& +it, large financial
    institutions! relative to +ides#read fraud in o#erations! +,ere suc, financial institutions #ay a fine
    to t,e 2S federal government! but no remedy is accorded to t,e actual victims of t,e fraud3 9,e
    latest settlement in t,is manner +as for T1635 billions +it, >an of %merica )or#oration3 B
    cc(((iv
    C
    'n re#orting t,e latest &settlement&! 1euters re#ortsG
    The ne"o&ia&ions have .een $riven .* an inves&i"a&ion in&o se,+ri&ies sol$ .* @errill F*n,h, /hi,h &he
    .ank a"ree$ &o a,0+ire in 600I a& &he hei"h& o' &he 'inan,ial ,risis, people 'a%iliar /i&h &he %a&&er
    have sai$.
    Ao+ever! one must recall t,at t,e merger of >an of %merica and 5errill Dync, +as com#elled on
    >an of %merica by senior 2S officers! t,roug, +,at +as described by analysts as a &criminal
    cons#iracy&! involving among ot,ers t,en 7ederal 1eserve >en >ernane3 B
    cc(((v
    C 't must be
    assumed t,at as #art of suc, &merger&! +,ic, defied any business sense! >an of %merica
    e(ecutives +ere #romised some ind of immunity for criminality in 5errill Dync,3 ;ne must
    assume t,at same! relative to t,e earlier &merger& of >an of %merica and )ountry+ide 7inancial
    )or#oration3
    )onditions in t,e 2S today in t,is regard are similar to conditions t,at #revailed in t,e 2S over a
    century ago! during t,e &1obber >aron Period& :see section %>))3 B
    cc(((vi
    C
    9,e failure of t,e 2S government to address corru#tion of t,e courts! baning regulation and t,e
    bans mae it unliely t,at t,e t,e 2S +ill soon see recovery from t,e current socio-economic
    crisis3
    2nder suc, conditions! t,e 2S and ot,er nations are more liely to face a #rolonged economic
    De#ression3
    %! "an/ing Regulation
    =o baning regulation agency in t,e 2nited States today duly #erforms its duties in revie+ing
    com#laints of fraud by financial institutions against t,e #eo#le of t,e 2nited States3
    S.) ),air! 5ary Sc,a#iro! for e(am#le! refused to res#ond on a reIuest to #erform ,er duties!
    relative to com#laints of fraud by senior officers of >an of %merica )or#oration and )ounty+ide
    7inancial )or#oration3 B
    cc(((vii
    C
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    95/163 TOC:2
    9,e )om#troller of )urrency! ;ffice of 9,rift Su#ervision! ;ffice of 9rade )ommission +ere no
    different in t,is regard3 9,ey all refuse to #erform t,eir duties! even after inIuiries by t,e 2S
    )ongress3 B
    cc(((viii
    C
    9,erefore! t,roug, suc, unla+ful conduct of senior 2S officers! baning e(ecutives +ere #lace
    above t,e la+3
    0! ,S Congress
    1eIuest! filed +it, t,e Senate Judiciary )ommittee and to t,e 2S Aouse of 1e#resentatives to
    initiate revie+ of evidence of large-scale fraud in t,e '9 systems of t,e us courts! +as ignored3
    B
    cc(((i(
    !
    cc(l
    C
    Die+ise! reIuest! filed +it, Senator Dea,y! ),air of t,e Senate Judiciary )ommittee to initiate
    revie+ of evidence of large-scale fraud in t,e '9 systems of t,e us courts! +as never addressed3
    B
    cc(li
    C 9,e case is note+ort,y! since t,e same Senator Dea,y did not ,esitate to call for t,e
    institution of a 9rut, and 1econciliation )ommission! relative to t,e corru#tion of t,e 2S
    De#artment of Justice3 B
    cc(lii
    C Suc, call by Senator Dea,y! a senior and res#ected senator is
    #er#le(ing3 Hit, it! Senator Dea,yEs un#recedented statement documents t,at t,e 2S )ongress is
    fully a+are of t,e corru#tion of t,e 2S 4ustice system today3 ;n t,e ot,er ,and! 9rut, and
    1econciliation )ommissions are ty#ically instituted in nations! +,o emerged from under tyrannical
    regimes3 9,erefore! Senator Dea,yEs call s,ould be considered an admission of t,e tyrannical nature
    of t,e 2S regime today! +,ere t,e 2S 4ustice system is ,olding #o+ers t,at are outside its aut,ority3
    Ao+ever! since t,ere +as no c,ange in t,e 2S #olitical system #rior to t,e time of Senator Dea,yEs
    call! it is unclear ,o+ ,e #erceived suc, 9rut, and 1econciliation )ommission could o#erate under
    t,e current 2S regime3
    1eIuests for 'm#eac,ments! documenting corru#tion of 2S t,e 2S courts! including Judge Jed
    1aoff! +,o +as and is central to t,e failure of 2S baning regulation! t,roug, fraud in litigation of
    financial institutions +ere never addressed3 B
    cc(liii
    !
    cc(liv
    !
    cc(lv
    !
    cc(lvi
    !
    cc(lvii
    !
    cc(lviii
    !
    cc(li(
    C
    'n fact! regardless of am#le evidence of ram#ant corru#tion of t,e 2S 4udges! im#eac,ment by t,e
    2S )ongress of 4udges! t,roug,out t,e ,istory of t,e 2nited States! is e(tremely rare3 't s,ould be
    seen as failure of t,e 2S )ongress to #erform its duties3
    5alaise of t,e 2S )ongress s,ould be deemed in,erent to current conditions in t,e 2nited States3
    1! The 2u&iciar
    'n no case! +,ere a court +as noticed of t,e simulated nature of t,e #roceedings and t,e records! u#
    to t,e Su#reme )ourt of t,e 2nited States! did a court cease suc, conduct! or correct its false
    electronic #ublic records3
    7or e(am#leG
    'n Log Ca+in *epu+licans v USA et al in t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! :see )-c)! 5otion
    to 'ntervene +as filed! documenting t,at t,e a##eal! t,en before t,e )ourt! +as taen from a
    simulated 4udgment records in t,e 2S District )ourt! )enteral District of )alifornia :see section
    )-c)3 9,e 5otion ased t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals to dismiss t,e a##eal for lac of 4urisdiction3
    B
    ccl
    C 9,e 5otion +as denied3
    'n Fine v Sheriff :8*-716*-) in t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! t,e June 38! -88* ;rder!
    issued by ),ief Judge %le( Lo"insi toget,er +it, )ircuit Judges Pae" and 9allman on 7ineEs
    Aabeas )or#us #etition! s,ould be deemed as 7raud on t,e )ourt! and effectively #roviding t,e
    #atronage of t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! to raceteering by )alifornia 4udge :see also
    section )3a)3 B
    ccli
    C
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    96/163 TOC:2
    Die+ise! in Fine v Sheriff :8*-%$-7) in t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt :see section )3a)! 5otion to
    'ntervene +as filed! +,ic, documented t,e systemic fraud in t,e records! related to t,e false
    im#risonment of former 2S #rosecutor 1ic,ard 7ine in t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! in t,e
    Dos %ngeles S,eriffEs De#artment! in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! in t,e
    t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! and in t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt itself3 B
    cclii
    C 9,e #a#ers +ere
    unla+fully &returned& by )ourt )ounsel Danny >icell! acting +it, no aut,ority at all3 B
    ccliii
    C
    'n "umins&i v Corsones :1G**-cv-88168) at t,e 2S District )ourt! Kermont! t,e )ourt ignored
    Dr FerniEs .( Parte %##lication for Deave to 7ile and 1eIuest not to serve s,am court orders on
    Pro Se Plaintiff Auminsi B
    ccliv
    C
    9,e most com#re,ensive communications in t,is regard +ere conducted +it, t,e 2S District )ourt!
    )entral District of )alifornia! and t,e outcome +as ,ars, retaliation against t,e aut,or of instant
    submission3 Dr Ferni #resented to t,e ),ief Judge and )ler of t,e )ourt of t,e 2S District )ourt!
    )entral District of )alifornia! credible evidence of t,e #ractice of simulated litigation in a number
    of cases in t,at )ourt! #ertaining to de#rivation of Diberty! )ivil )onstitutional and Auman 1ig,ts!
    and fraud by financial institutions :see section @-a)3 =o corrective actions +ere ever taen3
    9,e 7ederal ;ffice of %dministration of t,e )ourts refused to res#ond on t,is matter3 B
    cclv
    C
    5oreover! t,e evidence s,o+s t,at t,e 2S courts ,ave effectively establis,ed a #olicy of denying
    t,e rig,t to file records in court! +,ic, document state or federal 4udicial corru#tion :see section
    $3c)3
    't s,ould be concluded t,at t,e 2S courts are not ready! +illing! able to address t,eir o+n
    corru#tion3
    3! The legal $rofession
    2nder conditions! +,ic, +ere created t,roug, t,e im#lementation of P%).1 and )56.)7!
    attorneys routinely a##ear as counsel! +,ile not aut,ori"ed as )ounsel of 1ecord :see section )1,)3
    5oreover! as documented in cases involving financial institutions! t,ey at times a##ear +it, &no
    communication +it, client clause&3 B
    cclvi
    C
    Suc, a##earance by attorneys in t,e 2S courts s,ould be deemed 7raud u#on t,e )ourt3
    'n cases involving bans! #articularly under t,e current financial crisis! attorneys routinely file
    fraudulent baning records3 B
    cclvii
    C
    't is im#ossible t,at ca#able and com#etent attorneys! +,o a##ear before t,e 2S courts! fail to
    recogni"e t,e fundamental fraud in suc, systems3 %nd yet! no records +ere found of #rotest by t,e
    2S >ar %ssociation3
    ;f #articular concern must be t,e e(am#les of litigation! +,ere 2S agencies +ere #arty to t,e
    litigationG
    'n t,e case of S.) v >an of %merica )or#oration :)-b)! a 2S agency +as t,e #laintiff3 %nd
    t,e failure to issue and serve a valid summons in t,is case! demonstrates t,at from t,e start t,e
    S.) and its counsel +ere set to conduct simulated litigation in t,is landmar baning regulation
    case3
    'n t,e case of Dog )abin 1e#ublicans v 2S% et al :)-c!d) t,e 2S +as Defendant in t,e 2S
    District )ourt! and a##ellant in t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals3 'n bot, courts! 2S counsel +illingly
    #artici#ated in simulated litigation in landmar cases3
    1eIuest! filed +it, %merican >ar %ssociation! to revie+ evidence of large-scale fraud in t,e 2S
    courts! +as never addressed3 B
    cclviii
    C
    Hides#read corru#tion of t,e legal #rofession s,ould be deemed in,erent to conditions! currently
    #revailing in t,e 2S courts3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    97/163 TOC:2
    4! Ex$erts
    1eIuest for revie+ of t,e evidence of fraud in t,e com#uteri"ed records of t,e 2S district courts
    and courts of a##eals :$AC(* and C'/(CF) +as #reviously to Aarvard Da+ Professor ?oc,ai
    >enler! an e(#ert on com#uters and t,e la+3 B
    ccli(
    C =o res#onse +as received3
    =o com#uter science or legal e(#ert in t,e 2ntied States +as +illing to o#ine on t,e findings of
    studies! or revie+ academic #a#ers! +,ic, documented t,e findings of instant submission3
    =o la+ dean in t,e 2nited States! +,ic, ,as been ased! agreed to o#ine on t,e evidence of fraud in
    t,e 2S courts3 7or e(am#le! 5art,a 5ino+! Aarvard Da+ Dean! +,o lists ,er s#ecialty as Auman
    1ig,ts! +as ased to o#ine on integrity! or lac t,ereof! in '9 systems of t,e 2S district and a##eals
    courts - P%).1 and )56.)73 'n res#onse Dean 5ino+ saidG B
    ccl(
    C
    I re"re& &ha& as $ean &his is no& so%e&hin" &ha& I ,an +n$er&ake. Bes& /ishes, @arha @ino/, Dean
    an$ Jere%iah )%i&h, Jr Pro'essor o' Fa/.
    ?ale Da+ Sc,ool faculty +ere solicited for o#inion! but none res#onded3 B
    ccl(i
    C
    Si( :6) to# academic la+ 4ournals! +,ic, s#eciali"e in Auman 1ig,ts or com#uters and la+! refused
    to acce#t for revie+ academic #a#ers! dealing +it, t,e issues! detailed in instant submission3
    Aarvard Da+ Sc,ool Dean 5art,a 5ino+! Professors Dani @uinier! 1andal Lennedy! and Debora,
    1amire" N members of t,e >oard of %dvisors of Aarvard )ivil 1ig,ts )ivil Diberties Da+ 1evie+ -
    refused to res#ond on re#eat reIuest t,at t,e 4ournal acno+ledge recei#t of a #a#er! aut,ored by
    Jose#, Ferni! P,D! submitted to t,e 4ournal! titledG )ase 5anagement and ;nline Public %ccess
    Systems of t,e )ourts N %n 2rgent )all of Degislative %ction3 B
    ccl(ii
    C Previous reIuests for
    acno+ledgment of recei#t by t,e 4ournal itself lie+ise remained unans+ered3 B
    ccl(iii
    C
    Die+ise! in international conferences! +,ere 2S sc,olars +ere in administrative ey #ositions!
    suc, #a#ers +ere e(cluded! even after #assing #eer-revie+3 B
    ccl(iv
    C
    'n contrast! international 4ournals and academic conferences in com#uter-science :data mining) and
    criminology #ublis,ed and #resented t,e researc,! #ursuant to anonymous #eer-revie+3 BC
    't is liely t,at e(#erts in t,e 2S +ere un+illing to tae t,e riss! associated +it, +,istle-blo+ing
    of any ind in t,e 2nited States today :see section %s-)3 Ao+ever! it is unliely t,at ste#s +ould
    ,ave been taen against +orld-reno+ned academicians in t,e fields of la+ and com#uters3
    9,erefore! current conditions in t,e 2S s,ould also be deemed reflection of malaise of t,e 2S
    intelligentsia3
    5! Civil societ organi)ations
    =o national )ivil Society organi"ation! +,ic, +as a##roac,ed! is ready! +illing! able to address
    corru#tion of 4udges and attorneys3 't is believed to be in #art due to t,e fact t,at in many suc,
    organi"ations attorneys are involved in #olicy decisions! and are #articularly concerned regarding
    #rofessional retaliation3
    6! 7e&ia
    2S mainstream media s,ould be considered com#licit +it, corru#tion of t,e 2S courts3
    Some of t,e cases! outlined in instant submission! +ere cases t,at generated national and
    international interest! and +ere re#eatedly covered by mainstream media! for e(am#leG Citi,ens
    United v F(C :)3o!#)! Log Ca+in *epu+licans v USA et al :see section )3m!n )! S(C v BAC :see
    section )3,)! N'L v *epu+lic of Argentina :see section )3)3 9,e invalidity of t,e docets in t,ese
    cases is so blatant! t,at t,ere is no +ay t,at e(#erienced 4ournalists! s#eciali"ing in re#orting on
    legal manner! could avoid noticing t,at fact3 %nd yet! no+,ere are suc, re#orts to be found3 Horse
    yet! in t,e case of 7ine v S,eriff :see section )3a)! t,e Dos %ngeles 9imes re#eatedly re#orted in a
    manner t,at #ortrayed t,en falsely im#risoned 1ic,ard 7ine as some ind of a lunatic3 B
    ccl(v
    C
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    98/163 TOC:2
    9,ere is gro+ing evidence of su##ression of t,e #osting of evidence of 4udicial corru#tion in t,e 2S
    also on various +eb sites online3 9,is aut,orEs Scribd3com arc,ive is often mani#ulated3 &1eads&
    counts! +,ic, totaled over 134 million only recently! +ere ine(#licably reduced to only over
    188!8883 .ven on +eb sites t,at are su##osed to be &leaing sites&! suc, as Divelea3com t,ere is
    evidence of &;nline )ontent 5anagement& to reduce t,e visibility and readers,i# of #osting on t,e
    4udiciary3
    E! Com$liance 8ith relevant ,S la8
    #! Habeas Cor$us
    /igure @00 Fe'&8 #ri& o' =a.eas -orp+s, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, 9as&ern Dis&ri,& o' Penns*lvania U0S0 e20 rel0 -ohn
    Wheeler v0 Passmore Williamson 2J+l* 1A, 1I774 <i"h&8 #ri& o' =a.eas -orp+s A$ Tes&i'i,an$+%, () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, US v Rivera and Sanche. 2@a* 1A, 1A614. 9x&ensive sear,h in &he
    PA-9< re,or$s o' vario+s () $is&ri,& ,o+r&s 'aile$ &o $is,over a sin"le #ri& o' =a.eas -orp+s, iss+e$ a'&er
    &he i%ple%en&a&ion o' PA-9< an$ -@39->. )in,e &he #ri& o' =a.eas -orp+s is in 'a,& &he s+%%ons in
    s+,h li&i"a&ion, all ,ases o' =a.eas -orp+s in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es &o$a* sho+l$ .e $ee%e$ invali$, si%+la&e$
    li&i"a&ion. There'ore, &he privile"e o' =a.eas -orp+s sho+l$ .e $ee%e$ s+spen$e$, no onl* in &he
    B+an&ana%o Ba* $e&en&ion ,en&er an$ o&her K.la,k holeK prisons, opera&e$ .* &he () "overn%en& in vario+s
    lo,a&ions aro+n$ &he /orl$, .+& also in &he &erri&orial (ni&e$ )&a&es.
    9,e 2S )onstitution! Section *G Limits on Congress! saysG
    The Privile"e o' &he #ri& o' =a.eas -orp+s shall no& .e s+spen$e$, +nless /hen in -ases o'
    <e.ellion or Invasion &he p+.li, )a'e&* %a* re0+ire i&.
    9,e #rocedure! a##licable for Aabeas )or#us is initiated by a Petition for Hrit of Aabeas )or#us3
    9,e +rit in t,is case is a summons +it, t,e force of a court orderM it is addressed to t,e custodian :a
    #rison official for e(am#le) and demands t,at a #risoner be taen before t,e court! and t,at t,e
    custodian #resent #roof of aut,ority! allo+ing t,e court to determine +,et,er t,e custodian ,as
    la+ful aut,ority to detain t,e #risoner3
    Douis >randeis :2S Su#reme )ourt Justice 1*16 to 1*3*) referred to it as Et,e greatest ac,ievement
    of t,e .nglis,-s#eaing courts - establis,ing Diberty by la+E3
    Hilliam >rennan Jr :2S Su#reme )ourt Justice 1*56 to 1**8) routinely referred to it as &9,e @reat
    Hrit&! and t,e &)ornerstone of t,e 2nited States )onstitution&3
    %nd in Fay v Noia :1*63) Justice >rennan +roteG
    The .asi, prin,iple o' &he Brea& #ri& o' ha.eas ,orp+s is &ha&, in a ,ivilize$ so,ie&*, "overn%en& %+s&
    al/a*s .e a,,o+n&a.le &o &he j+$i,iar* 'or a %anLs i%prison%en&8 i' &he i%prison%en& ,anno& .e
    sho/n &o ,on'or% /i&h &he '+n$a%en&al re0+ire%en&s o' la/, &he in$ivi$+al is en&i&le$ &o his
    i%%e$ia&e release.
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    99/163 TOC:2
    9,e 2P1 1e#ort on t,e 2nited States :-818) recommended t,at t,e 2S restore t,e rig,t for Aabeas
    )or#us3 Ao+ever! t,at re#ort +as #rimarily based on conditions in t,e @uantanamo >ay detention
    center and ot,er &blac ,ole& #risons! o#erated by t,e government of t,e 2nited States in various
    locations around t,e +orld3
    'nstant submission! and in #articular t,e cases of 7ine and Sieverding! :see sections 3-a!b)
    demonstrate t,at Aabeas )or#us +as and is in fact sus#ended also in t,e territorial 2nited States3
    >eyond t,e section! referenced above! #ertaining to t,e invalidity of t,e P%).1 and )56.)7
    records in *ichard Fine v Sheriff of Los Angeles County :-G8*-cv-81*14) in t,e 2S District )ourt!
    )entral District of )alifornia! one s,ould noteG
    i3 =o Hrit of Aabeas )or#us +as ever issued by t,e )ourt! follo+ing t,e filing of t,e Petition3
    9,erefore! t,ere +as no summons in t,is case - invalid litigation +it, no 4urisdiction by t,e
    )ourt3
    ii3 S,eriff +as rig,tly named by 7ine as 1es#ondent! since ,e +as ,olding 1ic,ard 7ine3
    iii3 S,eriff refused to res#ond! and never res#onded on t,e Aabeas )or#us #etition of 7ine3
    iv3 2S 5agistrate )arla Hoe,rle decided to #ermit Judge David ?affe of t,e Dos %ngeles Su#erior
    )ourt to a##ear as 1es#ondent instead3 Suc, decision! to c,ange t,e named 1es#onder in
    litigation! +as made +it, no aut,ority at all3
    v3 2S 5agistrate )arla Hoe,rle +as never duly assigned to t,e case3 9,erefore! s,e ,ad no
    aut,ority to ad4udicate in t,e first #lace3 B
    ccl(vi
    C
    v3 Levin 5c)ormic a##eared on be,alf of Judge ?affe and t,e Dos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt +it,
    no aut,ority at all - ,e +as never a##ointed )ounsel of 1ecord for suc, #arties3
    vi3 =o declaration by Judge ?affe or any ot,er res#onding #arty can be found in t,e Aabeas )or#us
    #a#ers3 Levin 5c)ormic filed res#onse #a#ers +it, declaration by counsel alone - invalid
    #leading3
    vii3 =o signature +,atsoever by Judge ?affe or any ot,er res#onding #arty can be found in t,e
    Aabeas )or#us #a#ers filed by %ttorney 5c)ormic3
    viii3 =o docet! no +arrant! and no valid 4udgment from t,e underlying case :5arina v D% )ounty)
    in t,e Dos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt +ere ever filed! to s,o+ t,at t,e im#risonment &conformBedC
    +it, t,e fundamental reIuirements of la+&3
    1egardless of t,e fact t,at all 4udicial record in t,is case s,ould be deemed void! not voidable! one
    s,ould #articularly note t,at in ,er June 1-! -88* 1e#ort and 1ecommendation :later ado#ted by 2S
    Judge Jo,n Halter in ,is Judgment! denying t,e Petition)! 2S 5agistrate )arla Hoe,rle saysG B
    ccl(vii
    C
    %%0 S)AN?AR? O/ R,D%,1
    <evie/ o' &he Pe&i&ion in &his ,ase is "overne$ .* provisions o' &he An&i&erroris% an$ 9''e,&ive Dea&h
    Penal&* A,& o' 1AA? 2:A9DPA;4 0 (n$er A9DPA, a 'e$eral ,o+r& %a* no& "ran& ha.eas relie' on a ,lai%
    a$j+$i,a&e$ on i&s %eri&s in s&a&e ,o+r& +nless &he a$j+$i,a&ion:res+l&e$ in a $e,ision &ha& /as ,on&rar*
    &o, or involve$ an +nreasona.le appli,a&ion o', ,learl* es&a.lishe$ >e$eral la/, as $e&er%ine$ .* &he
    )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es,; or :res+l&e$ in a $e,ision &ha& /as .ase$ on an +nreasona.le
    $e&er%ina&ion o' &he 'a,&s in li"h& o' &he evi$en,e presen&e$ in &he )&a&e ,o+r& pro,ee$in".; 6I (.).-. J
    66742$4.
    =eedless to say! t,e im#risonment of 1ic,ard 7ine +it, no la+ful records! conforming +it, t,e
    fundamental reIuirements of t,e la+! +as unreasonable a##lication of clearly establis,ed 7ederal
    la+3 >ut t,e records of Fine v Sheriff in t,e 2S District )ourt! as a +,ole! and t,e reasoning in t,e
    1e#ort and 1ecommendation in #articular! demonstrate t,at t,e #rivilege of Aabeas )or#us +as in
    fact sus#ended! under t,e rubric of %ntiterrorism333
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    100/163 TOC:2
    %! .irst Amen&ment to the ,S Constitution( the right to file $a$ers in court
    /igure @10 () J+$"e <i,har$ Feon, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Dis&ri,& o' -ol+%.ia, ro+&inel* $enies &he ri"h& &o 'ile
    papers &ha& provi$e evi$en,e o' j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion.
    /igure @20 >ive 274 papers /i&h KFeave &o >ile Denie$, <JFK in Windsor v )vans et al. in &he () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&, D-. In ,ases seekin" pro&e,&ion a"ains& j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion, &he -lerk o' &he -o+r& 'aile$ &o $o,ke&
    papers, /hi,h provi$e$ evi$en,e o' j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion, in $isre"ar$ o' >irs& A%en$%en& ri"h&s an$ &he $+&ies
    an$ o.li"a&ions o' &he -lerk o' &he -o+r&. Ins&ea$, s+,h papers /ere $ire,&l* 'or/ar$e$ &o J+$"e <i,har$
    Feon, /ho han$ s,ri..le$ on &he% KFeave &o >ile Denie$K, an$ ha$ &he% re&+rne$ &o &he 'iler. #illia%
    #in$sor, a no&a.le an&i!j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion /his&le!.lo/er, re%ains &he &ar"e& o' re&alia&ion .* &he ,o+r&s &o
    &his $a&e. B
    ccl(viii
    C
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    101/163 TOC:2
    /igure @=0 Cine 2A4 papers /i&h KFeave &o >ile Denie$, <JFK in Zernik v "elson et al 2see also se,&ion -6"4.
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    102/163 TOC:2
    /igure @40 One o' a series o' papers, /hi,h /ere s&a%pe$ K<e,eive$ B+& Co& >ile$K an$ $enie$ 'ilin" +n$er
    perver&e$ KDis,repan,* Co&i,esK in Zernik v onnor et al in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o'
    -ali'ornia. D
    ,,lxix
    E The O''i,e o' &he -lerk rea$ ea,h 'ilin", an$ $enie$ &he ri"h& &o 'ile an* paper, /hi,h
    provi$e$ evi$en,e o' j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion, ei&her in &he )+perior -o+r& o' -ali'ornia, -o+n&* o' Fos An"eles, or
    in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r& i&sel'. >or ea,h s+,h paper, a perver&e$ KDis,repan,* Co&i,eK /as iss+e$, p+rpor&in"
    &o invoke a @a* 17, 600I ins&r+,&ion .* () @a"is&ra&e -arla #oehrle &o &he O''i,e o' &he -lerk. In &his 'i"+re
    ! &he 'ilin" /as $enie$ o' Opinion Fe&&er .* 'ra+$ exper& Ja%es #e$i,k, a hi"hl* $e,ora&e$ >BI ve&eran,
    re"ar$in" 'ra+$ in &he )+perior -o+r& o' -ali'ornia, -o+n&* o' Fos An"eles, in &he ,ase o' Samaan v Zernik0
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    103/163 TOC:2
    9,e 2nited States courts ,ave effectively establis,ed a #olicy e(cluding from t,e 7irst %mendment
    rig,t /to #etition t,e @overnment for a redress of grievances0 #a#ers! +,ic, documented 4udicial
    corru#tion3 5oreover! to accom#lis, suc, #olicy! t,e records s,o+ed 2S 4udges and court
    #ersonnel colluding in 7raud on t,e )ourt! and tig,t linage +as demonstrated bet+een suc,
    conduct! abuse of Auman 1ig,ts! and failing baning regulation in t,e 2nited States3
    9,erefore! in 5ay -88* #etition +as filed at t,e 2S District )ourt! Has,ington D) - %erni& v
    'elson et al :1G8*-cv-88$85) :see also section )-g)! under cause of action &9o )om#el 2S ;fficer
    to Perform Ais Duties&3 %mong Defendants +ere Lennet, Laiser :%ssistant Director of 7>' for
    )riminal 'nvestigations)! Lennet, 5elson :t,en Director of 2S %ttorneys ;ffice)! and Samuel
    >e"e :Senior )ounsel at S.))3 )onduct of Judge 1ic,ard Deon at t,e 2S District )ourt! District
    of )olumbia! +as by t,en #redictable N t,e 2S )ourt eliminated from t,e docet - +it, no Due
    Process67air Aearing - #a#ers! +,ic, +ere duly filed! and +,ic, #rovided evidence of 4udicial
    corru#tion at t,e Dos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt3
    %t t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! Judge Kirginia P,illi#s and 5agistrate )arla
    Hoe,rle ,ad #reviously engaged in -88$-* in similar conduct in %erni& v Connor et al :-G8$-cv-
    81558) :see also section )-f)! +,ere ten 4udges of t,e Dos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt! %ngelo 5o"ilo
    and Sandor Samuels +ere named among Defendants in com#laint under cause of action of
    De#rivation of 1ig,ts under t,e )olor of Da+3 9,e evidence #rovide in t,e case effectively
    documented raceteering at t,e Dos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt3 %t t,e commencement of t,e litigation
    at 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! t,e /Pro Se )ler0 refused to issue valid
    summons #resented to ,im3 Dater! #a#ers! +,ic, #rovided evidence of 4udicial corru#tion! +ere
    dis,onestly doceted N concealed under unrelated #a#er and doceting te(t in t,e online P%).1
    docet3
    H,en t,at #ractice +as #rotested! t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia initiated t,e
    #ractice of selectively refusing to file! and selectively issuing #erverted #retense /Discre#ancy
    =otices0 on certain #a#ers +it, no Due Process67air Aearing3 9,e staff of t,e ;ffice of t,e )ler
    also e(#licitly informed Plaintiff t,at 5agistrate )arla Hoe,rle instructed t,em to issue suc,
    /=otices0 on any #a#ers #ertaining to allegation of 4udicial corru#tion3 7urt,ermore! 5agistrate
    )arla Hoe,rle and Judge Kirginia P,illi#s of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia
    later issued a #retense /;rder0 - #ro,ibiting Plaintiff from access to t,e 2S )ourts in t,e matter3
    9,e records of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! also documented alleged
    Judicial 5isconduct and 7raud on t,e )ourt N relative to t,e issuance and doceting of invalid
    #retense )ourt records by 5agistrate )arla Hoe,rle and Judge Kirginia P,illi#s in collusion +it,
    unaut,ori"ed court #ersonnel3
    )onduct of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia +as t,erefore sub4ect of a Petition!
    +,ic, +as duly filed in June -88$ at t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit - %erni& v US!C2CAC
    :8$-7-714) N #ur#ortedly revie+ed by )ircuit Judges Ste#,en 1 1ein,ardt! 5ars,a S >er"on and
    5ilan D Smit,! Jr3 9,e Petition at t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! soug,t to )om#el Due
    Process 1ig,ts N issuing of valid summons and engaging in ,onest doceting at t,e 2S District
    )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia3 Ao+ever! #a#ers! +,ic, #rovided evidence of t,e denial of t,e
    rig,t to file #a#ers at t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! and alleged +ides#read
    corru#tion at t,e Dos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt! +ere eliminated from t,e docet of t,e 2S )ourt of
    %##eals! *t, )ircuit3 ;nly unsigned orders +ere issued by t,e )ircuit Judges! +,ic, +ere served
    and noticed +it, no aut,entication6certification by t,e )ler of t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t,
    )ircuit3
    Dater! in %#ril -818! similar conduct +as documented at t,e Su#reme )ourt of t,e 2nited States!
    under ca#tion of Fine v Sheriff :8*-%$-7)3 9,e %##lication! #ur#ortedly revie+ed by t,e
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    104/163 TOC:2
    )onference of t,e Su#reme )ourt! #ertained to t,e im#risonment in solitary confinement of former
    2S #rosecutor 1ic,ard 7ine! +it, no +arrant and no entry of Judgment6)onviction or Sentencing!
    after ,e ,ad e(#osed! #ublici"ed! and rebued t,e taing of /not #ermitted0 #ayments :/bribes0) by
    4udges of t,e Dos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt! +,ic, reIuired t,e enactment of /retroactive
    immunities0 :/#ardons0) for suc, 4udges3
    Pa#ers +ere duly filed as 5otion to 'ntervene B
    ccl((
    C in t,e Su#reme )ourt of t,e 2nited States under
    t,e ca#tion! referenced above! and +,ic, documented t,e #arallels in alleged corru#tion of t,e
    Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! of t,e )alifornia Judicial )ouncil! of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral
    District of )alifornia! and of t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! in t,e Aabeas )or#us Petition of
    1ic,ard 7ine and t,e cases #ertaining to Dr Ferni3
    9,e #a#ers +ere eliminated from t,e docet of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt by )ourt )ounsel Danny
    >icell! +,o acted +it, no aut,ority at all3 B
    ccl((i
    C
    0! .irst Amen&ment to the ,S Constitution( the right to access court recor&s to ins$ect an& to
    co$
    'n Ni4on v. #arner Communications) Inc. 435 23S3 5$* :1*7$)! t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt reaffirmed
    t,e common la+ rig,t to access 4udicial records to ins#ect and to co#yG
    I& is ,lear &ha& &he ,o+r&s o' &his ,o+n&r* re,o"nize a "eneral ri"h& &o inspe,& an$ ,op* p+.li, re,or$s
    an$ $o,+%en&, in,l+$in" j+$i,ial re,or$s an$ $o,+%en&s... A%eri,an $e,isions "enerall* $o no&
    ,on$i&ion en'or,e%en& o' &his ri"h& on a proprie&ar* in&eres& in &he $o,+%en& or +pon a nee$ 'or i& as
    evi$en,e in a la/s+i&. The in&eres& ne,essar* &o s+ppor& &he iss+an,e o' a /ri& ,o%pellin" a,,ess has
    .een 'o+n$, 'or exa%ple, in &he ,i&izenLs $esire &o keep a /a&,h'+l e*e on &he /orkin"s o' p+.li,
    a"en,ies... an$ in a ne/spaper p+.lisherLs in&en&ion &o p+.lish in'or%a&ion ,on,ernin" &he opera&ion o'
    "overn%en&...
    9,e Su#reme )ourt found t,is rig,t in,erent to t,e 7irst %mendment! to t,e 7ourt, and t,e Si(t,
    %mendments3
    9,e rig,t to access court records to ins#ect and to co#y is essential for maintaining #ublic
    trans#arency and integrity of t,e courts3
    1egardless! t,roug, t,e im#lementation of t,e '9 systems of t,e 2S courts! t,e #ublic is today
    denied access to court records! at times! even a #arty to records in o+n litigation :see section )1e!g)
    7or e(am#le! re#eat efforts +ere made to access t,e records in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral
    District of )alifornia in 7oseph %erni& v 7acBueline Connor et al :-G8$-cv-81558)! *ichard I Fine v
    Sheriff of Los Angeles County :-G8*-cv-81*14)! and US v City of Los Angeles et al :-G88-cv-1176*)
    :see sections @-a)3 B
    ccl((ii
    C
    Die+ise! Hilliam Hindsor +as denied access to ,is o+n case records in t,e 2S District )ourt!
    =ort,ern District of @eorgia :see section )-4)3
    1! Rules Enabling Act
    7rom Hii#edia &1ules .nabling %ct&G
    The <+les 9na.lin" A,& 2,h. ?71, P+..F. 73R417, 4I )&a&. 10?4, ena,&e$ J+ne 1A, 1A34, 6I (.).-. J
    60764 is an A,& o' -on"ress &ha& "ave &he j+$i,ial .ran,h &he po/er &o pro%+l"a&e &he >e$eral <+les o'
    -ivil Pro,e$+re. A%en$%en&s &o &he A,& allo/e$ 'or &he ,rea&ion o' &he >e$eral <+les o' -ri%inal
    Pro,e$+re an$ o&her pro,e$+ral ,o+r& r+les. The ,rea&ion an$ revision o' r+les p+rs+an& &o &he <+les
    9na.lin" A,& is +s+all* ,arrie$ o+& .* &he J+$i,ial -on'eren,e o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, &he poli,*%akin"
    .o$* o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es 'e$eral ,o+r&s.
    The ena,&%en& o' &he <+les 9na.lin" A,& on J+ne 1A, 1A34 /as a revol+&ionar* %o%en& in &he his&or*
    o' ,ivil pro,e$+re in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es. The la/ repeale$ &he ar,hai, K,on'or%i&* prin,ipleK /hi,h ha$
    "overne$ a,&ions a& la/ 2an$ onl* a,&ions a& la/4 in (.). 'e$eral ,o+r&s 'or over 140 *ears5 na%el*, &he
    r+le &ha& 'e$eral ,o+r&s sho+l$ ,on'or% &heir pro,e$+re in s+,h a,&ions &o &ha& o' &he ,o+r&s in &he s&a&e
    in /hi,h &he* /ere lo,a&e$. The ,on'or%i&* prin,iple ha$ ,a+se$ %ajor pro.le%s 'or 'e$eral ,o+r&s &ha&
    $i$ no& a,&+all* si& in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, s+,h as &he (ni&e$ )&a&es -o+r& 'or -hina.
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    105/163 TOC:2
    #hile &he ,o+r&s exer,ise$ r+le%akin" po/ers "ran&e$ &o &he% +n$er &he A,& /i&ho+& -on"ressional
    in&erven&ion 'or nearl* 'or&* *ears, -on"ress re'+se$ &o allo/ &he >e$eral <+les o' 9vi$en,e &o "o in&o
    e''e,& a'&er &heir approval .* &he )+pre%e -o+r& in 1A73. The <+les o' 9vi$en,e /ere even&+all*
    passe$, /i&h s+.s&an&ial ,han"es, as le"isla&ion .* -on"ress. Be,a+se o' -on"ressLs in&erven&ion in
    1A73 an$ s+.se0+en& *ears, &he r+le%akin" po/ers "ran&e$ &o &he j+$i,iar* .* &he A,& have .een
    re$+,e$.
    't is claimed t,at t,e evidence #rovided in instant submission documents t,at t,e develo#ment!
    im#lementation! and o#eration of t,e '9 systems of t,e 2S courts in fact violates t,e *ules
    (na+ling Act :see section )1a)
    Suc, system re#resent t,e sei"ing by t,e 2S 4udiciary of unla+ful aut,ority to adulterate t,e
    7ederal 1ules of )ivil Procedure and numerous ot,er la+s as +ell as )ivil and )onstitutional
    1ig,ts3
    5oreover! since t,e rules! embedded in suc, systems ,ave never been disclosed or #ublis,ed! suc,
    systems also violate t,e fundamental #rinci#le of Publicity of t,e Da+3
    3! .e&eral Rules of Civil 9roce&ure (&uties of the cler/
    9,e 7ederal 1ules of )ivil Procedure sayG
    <+le 4. )+%%ons
    2a4 -on&en&s5 A%en$%en&s.
    214 ontents0 A s+%%ons %+s&8
    ...
    2>4 .e si"ne$ .* &he ,lerk5 an$
    2B4 .ear &he ,o+r&Ms seal.
    %s documented in instant submission! t,e 2S courts today often fail to issue summonses t,at are
    signed by t,e cler and bear t,e courtEs seal3 5oreover! as s,o+n in %erni& v US !istrict Court)
    Southern !istrict of California! t,e )ler of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia
    refused to issue valid summonses :see also section @-a)3
    %nd +,en t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit +as #etitioned to mandate t,e 2S District )ourt to
    issue valid summonses! t,e #etition +as summarily denied3
    9,e 7ederal 1ules of )ivil Procedure sayG
    <+le 7. )ervin" an$ >ilin" Plea$in"s an$ O&her Papers
    ...
    2$4 >ilin".
    214 <e0+ire$ >ilin"s5 -er&i'i,a&e o' )ervi,e. An* paper a'&er &he ,o%plain& &ha& is re0+ire$ &o .e serve$
    V&o"e&her /i&h a ,er&i'i,a&e o' servi,eV%+s& .e 'ile$ /i&hin a reasona.le &i%e a'&er servi,e.
    %s s,o+n in instant submission! valid )ertificates of Service are no longer filed +it, t,e cler of
    t,e courts under P%).1 and )56.)73
    9,e 7ederal 1ules of )ivil Procedure sayG
    <+le 7I. 9n&erin" J+$"%en&
    ...
    2.4 9n&erin" J+$"%en&.
    214 #i&ho+& &he -o+r&Ms Dire,&ion. )+.je,& &o <+le 742.4 an$ +nless &he ,o+r& or$ers o&her/ise, &he
    ,lerk %+s&, /i&ho+& a/ai&in" &he ,o+r&Ms $ire,&ion, pro%p&l* prepare, si"n, an$ en&er &he j+$"%en& /hen8
    2A4 &he j+r* re&+rns a "eneral ver$i,&5
    2B4 &he ,o+r& a/ar$s onl* ,os&s or a s+% ,er&ain5 or
    2-4 &he ,o+r& $enies all relie'.
    %s s,o+n in instant submission! t,e cler of t,e court no longer signs and enters t,e Judgments of
    t,e 2S courts under P%).1 and )56.)73
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    106/163 TOC:2
    9,e 7ederal 1ules of )ivil Procedure sayG
    <+le 77. -on$+,&in" B+siness5 -lerkMs A+&hori&*5 Co&i,e o' an Or$er or J+$"%en&
    2a4 #hen -o+r& Is Open. 9ver* $is&ri,& ,o+r& is ,onsi$ere$ al/a*s open 'or 'ilin" an* paper, iss+in" an$
    re&+rnin" pro,ess, %akin" a %o&ion, or en&erin" an or$er.
    ...
    264 3rders0 )+.je,& &o &he ,o+r&Ms po/er &o s+spen$, al&er, or res,in$ &he ,lerkMs a,&ion 'or "oo$ ,a+se,
    &he ,lerk %a*8
    ...
    2$4 )ervin" Co&i,e o' an Or$er or J+$"%en&.
    214 Service0 I%%e$ia&el* a'&er en&erin" an or$er or j+$"%en&, &he ,lerk %+s& serve no&i,e o' &he en&r*,
    as provi$e$ in <+le 72.4, on ea,h par&* /ho is no& in $e'a+l& 'or 'ailin" &o appear. The ,lerk %+s& re,or$
    &he servi,e on &he $o,ke&.
    %s documented in instant submission! today t,e rig,t to file #a#ers is often denied! +,en #a#ers
    #rovide evidence of 4udicial corru#tion3 9,e cler of t,e court no longer send notice of an order or
    4udgment! and t,e clers fail to record t,e service in t,e docet3
    9,e 7ederal 1ules of )ivil Procedure sayG
    <+le 7A. <e,or$s Gep& .* &he -lerk
    2a4 -ivil Do,ke&.
    214 In Beneral. The ,lerk %+s& keep a re,or$ kno/n as &he :,ivil $o,ke&; in &he 'or% an$ %anner
    pres,ri.e$ .* &he Dire,&or o' &he A$%inis&ra&ive O''i,e o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es -o+r&s /i&h &he approval o'
    &he J+$i,ial -on'eren,e o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es. The ,lerk %+s& en&er ea,h ,ivil a,&ion in &he $o,ke&.
    A,&ions %+s& .e assi"ne$ ,onse,+&ive 'ile n+%.ers, /hi,h %+s& .e no&e$ in &he $o,ke& /here &he 'irs&
    en&r* o' &he a,&ion is %a$e.
    264 I&e%s &o .e 9n&ere$. The 'ollo/in" i&e%s %+s& .e %arke$ /i&h &he 'ile n+%.er an$ en&ere$
    ,hronolo"i,all* in &he $o,ke&8
    2A4 papers 'ile$ /i&h &he ,lerk5
    2B4 pro,ess iss+e$, an$ proo's o' servi,e or o&her re&+rns sho/in" exe,+&ion5 an$
    2-4 appearan,es, or$ers, ver$i,&s, an$ j+$"%en&s.
    %s documented in instant submission! t,e under P%).1 and )56.)7! t,e docets are no longer
    e#t by t,e clers of t,e courts or #ersons! aut,ori"ed by t,em3 5oreover! t,e clers often refuse to
    acce#t t,e filing and6or record in t,e docet #a#ers! +,ic, #rovide evidence of 4udicial corru#tion!
    as +ell as #rocess issued! and #roofs of service or ot,er returns s,o+ing e(ecution :e3g3!
    summonses)3
    4! Authentication an& certification of 2u&icial recor&s' legal $rocess un&er the signature of the
    cler/ an& the Seal of the Court
    9,e 2S )onstitution! %rticle 'K! J1! declaresG
    >+ll 'ai&h an$ ,re$i& shall .e "iven in ea,h s&a&e &o &he p+.li, a,&s, re,or$s an$ j+$i,ial pro,ee$in"s o'
    ever* o&her s&a&e. An$ ,on"ress %a* .* "eneral la/s pres,ri.e &he %anner in /hi,h s+,h a,&s,
    re,or$s an$ pro,ee$in"s shall .e prove$, an$ &he e''e,& &hereo'.
    9,e %ct of 5ay -6! 17*8! statesG
    Tha& &he a,& o' &he le"isla&+res o' &he several s&a&es shall .e a+&hen&i,a&e$ .* havi" &he seal o' &heir
    respe,&ive s&a&es a''ixe$ &here&o8 Tha& &he re,or$s an$ j+$i,ial pro,ee$in"s o' &he ,o+r&s o' an* s&a&e
    shall .e prove$ or a$%i&&e$, in an* o&her ,o+r& /i&hin &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, .* &he a&&es&a&ion o' &he ,lerk,
    an$ &he seal o' &he ,o+r& annexe$, i' &here .e a seal, &o"e&her /i&h a ,er&i'i,a&e o' &he j+$"e, ,hie'
    j+s&i,e or presi$in" %a"is&ra&e, as &he ,ase %a* .e, &ha& &he sai$ a&&es&a&ion is in $+e 'or%. An$ &he
    sai$ re,or$s an$ j+$i,ial pro,ee$in"s, a+&hen&i,a&e$ as a'oresai$, shall have s+,h 'ai&h an$ ,re$i&
    "iven &o &he%, in ever* ,o+r& /i&hin &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, as &he* have, .* la/ or +sa"e, in &he ,o+r&s o'
    &he s&a&e 'ro% /hen,e &he sai$ re,or$s are, or shall .e &aken.
    9,e %ct of 5arc, -7! 1$84! statesG
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    107/163 TOC:2
    Tha&, 'ro% an$ a'&er &he passa"e o' &his a,&, all re,or$s an$ exe%pli'i,a&ions o' o''i,e .ooks, /hi,h are
    or %a* .e kep& in an* p+.li, o''i,e o' an* s&a&e, no& apper&ainin" &o a ,o+r&, shall .e prove$ or a$%i&&e$
    in an* o&her ,o+r& or o''i,e in an* o&her s&a&e, .* &he a&&es&a&ion o' &he keeper o' &he sai$ re,or$s or
    .ooks, an$ &he seal o' his o''i,e &here&o annexe$, i' &here .e a seal, &o"e&her /i&h a ,er&i'i,a&e o' &he
    presi$in" j+s&i,e o' &he ,o+r& o' &he ,o+n&* or $is&ri,&, as &he ,ase %a* .e, in /hi,h s+,h o''i,e is or
    %a* .e kep& or o' &he "overnor, &he se,re&ar* o' s&a&e, &he ,han,ellor or &he keeper o' &he "rea& seal o'
    &he s&a&e, &ha& &he sai$ a&&es&a&ion is in $+e 'or%, an$ .* &he proper o''i,er an$ &he sai$ ,er&i'i,a&e, i'
    "iven .* &he presi$in" j+s&i,e o' a ,o+r&, shall .e '+r&her a+&hen&i,a&e$ .* &he ,lerk or pro&hono&ar* o'
    &he sai$ ,o+r&, /ho shall ,er&i'*,
    +n$er his han$ an$ &he seal o' his o''i,e, &ha& &he sai$ presi$in" j+s&i,e is $+l* ,o%%issione$ an$
    0+ali'ie$5 or i' &he sai$ ,er&i'i,a&e .e "iven .* &he5 "overnor, &he se,re&ar* o' s&a&e, &he ,han,ellor or
    keeper o' &he "rea& seal, i& shall .e +n$er &he "rea& seal o' &he s&a&e in /hi,h &he sai$ ,er&i'i,a&e is %a
    $e. An$ &he sai$ pro,ee$in"s o' &he sai$ ,o+r&.
    9,e 2S la+! -$ USC C :D0: 2 Seal and teste of process) saysG
    All /ri&s an$ pro,ess iss+in" 'ro% a ,o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es shall .e +n$er &he seal o' &he ,o+r& an$
    si"ne$ .* &he ,lerk &hereo'.
    =o order of t,e 2S courts is issued today under t,e seal of t,e court and under t,e signature :eit,er
    ,and-signature or electronic signature) of t,e cler of t,e court3
    %nd as s,o+n above! in numerous cases! also t,e summonses of t,e 2S courts are issued unsigned
    and +it, no seal of t,e court embossed on t,em3
    =eit,er is any 4udicial record aut,enticated t,roug, a )ertificate of Service bearing t,e signature of
    t,e cler of t,e court3
    5! Electronic Signatures in Global an& National Commerce Act (%AAA) an& E(Government Act
    (%AA%)
    7rom Hii#edia! E(lectronic Signatures in Glo+al and National Commerce ActEG
    The 9le,&roni, )i"na&+res in Blo.al an$ Ca&ional -o%%er,e A,& 29)IBC, P+..F. 10?R66A, 114 )&a&.
    4?4, ena,&e$ J+ne 30, 6000, 17 (.).-. ,h. A?4 is a (ni&e$ )&a&es 'e$eral la/ passe$ .* &he (.).
    -on"ress &o 'a,ili&a&e &he +se o' ele,&roni, re,or$s an$ ele,&roni, si"na&+res in in&ers&a&e an$ 'orei"n
    ,o%%er,e .* ens+rin" &he vali$i&* an$ le"al e''e,& o' ,on&ra,&s en&ere$ in&o ele,&roni,all*...
    Al&ho+"h ever* s&a&e has a& leas& one la/ per&ainin" &o ele,&roni, si"na&+res, i& is &he 'e$eral la/ &ha&
    la*s o+& &he "+i$elines 'or in&ers&a&e ,o%%er,e. The "eneral in&en& o' &he 9)IBC A,& is spelle$ o+& in
    &he ver* 'irs& se,&ion 2101.a4, &ha& a ,on&ra,& or si"na&+re :%a* no& .e $enie$ le"al e''e,&, vali$i&*, or
    en'or,ea.ili&* solel* .e,a+se i& is in ele,&roni, 'or%;. This si%ple s&a&e%en& provi$es &ha& ele,&roni,
    si"na&+res an$ re,or$s are j+s& as "oo$ as &heir paper e0+ivalen&s, an$ &here'ore s+.je,& &o &he sa%e
    le"al s,r+&in* o' a+&hen&i,i&* &ha& applies &o paper $o,+%en&s.
    9,e sti#ulations of t,e .-Sign %ct in t,emselves are inadeIuate! and to t,e degree t,at it a##lies to
    government records! suc, as records of t,e 2S courts! t,e %ct +as never #romulgated in a
    meaningful +ay3
    7rom Hii#edia! &(2Government Act 9<;;<=&G
    The 9!Bovern%en& A,& o' 6006 2P+..F. 107R347, 11? )&a&. 6IAA, 44 (.).-. J 101, =.<. 647I3). I034,
    is a (ni&e$ )&a&es s&a&+&e ena,&e$ on De,e%.er 17, 6006, /i&h an e''e,&ive $a&e 'or %os& provisions o'
    April 17, 6003. I&s s&a&e$ p+rpose is &o i%prove &he %ana"e%en& an$ pro%o&ion o' ele,&roni,
    "overn%en& servi,es an$ pro,esses .* es&a.lishin" a >e$eral -hie' In'or%a&ion O''i,er /i&hin &he
    O''i,e o' @ana"e%en& an$ B+$"e&, an$ .* es&a.lishin" a 'ra%e/ork o' %eas+res &ha& re0+ire +sin"
    In&erne&!.ase$ in'or%a&ion &e,hnolo"* &o i%prove ,i&izen a,,ess &o "overn%en& in'or%a&ion an$
    servi,es, an$ 'or o&her p+rposes.
    The s&a&+&e in,l+$es /i&hin i&8
    >I)@A 2&he >e$eral In'or%a&ion )e,+ri&* @ana"e%en& A,& o' 6006 as Ti&le III, an$
    -IP)9A 2&he -on'i$en&ial In'or%a&ion Pro&e,&ion an$ )&a&is&i,al 9''i,ien,* A,&4 as Ti&le N.
    %s #art of t,e transition to electronic administration of government! t,e 2S )ongress #assed t,e .-
    @overnment %ct :-88-) and t,e .-Sign %ct :-888)3 9,e 2S De#artment of Aomeland Security
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    108/163 TOC:2
    Presidential Directive-J :-884) furt,er establis,ed #olicies for validation and aut,entication of
    electronic systems and electronic records of t,e .(ecutive >ranc, agencies3 Standards +ere
    accordingly #romulgated and a##lications +ere im#lemented3 'n contrast! t,e records systems!
    im#lemented by t,e 2S courts! +ere not covered by suc, la+s and regulations3
    'n contrast! no suc, la+s and standards +ere a##lied to t,e electronic records of t,e 2S )ourts :see
    also section )1c)3 't is obvious t,at all t,e 2S courts 4udicial records today are electronic records3
    1egardless! t,ey bear no valid electronic signatures3 Die+ise! +,en suc, records are served on
    #arties as #a#er records! t,ey bear no valid ,and or electronic signatures3 %t times! t,e records bear
    scanned gra#,ic signatures of 2S 4udges3 Ao+ever! suc, signatures are neit,er valid ,and
    signatures! nor valid electronic signatures3
    9,e electronic records of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt bear no signatures at all3 %nd +,en Su#reme
    )ourt records +ere ins#ected! in t,e case of *ichard Fine v Sheriff Lee Baca! no ,and signatures
    +ere discovered in t,e #a#er file eit,er3 9,erefore! it remains unclear if any Su#reme )ourt 4udicial
    records are ever signed at all3
    .! Com$liance 8ith relevant treaties an& conventions
    2nder t,e current regime! t,e 2nited States s,ould be deemed in violation of and6or failing to fulfill
    its duties and obligations #ursuant to 'nternational Da+ and t,e follo+ing treaties and6or
    conventionsG
    #! "asel Accor&s on "an/ing Su$ervision
    7rom Hii#edia &>asel %ccords&G
    The Basel A,,or$s re'er &o &he .ankin" s+pervision A,,or$s 2re,o%%en$a&ions on .ankin"
    re"+la&ions4VBasel I, Basel II an$ Basel IIIViss+e$ .* &he Basel -o%%i&&ee on Bankin" )+pervision
    2B-B)4. The* are ,alle$ &he Basel A,,or$s as &he B-B) %ain&ains i&s se,re&aria& a& &he Bank 'or
    In&erna&ional )e&&le%en&s in Basel, )/i&zerlan$ an$ &he ,o%%i&&ee nor%all* %ee&s &here. The Basel
    A,,or$s is a se& o' re,o%%en$a&ions 'or re"+la&ions in &he .ankin" in$+s&r*.
    9,e 2S! a #arty to t,e >asel %ccords! B
    ccl((iii
    C s,ould be deemed failing to fulfill its duties and
    obligations #ursuant to t,e %ccordsG
    7ailing to maintain effective national >aning Su#ervision to ensure t,e conduct of 2S bans
    under &sound baning #rinci#les&3
    Decriminali"ing 5oney Daundering by 2S bans3 :see section D-)
    Decriminali"ing un#recedented fraud by 2S bans on consumers! s,are ,olders! and t,e 2S ta(
    #ayers3 :section D-)
    )olluding! t,roug, fraud in t,e 2S courts in un#recedented fraud on t,e #eo#le of t,e 2S and
    beyond! e3g3 t,e #eo#le of %rgentina3 :see sections )-d!e!f!g!,!)
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    109/163 TOC:2
    %! Hague A$ostille Treat (#;4#)
    /igure @20 )a%ple () Apos&ille 'or%, p+rs+an& &o &he Hague Apostille ?reaty 21A?14. Biven &he lar"e!s,ale
    'ra+$ in a+&hen&i,a&ion an$ ,er&i'i,a&ion o' () ,o+r&s j+$i,ial re,or$s, $o,+%en&e$ in ins&an& s+.%ission, i& is
    re,o%%en$e$ &ha& o&her na&ions, /hi,h are par&* &o &he Trea&*, no& re,o"nize Apos&illes, iss+e$ .* () a+!
    &hori&ies.
    9,e 9reaty abolis,ed t,e reIuirement of legali"ation for foreign #ublic documents- B
    ccl((iv
    C
    9,e 2nited States entered t,e )onvention into force on 15 ;ct 1*$13
    'nstant submission documents un#recedented fraud in t,e aut,entication and certification of 4udicial
    records in t,e 2S courts today3 :see section )1d)
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    110/163 TOC:2
    't recommended t,at ot,er nations! +,ic, are #arty to t,e 9reaty not recogni"e %#ostilles from t,e
    2nited States courts3
    0! ,nite& Nations Convention against Transnational Organi)e& Crime
    9,e 2nited =ations )onvention against 9ransnational ;rgani"ed )rime :2=9;)) is a -888 2nited
    =ations-s#onsored multilateral treaty against transnational organi"ed crime3 9,e )onvention +as
    ado#ted by a resolution of t,e 2nited =ations @eneral %ssembly on 15 =ovember -8883 %s of
    %ugust -814! t,e )onvention ,as been ratified by 1$8 states3 't is also called t,e Palermo
    )onvention! and its t,ree #rotocols :t,e Palermo Protocols) areG B
    ccl((v
    C
    Protocol to Prevent! Su##ress and Punis, 9rafficing in Persons! es#ecially Homen and
    ),ildrenM
    Protocol against t,e Smuggling of 5igrants by Dand! Sea and %ir! and
    Protocol against t,e 'llicit 5anufacturing and 9rafficing in 7irearms
    %ll four of t,ese instruments contain elements of t,e current international la+ on ,uman trafficing!
    arms trafficing and money laundering3 9,e 2nited =ations ;ffice on Drugs and )rime :2=;D))
    acts as custodian of t,e 2=9;) and its #rotocols3
    9,e )onvention came into force on -* Se#tember -8833 B
    ccl((vi
    C
    9,e 2 signed t,e )onvention on 13 Dec -888 and ratified it on 3 =ov -8853
    9,e 2S s,ould be deemed in violation of t,e )onvention on t,e follo+ing groundsG
    a3 Decriminali"ation of 9rafficing in Persons - under t,e &.(traordinary 1endition& #ractices! +,ic, are
    #ur#ortedly a##roved by t,e 2S courts3
    b3 Decriminali"ation of 5oney Daundering - as seen in t,e case of AS>) and ot,er 2S bans3 :see Section
    D-)
    c3 Decriminali"ation of 5oney Daundering - as seen in t,e case of N'L Capital v *epu+lic of Argentina :see
    section )-)
    G! Retaliation against anti(2u&icial corru$tion activists
    #! General
    /igure @@0 An&i!j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion a,&ivis&, .lo""er <o"er )h+ler, a'&er .ein" .ea&en an$ 'alsel* i%prisone$
    in Ala.a%a. A-F(, -o%%i&&ee &o Pro&e,& Jo+rnalis&s, an$ la/ pro'essors a&&e%p& &o assis& )h+ler. The le"al
    re,or$s, in,l+$in" &he /arran&, p+rpor&e$l* provi$in" &he le"al 'o+n$a&ion 'or his arres& an$ i%prison%en&,
    /ere seale$ .* &he ,o+r&. The ,ase /as $es,ri.e$ as Kprior res&rain& o' >ree )pee,hK, /hi,h is
    ,ons&i&+&ionall* prohi.i&e$. I& is %os& likel* a ,ase o' 'alse arres& an$ 'alse i%prison%en&, /i&h no vali$ j+$i,ial
    re,or$s. D
    ,,lxxvii
    ,
    ,,lxxviii
    ,
    ,,lxxix
    ,
    ,,lxxx
    ,
    ,,lxxxi
    E
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    111/163 TOC:2
    /igure @A0 An&i!j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion a,&ivis&, 'or%er () prose,+&or <i,har$ >ine, $+rin"
    his 600A!10 'alse i%prison%en& in soli&ar* ,on'ine%en& in Fos An"eles 2see also se,&ions -6a4.
    /igure @B0 Davi$ ),hie$, an&i!j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion a,&ivis&, /as jaile$ 'or 30 $a*s 'or silen&l* o.servin" &he
    ,o+r&. D
    ,,lxxxii
    E
    %! Retaliation against +r -ose$h <erni/ ( author of instant submission
    /igure @90 Dr Joseph Zernik, a+&hor o' ins&an& s+.%ission, shor&l* .e'ore es,apin" Fos
    An"eles an$ &he (ni&e$ )&a&es in April 6010. As a res+l& o' his e''or&s &o $is,over, ar,hive, an$ $isse%ina&e
    re,or$s, per&ainin" &o j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion, in ,onj+n,&ion /i&h &he 'irs& ever (P< o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, he /as
    so+"h& .* () @arshals KThrea& (ni&K, an$ a&&e%p& /as %a$e &o apprehen$ hi%. A'&er es,apin" &o Israel,
    re&alia&ion .* &he () an$ Israeli "overn%en&s ,on&in+e$. In 6013, as a res+l& o' re&alia&or* a,&ions,
    ,oin,i$en&al /i&h &he p+.li,a&ion o' &he (C (P< repor& on Israel, &o /hi,h he ,on&ri.+&e$ a s+.%ission, Dr
    Zernik re0+es&e$ &/i,e &he pro&e,&ion o' &he >e$eral Ber%an "overn%en&. 2see also se,&ions -1$. -6'4
    9,e com#re,ensive studies of t,e '9 systems of various courts! +,ic, are in #art included in instant
    submission! and in #art +ere #ublis,ed in academic 4ournals! sub4ect to international anonymous
    #eer revie+! are t,e outcome of my intense interest in t,is area! as a ey to Auman 1ig,ts in our
    time3 Ao+ever! ' came to t,is area +it, no formal training in eit,er com#uter science or t,e la+3
    5y acIuaintance +it, t,e legal system and '9 systems of t,e courts +ere all t,e outcome of my
    e(#erience in t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! )ounty of Dos %ngeles! +,ic, started around -8873
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    112/163 TOC:2
    'n =ovember -887! ' +as forced to leave ,is ,ome and my #ro#erty under t,e t,reat of force!
    unla+ful by credible! by t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! )ounty of Dos %ngeles3 5y #ro#erty +as
    forcibly entered by %ttorney David Pasterna! former President of t,e Dos %ngeles >ar %ssociation!
    +,o #ur#orted to tae #ossession of it on be,alf and by aut,ority of t,e Su#erior )ourt3
    1egarding conduct of Pasterna! acting in collusion +it, t,e Dos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt! James
    Hedic! one of t,e best no+n fraud e(#erts in t,e 2S! and a ,ig,ly decorated 7>' veteran! o#ined
    /U fraud being committedU0 and /333investigation s,ould be immediately institutedU0 B
    ccl(((iii
    C
    5y case #rovided detailed documentation of abuse of Auman 1ig,ts t,roug, +ides#read 4udicial
    corru#tion in t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! Dos %ngeles! in collusion +it, financial institutions
    and large la+ firms3 9,e underlying case +as best summari"ed in t,e 7irst %mended )om#laint in
    %erni& v Connor et al in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia3 B
    ccl(((iv
    C
    5y case also #rovided detailed documentation of t,e #atroni"ing of t,e corru#tion of )alifornia
    4udges by corru#tion in 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! and t,e 2S )ourt of
    %##eals! *t, )ircuit3 :see section )3f)3
    9,e case +as uniIue in its documentation! sinceG
    't commenced in -884 - +ell before t,e onset of t,e financial crisis3
    't involved no default or any debt to t,e offending ban3 'n fact! ' ,ad no business relations,i#
    +it, t,e #er#etrators! )ountry+ide and >an of %merica3 %nd yet! ' +as targeted for real-estate
    fraud by t,ese bans3
    't im#licated t,e most senior officers of )ountry+ide - %ngelo 5o"ilo and Sandor Samuels - and
    t,e most senior officers of >an of %merica - >rian 5oyni,an and @eneral 9ommy 7ran - in
    direct involvement in cor#orate corru#tion and raceteering in t,e courts3 B
    ccl(((v
    C
    't s,o+ed t,at 7>'! 2S De#artment of Justice! S.)! and all baning regulators - )om#troller of
    t,e )urrency! 9,rift Su#ervision! 7ederal 1eserve! 7ederal 9rade )ommission! #atroni"ed suc,
    corru#tion even before t,e onset of t,e financial crisis3 B
    ccl(((vi
    C
    't s,o+ed t,e ey role! in +,at s,ould be deemed raceteering in t,e courts! of some of t,e
    largest la+ firms in t,e 2nited StatesG >ryan )ave! DDP! S,e##ard 5ullin! and >uc,alter =emer3
    B
    ccl(((vii
    C
    't s,o+ed t,e serious retaliation by t,e courts on t,ose! +,o e(#ose t,eir corru#tion3
    a= 'arch <;:; 2 (scaping the US folloing the U$*2US su+mission
    'n t,e mont,s #receding t,e %#ril 1*! -818 =@; submission deadline for t,e 1
    st
    ever 2P1 of t,e
    2nited States! ' increased my efforts to collect court records! documenting t,e corru#tion of t,e
    Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! and t,e 2S )ourt
    of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! as detailed above :sections )1d! )-a!f)3
    Suc, efforts included +ritten communications +it, court #ersonnel! in effort to gain access to
    #ublic records! communications +it, ot,er anti-4udicial activists! for e(c,ange of information and
    records! and also included re#eat a##earances in #erson in t,e office of t,e cler of t,e various
    courts! in an effort to e(ercise t,e 7irst %mendment rig,ts of access to court records to ins#ect and
    to co#y3
    ' +as also increasingly active in disseminating t,e records and information on various online sites!
    including Divelea3com! Scribd3com! and .(aminer3com! +,ere my +riting attracted by t,en
    ,undreds of t,ousands of reads :and by today more t,an - millions)3
    'n communications +it, ot,er anti-4udicial corru#tion activists and ot,er individuals! +,o +ere
    abused by t,e courts! it also became a##arent! t,at all of us came to t,e conclusion t,at t,e 4udges
    +ere acting out of com#liance +it, t,e la+3 Ao+ever! ' +as t,e only one! +,o focused on intensive
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    113/163 TOC:2
    study of t,e mec,anics of t,e electronic record systems of t,e various courts! and documented t,e
    t,at t,e orders and 4udgments! issued by suc, 4udges! +ere void on t,eir faces for lac of valid
    aut,entication and certification3 ' urged t,em ot,er victims of 4udicial abuse to try to gain access to
    records! including in #articular t,e =.7s3
    ;n t,e bacground of communications +it, 1ic,ard 7ine and ot,er anti-4udicial activists across t,e
    2S! and as a result of ot,er unusual incidents! it also became obvious t,at t,e ris to my #ersonal
    security +as steadily gro+ing3
    >y t,at time! it ,as been 3 years t,at anytime ' a##eared in t,e main entrance of t,e )alifornia
    Su#erior )ourt in Dos %ngeles! an armed De#uty S,eriff +as attac,ed to me for t,e entire duration
    of my visit in t,e building :including t,e restrooms)3 ' considered it an effort to intimidate and deny
    access to t,e court3 9,e De#uty S,eriffs t,emselves informed me t,at suc, #ractice +as
    un#recedented3 9,ey e(#lained t,at it resulted from an order issued by Judge JacIueline )onnor3
    1eIuests to access t,e record of suc, Judge JacIueline )onnor order +ere denied3
    7ollo+ing is t,e outline of my activities! relative to efforts to access court records in t,e 2S District
    )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! +,ic, ended u# +it, clear and imminent danger to my life and
    my libertyG
    1eIuest to ins#ect =.7s in sus#ected simulated litigation cases
    'n #articular! my efforts included corres#ondence +it, t,e )ler of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral
    District of )alifornia! 9errry =afisi! and 1ecords Su#ervisor Da+n >ulloc! documenting t,e denial
    of access to court records in t,e cases of Fine v Sheriff of Los Angeles County :-G8*-cv-81*14)
    :section )3a)! %erni& v Connor et al :-G8$-cv-81558) :section )3f)! and US v City of LA et al (2:00-
    cv-11769)3 B
    ccl(((viii
    C
    9,e latter case +as #articularly sensitive! since it #ertained to t,e ongoing large-scale false
    im#risonment in Dos %ngeles )ounty in t,e aftermat, of t,e 1am#art corru#tion scandal :1**$-
    -888)! and failure of t,e 2S federal agencies to tae action! even a decade later3 't became one of
    t,e central issues in A1%Es submission for t,e -818 2P1 of t,e 2S3 B
    ccl(((i(
    C
    %not,er critical issue +as my reIuest for investigation of t,e evidence for adulteration of t,e
    commencing P%).1 record :Petition) in 7ineEs Aabeas )or#us case3 De#uty )ler S,aron 5c@ee!
    'ntae 2nit Su#ervisor! Public De#artment of t,e ;ffice of t,e )ler! su##orted my claims3 S,e
    indicated t,at 5s Donna 9,omas! 5agistrate )arla Hoe,rleEs )ourtroom %ssistant :a title +it, no
    legal aut,ority - eIuivalent of an office secretary) unla+fully ,andled t,e records and constructed
    t,e docet in 7ineEs ,abeas cor#us #etition3 9,at fact is also evident by t,e initials D9 on almost -8
    entries in t,at docet3
    9,e corres#ondence belo+ +as often also co#ied to ot,er relevant court #ersonnel and t,e staff of
    ),ief Judge %udrey )ollins :but =;9 t,e ),ief Judge ,erself)3
    't s,ould be noted t,at eventually! +,en ' got access to t,e =.7s in %erni& v Connor et al and to
    some of t,e =.7s in Fine v Sheriff! t,ey indeed turned out to confirm my sus#icion all along - t,at
    t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia conducted simulated litigation in t,ese t+o
    cases! and many more3
    'n revie+ing t,e events outlined belo+! it s,ould also be noted t,at ),ief Judge %udrey )ollins! and
    )ler of t,e )ourt 9erry =afisi! denied my access to t,e =.7s and refused to tae corrective actions
    once ' uncovered t,e invalid =.7s3 Ao+ever! in t,e case of In *(5 Gottschal&) t,ey in fact
    reaffirmed my claims of invalidity of all clerical and 4udicial records! +,ic, +ere issued +it,
    invalid =.7s3 't +as only t,roug, communications +it, me t,at @ottsc,al! a senior! e(#erienced!
    attorney! +,o +as abused by t,e courts for #rotesting 4udicial corru#tion! got familiar +it, t,e
    #ractice of simulated #rocess t,roug, t,e issuance of invalid =.7s3 H,en ,e! an aut,ori"ed
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    114/163 TOC:2
    )56.)7 user! received t,e Judge )ollins ;rder of Disbarment +it, no valid =.7! ,e c,allenged its
    validity3 %nd t,e note entered in t,e P%).1 docet of t,e case indicates t,at Judge )ollins
    consented and too corrective action3 :see figure belo+)3 Ao+ever! in t,e P%).1 docet of 'n 1.G
    1onald @ottsc,al t,ere +as only one order! so t,at t,e correction +as sim#le3 %##lying t,e same
    corrective action to Fine v Sheriff or %erni& v Connor et al +ould ,ave reIuired eliminating t,e
    entire P%).1 docets3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    115/163 TOC:2
    /igure A00 Invali$ KTex& onl*K $o,ke& en&r*, Dk& Pnone, Do,+%en& $ele&ion an$ re!$o,ke&in" in $n R)' Ronald
    *ottschalk 26811!%,!006I44 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia. The &ex& re!a''ir%s &ha& &he
    Jan+ar* 11, 6016 Or$er o' Dis.ar%en&3)+spension 2$isposi&ive or$er, akin &o j+$"%en& in s+,h ,ase4 /as
    iss+e$ /i&h no C9>, an$ &here'ore /as +na+&hen&i,a&e$, an$ o' no 'or,e an$ e''e,&.
    =o/ever, i& sho+l$ .e no&e$ &ha& &his no&e is a KTex& onl*K $o,ke& en&r* .* a person o' +nkno/n na%e an$
    a+&hori&*, /hi,h is +nsi"ne$ an$ +na+&hen&i,a&e$.
    <onal$ Bo&&s,halk /as a Fos An"eles A&&orne*, /ho like <i,har$ >ine pro&es&e$ j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion. Fike
    <i,har$ >ine he /as 'alsel* arres&e$ in 600A 2al.ei& 'or a 'e/ /eeks onl*4, an$ like <i,har$ >ine he also /as
    'alsel* hospi&alize$. =o/ever, /hereas <i,har$ >ine /as kep& in soli&ar* ,on'ine%en& 'or 1I %on&hs in &he
    hospi&al se,&ion o' &he jail, Bo&&s,halk /as kep& in an o+&si$e ps*,hia&ri, /ar$. =e repor&e$ &ha& he /as
    'or,e$ &o &ake ps*,hia&ri, %e$i,a&ions, /hile .ein" $enie$ ,ri&i,al $ia.e&es %e$i,a&ion.
    Thro+"h ,o%%+ni,a&ion /i&h &he a+&hor o' ins&an& s+.%ission, Bo&&s,halk /as e$+,a&e$ re"ar$in" &he
    si"ni'i,an,e o' &he C9> an$ i&s K9le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK. There'ore, /hen he re,eive$ &he $isposi&ive
    or$er in &his ,ase /i&h an invali$ C9>, he 'ile$ a re0+es& &o $ele&e i& 'ro% &he $o,ke&. -hie' J+$"e A+$re*
    -ollins apparen&l* ,onsen&e$. D
    ,,x,
    E
    The ,on$+,& o' -hie' J+$"e A+$re* -ollins here s&an$s in ,on&ras& /i&h &he re'+sal o' -hie' J+$"e A+$re*
    -ollins an$ -lerk o' &he -o+r& Terr* Ca'isi &o &ake an* ,orre,&ive a,&ions, /hen &he* /ere no&i'ie$ o' &he
    $is,over* o' &he invali$ C9>s in #ine v Sheriff an$ Zernik v onnor et al 2see se,&ion B6a4. The reason %a*
    .e &ha& here, onl* one or$er ha$ &o .e re!$o,ke&e$. In &he &/o 'or%er ,ases, &he en&ire $o,ke& /o+l$ have &o
    .e $ele&e$.
    I& is ins&r+,&ive &ha& .o&h >ine an$ Bo&&s,halk, senior, experien,e$ a&&orne*s, /ho /ere a+&horize$ -@39->
    par&i,ipan&s an$ passe$ &he %an$a&or* ins&r+,&ion, /ere en&irel* +na/are o' &he si"ni'i,an,e o' &he C9> an$
    &he K9le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK 'or vali$i&*, 'or,e an$ e''e,& o' j+$i,ial re,or$s.
    -ul 0#' %AA; - %ttem#t to access court records in Fine v Sheriff of LA County and %erni& v
    Connor et al t,roug, a visit in #erson in t,e ;ffice of t,e )ler of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral
    District of )alifornia +as denied! in a##arent violation of 7irst %mendment and Due Process
    rig,ts3
    August #' %AA; ( )om#laint and reIuest for investigation +ere emailed to 9erry =afisi! )ler of
    t,e 2S District )ourt! in reG 9am#ering +it, court records in t,e ;ffice of t,e )ler3 B
    cc(ci
    C 9,e
    email again reIuested to ins#ect and to co#y t,e =.7s in Fine v Sheriff of LA County and %erni&
    v Connor et al3
    9,e email also detailed evidence for adulteration in t,e commencing record of 7ineEs Aabeas
    )or#us #etition3 7or e(am#le! t,e #etition +as doceted as filed on 5arc, -8! -88*! but it
    included a #ur#orted &Judgment& record by D% Su#erior )ourtEs Judge David ?affe! +,ic, +as
    dated 5arc, -4! -88*3 ;t,er evidence for adulterations in t,e commencing record +ere
    detailed3
    Terr* Ca'isi
    Dis&ri,& -o+r& 9xe,+&ive an$ -lerk o' -o+r&
    2.* e%ail an$ .* priori&* ,er&i'ie$ %ail, res&ri,&e$ $eliver*4
    316 C. )prin" )&ree&, <oo% B!IFos An"eles, -ali'ornia A0016
    &err*Wna'isi,a,$.+s,o+r&s."ov
    Ti%e response re0+es&e$ .* #e$ A+"+s& 7, 600A, 7800p%
    -lerk Ca'isi8
    Please a,,ep& &his le&&er as %* re0+es& 'or inves&i"a&ion in re8 -on,erns re"ar$in"
    $o,ke&in",%ain&enan,e o' -o+r& re,or$s, an$ ,on$+,& o' ,leri,al s&a'' a& &he (.). Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Fos
    An"eles in &he 'ollo/in" ,ases8
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    116/163 TOC:2
    14 >ine v )heri'' Depar&%en& o' FA -o+n&* 2680A!,v!01A144, an$
    64 Zernik v -onnor e& al 2680I!,v!017704
    The &/o ,ases are join&l* repor&e$, sin,e in .o&h ,ases, &he ke* persons involve$ in,l+$e$8
    14 @a"is&ra&e -arla #oehrle
    64 -o+r&roo% Assis&an& Donna Tho%as
    34 Pro )e -lerk -hris )a/*er.
    >or .o&h ,ases re0+es& /as also 'ile$ 'or a,,ess &o C9>s &o inspe,& an$ &o ,op*, an$ a$$i&ional
    ,on,erns %a* .e raise$ 'ollo/in" revie/ o' &he C9>s.
    Ti%e is o' &he essen,e, preli%inar* response is re0+es&e$ .* #e$, A+" 7, 600A, 7800 p%8
    a4 #he&her &he -lerk o' &he -o+r& in&en$s &o &ake an* a,&ion rela&ive &o ins&an& ,o%plain&X
    .4 I' so R /ha& is &he es&i%a&e$ &i%e 'or ,o%ple&ion o' s+,h revie/X
    ,4 I' &he ,o%plain& is revie/e$ R /o+l$ ,o%plainan& Joseph Zernik .e no&i'ie$ o' &he res+l&s o' s+,h
    revie/X
    $4 Is &here an* o&her spe,i'i, pro,e$+re a& &he -o+r& 'or 'ilin" ,o%plain&s on s+,h %a&&ersX
    e4 <e0+es& is herein 'ile$ 'or a,,ess p+rs+an& &o Cixon v #arner -o%%+ni,a&ions, In, 21A7I4 &o
    &he Do,ke& A,&ivi&* <epor&s an$ &o &he -alen$ar o' &he -o+r&s , rela&ive &o .o&h a,&ions, &o inspe,& an$
    &o ,op*.
    1) /ine - Sheri(( ?e#artment !( &A .!unt* (2:09-'--01914)
    Dr Zernik "o& in&eres&e$ in &he ,ase onl* /hen i& /as ,lose &o &he en$ o' &he le"al revie/ pro,ess.
    A,,or$in"l*, Dr Zernik +n,overe$ &he iss+es o' ,on,ern lis&e$ .elo/, onl* ver* re,en&l* R a'&er &he
    le"al revie/ pro,ess /as ,o%ple&e$. Biven &he ,en&ral si"ni'i,an,e o' &he re,or$ in 2a4 .elo/,
    ,on,ern is &ha& an* +n&o/ar$l* even& rela&e$ &o s+,h re,or$ ,o+l$ have res+l&e$ in perversion o'
    j+s&i,e, an$ &he on"oin" jailin" o' a person /hi,h sho+l$ have .een release$ 'ro% jailin".
    a) Pur#!rte" Cu"ge ?a-i" Ea((e >ar'h 46 2009 Cu"gment (!r .!ntem#t F1626=G a##earing a
    #art !( the re'!r" (?8t H16 ?8t H1@)0
    )+,h j+$"%en& 'or ,on&e%p& a"ains& A&& <i,har$ >ine is &he ,en&ral $o,+%en& in &he en&ire ,ase.
    -on,erns are raise$ re"ar$in" &he vali$i&* o' .o&h ,opies o' &he re,or$, /hi,h appear in &he $o,ke&.
    =o/ever, pri%ar* ,on,ern in &his le&&er res&s /i&h -ope P1, an$ &he possi.ili&* &ha& i& /as a$+l&era&e$
    a'&er .ein" 'ile$ as a re,or$ a& &he (.). Dis&ri,& -o+r&, FA.
    Inheren& $e'e,& is apparen& in .o&h ,opies o' &he p+rpor&e$ J+$"e Davi$ Ha''e @ar,h 4, 600A
    J+$"%en& in,l+$e$ in li&i"a&ion re,or$s in &his ,ase 2-opies P1, P6! >oo&no&es P1, P6, respe,&ivel*4.
    )+,h J+$"%en& .ears a >IF9D s&a%p o' &he FA )+perior -o+r& $a&e$ @ar,h 4, 600A. -op* P1 o' &he
    J+$"e Davi$ Ha''e @ar,h 4, 600A J+$"%en& /as la&er in,orpora&e$ as an exhi.i& in &he =a.eas
    -orp+s Pe&i&ion o' A&& <i,har$ >ine, .earin" a >IF9D s&a%p o' &he (.). Dis& -r&, FA, $a&e$ &hro+"h
    han$!al&era&ion @ar,h 60, 600A. -op* P6 /as 'ile$ as an exhi.i& on @a* 1, 600A. =o/ever, .o&h
    -op* P1 an$ -op* P6 o' &he J+$"%en& are $a&e$ @a,h 64, 600A .* han$!/ri&in" per&ainin" &o an$
    a$ja,en& &o &he veri'i,a&ion a&&ri.+&e$ &o J+$"e Davi$ Ha''e on &he las& pa"es o' &he respe,&ive -op*
    P1 an$ -op* P6 o' &he p+rpor&e$ j+$"%en& re,or$s.
    A&& >ine repor&s &ha& &he ,op* &ha& he provi$e$ 'or s+.%ission /i&h ?8t H1, ha$ no $a&e en&ere$ in i&.
    The $o,ke&in" &ex& o' ?8t H1 re'ers &o ,han"es or %o$i'i,a&ions in &he re,or$s &ha& &ook pla,e on
    @ar,h 64, 600A, al.ei&, &he exa,& na&+re o' &he %o$i'i,a&ion is no& spelle$ o+&.
    On J+l* 60, 600A I raise$ s+,h ,on,erns re"ar$in" &he p+rpor&e$ @ar,h 4, 600A re,or$ /i&h @s
    )haron @,Bee, )+pervisor o' Opera&ions in &he -lerkMs O''i,e. )he pro%ise$ %e &o look in&o &he
    %a&&er.
    On J+l* 67, 600A I $is,+sse$ &he %a&&er /i&h @s @,Bee a"ain. A& &ha& &i%e she in'or%e$ %e &ha& she
    ,on,+rre$ /i&h %* opinion &ha& &here /as reason 'or ,on,ern in &his re"ar$, an$ she in'or%e$ %e &ha&
    she raise$ &he iss+e /i&h &he ,o+r& o' @a"is&ra&e #oehrle.
    b) )able !( .!ntent !( e$hibit that 4ere (ile" 4ith Petiti!n t! .ali(!rnia .!urt !( A##eal6
    2n" ?itri't6 an" in'!r#!rate" a #art !( re'!r" (?8t H1) F4G
    The &i&les o' 4 exhi.i&s8 P4,7,?,7 are %issin" in &he re,or$ &ha& is &o$a* seen in PA-9<, an$ no 9xhi.i&
    C+%.ers are sho/n. D+e &o ver* li%i&e$ ,o%%+ni,a&ions oppor&+ni&* /i&h jaile$ A&& <i,har$ >ine, I
    $i$ no& have &he oppor&+ni&* &o revie/ &he iss+e /i&h hi% prior &o &his $a&e. =o/ever, I a% 'or/ar$in"
    &o hi% a ,op* o' &his le&&er, hopin" &ha& he respon$ an$ s&a&e /ha& /as &he na&+re o' &he respe,&ive
    pa"e in &he $o,+%en& &ha& he provi$e$ 'or 'ilin" in ,o+r&.
    ') &etter "ate" >ar'h 206 2009 in'lu"e" a #art !( the re'!r" (?8t H1) F7E
    Fe&&er $a&e$ @ar,h 60, 600A 'ro% Dep+&* -lerk -hris )a/*er &o A&& <i,har$ >ine ,o+l$ no& possi.l*
    .e par& o' &he 'ilin" .* A&& <i,har$ >ine, an$ i& is +n,lear /h* i& is represen&e$ as s+,h.
    ") N!ti'e !( Re(eren'e t! a >agitrate Cu"ge (?8t H2)
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    117/163 TOC:2
    The assi"n%en& &o a j+$"e is lis&e$ per BO 07!06.-on,ern is &ha& no s+,h Beneral Or$er ,o+l$ .e
    'o+n$.
    e) N!ti'e !( .leri'al ,rr!r in re: Stam# /%&,? !n ?8t H1 (?8t H=)
    The $o,ke&in" &ex& s&a&es8
    033643600A3 COTI-9 O> -F9<I-AF 9<<O<8 On &he pe&i&ion &he $a&e /as @ar,h 1A, 600A, /hi,h is
    in,orre,&. The ,orre,& $a&e is @ar,h 60, 600A. 2rn4 29n&ere$8033643600A4
    -on,ern is re"ar$in" ,on'l+en,e o' +n+s+al even&s rela&ive &o Dk& P1 on @ar,h 64, 600A.
    () N!ti'e !( .leri'al ,rr!r in re: Aignment t! 9u"ge (?8t H4)
    The $o,ke&in" &ex& s&a&es8
    033673600A4 COTI-9 O> -F9<I-AF 9<<O<8 D+e &o ,leri,al error &he -ase has .een reassi"ne$
    'ro% J+$"e Dean D. Pre"erson &o J+$"e Beor"e = #+ 'or all '+r&her pro,ee$in"s. The ,ase /ill no/
    re'le,& &he ini&ials o' &he &rans'eree J+$"e -N0A!01A14 B# 2-#4. 2rn4 29n&ere$8 033673600A4
    -on,ern is &ha& in 'a,& re,+sal o' a j+$"e, or +n$oin" o' invali$ assi"n%en&, /hi,h /ere no& -leri,al
    9rrors /ere in,orre,&l* re,or$e$.
    2) Ierni8 - .!nn!r et al (2:0B-'--01220)
    a) .ae numbering 7 unuual 'lutering 4ith unrelate" 'ae6 4hi'h !n it(a'e a##ear in
    -i!lati!n !( /R.P Rule A9 (a)(1)
    )ele,& a ,ase8
    680I!,v!01770!NAP!-# Joseph Zernik v. Ja,0+eline -onnor e& al 2,lose$4
    680I!%j!01770!D(TH ()A v. @ar&inez 2,lose$4
    780I!,v!01770!)BF!OP =e,&or @ar&inez v. Fi&&on Foan )ervi,in" FP e& al2,lose$4
    b) A"ulterati!n !( Plainti((5 umm!n6 an" "!'8eting !( (ale an" "eliberatel* milea"ing
    umm!n a #art !( '!urt re'!r" in Pa'er (?8tH1)0
    On &he $a* o' 'ilin" &he ,o%plain&, Plain&i'' presen&e$ Pro )e -lerk, -hris )a/*er, /i&h vali$
    )+%%ons. @r )a/*er re'+se$ &o veri'* an$ iss+e s+,h s+%%ons, an$ insis&e$ on "enera&in" on his
    o/n, o+& o' ,o%plian,e /i&h <+les o' -o+r&, 'alse an$ $eli.era&el* %islea$in" s+%%ons, /hi,h he
    &hen pro,ee$e$ &o $o,ke& +n$er &he ,o%plain& in ?8t H1. )+,h ,on$+,& sho+l$ .e $ee%e$ +pon
    revie/ o.s&r+,&ion o' j+s&i,e, $enial o' a,,ess &o &he ,o+r& an$ &o 'air &rial.
    ') N!ti'e !( Re(eren'e t! Unite" State >agitrate Cu"ge (?8t H4)
    The assi"n%en& &o a j+$"e is lis&e$ per BO 07!06.-on,ern is &ha& no s+,h Beneral Or$er ,o+l$ .e
    'o+n$.
    ") Or"er Returning .ae /!r Reaignment U#!n Re'ual (?8tH@6 HA6HB6 H96 H10)
    The re!assi"n%en& &o a %a"is&ra&e j+$"e is lis&e$ per BO 07!06.-on,ern is &ha& no s+,h Beneral
    Or$er ,o+l$ .e 'o+n$.
    e) &!ng "ela* % "!'8eting !( Plainti((5 #a#er6 an" !ther irregularitie6 reulting in
    ubtantial "i-ergen'e !( the re'!r" (r!m !r"inal e:uen'e0
    As a res+l& o' vario+s $ela*s i%pose$ onl* on Plain&i''Ms papers, a& &i%es over a %on&h, &he $o,ke&
    sho/s re,or$s &ha& $iver"e s+.s&an&iall* 'ro% or$inal se0+en,e.
    () ?!'8eting !( unrelate" #a#er un"er the ame re'!r" number an" the ame "!'8eting te$t
    (?!'8et H226 H2@6 H2B)
    -on,ern is &ha& s+,h ,on$+,& res+l&e$ in &he ,on,eal%en& o' ,ri&i,al re,or$s.
    g) /ailure t! "!'8et re'!r" 4ith Pa'er hea"er e'urit* blue im#rint
    A n+%.er o' re,or$s /ere $o,ke&e$ /i&h no .l+e hea$er i%prin&, a& &i%es, s+,h ina$e0+a&e $o,ke&in"
    /as ,orre,&e$ a'&er ,o%plain&s /ere 'ile$ /i&h >BI.
    h) Pr!!( !( Ser-i'e !( Summ!n an" .!m#laint (?8t H4=)
    >alse re,or$s /ere $o,ke&e$.
    i) Pr!!( !( Ser-i'e !( Summ!n an" .!m#laint (?8t H4=)
    >alse re,or$in" +n$er <ela&e$ Transa,&ions.
    9) Cu"gment (?8t H10A)
    >alse re"is&ra&ion as seen in <ela&e$ &ransa,&ions R +nrela&e$ &o -o%plain& 2Dk&P14, /hi,h /as le'&
    +n&er%ina&e$.
    =) .!n'ern a##li'able t! b!th 'ae
    a) All!4ing (iling !( #a#er b* att!rne* 4ith n! N!ti'e !( A##earan'e b* .!unel
    A& leas& in one ,ase R 'ilin" o' papers .* Br*an -ave, FFP 'or -o+n&r*/i$e, &he evi$en,e is ra&her
    ,on,l+sive &ha& Br*an -ave, FFP, /as never a+&horize$ &o appear as ,o+nsel o' re,or$ in ,o+r& 'or
    ei&her -o+n&r*/i$e or Bank o' A%eri,a. Ins&ea$, Br*an -ave, FFP an$ -o+n&r*/i$e an$3or Bank o'
    A%eri,a -orpora&ion en"a"e$ in /ha& %+s& .e $ee%e$ +pon revie/ repea& o' ,on$+,& &ha& /as
    re.+ke$ .* &he =on Je'' Boh%, (.). J+$"e, Texas, an$ /hi,h -o+n&r*/i$e pro%ise$ &ha& -o+r& no&
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    118/163 TOC:2
    &o repea& 2,ase o' Borro/er Parsle*, Co 07!A0374,@e%oran$+% Opinion 2Dk& P64I4.
    b) /ailure t! #r!-i"e" a"e:uate .!r#!rate ?i'l!ure in a timel* manner6an"J!r in'lui!n !(
    .!r#!rate "ata (r!m un8n!4n !ur'e0
    The ,o+r& 'aile$ &o en'or,e &he la/ in re8 -orpora&e Dis,los+res, an$ in,l+$e$ ,orpora&e $a&a 'ro%
    +nkno/n so+r,es.
    ') Ue !( manual tam# -eru ele'tr!ni' tam# K/%&,?L0
    In .o&h ,ases ,er&ain re,or$s /ere s&a%pe$ :>IF9D; +sin" a %an+al s&a%ps ins&ea$ &he ele,&roni,
    s&a%ps %os& ,o%%onl* +se$ a& &he ,o+r&. -on,ern is &ha& s+,h s&a%ps on s+,h re,or$s represen&e$
    re&roa,&ive s&a%pin" o' &he re,or$s.
    ") ?elegati!n !( the .ler85 auth!rit* t! .!urtr!!m Aitant0
    In .o&h ,ases ,er&ain ,leri,al '+n,&ions /ere ,arrie$ o+& .* @s Donna Tho%as,/ho is +pon
    in'or%a&ion an$ .elie' -o+r&roo% Assis&an&. -on,ern is /he&her s+,h '+n,&ions are in$ee$ $ele"a&e$
    &o -o+r&roo% Assis&an&s .* &he -lerk o' &he -o+r&.
    e) Parti'i#ati!n !( ?e#ut* .ler86 8n!4ingl*6 in "!'8eting re'!r" that ma* n!t be authenti'
    '!urt re'!r"
    -on,ern is re"ar$in" ,on$+,& o' $ep+&* ,lerks or ,o+r&roo% assis&an&s, /hi,h %a* ,ons&i&+&e
    $o,ke&in" o' re,or$s, /hi,h on &heir 'a,e /ere no& a+&hen&i, ,o+r& re,or$s, e.". R s+%%ons in Zernik
    v -onnor e& al. )+,h ,on$+,& &ha& %a* have &aken pla,e, %a* .e $ee%e$ +pon revie/ pro$+,&ion o'
    'alse an$ $eli.era&el* %islea$in" li&i"a&ion re,or$s, an$ o.s&r+,&ion o' j+s&i,e an$3or perversion o'
    j+s&i,e.
    () Parti'i#ati!n !( ?e#ut* .ler86 8n!4ingl*6 in .!urt '!n"u't that ma* n!t be legitimate '!urt
    #r!'e"ure6 an" that ma* be "eeme" u#!n re-ie4 a abui-e !n it (a'e0
    -on,ern is re"ar$in" ,on$+,& o' $ep+&* ,lerks or ,o+r&roo% assis&an&s, /hi,h %a* have involve$
    par&i,ipa&ion in ,o+r& ,on$+,& &ha& o+& o' ,o%plian,e /i&h a+&hen&i,, vali$, ,o+r& pro,e$+res, an$ %a*
    .e $ee%e$ +pon revie/ as a.+sive in na&+re, e.". R Dis,repan,* pro,e$+res in Zernik v -onnor e&
    al, /hi,h /ere never re,or$e$ .* &he ,o+r&, .+& /ere re,or$e$ .* plain&i'' as :Perver&e$ Dis,repan,*
    Pro,e$+res; (?8t H102).
    Thank *o+ 'or *o+r a&&en&ion &o &his %a&&er.
    Da&e$8 A+"+s& 1, 600A
    JO)9P= = Z9<CIG
    WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
    B*8 Joseph = Zernik
    1I73 >oo&hill Blv$, FN, -A A1770
    Tel8 23634 717 47I35 >ax8 2I014 AAI 0A175
    jz16347ear&hlink.ne&
    ..:
    <i,har$ I. >ine
    2B* ()P) 'irs& ,lass %ail S .* e%ail &o %%4
    Prisoner A&&orne* 21I643?74
    Pro )e Pe&i&ioner
    FO) ACB9F9) -O(CTH JAIF
    T/in To/ers 470 Ba+,he& )&.
    Fos An"eles, -A A0016
    WWWWWWWW
    1 J+$"e Davi$ Ha''e @ar,h 4, 600A J+$"%en& 'or -on&e%p&, -op* P18 A&& <i,har$ >ineMs =a.eas
    -orp+s Pe&i&ion, (.). Dis& -r&, FA 2Dk& P14 as re,en&l* seen in Pa,er8
    h&&p833inproperinla.,o%300!00!00!+s!$is&!,&!la!'ine!v!la!,o+n&*!sheri''!$o,!01!exh!0A!03!04!j+$"%en&!
    ,on&e%p&.p$'
    6 J+$"e Davi$ Ha''e @ar,h 4, 600A J+$"%en& 'or -on&e%p&, -op* P68 A&& <i,har$ >ineMs =a.eas
    -orp+s Pe&i&ion, (.). Dis& -r&, FA 2Dk& P1?4 as re,en&l* seen in Pa,er8
    h&&p833inproperinla.,o%300!00!00!+s!$is&!,&!la!'ine!v!la!,o+n&*!sheri''!$o,!1?!6Wexh!a!j+$"%en&!o'!
    ,on&e%p&!in!%arina!hoa!v!la!,o+n&*.p$'
    3 Par&* in In&eres& Dr Joseph Zernik, an$ like/ise A&& <i,har$ >ine are *e& &o "ain a,,ess &o
    a+&hen&i,a&e$ ,opies o' an* o' &he (.). -o+r& re,or$s $is,+sse$ here
    4 TO- o' 9xhi.i&s &ha& /ere par& o' a pe&i&ion 'ile$ /i&h -ali'ornia -o+r& o' Appeals, 6n$ Dis&ri,&,
    appears as p46, Dk& P1!68
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    119/163 TOC:2
    h&&p833inproperinla.,o%300!00!00!+s!$is&!,&!la!'ine!v!la!,o+n&*!sheri''!$o,!01!exh!0A!03!06!pe&i&ion!&o!
    ,al!,&!app!6n$!&o,!exhi.i&s.p$'
    7 Fe&&er $a&e$ @ar,h 60, 600A 'ro% Dep+&* -lerk -hris )a/*er &o A&& <i,har$ >ine.
    Se$tember #6' %AA; - %ttem#t to access court records in Fine v Sheriff of LA County and %erni&
    v Connor et al t,roug, #ersonal a##earance in t,e ;ffice of t,e )ler +as denied3 B
    cc(cii
    C
    ?,.&ARA)%ON O/ COS,PH H I,RN%M
    IC <98 )ep&e%.er 1I, 600A visi& &o &he (ni&e$ )&a&es Dis&ri,& -o+r& Fos An"eles.
    I, JO)9P= = Z9<CIG, here.* $e,lare as 'ollo/s8This $e,lara&ion /as /ri&&en as a %e%oran$+% o'
    %* )ep&e%.er 1I, 600A visi& &o &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Fos An"eles. I have personal kno/le$"e o' &he
    'a,&s se& 'or&h herein, /hi,h I kno/ &o .e &r+e an$ ,orre,&, ex,ep& as &o &hose %a&&ers &herein s&a&e$
    as .ase$ +pon in'or%a&ion an$ .elie', an$ as &o &o &hose %a&&ers, I .elieve &he% &o .e &r+e an$
    ,orre,& as /ell. I' ,alle$ as a /i&ness, I ,o+l$ an$ /o+l$ ,o%pe&en&l* &es&i'* /i&h respe,& &here&o.
    1. @* visi& &o &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Fos An"eles, O''i,e o' &he -lerk, <e,or$s Depar&%en& /as par& o'
    %* on"oin" e''or&s 'or a& leas& &/o an$ a hal' *ears, &o exer,ise in vario+s ,o+r&s %* ri"h&s p+rs+an&
    &o &he >irs& A%en$%en& &o &he (ni&e$ )&a&es -ons&i&+&ion an$ Cixon v #arner -o%%+ni,a&ions, In,
    21A7I4 R &o a,,ess ,o+r& re,or$s R &o inspe,& an$ &o ,op*.
    6. D+rin" &ha& visi& I presen&e$ &he Dep+&* -lerk o' $+&*, /ho s&a&e$ his na%e /as 9$$*
    <a%irez,/i&h a /ri&&en re0+es& &o a,,ess ,o+r& re,or$s R &o inspe,& an$ &o ,op* ! in %* ,ase R
    Zernik v onnor et al 2680I!,v!017704 an$ in &he ,ase o' <i,har$ >ine ! #ine v Sheriff 2680A!,v!
    01A144.
    3. ,$hibit 1 is a &r+e an$ ,orre,& ,op* o' &he le&&er re0+es& &ha& I presen&e$ &o @r 9$$* <a%irez.
    4. @r <a%irez i%presse$ %* ,op* o' &he le&&er /i&h &he s&a%p :<e,eive$ K.
    7. I also presen&e$ @r <a%irez /i&h &he re0+es& &o a,,ess ,o+r& papers .* ,o%ple&in" &he paper
    'or%s &ha& /ere provi$e$ .* &he O''i,e o' &he -lerk 'or &ha& p+rpose.
    ?. ,$hibit 2 is a &r+e an$ ,orre,& ,op* o' &he ,o%ple&e$ paper 'or%s &ha& I s+.%i&&e$ &o @r 9$$*
    <a%irez as par& o' %* re0+es& &o a,,ess ,o+r& re,or$s R &o inspe,& an$ &o ,op*.7. @* re0+es&s
    per&aine$ &o &/o ,ases o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, Fos An"eles8
    a4 -oseph Zernik v -ac<ueline onnor et al 2680I!,v!017704 ! /here I s+e$ so%e 10 j+$"es o'
    &he FA )+perior -o+r&, A&&orne* Davi$ Pas&ernak, -o+n&r*/i$eLs -hie' Fe"al O''i,er !)an$or
    )a%+els an$ -9O An"elo @ozilo 'or /ha& /as ,lai%e$ &o a%o+n& &o ra,ke&eerin". I .elieve$
    &ha& &he () -o+r& s+.je,&e$ %e &o a sha% ,o+r& a,&ion in &he ,ase,an$ &ha& none o' &he or$ers
    an$ also &he j+$"%en& /ere hones&, vali$, an$ e''e,&+al ,o+r& papers. Ins&ea$ &he* /ere voi$,
    no& voi$a.le.
    .4 Richard #ine v Sheriff Department of %os Angeles ounty 2680A!,v!01A144 ! &he ha.eas
    ,orp+s pe&i&ion o' <i,har$ >ine. I .elieve$ &ha& &he () -o+r& s+.je,&e$ <i,har$ >ine &o a sha%
    ,o+r& a,&ion in &he ,ase, an$ &ha& none o' &he or$ers an$ also &he j+$"%en& /ere hones&, vali$,
    an$ e''e,&+al ,o+r& papers. Ins&ea$ R &he* /ere voi$, no& voi$a.le.
    I. In .o&h ,ases I ha$ also previo+sl* 'ile$ ,o%plain&s re"ar$in" alle"e$ a$+l&era&ion o' re,or$s 'ile$
    in ,o+r& on paper .* pro se 'ilers.
    A. D+rin" &he )ep&e%.er 1I, 600A visi&, I /as $enie$ a,,ess &o all re,or$s, /hi,h I re0+es&e$ a,,ess
    &o. A,,ess &o paper re,or$s /as $enie$ on )ep&e%.er 1I, 600A, +n$er &he ,lai% &ha& &he paper
    re,or$s ha$ alrea$* .een shre$$e$. =o/ever, /hen I re0+es&e$ a,,ess &o &he ,o+r&
    re,or$s,$o,+%en&in" &he ,lai%e$ shre$$in", s+,h a,,ess /as $enie$.
    10. A,,ess &o no re,or$s /ha&soever /as "aine$ $+rin" &he visi& o' )ep&e%.er 1I, 600A.
    11. A&&a,he$ &o &his $e,lara&ion are8
    ,$hibit 18 )ep&e%.er 1I, 600A <e0+es& .* Joseph Zernik &o a,,ess ,o+r& re,or$s,
    s&a%pe$:<e,eive$; an$ ins,ri.e$ /i&h &he na%e o' 9$$* <a%irez .* &he Dep+&* -lerk o' $+&*.
    ,$hibit 28 )ep&e%.er 1I, 600A <e0+es& .* Joseph Zernik &o a,,ess ,o+r& re,or$s, +sin" 'or%s
    provi$e$ .* &he O''i,e o' &he -lerk.
    I $e,lare +n$er penal&* o' perj+r* +n$er &he la/s o' &he )&a&e o' -ali'ornia an$ &he (ni&e$ )&a&es &ha&
    &he 'ore"oin" is &r+e an$ ,orre,&. 9xe,+&e$ &his 3r$ $a* in Jan+ar*, 6010, in Fos An"eles -o+n&*,
    -ali'ornia.
    Joseph = Zernik
    B*
    WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
    JO)9P= = Z9<CIG
    PO Box 76?, Fa Nerne, -ali'ornia A1770
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    120/163 TOC:2
    Tel8 23634 717!47I3 >ax82I014 AAI!0A17
    Yjz16347ear&hlink.ne&Z
    +ecember %;' %AA; - 'n an a##earance in t,e ;ffice of t,e )ler! a letter to )ler of t,e )ourt
    9erry =afisi +as filed! +,ic, again ased to ins#ect and to co#y t,e =.7s in Fine v Sheriff of LA
    County and %erni& v Connor et al.
    During t,is visit! co#ies +ere obtained ofG B
    cc(ciii
    C
    - % series of invalid =.7s in %erni& v Connor et al 2 all of t,em missing t,e &.lectronic
    Document Stam#&! and
    - % single invalid =.7 :for t,e 5andate) in Fine v Sheriff 2 also missing t,e &.lectronic
    Document Stam#&3 9,e lie+ise invalid =.7 of t,e Judgment +as ins#ected! but reIuest for a
    co#y +as denied3
    9,e integrity! or lac t,ereof! of t,e =.7s in %erni& v Connor et al) discovered on December -*!
    -818! +as summari"ed in a table form! s,o+n belo+3 B
    cc(civ
    C
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    121/163 TOC:2
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    122/163 TOC:2
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    123/163 TOC:2
    /igure A10 Ta.le s+%%ar* o' C9>s in Zernik v onnor et al, $is,overe$ on De,e%.er 6A, 600A in &he O''i,e
    o' -lerk, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia.
    Co&e8
    i0 Cone o' &he re0+es&e$ C9>s ,on&aine$ a ,o%ple&e K9le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK.
    ii. O' &he 64 re0+es&e$ C9>s, onl* I /ere 'o+n$ &o in,l+$e &r+n,a&e$ K9le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK.
    iii. C9>s 'or &he 'ollo/in" ,ri&i,al re,or$s in,l+$e$ no K9le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK a& all8
    a. Iss+an,e o' )+%%onses,
    .. Assi"n%en&s an$ <eassi"n%en&s &o J+$"es
    ,. Assi"n%en&s an$ <eassi"n%en&s &o @a"is&ra&es
    $. All @in+&es /hi,h /ere exa%ine$.
    e. Or$er Den*in" Dis0+ali'i,a&ion 'or a -a+se
    '. Co&i,e an$ <epor& an$ <e,o%%en$a&ion .* @a"is&ra&e.
    ". Or$er A$op&in" <epor& an$ <e,o%%en$a&ion .* J+$"e
    h. J+$"%en& .* J+$"e.
    Summar*:
    Dis,over* o' &he C9>s provi$e$ &he $e'ini&ive evi$en,e o' li&i"a&ion &ha& /as ,on$+,&e$ 'ro% s&ar& &o 'inish as
    invali$ ,o+r& pro,ess, /here a j+$"e an$ a %a"is&ra&e si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion /i&h no a+&hori&* a& all.
    -anuar 1' %A#A - 7ollo+ing t,e discovery on December -*! -88*! of t,e invalidity of t,e =.7s
    in %erni& v Connor et al) reIuest for clarification +as emailed to )ler of t,e )ourt 9erry =afisiG
    B
    cc(cv
    C
    <evie/ o' &he $o,ke& an$ &he C9>s $e%ons&ra&e$ &ha& a n+%.er o' persons exe,+&e$ &ransa,&ions in
    &he $o,ke& o' &he a.ove re'eren,e$ ,ase. =o/ever, none o' &he% /as i$en&i'ie$ .* na%e. @oreover,
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    124/163 TOC:2
    no/here /as an* s&a&e%en& 'o+n$ &o &he e''e,& &ha& s+,h &ransa,&ions an$ s+,h $o,ke& /ere, in 'a,&,
    exe,+&e$ .* Dep+&* -lerks an$ .* a+&hori&* o' -lerk o' &he -o+r&, Terr* Ca'isi.
    I &here'ore re0+es& &he 'ollo/in" ,lari'i,a&ions &hro+"h s&a&e%en&s on &he re,or$ .* Terr* Ca'isi, -lerk
    o' &he -o+r&8
    14 Tha& :$&; $i$3$i$ no& re'er &o @s Donna Tho%as.
    64 Tha& @s Donna Tho%as /as3/as no& a+&horize$ as a Dep+&* -lerk $+rin" &he perio$ ,overe$ .*
    &he $o,ke& o' Zernik v onnor et al 2680I!,v!017704. In ,ase @s Tho%as /as in$ee$ a+&horize$,
    please provi$e &he $a&e o' her appoin&%en& as Dep+&* -lerk.
    34 Tha& &ransa,&ions .* @s Donna Tho%as in &he $o,ke& o' Zernik v onnor et al
    2680I!,v!017704 /ere3/ere no& exe,+&e$ .* a+&hori&* o' Terr* Ca'isi, -lerk o' &he -o+r&.
    44 Tha& &he re'+sal on @ar,h 7!7, 600I, .* -hris )a/*er, Pro )e -lerk, &o iss+e s+%%onses
    prepare$ .* Plain&i'' in Zernik v onnor et al 2680I!,v!017704, an$ his iss+an,e ins&ea$ o'
    s+%%onses prepare$ .* -hris )a/*er, Pro )e -lerk, hi%sel', /hi,h /ere $o,ke&e$ +n$er &he
    ,o%plain& 2Dk& P14, an$ no&a&e$ in &he +nn+%.ere$ se,on$ $o,ke& slo&, /as3/as no& .* a+&hori&* o'
    Terr* Ca'isi, -lerk o' &he -o+r&.
    74 Tha& all o&her &ransa,&ions in &his $o,ke&, /hi,h /ere exe,+&e$ .* ,o+r& personnel, /ere3/ere no&
    exe,+&e$ .* a+&hori&* o' Terr* Ca'isi, -lerk o' &he -o+r&.
    ?4 Tha& &he $o,ke& o' Zernik v onnor et al 2680I!,v!017704, as $ispla*e$ in PA-9< /as3/as no&
    $ee%e$ .* &he -lerk o' &he -o+r& an hones&, vali$, an$ e''e,&+al $o,ke& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es
    -o+r&,p+rs+an& &o (ni&e$ )&a&es la/.
    =o res#onse +as ever received on t,is reIuest3
    -anuar 1' %A#A - 1eIuest +as emailed to )ler of t,e )ourt 9erry =afisi! for clarification 1.G %erni& v
    Connor et al :-G8$-cv-81558)! Fine v Sheriff :-G8*-cv-81*14)! In re5 *ichard Fine :-G8*-mc-
    881-*)! and US v City of LA et al 9<5;;2cv2::FD0=5 Denial of access to records! and validity of
    im#lementation of P%).1 and )56.)7 in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia!
    #ursuant to @eneral ;rder 8$-8-3 9,e reIuest in #art saysG B
    cc(cvi
    C
    Thanks a"ain &o @s Da/n B+llo,k 'or her help an$ her pa&ien,e $+rin" %* visi& &o &he -lerkMs
    <e,or$s Depar&%en& on De,e%.er 6A, 600A. D+rin" &ha& visi&, I s+.%i&&e$ a /ri&&en re0+es& &o
    a,,ess ,o+r& re,or$s, p+rs+an& &o Cixon v #arner -o%%+ni,a&ions, In, 21A7I4. D1E
    The vas& %ajori&* o' %* re0+es&s &o a,,ess ,o+r& re,or$s, &o inspe,& an$ &o ,op*, /ere $enie$. I a%
    /ri&in" &o re0+es& a /ri&&en explana&ion 'or s+,h $enial o' a,,ess8
    14 @* re0+es&s &o a,,ess re,or$s 'ro% 'o+r $i''eren& paper ,o+r& 'iles 2re'eren,e$ a.ove4, even %*
    o/n ,ase, /ere $enie$. Dep+&* -lerk John ini&iall* ,lai%e$ &ha& &he paper 'ilin"s /ere $es&ro*e$
    i%%e$ia&el* +pon s,annin". #hen I s+""es&e$ &ha& i& ,o+l$ no& possi.l* .e &he ,ase, he &ra,ke$
    .a,k. Cever&heless ! I /as $enie$ a,,ess &o an* paper ,o+r& 'ile re,or$s.
    64 @* re0+es&s &o a,,ess ele,&roni, ,o+r& 'ile re,or$s in -@39-> ! spe,i'i,all* ! &he Co&i,es o'
    9le,&roni, >ilin"s 2C9>s4 o' &he sa%e 'o+r ,o+r& 'iles, /ere like/ise $enie$ ! even in %* o/n ,ase
    !/i&h no explana&ion a& all.
    34 @* re0+es&s &o a,,ess re,or$s, /hi,h $o,+%en&e$ &he shre$$in" o' &he ,lai%e$!&o!.e!shre$$e$
    paper ,o+r& 'iles, /ere like/ise $enie$ ! /i&h no explana&ion a& all.
    44 @* re0+es&s &o a,,ess 2&o o.&ain ,opies4 paper prin&o+&s o' ele,&roni, ,o+r& 'ile R &he C9>s in &he
    sa%e 'o+r ,ases, /ere like/ise $enie$, /i&h &he ex,ep&ion o' prin&o+&s o' &he C9>s in %* o/n ,ase,
    Zernik v -onnor e& al, /hi,h I /as provi$e$ .* @s B+llo,k, an$ 'or /hi,h I &hanke$ her.
    74 @s B+llo,k an$ I ha$ a $e&aile$ &e,hni,al $is,+ssion in re8a4 The le"al 'o+n$a&ion, i' an*, 'or &he
    opera&ion o' -@39-> a& &he () -o+r& 'or &he -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia5.4 The spe,i'i, '+n,&ion o'
    &he C9>s in &ha& s*s&e%, an$ i&s le"al 'o+n$a&ion, i' an*5,4 Denial o' p+.li, a,,ess &o &he C9>s, an$
    i&s le"al 'o+n$a&ion, i' an*.
    ?4 @s B+llo,k s&a&e$ &ha& &he 'o+n$a&ion 'or &he opera&ion o' -@39-> a& &he -ali'ornia -en&ral Dis&ri,&
    /as in &he Beneral Or$er 0I!06. >ro% %e%or*, I &ol$ her &ha& s+,h or$er /as +n+s+al a%on" &he
    Beneral Or$ers ! sin,e i& ha$ no na%e o' a j+$"e /ho a+&hore$ i&, le& alone a si"na&+re, an$
    like/ise,ha$ no a&&es&a&ion .* a ,lerk. There'ore, I 0+es&ione$ i&s vali$i&* an$ e''e,&. @s B+llo,k
    ,he,ke$ i& +p, apparen&l* 'o+n$ %* re,olle,&ion &o .e ,orre,&, an$ &hen &ol$ %e &ha& she /o+l$ "e&
    .a,k &o %e on &he iss+e.
    74 @s B+llo,k like/ise s&a&e$ &ha& &he $enial o' a,,ess &o C9>s, ex,ep& in oneLs o/n ,ase, /as
    'o+n$e$ in Beneral Or$er 0I!06. I ,hallen"e$ her 'ro% %e%or* on &ha& iss+e as /ell. I s&a&e$ 'ro%
    %e%or* &ha& C9>s /ere %en&ione$ onl* in one or &/o para"raphs o' &he or$er, .+& no re'eren,e /as
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    125/163 TOC:2
    %a$e &o a,,ess, onl* &o &he C9>s '+n,&ion as ,er&i'*in" ,o+r& re,or$s, an$ also as a+&hen&i,a&in"
    servi,e an$ en&r* o' par&iesL papers, an$ o' ,o+r& or$ers an$ j+$"%en&s. A"ain ! @s B+llo,k sai$ &ha&
    she /o+l$ resear,h &he %a&&er.
    I4 @s B+llo,k s&a&e$ &ha& &he $enial o' a,,ess &o C9>s res+l&e$ 'ro% &he 'a,& &ha& personal
    in'or%a&ion /as in,l+$e$ in &he%. I ,hallen"e$ &ha& ans/er, sin,e &he sa%e in'or%a&ion /as also
    provi$e$ in &he Par&ies an$ A&&orne*s pa"e R /hi,h /as p+.li,l* a,,essi.le. @s B+llo,k a"ree$ /i&h
    %e on &ha& poin&.
    A4 I also aske$ a.o+& &he r+les per&ainin" &o iss+in" or no& iss+in" o' a vali$ C9> 'or a "iven re,or$
    'ile$ a& ,o+r&. The response /as &ha& an C9> /as a+&o%a&i,all* iss+e$ an* &i%e a ,lerk s,anne$ or
    pos&e$ a re,or$ in&o &he PA-9< $o,ke&. I ,hallen"e$ &ha& no&ion. I& /o+l$ have &o .e resear,he$ as
    /ell.
    104 I also raise$ &he 0+es&ion re"ar$in" &he $ispla* o' "eneral or$ers o' &he -o+r& online. I& /as
    al/a*s &he sa%e exa,& 70 "eneral or$ers &ha& /ere availa.le on $ispla* 'or p+.li, vie/in" an$
    a,,ess, 'or a& leas& &/o *ears. =o/ever, i& /as o.vio+s &ha& in 'a,&, &he &o&al n+%.er o' "eneral
    or$ers o' &he ,o+r& /as %+,h lar"er. @s B+llo,k /as no& ,lear on &ha& iss+e. =o/ever, in response &o
    %* re0+es& she pro%ise$ &o provi$e %e a prin&o+& o' &he in$ex o' s&an$in" or$ers ,overin" &he perio$
    'ro% 6001!600A. )he s&a&e$ &ha& s+,h perio$ /o+l$ ,over all "eneral or$ers per&ainin" &o ele,&roni,
    'ilin" a& &he -ali'ornia -en&ral Dis&ri,&.
    114 In "eneral, al&ho+"h I /as no& an a&&orne*, no& even .* a lon" sho&, I .elieve$ &ha& &he iss+es
    $is,+sse$ a.ove ha$ &o .e 'o+n$e$ in ei&her &he >e$eral <+les o' -ivil Pro,e$+re, or in <+les o'
    -o+r&, .+& no& in Beneral Or$ers, le& alone :+no''i,ial %an+al; o' -@39->. I &here'ore also re0+es&e$
    ,lari'i,a&ion re"ar$in" &he le"al 'o+n$a&ion 'or an* o' &he spe,i'i, r+les o' &he opera&ion o' ele,&roni,
    'ilin", as pra,&i,e$ in &he -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia. @s B+llo,k &ol$ %e &ha& I ,o+l$ expe,& a /ri&&en
    response soon a'&er &he .e"innin" o' &he ne/ *ears, an$ I a% /ri&in" &o repea& %* re0+es& 'or s+,h
    /ri&&en response on &he %a&&ers lis&e$ a.ove.
    1es#onses on t,ese Iuestions! to t,e degree t,at any +ere received! are co#ied belo+3
    -anuar #1' %A#A - 1e#eat com#laint and reIuest for res#onses by 9erry =afisi! )ler of t,e 2S District )ourt!
    )entral District of )alifornia! +ere emailed! in reG Fine v Sheriff :-G8*-cv-81*14)3
    9,e email to )ler of t,e )ourt 9erry =afisi saysG B
    cc(cvii
    C
    I& has also .een over hal' a *ear &ha& I have .een $enie$ a,,ess &o ,o+r& re,or$s in >ine v )heri''
    2680A!,v!01A144 a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Fos An"eles, D1E /i&h no explana&ion a& all, an$ sin,e I 'ile$
    a ,o%plain& alle"in" $ishones& %anip+la&ion o' &he re,or$s in &he sa%e ,ap&ion a& &he O''i,e o' &he
    -herko' &he -o+r&. D4E
    I& has .een a ,o+ple o' %on&hs sin,e I re0+es&e$ *o+r responses on rela&e$ 0+es&ions. I a"ain /ri&e
    &o re0+es& an explana&ion 'or &he $enial o' a,,ess &o ,o+r& re,or$s a& &he (ni&e$ )&a&es -o+r&, Fos
    An"eles, 'or responses on %* ,o%plain& an$ &he 0+es&ions, /hi,h *o+r o''i,e las& in$i,a&e$ /ere
    .ein" resear,he$. The %a&&er involve$ &he alle"e$ a.+ses an$ $epriva&ion o' Fi.er&* o' <i,har$ >ine.
    T+es&ions a$$resse$ &o *o+r o''i,e in,l+$e$, .+& /ere no& li%i&e$ &o &he 'ollo/in"8
    14 #as &he PA-9< $o,ke& o' #ine v Sheriff 2680A!,v!01A144 hel$ .* &he o''i,e o' &he -lerk o' &he
    -o+r& as an hones&, vali$ an$ e''e,&+al ,o+r& re,or$ o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o'
    -ali'ornia, in ,o%plian,e /i&h () la/X
    64 #ha& /as &he le"al 'o+n$a&ion 'or &he opera&ion o' PA-9< an$ -@39-> a& &he () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&,-en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'orniaX
    34 #h* /as &he Beneral Or$er 0I!06, /hi,h I /as in'or%e$ .* s&a'' o' *o+r o''i,e /as &he 'o+n$a&ion
    'or &he opera&ions o' PA-9< an$ -@39-> a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia
    +nsi"ne$, no& even %en&ionin" &he na%e o' i&s a+&horXD6E
    44 #h* /ere pro,e$+res 'or a+&hen&i,a&ion an$ ,er&i'i,a&ion o' ,o+r& re,or$s, /hi,h /ere $ras&i,all*
    ,han"e$ /i&h &he in&ro$+,&ion o' PA-9< an$ -@39->, never p+.lishe$ as Fo,al <+les o' -o+r&,as
    re0+ire$ .* la/X
    74 #h* /as p+.li, a,,ess $enie$ &o &he paper re,or$ /hi,h /as &he =a.eas -orp+s pe&i&ion o'
    <i,har$ >ine #ine v Sheriff 2680A!,v!01A144 in $isre"ar$ o' >irs& A%en$%en& ri"h&sX
    ?4 #h* /as p+.li, a,,ess $enie$ &o &he C9>s 2no&i,es o' ele,&roni, 'ilin"s4 in #ine v Sheriff 2680A!,v!
    01A144 in $isre"ar$ o' >irs& A%en$%en& ri"h&sX
    74 #h* /as no hones&, vali$ an$ e''e,&+al C9> ever iss+e$ 'or an* o' &he %in+&es, or$ers, j+$"%en&
    in #ine v Sheriff 2680A!,v!01A144X
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    126/163 TOC:2
    I4 #as Donna Tho%as a+&horize$ as Dep+&* -lerk a& &he &i%e &ha& she en"a"e$ in &ransa,&ions in
    &he $o,ke& o' #ine v Sheriff 2680A!,v!01A144X
    Ho+r o''i,e las& in$i,a&e$ &ha& s+,h 0+es&ions /ere .ein" resear,he$. D3E
    In a$$i&ion, a ,o%plain& /as 'ile$ A+"+s& 1, 600A /i&h *o+r o''i,e, re"ar$in" alle"e$ $is hones&
    %anip+la&ions o' &he paper re,or$ &ha& /as &he ha.eas ,orp+s pe&i&ion o' <i,har$ >ine in #ine v
    Sheriff 2680A!,v!01A144. D4E
    )+,h ,on,erns /ere se,on$e$ .* &he )+pervisor o' &he In&ake (ni&, @s )haron @,Bee. A& leas& &/o
    s&a'' %e%.ers o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Fos An"eles /ere alle"e$ as involve$ in s+,h ,on$+,&, or
    /orse8
    a4 Pro )e -lerk -hris )a/*er
    .4 -o+r&roo% Assis&an& Donna Tho%as.
    <e'+sal o' &he -lerk o' &he -o+r& &o ans/er on an* o' &hese 0+es&ions appeare$ &o a la* person as
    no&hin" %ore &han K&akin" &he >i'&hK, in a ,ase &ha& appeare$ 'or all pra,&i,al p+rposes a 'ra+$ an$
    a.+ses .* &he (ni&e$ )&a&es -o+r& on @r <i,har$ >ine, $eli.era&el* in&en$e$ &o $eprive hi% o'
    Fi.er&*.
    -anuar #4' %A#A - 1e#eat reIuest +as emailed to )ler of t,e )ourt 9erry =afisi for res#onse
    on t,e January 4! -818 reIuest for clarifications regarding docets integrity3
    9,e email note says in #artG B
    cc(cviii
    C
    The () Dis&ri,& -o+r& /o+l$ no& ,er&i'* i&s $o,ke&s. @oreover, no s&a&e%en&s appear in &he $o,ke&s in
    &he na%e o' &he -lerk or an* -lerk Dep+&*, as s+,h. There'ore re0+es&s /ere %a$e, an$ re0+es&s
    are %a$e herein, 'or s&a&e%en&s .* &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, FA ! Terr* Ca'isi, /he&her &he $o,ke&s in
    Zernik v onnor et al 2680I!,v!017704 an$ #ine v Sheriff 2680A!,v!01A144 /ere hones&, vali$, an$
    e''e,&+al $o,ke&s, in ,o%plian,e /i&h () la/. Please a,,ep& &his re0+es& also as -+s&o$ian o'
    <e,or$s o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, FA, p+rs+an& &o -ali'ornia Fa/, as a re0+es& 'or ,+s&o$ian o'
    re,or$s $e,lara&ion re"ar$in" &he PA-9< $o,ke&s o' Zernik v onnor et al 2680I!,v!017704 an$ #ine
    v Sheriff 2680A!,v!01A144.
    =o res#onse +as ever received on t,is reIuest3
    -anuar #;' %A#A - De#uty )ler and 1ecord Su#ervisor in t,e ;ffice of t,e )ler! Da+n >ulloc +rote! in
    res#onse on reIuest to clarify! +,et,er t,e docets in Fine v Sheriff of LA County and %erni& v Connor et al)
    ,onest! valid! and effectual docets! in com#liance +it, 2S la+G B
    cc(ci(
    C
    I a% s&ill resear,hin" *o+r re0+es&. I /ill sen$ *o+ a le&&er /hen I have &he ans/er.
    =o res#onse on t,is Iuestion +as ever received3
    .ebruar #;' %A#A - Detter from &)ourt )ounsel& Dydia ?urtc,u! B
    ccc
    C #ur#orted to notice t,e
    investigation into t,e allegations of adulteration of 7ineEs Aabeas )or#us commencing record3 ;f
    noteG
    - &)ourt )ounsel& is =;9 a court officer defined by la+! and ,as no aut,ority as suc,3
    - Past e(#erience +it, &)ourt )ounsels& of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt B
    ccci
    C and of t,e Su#erior )ourt
    of )alifornia! )ounty of Dos %ngeles s,o+s t,at suc, #ersons are often em#loyed by t,e courts
    to act +it, no aut,ority and deceive #ersons! coming before t,e courts3
    - 9,e 7ebruary 1*! -818 letter failed to s#ecify by +,ose aut,ority t,e &)ourt )ounsel& +as
    +riting3
    - 9,e 7ebruary 1*! -818 +as re#lete +it, errors! ty#ical of dece#tive letters3 :see for com#arison
    letters of 5r )arri"osa on be,alf of t,e Judicial )ouncil of )alifornia! +,ic, even after a long
    e(c,ange and re#eated reIuests for corrections! could not s#ell out correctly t,e name of t,e
    court file in Fine v Sheriff333 B
    cccii
    C )
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    127/163 TOC:2
    /igure A20 >e.r+ar* 1A, 6010 le&&er 'ro% K-o+r& -o+nselK F*$ia Har,h+k, p+rpor&in" &o ini&ia&e an$ inves&i"a!
    &ion in&o &he alle"a&ions o' 'alsi'i,a&ion o' ,o+r& re,or$s in #ine v Sheriff. 9ven %* na%e /as ,han"e$ 'ro%
    Zernik &o Davis...
    7arch #1' %A#A - Detter to )ler of t,e )ourt 9erry =afisi again ased for e(#lanation regarding
    evidence of adulteration of t,e commencing record in 7ineEs Aabeas )or#us #etition3 B
    ccciii
    C
    7arch #4' %A#A - 1es#onse from 9erry =afisi! )ler of t,e 2S District )ourt! e(#lainedG B
    ccciv
    C
    - 9,e commencing record of 7ineEs #etition +as s,redded immediately after being scanned! and
    t,at t,ere +as no certification of t,e s,redding3
    - $ro se #arties do not receive co#ies of t,e =.7s on a routine basis! t,ey need to reIuest co#ies3
    - 9,e General -rder 8$-8-! +,ic, establis,es electronic filing! and +,ic, +as #ublis,ed +it, no
    name of its aut,or and no signature! +as signed by &ma4ority of t,e 4udges&3 Ao+ever! t,e co#y
    t,at +as attac,ed to t,e res#onse letter +as again missing t,e signatures3
    - 9,e res#onse failed to address t,e evidence of adulteration of 7ineEs Aabeas )or#us
    commencing record3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    128/163 TOC:2
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    129/163 TOC:2
    /igure A=0 @ar,h 1?, 6010 <esponse .* -lerk o' &he -o+r& Terr* Ca'isi, () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, on re0+es& 'or inves&i"a&ion, re"ar$in" invali$ ,o+r& re,or$s, a$+l&era&ion
    o' ,o+r& re,or$s, an$ $enial o' a,,ess &o ,o+r& re,or$s.
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    130/163 TOC:2
    7arch %0' %A#A - %not,er attem#t +as made to access court records in %erni& v Connor and
    Fine v Sheriff t,roug, a visit to t,e ;ffice of t,e )ler.
    %ccess +as denied3
    Ao+ever! access +as gained to General -rder 18-81! +,ic, +as missing from t,e collection of
    @eneral ;rders! #ublis,ed online by t,e )ourt3 B
    cccv
    !
    cccvi
    C
    9,e discovery of General -rder 18-81 #rovided ey evidence! +,ic, led to emailing t,e staff of
    t,e office of ),ief Judge %udrey )ollins! )entral District of )alifornia! &=otice to 1eliably
    'nform t,e ),ief Judge! %udrey )ollins! and a 1eIuest for 'nitiation of )orrective %ctions &3
    7arch %1' %A#A - %n email to )ler of t,e )ourt 9erry =afisi! addressed ,er 5arc, 16! -818
    res#onse! regarding clerEs #roceduresG B
    cccvii
    C
    Thank *o+ 'or *o+r @ar,h 1?, 6010 response, D1E /hi,h ,lari'ie$ &he ,+rren& pra,&i,es rela&ive &o
    Beneral Or$ers an$ C9>s a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia. #hereas *o+r le&&er
    a$$resse$ so%e o' %* 0+es&ions, 'ile$ /i&h *o+r o''i,e s&ar&in" A+"+s& 600A, D6ED3ED4E i& s&ill le'& so%e
    ke* 0+es&ions +nans/ere$8
    14 In "eneral, /ha& /as &he le"al 'o+n$a&ion 'or $enial o' p+.li, a,,ess &o &he C9>s 2Co&i,es o'
    9le,&roni, >ilin"s4, /hi,h a,,or$in" &o &he Beneral Or$er 0I!06, in,orpora&e$ as par& o' *o+r @ar,h
    1?,6010 response, &o$a* serve$ as .o&h &he a+&hen&i,a&ion an$ ,er&i'i,a&ion o' ,o+r& re,or$sX
    64 In par&i,+lar, /h* /as I $enie$ a,,ess &o &he C9>s in &he ha.eas ,orp+s o' <i,har$ >ine8<i,har$ I
    >ine v )heri'' o' Fos An"eles -o+n&*
    2680A!,v!01A144X
    34 #as Donna Tho%as a+&horize$ as Dep+&* -lerk /hen she exe,+&e$ &ransa,&ions in &he $o,ke& o'
    &he ha.eas ,orp+s o' <i,har$ >ine8
    <i,har$ I >ine v )heri'' o' Fos An"eles -o+n&* 2680A!,v!01A144X
    44 #as &he $o,ke& o' <i,har$ I >ine v )heri'' o' Fos An"eles -o+n&*
    2680A!,v!01A144 an hones&, vali$ an$ e''e,&+al $o,ke& o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o'
    -ali'ornia, in ,o%plian,e /i&h &he la/s o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&esX
    74 #ha& /as &he reason &ha& %in+&es, or$ers, an$ j+$"%en&s, /hi,h /ere lis&e$ in $o,ke&s o' &he
    -o+r& as Ken&ere$K, /ere serve$ /i&h C9>s, /hi,h /ere %issin" &he <)A!en,r*p&e$ $i"i&al
    si"na&+res, /hi,h /ere $e'ine$ in Beneral Or$er 0I!06 as &he "overnin" si"na&+re, servin" as
    veri'i,a&ion o' s+,h C9>sX
    ?4 #ere ,o%plain&s, alle"in" &a%perin" /i&h &he re,or$s o' &he ha.eas ,orp+s pe&i&ion o' <i,har$
    >ine, <i,har$ I >ine v )heri'' o' Fos An"eles -o+n&* 2680A!,v!01A144, a& &he O''i,e o' &he -lerk,
    /hi,h ha$ .een 'ile$ /i&h *o+r o''i,e, ever revie/e$ .* *o+r o''i,eX
    The 'avor o' expe$ien& responses on &he 0+es&ions a.ove /o+l$ .e "rea&l* appre,ia&e$. )+,h
    0+es&ions per&aine$ &o &he in&e"ri&* o' ,o+r& re,or$s a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o'
    -ali'ornia, in "eneral, an$ &o &he Fi.er&* o' a person in &he %a&&er a& han$, in par&i,+lar.
    7arch %5' %A#A - ' sent to t,e office of ),ief Judge %udrey )ollins! 2S District )ourt! )entral
    District of )alifornia! &=otice to 1eliably 'nform t,e ),ief Judge! %udrey )ollins! and a
    1eIuest for 'nitiation of )orrective %ctions &3 >y t,at time! ' +as met,odically revie+ing court
    cases in 2S courts across t,e 2nited States! and in #articular in )alifornia3 5y em#,asis +as on
    ,abeas cor#us #etitions! on t,e one ,and! and on cases involving financial institutions! on t,e
    ot,er3 %fter one becomes familiar +it, t,e met,ods of #erverting t,e records! it becomes easy to
    conduct mec,anical searc,es! and identify cases! +,ere t,e 4udges are #erverting t,e litigation!
    +it,out even reading t,e legal content of t,e #a#ers3 9,e notice #ertained to t,e case of 7ames (
    Geener v "SBC 'ortgage Services Inc et al :-G8*- cv-86*56)! +,ere t,e evidence suggested t,at
    Judge )ollins ,erself +as involved in t,e 7raud on t,e )ourt3 B
    cccviii
    C
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    131/163 TOC:2
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    132/163 TOC:2
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    133/163 TOC:2
    /igure A40 @ar,h 67, 6010 e%ail &o &he o''i,e o' A+$re* -ollins, -hie' J+$"e, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis!
    &ri,& o' -ali'ornia.
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    134/163 TOC:2
    Earl A$ril %A#A - ' received a #,one call from De#uty 2S 5ars,al Darcy Smit,! asing me to
    come for an &intervie+&3 9,e &intervie+&! lie &)ourt )ounsel& ?arc,uEs letter! +as again
    re#resented as #art of an ,onest attem#t to investigate my claims of adulteration of 7ineEs Aabeas
    )or#us #etition records3
    ' res#onded t,at ' did not give la+ enforcement &intervie+s&! and ased for a +ritten invitation3
    A$ril 5' %A#A - ' received an email note from t,e same De#uty 2S 5ars,al Darcy Smit,3
    At 02:0= P> 4JAJ20106 ?e#ut* >arhal Smith 4r!te:
    @r. Zernik,I /o+l$ ver* %+,h like &o ,on$+,& an in&ervie/ /i&h *o+ re"ar$in" *o+r e%ails &o -hie' ()
    Dis&ri,& -o+r& J+$"e A+$re* -ollins, please ,on&a,& %e a& *o+r earlies& ,onvenien,e.
    Dep+&* Dar,* @ )%i&h
    Dis&ri,& Threa& Inves&i"a&or
    () @arshal )ervi,e Fos An"eles, -A
    613!4A4!0377
    ;nly t,en it became a##arent t,at De#uty 5ars,al Darcy Smit, +as #art of t,e &District 9,reat
    2nit&3 't at least raised t,e concern t,at ' +as by t,en targeted as a &t,reat& to t,e 2S District
    )ourt3
    'n res#onse ' ased De#uty 5ars,all Smit, to e(#lain t,e legal foundation for suc, &intervie+&3
    5y concern +as t,at ' +ould never emerge from t,at &intervie+& a free man3
    De#uty 5ars,al Smit, never res#onded on my reIuest for an e(#lanation3
    A$ril %1' %A#A - ' +as out all nig,t3 H,en ' returned ,ome Sunday morning! my neig,bors
    informed me t,at on Saturday nig,t armed federal agents +ere looing for me and looed eager
    to s,oot3 9,e neig,bors urged me to turn myself in! since t,ey +ere concerned t,at if t,e federal
    agents return and start s,ooting! t,ey may be in ,armEs +ay3
    ' entered my a#artment! too #ass#orts and cas, :+,ic, ' ,ad ready for mont,s)! +ent to t,e
    air#ort! and too a flig,t out of t,e 2nited States3 ' left t,e 2S +it, t,e clot,s on me and my
    com#uter! not,ing else3
    9,e last email communication ' received from De#uty 5ars,al Smit, stated! &7ool me once333
    etc&3
    %lt,oug, ' lost most my #ro#erty and most of my lifeEs savings! as +ell as my business in t,e
    #rocess! ' consider myself lucy! ,aving emerged live and free from t,e 2nited States3
    += <;:H 2 Further retaliation in Israel folloing the U$*2Israel su+mission
    9aing of my savings by >an AaPoalim under #atronage of State aut,orities
    'n January -813! my remaining savings :most ,ad been unla+fully taen in t,e 2nited States)! t,en
    de#osited in t,e largest ban in 'srael - >an AaPoalim - +ere unla+fully taen by t,e ban3 9,e
    ban claimed t,at t,e funds +ere taen in com#liance +it, 2S la+ :7%9)%)3 >ut 7%9)% +as not
    in effect at t,at time in t,e 2S! and surely not in t,e State of 'srael3 9,e taing of t,e funds included
    no #rior legal #rocedure! eit,er in t,e 2S or in 'srael3
    Suc, actions are similar to t,e unla+ful actions taen by 2S bans against %ssange and Hiileas
    in late -8183 B
    ccci(
    C
    >an of 'srael! 'sraelEs central ban and baning regulator! t,en ,eaded by Stanley 7isc,er :today!
    =o - in t,e 2S 7ederal 1eserve)! refused to duly register my )onsumerEs )om#laint against >an
    AaPoalim in t,is matter! as documented in a letter from Stanley 7isc,erEs o+n office3 B
    ccc(
    C
    9,e January -7! -813 letter from @overnor of >an of 'srael >ureau Stanley 7isc,er in #art saysG
    <e"ar$less o' &he 'a,& &ha& i& is a () la/,&he Israeli .ankin" s*s&e%, like &he .ankin" s*s&e%s in
    %an* o&her na&ions, is "earin" i&sel' &o a,&, p+rs+an& &o &he $e%an$s o' &he () @inis&r* o' &he
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    135/163 TOC:2
    Treas+r* an$ &ax a+&hori&ies, in or$er &o avoi$ san,&ions .* s+,h .o$ies, in,l+$in" /i&hhol$in" 'ro%
    pa*%en&s, &rans'erre$ 'ro% &he () &o Israel, re"ar$less o' &he in$ivi$+al ,lien&s .
    ...
    #e +n$ers&an$ &ha& ,lari'i,a&ions in &he spiri& o' &his le&&er have alrea$* .een provi$e$ &o *o+ .* D&he
    Israeli!jzE Bank =aPoali%, B@, on Cove%.er 4, 6016.
    #i&h all o+r s*%pa&h* 'or &he in,onvenien,e an$ &ro+.le, ,a+se$ &o &he ,+s&o%ers .* &he >AT-A
    ins&r+,&ions, /e re"re&'+ll* ,anno& help *o+ .e*on$ provi$in" ,lari'i,a&ions, as $e&aile$ a.ove.
    Has,ington D) %ttorney James Jatras! former 2S State De#artment counsel! o#ined t,at Stanley
    7isc,erEs conduct in t,is case made no sense at all3 B
    ccc(i
    C
    9,e Su#reme )ourt of t,e State of 'srael refused to duly register a Petition to )om#el Stanley
    7isc,er to #erform ,is baning regulation duties in com#liance +it, t,e la+ of t,e State of 'srael3
    9,e #etition +as duly registered only after it +as dismissed3 B
    ccc(ii
    !
    ccc(iii
    C 9,en ),ief )ler of t,e
    'sraeli Su#reme )ourt Sara, Difsc,it" refused to ans+er on a reIuest to e(#lain t,e retroactive
    adulteration of court records in t,is case3
    .ventually! +,en all else ,ad failed! ' filed a 1eIuest for Protection +it, t,e 7ederal @erman
    government! t,roug, t,e 9el %viv )onsulate3 B
    ccc(iv
    C
    Soon after t,at! all funds +ere returned by t,e ban3
    -813 - 7urt,er retaliation follo+ing t,e 2P1 submission
    Dater in -813! civil litigation +as #ur#ortedly commenced against me in t,e Aaifa 5agistrate )ourt3
    Suc, litigation +as clearly simulated litigation and 7raud u#on t,e )ourt and an attem#t to
    intimidate and retaliateG
    9,e litigation started +it, no summonsM
    9,e com#laint listed no la+ of t,e State of 'srael as t,e basis for t,e com#laintM
    %ttorney! +,o filed t,e com#laint! failed to file certificate of )ounsel of 1ecord for t,e
    #ur#orted #laintiffsM
    )ourt orders +ere served unsigned by a 4udge! and +it, no aut,entication by t,e cler of t,e
    courtM
    9,e litigation +as to be conducted be,ind closed doors! and ' +as re#eatedly +arned in
    #ur#orted &orders& by t,e 4udge! against s,o+ing any of t,e records to any ot,er #erson! and
    %ccess to court records +as denied to t,e #ur#orted Defendant in ,is o+n case3
    ' refused to a##ear in suc, court3
    %ttem#ts to gain .Iual Protection under t,e Da+ against suc, abuse! by #etitioning to t,e 'sraeli
    Su#reme )ourt again failed - t,e Su#reme )ourt #ur#ortedly denied t,e #etition! but refused to
    serve a signed and certified record of t,e decision3 B
    ccc(v
    !
    ccc(vi
    C
    .ventually! ' again filed a 1eIuest for Protection +it, t,e @erman )onsul in 9el %viv! and t,e
    litigation file +as &closed&3 B
    ccc(vii
    C
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    136/163 TOC:2
    H! Historical $ers$ective ( Robber "aron Revival Era!
    /igure A20 K-orpora&e Personhoo$K is one o' &he ,on,ep&s &ha& en,aps+la&es &he &rans'or%a&ion o' &he ()
    re"i%e, or"anize$ s&a&e!,orpora&e ,ri%e, an$ &he role o' ,o+r& ,orr+p&ion in s+,h &rans'or%a&ion 2see also
    se,&ions -6o,p4. I& also poin&s o+& &he vas& si%ilari&* .e&/een &he ,+rren& era an$ &he <o..er Baron 9ra in
    &he (), 'ollo/in" &he -ivil #ar an$ lea$in" in&o &he Brea& Depression.
    )onditions! +,ic, ,ave been establis,ed in t,e 2nited States over t,e #ast cou#le of decades
    resemble conditions! +,ic, #revailed in t,e 2nited States over a century ago! during t,e &1obber
    >aron .ra&! B
    ccc(viii
    C from t,e end of t,e )ivil Har and into t,e beginning of t,e -8t, century and
    t,e @reat De#ression3
    9,e #eriod +as c,aracteri"ed by t,e buildu# of e(treme +ealt, by a fe+! and t,e im#overis,ment of
    t,e many3 9,e ne+ 1obber >arons +ere t,e o+ners of railroad and baning cor#orations3 Dabor of
    men! +omen! and c,ildren +as e(#loited in an e(treme fas,ion! and labor dis#utes +ere su##ressed
    t,roug, murderous violence3 'nde#endent farmers +ere im#overis,ed! strangled by ,ig, interest
    debt to t,e bans! leading to consolidation of farmland by t,e ric,3
    >ans and railroad cor#orations acted as unregulated trusts or mono#olies and engaged in fraud in
    financial institutions and t,e stoc marets3 %s a result! t,e 2S economy +as #lagued by a series of
    financial #anics and economic c,aos +it, millions of %mericans losing 4obs! farmers being forced
    off t,eir land! and railroads! bans! and ot,er businesses going under3
    )orru#tion of local! state! and federal government +as ram#ant3 9,e #residency! regardless of #arty
    affiliation! became subservient to t,e business magnets3
    =otably! t,e #eriod +as also c,aracteri"ed by +ides#read corru#tion of t,e courts! and corru#tion of
    t,e offices of t,e clers of t,e 2S courts +as notorious3 B
    ccc(i(
    C 9,e 1obber >arons +ere effectively
    #laced above t,e la+3 )onduct of t,e 2S courts +as described in t,e 2S )ongress as &a burlesIue
    and a s,am &3
    9,e Su#reme )ourt +as conducive to increasing t,e #o+er of t,e mono#olies! undermining t,eir
    regulation by eit,er federal or state governments3 >y 1$$6 t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt issued t,e
    dubious decision record in Santa Clara County v. Southern $acific *ailroad N 11$ 23S3 3*4 :1$$6)!
    +,ic, led to &)or#orate Person,ood&3 9,is decision s,ould be considered an early e(am#le of a
    simulated Su#reme )ourt record3 9,e #art #ertaining to &)or#orate Person,ood& +as not #art of
    t,e decision by t,e 4ustices itself! but a ,eadnote by a court re#orter3
    &)or#orate Person,ood& and #ractices of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt made cor#orations by far t,e
    #rimary beneficiary of t,e &Due Process& 14t, %mendment! +,ic, +as originally enacted to #rotect
    t,e rig,ts of t,e freed slaves3
    %ccording to a ,istorical study by 7ederal Judicial )enter! t,e Salary Act :1*1*)! :Statutes at Darge
    48! 1*1*G 11$-) +as central to reform of t,e 2S courts3 9,e %ct #laced t,e clers of t,e 2S courts
    under t,e direct aut,ority of t,e 2S %ttorney @eneral3 %not,er ey to t,e reform +as t,e
    a##ointment of Su#reme )ourt 4ustices t,at favored t,e restriction of cor#orate #o+er! suc, as
    >en4amin )ardo"o! no+n for &#iercing t,e veil of cor#orate structures&! and Douis >randeis! +,o
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    137/163 TOC:2
    +as a #ro#onent of baning regulation! no+n for ,is boo &;t,er Peo#leEs 5oney&3 %nd yet!
    #assage of ma4or reforms as #art of 1ooseveltEs =e+ Deal +as bloced by t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt!
    until t,e Su#reme )ourt +as directly faced +it, t,e &)ourt Pacing& t,reat3
    Dater in -8t, century! t,e #rovisions of t,e Salary Act +ere reversed! and t,e clers of t,e 2S courts
    +ere again #laced under aut,ority of t,e 2S 4udiciary3
    %s documented in instant submission! corru#tion of t,e offices of t,e clers of t,e 2S courts and
    t,e resulting corru#tion of court records is again a ,allmar of t,e 2S courts today3
    'n 1*** t,e Glass2Steagall Act :1*33)! enacted in t,e +ae of t,e @reat De#ression as t,e
    cornerstone of financial institutions regulation! +as re#ealed under ,eavy lobbying by financial
    institutions3 B
    ccc((
    C 9,e re#eal of Glass Steagall is #erceived among t,e ma4or direct causes of t,e
    current financial crisis3 B
    ccc((i
    C
    9oday! &)or#orate Person,ood& is again central to t,e transformation of t,e 2S regime3 9,e -818
    )iti"ens 2nited decision of t,e Su#reme )ourt! based on &)or#orate Person,ood& and cor#orate
    7irst %mendment 7ree S#eec, rig,ts! undermined cam#aign finance regulation! and created
    un#recedented #o+er for cor#orations over #oliticians and #olitics in t,e 2nited States3 B
    ccc((ii
    C
    %s s,o+n in instant submission! t,e Citi,ens United v F(C case is mared by simulated court
    records! lie t,e Santa Clara *ailroad case of 1$$63 %nd in t,e recent "o++y Lo++y decision! a
    furt,er e(tension of Citi,ens United! cor#orations +ere granted 7irst %mendment 7reedom of
    1eligion rig,ts3
    &)or#orate Person,ood& is also t,e focus of current reform efforts in t,e 2nited States3 7or
    e(am#le! t,e -81- ;ccu#y5arines Press 1elease summari"ed t,e grou#Es goalsG
    a) 1e#ealing of t,e =D%%!
    b) ;verturning of )iti"ens 2nited!
    and c) .(#osing and indicting t,e 1V3 B
    ccc((iii
    C
    ;verturning )iti"ens 2nited is alos t,e single cause of t,e &5ove to %mend& grass-root movement3
    B
    ccc((iv
    C
    9,e ,istory of reform of 2S cor#orate corru#tion and court corru#tion in t,e first ,alf of t,e -8t,
    century demonstrates t,e relations,i# bet+een t,e t+o! and t,e magnitude of t,e reIuired efforts3 't
    also #oints out t,at reform of t,e offices of t,e clers of t,e 2S courts is a necessary first ste#3
    *! Conclusions
    9,e findings of instant submission ,old serious im#lications relative to t,e current socio-economic
    crisis in t,e 2nited States! to baning regulation! and Auman 1ig,ts of all residents of t,e 2nited
    States3 5oreover! due to t,e dominant global economic #osition of t,e 2S! and its ongoing attem#ts
    to dominate t,e global baning and financial systems! #articularly t,roug, t,e 2S court system!
    B
    ccc((v
    !
    ccc((vi
    C t,e findings also ,ave serious im#lication for socio-economic develo#ment +orld-+ide3
    Die+ise! t,e findings ,ave serious im#lications! relative to t,e #osition of t,e 2S in various
    international dis#utes and conflicts3
    13 9,roug, t,e im#lementation and o#eration of invalid! fraudulent '9 systems! t,e 2S courts today
    routinely conduct of simulated litigation! unla+fully de#rive t,e liberty and #ro#erty of
    individuals! and #lace t,e bans above t,e la+3 Suc, conduct amounts to ;rgani"ed State-
    cor#orate )rime3
    -3 Suc, conduct amounts to serious violation of fundamental Auman 1ig,ts of t,e #eo#le of t,e
    2nited States3
    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    138/163 TOC:2
    33 Suc, conduct is also central to t,e current socio-economic crisis! failing baning regulation! and
    t,e /7oreclosure )risis0! +,ic, resulted in vast increase in #overty and ,omelessness in t,e
    2nited States and undermined t,e 2S middle-class3
    43 9,e validity of any legal and 4udicial records! originating in t,e 2nited States! and t,e validity
    of any litigation in t,e 2S courts s,ould be considered dubious3
    53 9,e international community s,ould reassess t,e nature of t,e current regime in t,e 2nited
    States! and any claim t,at its foreign #olicy is driven by Auman 1ig,ts interests3
    63 .fforts to address conditions! +,ic, are no+ establis,ed in t,e 2nited States! and to restore t,e
    force and effect of t,e 2S )onstitution and 2S la+! are liely be #rotracted and meet star
    resistance by #o+erful 2S security! legal! and financial interest grou#s3 9,erefore! no corrective
    #rocess is liely to be commenced! unless conditions deteriorate! accom#anied by civil unrest3
    -! Recommen&ations
    .merging from t,e current conditions +ould reIuire a fundamental corrective #rocess in t,e 2nited
    States! +,ere as a result of current conditions! t,e #olitical #rocess is underminedG
    13 9,e large-scale fraud in t,e 2S courts! +,ic, in fact im#licates eac, and every 2S sitting
    4udge! +ould liely reIuire an a##roac, similar to a 9rut, and 1econciliation )ommission!
    and6or a Second )onstitutional )onvention3
    -3 Due to t,e central role of t,e %dministrative ;ffice of t,e 2S )ourts in im#lementing t,e
    fraudulent '9 systems of t,e 2S courts! t,e ;ffice s,ould be restructured or closed3
    33 5easures! similar to t,ose taen under similar circumstances a century ago t,roug, t,e Salary
    Act :1*1*)! +,ic, #laced t,e clers of t,e 2S courts under t,e direct aut,ority of t,e %ttorney
    @eneral! s,ould be considered3
    43 2S legal and com#uting e(#erts s,ould be engaged in an initiative to restore t,e integrity of t,e
    '9 systems of t,e 2S courts! under accountability to t,e 2S )ongress! +it, t,e goal of maing
    suc, system as trans#arent as #ossible to t,e #ublic at large3
    53 'n nations! +,ere t,e se#aration of branc,es of government is establis,ed by la+! t,e courts
    must not be #ermitted to develo# and im#lement t,e courtsE '9 systems3
    63 Auman 1ig,ts and internet activists must ee# a +atc,ful eye on t,e validity and integrity of
    '9 systems of t,e courts and #risons
    %ugust 31! -814
    Jose#, Ferni! P,D
    Human Rights Alert (NGO)
    =! References

    =+%an <i"h& Aler& 2CBO48 (P< )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 260144 ! Appen$ix I
    &arge-'ale (rau" in %) *tem !( the US '!urt - Unann!un'e" regime 'hange+
    139/163 TOC:2
    i
    =+%an <i"h&s Aler& 2CBO4 s+.%ission &o &he (ni&e$ Ca&ions =+%an <i"h&s -o+n,il 'or &he (P< o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es
    260104, as i& appears in &he (ni&e$ Ca&ions =+%an <i"h&s -o+n,il si&e
    =TTP833li..oh,hr.or"3=<Bo$ies3(P<3Do,+%en&s3sessionA3()3=<Aler&W(P<W()AW)0AW6010W=+%anU60ri"h&s
    U60aler&1.pp$'
    =+%an <i"h&s Aler& 2CBO4 Appen$ix I &o s+.%ission 'or &he (P< o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es .* &he (ni&e$ Ca&ions =+%an
    <i"h&s -o+n,il
    h&&p833li..oh,hr.or"3=<Bo$ies3(P<3Do,+%en&s3sessionA3()3=<Aler&W(P<W()AW)0AW6010W=+%anU60ri"h&s
    U60aler&1.p$'
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36A7?43743
    (ni&e$ Ca&ions =+%an <i"h&s -o+n,il Pro'essional )&a'' <epor&, re'errin" &o =+%an <i"h&s Aler& s+.%ission /i&h &he
    no&e K,orr+p&ion o' &he ,o+r&s an$ &he le"al pro'ession an$ $is,ri%ina&ion .* la/ en'or,e%en& in -ali'orniaK 2pa"e ?,
    para"raph 474
    h&&p833$a,,ess!$$s!n*.+n.or"3$o,3(CDO-3B9C3B1031?A3?73PD>3B101?A?7.p$'XOpen9le%en&
    ii
    Zernik, J8 Be*on$ vo&in" %a,hines ! ,ase %ana"e%en& s*s&e%s o' &he ,o+r&s ! )+s&ain an$ &he Fos An"eles )+perior
    -o+r& Par& I
    h&&p833es.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,31104777473
    Zernik, J8 Be*on$ ele,&roni, vo&in" %a,hines ! 'ra+$ in ,ase %ana"e%en& s*s&e%s o' &he ,o+r&s ! )+s&ain an$ &he Fos
    An"eles )+perior -o+r& ! Par& II
    h&&p833es.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,31104770A73
    Zernik, J8 Be*on$ vo&in" %a,hines ! ,ase %ana"e%en& s*s&e%s o' &he ,o+r&s ! )+s&ain ! -@) o' &he Fos An"eles
    )+perior -o+r& ! A.s&ra,& an$ >i"+res s
    h&&p833es.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3301?6II03
    Zernik, J8 -o%p+&ers S &he -o+r&s ! )+s&ain ! -@) o' &he Fos An"eles )+perior -o+r& ! <e"is&ers o' A,&ion
    h&&p833es.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3301?64?13
    iii
    Zernik, J8 Da&a @inin" as a -ivi, D+&* R Online P+.li, PrisonersM <e"is&ra&ion )*s&e%s,
    $nternational -ournal on Social "edia' "onitoring! "easurement! "ining 18 I4!A? 260104
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,33I36I7A13
    iv
    =+%an <i"h&s Aler& 2CBO4 s+.%ission &o &he (ni&e$ Ca&ions =+%an <i"h&s -o+n,il 'or &he (P< o' &he )&a&e o' Israel
    260134, as i& appears in &he (ni&e$ Ca&ions =+%an <i"h&s -o+n,il si&e8
    The =+%an <i"h&s Aler& 2CBO4 s+.%ission 260134 'or &he (niversal Perio$i, <evie/ o' israel .* &he (C =+%an <i"h&s
    -o+n,il, as i& appears on &he (C /e. si&e
    h&&p833li..oh,hr.or"3=<Bo$ies3(P<3Do,+%en&s3)ession173IF3=<AW(P<WI)<W)17W6016W=+%an<i"h&sAler&W9.p$'
    6013!01!01 The =+%an <i"h&s Aler& 2CBO4 s+.%ission, as in,orpora&e$ in&o &he (C =+%an <I&"h&s -o+n,il (P< repror&
    /i&h &he no&e KFa,k o' in&e"ri&* in &he ele,&roni, re,or$s o' &he )+pre%e -o+r&, &he $is&ri,& ,o+r&s an$ &he $e&ainees ,o+r&s
    in IsraelK 2pa"e 4, para"raph 674
    h&&p833$a,,ess!$$s!n*.+n.or"3$o,3(CDO-3B9C3B1631I03163PD>3B161I016.p$'XOpen9le%en&
    6016!07!10 =+%an <i"h& Aler&, Appen$ix I &o )+.%ission5 17&h (P< ! )&a&e o' Israel ! KIn&e"ri&*, or la,k &hereo', o' &he
    ele,&roni, re,or$ s*s&e%s o' &he ,o+r&s o' &he )&a&e o' IsraelK
    h&&ps833$rive."oo"le.,o%3'ile3$30BIAa6xTB.%k7,jCx$6sz[07o@k(3e$i&X+sp\sharin"
    v
    Bio"raphi,al )ke&,h R Joseph Zernik, PhD
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34?4611133
    vi
    #iki Cer$s, K@a,hine Fearnin"K, *oogle (ooks
    h&&p833.ooks."oo"le.,o.il3.ooksX
    i$\4Za*A/AATBAJSa%p5prin&se,\'ron&,overSa%p5so+r,e\".sWa&.Pv\onepa"eSa%p50Sa%p5'\'alse
    vii
    Joseph Zernik. KDesi"n an$ Opera&ion o' &he 9le,&roni, <e,or$ )*s&e%s o' &he () -o+r&s are Finke$ &o >ailin"
    Bankin" <e"+la&ionK Data Analytics, 6016
    h&&p833///.&hink%in$.or"3in$ex.phpXvie/\ar&i,leSar&i,lei$\$a&aWanal*&i,sW6016W3W70W?007A
    viii
    Joseph Zernik, KIn&e"ri&*, or Fa,k Thereo', o' &he 9le,&roni, <e,or$ )*s&e%s o' &he -o+r&s o' &he )&a&e o' IsraelK, Data
    Analytics, 6016
    http://www.thinkmind.org/index.php?view=article&articleid=data_analytics_2012_2_10_00!
    ix
    2012" #n$a&e$, KThe Prison -risisK, A%U
    https://www.acl#.org/$iles/assets/massincarceration_pro%lems.pd$
    x
    6011!03!13 Pa+l Gr+"%an, K Ano&her Insi$e Jo.K, CH Ti%es
    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/0!/1&/opinion/1&kr#gman.html?_r=0
    xi
    6011!16!66 ),o& Pal&ro/, K)pe,ial <epor&8 The /a&,h$o"s &ha& $i$nL& .arkK, <e+&ers
    http://www.re#ters.com/article/2011/12/22/#s'$oreclos#res'id()*+,-./00120111222
    xii
    6011!10!07 Tea Par&* an$ Fi.erals ,onvene a& =F) &o $is,+ss -ons&i&+&ional -onven&ion 2vi$eo4
    h&&p833&o$a*.la/.harvar$.e$+3&ea!par&*!an$!li.erals!,onvene!a&!hls!&o!$is,+ss!,ons&i&+&ional!,onven&ion!vi$eo3
    xiii
    KFa/ren,e Fessi"Ls ,all 'or s&a&e!.ase$ a,&ivis% on .ehal' o' a -ons&i&+&ional -onven&ion ,o+l$ provi$e &he +proo&e$
    %ove%en& /i&h a poli&i,al proje,& 'or /in&erK
    6011!11!17 Alesh =o+$ek, K=as a =arvar$ Pro'essor @appe$ O+& &he Cex& )&ep 'or O,,+p* #all )&ree&XK. ?he Atlantic
    h&&p833///.&hea&lan&i,.,o%3poli&i,s3ar,hive360113113has!a!harvar$!pro'essor!%appe$!o+&!&he!nex&!s&ep!'or!o,,+p*!/all!
    s&ree&36477?13
    xiv
    6013!07!1A Al.er&o <iva, Ji%%* -ar&er8 () :has no '+n,&ionin" $e%o,ra,*;, Salon
    h&&p833///.salon.,o%3601330731I3ji%%*W,ar&erW+sWhasWnoW'+n,&ionin"W$e%o,ra,*Wpar&ner3
    xv
    KIn a spee,h in Beor"e&o/n (niversi&*, )ena&or Feah*, -hair o' &he )ena&e J+$i,iar* -o%%i&&ee ,alle$ 'or a KTr+&h
    an$ <e,on,ilia&ion -o%%issionK on &he () Depar&%en& o' J+s&i,e.
    600A! Trans,rip& o' )ena&or Feah* spee,h
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,33I4766713
    xvi
    6011!0A!00 )overei"n -i&izens ! A Bro/in" Do%es&i, Threa& &o Fa/ 9n'or,e%en&, #B$
    http://www.$%i.gov/stats'services/p#%lications/law'en$orcement'%#lletin/septem%er'2011/sovereign'
    citi2ens
    xvii
    6010! John Gerse*, The >ree%an on &he Fan$ @ove%en&8 Brass <oo&s Fi.er&arianis% in A,&ion, %i(ertarian Alliance
    h&&p833///.li.er&arian.,o.+k3X0\no$e31
    xviii
    #ell <e"+la&e$ A%eri,an @ili&ias
    h&&p833/ra%si&e.,o%3Xx"Wso+r,e\%s"W%esWne&/ork
    xix
    6014!07!10 B+n$* ran,h s&an$o'' ]invi"ora&e$M an&i!"overn%en& "ro+ps, repor& sa*s, Washington Post
    h&&p833///./ashin"&onpos&.,o%3ne/s3pos&!na&ion3/p360143073103.+n$*!ran,h!s&an$o''!invi"ora&e$!an&i!"overn%en&!
    "ro+ps!repor&!sa*s3
    xx
    KI &hink i&Ls $i''i,+l& &o 'in$ a 'ra+$ o' &his size on &he (.). ,o+r& s*s&e% in (.). his&or*,K sai$ <a*%on$ Bres,ia, a visi&in"
    pro'essor a& Hale Fa/ ),hool /ho has /ri&&en ar&i,les anal*zin" &he role o' ,o+r&s in &he 'inan,ial ,risis. KI ,anL& &hink o'
    one /here *o+ have li&erall* &ens o' &ho+san$s o' 'ra+$+len& $o,+%en&s 'ile$ in &ens o' &ho+san$s o' ,ases.K
    6011!16!66 ),o& Pal&ro/, K)pe,ial <epor&8 The /a&,h$o"s &ha& $i$nL& .arkK, Reuters
    h&&p833///.re+&ers.,o%3ar&i,le360113163663+s!'ore,los+res!i$()T<97BF0@-60111666
    xxi
    K...a s*s&e% in /hi,h onl* &he li&&le people have &o o.e* &he la/, /hile &he ri,h, an$ .ankers espe,iall*, ,an ,hea& an$
    $e'ra+$ /i&ho+& ,onse0+en,es.K
    6011!03!13 Pa+l Gr+"%an, KAno&her Insi$e Jo.K, /7?
    h&&p833///.n*&i%es.,o%360113033143opinion314kr+"%an.h&%lXWr\0
    xxii
    K@ore &han 100 la/ pro'essors have si"ne$ on &o a le&&er release$ &o$a* &ha& proposes ,on"ressional hearin"s an$
    le"isla&ion ai%e$ a& 'ashionin" K%an$a&or* an$ en'or,ea.leK e&hi,s r+les 'or )+pre%e -o+r& j+s&i,es 'or &he 'irs& &i%e. The
    e''or&, ,oor$ina&e$ .* &he li.eral Allian,e 'or J+s&i,e, /as &ri""ere$ .* Kre,en& %e$ia repor&s,K &he le&&er sai$, apparen&l*
    re'errin" &o s&ories o' %ee&in"s an$ o&her po&en&ial ,on'li,&s o' in&eres& involvin" J+s&i,es An&onin ),alia an$ -laren,e
    Tho%as a%on" o&hers.K
    6011!06!64 Blo" o' &he Fe"al Ti%es
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34A7I?43?3
    xxiii
    6011!04!07 K>ore,los+re 'ra+$8 The ho%eo/ner ni"h&%ares ,on&in+eK, #ortune
    h&&p833'or&+ne.,o%360113043073'ore,los+re!'ra+$!&he!ho%eo/ner!ni"h&%ares!,on&in+e3
    xxiv
    6016!01!07 Bre&,hen @or"enson, :>ro% 9as& an$ #es&, >ore,los+re =orror )&ories;, Ce/ Hork Ti%es
    h&&p833///.n*&i%es.,o%3601630130I3.+siness3%or&"a"e!servi,in"!horror!s&ories!'air!"a%e.h&%lXpa"e/an&e$\allSWr\0
    xxv
    Zernik, J8 >ra+$ an$ -orr+p&ion in () -o+r&s are Ti"h&l* Finke$ &o Bankin" >ra+$ an$ &he Blo.al 9,ono%i, -risis !
    1?
    &h
    #orl$ -ri%inolo"* -on"ress presen&a&ion260114
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3?13717?63
    xxvi
    600I!07!67 Zernik v -onnor 2680I!,v!017704 a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, Dk& P 0?68 >irs&
    A%en$e$ -o%plain&8
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!0-!3&/
    xxvii
    6011!0I!11 Dave #arner, K>or%er j+$"e sen&en,e$ &o prison 'or Kki$s 'or ,ashK s,he%eK, Reuters
    h&&p833///.re+&ers.,o%3ar&i,le3601130I3113+s!,ri%e!ki$s'or,ash!i$()T<977A?GB60110I11
    xxviii
    600?!10!11 K De&ainee &rea&%en& &opi, o' ,on'eren,eK, )&an'or$ Ce/s
    h&&p833ne/s.s&an'or$.e$+3ne/s3600?3o,&o.er113h+%ani&*!10110?.h&%l
    xxix
    1AA7!16!00 () Depar&%en& o' J+s&i,e, O''i,e o' Inspe,&or Beneral, De,e%.er 1AA7 )pe,ial <epor&8 -IA Dr+"
    Tra''i,kin" &o Fos An"eles, -ali'ornia
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/240-151&
    xxx
    6016!0?!60 K>+ll ,overa"e8 AT>Ls >as& an$ >+rio+s s,an$alK , Fos An"eles Ti%es
    h&&p833///.la&i%es.,o%3na&ion3a&'!'as&!'+rio+s!s"!s&or*"aller*.h&%l
    xxxi
    6013!07!03 -hris&ie )%*&he, K=)B- J+$"e Approves Q1.AB Dr+"!@one* Fa+n$erin" A,,or$ K, Bloom(erg
    http://www.%loom%erg.com/news/201!'0-'02/hs%c'6#dge'approves'1'4%'dr#g'money'la#ndering'
    accord.html
    xxxii
    6013!0?!60 To% Bli,k%an, KDe'i,ien,ies in 'inan,ial oversi"h& ena.le %one* la+n$erin"K, ?ransnational
    $nstitute
    h&&p833///.&ni.or"3ar&i,le3$e'i,ien,ies!'inan,ial!oversi"h&!ena.le!%one*!la+n$erin"
    xxxiii
    6011!11!67 KIn&erna&ional .anks have ai$e$ @exi,an $r+" "an"sK, %os Angeles ?imes
    http://articles.latimes.com/2011/nov/2-/world/la'$g'mexico'money'la#ndering'%anks'20111125
    xxxiv
    KOr"anize$ -ri%eK, U/ 3ffice on Drug and rime
    h&&ps833///.+no$,.or"3+no$,3en3or"anize$!,ri%e3in$ex.h&%l
    xxxv
    6010!0?!67, Joseph Zernik, KA+&o%a&e$ In$ex o' () J+$i,ial -orr+p&ion Propose$ .* =+%an <i"h&s Aler& 2CBO4K,
    )2aminer0 com
    h&&p833///.exa%iner.,o%3ar&i,le3a+&o%a&e$!in$ex!o'!+s!j+$i,ial!,orr+p&ion!propose$!.*!h+%an!ri"h&s!aler&!n"o
    xxxvi
    Zernik, J8 Da&a @inin" o' Online J+$i,ial <e,or$s o' &he Ce&/orke$ () >e$eral -o+r&s, In&erna&ional Jo+rnal on
    )o,ial @e$ia8 @oni&orin", @eas+re%en&, @inin", 18?A!I3 260104
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,33I36I7I73
    xxxvii
    Zernik, J8 Invali$ 9le,&roni, <e,or$ )*s&e%s o' &he )&a&e an$ >e$eral () -o+r&s R 9na.lers o' =+%an <i"h&s A.+se
    an$ &he >inan,ial -risis R -HB9<FA# 6013 paper R peer!revie/e$ an$ a,,ep&e$, &hen reje,&e$ a$%inis&ra&ivel*.
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,31170404013
    xxxviii
    6010!03!64 () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia8 Fo,al <+les o' -o+r&,-hap&ers 1!4
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36II?643I3
    xxxix
    -O(<T <(F9), Berkele* Fa/ Fi.ar*
    h&&p833///.la/..erkele*.e$+3li.rar*3$*na%i,3"+i$e.phpXi$\76
    xl
    6010!03!64 Beneral Or$ers o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36II?10I43
    xli
    6010!03!64 () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia8 -@39-> K(no''i,ialK An$erson @an+al
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36II?A7333
    () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, 9as&ern Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia8 (sers @an+al ! 9le,&roni, >ilin" -@39->
    h&&p833///.,ae$.+s,o+r&s."ov3,ae$3DO-(@9CT)3-@9->3(ser@an+al.p$'
    xlii
    600I!06!07 () Dis&ri,& -o+r& -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia8 *eneral 3rder 0I!06
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,367?364713
    xliii
    2010'0!'2& 7eneral 8rders o$ the () 9istrict 1o#rt" 1entral 9istrict o$ 1ali$ornia
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36II?10I43
    xliv
    6011!01!07 %og a(in Repu(licans v USA et al 210!7??344 a& &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, A&h -ir,+i& ! @o&ion &o
    In&ervene an$ -on,o%i&an&l* >ile$ Papers as p+.lishe$ in &he online PA-9< $o,ke&s
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/&310!&/
    xlv
    6010!03!64 () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia8 -@39-> K(no''i,ialK An$erson @an+al
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36II?A7333
    xlvi
    6010!03!67 A$$en$+% P1 &o <e0+es& 'or Opinions <e8 -@39-> ! ,ase %ana"e%en& s*s&e% o' &he () -o+r& o'
    Appeals A&h -ir,+i&, as revie/e$ in or$ers in >ine v )heri''
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/24323540/
    6010!04!07 A$$en$+% P6 &o <e0+es& 'or 9xper&sL Opinions <98 -ase %ana"e%en& s*s&e% CDAs, () -o+r& o' Appeals,
    A&h -ir,+i&
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/2432-35!/
    xlvii
    6010!03!30 CDAs 2Co&i,es o' 9le,&roni, >ilin"s4 a& () -o+r& o' Appeals, A&h -ir,+i&8 <+les, Or$ers. (serLs B+i$e,
    Ni$eo Trans,rip&s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36A1?71173
    xlviii
    >. -oenen8 Neri'i,a&ion an$ Nali$a&ion Iss+es in 9xper& an$ Da&a.ase )*s&e%s8 The 9xper& )*s&e%sPerspe,&ive,
    $exa, pp.1?, A&h In&erna&ional #orkshop on Da&a.ase an$ 9xper& )*s&e%s Appli,a&ions2D9[ALAI4, 1AAI
    -o$$, 9 >8 The rela&ional %o$el 'or $a&a.ase %ana"e%en&8 version 6,A-@ -lassi, Books )eries,A$$ison!#esle*
    P+.lishin" -o%pan*, In,, 1AA0
    xlix
    *he we% site o$ the :dministrative 8$$ice o$ the () co#rts provides the $ollowing in$ormation:
    -@39-> is &he 'e$eral ,o+r&sL ,ase %ana"e%en& an$ ele,&roni, ,ase 'iles s*s&e%. I& provi$es ,o+r&s enhan,e$ an$
    +p$a&e$ $o,ke& %ana"e%en&. I& allo/s ,o+r&s &o %ain&ain ,ase $o,+%en&s in ele,&roni, 'or%. An$ i& "ives ea,h ,o+r& &he
    op&ion o' per%i&&in" ,ase $o,+%en&s ! plea$in"s, %o&ions, pe&i&ions ! &o .e 'ile$ /i&h &he ,o+r& over &he In&erne&.
    -@39-> i%ple%en&a&ion in &he .ankr+p&,* ,o+r&s has .een +n$er/a* sin,e earl* 6001. Dis&ri,& ,o+r& i%ple%en&a&ion
    .e"an in 6006. Appella&e ,o+r& i%ple%en&a&ion .e"an in la&e 6004.
    The &ransi&ion &o a Cex& Benera&ion o' -@39-> is /ell +n$er/a*. The re0+ire%en&s "a&herin" phase o' &he proje,&
    ,on,l+$e$ in @ar,h 6016, as "ro+ps o' j+$"es, ,ha%.ers s&a'', ,lerks, an$ ,o+r& s&a'' i$en&i'ie$ an$ priori&ize$ h+n$re$s
    o' re0+ire%en&s. The proje,& also re,eive$ inp+& 'ro% &he .ar, a,a$e%ia, "overn%en& a"en,ies, an$ o&hers &hro+"h
    in&ervie/s, 'o,+s "ro+ps, an$ s+rve*s o' approxi%a&el* 10,000 j+$i,iar* s&akehol$ers. The proje,& is in &he $esi"n an$
    $evelop%en& phase. The ini&ial s,he$+le ,alls 'or &he 'irs& Cex& Benera&ion release &o .e availa.le &o &he ,o+r&s in 6014,
    'ollo/e$ .* '+ll &ransi&ion over several *ears. The 'irs& release /ill in,l+$e ,en&ral si"n!on '+n,&ionali&*, /hi,h /ill allo/
    +sers o' -@39-> an$ PA-9< &o %ain&ain one a,,o+n& a,ross all ,o+r&s an$ &o si"n in one &i%e &o a,,ess %+l&iple ,o+r&s.
    >or %ore in'or%a&ion, please ,on&a,&8 Bar.ara Gi%.le, O''i,e o' J+$"es Pro"ra%s 26064 706!1I?6.
    The &ransi&ion &o a Cex& Benera&ion o' -@39-> is /ell +n$er/a*. The re0+ire%en&s "a&herin" phase o' &he proje,&
    ,on,l+$e$ in @ar,h 6016, as "ro+ps o' j+$"es, ,ha%.ers s&a'', ,lerks, an$ ,o+r& s&a'' i$en&i'ie$ an$ priori&ize$ h+n$re$s
    o' re0+ire%en&s. The proje,& also re,eive$ inp+& 'ro% &he .ar, a,a$e%ia, "overn%en& a"en,ies, an$ o&hers &hro+"h
    in&ervie/s, 'o,+s "ro+ps, an$ s+rve*s o' approxi%a&el* 10,000 j+$i,iar* s&akehol$ers. The proje,& is in &he $esi"n an$
    $evelop%en& phase. The ini&ial s,he$+le ,alls 'or &he 'irs& Cex& Benera&ion release &o .e availa.le &o &he ,o+r&s in 6014,
    'ollo/e$ .* '+ll &ransi&ion over several *ears. The 'irs& release /ill in,l+$e ,en&ral si"n!on '+n,&ionali&*, /hi,h /ill allo/
    +sers o' -@39-> an$ PA-9< &o %ain&ain one a,,o+n& a,ross all ,o+r&s an$ &o si"n in one &i%e &o a,,ess %+l&iple ,o+r&s.
    >or %ore in'or%a&ion, please ,on&a,&8 Bar.ara Gi%.le, O''i,e o' J+$"es Pro"ra%s 26064 706!1I?6.
    http://www.#sco#rts.gov/;ederal1o#rts/10,1;/:%o#t10,1;.aspx
    l
    6010!06!16 Huminski v Rutland Police Department et al 218AA!,v!1?04a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Ner%on&8 >alse @e%o
    an$ Or$er! serve$ /i&h no C9> a& all
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!1!03!12/
    li
    6010!0A!66 <o.o!)i"na&+res R &he la&es& ,o%p+&er 'ra+$ in () .ankin" an$ ,o+r&s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,347?771703
    lii
    600A!0?!07 A$a% Fip&a%, KCe/ ),r+&in* o' J+$"eMs @os& -on&roversial -aseK, /7 ?imes
    http://www.nytimes.com/2004/0/0/#s/politics/0ricci.html
    600A!0?!1? John ),h/ar&z KIn B+n -ase, Peers )+ppor& )o&o%a*orK, /7 ?imes
    http://www.nytimes.com/2004/0/1-/#s/politics/1-6#dge.html
    6014 !07!03 A$a% Fip&ak6 KBir&h -on&rol Or$er Deepens Divi$e A%on" J+s&i,esK, /7 ?imes
    http://www.nytimes.com/201&/0-/0&/#s/politics/s#preme'co#rt'order's#spends'contraception'r#le'$or'
    christian'college.html
    600A!07!10 K)o&o%a*orMs Co&a.le -o+r& Opinions an$ Ar&i,lesK, /7 ?imes
    http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2004/03/2/#s/032'scot#s.html
    liii
    2012'01'21 :dam /iptak" )#preme 1o#rt +e6ects <#dge 9rawn 0aps in *exas +edistricting 1ase" /7 ?imes
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/21/#s/s#preme'co#rt're6ects'6#dge'drawn'maps'in'texas'redistricting'
    case.html
    6016!0?!6? A$a% Fip&ak, s+pre%e!,o+r&!$e,lines!&o!revisi&!,i&izens!+ni&e$, /7 ?imes
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/0/2/#s/s#preme'co#rt'declines'to'revisit'citi2ens'#nited.html
    liv
    6014!0I!6? Pro,e$+res o' &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, Wikipedia
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/=roced#res_o$_the_)#preme_1o#rt_o$_the_(nited_)tates
    lv
    6016!0?!11 A$a% Fip&ak K@*s&er* o' -i&izens (ni&e$ )e0+el Is >or%a&, Co& 9n$in"K, /7 ?imes
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/0/12/#s/in'citi2ens'#nited'ii'how'6#stices'r#le'may'%e'an'iss#e'itsel$.html
    lvi
    600I!0?!64 Zernik v ()D- 20I!767144 a& &he () -o+r& o' Appeals A&h -ir,+i& ! Alle"e$ >ra+$ on &he -o+r& an$
    (n$er%inin" o' Bankin" <e"+la&ion
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,33A7647413
    lvii
    6013!01!01 The =+%an <i"h&s Aler& 2CBO4 s+.%ission, as in,orpora&e$ in&o &he (C =+%an <I&"h&s -o+n,il (P<
    repror& /i&h &he no&e KFa,k o' in&e"ri&* in &he ele,&roni, re,or$s o' &he )+pre%e -o+r&, &he $is&ri,& ,o+r&s an$ &he
    $e&ainees ,o+r&s in IsraelK 2pa"e 4, para"raph 674
    http://daccess'dds'ny.#n.org/doc/(>981/7,>/712/150/12/=9;/71215012.pd$?8pen,lement
    lviii
    6011!07!06 C9> 2Co&i,e o' 9le,&roni, >ilin"4 in &he () -o+r&s 9le,&roni, >ilin" )*s&e% 2-@39->4
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,377I?64033
    lix
    6010!01!16 Huminski v0 Rutland Police Dept! et al 218AA!,v!1?04, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Ner%on& ! &/o 'alse an$
    $eli.era&el* %islea$in" C9>s serve$ on Plain&i'' =+%inski /i&h no -o+r& )&a%ps
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/23241-&2/
    lx
    6016!01!11 In <98 < B 26811!%,!006I44 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia ! %in+&es, or$ers,
    j+$"%en&s iss+e$ /i&h invali$ C9>s are invali$ ,o+r& re,or$s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3I437?60?3
    lxi
    6010!03!64 () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia8 -@39-> K(no''i,ialK An$erson @an+al. Co O''i,ial @an+al
    exis&e$.
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36II?A7333
    The ,orpora&e si&e8
    h&&p833e'ile.an$ersonla/.ne&3
    lxii
    6010!04!01 (ni&e$ )&a&es Dis&ri,& -o+r& 'or &he #es&ern Dis&ri,& o' Texas,A$%inis&ra&ive Poli,ies an$ Pro,e$+res 'or
    9le,&roni, >ilin"
    h&&p833///.&x/$.+s,o+r&s."ov3e,'3$o,s3e'ilepro,$.p$'
    lxiii
    600I!06!07 () Dis&ri,& -o+r& -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia8 Beneral Or$er 0I!06
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,367?364713
    lxiv
    6011!0?!60 PA-9< an$ -@39->8 Do,+%en& Neri'i,a&ion (&ili&*, as $es,ri.e$ in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Cor&hern Dis&ri,&
    o' Illinois
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37I41?7073
    lxv
    6010!03!67 A$$en$+% P1 &o <e0+es& 'or Opinions <e8 -@39-> ! ,ase %ana"e%en& s*s&e% o' &he () -o+r& o'
    Appeals A&h -ir,+i&, as revie/e$ in or$ers in >ine v )heri''
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/24323540/
    6010!04!07 A$$en$+% P6 &o <e0+es& 'or 9xper&sL Opinions <98 -ase %ana"e%en& s*s&e% CDAs, () -o+r& o' Appeals,
    A&h -ir,+i&
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/2432-35!/
    lxvi
    6010!03!30 CDAs 2Co&i,es o' 9le,&roni, >ilin"s4 a& () -o+r& o' Appeals, A&h -ir,+i&8 <+les, Or$ers. (serLs B+i$e,
    Ni$eo Trans,rip&s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36A1?71173
    lxvii
    6010!03!67 A$$en$+% P1 &o <e0+es& 'or Opinions <e -@39-> ! ,ase %ana"e%en& s*s&e% o' &he () -o+r& o'
    Appeals A&h -ir,+i&, as revie/e$ in or$ers in >ine v )heri''
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36A767IA03
    lxviii
    6010!03!30 De,lara&ion o' Dr Joseph Zernik in <98 CDAs, per&ainin" Richard #ine v Sheriff of %os Angeles ounty et
    al 20A!7?0734 an$ -oseph Zernik v US District ourt! entral District of alifornia 20I!767144, in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals,
    A&h -ir,+i&, o.&aine$ in a visi& &o () -o+r& o' Appeals A&h -ir,+i&
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36A461A773
    lxix
    6014!0I!6A <i,har$ )helle* v T+ali&* Foan )ervi,e -orp, e& al 20A!7?1334 in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, A&h -ir,+i& !
    'alse an$ $eli.era&el* %islea$in" CDA in a ,ase involvin" a 'inan,ial ins&i&+&ion
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,363I0I4A613
    lxx
    6011!01!0I Thro+"h I%ple%en&a&ion o' -ase @ana"e%en& )*s&e%s, &he -ali'ornia an$ &he () -o+r&s <en$ere$ &he
    J+$i,ial Pro,ess Na"+e an$ A%.i"+o+s
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/&314252/
    lxxi
    6013!01!01 The =+%an <i"h&s Aler& 2CBO4 s+.%ission, as in,orpora&e$ in&o &he (C =+%an <I&"h&s -o+n,il (P<
    repror& /i&h &he no&e KFa,k o' in&e"ri&* in &he ele,&roni, re,or$s o' &he )+pre%e -o+r&, &he $is&ri,& ,o+r&s an$ &he
    $e&ainees ,o+r&s in IsraelK 2pa"e 4, para"raph 674
    http://daccess'dds'ny.#n.org/doc/(>981/7,>/712/150/12/=9;/71215012.pd$?8pen,lement
    lxxii
    6014!04!67 Ashkenazi^7? o&her v @inis&er o' J+s&i,e e& al in &he =i"h -o+r& o' J+s&i,e 263003114 R Dr ZernikLs <e0+es&
    'or -er&i'i,a&ion o' Presi$in" J+s&i,e Br+nisLs De,ision, :Tr+e -op* o' &he Ori"inal; 2'+ll 9n"lish &ransla&ion4
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3661016A3I3
    lxxiii
    600I!06!07 () Dis&ri,& -o+r& -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia8 Beneral Or$er 0I!06
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,367?364713
    lxxiv
    6013!01!01 The =+%an <i"h&s Aler& 2CBO4 s+.%ission, as in,orpora&e$ in&o &he (C =+%an <I&"h&s -o+n,il (P<
    repror& /i&h &he no&e KFa,k o' in&e"ri&* in &he ele,&roni, re,or$s o' &he )+pre%e -o+r&, &he $is&ri,& ,o+r&s an$ &he
    $e&ainees ,o+r&s in IsraelK 2pa"e 4, para"raph 674
    http://daccess'dds'ny.#n.org/doc/(>981/7,>/712/150/12/=9;/71215012.pd$?8pen,lement
    lxxv
    600I!03!07 -ase o' Borro/er #illia% Parsle* 207!A03744, Dk& P64I8 J+$"e Je'' Boh%Ls @e%oran$+%
    Opinion, re.+kin" -o+n&r*/i$eLs li&i"a&ion pra,&i,es, -o+n&r*/i$eLs 'alse o+&si$e ,o+nsel s,he%e !
    appearan,es .* ,o+nsel /ho are no& -o+nsel o' <e,or$, /i&h Kno ,o%%+ni,a&ions /i&h ,lien&sK ,la+se8
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/230014/
    lxxvi
    6010!03!1A >ine v )heri'' 2680A!,v!01A144 -orrespon$en,e @r -arrizosa ! Dr Zernik re8 -ase -ap&ion in &he =a.eas
    -orp+s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36I?4074?3
    6010!03!1A. <i,har$ >ine8 Dr Zernik ! @r -arrizosaLs -orrespon$en,e on .ehal' o' &he -ali'ornia J+$i,ial -o+n,il in re8
    -ase -ap&ion in en"a"e%en& o' A&&orne* @,-or%i,k in >ine v )heri'' 2680A!,v!01A144
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/25&3322/
    lxxvii
    1AAA! () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia8 Beneral Or$er AA!07 ! -er&i'i,a&ion as &o In&eres&e$ Par&ies.
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34430?31A3
    lxxviii
    6010!0A!0A )e,+ri&ies an$ 9x,han"e -o%%ission, K>OIA <esponse Co 10!03A?4!>OIA, <98 S) v Bank of
    America orporation 2180A!,v!0?I6A4K
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34??0I77A3
    lxxix
    6013!01!01 The =+%an <i"h&s Aler& 2CBO4 s+.%ission, as in,orpora&e$ in&o &he (C =+%an <I&"h&s -o+n,il (P<
    repror& /i&h &he no&e KFa,k o' in&e"ri&* in &he ele,&roni, re,or$s o' &he )+pre%e -o+r&, &he $is&ri,& ,o+r&s an$ &he
    $e&ainees ,o+r&s in IsraelK 2pa"e 4, para"raph 674
    http://daccess'dds'ny.#n.org/doc/(>981/7,>/712/150/12/=9;/71215012.pd$?8pen,lement
    lxxx
    6013!10!64 ()8 PA-9< 'ra+$, $iappearin" re,or$s ! T)A li&i"a&ionW In'or/ars
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,317A0A4?773
    lxxxi
    6014!04!0A Tai&z v -olvin 21813!,v!01I7I4 in &he (.). Dis&ri,& -o+r& Dis&ri,& o' @ar*lan$ R re,or$s $isappeare$ 'ro%
    PA-9< $o,ke&_
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/211&2445/
    lxxxii
    6001!03!00 )&ren"&henin" J+$i,ial In&e"ri&* A"ains& -orr+p&ion ! (C In&erna&ional -ri%e Preven&ion -en&er
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34I103?A73
    lxxxiii
    60000!04!00 <epor& o' &he >irs& Nienna -onven&ion ! )&ren"&henin" J+$i,ial In&e"ri&*, -I-P!?, (ni&e$ Ca&ions Dr+"
    -on&rol an$ -ri%e Preven&ion -en&er 260004 2)ee p7!?4
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3703?44043
    lxxxiv
    6011!04!67 Da'na Finzer, KIn Bi&%o Opinion, T/o Nersions o' <eali&*K, ProPu(lica
    http://www.prop#%lica.org/article/in'gitmo'opinion'two'versions'o$'reality
    lxxxv
    6010!11!17 Ze%ik, J8 The -lerks an$ &he -alen$ars o' &he () -o+r&s
    ///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,346?I?0433
    lxxxvi
    6010!11!11 Ta.le 18 () Dis&ri,& -o+r&s8 PA-9< an$ -@39-> ! P+.li, A,,ess &o -alen$ars, )+rve* o' over 60 $is&ri,&
    ,o+r&s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3460717763
    lxxxvii
    6010!11!11 Ta.le 68 () Dis&ri,& -o+r&s PA-9< an$ -@39->8 P+.li, A,,ess &o -alen$ars ! )+rve* o' In$ivi$+al
    -ases in 7 Dis&ri,& -o+r&s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,346100?733
    lxxxviii
    6011!07!63 P<9)) <9F9A)98 -i&izens (ni&e$ v >e$eral 9le,&ion -o%%ission in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, D- ! invali$
    ,o+r& re,or$s in a )i%+la&e$ Fi&i"a&ion
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?0I010?3
    lxxxix
    6011!07!!64 <9 -i&izens (ni&e$ v >e$eral 9le,&ion -o%%ission 2>9-4 ! <e0+es& 'or Poli,* )&a&e%en&
    .* >9-
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?1474I63
    xc
    6011!01!67 <e0+es& 'or I%pea,h%en& o' () )+pre%e -o+r& -lerk #illia% )+&er
    ///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34773A3I63
    xci
    6010!!07!01 -o%plain& a"ains& () )+pre%e -o+nsel Dann* Bi,kell 'or Alle"e$ P+.li, -orr+p&ion
    an$ Depriva&ion o' <i"h&s
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!!--2!1!/
    x,ii
    6011!07!10 -i&izens (ni&e$ v >e$eral 9le,&ion -o%%ission ! )i%+la&e$ Fi&i"a&ion in &he () )+pre%e -o+r&O
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3770?43??3
    xciii
    6011!06!10 Press <elease8 >ra+$ Opine$ in () )+pre%e -o+r& <e,or$s <e,eive$ .* Pe&i&ioner #illia% #in$sor
    >ro% &he O''i,e o' -lerk )+&er
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34I?073673
    6011!01!1I Press <elease8 #in$sor v @ai$ o' &he @is& in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es an$ Alle"e$ -orr+p&ion
    o' &he O''i,e o' &he -lerk o' &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34714?I463
    xciv
    6010!0I!10 <98 >ine v Ba,a 20A!A16704 in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es ! De,lara&ion o' Beor"e
    @,Der%o&& in re8 April 6?, 6010 +nsi"ne$ le&&er .* +nna%e$ Dep+&* -lerk, no&i,in" $enial o' &he appli,a&ion, as
    $is,overe$ in -o+r& 'ile.
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!&-1-02/
    xcv
    6010!0I!13 <98 >ine v Ba,a 20A!AI674, >ine v Ba,a 20A!16704, an$ >ine v Ba,a 210!A644 a& &he )+pre%e -o+r& o'
    &he (ni&e$ )&a&es ! O,&o.er 600A Ter% Jo+rnal ! vali$i&*, or la,k &hereo'
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,33?47?A6?3
    xcvi
    6010!0I!13 >ine v Ba,a 20A!16704 Pe&i&ion 'or #ri& o' -er&iorari a& &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es 8 Online
    $o,ke&
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,33?4I1A673
    xcvii
    6010!0I!13 >ine v Ba,a 20A!16704 a& &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, online Or$er Fis&s per&ainin" &o $enial
    o' &he Pe&i&ion 'or #ri& o' -er&iorari
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,33?4I33473
    xcviii
    6010!07!6I Inspe,&ion o' paper ,o+r& 'iles in >ine v Ba,a 20A!AI674 in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es8
    De,lara&ion o' Beor"e @,Der%o&& in <e8 (nsi"ne$ Fe&&er $a&e$ April 6?, 6010, .* )+pre%e +nna%e$ Dep+&* -lerk re8
    Denial o' &he Appli,a&ion
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3370147AA3
    xcix
    6010!0I!10 <98 >ine v Ba,a 20A!A16704 in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es ! De,lara&ion o' Beor"e
    @,Der%o&& in re8 April 6?, 6010 +nsi"ne$ le&&er .* +nna%e$ Dep+&* -lerk, no&i,in" $enial o' &he appli,a&ion, as
    $is,overe$ in -o+r& 'ile.
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,33?4717063
    c
    6010!0I!10 <98 >ine v Ba,a 20A!A16704 in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es ! De,lara&ion o' Beor"e @,Der%o&&
    in re8 April 6?, 6010 +nsi"ne$ le&&er .* +nna%e$ Dep+&* -lerk, no&i,in" $enial o' &he appli,a&ion, as $is,overe$ in -o+r&
    'ile.
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!&-1-02/
    ,i
    6013!01!01 The =+%an <i"h&s Aler& 2CBO4 s+.%ission, as in,orpora&e$ in&o &he (C =+%an <I&"h&s -o+n,il (P<
    repror& /i&h &he no&e KFa,k o' in&e"ri&* in &he ele,&roni, re,or$s o' &he )+pre%e -o+r&, &he $is&ri,& ,o+r&s an$ &he
    $e&ainees ,o+r&s in IsraelK 2pa"e 4, para"raph 674
    http://daccess'dds'ny.#n.org/doc/(>981/7,>/712/150/12/=9;/71215012.pd$?8pen,lement
    cii
    6014!07!10 Fe&&er &o Presi$in" J+s&i,e Br+nis8 <e0+es& 'or ,lari'i,a&ion in re ! perver&e$ )+pre%e -o+r& re,or$s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,363336A66?3
    ciii
    The &er%s si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion an$ si%+la&e$ ,o+r& re,or$s are +se$ in ins&an& s+.%ission in &he sense provi$e$ .* &he
    Texas la/8
    Texas Penal -o$e ! )e,&ion 36.4I. )i%+la&in" Fe"al Pro,ess
    J 36.4I. )I@(FATICB F9BAF P<O-9)).
    2a4 A person ,o%%i&s an o''ense i' &he person re,klessl* ,a+ses &o .e $elivere$ &o
    ano&her an* $o,+%en& &ha& si%+la&es a s+%%ons, ,o%plain&, j+$"%en&, or o&her ,o+r& pro,ess /i&h &he in&en& &o8
    214 in$+,e pa*%en& o' a ,lai% 'ro% ano&her person5 or
    264 ,a+se ano&her &o8
    2A4 s+.%i& &o &he p+&a&ive a+&hori&* o' &he $o,+%en&5 or
    2B4 &ake an* a,&ion or re'rain 'ro% &akin" an* a,&ion in response &o &he $o,+%en&, in ,o%plian,e /i&h &he
    $o,+%en&, or on &he .asis o' &he $o,+%en&.
    2.4 Proo' &ha& &he $o,+%en& /as %aile$ &o an* person /i&h &he in&en& &ha& i& .e 'or/ar$e$ &o &he in&en$e$ re,ipien& is a
    s+''i,ien& sho/in" &ha& &he $o,+%en& /as $elivere$.
    2,4 I& is no& a $e'ense &o prose,+&ion +n$er &his se,&ion &ha& &he si%+la&in" $o,+%en&8
    214 s&a&es &ha& i& is no& le"al pro,ess5 or
    264 p+rpor&s &o have .een iss+e$ or a+&horize$ .* a person or en&i&* /ho $i$ no& have la/'+l a+&hori&* &o iss+e or
    a+&horize &he $o,+%en&.
    2$4 I' i& is sho/n on &he &rial o' an o''ense +n$er &his se,&ion &ha& &he si%+la&in" $o,+%en& /as 'ile$ /i&h, presen&e$ &o,
    or $elivere$ &o a ,lerk o' a ,o+r& or an e%plo*ee o' a ,lerk o' a
    ,o+r& ,rea&e$ or es&a.lishe$ +n$er &he ,ons&i&+&ion or la/s o' &his s&a&e, &here is a re.+&&a.le pres+%p&ion &ha& &he
    $o,+%en& /as $elivere$ /i&h &he in&en& $es,ri.e$ .* )+.se,&ion 2a4.
    2e4 9x,ep& as provi$e$ .* )+.se,&ion 2'4, an o''ense +n$er &his se,&ion is a -lass A %is$e%eanor.
    2'4 I' i& is sho/n on &he &rial o' an o''ense +n$er &his se,&ion &ha& &he $e'en$an& has previo+sl* .een ,onvi,&e$ o' a
    viola&ion o' &his se,&ion, &he o''ense is a s&a&e jail 'elon*.
    A$$e$ .* A,&s 1AA7, 77&h Fe"., ,h. 1IA, J 3, e''. @a* 61, 1AA7.
    civ
    ,v
    Zernik, J8 =a.eas -orp+s in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es ! &he ,ase o' <i,har$ Isaa, >ine ! <evie/
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36476A0I43
    cvi
    6010!0I!1I Zernik, J8 Da&a @inin" o' Online J+$i,ial <e,or$s o' &he Ce&/orke$ () >e$eral -o+r&s, In&erna&ional
    Jo+rnal on )o,ial @e$ia8 @oni&orin", @eas+re%en&, @inin", 18?A!I3 260104
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,33I36I7I73
    cvii
    6010!01!0I )+pervisor An&onovi,h, Fos An"eles -o+n&*, repea& %ailin" o' Jan+ar* I, 6010 response 'ro% )heri'' Fee
    Ba,a in re8 Arres& an$ .ookin" re,or$s o' In%a&e <i,har$ >ine 21I643?74, in,l+$in" &he 'ra+$+len& a&&a,h%en&s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3677773413
    ,viii
    6010!03!67 #ine v Sheriff 2680A!,v!01A144 () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia ! Do,ke& <epor&
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3367?776A3
    cix
    1AAA!00!00 () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, Benral Or$er AA!07 ! -er&i'i,a&ion as &o Par&ies
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34430?31A3
    cx
    6010!03!1A P. -arrizosa, :<98 9n"a"e%en& o' A&&orne* @,-or%i,k in #ine v Sheriff 2680A!,v!01A144 in &he () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia;, Fe&&er on .ehal' o' &he -ali'ornia J+$i,ial -o+n,il
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36I?477663
    ,xi
    600A!0?!16 >ine v )heri'' 2680A!,v!01A144 Dk& P6? ! <epor& an$ <e,o%%en$a&ion .* () @a"is&ra&e -arla #oehrle
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,343AA61I73
    cxii
    600A!0?!64 >ine v )heri'' o' FA 20A!71?A64 a& &he () App -& A&h8 Dk& P06 ! ZernikLs 9x Par&e Appli,a&ion 'or Feave &o
    >ile
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36713I7003
    cxiii
    600A!0?!30 >ine v )heri'' 20A!71?A64 a& &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, A&h -ir,+i&, alle"e$ >ra+$ in +nsi"ne$
    +na+&hen&i,a&e$ or$er 2Dk& P44 iss+e$ in &he na%es o' -ir,+i& J+$"es Gozinski, Paez, an$ Tall%an $en*in" &he
    9%er"en,* Pe&i&ion o' <i,har$ >ine
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,367?6?7II3
    cxiv
    6010!03!30 De,lara&ion o' Dr Joseph Zernik in <98 CDAs, per&ainin" &o <i,har$ >ine v )heri'' o' Fos An"eles -o+n&*
    e& al 20A!7?0734 an$ Joseph Zernik v () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia 20I!767144, in &he () -o+r& o'
    Appeals, A&h -ir,+i&, o.&aine$ in visi& &o () -o+r& o' Appeals A&h -ir,+i&
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36A461A773
    cxv
    6010!03!67 A$$en$+% P1 &o <e0+es& 'or Opinions <e8 -@39-> ! ,ase %ana"e%en& s*s&e% o' &he () -o+r& o'
    Appeals A&h -ir,+i&, as revie/e$ in or$ers in >ine v )heri''
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/24323540/
    6010!04!07 A$$en$+% P6 &o <e0+es& 'or 9xper&sL Opinions <98 -ase %ana"e%en& s*s&e% CDAs, () -o+r& o' Appeals,
    A&h -ir,+i&
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/2432-35!/
    cxvi
    2010!04!60 >ine v )heri'' 20A!AI674 >a,e pa"es o' 'ive 'ilin"s .* Dr Joseph Zernik, /i&h s&a%ps sho/in" re,eip& .*
    &he () )+pre%e -o+r& s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,330304?773
    6010!04!1I >ine v )heri'' 20A!AI674 1 A%en$e$ @o&ion &o In&ervene s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3301?17733
    6010!04!1I >ine v )heri'' 20A!AI674 6 A%en$e$ <e0+es& 'or Fenien,e .* Pro )e >iler s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3301?1?3?3
    6010!04!1I >ine v )heri'' 20A!AI674 3 A%en$e$ <e0+es& 'or -orre,&ions in () )+pre%e -o+r& <e,or$s s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3301?610A3
    6010!04!1I >ine v )heri'' 20A!AI674 4 A%en$e$ <e0+es& 'or In,orpora&ion .* <e'eren,e s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3301?61443
    6010!04!1I >ine v )heri'' 20A!AI674 Dr ZernikLs @o&ion &o In&ervene 7 A%en$e$ Appen$i,es s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3301?1?A63
    6010!04!1I >ine v )heri'' 20A!AI674 7 A%en$e$ Appen$ix I[ .8 ZernikLs De,lara&ion in re8 April 1?, 6010 sear,h 'or
    re,or$s in &he -o+r&s %i,ro'il% j+$"%en&s ar,hive s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3301I77773
    6010!04!66 >ine v )heri'' 20A!AI674 a& &he () )+pre%e -o+r& ! Dr ZernikLs De,lara&ion <98 -o+r& -o+nsel Dann* Bi,kell
    an$ >ilin" a& () )+pre%e -o+r&
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3314304?43
    cxvii
    6010!07!6I Inspe,&ion o' paper ,o+r& 'iles in >ine v Ba,a 20A!AI674 in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es8
    De,lara&ion o' Beor"e @,Der%o&& in <e8 (nsi"ne$ Fe&&er $a&e$ April 6?, 6010, .* )+pre%e +nna%e$ Dep+&* -lerk re8
    Denial o' &he Appli,a&ion
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!301&344/
    cxviii
    6010!07!67 >ine v Ba,a 20A!AI674 a& &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es ! <e,or$s o' Denial o' &he Appli,a&ion
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!&5!&3!0/
    cxix
    6010!07!01 In re8 >ine v )heri'' 20A!AI6748 -o%plain& a"ains& () )+pre%e -o+r& -o+nsel Dann* Bi,kell Alle"in"
    P+.li, -orr+p&ion an$ Depriva&ion o' <i"h&s
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!!--2!1!/
    cxx
    6010!07!6I Inspe,&ion o' paper ,o+r& 'iles in >ine v Ba,a 20A!AI674 in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es8
    De,lara&ion o' Beor"e @,Der%o&& in <e8 (nsi"ne$ Fe&&er $a&e$ April 6?, 6010, .* )+pre%e +nna%e$ Dep+&* -lerk re8
    Denial o' &he Appli,a&ion
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!301&344/
    cxxi
    6010!04!07 )iever$in" e& al v. (ni&e$ )&a&es Bovern%en& 2180A!,v!007?64 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D- R
    in re8 Arres& an$ I%prison%en& .* >e$eral A"en,ies ! Alle"e$ I%pea,ha.le @is,on$+,& .* () J+$"e John D Ba&es
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3476766713
    cxxii
    6010!04!07 )iever$in" e& al v. (ni&e$ )&a&es Bovern%en& 2180A!,v!007?64 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D- R
    in re8 Arres& an$ I%prison%en& .* >e$eral A"en,ies ! Alle"e$ I%pea,ha.le @is,on$+,& .* () J+$"e John D Ba&es
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3476766713
    ,xxiii
    6016!03!11 Ce&sphere In, e& al v Baron e& al 2380A!,v!00AII4 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Cor&hern Dis&ri,& o' Texas8
    -o%pile$ re,or$s 2Do,ke&, -alen$ar, -o%plain&, )+%%ons, Assi"n%en& Or$er, Or$er Appoin&in" <e,eiver , e&,4 R
    evi$en,e o' ra,ke&eerin" in &he -o+r&
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3I4A47?0A3
    cxxiv
    Ce&sphere In, e& al v. Baron e& al 2380A!,v!00AII4 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Cor&hern Dis&ri,& o' Texas8 -o%pile$
    re,or$s 2Do,ke&, -alen$ar, -o%plain&, )+%%ons, Assi"n%en& Or$er, Or$er Appoin&in" <e,eiver , e&,4 R evi$en,e o'
    ra,ke&eerin" in &he -o+r&
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3I4A47?0A3
    ,xxv
    A 'ra+$+len& no&e /as inser&e$ in &he $o,ke& +n$er Dk& P007, p+rpor&in" &o sho/ &he en&r* o' an Or$er <eassi"nin"
    &he ,ase &o J+$"e <OHAF >(<B9)O. In 'a,&, &he re,or$ linke$ +n$er Dk& P007 is an A''i$avi& o' 9xe,+&ion o' )ervi,e o'
    )+%%ons an$ -o%plain&.
    cxxvi
    6010!11!64 Dk& P163 R 9%er"en,* %o&ion 'or Appoin&%en& o' <e,eiver over Je''re* Baron
    ,xxvii
    Ce&sphere In,, e& al v Je''re* Baron 210!11604 in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, 7&h -ir,+i&8 -o%pile$ re,or$s 2Do,ke&,
    @o&ions, Or$ers4
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3I4IIII003
    ,xxviii
    The () Dis&ri,& -o+r& $o,ke& lis&s as <ela&e$ -ases in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, 7&h -ir,+i&8 10!11606, 11!10113, 11!
    106IA, 11!106A0. The $o,ke& o' Ce&sphere In,, e& al v Je''re* Baron 210!11604 in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, 7&h -ir,+i&,
    lis&s n+%ero+s o&her <ela&e$ -ases, all o' &he% s&ill ,+rren&.
    cxxix
    6003!06!11 Ce&sphere In,, e& al v Je''re* Baron 210!11604 in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, 7&h -ir,+i&8 @o&ion 'or
    <e,onsi$era&ion o' Dis&ri,& -o+r& Or$er Appoin&in" <e,eiver Over &he Person an$ Proper&* o' Je'' Baron.
    cxxx
    6003!06!11 Ce&sphere In,, e& al v Je''re* Baron 210!11604 in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, 7&h -ir,+i& @o&ion 'or
    <e,onsi$era&ion o' Dis&ri,& -o+r& Or$er Appoin&in" <e,eiver Over &he Person an$ Proper&* o' Je'' Baron
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3I4IIII003
    cxxxi
    600I!01!0I -ase o' Borro/er =ills 201!667744 ! in &he () Bankr+p&,* -o+r&, 9as&ern Dis&ri,& o' Penns*lvania,
    Pi&&s.+r"h. -o+n&r*/i$eLs Three K<e,rea&e$ Fe&&ersK an$ a Trans,rip&
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/2300!&4&/
    cxxxii
    600I!03!07 -ase o' Borro/er #illia% Parsle* 207!A03744, Dk& P64I8 J+$"e Je'' Boh%Ls @e%oran$+% Opinion,
    re.+kin" -o+n&r*/i$eLs li&i"a&ion pra,&i,es, -o+n&r*/i$eLs 'alse o+&si$e ,o+nsel s,he%e ! appearan,es .* ,o+nsel /ho
    are no& -o+nsel o' <e,or$, /i&h Kno ,o%%+ni,a&ions /i&h ,lien&sK ,la+se8
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/230014/
    cxxxiii
    6014!0I!60 Bo'A in Q1?.7 .illion $eal /i&h (.). over %or&"a"e .on$s8 so+r,e, Reuters
    h&&p833///.re+&ers.,o%3ar&i,le3601430I3603+s!.anko'a%eri,a!r%.s!se&&le%en&!i$()GBC0BG67-60140I60
    ,xxxiv
    6010!0?!1A Wright v Bank of America et al 27!10!,v!017634 a& &he () -o+r&, Cor&hern -ali'ornia8 Alle"e$
    ra,ke&eerin" .* Brian @o*nihan an$ Bank A%eri,a
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3336A171I3
    cxxxv
    6007!16!17 )a%aan v Zernik 2)-0I74004 Davi$ Pas&ernak8 Bran& Dee$s in re8 360 )o+&h Pe,k Drive, Beverl* =ills,
    -A A0616, opine$ as 'ra+$ .* Ja%es #e$i,k
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/2&4412!5/
    cxxxvi
    600I!07!67 Zernik v -onnor 2680I!,v!017704 a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, Dk& P 0?68 >irs&
    A%en$e$ -o%plain&8
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!0-!3&/
    cxxxvii
    6010!07!07 -o+n&r*/i$e, Bank o' A%eri,a DCH)95BA-E, an$ i&s Presi$en& Brian @o*nihan -o%pila&ion o' <e,or$s
    9vi$en,e o' <a,ke&eerin"
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!04-3!5/
    cxxxviii
    6010!07!07 -hairs o' () -on"ress -o%%i&&ees o' &he J+$i,iar* an$ Bankin" Are <e0+es&e$ &o Join )ena&or
    >eins&einLs In0+iries on -o%p&roller o' &he -+rren,*
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!04-4552/
    cxxxix
    6010!07!0? -o%plain& >ile$ /i&h () A&&orne* O''i,e Fos An"eles A"ains& @o*nihan Bank o' A%eri,a DCH)98BA-E
    Br*an -ave FFP Alle"in" <a,ke&eerin"
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!!4-1044/
    cxl
    600I!07!67 Zernik v -onnor 2680I!,v!017704 a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, Dk& P 0?68 >irs&
    A%en$e$ -o%plain&8
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!0-!3&/
    cxli
    6011!07!6? Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, D- ! /ill'+l %is,on$+,& .* () J+$"e
    <i,har$ Feon &o ,over +p ,orr+p&ion o' &he Fos An"eles ,o+r&s .* -o+n&r*/i$e an$ Bank o' A%eri,a
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?31AAAI3
    cxlii
    6011!07!11 Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-8 Do,ke& an$ o&her PA-9<
    repor&s in )i%+la&e$ Fi&i"a&ion ,on$+,&e$ .* J+$"e <i,har$ Feon an$ -lerk Can,* @a*er!#hi&&in"&on
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3776314?63
    cxliii
    6011!04!61 KIn >inan,ial -risis, Co Prose,+&ions o' Top >i"+resK ! Be,a+se o' /i$esprea$ ,orr+p&ion o' &he j+s&i,e
    s*s&e%, &he* are e''e,&ivel* i%%+neO
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/3!3200!/
    cxliv
    6011!01!07 )+perior -o+r& o' Fos An"eles -o+n&*, -ali'ornia8 #i$esprea$ P+.li, -orr+p&ion an$ <e'+sal o' ()
    Depar&%en& o' J+s&i,e &o Take A,&ion
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34?4?0?403
    cxlv
    600A!06!14 -ali'ornia )ena&e .ill provi$in" re&roa,&ive i%%+ni&ies 2Kpar$onsK4 'or all j+$"es /ho &ook Kno& per%i&&e$K
    pa*%en&s 2K.ri.esK4.)B[6!11
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36714A0473
    ,xlvi
    6010!04!1A =+%an <i"h&s Aler& 2CB04 s+.%ission &o &he (ni&e$ Ca&ions =+%an <i"h&s -o+n,il 'or &he 6010 <evie/
    2(P<4 o' =+%an <i"h&sin &he (ni&e$ )&a&es as in,orpora&e$ in&o &he (P< s&a'' repor&, /i&h re'eren,e &o K,orr+p&ion o' &he
    ,o+r&s an$ &he le"al pro'essionK.
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,33I7??I373
    cxlvii
    600A!04!60 Pro' 9li*ah+ )ha%irLs Opinion Fe&&er re8 )+s&ain ! &he -ase @ana"e%en& )*s&e% o' &he )+perior -o+r&
    o' -ali'ornia, -o+n&* o' Fos An"eles
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34?0?A3373
    cxlviii
    6010!0I!1I Zernik, J8 Da&a @inin" as a -ivi, D+&* R Online P+.li, PrisonersM <e"is&ra&ion )*s&e%s, In&erna&ional
    Jo+rnal on )o,ial @e$ia8@oni&orin", @eas+re%en&, @inin" 18 I4!A? 260104
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,33I36I7A13
    cxlix
    D1E 6010!07!07 -o+n&r*/i$e, Bank o' A%eri,a DCH)95BA-E, an$ i&s Presi$en& Brian @o*nihan -o%pila&ion o'
    <e,or$s 9vi$en,e o' <a,ke&eerin"
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,330A773?I3
    D6E 6010!07!07 -hairs o' () -on"ress -o%%i&&ees o' &he J+$i,iar* an$ Bankin" Are <e0+es&e$ &o Join )ena&or
    >eins&einLs In0+iries on -o%p&roller o' &he -+rren,*
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,330A7AII63
    D3E 10!07!0? -o%plain& >ile$ /i&h () A&&orne* O''i,e Fos An"eles A"ains& @o*nihan Bank o' A%eri,a DCH)98BA-E Br*an
    -ave FFP Alle"in" <a,ke&eerin"
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,333A710AA3
    cl
    6011!07!11 Zernik v "elson et al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-8 Do,ke& an$ o&her 'ra+$+len&
    PA-9< repor&s in )i%+la&e$ Fi&i"a&ion ,on$+,&e$ .* J+$"e <i,har$ Feon an$ -lerk Can,* @a*er!#hi&&in"&on
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/332!1&2/
    cli
    600A!07!01 Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-8 2Dk& P1!14 -o%plain&
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?6I?04A3
    600A!07!01 Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-8 2Dk& P1!64 -o%plain& !
    9xhi.i&s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?6I?40I3
    600A!07!01 Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-8 2Dk& P1!34 -o%plain& ! -ivil
    -over shee&
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?6I??4A3
    clii
    600A!07!01 Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-82Dk& P64 @o&ion 'or
    -@39-> pass/or$
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?6I?I163
    cliii
    600A!07!13 Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-8 2Dk& P34 )&a&e%en& 'or
    Dis0+ali'i,a&ion o' ()J+$"e <i,har$ Feon
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?6I73173
    ,liv
    600A!07!13 Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-8 2Dk& P44 @o&ion &o ,o%pel
    &he i%prisone$ <i,har$ >ineLs >irs& A%en$%en& ri"h&s .* provi$in" hi% pen an$ paper
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?6I7?7?3
    ,lv
    6011!04!63 =a.eas -orp+s in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es ! &he ,ase o' <i,har$ Isaa, >ine
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36476A0I43
    clvi
    600A!0?!03 Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-8 2Dk& P74 <e0+es& 'or
    revie/ o' ,on$+,& o' &he ,lerk
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/325-41-/
    clvii
    600A!07!01 Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-82Dk& P64 @o&ion 'or
    -@39-> pass/or$
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?6I?I163
    ,lviii
    600A!0?!0I Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-8 2Dk& P0?4 <e0+es& 'or
    s&a&e%en& on &he re,or$ .* J+$"e <i,har$ Feon an$ -lerk o' &he -o+r& per&ainin" &o re'+sal &o $o,ke& papers 'ile$ in
    ,o+r&, in,l+$in" s&a&e%en& 'or $is0+ali'i,a&ion o' J+$"e <i,har$ Feon.
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?6II4333
    clix
    600A!0?!30 Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-8 2Dk& P074 @e%oran$+%
    Opinion .* J+$"e <i,har$Feon=h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?6IA6773 =0A!0?!30 Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074
    in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-8 2Dk& PI4 Or$er .* () J+$"e <i,har$ Feon
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?6IA4703
    ,lx
    600A!0?!30 Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I0748 >ra+$+len& :Or$er; 2Dk& PI4 %aile$ .* J+$"e <i,har$ Feon &o pro
    se Plain&i''
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3776304143
    ,lxi
    600A!0?!6A Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I0748 >ra+$+len& papers %aile$ .* J+$"e <i,har$ Feon &o pro se plain&i'',
    /i&h &he ins,rip&ions:Feave &o 'ile $enie$;.
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37766A7?A3
    ,lxii
    600A!0I!13 Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-8 2Dk& PA4 9x Par&e <e0+es&
    'or C9>s 2ele,&roni,a+&hen&i,a&ion re,or$s4 o' or$ers serve$ .* &he ,o+r&
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?6IA??33
    ,lxiii
    6011!11!16 P<9)) <9F9A)98 @ai$ o' &he @is& -orpora&ion 9& Al v Al,a&raz @e$ia, FF-, e& al 21!0A!-v!017434
    )i%+la&e$ Fi&i"a&ion ! >ra+$in &he () -o+r&, Cor&hern Dis&ri,& o' Beor"ia
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37767677?3
    clxiv
    6011!06!10 Press <elease8 >ra+$ Opine$ in () )+pre%e -o+r& <e,or$s <e,eive$ .* Pe&i&ioner #illia% #in$sor
    >ro% &he O''i,e o' -lerk )+&er
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34I?073673
    6011!01!1I Press <elease8 #in$sor v @ai$ o' &he @is& in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es an$ Alle"e$ -orr+p&ion
    o' &he O''i,e o' &he -lerk o' &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34714?I463
    ,lxv
    6011!07!6? #in$sor v 9vans e& al 21810!,v!001A74 in &he () -o+r&, Dis&ri,& o' -ol+%.ia ! #ill'+l @is,on$+,& .* ()
    J+$"e <i,har$ Feon &o ,over +p ,orr+p&ion o' &he () -o+r&, Cor&hern Dis&ri,& o' Beor"ia
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?30410A3
    clxvi
    600A!07!61 Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-8 2Dk& Pnone4 )+ppor&in"
    <e,or$s P1 ! 9vi$en,e o' ,orr+p& pra,&i,es .* -o+n&r*/i$e an$ Bank o' A%eri,a in &he () -o+r&s ! Kleave &o 'ile $enie$K
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?6A7A073
    600A!07!61 Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-8 2Dk& Pnone4 )+ppor&in"
    <e,or$s P6 ! >ra+$ 9xper& Opinion <e8 >ra+$ .* -ali'ornia J+$"es in ,oll+sion /i&h -o+n&r*/i$e, Bank o' A%eri,a in &he
    )+perior -o+r& o' -ali'ornia, -o+n&* o' FosAn"eles ! Kleave &o 'ile $enie$K
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?6A?6003
    600A!07!61 Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-8 2Dk& Pnone4 )+ppor&in"
    <e,or$s P3 ! <e0+es&s 'or Assis&an,e .* >orei"n A%.assa$ors in re8 A.+se o' <i"h&s in &he )+perior -o+r& o' -ali'ornia,
    -o+n&* o' Fos An"eles ! Kleave &o 'ile $enie$K
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?6A?3A73
    600A!07!61 Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-8 2Dk& Pnone4 )+ppor&in"
    <e,or$s P4 ! Co&i,e 'ile$ .* Zernik in &he () Bankr+p&,* -o+r& in Texas in re8 >ra+$ .* -o+n&r*/i$e in &he )+perior
    -o+r& o' -ali'ornia, -o+n&* o' Fos An"eles ! Kleave &o 'ile $enie$K
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?6A?7I33
    600A!07!61 Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-8 2Dk& Pnone4 )+ppor&in"
    <e,or$s P7 ! <e,or$s 'ile$ .* Zernik in &he () Bankr+p&,* -o+r& in Texas in re8 >ra+$ .* -o+n&r*/i$e in &he )+perior
    -o+r& o' -ali'ornia, -o+n&* o' Fos An"eles ! Kleave &o 'ile $enie$K
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?6A?I7A3
    600A!07!61 Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-8 2Dk& Pnone4 )+ppor&in"
    <e,or$s P? ! A$$i&ional <e,or$s 'ile$ .* Zernik in &he () Bankr+p&,* -o+r& in Texas in re8 >ra+$ .* -o+n&r*/i$e in &he
    )+perior -o+r& o' -ali'ornia, -o+n&* o' Fos An"eles ! Kleave &o 'ile $enie$K
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?6A703A3
    600A!07!61 Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-8 2Dk& Pnone4 )+ppor&in"
    <e,or$s P7 ! >+r&her <e,or$s 'ile$ .* Zernik in &he () Bankr+p&,* -o+r& in Texas in re8 >ra+$ .* -o+n&r*/i$e in &he )+!
    perior -o+r& o' -ali'ornia, -o+n&* o' Fos An"eles ! Kleave &o 'ile $enie$K h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?6A74173
    600A!07!61 Zernik v @elson e& al 2180A!,v!00I074 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-8 2Dk& Pnone4 )+ppor&in"
    <e,or$s PI ! >+r&her 9vi$en,e 'ile$ .* Zernik in &he () Bankr+p&,* -o+r& in Texas in re8 >ra+$ .* -o+n&r*/i$e in &he
    )+perior -o+r& o' -ali'ornia, -o+n&* o' Fos An"eles ! Kleave &o 'ile $enie$K
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?6A7AA43
    ,lxvii
    6010!10!60 The () -o+r&s 9s&a.lishe$ a Poli,* 9x,l+$in" An* Papers Per&ainin" &o J+$i,ial -orr+p&ion 'ro% &he >irs&
    A%en$%en& <i"h& &o>ile Pe&i&ions
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,33A7II3?43
    ,lxviii
    Zernik, J.8 KDesi"n an$ Opera&ion o' In'or%a&ion )*s&e%s o' &he () -o+r&s are Finke$ &o >ailin" Bankin"
    <e"+la&ionK, Da&a Anal*&i,s 6016, Bar,elona, )pain
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3100?633333
    clxix
    Zernik, J.8 )e,+ri&ies an$ 9x,han"e -o%%ission v Bank o' A%eri,a -orpora&ion ! )i%+la&e$ Fi&i"a&ion an$
    )i%+la&e$ Bankin" <e"+la&ion in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,344??36363
    clxx
    600I!0A!64 >BI Inves&i"a&es >o+r >ir%s a& =ear& o' &he >inan,ial @ess, ?ruthout
    h&&p833&r+&h!o+&.or"3ar,hive3,o%ponen&3k63i&e%3I06708'.i!inves&i"a&es!'o+r!'ir%s!a&!hear&!o'!&he!'inan,ial!%ess
    ,lxxi
    6016!03!17 )&a&e%en& o' <o.er& ). @+eller, III, >BI Dire,&or, .e'ore &he (ni&e$ )&a&es )ena&e, -o%%i&&ee on
    Appropria&ions, )+.,o%%i&&ee on -o%%er,e, J+s&i,e, ),ien,e an$ <ela&e$ A"en,ies
    h&&p833///.appropria&ions.sena&e."ov3si&es3$e'a+l&3'iles3hearin"s3@+ellerU60Tes&i%on*U60>ICAF.p$'
    clxxii
    600A!04!63 <98 S) v BA 2180A!,v!0?I6A4 )&a&e o' Ce/ Hork A&&orne* Beneral An$re/ -+o%o Fe&&er &o ()
    -on"ress an$ anal*s&sL responses8
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/&10-4440/
    clxxiii
    6011!04!13 Bre&,hen @or"enson, KCa%in" -+lpri&s in &he >inan,ial -risisK, /7?
    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/0&/1&/%#siness/1&crisis.html?pagewanted=all
    clxxiv
    6011!04!13 () )ena&e )+.,o%%i&&ee on Inves&i"a&ions, K#all )&ree& an$ &he >inan,ial -risis8 Ana&o%* o' a
    >inan,ial -ollapseK
    http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/0&/1&/%#siness/1&crisis'docviewer.html
    ,lxxv
    6011!04!14 Bre&,hen @or"enson, KIn >inan,ial -risis, Co Prose,+&ions o' Top >i"+resK, /7?
    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/0&/1&/%#siness/1&prosec#te.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
    clxxvi
    6013!03!0? @ark Bon"lo'', K9ri, =ol$er A$%i&s )o%e Banks Are J+s& Too Bi" To Prose,+&eK, Huffington Post
    http://www.h#$$ingtonpost.com/201!/0!/0/eric'holder'%anks'too'%ig_n_2521-&1.html
    clxxvii
    6013!03!0? Trans,rip& o' A&&orne* Beneral 9ri, =ol$erLs re%arks .e'ore &he )ena&e J+$i,iar* -o%%i&&ee, in /hi,h
    he $is,+sses &he i$ea &ha& so%e .anks are LToo Bi" &o JailL, American Banker
    h&&p833///.a%eri,an.anker.,o%3iss+es317IW473&rans,rip&!a&&orne*!"eneral!eri,!hol$er!on!&oo!.i"!&o!jail!10776A7!1.h&%l
    clxxviii
    6010!0I!1I Zernik, J8 Da&a @inin" o' Online J+$i,ial <e,or$s o' &he Ce&/orke$ () >e$eral -o+r&s, In&erna&ional
    Jo+rnal on )o,ial @e$ia8 @oni&orin", @eas+re%en&, @inin", 18?A!I3 260104
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!5!25353/
    clxxix
    6010!11!07 () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' Ce/ Hork8 a4 Fo,al <+les, .4 9-> <+les an$ Ins&r+,&ions, ,4
    A&&orne*Ls 9-> Di,&ionar*
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34174AI043
    clxxx
    6010!11!07 () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' Ce/ Hork8 a4 Fo,al <+les, .4 9-> <+les an$ Ins&r+,&ions, ,4
    A&&orne*Ls 9-> Di,&ionar*
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34174AI043
    ,lxxxi
    The ,o%ple&e PA-9< $o,ke& /i&h $e&aile$ anal*sis, a$$i&ional re,or$s in li&i"a&ion o' S) v BA 2180A!,v!0?I6A4,
    an$ links &o %os& o' &he re,or$s in &he re'eren,e lis& .elo/, are provi$e in &he Online Appen$ix a&8
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,344??36363
    clxxxii
    )ee li&i"a&ion re,or$s, .io"raphi,al no&es o' &he j+$"es an$ a&&orne*s involve$, ne/s repor&s, an$ rela&e$ re,or$s
    +n$er8 6011!0?!30 <98 "c*arry v *eriatric #acilities of ape od $nc et al 21810!,v!113434 ! <a,ke&eerin" &hro+"h
    )i%+la&e$ Fi&i"a&ion in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, @assa,h+se&&s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37A1641?A3
    clxxxiii
    -ase <e,or$s8 @ai$ O' The @is& -orpora&ion e& al v #illia% #in$sor 2180?!,v!007144
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/&305&55/
    6011!06!13 @ai$ o' &he @is& -orpora&ion e& al v #illia% #in$sor 2180?!,v!007144 ! 9vi$en,e o' <a,ke&eerin" in &he ()
    Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Cor&hern Dis&ri,& o' Beor"ia
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34I77A0A33
    ,lxxxiv
    6016!16!11 "aid of the "ist orporation et al v William Windsor 210!1013A4 in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, 11&h -ir
    -o%pile$ <e,or$s o' Appeal s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3470I0A703
    6011!01!1I Press <elease8 Windsor v "aid of the "ist in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es an$ Alle"e$ -orr+p&ion
    o' &he O''i,e o' &he -lerk o' &he )+pre%e -o+r&
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34714?I463
    6011!06!10 Windsor v "aid of the "ist orporation 210!?A0 an$ 10!A?A04 ! >ra+$ opine$ in () )+pre%e -o+r& re,or$s,
    re,eive$ .* @r #in$sor 'ro% o''i,e o' -lerk )+&er
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34I7A?163
    6011!11!6I William " Windsor v "aid of the "ist orporation! et al 210!A?A04 in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es8
    a4 )+""es&e$ re0+es& 'or a vali$ re,or$ o' $enial, ,er&i'ie$ .* J+s&i,e Tho%as, an$ .4 <e,or$s provi$e$ on Jan+ar* 6I,
    6011 .* @r #in$sor
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/&---!-!1/
    clxxxv
    6014!07!67 KAr"en&inaMs $e.& sa"a ! (nse&&lin" &i%esK, ?he )conomist
    h&&p833///.e,ono%is&.,o%3ne/s3a%eri,as361?0I?3I!,lo,k!&i,kin"!&o/ar$!ar"en&ine!$e'a+l&!+nse&&lin"!&i%es
    ,lxxxvi
    6006!06!6I KAr"en&inaLs ,ollapse. A $e,line /i&ho+& parallelK, ?he )conomist
    ///.e,ono%is&.,o%3no$e31010A11
    clxxxvii
    6014!07!67 KAr"en&ina .ra,e$ 'or soverei"n $e.& $e'a+l&K, #inancial ?imes
    h&&p833///.'&.,o%3in&l3,%s3s3036$e41,6a!177a!11e4!ae6e!00144'ea.$,0.h&%lPaxzz3BD&Aeh&s
    clxxxviii
    6014!0I!66 KAr"en&ina sla%s (.). j+$"e as Li%perialis&,L peso hal&s ro+&K, Reuters
    http://www.re#ters.com/article/201&/05/22/#s'argentina'de%t'id()?.>0700@-201&0522
    clxxxix
    6014!0I!63 C@F -api&al v <ep+.li, o' Ar"en&ina 2180I!,v!0?A7I4 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' Ce/
    Hork
    h&&ps833$rive."oo"le.,o%3'ile3$30BIAa6xTB.%k7TNZNT=Hx.(Z'T%@3e$i&X+sp\sharin"
    cxc
    6006!0?!0? Blo.alisa&ion an$ i&s $is,on&en&s .* Joseph )&i"li&zWThe 9,ono%is&
    www.arlindo'correia.com/100402.html
    cxci
    6010!16!30 Fe/is e& al v Bleason e& al 21810!,v!01I704 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -olora$o R Opinion <e"ar$in"
    PA-9< Do,ke& an$ -o+r& <e,or$s in a -ivil <i"h&s @a&&er
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34?0I71403
    cxcii
    6011!06!0A Press <elease8 ]DonM& Ask, DonM& TellM &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, A&h -ir,+i& Insis&s on -on$+,&in" a
    )i%+la&e$ Appeal 'ro% a )i%+la&e$ J+$"%en& o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/&40-0!13/
    cxciii
    6011!06!16 <9 ! <epl* in <e ! >OIA <esponse on Fo" -a.in <ep+.li,ans v ()A e& al 26804!,v!0I4674 in &he ()
    Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia s
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/5&50&2&/
    cxciv
    () la/, 6I ()- 1?A1 re0+ires8
    All /ri&s an$ pro,ess iss+in" 'ro% a ,o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es shall .e +n$er &he seal o' &he ,o+r& an$ si"ne$ .* &he
    ,lerk &hereo'.
    cxcv
    600I!06!00 () Dis&ri,& -o+r& -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia8 Beneral Or$er 0I!06, A+&horizin" -@39->, Di"i&al
    A+&hen&i,a&ion an$ A&&es&a&ion in C9>s
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/2-!2&-1/
    Co&e8 The () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia i&sel' ,on,e$e$ &ha& j+$i,ial re,or$s, iss+e$ /i&h invali$
    a+&hen&i,a&ion re,or$s 2C9>s ! Co&i,e o' 9le,&roni, >ilin"4 are invali$ ,o+r& re,or$s, /hi,h sho+l$ .e re%ove$ 'ro% &he
    $o,ke&s8
    6016!03!0I The () -o+r&s 9n"a"e in Far"e!),ale >ra+$ on &he People
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/5&3!30&/
    cxcvi
    6011!04!16 P<9)) <9F9A)98 Bri.in" o' )&a&e an$ () J+$"es .* Bank o' A%eri,a @+s& .e a )erio+s -on,ern_
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/325&302/
    ,x,vii
    6011!01!0I Press <elease8 ]DonM& Ask DonM& Tell ! %o&ion &o in&ervene Appeals &o Dis%iss &he Appeals 'ro% an
    (n,er&i'ie$ J+$"%en&, /as Pos&e$ in &he Do,ke&, is Co/ Pen$in" .e'ore &he -o+r&!s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34?76I46I3
    J. Zernik, :@o&ion &o In&ervene an$ -on,o%i&an&l* >ile$ Papers,; in %og a(in Repu(licans v USA et al 210!7??344 in
    &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, A&h -ir,+i& Dk& P3A!47, Jan+ar* 7, 60115 re&rieve$ )ep&e%.er 4, 60165 a,,essi.le a&8
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34?71?0343
    cxcviii
    6010!16!07 %og a(in Repu(licans v United States of America et al 26804!,v!0I4674 ! Co&i,e &o -o+nsel in <e
    <e0+es& 'or I%pea,h%en& Pro,ee$in"s in <e -lerk T9<<H CA>I)I
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/&&5324/
    cxcix
    6011!0A!6A P+.lishe$ Opinion in Fo" -a.in <ep+.li,ans v ()A e& al in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, A&h -ir,+i& &he
    o+&,o%e o' si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/5&--!24 /
    cc
    i 6010!16!0A Fo" -a.in <ep+.li,ans v (ni&e$ )&a&es o' A%eri,a e& al 26804!,v!0I4674 ! <e0+es& 'or -opies o'
    A&&es&a&ions .* &he -lerk o'&he -o+r&
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,344A?31I?3
    ii 6010!16!0? Fo" -a.in <ep+.li,ans v (ni&e$ )&a&es o' A%eri,a e& al 26804!,v!0I4674 a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral
    Dis&ri,& o'-ali'ornia ! DonL& Ask DonM& Tell ! li&i"a&ion re,or$s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3447700A33
    iii 6010!16!0? Fo" -a.in <ep+.li,ans v ()A 26804!,v!0I4674 a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia8 DonM&
    Ask DonM& Tell R 9vi$en,e o' Ano&her Pre&ense Fi&i"a&ion .* J+$"e Nir"inia Phillips
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3447713043
    iv <e,or$s o' Appeal R Fo" -a.in <ep+.li,ans v (ni&e$ )&a&es o' A%eri,a e& al
    210!7??344
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3447700A33
    v 6010!16!0A Press <elease8 Fo" -a.in <ep+.li,ans v (ni&e$ )&a&es o' A%eri,a e& al 26804!,v!0I4674 ]DonM& Ask DonM&
    TellL ! -lerk o' &he () -o+r& aske$ &o provi$e a&&es&a&ion re,or$s, ,er&i'* &he $o,ke&
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,344A7701A3
    cci
    6010!01!61 -i&izens (ni&e$ v >e$eral 9le,&ion -o%%ission 130 ).-&. I7? 260104 a& &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$
    )&a&es R opinion o' Pro' -he%erinsk* an$ #ikipe$ia overvie/
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3413?40I33
    ccii
    6011!07!17 P<9)) <9F9A)98 -i&izens (ni&e$ v >e$eral 9le,&ion -o%%ission in &he () )+pre%e -o+r& R so 'ar onl*
    a si%+la&e$ J+$"%en& re,or$ has .een $is,overe$O
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,377?134013
    cciii
    6011!07!63 <98 -i&izens (ni&e$ v >e$eral 9le,&ions -o%%ission, >9- >OIA Co. 6011!4?86n$ ZernikLs <epl* on
    >9-Ls 6n$ >OIA <esponse
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?04II033
    cciv
    6011!07!63 -i&izens (ni&e$ v >e$eral 9le,&ion -o%%ission 21!07!,v!66404 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, D-, invali$ ,o+r&
    re,or$s in a )i%+la&e$ Fi&i"a&ion
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?0I010?3
    ccv
    6011!07!63 -i&izens (ni&e$ v >e$eral 9le,&ion -o%%ission 21!07!,v!66404 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, D- R invali$ ,o+r&
    re,or$s in a ,ase o' )i%+la&e$ Fi&i"a&ion
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/305010/
    ccvi
    6011!07!63 <98 -i&izens (ni&e$ v >e$eral 9le,&ions -o%%ission, >9- >OIA Co. 6011!4?86n$ ZernikLs <epl* on >9Ls
    6n$ >OIA <esponse s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37?04II033
    ccvii
    6011!06!0A Press <elease8 ]DonM& Ask, DonM& TellM &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, A&h -ir,+i&, Insis&s on -on$+,&in" a
    Pre&ense Appeal 'ro% a Pre&ense J+$"%en& o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34A0703173
    ccviii
    Zernik, Joseph8 )e,+ri&ies an$ 9x,han"e -o%%ission v Bank o' A%eri,a -orpora&ion R )i%+la&e$ Fi&i"a&ion an$
    )i%+la&e$ Bankin" <e"+la&ion in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,344??36363
    ccix
    Zernik, J8 Da&a @inin" o' Online J+$i,ial <e,or$s o' &he Ce&/orke$ () >e$eral -o+r&s, In&erna&ional Jo+rnal on )o,ial
    @e$ia8 @oni&orin", @eas+re%en&, @inin", 18?A!I3 260104
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,33I36I7I73
    ccx
    6011!04!14 P<9)) <9F9A)98 =arvar$ Fa/ Pro'essor Ho,hai Benkler has .een aske$ &o revie/ &he evi$en,e o'
    lar"e!s,ale ,o%p+&er 'ra+$ in &he () ,o+r&s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,376AA3A?I3
    ,,xi
    6010!01!61 iti.ens United v #ederal )lection ommission 130 ).-&. I7? 260104 a& &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$
    )&a&es ! opinion o' Pro' -he%erinsk* an$ #ikipe$ia overvie/
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/&1!&05!/
    ,,xii
    6011!03!1? iti.ens United v #ederal )lection ommission 20I!6074 in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es !
    <evie/ an$ -o%pile$ Online <e,or$s
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/30400545/
    ccxiii
    6001!03!00 )&ren"&henin" J+$i,ial In&e"ri&* A"ains& -orr+p&ion ! (C In&erna&ional -ri%e Preven&ion -en&er
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34I103?A73
    ,,xiv
    60000!04!00 <epor& o' &he >irs& Nienna -onven&ion ! )&ren"&henin" J+$i,ial In&e"ri&*, -I-P!?, (ni&e$ Ca&ions Dr+"
    -on&rol an$ -ri%e Preven&ion -en&er 260004 2)ee p7!?4
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3703?44043
    ccxv
    6011!03!1? iti.ens United v #ederal )lection ommission 20I!6074 in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es !
    <evie/ an$ -o%pile$ Online <e,or$s
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/30400545/
    ccxvi
    11!07!10 <epl* on >9- <esponse on >9- >ree$o% o' In'or%a&ion A,& 2>OIA4 <e0+es&, Co. 6011!4?, in re8
    >e.r+ar* 66, 6010 J+$"%en& in -i&izens (ni&e$ v >e$eral 9le,&ion -o%%ission 20I!I074
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/3303!215/
    ,,xvii
    <e"ar$in" &he C9>s as a+&hen&i,a&ion re,or$s o' &he () ,o+r&s +n$er ele,&roni, 'ilin", see8
    6011!01!07 Fo" -a.in <ep+.li,ans v ()A e& al 210!7??344 a& &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, A&h -ir,+i& ! @o&ion &o In&ervene
    an$ -on,o%i&an&l* >ile$ Papers as p+.lishe$ in &he online PA-9< $o,ke&s
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/&310!&/
    ccxviii
    6011!01!67 <e0+es& 'or I%pea,h%en& o' () )+pre%e -o+r& -lerk #IFFIA@ )(T9< s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34773A3I63
    ,,xix
    600I!16!10 Dave anfield! K9x!J+$"e To% )par"o in$i,&e$ .* 'e$s 'or ,orr+p&ionK! ?roy Record
    http://www.troyrecord.com/general'news/20051210/ex'6#dge'tom'spargo'indicted'%y'$eds'$or'corr#ption
    ,,xx
    6016!03!17 Zernik, J8 Fos An"eles )+perior -o+r& ! /i$esprea$ ,orr+p&ion an$ re'+sal o' () "overn%en& &o &ake
    a,&ion, 1?&h #orl$ -ri%inolo"* -on"ress presen&a&ion
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3?13714?A3
    ccxxi
    6010!07!0? -o%plain& >ile$ /i&h () A&&orne* O''i,e Fos An"eles A"ains& @o*nihan Bank o' A%eri,a DCH)98BA-E
    Br*an -ave FFP Alle"in" <a,ke&eerin"
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!!4-1044/
    ccxxii
    ;einstein inA#iry on 7lenn ;ine ()98<
    ccxxiii
    6010!0I!67 <e0+es& 'or res&ora&ion o' A,,ess &o J+s&i,e 'ile$ /i&h () Depar&%en& o' J+s&i,e )enior -o+nsel
    Fa+ren,e Tri.e in re8 <i,har$ >ine
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!3111!/
    ,,xxiv
    6010!07!16 -o%plain& 'ile$ /i&h &he () A&&orne*Ls O''i,e, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, a"ains& () @a"is&ra&e -arla
    #oehrle an$ O&hers a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, on P+.li, -orr+p&ion
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3341A44033
    ccxxv
    6010!07!01 In re8 >ine v )heri'' 20A!AI6748 -o%plain& a"ains& () )+pre%e -o+r& -o+nsel Dann* Bi,kell Alle"in"
    P+.li, -orr+p&ion an$ Depriva&ion o' <i"h&s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3337763133
    ccxxvi
    6011!07!10 <e0+es& 'or i%pea,h%en& o' () A&&orne*, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, ACD<9M BI<OTT9, Jr, 'or
    &olera&in" ra,ke&eerin" .* -ali'ornia j+$"es, a&&orne*s, an$ o&hers
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37A70I7773
    ,,xxvii
    6011!07!10 <e0+es& 'or i%pea,h%en& o' () A&&orne*, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, ACD<9M BI<OTT9, Jr, 'or
    &olera&in" ra,ke&eerin" .* -ali'ornia j+$"es, a&&orne*s, an$ o&hers.
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37A70I7773
    ,,xxviii
    6011!07!0? :<e0+es& 'ile$ .* #in$sor an$ Zernik /i&h () A&&orne* Beneral 9ri, =ol$er 'or <evie/ o' In&e"ri&* o'
    P+.li, A,,ess an$ -ase @ana"e%en& )*s&e%s o' &he () -o+r&s;, Human Rights Alert 8/*3;
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37A4I071I3
    ccxxix
    6011!03!13 Pa+l Gr+"%an <e! The Bankin" -risis ! Ano&her Insi$e Jo. ! KA s*s&e% /here &he .ankers ,an ,hea&
    an$ $e'ra+$ /i&ho+& ,onse0+en,es...K /7 ?imes
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,370773?3A3
    ccxxx
    6011!04!14 Bre&,hen @or"enson an$ Fo+ise )&or*, KIn >inan,ial -risis, Co Prose,+&ions o' Top >i"+resK, /7 ?imes
    h&&p833///.n*&i%es.,o%360113043143.+siness314prose,+&e.h&%lXpa"e/an&e$\allSWr\0
    ccxxxi
    6013!60!14 @a&& Tai..i, KBan"s&er Bankers8 Too Bi" &o JailK, Rolling Stones
    h&&p833///.rollin"s&one.,o%3poli&i,s3ne/s3"an"s&er!.ankers!&oo!.i"!&o!jail!60130614
    ccxxxii
    6013!03!0? KTrans,rip&8 A&&orne* Beneral 9ri, =ol$er on LToo Bi" &o JailLK, American Banker
    h&&p833///.a%eri,an.anker.,o%3iss+es317IW473&rans,rip&!a&&orne*!"eneral!eri,!hol$er!on!&oo!.i"!&o!jail!
    10776A7!1.h&%l
    ccxxxiii
    6103!04!0? Jilian Ber%an, K 9ri, =ol$erLs 1AAA @e%o =elpe$ )e& The )&a"e >or LToo Bi" To JailLK,
    Huffington Post
    http://www.h#$$ingtonpost.com/201!/0/0&/eric'holder'1444'memo_n_!!5&450.html
    ccxxxiv
    6014!0I!60 K Bo'A in Q1?.7 .illion $eal /i&h (.). over %or&"a"e .on$s8 so+r,eK, Reuters
    h&&p833///.re+&ers.,o%3ar&i,le3601430I3603+s!.anko'a%eri,a!r%.s!se&&le%en&!i$()GBC0BG67-60140I60
    ccxxxv
    600A!04!63 <98 )9- v BA- 2180A!,v!0?I6A4 )&a&e o' Ce/ Hork A&&orne* Beneral An$re/ -+o%o Fe&&er &o ()
    -on"ress an$ anal*s&sL responses8
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/&10-4440/
    ccxxxvi
    =o/ar$ Zinn, KA PeopleLs =is&or* o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&esK, -hap&er 118 K<o..er Barons an$ <e.elsK
    h&&p833///.his&or*isa/eapon.,o%3$e',on13zinn.aron11.h&%l
    ccxxxvii
    D1E A+"+s& 3, 6010 <e0+es& 'or () O''i,er ! @ar* ),hapiro, )9- -hair &o Per'or% her D+&ies.
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3376I1?I63
    D6E J+l* 67, 6010 )9- >OIA response P10!03A?7, re8 -o%plain&s a"ains& Bank o' A%eri,a -orpora&ion 2CH)98BA-4 an$
    -o+n&r*/i$e >inan,ial -orpora&ion8
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!32-152/
    D3E @ar,h ?, 6010 -o%plain& 'ile$ /i&h )9- -hair @ar* ),hapiro a"ains& Bank o' A%eri,a -orpora&ion 2CH)98BA-4 an$
    i&s Presi$en&3-9O an$ 'or%er Beneral -o+nsel X Brian @o*nihan.
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/243!4-!/
    D4EJ+ne 11, 6010 -o%plain&s 'ile$ /i&h O''i,e o' -o%p&roller o' &he -+rren,* an$ )9- -hair @ar* ),hapiro a"ains&
    -o+n&r*/i$e >inan,ial -orpora&ion, Bank o' A%eri,a -orpora&ion, an$ i&s -9O3Presi$en& Brian @o*nihan alle"in" 'ra+$
    an$ ex&or&ion on Dr Zernik 'ra+$ on sharehol$ers, .ankin" re"+la&ors, an$ &he () &axpa*er.
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!240-&3!/
    ,,xxxviii
    @a* 6I, 6010 Joseph Zernik, K-o%plain& Pen$in" Be'ore -o%p&roller o' &he -+rren,* Alle"es <a,ke&eerin" .*
    Bo'A an$ Brian @o*nihanK
    h&&p833///.exa%iner.,o%3ar&i,le3,o%plain&!pen$in"!.e'ore!,o%p&roller!o'!&he!,+rren,*!alle"es!ra,ke&eerin"!.*!.o'a!an$!
    .rian!%o*nihan
    ccxxxix
    6011!10!14 P<9)) <9F9A)9 The )ena&e J+$i,iar* -o%%i&&ee is aske$ &o <evie/ 9vi$en,e o' Far"e!s,ale >ra+$
    in &he 9le,&roni, <e,or$ )*s&e%s o' &he () -o+r&s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3?I?4I7173
    ccxl
    Zernik, J8 9vi$en,e o' /i$esprea$ ,orr+p&ion o' &he () ,o+r&s an$ propose$ ,orre,&ive %eas+res s+.%i&&e$ &o &he ()
    =o+se o' <epresen&a&ives
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3I74I17773
    ccxli
    6011!10!13 <e0+es&in" )ena&or Feah*, -hair o' &he )ena&e J+$i,iar* -o%%i&&ee &o Ini&ia&e <evie/ o' 9vi$en,e o'
    Far"e!s,ale >ra+$ in &he 9le,&roni, <e,or$ )*s&e%s o' &he () -o+r&s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3?I77I7413
    ccxlii
    KIn a spee,h in Beor"e&o/n (niversi&*, )ena&or Feah*, -hair o' &he )ena&e J+$i,iar* -o%%i&&ee ,alle$ 'or a KTr+&h
    an$ <e,on,ilia&ion -o%%issionK on &he () Depar&%en& o' J+s&i,e.
    600A! Trans,rip& o' )ena&or Feah* spee,h
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,33I4766713
    ccxliii
    6011!01!10 <e0+es& 'or inves&i"a&ion3i%pea,h%en& pro,ee$in"s, in re8 () J+$"e J9D <AGO>> an$ -lerk <(BH
    G<AJI-G, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' Ce/ Hork, -on$+,& o' )e,+ri&ies an$ 9x,han"e -o%%i&&ee v Bank o'
    A%eri,a -orpora&ion 2180A!,v!0?I6A4
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34??1?7303
    ccxliv
    6010!16!04 <98 () J+$"es J9D <AGO>>, NI<BICIA P=IFFIP), JO=C #AFT9<, () @a"is&ra&e -A<FA
    #O9=<F9 ! <e0+es& 'or Inves&i"a&ion, I%pea,h%en& Pro,ee$in"s #here Appropria&e
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,344??A3I63
    ,,xlv
    6011!07!06 <e0+es& 'or I%pea,h%en&s () J+$"e Beor"e OLTool, -lerk )arah Thorn&on, Bo&h o' &he () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&, @assa,h+se&&s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37A1II04I3
    ccxlvi
    6011!0?!60 I%pea,h%en&s Inves&i"a&ion o' J+$"e John #al&er, @a"is&ra&e -arla #oehrle, -lerk Terr* Ca'isi, an$
    o&hers in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, in re8>ine v )&a&e Bar 26810!,v!0004I4
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37I6734373
    ccxlvii
    6011!0?!60 I%pea,h%en&s Inves&i"a&ion o' J+$"e John #al&er, @a"is&ra&e -arla #oehrle, -lerk Terr* Ca'isi, an$
    o&hers in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, in re8>ine v )&a&e Bar 26810!,v!0004I4
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,37I6734373
    ccxlviii
    6010!16!0I Press <elease ! <e0+es& 'or Inves&i"a&ion, I%pea,h%en& o' <(BH G<AJI-G, -lerk () Dis&ri,& -o+r&,
    )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' Ce/ Hork
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,344A10A7A3
    ccxlix
    6011!01!67 <e0+es& 'or I%pea,h%en& o' () )+pre%e -o+r& -lerk #IFFIA@ )(T9<
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34773A3I63
    ccl
    6011!01!0I Press <elease8 ]DonM& Ask DonM& TellL in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, A&h -ir,+i& ! @o&ion &o In&ervene,
    <e0+es&in" &he () -o+r& o' Appeals &o Dis%iss &he Appeals 'ro% an (n,er&i'ie$ J+$"%en&, /as Pos&e$ in &he Do,ke&, is
    Co/ Pen$in" .e'ore &he -o+r&
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34?76I46I3
    ccli
    600A!0?!30 #ine v Sheriff 20A!71?A64 in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, A&h -ir,+i& ! Or$er, alle"e$ as 'ra+$, iss+e$ .* Alex
    Gozinski, -hie' J+$"e, &o"e&her /i&h -ir,+i& J+$"es Paez an$ Tall%an
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/25210&&/
    cclii
    6010!04!60 @o&ion &o In&ervene an$ rela&e$ papers in >ine v )heri'' 20A!AI674 in &he () )+pre%e -o+r&
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,330304?773
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3301?17733
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3301?1?3?3
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3301?610A3
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3301?61443
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3301?1?A63
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3301I77773
    ccliii
    6010!07!01 In re8 >ine v )heri'' 20A!AI6748 -o%plain& a"ains& () )+pre%e -o+r& -o+nsel Dann* Bi,kell Alle"in"
    P+.li, -orr+p&ion an$ Depriva&ion o' <i"h&s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3337763133
    ccliv
    6010!01!14 Huminski v orsones 218AA!,v!001?04 a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Ner%on&8 Joseph ZernikLs 9x Par&e
    Appli,a&ion 'or Feave &o >ile an$ <e0+es& no& &o serve sha% ,o+r& or$ers on Pro )e Plain&i'' =+%inski
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36766A0743
    cclv
    6010!04!07 <e0+es& <esponse3-o%%en&s on Alle"a&ions o' >ra+$ in PA-9< S -@39-> ! () A$%inis&ra&ive O''i,e o'
    -o+r&s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36A74737I3
    ,,lvi
    600I!03!07 -ase o' Borro/er #illia% Parsle* 207!A03744, Dk& P64I8 J+$"e Je'' Boh%Ls @e%oran$+% Opinion,
    re.+kin" -o+n&r*/i$eLs li&i"a&ion pra,&i,es, -o+n&r*/i$eLs 'alse o+&si$e ,o+nsel s,he%e ! appearan,es .* ,o+nsel /ho
    are no& -o+nsel o' <e,or$, /i&h Kno ,o%%+ni,a&ions /i&h ,lien&sK ,la+se8
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/230014/
    cclvii
    600I!01!0I -ase o' Borro/er =ills 201!667744 ! in &he () Bankr+p&,* -o+r&, 9as&ern Dis&ri,& o' Penns*lvania,
    Pi&&s.+r"h. -o+n&r*/i$eLs Three K<e,rea&e$ Fe&&ersK an$ a Trans,rip&
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/2300!&4&/
    cclviii
    6011!10!11 P<9)) <9F9A)98 The A%eri,an Bar Asso,ia&ion is aske$ &o revie/ evi$en,e o' lar"e!s,ale 'ra+$ in &he
    ele,&roni, re,or$ s*s&e%s o' &he () ,o+r&s
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/53!&1!/
    ,,lix
    6011!04!14 P<9)) <9F9A)98 =arvar$ Fa/ Pro'essor Ho,hai Benkler has .een aske$ &o revie/ &he evi$en,e o'
    lar"e!s,ale ,o%p+&er 'ra+$ in &he () ,o+r&s
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/3244!45/
    ,,lx
    6010!04!67 <e0+es& an$ <e'+sal o' Opinion Fe&&er .* =arvar$ Fa/ ),hool Dean @ar&ha @ino/ in re8 Alle"e$ >ra+$
    in PA-9< an$ -@39->
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3304I76I?3
    cclxi
    10!04!67 <e0+es& 'or Opinion .* Hale Fa/ ),hool >a,+l&* in re8 Alle"e$ >ra+$ in PA-9< an$ -@39->
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3304I73773
    cclxii
    6010!0A!0A =arvar$ Dean @ino/, Boar$ o' A$visers o' =arvar$ -ivil <i"h&s -ivil Fi.er&ies Fa/ <evie/ Aske$ 'or
    A,kno/le$"%en& o' <e,eip& o' Paper )+.%i&&e$ &o &he Jo+rnal.
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!-15440/
    cclxiii
    6010!0A!0I =arvar$, Hale Fa/ Jo+rnals <e'+se &o <evie/ Paper Do,+%en&in" -orr+p&ion o' &he () J+s&i,e )*s&e%
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!-0--&01/
    cclxiv
    Zernik, J8 Invali$ 9le,&roni, <e,or$ )*s&e%s o' &he )&a&e an$ >e$eral () -o+r&s R 9na.lers o' =+%an <i"h&s
    A.+se an$ &he >inan,ial -risis R -HB9<FA# 6013 paper R peer!revie/e$ an$ a,,ep&e$, &hen reje,&e$ a$%inis&ra&ivel*.
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,31170404013
    cclxv
    6010!07!67 Joseph Zernik, KDe'i,ien& Fos An"eles Ti%es repor&in" on &he ,ase o' <i,har$ >ineK, )2aminer0com
    h&&p833///.exa%iner.,o%3ar&i,le3$e'i,ien&!los!an"eles!&i%es!repor&in"!on!&he!,ase!o'!ri,har$!'ine
    ,,lxvi
    600A!04!60 >ine v )heri'' 2680A!,v!01A144 Dk& P6 Co&i,e o' <e'eren,e &o @a"is&ra&e -arla #oehrle
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3446036473
    ,,lxvii
    600A!0?!16 >ine v )heri'' 2680A!,v!01A144 Dk& P6? ! <epor& an$ <e,o%%en$a&ion .* () @a"is&ra&e -arla #oehrle
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,343AA61I73
    cclxviii
    6014!01!0? Joseph Zernik, KD+pli,i&o+s () j+$"es8 Je$ <ako'', <i,har$ FeonK, 3p)d/e1s0com
    http'@@1110opedne1s0com@articles@A@Duplicitous+US+Budges+-ed+(y+-oseph+Zernik+Banking+rimeCBanking+
    risisCBanking+#raudCorruption+6D565E+>&A0html
    cclxix
    600A!04!0A Zernik v -onnor e& al 2680I!,v!017704 a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, Dk& P1078
    -o%pile$ <e,or$s o' Perver&e$ Dis,repan,* Co&i,es8
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!4--!5-/
    cclxx
    6010!04!60 #ine v Baca 20A AI674 @o&ion &o In&ervene an$ rela&e$ papers8
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!0!0&3-/
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!0113-!/
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!011!/
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!012104/
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!0121&&/
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!01142/
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!01533-3/
    cclxxi
    -o%plain& a"ains& () )+pre%e -o+r& -o+nsel Dann* Bi,kell Alle"e$ P+.li, -orr+p&ion an$ Depriva&ion o' <i"h&s
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!!--2!1!/
    cclxxii
    6010!03!67 De,lara&ion o' Joseph Zernik in re8 Nisi& &o () Dis& -r&, Fos An"eles, an$ Opinion re8 In&e"ri&* o'
    Opera&ions an$ a,,ess &o re,or$s in Joseph Zernik v Ja,0+eline -onnor e& al 2680I!,v!017704, <i,har$ >ine v )heri'' o'
    Fos An"eles -o+n&* 2680A!,v!01A144, an$ () v-i&* o' Fos An"eles e& al 26800!,v!117?A4
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36IA363613
    cclxxiii
    6014!0I!31 KBasel -o%%i&&ee %e%.ershipK, ?he Basel ommittee
    http://www.%is.org/%c%s/mem%ership.htm
    cclxxiv
    -onven&ion o' 7 O,&o.er 1A?1 A.olishin" &he <e0+ire%en& o' Fe"alisa&ion 'or >orei"n P+.li, Do,+%en&s, ?he
    Hague onference on Private $nternational %a1
    h&&p833///.h,,h.ne&3in$exWen.phpXa,&\,onven&ions.&ex&S,i$\41
    cclxxv
    (ni&e$ Ca&ions -onven&ion a"ains& Transna&ional Or"anize$ -ri%e an$ The Pro&o,ols There&o 260004
    h&&p833///.+no$,.or"3$o,+%en&s3&rea&ies3(CTO-3P+.li,a&ions3TO-U60-onven&ion3TO-e.ook!e.p$'
    cclxxvi
    6014!0I!30 )&a&+s o' (ni&e$ Ca&ions -onven&ion a"ains& Transna&ional Or"anize$ -ri%e, (ni&e$ Ca&ions
    https://treaties.#n.org/=ages/Biew9etails.aspx?src=*+,:*@&mtdsg_no=CBDDD'12&chapter=15&lang=en
    ,,lxxvii
    6013!11!03 <OB9< )=(F9< (PDAT9 Ala.a%a .lo""er /i'eLs a,,o+n& o' &he .ea&in", a.$+,&ion
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,31II0I00463
    ,,lxxviii
    6013!11!13 )ara <a'sk*, K-ensorship in Ala.a%aLs )hel.* -o+n&*K, ommittee to Protect -ournalists
    http://www.cp6.org/%log/201!/11/censorship'in'ala%amas'shel%y'co#nty.php
    ,,lxxix
    6013!11!0? G*le #hi&%ire, KA-F( 'i"h&s &o open ,o+r& re,or$s o' jaile$ .lo""er, ar"+es ,o+r& or$er +n,ons&i&+&ionalK,
    AF.,o%
    http://%log.al.com/spotnews/201!/11/acl#_$ights_to_open_co#rt_reco.html
    cclxxx
    6014!03!1? K#ill /e le& <o"er )h+ler 2KThe Fe"al ),hna+zerK4 s+''er alone an$ 'or"o&&enXK, Dai l y Fos
    h&&p833///.$ail*kos.,o%3s&or*3601430331?316I71I?3!#h*!is!&his!&ren$in"!on!re$$i&!.+&!a.sen&!here
    cclxxxi
    6014!03!60 An$re/ Grei", K-orr+p&ion!'i"h&in" jo+rnalis& <o"er )h+ler s&ill jaile$ a'&er 'ive %on&hsK, ProfessorsG Blog
    http://pro$essors%logg.com/201&/0!/20/corr#ption'$ighting'6o#rnalist'roger'sh#ler'still'6ailed'a$ter'$ive'
    months/
    cclxxxii
    2016!07!01 I%prisone$ ,o+r& /a&,her DANID )-=I9D ! The J+$i,ial =o+se o' -ar$s an$ =o/ I& is >allin" Do/n a&
    &he 9xpense o' &he People
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3AII0I14?3
    cclxxxiii
    6007!16!17 )a%aan v Zernik 2)-0I74004 Davi$ Pas&ernak8 Bran& Dee$s in re8 360 )o+&h Pe,k Drive, Beverl*
    =ills, -A A0616, opine$ as 'ra+$ .* Ja%es #e$i,k
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/2&4412!5/
    ,,lxxxiv
    600I!07!67 Zernik v onnor et al 2680I!,v!017704 Dk& P 0?6 >irs& A%en$e$ -o%plain&
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3307??3743
    cclxxxv
    6010!07!07 -o+n&r*/i$e, Bank o' A%eri,a DCH)95BA-E, an$ i&s Presi$en& Brian @o*nihan -o%pila&ion o' <e,or$s
    9vi$en,e o' <a,ke&eerin"
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!04-3!5/
    cclxxxvi
    =+%an <i"h&s Aler& 2CBO4 s+.%ission &o &he (ni&e$ Ca&ions =+%an <i"h&s -o+n,il 'or &he (P< o' &he (ni&e$
    )&a&es 260104, as i& appears in &he (ni&e$ Ca&ions =+%an <i"h&s -o+n,il si&e
    =TTP833li..oh,hr.or"3=<Bo$ies3(P<3Do,+%en&s3sessionA3()3=<Aler&W(P<W()AW)0AW6010W=+%anU60ri"h&s
    U60aler&1.pp$'
    =+%an <i"h&s Aler& 2CBO4 Appen$ix I &o s+.%ission 'or &he (P< o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es .* &he (ni&e$ Ca&ions =+%an
    <i"h&s -o+n,il
    h&&p833li..oh,hr.or"3=<Bo$ies3(P<3Do,+%en&s3sessionA3()3=<Aler&W(P<W()AW)0AW6010W=+%anU60ri"h&s
    U60aler&1.p$'
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36A7?43743
    (ni&e$ Ca&ions =+%an <i"h&s -o+n,il Pro'essional )&a'' <epor&, re'errin" &o =+%an <i"h&s Aler& s+.%ission /i&h &he
    no&e K,orr+p&ion o' &he ,o+r&s an$ &he le"al pro'ession an$ $is,ri%ina&ion .* la/ en'or,e%en& in -ali'orniaK 2pa"e ?,
    para"raph 474
    h&&p833$a,,ess!$$s!n*.+n.or"3$o,3(CDO-3B9C3B1031?A3?73PD>3B101?A?7.p$'XOpen9le%en&
    cclxxxvii
    6010!07!0? -o%plain& >ile$ /i&h () A&&orne* O''i,e, Fos An"eles, A"ains& Brian @o*nihan, Bank o' A%eri,a
    DCH)98BA-E, Br*an -ave FFP, Alle"in" <a,ke&eerin" an$ Far"e ),ale >inan,ial Ins&i&+&ion >ra+$
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!!4-1044/
    cclxxxviii
    600A!16!6A Zernik v -onnor 2680I!,v!017704, >ine v )heri'' 2680A!,v!01A144, () v -i&* o' FA e& al 26800!,v!
    117?A4 ! <e0+es& an$ <esponse in a&&e%p& &o "ain a,,ess &o C9>s ! -@39-> re,or$s o' () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral
    Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,364?I170I3
    cclxxxix
    6010!04!0I =+%an <i"h&s Aler& 2CBO4 s+.%ission &o &he (ni&e$ Ca&ions =+%an <i"h&s -o+n,il 'or &he (P< o'
    &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, as i& appears in &he (ni&e$ Ca&ions =+%an <i"h&s -o+n,il si&e
    h&&p833li..oh,hr.or"3=<Bo$ies3(P<3Do,+%en&s3sessionA3()3=<Aler&W(P<W()AW)0AW6010W=+%an ri"h&s aler&1.p$'
    ,,x,
    6016!01!11 In <98 < B 26811!%,!006I44 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia ! %in+&es, or$ers,
    j+$"%en&s iss+e$ /i&h invali$ C9>s are invali$ ,o+r& re,or$s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3I437?60?3
    ccxci
    600A!0I!01 >ine v )heri'' o' FA -o+n&* 2680A!,v!01A144 an$ Zernik v -onnor e& al 2680I!,v!0177048 -o%plain& an$
    <e0+es& 'or Inves&i"a&ion, >ile$ /i&h Terr* Ca'isi, -lerk o' &he -o+r&, <e"ar$in" Dishones& @anip+la&ion o' <e,or$s in &he
    O''i,e o' &he -lerk
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36I3407I73
    ccxcii
    600A!0A!1I Zernik v onnor 2680I!,v!017704 an$ #ine v Sheriff 2680A!,v!01A144 in () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,&
    o' -ali'ornia8 De,lara&ion o' Joseph Zernik in <e Denial o' A,,ess &o -o+r& <e,or$s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36I3400I03
    ccxciii
    600A!16!6A Zernik v -onnor 2680I!,v!017704, >ine v )heri'' 2680A!,v!01A144, () v -i&* o' FA e& al 26800!,v!117?A4
    ! <e0+es& &o inspe,& an$ &o ,op* C9>s, $+rin" visi& &o &he O''i,e o' &he -lerk, an$ ,opies o.&aine$ 'ro% () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/2&51305/
    ,,x,iv
    6010!01!01 Zernik v -onnor 2680I!,v!017704 ! -@39-> ! Ta.le )+%%ar* o' C9>s in Zernik v -onnor, .ase$ on
    ,opies provi$e$ .* -lerk on De,e%.er 6A, 600A
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,364?I13A73
    ccxcv
    6010!01!04 <e0+es&in" () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, FA -lerk Terr* Ca'isiLs s&a&e%en&s re $o,ke& o' Zernik v -onnor et al8 Is i&
    hones&, vali$, an$ e''e,&+al, in ,o%plian,e /i&h () la/X
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3647764A?3
    ccxcvi
    6010!01!04 Zernik v onnor et al 2680I!,v!017704, #ine v Sheriff 2680A!,v!01A144, $n re' Richard #ine 2680A!%,!
    0016A4, an$ US v ity of %A et al 84'55+cv+66HE&;' <e0+es& -lari'i,a&ions .* () Dis&ri,& -o+r& FA -lerk Terr* Ca'isi in re8
    Denial o' a,,ess &o re,or$s, an$ vali$i&* o' i%ple%en&a&ion o' PA-9< an$ -@39-> in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral
    Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, p+rs+an& &o Beneral Or$er 0I!06.
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36477?7A63
    ccxcvii
    6010!03!14 >ine v )heri'' 2680A!,v!01A144 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia8 <epea& ,o%plain&
    an$ re0+es& 'or ,lari'i,a&ion, e%aile$ &o Terr* Ca'isi, -lerk o' &he -o+r&, in re8 Denial o' a,,ess &o re,or$, an$ la,k o'
    in&e"ri&* o' re,or$s.
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36I3461763
    ccxcviii
    6010!01!1A >ine v )heri'' 2680A!,v!01A144, Zernik v -onnor e& al 2680I!,v!017704 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral
    Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia8 -orrespon$en,e /i&h -lerk Terr* Ca'isi, in re8 Nali$i&* o' $o,ke&s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,367446A7I3
    ccxcix
    6010!01!1A >ine v )heri'' 2680A!,v!01A144, Zernik v -onnor e& al 2680I!,v!017704 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral
    Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia8 -orrespon$en,e /i&h -lerk Terr* Ca'isi, in re8 Nali$i&* o' $o,ke&s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,367446A7I3
    ccc
    6010!06!1A Fe&&er .* K-o+r& -o+nselK F*$ia H+r&,h+k. () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& -ali'ornia, p+rpor&in" &o
    inves&i"a&e evi$en,e o' 'ra+$ in li&i"a&ion re,or$s o' <i,har$ >ineLs ha.eas -orp+s pe&i&ion, >ine v )heri'' 2680A!,v!01A144
    2NO)%.,: )hi re'!r" 4a rem!-e" (r!m S'rib"0'!m 4ith!ut m* 8n!4le"ge04
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3307?41013
    Ne4 UR&:
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,33046I3133
    ccci
    6010!!07!01 -o%plain& a"ains& () )+pre%e -o+nsel Dann* Bi,kell 'or Alle"e$ P+.li, -orr+p&ion
    an$ Depriva&ion o' <i"h&s
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!!--2!1!/
    cccii
    6010!03!1A #ine v Sheriff 2680A!,v!01A144 -orrespon$en,e @r -arrizosa ! Dr Zernik re8 -ase -ap&ion in &he =a.eas
    -orp+s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36I?4074?3
    ccciii
    6010!03!1? >ine v )heri'' 2680A!,v!01A144 a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Fos An"eles8 -lerk Terr* Ca'isiLs, <esponse &o
    ZernikLs <e0+es& 'or -lari'i,a&ions in <98 C9>s an$ -o%plain&s re8 Ta%perin" /i&h -o+r& <e,or$s
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/255&1-/
    ccciv
    6010!03!1? >ine v )heri'' 2680A!,v!01A144 a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Fos An"eles8 -lerk Terr* Ca'isiLs, <esponse &o
    ZernikLs <e0+es& 'or -lari'i,a&ions in <98 C9>s an$ -o%plain&s re8 Ta%perin" /i&h -o+r& <e,or$s
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/255&1-/
    cccv
    6010!03!67 Co&i,e &o -hie' J+$"e A+$re* -ollins, an$ <e0+es& &o Ini&ia&e -orre,&ive A,&ions in re8 Zernik v -onnor,
    >ine v )heri''
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,363I0067173
    cccvi
    6010!03!67 De,lara&ion o' Joseph Zernik in re8 Nisi& &o () Dis& -r&, Fos An"eles, an$ Opinion re8 In&e"ri&* o'
    Opera&ions an$ a,,ess &o re,or$s in Joseph Zernik v Ja,0+eline -onnor e& al 2680I!,v!017704, <i,har$ >ine v )heri'' o'
    Fos An"eles -o+n&* 2680A!,v!01A144, an$ () v -i&* o' Fos An"eles e& al 26800!,v!117?A4
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36IA363613
    cccvii
    6010!03!64 >ine v )heri'' in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia8 <e0+es& 'or '+r&her ,lari'i,a&ions .*
    -lerk o' &he -o+r& Terr* Ca'isi <98 Denial o' A,,ess, In&e"ri&* o' -o+r& <e,or$s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,36II771743
    cccviii
    6010!03!67 Co&i,e &o Presi$in" J+$"e A+$re* -ollins, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ronia, <e8 Geener v
    =)B- @or&"a"e )ervi,es In, e& al 2680A!,v!0?A7?4, li&i"a&ion involvin" 'inan,ial ins&i&+&ions, an$ &he 'inan,ial ,risis
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/2!-44--4/
    ,,,ix
    6010!16!67 KBanks an$ #ikiFeaksK, /7 ?imes
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,34?0764633
    ,,,x
    6013!01!67 <esponse .* Bovernor o' Bank o' Israel )&anle* >is,her, in re8 +nla/'+l seizin" o' .ank a,,o+&ns .*
    Bank =aPoali%, B@
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3163A71I373
    cccxi
    6013!06!0? A&&orne* Ja%es Ja&ras opinion in re8 Bank o' IsraelLs )&anle* >is,herLs Jan+ar* 67, 6013 >AT-A
    <esponse Fe&&er
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,31646477A73
    cccxii
    6016!10!63 Joseph Zernik v )&anle* >is,her 27?703164 Pe&i&ion in &he =i"h -o+r& o' J+s&i,e o' &he )&a&e o' Israel.
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3110I?I7733
    cccxiii
    6013!03!0I Zernik v >is,her 2=-J 7?703164 ! <e0+es& 'or &he -hie' -lerkLs ,lari'i,a&ion re"ar$in" a$+l&era&ion in
    )+pre%e -o+r& re,or$s
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,316A3036373
    cccxiv
    6013!01!63 <e0+es& 'or pro&e,&ion .* &he Ber%an A%.assa$or &o Israel o' a h+%an ri"h&s3,o%p+&er s,ien,e /ri&er
    in Jer+sale%
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/12141&&5/
    cccxv
    6013!07!63 Zernik v @inis&er o' J+s&i,e e& al 26?IA3134 ! <e0+es& &o a$$ a $o,+%en& ! J+$"e 9speranza Alon !
    %as&er o' &he K%*s&i,al se,re&s o' ,o+r& pro,e$+reK, or Ko.s&r+,&ionis& /i&h i%p+ni&*KX
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3143A0A7633
    cccxvi
    6014!01!63 Zernik v Fivni e& al 26?IA3134 R <epea& re0+es& 'or ,er&i'i,a&ion o' April 1I, 6016 De,ision an$ J+ne 67,
    6013 J+$"%en&, KTr+e -op* o' &he Ori"inalK 33 `bcdefghigjfgkl 6?IA313 mnoefpnqicnkerfdisktecnrjhmu 1I vifkwdi
    6013 mnoefpxfyjzwev 67 vfgefi 6013 kejpiofdspjs{n|v K.
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3601734I073
    ,,,xvii
    6013!0I!66 <e0+es& 'or pro&e,&ion .* &he Ber%an -ons+l in Israel o' a Ber%an ,i&izen a"ains& si%+la&e$ ,o+r&
    pro,ess
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,366360674I3
    ,,,xviii
    =o/ar$ Zinn, K-hap&er 118 <o..er Barons an$ <e.elsK, in8 PeopleLs =is&or* o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es.
    https://li%com.org/li%rary/peoples'history'o$'#nited'states'howard'2inn
    ,,,xix
    @essin"er, I ),o&&8 Or$er in The -o+r& ! =is&or* o' -lerks o' (ni&e$ )&a&es -o+r&s, >e$eral J+$i,ial -en&er 260064
    http://www.scri%d.com/doc/!&514--&/
    cccxx
    6014!04!1A Dan <o.er&s, K#all )&ree& $ere"+la&ion p+she$ .* -lin&on a$visers, $o,+%en&s revealK, ?he *uardian,
    (G
    http://www.theg#ardian.com/world/201&/apr/14/wall'street'dereg#lation'clinton'advisers'o%ama
    cccxxi
    6016!0I!67 Ja%es <i,kar$s, K<epeal o' Blass!)&ea"all -a+se$ &he >inan,ial -risisK,US /e1s
    http://www.#snews.com/opinion/%logs/economic'intelligence/2012/05/2-/repeal'o$'glass'steagall'ca#sed'
    the'$inancial'crisis
    ,,,xxii
    6010!01!61 -i&izens (ni&e$ v >e$eral 9le,&ion -o%%ission 130 ).-&. I7? 260104 a& &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he
    (ni&e$ )&a&es ! opinion o' Pro' -he%erinsk* an$ #ikipe$ia overvie/
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3413?40I33
    ,,,xxiii
    6016!07!11 O,,+p*@A<IC9) Press <elease 2J+l* I, 60164 ! $e'inin" $o,+%en& o' &he <o..er Baron <evival 9ra
    h&&p833///.s,ri.$.,o%3$o,3AAI4I1I?3
    ,,,xxiv
    @ove &o A%en$ /e.!pa"e
    h&&ps833%ove&oa%en$.or"3
    ,,,xxv
    6014!0?!30 Joseph Zernik, KA<B9CTICA8 A"ain on &he ver"e o' e,ono%i, ,ollapse ! a"ain &he vi,&i% o' ()
    &rea,her*_K, 3p)d/e1s0com
    h&&p833///.ope$ne/s.,o%3ar&i,les3A<B9CTICA!A"ain!on!&he!ve!.*!Joseph!Zernik!Ar"en&inaWBlo.al!Bankin"!
    -ar&elWIn&erna&ional!@one&ar*!>+n$!!I@>WIsrael!140?30!A63.h&%l
    ,,,xxvi
    6014!04!6A @a*er Bro/n, K() Dis&ri,& -o+r& =ol$s Tha& a Con!Par&* >orei"n Bank @+s& Prepare a #i&ness #i&h
    Do,+%en&s OverseasK
    h&&p833///.%a*er.ro/n.,o%3()!Dis&ri,&!-o+r&!=ol$s!Tha&!a!Con!Par&*!>orei"n!Bank!@+s&!Prepare!a!#i&ness!#i&h!
    Do,+%en&s!Overseas!04!6A!60143

    You might also like