They are arguably the premier agent sculpting the surface of Earth today. Figure 1. Aerial view of mountaintop removal and reclamation landscapes, Big Coal River watershed. Photo by Lyntha Scott Eiler. American Folklife Center, Library of Congress. http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.afc/afccmns.lec03907 about 0.8 Gt (Gt = gigatons, or 1 billion tons) of earth in house construction, 3.2 Gt in mineral production, and 3 Gt in road construction. If all this earth were dumped into the Grand Canyon, it would fill the canyon in about 400 years, or about 0.01 percent of the time it has taken the Colorado River to carve it! Such a comparison is not so far-fetched as one might think. A common method of coal mining in West Virginia today is mountain top removal (Fig. 1). To gain access to coal seams at depth, entire mountain tops may be unceremoniously shoved into adjacent valleys, filling the valleys. If we scale this earth moving to the world as a whole, the total earth moved by humans is estimated to be 30 to 35 Gt every year. For comparison, meandering rivers may shift 25 to 40 Gt of sediment from one side of the river to the other during a year, and other geomorphic processes move much less material (Table 1). Table 1. Estimates of rates of geomorphic activity by various agents. RIVERS Delivery to oceans 24 Meandering 25-40 GLACIERS At present 4.3 Pleistocene 10 AGENT MASS OF EARTH MOVED WIND 1 WAVE ACTION 1 SLOPE PROCESSES 0.6 Gt/y in Agriculture About 3500 Gt of soil are moved annually in plowing. Most of this, however, is simply transferred from furrows to ridges, and is then washed back to fill the furrows; no permanent landform is created. On the other hand, about 75 Gt/y is actually eroded from the plowed fields by wind and water. Most of this is deposited only a short distance from the field on slopes and in floodplains, but up to 10 Gt/y may be transported all the way to the oceans. One ecologist estimated that soil was being removed from farm fields at 17 times the rate at which it is being formed by weathering processes, an estimate that does not bode well for the long term viability of the world's food supply. Earth Moving Selected References Hooke, R. LeB., 1994, On the efficacy of humans as geomorphic agents: GSA Today, v. 4, No. 9, p. 217, 224-225. Hooke, R.LeB., 1999, Spatial distribution of human geomorphic activity in the United States: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, v. 24, p. 687-692. Hooke, R.LeB., 2000, On the history of humans as geomorphic agents: Geology, v. 28, p. 843-846. Wilkinson, B.H., 2005, Humans as geologic agents: A deep-time perspective. Geology, v. 33(3), p. 161-164. Wilkinson, B.H. and McElroy, B.J., 2007, The impact of humans on continental erosion and sedimentation. Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 119(1), p. 140-156. Deep time To examine sediment fluxes over a still longer time, Bruce Wilkinson has estimated sediment fluxes to the oceans over the past 500 million years by looking at the volume of sedimentary rock preserved in the geologic record (Fig. 5). The present is an unusual time in Earth's history. History of human earth moving Of course humans have not always been such prolific earth movers. The earliest archeological record of humans earth moving is from 40,000 years ago when Homo erectus was making sizable seasonal dwellings with walls supported by boulders moved into place for the purpose. Thereafter, milestones in the motivation and ability of humans to move earth occurred in the Mesolithic, about 7000 B.C., when the hunter-gatherer way of life gave way to farming and village life; about 3000 B.C. and 1500 B.C. at the beginning of the Bronze and the Iron ages, respectively, when the desire for minerals led to expanded mining, and metal tools facilitated earth-moving activities; about 1800 A.D. when steam power and the Industrial Revolution led to a need for coal and at the same time provided machinery for mining coal and other earth-moving endeavors, and finally in the early 1900s when the internal combustion engine eventually led to the humongous excavators of today, some of which can pick up 30 tons at a swipe (Figs. 2 and 3). When the curve in Figure 3 is multiplied by the population at various times in the past, the explosion in human earth moving in the last century is staggering (Fig. 4). Years before present E a r t h
m o v e d
b y
h u m a n s
( G t / y r ) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Unintentional (agriculture) Intentional 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 80 as a function of time. (After Hooke, 2000) Figure 4. Estimate of total mass of earth moved by humans 5000 4000 3000 2000 000 0 40 30 20 10 Easter Island World today USA today Pyramid of Cheops Rome London Copan E a r t h
m o v e d
p e r
c a p i t a
( t / y r ) Years before present Figure 2. Figure 2. This excavator can load a 70 m 3 truck in 5 scoops. (Photo courtesy of Douglas Jacobson). Figure 3. Estimates of the mass of earth moved per capita at various times in the past (After Hooke, 2000). L C m M C m U C m O r S i L D v M D v U D v L C b U C b L P m U P m L T r M T r U T r L J r M J r U J r L K t U K t T p a T e o T o l T m i T P I T o d a y 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Lower Cambrian (LCm) to today. (Wilkinson and McElroy, 2007) Figure 5. Continental erosion rates over geologic time from the
Impact of clay mining on the ground water regime in parts of
Thiruvananthapuram district, Kerala
Mini Chandran1, T. S. Anitha Shyam1, P
. Nandakumaran1, E. Shaji2
1Central Ground Water Board, Kerala Region
Marine Sand Resources off Kerala Coast visàvis Acute
Shortage of Construction Sand in the State of Kerala
A C Dinesh1, P Praveen Kumar2, N M Shareef2 & C Jayaprakash3
Marine & Coastal Survey Division, Geological Survey of India
Sedimentological studies of beach sand of Tamil Nadu
and Kerala coast, India – Implications on provenance
and depositional environments
D Senthil Nathan & B S Bijilal
Department of Earth Sciences, SPCAS, Pondicherry University
Application of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility in
deformed rocks and associated intrusives from
Erattupetta, Madurai block, south India
R S Prasanth, P Pratheesh and R B Binoj Kumar
Department of Geology, University of Kerala
Impacts of Brick and Tile Clay Mining From The Wetlands of Periyar River Basin, Kerala, India K A Aswathy, Shiekha E John, K Maya and D Padmalal Centre For Earth Science Studies, Thiruvananthapuram
IMPACT OF RIVER SAND MINING ON THE GROUNDWATER
REGIME IN KERALA– AN OVERVIEW
P Nandakumaran, T. S. Anitha Shyam, Mini Chandran,
V
. R. Rani, G. Srinath & A. D. Anil Chand
Central Ground Water Board, Kerala Region
Environmental Effects of River Sand Mining: A Case Study of Periyar River, Kerala, Southwest India Shiekha E John, K Maya and D Padmalal Centre For Earth Science Studies, Trivandrum
Exploration for china clay in Kadayattu, Puthiyaveedu
Padinjattumbhagom, and Kanjirakode area of Mulavana
village, Kollam district, Kerala
Sughada Pradeep and K N Raman Nampoothiri
Directorate of Mining and Geology
Kerala
An Overview of Primary, Supergene and Placer Gold Occurrences of Wayanad-Nilambur Granulitic Terrain, South India Prabhakar Sangurmath The Hutti Gold Mine Company LTD
Exploration For China Clay in and Around Mangalapuram, Thiruvananthapuram District, Kerala A Prabhakumar and Sughada Pradeep Directorate of Mining and Geology
Moeller Mary Pat 2000 Early Intervention and Language Development in Children Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing PEDIATRICS Vol. 106 No. 3 September 2000