Professional Documents
Culture Documents
-MMT
Nanocomposites
S. No
Chitosan
(%)
PDMS
(%)
Na
-MMT
(%)
Sample
Code
1. 85 5 10 CS-PD-A
2. 80 10 10 CS-PD-B
3. 70 20 10 CS-PD-C
4. 85 10 5 CS-PD-D
5. 70 10 20 CS-PD-E
185 PREPARATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF CS-g-PDMS AND Na
-MMT
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
DOI 10.1002/jbmb
between the scan ranges of 2y from 2 to 30 degree by the
scan rate of 2 degree/min. The d-spacing was calculated by
Braggs formula where the k was 0.154 nm.
FTIR Spectroscopy. The Fourier transform infrared
(FTIR) spectra were obtained from the sample under ATR
mode on a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum GX.
Elemental Analysis and Percentage of Grafting. The
content of C, H, and N was determined for pristine and
grafted CS samples. The total nitrogen content was deter-
mined according Dumas with a Carlo Erba NA 1500 instru-
ment. The percentage of grafting of the CS amino groups
was determined by the method given by Kweon
7
for grafted
samples, according to the equation
Grafting %
Weight of CS-g-PDMS Weight of CS
Weight of CS
3100
1
13
C NMR.
13
C NMR (I 1/2) CP MAS NMR spectra
were obtained in a Bruker Avance 300 spectrometer, using
a standard cross-polarization pulse sequence. Samples were
spun at 10 kHz. Spectrometer frequencies were set to
100.62 for
13
C. The numbers of scans were of 800. Chemi-
cal shift values were referenced to tetramethyl silane.
Thermo Gravimetric Analysis. The thermal gravimet-
ric analysis (TGA) was conducted on a Perkin-Elmer TGA
7-thermal analyzer from 508C to 9008C with a heating rate
of 108C/min under nitrogen with ow rate 20 mL/min.
Water Absorption Measurements. According to
ASTM D570 the clean, dried lm samples of known
weights were immersed in simulated body uid at 258C for
one day (24-h). The lms were removed, blotted quickly
with absorbent paper, and then weighed. The absorption per-
centage of these samples was calculated using the equation
X (%) (W
1
W
0
)/W
0
, where W
0
and W
1
are the weight of
dry and swollen samples, respectively. Three independent
measurements were performed for each sample and the aver-
age values were taken for swelling behavior studies.
RESULTS
Figure 1 shows the expected reaction mechanism for the
preparation of nanocomposites of CS-g-PDMS and MMT.
For nanocomposite preparation, aqueous suspension of
Na
-MMT
and its nanocomposites with CS-g-PDMS are shown in
Figure 4. It was reported,
20,21
that CS has an orthorhombic
unit cell of crystal plane 001 with a 8.24 A
, b 10.39 A
,
and c 16.48 A
, b 10.1 A
, and c 0.35 A
. The
peaks appearing at around 2y 5.28 are assigned to (001)
and (100), while the peaks around 2y 218 are assigned
to (020) and (200), according to ICDD No. 39-1894, which
can be identied as semicrystalline chitosan. The measured
d
001
-spacing of Na
-MMT
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
DOI 10.1002/jbmb
random copolymer. This will efciently destroy the regular-
ity of the packing of the original CS chains, which results
in the formation of almost amorphous copolymers as most
of the crystalline domains of CS were destroyed, as shown
by the broad peaks in the XRD patterns of the prepared
nanocomposites, and further conrmed by TGA and DTG
curves. Furthermore, it was found that the crystallinity of
CS was decreased with increasing clay content, which is
probably caused by the well-dispersed clay nanocrystals
that acts as point defects in the CS matrix. In addition Stra-
whecker et al.
22
also reported that strong polymer-ller
interaction could change the molecular conformation of
polymer chain in the vicinity of ller and simultaneously
gave rise to the formation of localized amorphous regions.
Besides the vibrational band characteristics of the sili-
cate [m
OH
of Al, Mg (OH) at 3635 cm
1
; m
OH
of H
2
O
3430 and 3250 cm
1
are diminished because of the elec-
trostatic interaction of polycationic CS (as shown in the
INSET Figure)], the bands attributed to the intercalated CS
and grafted copolymers are also observed. The peaks at
2920, 2880, 1430, 1320, and 1215 cm
1
attributed to the
symmetric/asymmetric CH stretching vibrations of pyranose
rings. A new peak in CS-PD-A, arising at 10251110 cm
1
is attributed to SiOSi stretch and 1270 cm
1
is due to
SiCH
3
, a nding consistent with the presence of PDMS
chains onto CS.
The percentage of grafting increases with the feed ratio
of PDMS to CS, approaching a saturation level of 19% for
CS-PD-C. The percentage of grafting increases as the feed
ratio increases but only at a constant clay amount. As the
amount of clay increases, that is for CS-PD-E, the percent-
age of grafting decreases. This is attributed to the fact that
the diffusion of PDMS chains into CS matrix was inhibited
under higher clay content. The results show that the light
transmittance of the materials does not change signicantly
in the presence of the clay (at low clay content), that is the
nanocomposite lms preserve the polymer transparency,
but at higher clay content the matrix will loose its optical
transparency resulting into lower extent of grafting. The
high value of light transmitted through the nanocomposites
is due to the ne dispersion of the ller into the polymer
matrixes; however, polymer microcomposites show a dras-
tic decrease of the light transmittance in the presence of
solid transparency.
23
Apart from this, CS will not only
effectively enlarge the interlamellar spacing of Na-
MMT,
but also form a uniform structure in clay. The size of clay
interlamellae is smaller than the wavelength of visible light
so that the composites might retain satisfactory transpar-
ency during UV irradiation.
Solid-state high-resolution NMR spectroscopy was also
applied to characterize the CS-g-PDMS nanocomposites.
Solid state CP-MAS 13-C NMR is known to be very sensi-
tive to changes in the local structure and the chemical
shifts of C-1 and C-4 carbon in 1, 4-linked carbohydrate
are believed to be highly sensitive to any conformational
change at the glycosidic linkage.
24
The resonance peaks for
CS are assigned according to the literature.
25
The signals
observed on the spectra at 23.4 and 174.9 ppm, were attrib-
uted to the signals of CH
3
and CO of the glucosa-
mine ring, respectively, are given in Figure 5. Apart from
this a new peak around 1.89 ppm, which is ascribable to
SiCH
3
,
26
appeared which conrms the grafting of PDMS
onto CS which is in good agreement with the results
obtained from FTIR.
The thermal decomposition prole exhibit two main
decomposition stages, with one starting at around 1008C
and another at 2208C. The rst stage may be attributed to
the elimination of both, nongallery surface adsorbed water
and interlayer water molecules. The amount of weight loss
at this temperature range decreased with increasing clay
content of the samples, which implies to the formation of a
CS-silicate complex, which decreases the water absorbabil-
ity of the lms, that is, decrease the hydrophilicity of the
lms. The second stage, observed a maximum weight loss
at around 2903008C, can be attributed to the scission of
the grafted copolymer chains. The weight loss at higher
temperature was observed to be low. It reveals the presence
of cross-linked structure, which is formed by thermal cross-
linking at rst stage of decomposition.
27
The maximum
decomposition temperatures was observed to be higher for
nanocomposites CS-PD-A and CS-PD-B than that for CS-
PD-E. The presence of nanosized silicate layers plays a
leading role in enhancing the thermal stabilities of the
grafted copolymers, by obstructing the out-diffusion of the
volatile decomposition products. It is important to mention
here that the values of char yields were almost coincident
with the amounts of the clay in nanocomposites. Therefore,
the increased char ratios mainly resulted from the nonvola-
tile silicate layers and the char formation from organic part
(grafted PDMS chains and CS). This was also supported
for other polymer-silica hybrid materials.
28
In case of CS-
PD-E (20 wt % clay), the incorporation of silicate layers
gets more and more hindered because of geometrical
Figure 5.
13
C NMR spectra of CS and CS-PD-A. [Color gure can be
viewed in the online issue, which is available at www.interscience.
wiley.com.]
188 DEPAN, KUMAR, AND SINGH
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
DOI 10.1002/jbmb
constraints within the limited space remaining available in
the polymer matrix. In other words, the polymer chain con-
nement into silicate galleries (in CS-PD-E) is reduced in a
limited space. The DTG curves corresponding to the pre-
pared nanocomposites show an endothermic process at
1608C, which is associated with a weight loss of physically
adsorbed water molecules and two endothermic processes
at 2948C and 4708C that is pyrolytic decomposition (weight
loss of 41%) followed by the combustion (weight loss of
33%) of the biopolymer.
Pure CS is hydrophilic, but it does not absorb much
water. CS displays many OH and NH groups, which
cause strong intermolecular and intramolecular hydrogen
bonds; thus the inltration and diffusion of water, is
restrained. The water absorption of PDMS grafted CS is
higher than the pristine CS. It can be attributed to the fact
that the presence of microphase separation of PDMS
amphiphile in CS matrix will effectively break the integrity
of molecular structure in grafted CS, which can expose
more functional groups for water absorption. Along with
this, the grafted hydrophobic PDMS backbone might
microphasically aggregate and renders hydrophilic parts
exposed due to hydroxyl end groups hydrogen bonding
with CS. This swelling extent will depend on the osmotic
pressure and charge repulsion, the degree of ionization and
grafting extent also,
29
which have already been demon-
strated by the dependence of lactic acid grafted CS on the
temperature and pH of solution. In comparison of grafted
CS, samples of nanocomposites have shown lower water
absorption and it decreases with increasing content of clay.
It can be attributed to the interaction between layered
silicates and copolymers in which intercalated polymer
chains, which are more responsible for hydrophilicity, were
conned into silicate galleries. Since Na
-MMT is hydro-
philic clay, resulting composites were expected to be
hydrophilic. The reduction in water absorption may be due
to the fact that the formation of nanocomposites occurred
through the cation exchange between NH
3
and Na
-MMT by a
cationic exchange process results into nanohybrids with
both interesting structural and functional properties. The
grafting of PDMS imparts the hydrophilicity and swelling
behavior to the CS. The incorporation of clay affects the
preparation and physiomorphic properties of grafted co-
polymer. The grafted PDMS chains were acting as a plasti-
cizer to give exible lms. The increasing content of clay
decreases water absorption and imparts little branched crys-
tallite structure in the lm. The swelling behavior and lon-
ger water retention properties were discussed, which could
be applied in biomedical eld. The optimization of the
composition of CS, different layered silicates and lactic
acid, mechanical properties, and cell adhesion study are
under progress.
Authors thank Dr. S. Sivaram, Director, National Chemical
Laboratory, Pune, India for his fruitful discussions and sugges-
tions. DD and BK are thankful to Council of Scientic and Indus-
trial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India, for granting Senior
research fellowships.
REFERENCES
1. Wang D-A, Ji J, Sun Y-H, Yu G-H, Feng L-X. Blends of
Stearyl poly(ethylene oxide) coupling polymers in chitosan as
coating material for polyurethane intravascular catheters.
J Biomed Mater Res 2001;58:372383.
2. Suh JK, Matthew HW. Application of CS based polysaccha-
ride biomaterials in cartilage tissue engineering: A review.
Biomaterials 2000;21:25892598.
3. Hutmacher DW, Goh JC, Teoh SH. An introduction to biode-
gradable materials for tissue engineering applications. Ann
Acad Med Singapore 2001;30:183191.
4. Shanmugasundram N, Ravichandran P, Reddy PN, Ramamur-
thy N, Pal S, Rao KP. Collagen-chitosan polymeric scaffolds
for the in-vitro culture of human epidermoid carcinoma cells.
Biomaterials 2001;22:19431951.
5. Shikhu H, Saito T, Wu C-C, Yasukawa T, Yokoo M, Abe H,
Matsue T, Yamada H. Oxygen permeability of surface-
modied poly(dimethyl siloxane) characterized by scanning
electrochemical microscopy. Chem Lett 2006;35:234235.
6. Senthil KU, Rajini R, Reddy BSR. Gas permeation and sorp-
tion properties of non-ionic and cationic amino-hydroxy func-
tionalized poly(dimethyl siloxane) membranes. J Membrane
Sci 2005;254:169177.
7. Kweon DK. Preparation and characteristics of chitosan-g-
PDMS copolymer. Polym Bull 1998;41:645651.
8. Jeong HM, Choi JS, Ahn YT, Kwon KH. Characteristics of
poly styrene/organoclay nanocomposites prepared by in-situ
polymerization with macroazoinitiator containing poly(di-
methyl siloxane) segment. J Appl Polym Sci 2006;99:2841
2847.
9. Gao Z, Nahrup JS, Mark JE, Sakr A. Poly(dimethyl siloxane)
coatings for controlled drug proles and swelling properties
189 PREPARATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF CS-g-PDMS AND Na
-MMT
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
DOI 10.1002/jbmb
of the free-standing lms. J Appl Polym Sci 2005;96:494
501.
10. Park JH, Bae YH. Hydrogels based on poly(ethylene oxide)
and poly(tetramethylene oxide) or poly(dimethyl siloxane).
III. In vivo biocompatibility and biostability. J Biomed Mater
Res Part A 2003;64:309319.
11. Lim F, Yang CZ, Cooper SL. Synthesis, characterization
and ex-vivo evaluation of poly-dimethylsiloxane poly urea-
urethane. Biomaterials 1994;15:408416.
12. Fernando W, Kestur S. Functionalization of single layers and
nanobres: A new strategy to produce polymer nanocompo-
sites with optimized properties. J Colloid Intern Sci 2005;285:
532543.
13. Emmanuel G. Polymer layered silicate nanocomposites:
Synthesis, properties and application. Appl Organomet Chem
1999;12:675680.
14. Dong Y, Feng SS. Poly(D,L-Lactide-co-glycoilde)/Montmoril-
lonite nanoparticles for oral delivery of anti cancer drugs.
Biomaterials 2005;26:60686076.
15. Suprakas SR, Masami O. Biodegradable polylactide and its
nanocomposites opening a new dimension for plastics and
composites. Macro Rapid Comm. 2003;24:815840.
16. Depan D, Singh RP. Preparation and characterization of
novel hybrid of chitosan-g-Lactic acid and montmorillonite.
J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2006;78:372382.
17. Ofori KK, Fell JT. Biphasic drug release: The permeability of
lms containing pectin, chitosan and HPMC. Int J Pharm
2005;26:139145.
18. Basit AW. Advances in colonic drug delivery. Drugs 2005;
65:19912007.
19. Kim IY, Kim SJ, Shin MS, Lee YM, Shin DI, Kim SI.
pH- and thermal characteristics of graft hydrogel based on
chitosan and poly(dimethyl siloxane). J Appl Polym Sci
2002;85:26612666.
20. Ogawa K, Hirano S, Miyanishi T. A new polymorph of chito-
san. Macromolecules 1984;17:973975.
21. Yui T, Imada K, Okuyama K. Molecular and crystal structure
of the anhydrous form of chitosan. Macromolecules 1994;27:
76017605.
22. Strawhecker KE, Manias E. Crystallization behavior of poly
(ethylene oxide) in the presence of Na