You are on page 1of 6

MORE ON Predictions

30 June 2014
5 Comments


Q: You know, Esteemed Committee, what people really want, is to insert new information and new
ideas into the current environment.
C: Yes.

Q: Many people want proof.
C: Without examining what proof is acceptable.

Q: People always know what is acceptable.
C: Only if they know everything, and as you know, this is not possible.

Q: God knows everything, correct?
C: If God were a person or single soul, no. God is collective and as much as can be known to come
close to everything, this collective can achieve it. The word "everything" assumes no new things come to
be; your individual and collective power of creation assures that knowledge of everything is unattainable.
Creation will always lead knowledge, never follow.

Q: So how does this idea of proof hold so much water?
C: How does the idea of motherhood do the same? If offspring of humans were nurtured away from
their biological mothers, a society could grow and prosper and it would occur in a new way. This notion
seems horrible to most humans, even to mothers who would abandon their offspring. Yet humanity has
often done so, and continues. The results are good; children raised by a group of people to whom they are
unrelated biologically prosper equally well. It is seen as the exception, caused by circumstances; the vast
majority of humanity sees not the choice the child makes, only the unfortunate situation that supplies the
opportunity.

So you see, we hope, how the idea of motherhood holds strong and other ideas, of acceptability of proof,
also. Despite limitations.

Q: Limitations of?
C: Proof and understanding.

Q: Why cant proof for every doubt be supplied?
C: The clarification often will be rejected; there is strength in doubt. As you know, criticism supplies
power by and from those criticized, to the critics. Insistence upon doubt and preponderance of skepticism
are sources of strength in the face of misunderstanding, to the confused.

Q: What calms doubt?
C: Acceptance of not knowing, similar to appreciation, as acceptance lifts well being. The
circumstances of any human can quickly be divided in half, what is good and what is otherwise. It is easy
to take for granted what is good, placing most attention on what is less so. This is a choice, and need not
follow such route. It is a simple matter to train oneself to appreciate the good; one technique is to look
around and observe s/he who has not, what one assumes one shall always have. If you can walk, look at
the person in the wheelchair. If you can see, consider a day of blindness. If you can urinate or defecate
without problems, think about a person with a colostomy.

Accept what you do not know, when and as it appears. This will always happen and as you know, occurs
continuously. All of you encounter new situations; learn and inquire, be not automatically skeptical as
many have learned to do.

Q: OK, let's get to the title of the post, predictions continued. You all supplied a few, or as we'd say
locally to me, y'all did, a while back. What new predictions can you provide? Absent proof?
C: We struggle with the idea of prediction, as it too easily absolves humanity of choice. There is
deep love, desire and affection for enslavement of ideas; it is learned to be easy and pleasant. Confusion is
a difficult thing to endure, and is avoided. Suggestions of new ideas, comments and views which do not
match preferences and knowledge already installed in the listener have been learned to be shouted down.
This is an outgrowth of choice avoidance, itself a result of unpleasantry. Blame for bad outcomes is
powerful, so much so that many humans choose blame over resolution.

Q: So we can't have predictions because.?
C: The decisions have not been made. The course of events has, but there is a selection always
available. Simultaneous occurrence artificially separated then imposed upon a line or sequence creates the
notion of prediction.

Q: There are psychics and mediums with good track records making predictions.
C: We suggest not that predictions cannot be made; some outcomes are certain, the decision to do
them without hesitation already set. We say, the accuracy of the medium is the selection of the guides
choosing to supply the information. We assure you, no medium can predict with accuracy in every case,
humanity does not work that way.

Q: How do psychics and mediums have good hit percentages?
C: They only supply predictions highly likely to occur. Press for answers not yet chosen, and the
accuracy will fall. It would default to that of what humans call a coin toss; 50/50.

Q: But when something happens, it is a certainty. History, for example?
C: History is the timeline illusion observed in a certain order. This is like electricity, which flows
away from you or towards you. Choose your place and see the ordering reversed. History is the product of
Earth timelines arranged in the order of numbers. It is possible to count backwards; it is possible to replay
music, sound or video in reverse. History also, yet not on Earth.

Q: How many alternative courses of events can there be?
C: As many as are wished to be created.

Q: Some predictions about society are certain.
C: No, nothing is absolute. For any small absoluteness to be possible, there must be a restriction in
choice and will. This is not the way of the universe. There cannot be a restriction of freedom and choice;
this is not possible. It is an illusion of circumstance created, the reason for society on Earth.

Q: Who created society on Earth, anyway?
C: All of you who choose to participate. Like a club, a group or a society, the membership creates by
agreement.

Q: Human form, presence, life and events are all pure creation ofwhom?
C: All of you.

Q: The idea God created the Heavens and Earth, yada yada yadanot true?
C: Human society on Earth is optional; Earth existed before humans chose to exist upon it. Remember,
off Earth, there is no time and no time line. There is synchronicity and pattern; course and intersection.
All things circulate and can rendezvous as chosen, freely. Human existence on Earth is a simultaneous
creation, events of which can be changed.

Q: Is this what is meant by time travel?
C: Yes; we suggest computer code. The operation follows a sequence; insert a new command or
function, a new routine within and the application will run differently or not at all, to its original purpose.
Humanity, far more complex, follows a conceptual pattern no different.

To travel in time is simply a choice to view a different section of code.

Q: We just love predictions, however. We want to know what will happen.
C: How much choice do you wish to abdicate? For we say, you cannot. The ability to know represents
great power in the illusion of humanity. Enter a new illusion and this power translates not, carries over
little.

Q: Still, once something has happened, it's a certainty of history.
C: Of the sequence you chose to see. This does not mean there are no other sequences. The moon
and sun do not cease to exist after disappearing below the horizon; a synchronous satellite still exists
when invisible, in orbit above a spot opposite your place on your planet's surface.

Q: So why can't we know when we'll die?
C: You will die at the end of your life.

Q: When will that be?
C: When you chose.

Q: Why can I not know now?
C: You will change the course of your life; assume not that such choice automatically and naturally
excludes the inability to choose. The illusion of inability is also a selection. You choose to feel unable to
select. This is among Earth's greatest sensations. Supplying certain information, with belief, undermines
this. Why?

Q: Because many of us want it!
C: Why? You want to know the future, why? What will this information do for you, that you do not
already have? We suggest execution; it is considered torture to know death will come, with certainty of
method but not when. If this uncertainty is deemed better by those who would condemn others to death as
punishment, then consistency requires uncertainty for the positive, also. The wonderful thing that would
come. We anticipate the argument that the wonderful thing cannot be known in the same way the horrid
outcome can be imposed. Are you all convinced of this?

We shall predict a wonderful thing guaranteed to come in your life, for all of you, with absolute certainty:
death. This is your return home, a moment of joy and tranquility and peace you long for and rarely
achieve on Earth.

Q: I know, you've said many times, if we knew, we'd always pursue the good and avoid the bad.
C: Yes, this is step one in the human journey. Step two includes both; if there were no good, no
pursuit of it would be undertaken. The most horrible of lives contains much good and memory of it. As an
animal would instinctively smell and be drawn to food, each human will be drawn to the good in life, as
s/he perceives it. Little instinct operates in human society, to allow for a great breadth of learning and
response based upon it.

The contrasts of life create experience. You would avoid the bad if you knew of it, and so hypocritical
would we be, to only offer good news. This robs you of experience; would you thieves of us make?

Q: OK, how about bad newscan we have some of both?
C: We predict all world leaders shall die, some violently.

Q: When?!? Which ones?
C: Several, each at the end of his or her life. This will happen to all humans, the leaders are not
unique. We predict some humans will die by gunfire, directed at them by other humans, in anger.

Q: Unfortunately, that's true also.
C: Many less can die this way; the choice to not do so lies with the murderer in many a case. The
victims, by ignorance of the risk, danger or a life choice, have no active, human life choice they can see.
Killers have this choice completely. Why will some act in this horrible way? We predict some will.

Daily.

Q: Why can't true victims, who have not chosen a violent death, be warned to avoid it?
C: Some are, and do. This is not news; so society does not publicize this. Little reward for avoidance
exists, no thirst for examples of prudence overwhelms.

There remains nearly complete control in the hands of humans to do no harm, even among the ones who
do it to the greatest extent. This choice is never removed. The desire to hurt, damage and kill is an active
choice.

Q: There are some cases of bad things planned by both perpetrator and victim?
C: Yes.

Q: Why?
C: The sensation of the experience and often, for the benefit of the observers.

Q: How about good things?
C: The sensation of the experience and often, the benefit of the observers, apply also.

Q: Are you saying we choose all the bad things that happen?
C: Yes, entirely, either before incarnation and sometimes after it.

Q: Are the things that humanity considers bad, all around, are they also seen this way in Heaven?
C: No; they supply contrast and perspective.

Q: We dont need to see dead trees to like the beautiful, green and lush ones.
C: Yes, you certainly do. All trees die; beauty among them is appreciated by the automatic knowledge
the tree is not permanent.

Q: So what is permanent?
C: Your soul and Heaven.

Q: So, not even a winning lottery number prediction?
C: Six, four, twelve and twenty two, forty eight and fifty two.

Q: For what date and lottery, where?
C: This number has won and will do so again. The intended winner will have such date and place
coordinated.

Q: Arent there any random winners?
C: Of course.

Q: How can we know or tell the difference?
C: You cannot generally and if this certainty of information is provided, for example through a
medium, there will be more skeptics than believers; this is why you travel to Earth and journey through
life. The value of skepticism cannot be described; the absolute belief in the wrongness of information that
either does not fit the database values, by contradiction or exclusion, is one main reason life on Earth is
attractive. It offers an appealing contrast, the many of you believe certain with all your might. The Earth
is flat, the stars require fifty thousand Earth years to reach and lead will become gold, these are current
and former beliefs held tightly. We will say, the fifty thousand light year star is reached in under two
hours of Earth time less than one twelfth of a rotation and lead can indeed be made into gold. The
flatness issue is already answered.

Q: How can lead be turned into gold?
C: Re-arrange the molecular structure; the arrangement is already known to humanity, if not the
proportions or properties of the sub-atomic particles. At the level of frequency your home offers, this is
done nearly instantly. We shall offer, if this technology were available on Earth, gold would lose value
quickly. As occurred with aluminum. There is much gold on Earth, deep within the planet. Sufficient that
it would become nearly worthless by comparison.

Q: Can we have just a little prediction that will fascinate a few?
C: Define fascination.

Q: The winner of the World Cup.
C: This is not yet decided; alternatives for all participants winning already exist; if we suggest an
outcome, there is no ability that we can force players to win or lose, to achieve our prediction. We do not
have this power.

Q: Surely the players have decided collectively?
C: Yes, of each team. All offer a winning outcome, and a losing one. Who are we to reveal each,
when the choice will be made after these words are written?

Q: We adore this idea that a higher power and force already knows or decides for us.
C: Yes, absolution it offers, yet ownership of outcome is also lost. Do you only wish to own the
positive, yet place ownership of the negative elsewhere? This inconsistency, so popular on Earth, is also
not possible. You are the higher power of yourself, but for your choice to see and believe otherwise,
temporarily. To be subject to one's decisions without knowledge of them as chosen this way, provides
what no existence in Heaven can give. For many souls, it represents a challenge insurmountable, for it
requires a deep dive into the unknown. You descend deep below the surface of life because you know,
before submerging, you are assured a return well and happy, to your home. You forget after the
experience envelops you, as you choose. All who doubt this chose the doubt; there are no exceptions. The
illusion of exception is another great opportunity of Earth.

Admire you we do, you who take this plunge. We have ourselves, some of us. Our admiration only grows.

Q: Esteemed Committee, have we not gone on too long?
C: If time is important, you may see this aspect. We do not.

Q: Until the next subject, then!
C: Yes, until. Return soon.
Comments
Cheryl 06/30/2014 6:13pm
Thank you Patrick and the Committee for an interesting interview...LOL...ok maybe it was a little frustrating as I too wanted to hear
of a "prediction" but I understand what was meant by the answers! Thank you for enlightening us! :)

Renie 07/01/2014 12:31pm
Wow! Great interview! Really puts the negative side of life into perspective...as well as how we place a value on what we choose to
see as worthy. When it comes down to it, all we really need to know about our "future" is that we will, indeed, return to our home,
well and happy! Thank you dear Committee (and Patrick) for this awesome and uplifting message!

Chris 07/01/2014 4:25pm
Awesome as always. I wrote down the friggin' lottery numbers. And the prediction about death made me laugh like a fool. Just so
you know, I have The Amendment bookmarked on my browser. I love reading your channeling sessions! I'm the person that asked
you to do Groucho Marx awhile back. I don't know if you follow Bashar or Kryon but those channelings are awesome too. I try to do
it myself and am not sure which answers are from my subconscious and which are my guides. Thank you so much as always and if
you like rock music of different sorts, feel free to listen to my songs on my Soundcloud website that I listed in the "Website" section.
There's a lot of reference to my spiritual knowledge in my lyrics.
Best,
Chris

Mike 07/02/2014 3:10am
Here is an excellent article titled:

Whats Wrong With Science?

http://www.spiritoday.com/how-enhanced-physics-supports-survival-after-death/#more-5656

Mike Thomson 07/02/2014 8:27pm
That totally blew my mind. Thanks Committee. Thanks Patrick.

You might also like