Substituting dietary monounsaturated fat for saturated fat is associated with increased daily physical activity and resting energy expenditure. The replacement of dietary PA with OA was associated with increased physical activity and REE.
Substituting dietary monounsaturated fat for saturated fat is associated with increased daily physical activity and resting energy expenditure. The replacement of dietary PA with OA was associated with increased physical activity and REE.
Substituting dietary monounsaturated fat for saturated fat is associated with increased daily physical activity and resting energy expenditure. The replacement of dietary PA with OA was associated with increased physical activity and REE.
Substituting dietary monounsaturated fat for saturated fat is associated
with increased daily physical activity and resting energy expenditure
and with changes in mood 13 C Lawrence Kien, Janice Y Bunn, Connie L Tompkins, Julie A Dumas, Karen I Crain, David B Ebenstein, Timothy R Koves, and Deborah M Muoio ABSTRACT Background: The Western diet increases risk of metabolic disease. Objective: We determined whether lowering the ratio of saturated fatty acids to monounsaturated fatty acids in the Western diet would affect physical activity and energy expenditure. Design: With the use of a balanced design, 2 cohorts of 18 and 14 young adults were enrolled in separate randomized, double-masked, crossover trials that compared a 3-wk highpalmitic acid diet (HPA; similar to the Western diet fat composition) to a lowpalmitic acid and higholeic acid diet (HOA; similar to the Mediterranean diet fat composition). All foods were provided by the investigators, and the palmitic acid (PA):oleic acid (OA) ratio was manipulated by adding different oil blends to the same foods. In both cohorts, we assessed physical activity (monitored continuously by using accelerometry) and resting energy expenditure (REE). To gain insight into a possible mood disturbance that might explain changes in physical activity, the Prole of Mood States (POMS) was administered in cohort 2. Results: Physical activity was higher during the HOA than during the HPA in 15 of 17 subjects in cohort 1 (P = 0.008) (mean: 12% higher; P = 0.003) and in 12 of 12 subjects in the second, conr- matory cohort (P = 0.005) (mean: 15% higher; P = 0.003). When the HOA was compared with the HPA, REE measured during the fed state was 3% higher for cohort 1 (P ,0.01), and REE was 4.5% higher in the fasted state for cohort 2 (P = 0.04). POMS testing showed that the anger-hostility score was signicantly higher during the HPA (P = 0.007). Conclusions: The replacement of dietary PA with OA was associ- ated with increased physical activity and REE and less anger. Be- sides presumed effects on mitochondrial function (increased REE), the dietary PA:OA ratio appears to affect behavior. The second co- hort was derived from a study that was registered at clinicaltrials. gov as R01DK082803. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:68997. INTRODUCTION During the past several decades the incidences of obesity and associated health problems, such as type 2 diabetes, have greatly increased (1, 2). This obesity epidemic is especially evident in westernized countries where sedentary lifestyles, the over- consumption of calorically dense foods, and a high saturated fat intake impede optimal health (2, 3). Some data have suggested that an excessive energy intake, not abnormally decreased energy expenditure, is the principal cause of the obesity epidemic (1). However, obesity is fundamentally a disorder of energy-balance regulation, and low resting energy expenditure (REE) 4 or sed- entary behavior also can contribute to weight gain (4, 5). Despite considerable industry investment in the formulation of phar- maceutical agents that promote energy wasting, efforts in the development of antiobesity drugs continue to fall short (6). Phys- ical activity still remains the safest and most commonly prescribed means of raising energy expenditure. The 2 most prevalent fatty acids (FAs) in the Western diet are the SFA palmitic acid (PA; 16:0) and the MUFA oleic acid (OA; C18:1), each of which is present in approximately equal amounts as a percentage of dietary energy (SFA: 13.7% energy; MUFA: 11.7%) (7). Although an increased dietary PA:OA ratio has been linked to elevated serum LDL concentrations and ischemic heart disease (8), the widespread and effective use of statin drugs might lessen the concern about lowering SFA intake. However, we have been interested in how SFA compared with MUFA in the diet affects risk of diabetes and obesity (9); our previous studies suggested that lowering the dietary PA:OA ratio increased daily energy requirements for weight maintenance as well as the en- ergy cost of physical activity (10, 11). In this article, we asked whether a shift in the FA composition of the diet might affect physical activity and REE. Dietary FAmay inuence physical activity via effects on mood (eg, anger and hostility) (12), but a meta-analysis has also shown that low-intensity exercise improves the self-rated effect (13). 1 Fromthe Departments of Pediatrics (CLK), Medicine (CLK, KIC, and DBE), Medical Biostatistics (JYB), Rehabilitation and Movement Sciences (CLT), and Psychiatry (JAD), University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, and the Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology & Cancer Biology, Sarah W Stedman Nutrition and Metabolism Center, Duke University, Durham, NC (TRK and DMM). 2 This study was supported by the NIH (grants R01 DK073284 and R01 DK082803) and conducted at the University of Vermont General Clinical Research Center funded by the National Center for Research Resources, NIH, United States Public Health Service (grant RR00109). 3 Address correspondence to CL Kien, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Room #175A, University of Vermont Colchester Research Facil- ity, 208 South Park Drive, Colchester, VT 05446. E-mail: cl.kien@uvm.edu. 4 Abbreviations used: FA, fatty acid; GCRC, General Clinical Research Center; HOA, higholeic acid diet; HPA, highpalmitic acid diet; OA, oleic acid; PA, palmitic acid; POMS, Prole of Mood States; REE, resting energy expenditure; TMD, total mood disturbance. ReceivedSeptember 24, 2012. Accepted for publication January 15, 2013. First published online February 27, 2013; doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.051730. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:68997. Printed in USA. 2013 American Society for Nutrition 689
b y
g u e s t
o n
S e p t e m b e r
1 3 ,
2 0 1 4 a j c n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
b y
g u e s t
o n
S e p t e m b e r
1 3 ,
2 0 1 4 a j c n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
b y
g u e s t
o n
S e p t e m b e r
1 3 ,
2 0 1 4 a j c n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
b y
g u e s t
o n
S e p t e m b e r
1 3 ,
2 0 1 4 a j c n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
b y
g u e s t
o n
S e p t e m b e r
1 3 ,
2 0 1 4 a j c n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
b y
g u e s t
o n
S e p t e m b e r
1 3 ,
2 0 1 4 a j c n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
b y
g u e s t
o n
S e p t e m b e r
1 3 ,
2 0 1 4 a j c n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
b y
g u e s t
o n
S e p t e m b e r
1 3 ,
2 0 1 4 a j c n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
b y
g u e s t
o n
S e p t e m b e r
1 3 ,
2 0 1 4 a j c n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
b y
g u e s t
o n
S e p t e m b e r
1 3 ,
2 0 1 4 a j c n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
b y
g u e s t
o n
S e p t e m b e r
1 3 ,
2 0 1 4 a j c n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
b y
g u e s t
o n
S e p t e m b e r
1 3 ,
2 0 1 4 a j c n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
b y
g u e s t
o n
S e p t e m b e r
1 3 ,
2 0 1 4 a j c n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
Thus, we examined the relation between dietary FA, physical activity behavior, and mood. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Subjects, screening, and overall design Two cohorts of adult volunteers were derived from 2 separate, double-masked, crossover trials that used an identical dietary protocol for the determination of effects of changes in the dietary PA:OA ratio. Each study (cohorts 1 and 2) used a crossover design; subjects were randomly assigned into 2 groups that differed with respect to the treatment order; the trial lasted for 2 treatment periods. For cohort 1, the rst volunteer began the study on 30 August 2007; therefore, the study was not registered as a clinical trial. However, cohort 2 was derived from a study that was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as R01DK082803. The procedures followed for the 2 clinical studies were in accordance with the ethical standards of the relevant institutional committees. Cohort 1 consisted of healthy, sedentary, nonobese healthy men (n = 9) and women (n = 9) aged 1840 y. Some salient characteristics of these subjects are shown in Table 1. Exclusion criteria included prescription medication, regular aerobic exercise training, dyslipidemia (14), evidence of type 2 diabetes (15), and women with abnormal ovulation. In addition, subjects were excluded who manifested an abnormally high value (.4.65) for the HOMA-IR (16). Subjects in cohort 1 participated in a trial in which comprehensive transcriptional and metabolomic proling was used to assess the effects of dietary FA composition on metabolic outcomes, such as insulin sensitivity (17). To conrm results from the rst cohort, we used data collected fromcohort 2 (Table 1). This cohort was comprised of 12 subjects (6 men and 6 women) with physical activity measurements; in one of these subjects, REE was not measured because of technical issues. Mood data were collected for the last 10 subjects studied. We were able to study mood only in 2 additional subjects (for a total of 6 men and 6 women with mood data). Thus, a total of 14 individual subjects contributed to data on physical activity, mood, and/or REE for cohort 2. The recruitment strategy for cohort 2 was identical to that for cohort 1, except for 2 factors. First, in contrast to in cohort 1, we allowed women in cohort 2 who were receiving hormonal con- traception. Second, subjects were recruited in 2 ranges of BMI (in kg/m 2 ) of 1825 and $30. However, after an initial clinical evaluation, we evaluated body composition during screening in 2 male subjects with respective BMIs of 31.7 and 27.0; these men were reassigned respectively to the lean and obese categories after their BMI was corrected for an empirical relation between BMI and percentage of body fat (18). On this basis, there were 2 of 6 men and 2 of 6 women who were judged to be obese. Cohort 2 participated in a trial designed in part to investigate how dietary FA composition affects palmitate metabolism. Diets Detailed screening of cohort 1 indicated a habitual intake of 37% of kilocalories from total fat, 14.5% of kilocalories from TABLE 1 Demographic and metabolic characteristics 1 Cohort 1 Cohort 2 M W Lean M Obese M Lean W Obese W Age (y) 28.9 6 2.5 30.0 6 2.2 30.5 6 2.8 38.0 6 0.5 24.1 6 1.1 26.8 6 4.6 Body weight (kg) 77.9 6 3.6 66.9 6 4.0 74.9 6 9.6 87.6 6 12.5 61.1 6 2.6 115.7 6 27.8 Height (cm) 180.8 6 2.3 171.1 6 1.3 176.6 6 4.1 174.8 6 8.0 169.0 6 2.1 169.1 6 2.8 BMI (kg/m 2 ) 23.8 6 0.9 22.8 6 1.3 23.7 6 2.2 28.5 6 1.5 2 21.4 6 0.9 40.2 6 8.4 Abdominal circumference (cm) 81.0 6 3.8 80.6 6 3.9 84.3 6 5.1 94.4 6 6.7 76.6 6 2.8 107.8 6 14.2 Body fat (%) 3 17.8 6 2.7 30.6 6 3.1 22.0 6 2.8 32.2 6 0.7 27.3 6 2.2 49.1 6 0.2 FFM (kg) 64.4 6 3.0 46.5 6 1.5 59.5 6 7.8 59.4 6 8.2 44.5 6 1.8 59.5 6 13.9 TC (mmol/L) 3.7 6 0.2 3.9 6 0.3 4.9 6 0.2 5.1 6 0.0 4.3 6 0.5 5.0 6 0.8 LDL (mmol/L) 2.1 6 0.2 2.0 6 0.2 2.8 6 0.2 3.2 6 0.2 2.3 6 0.5 3.3 6 0.7 HDL (mmol/L) 1.3 6 0.1 1.6 6 0.1 1.7 6 0.2 1.1 6 0.2 1.7 6 0.3 1.1 6 0.0 LDL:HDL ratio 1.7 6 0.3 1.2 6 0.1 1.7 6 0.2 3.0 6 0.5 1.6 6 0.5 3.1 6 0.6 TAG (mmol/L) 0.6 6 0.1 0.6 6 0.1 0.8 6 0.1 1.6 6 0.9 0.8 6 0.1 1.4 6 0.3 Fasting insulin (pmol/L) 18.9 6 3.6 24.2 6 5.1 27.1 6 4.7 53.8 6 24.0 26.0 6 2.3 87.5 6 6.3 Fasting glucose (mmol/L) 4.4 6 0.1 4.3 6 0.1 4.5 6 0.2 4.9 6 0.2 4.2 6 0.1 4.3 6 0.0 HOMA-IR 0.5 6 0.1 0.7 6 0.2 0.8 6 0.2 1.6 6 0.7 0.7 6 0.1 2.4 6 0.2 ALT (U/L) 30.4 6 5.3 22.6 6 1.5 29.8 6 3.2 33.0 6 2.0 24.8 6 6.5 29.0 6 2.0 Hemoglobin (g/dL) 14.4 6 0.4 12.8 6 0.5 14.9 6 0.1 14.2 6 0.4 12.6 6 0.2 13.1 6 0.3 NEFAs (mmol/L) 0.4 6 0.1 0.3 6 0.1 ND ND ND ND 1 All values are means 6 SEMs. n = 18 in cohort 1 and n = 14 in cohort 2 (includes subjects with physical activity, Prole of Mood States, or resting energy-expenditure data presented in Results and described in Subjects and Methods). There were 2 obese men and 2 obese women in cohort 2. ALT, serum concentration of alanine aminotransferase; FFM, fat-free mass; HDL, serum concentration of HDL cholesterol; LDL, serum concentration of LDL cholesterol; ND, nondetermined; NEFA, nonesteried fatty acid; TAG, serum concentration of triacylglycerol (triglycerides); TC, serum total cholesterol concentration. 2 See Subjects and Methods for an explanation of why one man with BMI (in kg/m 2 ) .25 but ,30 was included in our obese group because his percentage of body fat was exceptionally high for his BMI. 3 Data were obtained at the time of screening except for the percentage of body fat, FFM, and NEFAs, which were obtained at the end of the 1-wk baseline diet. 690 KIEN ET AL
b y
g u e s t
o n
S e p t e m b e r
1 3 ,
2 0 1 4 a j c n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
saturated fat, and 12% of kilocalories from monounsaturated fat, which was consistent with the usual American diet (7). The habitual diet of cohort 2 was similar at 35.8%of kilocalories from total fat, 12.0% of kilocalories from saturated fat, and 13.0% of kilocalories from monounsaturated fat. All subjects in both co- horts ingested solid-food diets until after completion of physical activity measurements (as well as mood assessment in cohort 2). All foods and beverages, except water, were provided to subjects at an energy intake sufcient to maintain body weight. After screening, a low-fat and low-PA baseline-control diet was fed for 7 d (protein: 19.7% of kilocalories; carbohydrate: 51.6% of ki- localories; fat: 28.4% of kilocalories; PA: 5.3% of kilocalories; and OA: 15.9% of kilocalories) (14). Subjects participated in a crossover study of 3-wk diet periods (separated by another 1 wk of the control diet) that consisted of a diet that resembled the habitual diet and was a highpalmitic acid diet (HPA; similar to Western diet fat composition) (fat: 40.4% of kilocalories; PA: 16.0% of kilocalories; and OA: 16.2% of kilocalories) or a low- PA and higholeic acid diet (HOA; similar to the Mediterranean diet fat composition) (fat: 40.1% of kilocalories; PA: 2.4% of kilocalories; and OA: 28.8% of kilocalories) (Table 2). For all 3 diets, the FA composition was varied by adding oil blends to the 6 precisely formulated meals that composed the control diet and the 9 meals that composed experimental diets. Foods, including chicken and turkey (the only sources of meat), were all very low in fat. Thus, FAs were mainly provided by vegetable-oil blends appropriate to each diet (Natural Oils In- ternational Inc). The HPA and HOA otherwise contained the exact same foods with a 3-d rotating menu. These oils, at roomtemperature, were mixed with foods that had been warmed; thus, these oils were not used for cooking. The oil blend for the control diet consisted of palm oil (36.9%), high-oleic sunower oil (19.3%), and hazelnut oil (43.8%). The HPA oil blend consisted of palm oil (89%), peanut oil (6.75%), and virgin olive oil (4.25%), and the HOA blend consisted only of hazelnut oil. Except for the virgin olive oil used only in the HPA, all natural oils were rst extracted (eg, centrifugation) and rened [alkaline rening (crude oil treated with alkali to separate impurities from triglycerides) and ltering to remove impurities such as seed fragments]. The HOA and HPA had identical, low glycemic loads (10.7; average of 3 d of menus) (19, 20). Diets were prescribed in a random order, stratied by sex, and separated by a 1-wk period of the baseline-control diet. All foods and drinks, except water, were provided by the General Clinical Research Center (GCRC), and body-energy balances were main- tained throughout the study as previously described (21). For cohort 1, 10 of 17 subjects ingested the HPA rst, and in cohort 2, equal numbers of subjects ingested the HPA or HOA rst. Thus, boredom or fatigue from the study was not weighted toward the HPAbecause fewer subjects in the combined cohorts ingested the HPA last. However, the diet order was considered in the statistical analysis. Subjects in the rst cohort ate breakfast in the GCRC from Sunday to Friday, but most subjects chose to eat their 2 remaining meals each day at home. Subjects in the second cohort ate breakfast in the GCRC from Monday to Friday and at home on Saturday and Sunday. Each meal was packaged and ready to be reheated by using either an oven or microwave. Because the foods, themselves, were practically devoid of fat, subjects also were given containers of oil to add to each meal after it had been reheated. Subjects also were given instructions regarding convenient ways to add the oils to various food items on the menu. Each day, subjects completed and signed a questionnaire that attested to their having eaten all of the food (and food oil) and to not having consumed any food or drink, except water, not on the menu. On Sunday (cohort 1) or Monday (cohort 2), volunteers completed questionnaires pertaining to the previous 1 or 2 d. All food and oil containers were inspected each day to be sure all food and oil was consumed. Subjects were given instructions to use spatulas that were provided to help scrape all oil from its container but, ultimately, were instructed to lick the oil container to nally empty it. Occasionally, there was evidence of incomplete food or oil consumption or a subject would admit to the ingestion, usually inadvertently, of, eg, a cookie or mint. However, any consistent noncompliance was grounds for removal from the study. Fortu- nately, only one subject left the study on day 3 because of an aversion to the food (ie, a dislike of fat-free cottage cheese). Because completely following the diet was a dichotomous issue, and subjects were queried each day about this, we did not use a detailed diet history during the study. Because the food was provided ready to eat to subjects, except for the reheating of the nonfat component, and food and oil containers were returned for daily inspection, there was no need to use photography, eg, to showwhat food was offered to the subject or was not eaten. For the rst cohort, the average number of days when food was returned during the HPA and HOA was 1.33 and 1.67 d, respectively, and the average daily consumption of oil for the HPA and HOA as a percentage of the total oil ad- ministered (127.8 and 127.6 g/d, respectively) was 99.9% and 99.2%, respectively. Assessment of physical activity Because both cohorts participated in studies in which discrete outcomes were being assessed for the entire diet period, we wanted an integrated measurement of physical activity over this TABLE 2 Composition of experimental diets 1 HPA HOA Percentage of kcal Protein 16.8 16.89 Carbohydrate 42.85 43.51 Fat 40.45 40.13 Fatty acid prole (g/100 g) Palmitic 40.29 4.59 Oleic 39.95 74.8 Linoleic 10.37 14.29 Stearic 4.22 2.81 a-Linolenic 0.18 0.14 Myristic 0.97 0 Palmitoleic 0.18 0.12 Eicosapentaenoic 0 0 Docosahexaenoic 0 0 Arachidonic 0 0 Percentage of kcal 12:0 0 0 14:0 0.42 0.05 16:0 16.02 2.37 18:0 1.8 1.27 18:1 16.23 28.75 18:3 0.16 0.19 18:2 4.97 6.36 1 HOA, higholeic acid diet; HPA, highpalmitic acid diet. DIETARY FATTY ACIDS AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY 691
b y
g u e s t
o n
S e p t e m b e r
1 3 ,
2 0 1 4 a j c n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
same period. Thus, data were derived from recordings during days 37 of the control diet and days 221 of each experi- mental diet for cohort 1 and during days 36 of the control diet and days 218 of each experimental diet for cohort 2. For cohort 1, because of the dysfunction of the activity monitor, data presented in this article concern only 8 men. For both cohorts, physical activity (counts $ min 21 $ d 21 ) was assessed daily during nonsleeping hours by using an activity monitor that was worn at the hip (belt at the waist) (ActiGraph GT1M; ActiGraph). The activity monitor is a small, electromechanical device that records acceleration and deceleration of movement. The activity monitor records these accelerations and decelerations as activity counts and provides data for different intensities of physical activity. These counts are linearly related to the intensity of the movement performed by the participant and are summed over a set period of time (epoch). Because activity monitors do not rely on self-report, they provide an objective measure of physical activity, which correlates with total and activity-related energy expenditure measured by using the doubly labeled water tech- nique (22). The reliability of this activity monitor increases when subjects wear them $3 compared with 1 d (23). The reported intradevice and interdevice reliabilities of this activity monitor are 2.9% and 3.5%, with a mechanical shaker used to induce movement (24). The actual use of this particular monitor, which is worn at the hip, has been shown to account for w7679% of the variability in activity-related energy expenditure, which is measured by using a respiratory room calorimeter with positive predictive values for sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous activities of 80%, 66%, 69%, and 74%, respectively (25). With the use of the framework of Treuth et al (26), we also analyzed minutes spent and average physical activity at sedentary, light, or moderate-vigorous physical activity levels (,100, 1012999, and $3000 counts $ min 21 $ d 21 , re- spectively) for cohort 1 only. One of the denitions of the word sedentary is sitting. Because we showed data related to the sedentary range of activity, we note that sedentary activ- ities included resting and watching TV in the research by Treuth et al (26). Indirect calorimetry For cohort 1, on day 20 of each experimental diet period (HPA and HOA), after an evening meal at 1800 (one-third of the daily energy intake), we carried out indirect calorimetry overnight in both fed and fasted states, as previously described (10). Except for bedside bathroom privileges, subjects remained in bed for the duration of the indirect calorimetry study. Measurements of oxygen consumption ( _ VO 2 ), and carbon dioxide production ( _ VCO 2 ) (Vmax SPECTRA 29; Sensor Medics Corp) were used for 20 min each time at 60-min intervals postmeal for 7 h (fed state) (1740, 1900, 2000, 2100, 2200, 2300, 2400, and 0100) and at 120-min intervals until 11 h postmeal (fasted state) (0300 and 0500) (10). Urine was collected during the entire interval, and protein oxidation was estimated from the rate of urea nitrogen for both the fed (17200120) period and the fasted period (01200720) (10). REE and substrate utilization were calculated according to standard procedures by using urine urea nitrogen measurements as estimates of protein oxidation (10, 27, 28) and Weirs equation (29) as follows: Total kilocalories per unit of time eg; REE
3:941 3 _ V O 2
1:106 3 _ V CO 2
22:17 urinary urea nitrogen excretion
For cohort 2, indirect calorimetry in the fed state was carried out on day 21 of each experimental diet as part of a [1- 13 C]-acetate recovery study to correct for labeled carbon dioxide recovery during palmitate tracer studies on the 2 d before the acetate test. The protocol consisted of a 9-h administration (every 20 min) of a liquid diet that was formulated on the basis of either experimental diet (each dose was one-twenty-seventh or 3.7% of the daily energy intake). Fed measurements were obtained at 360 and 420 min after the initiation of feedings; subjects were allowed to rest in bed or sit in a chair between indirect calorimetry measurements, which, however, were conducted in the supine position. One measurement of REE (50 min) in the fasted state was made 10.3 h after the last 20-min dose of formula (05000550). Assessment of mood (cohort 2 only) On day 4 of the control diet and day 12 or 13 of experimental diets, subjects were asked to complete the Prole of Mood States (POMS) (30), which is a self-rating questionnaire. Subscale scores for 5 negative mood states (tension-anxiety, depression-dejection, anger-hostility, fatigue-inertia, and confusion-bewilderment states) and one positive mood state (vigor-activity) were calculated. A total mood disturbance (TMD) score was calculated by subtracting the one positive mood state from the sum of the 5 negative states. Body composition On the rst day of the baseline diet, body composition was assessed by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (GE Lunar Prodigy Densitometer, version 5.6) Metabolite assays The FA composition of serum phospholipids was analyzed by using recently described methods (17, 21). Nonesteried FAs in serum were assessed by using capillary gas chromatographymass spectrometry (31). Serum concentrations of total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triacylglycerols (triglycerides) were measured at the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory at Fletcher Allen Health Care, which is an afliate of the University of Vermont, by using a col- orimetric method (Vitros 5.1 FS Chemistry System; Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics). LDL cholesterol was calculated. The following measurements were also determined at the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory at Fletcher Allen Health Care (methods): serum glucose (by using colorimetric reectance spectrophotometry); insulin (by using a chemiluminescent immunoassay), hemoglobin (by using an automated cell counter), and serum concentrations of alanine aminotransferase (by using rate reectance spectrophotometry). Statistics All data are expressed as means 6 SEMs. Analyses were performed with SAS software (version 9.2; SAS Institute Inc). 692 KIEN ET AL
b y
g u e s t
o n
S e p t e m b e r
1 3 ,
2 0 1 4 a j c n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
Each study (cohorts 1 and 2) used a crossover design; subjects were randomly assigned into 2 groups that differed with respect to treatment order, and the trial lasted for 2 treatment periods. Diet effects were analyzed by using a repeated-measures ANOVA, including sequence and treatment effects, with the baseline value as a covariate. In addition, Wilcoxons signed-rank test was used to examine potential diet-associated increases (de- creases) in variables of interest, without regard to the magnitude of the increase (decrease). RESULTS Body weight For both cohorts, there were no diet effects on body-weight changes during either experimental diet. Serum phosphatidylcholine To determine whether diets provided to subjects had their presumed effects on body lipids, we examined the diet effect on the PA:OAratio for serumphosphatidylcholine in the fasted state. For both cohorts, every subject exhibited a higher PA:OA ratio during the HPA than HOA (P #0.001 for the diet effect by using Wilcoxons signed-rank test for cohorts 1 and 2). In addition, as reported previously (17), in cohort 1, the mean value for the ratio was higher during the HPA than HOA (3.13 6 0.10 compared with 1.49 6 0.08, respectively; P , 0.01); similar results were shown for cohort 2 (3.62 6 0.17 compared with 1.94 6 0.14, respectively; P , 0.0001). Physical activity As an index of physical activity behavior, we monitored physical movement by using accelerometry. Physical activity was signicantly higher during the HOA in 15 or 17 subjects in cohort 1 (P = 0.008) (Figure 1A) and in all subjects in cohort 2 (P = 0.005) (Figure 1B). For cohorts 1 and 2, mean physical activity was 12% (P = 0.01) and 15% (P = 0.003) higher with the HOA than HPA, respectively; differences between means (HOA HPA) for the 2 cohorts were almost identical at 40 and 43 counts $ min 21 $ d 21 , respectively (Figure 2, C and D). As noted in Subjects and Methods, for cohort 1, we explored whether diet affected the amount of time per day spent at dif- ferent levels of physical activity, but no such effect was detected (26). REE For cohort 1, the HOA was associated with a 3% higher av- erage REE measured in the fed state (P ,0.01) (Figure 1E). For cohort 2, there was no diet difference in REE in the fed state (1.3% higher during the HOA), but in the fasted state, REE was 4.5% greater during the HOA (P = 0.04) (Figure 1 F). For the assessment of effects of diets on REE within cohorts, we did not correct for fat-free mass during the diet to avoid bias as a result of possible effects of the diets on body composition (17). However, because, as shown in Figure 1, especially values for REE in the fed state were higher in cohort 2 (daytime mea- surements) than cohort 1 (supine, evening measurements), we compared the 2 cohorts by expressing REE per fat-free mass. On this basis, there was no difference between cohorts in REE in the fasted state or diet change (HOA HPA) in REE during either the fed or fasted state. However, for the fed state, values for cohort 2 were signicantly higher than those for cohort 1 during either the HOA or HPA (P = 0.012 and P ,0.001, respectively). The history and physical examination and laboratory measure- ments used at screening and during the dietary trial did not detect subjects who manifested malabsorption, but we did not collect feces during the 2 diets to quantify the excretion of fat. However, our extensive lipidomic analysis performed in cohort 1 subjects suggested that the diets were well absorbed because the PA and OA content of blood and muscle lipids increased to an extent commensurate with the 3-wk diet and single meals (17). POMS After the results on physical activity from cohort 1 became available, we studied cohort 2 to explore whether the composition of dietary FA might affect mood. Ten of 12 men and women (cohort 2) exhibited a lower anger-hostility score with the HOA (P = 0.005) (Figure 2A). Eight of 12 men and women exhibited a lower TMD score with the HOA (P = 0.06) (Figure 2B). The mean score on the anger-hostility subscale was signicantly lower (P = 0.007) during the HOA than HPA, but there also was a trend for a lower mean TMD score during the HOA (P = 0.096) (Table 3). This study had .80% power to detect a dou- bling of scores for individual scales of the POMS as signicant, with a type I error rate of 5%. We showed no signicant cor- relations between the change in any mood score, including the anger-hostility or TMD score (HOA HPA) and change in physical activity. In addition, there was no correlation between the change in physical activity and any mood score assessed on the baseline diet. DISCUSSION The alteration of the dietary SFA:MUFA ratio in the same individuals affected physical activity and mood and to a mild extent REE also. Our study design could not determine whether these outcomes were primarily determined by increased dietary OA per se or decreased PA. Despite obvious environmental triggers, such as advertising, that promote excessive eating or less physical activity (1, 3234) as well as potentially innate differences in REE (4), cognition also plays a role in behaviors relevant to physical activity and food selection and consumption (35). We showed that 27 of 29 subjects in the 2 cohorts increased their physical activity during the low-SFA diet, which resulted in mean 1215% increases in physical activity compared with the habitual, high-SFA diet. These results seemingly conict with our previous observation that the variation of the dietary PA:OA ratio did not affect physical activity (10). However, in the earlier study, physical activity was monitored for only 1 wk by using the wrist position for the accelerometer, and the dietary FA composition was manipulated by using liquid diets without a crossover design. Although the observed increments in phys- ical activity could have had a substantial effect on energy bal- ance if not compensated by changes in food intake, we observed no signicant changes in body weight (as was our design). Moreover, in our recent article (17), we did not report a corre- lation between diet change in physical activity and change in DIETARY FATTY ACIDS AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY 693
b y
g u e s t
o n
S e p t e m b e r
1 3 ,
2 0 1 4 a j c n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
insulin sensitivity. However, our study pointed to the possibility that dietary SFA compared with MUFA may affect brain func- tion (cognition) because both physical activity behavior and mood were differentially affected by the diets. Apersuasive argument has been made that an excessive dietary energy intake, not physical activity, is a major contributor to obesity (1). However, Levine et al (5) reported that obese compared with nonobese people differed in the time per day that they stood compared with sat, and these posture differences may affect mortality risk (36). Although there is no clear evidence that the intake of either total FA or SFA has been temporally asso- ciated with the epidemic of obesity, the latter is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes (37). Although more than one-half of Americans ingest more SFA than has been recommended for optimal health (7), more physically t individuals tend to eat lower amounts of SFA (38). In the current study, we showed that, in 2 separate cohorts, the lowering of the PA:OA ratio of the diet caused modest increases in REE, but the effect was detected only under conditions when subjects rested quietly in bed (fed state in cohort 1 and fasted state in cohort 2). We also acknowledge that, in our previous, parallel-group trial, there was no trend toward a diet- induced difference (10). Both these previous data (10) and the differing effects of the diets on REE in the 2 cohorts of the current study emphasized that interindividual variation and differences in FIGURE 1. Physical activity and REE. A and B: Effects of diet condition on individual changes in physical activity during the 2 experimental diets. Diet effects were analyzed by using Wilcoxons signed-rank test in cohorts 1 (n = 17; P = 0. 008) (A) and 2 (n = 12; P = 0.005) (B). Lean subjects are designated by circles, and obese subjects are designated by triangles. Effects of diet condition on average (mean 6 SEM) physical activity were calculated in cohorts 1 (HPA: 327 6 26 counts $ min 21 $ d 21 ; HOA: 367 6 33 counts $ min 21 $ d 21 ) (C) and 2 (HPA: 280 6 36 counts $ min 21 $ d 21 ; HOA: 323 6 38 counts $ min 21 $ d 21 ) (D). Diet effects were analyzed by using a repeated-measures ANOVA, including sequence and treatment effects, with the baseline value as a covariate. Effects of diets on mean (6SEM) REE (kcal/min) in the fasted and fed state were calculated in cohorts 1 (n = 18; HPA: fasted, 1.05 60.03 kcal/min; fed, 1.22 6 0.04 kcal/min; HOA: fasted, 1.06 6 0.04 kcal/min; fed, 1.25 6 0.04 kcal/min) (E) and 2 (n = 11; HPA: fasted, 1.04 6 0.06 kcal/min; fed, 1.41 60.08 kcal/min; HOA: fasted, 1.09 60.06 kcal/min; fed, 1.43 60.10 kcal/min) (F). * , **Diet effect, *P #0.05, **P #0.01. HOA, higholeic acid diet; HPA, highpalmitic acid diet; REE, resting energy expenditure. 694 KIEN ET AL
b y
g u e s t
o n
S e p t e m b e r
1 3 ,
2 0 1 4 a j c n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
experimental design may alter subtle dietary effects on REE. Because individuals spend w17 h/d eating or within 7 h of eating (the thermic effect of food), the increment in REE with the HOA for cohort 1 accounted for w20 kcal/d. However, the biological relevance of the REE ndings likely relates to a proof of concept that these diets might have subtle differential effects on mitochondrial function because REE was perturbed during strict resting conditions. We reported that the HPA was associ- ated with a higher serum concentration of ceramide (17), and the inhibition of muscle synthesis of ceramide has been associated with decreased REE (39). There is also evidence that OA may increase mitochondrial uncoupling, especially after exercise training (40). It is generally assumed that higher, executive-type brain function mediates the desire to exercise per se (35). In this regard, Sartorius et al (41) recently reported that feeding mice a high-PA diet prevented the stimulation of locomotor activity otherwise caused by the intracerebroventricular application of insulin seen in mice fed a low-PA and high-OA diet. Sartorius et al (41) also studied the effect of diets supplemented with either canola oil (low PA and high OA) or dairy fat (high PA) in humans and showed that the high-PA diet caused a decrease in hippocampal and cortical activity, which was assessed by using functional magnetic resonance imaging techniques. Studies that have used functional magnetic resonance imaging also have shown that patients with metabolic syndrome have an abnormal cerebro- vascular response to a cognitive challenge (42), which implies a link between nutritional status and brain function. Although the progress toward a mechanistic understanding of these ndings will require additional investigation, it is tempting to speculate that the FA composition of the diet might affect neural circuitries that inuence physical activity. Relevant to this hypothesis, changes in the dietary FA composition can affect the lipid composition of the brain, which is accompanied by alterations in signaling and inammation in the hypothalamus (43). Subjects were not told the identity of the 2 study oils, and the investigators were very careful not to know the order of the diets in each subject. Subjects displayed no curiosity about which diet they consumed; anecdotally, when asked, subjects did not seem to know which diet they were ingesting. However, it is possible that physical differences between oils (eg, the melting point) might have altered behavior in some way. Our studies with the use of the POMS instrument were intended to discern if consumption of the HPA was associated with depression or lethargy, which we thought, a priori, might induce sedentary behavior. However, instead, we showed that the anger-hostility score was higher during the HPA, and there was also a trend for an increase in the total mood disturbance during this same diet. At present, we do not know if diet-related effects on mood, in turn, induced changes in physical activity or whether changes in physical activity affected mood, but we showed no correlations between changes in mood scores on the POMS and changes in physical activity. On the basis of the literature, it was plausible that the reduced anger-hostility score with the HOAwas actually a consequence of increased physical activity on that diet; a walking program in female college students was shown to reduce the anger-hostility score measured by using the POMS (44). However, in vitro studies have linked PA (but not OA) to increased secretion of TNF-a (45, 46), and in turn, TNF-a has been linked to feelings of anger and hostility (47, 48). Thus, the cellular PA:OA ratio also may be directly related to feelings of anger because of the secretion of TNF-a by peripheral blood monocytes or, perhaps, synthesis within the brain, which would imply a central inammatory process (43, 49). In conclusion, data from 2 rigorously controlled, crossover studies suggest that lowering the saturated fat content of a typical Western diet by replacing PA with OA increased daily physical activity and REE and also affected mood, particularly anger and hostility. Because posture can contribute to differences in energy expenditure in lean compared with obese adults (5), these results FIGURE 2. Changes in anger-hostility and TMD scores during the HPA and HOA. Diet effects were analyzed by using Wilcoxons signed-rank test. A: Ten of 12 men and women exhibited a lower anger-hostility score with the HOA (P = 0.005). Two pairs of subjects showed identical, anger-hostility scores with both the HPA and HOA (5 and 2 for 2 subjects and 4 and 2 for 2 subjects, respectively), which resulted in 2 pairs of overlapping points. Thus, only 10 distinct data points are visible, although all data points were in- cluded in the statistical analysis. B: Eight of 12 men and women exhibited a lower TMD score with the HOA (P = 0.06). Two subjects (one lean subject and one obese subject) had a score of 10 with the HPA; we labeled this data point for the obese subject. Lean subjects are designated by circles, and obese subjects are designated by triangles. HOA, higholeic acid diet; HPA, highpalmitic acid diet; TMD, total mood disturbance. TABLE 3 Results from the POMS questionnaire 1 HPA HOA P Tension-anxiety 3.1 6 0.7 3.3 6 0.7 0.400 Depression-dejection 4.6 6 1.0 2.7 6 0.5 0.132 Anger-hostility 4.7 6 1.0 2.2 6 0.5 0.007 Fatigue-inertia 5.3 6 1.0 3.7 6 0.9 0.330 Confusion-bewilderment 3.6 6 0.4 2.9 6 0.5 0.441 Vigor-activity 8.2 6 1.1 7.8 6 1.1 0.801 Total mood disturbance 13.1 6 3.2 7.0 6 2.9 0.096 1 All values are means 6 SEMs of POMS raw scores (n = 6 men and n = 6 women). The total mood disturbance score was calculated by subtract- ing the one positive mood state from the sum of the 5 negative states. Diet effects were analyzed by using a repeated-measures ANOVA, including sequence and treatment effects, with the baseline value as a covariate. HOA, higholeic acid diet; HPA, highpalmitic acid diet; POMS, Prole of Mood States. DIETARY FATTY ACIDS AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY 695
b y
g u e s t
o n
S e p t e m b e r
1 3 ,
2 0 1 4 a j c n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
might have relevance to an individuals propensity for weight gain. Our ndings suggest that a high consumption of PA might dampen motivation for physical activity. In the face of envi- ronmental, sociologic, and cultural pressures that discourage obligatory physical activity, even small changes in posture and lifestyle activity could inuence energy balance and body hab- itus. We surmise that studies designed to examine the role of specic dietary FAs in the regulation of physical activity pa- tterns are worthy of additional consideration. Furthermore, we speculate that our studies of physical activity and mood raise the possibility that the type of fat we eat may alter cognitive function. We thank our subjects for their patience and hard work in enduring our rigorous protocols. We also are very grateful to the staff of the University of Vermont General Clinical Research Center for dietary, nursing, and infor- matics support. The authors responsibilities were as followsCLK and DMM: designed the research; CLK, KIC, CLT, DBE, TRK, and DMM: conducted the re- search; JYB: analyzed data; CLK, JYB, CLT, JAD, and DMM: wrote the manuscript; and CLK: had primary responsibility for the nal content of the manuscript. None of the authors had a conict of interest. REFERENCES 1. Swinburn BA, Sacks G, Lo SK, Westerterp KR, Rush EC, Rosenbaum M, Luke A, Schoeller DA, DeLany JP, Butte NF, et al. Estimating the changes in energy ux that characterize the rise in obesity prevalence. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89:17238. 2. Ng SW, Popkin BM. Time use and physical activity: a shift away from movement across the globe. Obes Rev 2012;13:65980. 3. Berglund L, Lefevre M, Ginsberg HN, Kris-Etherton PM, Elmer PJ, Stewart PW, Ershow A, Pearson TA, Dennis BH, Roheim PS, et al. Comparison of monounsaturated fat with carbohydrates as a re- placement for saturated fat in subjects with a high metabolic risk prole: studies in the fasting and postprandial states. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;86:161120. 4. Ravussin E, Lillioja S, Knowler WC, Christin L, Freymond D, Abbott WGH, Boyce V, Howard BV, Bogardus C. Reduced rate of energy expenditure as a risk factor for body-weight gain. N Engl J Med 1988; 318:46772. 5. Levine JA, Lanningham-Foster LM, McCrady SK, Krizan AC, Olson LR, Kane PH, Jensen MD, Clark MM. Interindividual variation in posture allocation: possible role in human obesity. Science 2005;307: 5846. 6. Vetter ML, Faulconbridge LF, Webb VL, Wadden TA. Behavioral and pharmacologic therapies for obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2010;6:578 88. 7. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Adams RJ, Berry JD, Brown TM, Carnethon MR, Dai S, de Simone G, Ford ES, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics2011 update: a report from the American Heart As- sociation. Circulation 2011;123:e18209. 8. Astrup A, Dyerberg J, Elwood P, Hermansen K, Hu FB, Jakobsen MU, Kok FJ, Krauss RM, Lecerf JM, Legrand P, et al. The role of reducing intakes of saturated fat in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: where does the evidence stand in 2010? Am J Clin Nutr 2011;93: 6848. 9. Kien CL. Dietary interventions for metabolic syndrome: role of mod- ifying dietary fats. Curr Diab Rep 2009;9:4350. 10. Kien CL, Bunn JY, Ugrasbul F. Increasing dietary palmitic acid decreases fat oxidation and daily energy expenditure (PMCID: PMC1314972). Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82:3206. 11. Brsheim E, Kien CL, Pearl WM. Differential effects of dietary intake of palmitic acid and oleic acid on oxygen consumption during and after exercise. Metabolism 2006;55:121521. 12. Fontani G, Corradeschi F, Felici A, Alfatti F, Bugarini R, Fiaschi AI, Cerretani D, Montorfano G, Rizzo AM, Berra B. Blood proles, body fat and mood state in healthy subjects on different diets supplemented with Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Eur J Clin Invest 2005;35: 499507. 13. Reed J, Ones DS. The effect of acute aerobic exercise on positive activated affect: a meta-analysis. Psychol Sport Exerc 2006;7:477514. 14. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection. Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001;285:248697. 15. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classication of di- abetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2012;35(suppl 1):S6471. 16. Stern SE, Williams K, Ferrannini E, Defronzo RA, Bogardus C, Stern MP. Identication of individuals with insulin resistance using routine clinical measurements. Diabetes 2005;54:3339. 17. Kien CL, Bunn JY, Poynter ME, Stevens R, Bain J, Ikayeva O, Fukagawa NK, Champagne CM, Crain KI, Koves TR, et al. A lip- idomics analysis of the relationship between dietary fatty acid com- position and insulin sensitivity in young adults. Diabetes (Epub ahead of print 13 December 2012). 18. Gallagher D, Heymseld SB, Heo M, Jebb SA, Murgatroyd PR, Sa- kamoto Y. Healthy percentage body fat ranges: an approach for de- veloping guidelines based on body mass index. Am J Clin Nutr 2000; 72:694701. 19. Louie JC, Flood V, Turner N, Everingham C, Gwynn J. Methodology for adding glycemic index values to 24-hour recalls. Nutrition 2011;27: 5964. 20. Foster-Powell K, Holt SH, Brand-Miller JC. International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002. Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 76:556. 21. Kien CL, Everingham KI, Stevens D, Fukagawa NK, Muoio DM. Short-term effects of dietary fatty acids on muscle lipid composition and serum acylcarnitine prole in human subjects. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2011;19:30511. 22. Ekelund U, Sjostrom M, Yngve A, Poortvliet E, Nilsson A, Froberg K, Wedderkopp N, Westerterp K. Physical activity assessed by activity monitor and doubly labeled water in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001;33:27581. 23. Janz KF, Witt J, Mahoney LT. The stability of childrens physical ac- tivity as measured by accelerometry and self-report. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995;27:132632. 24. Silva P, Mota J, Esliger D, Welk G. Technical reliability assessment of the Actigraph GT1M Accelerometer. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci 2010; 14:7991. 25. Puyau MR, Adolph AL, Vohra FA, Zakeri I, Butte NF. Prediction of activity energy expenditure using accelerometers in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004;36:162531. 26. Treuth MS, Schmitz K, Catellier DJ, McMurray RG, Murray DM, Almeida MJ, Going S, Norman JE, Pate R. Dening accelerometer thresholds for activity intensities in adolescent girls. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004;36:125966. 27. Garrow JS. Energy balance and obesity in man. Amsterdam, Nether- lands: North-Holland Publishing Co, 1974. 28. Frayn KN. Calculation of substrate oxidation rates in vivo from gas- eous exchange. J Appl Physiol 1983;55:62834. 29. Weir JB. New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. J Physiol 1949;109:19. 30. McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF. Prole of Mood State manual (revised). San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1992. 31. Newgard CB, An J, Bain JR, Muehlbauer MJ, Stevens RD, Lien LF, Haqq AM, Shah SH, Arlotto M, Slentz CA, et al. A branched-chain amino acid-related metabolic signature that differentiates obese and lean humans and contributes to insulin resistance. Cell Metab 2009;9: 31126. 32. Ello-Martin JA, Ledikwe JH, Rolls BJ. The inuence of food portion size and energy density on energy intake: implications for weight management. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82:236S41S. 33. Drewnowski A, Specter SE. Poverty and obesity: the role of energy density and energy costs. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;79:616. 34. Hruschka DJ. Do economic constraints on food choice make people fat? A critical review of two hypotheses for the poverty-obesity para- dox. Am J Hum Biol 2012;24:27785. 35. McAuley E, Mullen SP, Szabo AN, White SM, Wojcicki TR, Mailey EL, Gothe NP, Olson EA, Voss M, Erickson K, et al. Self-regulatory processes and exercise adherence in older adults: executive function and self-efcacy effects. Am J Prev Med 2011;41:28490. 696 KIEN ET AL
b y
g u e s t
o n
S e p t e m b e r
1 3 ,
2 0 1 4 a j c n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
36. Katzmarzyk PT, Lee IM. Sedentary behaviour and life expectancy in the USA: a cause-deleted life table analysis. BMJ Open 2012;2: e000828. 37. Salmeron J, Hu FB, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Rimm EB, Willett WC. Dietary fat intake and risk of type 2 diabetes in women. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;73:101926. 38. Brodney S, McPherson RS, Carpenter RS, Welten D, Blair SN. Nu- trient intake of physically t and unt men and women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001;33:45967. 39. Ussher JR, Koves TR, Cadete VJ, Zhang L, Jaswal JS, Swyrd SJ, Lopaschuk DG, Proctor SD, Keung W, Muoio DM, et al. Inhibition of de novo ceramide synthesis reverses diet-induced insulin resistance and enhances whole-body oxygen consumption. Diabetes 2010;59:2453 64. 40. Tonkonogi M, Krook A, Walsh B, Sahlin K. Endurance training in- creases stimulation of uncoupling of skeletal muscle mitochondria in humans by non-esteried fatty acids: an uncoupling-protein-mediated effect? Biochem J 2000;351:80510. 41. Sartorius T, Ketterer C, Kullmann S, Balzer M, Rotermund C, Binder S, Hallschmid M, Machann J, Schick F, Somoza V, et al. Monounsaturated fatty acids prevent the aversive effects of obesity on locomotion, brain activity, and sleep behavior. Diabetes 2012;61:166979. 42. Hoth KF, Gonzales MM, Tarumi T, Miles SC, Tanaka H, Haley AP. Functional MR imaging evidence of altered functional activation in metabolic syndrome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:5417. 43. Cintra DE, Ropelle ER, Moraes JC, Pauli JR, Morari J, Souza CT, Grimaldi R, Stahl M, Carvalheira JB, Saad MJ, et al. Unsaturated fatty acids revert diet-induced hypothalamic inammation in obesity. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e30571. 44. Sakuragi S, Sugiyama Y. Effects of daily walking on subjective symptoms, mood and autonomic nervous function. J Physiol Anthropol 2006;25:2819. 45. Wen H, Gris D, Lei Y, Jha S, Zhang L, Huang MT, Brickey WJ, Ting JP. Fatty acid-induced NLRP3-ASC inammasome activation in- terferes with insulin signaling. Nat Immunol 2011;12:40815. 46. Coll T, Eyre E, Rodriguez-Calvo R, Palomer X, Sanchez RM, Merlos M, Laguna JC, Vazquez-Carrera M. Oleate reverses palmitate-induced insulin resistance and inammation in skeletal muscle cells. J Biol Chem 2008;283:1110716. 47. Suarez EC, Lewis JG, Kuhn C. The relation of aggression, hostility, and anger to lipopolysaccharide-stimulated tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha by blood monocytes from normal men. Brain Behav Immun 2002;16:67584. 48. Lotrich FE, Ferrell RE, Rabinovitz M, Pollock BG. Labile anger during interferon alfa treatment is associated with a polymorphism in tumor necrosis factor alpha. Clin Neuropharmacol 2010;33:1917. 49. Soliman ML, Puig KL, Combs CK, Rosenberger TA. Acetate reduces microglia inammatory signaling in vitro. J Neurochem 2012;123: 55567. DIETARY FATTY ACIDS AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY 697
b y
g u e s t
o n
S e p t e m b e r
1 3 ,
2 0 1 4 a j c n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
Letters to the Editor Vitamin supplements and mortality in older people Dear Sir: Macpherson et al (1) carried out a meta-analysis of multivitamin and multimineral (MVMM) tablet trials and found no effect of MVMMs on average mortality. However, their study may suffer from ecological fallacy. Ecological fallacy means that study-level (group-level) analysis can lead to different conclusions than do corresponding individual-level analyses (2). For this reason, exam- ination of individual-level data is recommended, whenever feasible, to avoid the potential for the ecological fallacy introduced by study- level analyses (2). Macpherson et al (1) calculated that the average age of the par- ticipants in the studies was 62 y. However, ages ranged from 17 to 86 y in the included trials (1). It is probable that the effects of all vitamins and minerals are not identical at the lower and upper ends of such a wide age range. Therefore, pooling diverse trials with young and old people to a single average MVMM effect may cam- ouage effects of some individual vitamins or minerals, for exam- ple, on the oldest people. In the case of vitamin E there is strong empirical evidence of effect modication by age. In an individual-level analysis of the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta- Carotene Cancer Prevention (ATBC) Study data, we found that among participants aged 5062 y at baseline with a dietary vitamin C intake above the median, vitamin E increased mortality by 19% (95% CI: 5%, 35%; based on 1021 deaths). However, among participants aged 6669 y at baseline with a dietary vitamin C intake above the median, vitamin E decreased mortality by 41% (95% CI: 21%, 56%; based on 195 deaths) (3). Furthermore, because the follow-up time in the ATBCStudy was up to 8 y, the participants became substantially older during the trial so that the baseline age was not a proper way to characterize them over the entire follow-up period. Therefore, the modication of vitamin E effects was also analyzed by using the follow-up age as the time vari- able (4). Among 10,837 ATBC Study participants who contributed follow-up time past the age of 65 y, the survival curves of the vitamin E and novitamin E participants signicantly diverged at 71 y. Vita- min E extended life span by ;0.5 y at the upper limit of the follow- up age span (4). Macpherson et al (1) write that in a meta-regression the estimate of the effect of MVMMs was not associated with the duration of supplementation. In the ATBC Study, the harm from vitamin E in the young participants was restricted to the supplementation period after 3.3 y, indicating that there can be a lag period of several years before the effects of some vitamins appear (3). Macpherson et al used the study-level average durations, which provide a poor basis for analyzing supplementation timedependent effect modica- tions. Proper analysis of time-dependent effects requires individual- level data. It is possible that some vitamins and minerals are benecial for specic subpopulations. For example, age, sex, smoking, diet, and exercise might modify the effects of some vitamins and minerals, so that some restricted population groups might benet (and some might be harmed). Such subgroups can be explored by analyzing individual-level data, whereas pooling study-level averages provides no information on relevant narrow subpopulations. The meta-analysis by Macpherson et al (1) is important in dis- couraging ordinary middle-aged people from taking MVMMs. Nev- ertheless, their study should not be interpreted as evidence that none of the vitamins and minerals included in the MVMM tablets have effects on males and females in the age range of 1786 y. It is possible that some vitamins, such as vitamin E, are useful for restricted groups of older people. Individual-level data analyses are needed for explor- ing such a possibility. The author did not declare any conicts of interest. Harri Hemila Department of Public Health University of Helsinki Helsinki, FIN-00014 Finland E-mail: harri.hemila@helsinki. REFERENCES 1. Macpherson H, Pipingas A, Pase MP. Multivitamin-multimineral sup- plementation and mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:43744. 2. Berlin JA, Santanna J, Schmid CH, Szczech LA, Feldman HI; Anti- Lymphocyte Antibody Induction Therapy Study Group. Individual patient- versus group-level data meta-regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head. Stat Med 2002;21:371 87. 3. Hemila H, Kaprio J. Modication of the effect of vitamin E supplemen- tation on the mortality of male smokers by age and dietary vitamin C. Am J Epidemiol 2009;169:94653. 4. Hemila H, Kaprio J. Vitamin E may affect the life expectancy of men, depending on dietary vitamin C intake and smoking. Age Ageing 2011; 40:21520. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.064204. Reply to H Hemila Dear Sir: We thank Hemila for his interest in our article entitled Multivitamin- multimineral supplementation and mortality: a meta-analysis of ran- domized controlled trials (1). Our primary nding was that, across a pooled sample of 91,074 participants, multivitamin-multimineral 502 Am J Clin Nutr 2013;98:50212. Printed in USA. 2013 American Society for Nutrition (MVMM) supplementation had no signicant effect on the risk of all-cause mortality, mortality due to cancer, or mortality due to cardiovascular disease. Despite our overall nding, Hemila asserts that some vitamins and minerals may be benecial for specic subpopulations. We concur with his suggestion that variables such as age, sex, and lifestyle fac- tors might modify the effects of some vitamins, such that differential effects may emerge in different subpopulations. However, as pointed out by Hemila, we were unable to perform subanalyses to examine the modifying effect of these different variables given that only trial- level data were available. If individual-level data were accessible we could have performed any number of subanalyses. A limitation of this approach is that each subanalysis involves an additional statistical comparison and thus a greater risk of a type I error. Furthermore, subgroup analysis based on post hoc examination of data can lead to erroneous con- clusions (2). The ndings discussed by Hemila, relating to vitamin E mortality risk across different age groups, still require replication for this reason. To avoid these issues, we used a limited number of prespecied analyses to determine the overall effects of MVMM supplementation in the general population, rather than in specic subpopulations. Our results were strengthened by the large number of trials included in our analyses, generating a large pooled sample size. Although there are several advantages to undertaking an individual-level data meta- analysis, such an analysis is not always feasible. For example, we excluded 7 relevant trials from our analysis simply because trial-level data were unobtainable. Given the difculty in obtaining raw data from chief investigators (especially when many of the trials included in our analysis were more than a decade old), undertaking a patient- level meta-analysis would have further diminished the number of trials included in our analysis. Hemila states that our meta-analysis is important in discouraging ordinary middle-aged people fromtaking MVMMs. We are not sure how this conclusion was derived from our work given that our meta- analysis did not specically focus on middle-aged adults. Moreover, whereas we found no effect of MVMMs on mortality across adults of all ages, this does not rule out other possible benets to health or well-being. Before our investigation, information on the association of MVMM use and mortality had frequently been obtained from obser- vational studies (3). Our meta-analysis showed that, across ran- domized controlled trials, MVMM supplementation had no effect on mortality (1). Although we acknowledge that vitamins may have different effects in different subpopulations, it was rst nec- essary to investigate the overall effects of MVMM supplementa- tion in the general population. Identifying a harmful effect of MVMM use across all adults would have shown greater implica- tions than identifying a harmful effect in one of many narrow subgroups. As discussed in our meta-analysis, we call for further research into the effects of MVMM use on all aspects of human health (1). This includes examination of MVMM use in specic subpopulations. MPP is funded by a Menzies Foundation Scholarship in Allied Health Sciences. AP receives funding from Swisse Wellness Pty Ltd for ongoing research projects. HM holds a Postdoctoral Fellowship, which is funded by Swisse Wellness Pty Ltd. There were no other potential conicts of interest. Helen Macpherson Andrew Pipingas Matthew P Pase Centre for Human Psychopharmacology Swinburne University of Technology Advanced Technology Building 427451 Burwood Road Hawthorn, Victoria 3122 Australia E-mail: matthewpase@gmail.com REFERENCES 1. Macpherson H, Pipingas A, Pase MP. Multivitamin-multimineral sup- plementation and mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:43744. 2. Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. A consumers guide to subgroup analyses. Ann Intern Med 1992;116:7884. 3. Chang SM. Should meta-analyses trump observational studies? Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:2378. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.064709. Limitations to the use of plasma osmolality as a hydration biomarker Dear Sir: In some laboratories, plasma osmolality (P osm ) is used as the gold standard for detecting dehydration (1), without consider- ation of its limitations; however, published data dispute this tech- nique (2, 3), which prompts us to write in response to the recent article by Cheuvront et al (4) with regard to quantitative dehy- dration assessment. This article correctly states that P osm is the key regulated variable in uid balance, which means that P osm is constantly regulated toward a central set point as the kidneys modify urine concentration and water excretion in response to diet and daily activities. We believe that this controlled regulation limits the efcacy of P osm as an index of hydration change in many experimental designs. This article (4) also states that the criticisms for adopting P osm as a gold standard for dehydration assessment are minimal (p 460). We disagree and write to de- scribe several limitations to the use of P osm as a gold standard for dehydration. First, individuals who lose a large amount of body water (reported as % body mass loss relative to a beginning euhydrated state) may exhibit a decreased P osm , contrary to anticipated hemoconcentration. For ex- ample, a summary of 2 studies (5) reported that the P osm of 6 in- dividuals (out of 39) decreased after they lost 38% of body mass. In a different study, men and women who consumed a 500-mL bolus of uid acutely exhibited an increased P osm , contrary to anticipated hemodilution (1); that is, after 90 min of rest, 4 of 30 P osm mea- surements increased. These values show that P osm may not reect widely accepted physiologic principles, and that variance of P osm measurements may be large. Second, evidence suggests that P osm changes are time- and protocol-specic. Unpublished observations (CX Mun oz, EC Johnson, JK DeMartini, et al, 2012) show that dehydration equiv- alent to 2% of body mass resulted in P osm changes that were twice as large during mild cycling exercise (2.3 h; DP osm of 9 mOsm/kg) compared with a passive exposure (5.0 h; DP osm of 4 mOsm/kg); participants consumed no water during either trial in LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 503 a 36C environment. It is likely that this difference occurred because exercise increased intracellular osmolality (6) and in- creased extracellular uid tonicity, causing water to move into muscle tissue. Third, Kenney et al (3) reported that mean (6SE) P osm values in 7 resting, euhydrated young male subjects decreased from 281 6 3 at baseline to 276 6 2 mOsm/kg at 60 min after they had consumed 1.9 L of water. However, the mean P osm value returned to baseline (282 6 2 mOsm/kg) at 90 min postingestion. These ndings chal- lenge our understanding of the interactions between intracellular- extracellular uid shifts (6) and renal compensatory mechanisms; they also suggest that further research into the time course of acute P osm changes is warranted. Fourth, 2 recent publications (7, 8) showed that a single P osm or serum osmolality measurement was a poor predictor of changes in hydration status when a single, fasted morning blood sample is collected. The former article (7) involved modied uid intake in habitually low-volume drinkers and habitually high-volume drinkers, with the outcome that P osm was constant across days in men and women, whereas urinary biomarkers reected modied water consumption. The latter publication (8) showed that serum osmolality was a poor predictor (r 2 0.01) of 24-h water retention- clearance by the kidneys. Furthermore, the NHANES (19881994) reported that serum osmolality values were constant across a wide range of uid intakes (9). Men exhibited similar mean P osm values (range: 279281 mOsm/kg) regardless of total daily uid intake, which ranged from 1.7 to 7.9 L; women exhibited similar P osm values (range: 276278 mOsm/kg) across a total daily uid intake range of 1.36.1 L. These studies argue that P osm is not appropriate in clinical settings, in which a single blood sample is collected during an ofce visit. Furthermore, Cheuvront et al (4) recommended that a P osm value of 301 6 5 mOsm/kg be used clinically as the threshold of dehydration (p 460), as determined statistically. However, pre- viously published data (10) show that a P osm value of 301 6 5 mOsm/kg represents a body mass loss of ;4.5% in healthy, young males; this marked level of dehydration is hardly a threshold for dehydration. Finally, serum samples contain numerous substances (eg, so- dium, chloride, potassium, bicarbonate, urea, glucose) that consti- tute 95% of total osmolarity. Even though they are found in small amounts (45%), proteins inuence total osmolality considerably. Thus, the water content in a serum sample is less per unit volume than in a calibration solution, and to obtain an accurate measurement of osmolality, the empirical value should be mathematically cor- rected. Furthermore, normal intraindividual differences in serum protein concentration (range: 6.08.5 g/dL) and within-individual changes in serum protein concentration induced by factors such as physical training and heat acclimation (11) increase the statisti- cal variance and difculty of interpreting the meaning of P osm as a hydration index. We recommend that scientists use P osm as a marker of dehydration cautiously, with careful consideration of experimental protocol (ie, dehydration compared with hypohydration, exercise compared with rest) and tight control of dietary total osmolar load and uid volume (2, 8, 10). We recommend that P osm not be used in clinical settings as a gold standard for dehydration assessment (2, 7, 8). The limi- tations (described above) reect the dynamic and complex regula- tion of human uid-electrolyte balance (2), which does not lend itself to generalizations. All authors were involved in the writing of this letter, reviewed its content, and approved the nal version. None of the authors claimed a conict of interest. Lawrence E Armstrong Human Performance Laboratory University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1110 E-mail: lawrence.armstrong@uconn.edu Ronald J Maughan School of Sport and Exercise Sciences Loughborough University Loughborough United Kingdom Leo C Senay Department of Pharmacologic and Physiologic Sciences St Louis University St Louis, MO Susan M Shirreffs GlaxoSmithKline Brentford United Kingdom REFERENCES 1. Sollanek KJ, Keneck RW, Cheuvront SN, Axtell RS. Potential impact of a 500-mL water bolus and body mass on plasma osmolality dilution. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011;111:19992004. 2. Armstrong LE. Assessing hydration Status: the elusive gold standard. J Am Coll Nutr 2007;26:575S84S. 3. Kenney WL, Tankersley CG, Newswanger DL, Hyde DE, Puhl SM, Turner NL. Age and hypohydration independently inuence the peripheral vascu- lar response to heat stress. J Appl Physiol 1990;68:19028. 4. Cheuvront SN, Keneck RW, Charkoudian N, Sawka MN. Physiologic basis for understanding quantitative dehydration assessment. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:45562. 5. Sawka MN, Montain SJ, Latzka WA. Body uid balance during exer- cise-heat exposure. In: Buskirk ER, Puhl SM, eds. Body uid balance in exercise and sport. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1996:13958. 6. Sjgaard S, Saltin B. Extra- and intracellular water spaces in muscles of man at rest and with dynamic exercise. Am J Physiol 1982;243:R27180. 7. Perrier E, Desmazieres A, Girard N, Pross N, Osbild D, Metzger D, Guelinckx I, Klein A. Circadian variation and responsiveness of hydra- tion biomarkers to changes in daily water intake. Eur J Appl Physiol 2013;Apr 23 (Epub ahead of print; DOI:10.1007/s00421-013-2649-0). 8. Armstrong LE, Johnson EC, McKenzie AL, Munoz CX. Interpreting common hydration biomarkers on the basis of solute and water excre- tion. Eur J Clin Nutr 2013;67:24953. 9. Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference In- takes for water, potassium, sodium, chloride, and sulfate. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2004:269423. 10. Armstrong LE, Maresh CM, Gabaree CV, Hoffman JR, Kavouras SA, Keneck RW, Castellani JW, Ahlquist LE. Thermal and circulatory re- sponses during exercise: effects of hypohydration, dehydration, and wa- ter intake. J Appl Physiol 1997;82:202835. 11. Senay LC, Kok R. Effects of training and heat acclimatization on blood plasma contents of exercising men. J Appl Physiol 1977;43:5919. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.065466. 504 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Reply to LE Armstrong et al Dear Sir: We have great respect for the authors who have expressed in- terest in our article, and we appreciate the opportunity to reply to their letter; however, we nd little convincing evidence for their concerns. First and foremost we wish to emphasize 2 important points from our article that were left out of the quote taken from page 460 (1). We were very careful in our review to outline why plasma osmolality (P osm ) should be considered a gold standard for assessing dehydration, dened as intracellular dehydration (or hypertonic-hypovolemia), and not extracellular dehydration (or isotonic-hypovolemia or vol- ume depletion). We also point out the criticality of considering the dehydration magnitude. With these 2 very important points in mind, the criticisms that we describe as minimal on page 460 relate directly to articles that have neglected these important points in their misguided assertions about the limitations of using P osm for assessing dehydration. The criticisms of our review on dehydration assessment seem to involve 3 major points: 1) disparate research ndings, 2) a P osm threshold of 301 6 5 mmol/kg for dehydration, and 3) the contri- bution of protein to P osm . Disparate research ndings Six published articles or reports were used when trying to re- fute our review. Curiously, only 2 of those studies were designed to produce dehydration and only one directly described the po- tential for using P osm to quantify dehydration (2). Although the remaining studies referenced do describe the normal, and ex- tremely well-documented, physiologic response to both normal and overconsumption of water (water intake water losses), when carefully read they do not in any way refute the perspec- tives presented in our article. As a matter of interpretation, we would also suggest that the composite gure from Sawka et al (2) shows that P osm responded to dehydration exactly as expected in 33 of 39 volunteers (85%). In a recent study from our labo- ratory (3) in which baseline values were very carefully controlled, P osm increased in 36 of 36 volunteers (100%) who became de- hydrated by 2.25.8% of body mass via sweating (exercise-heat stress). Nowhere in our article do we generalize or make claims that P osm is perfect. We do argue, however, that P osm is the best currently available assessment measure (gold standard) for one specic type of dehydration (intracellular). P osm threshold of 301 6 5 mmol/kg A full appreciation for the genesis of the 301 6 5-mmol/kg threshold for dehydration requires knowledge of biological var- iation and diagnostic decision making, which goes well beyond the scope of this letter. We encourage interested readers to seek Cheuvront et al (1, 4, 5) for details. Briey, the nosological sensitivity of P osm is modest but superior to all other common body uids used to assess dehydration. When the variance term for P osm is properly considered, the range of P osm values that indicate dehydration (2% body mass) agree extremely well with many independently published observations and commonly accepted clinical thresholds for dehydration (4). Change values are better when it is practical to make 2 measures, but here again P osm does extremely well (4, 5). The DP osm remains sensitive even when water loading is used (urine osmolality:P osm ,1.5). This practice is often adopted in research where assurance of euhydration is desired; however, it is important to recognize that it also decreases the nosological sensitivity of the 301 6 5-mmol/kg threshold (4). Under said circumstances, a 1 5-mmol/kg change in P osm still affords 80% probability that intracellular dehydration has occurred (4, 5), which is remark- ably consistent with the well-taught osmotic change threshold (;2% or 16 mmol/kg) for renal compensation and water ac- quisition (thirst) (1). Contribution of protein to P osm In all of our articles on P osm (1, 35), and more in press or forthcoming, we recognize and discuss its complexity. A reduc- tion in plasma water increases the concentration of all dissolved substances. It is, of course, well known that plasma protein con- centration increases linearly as plasma water is reduced (6). When assessing the potential for dehydration, the question can only be why it increases. The concentration of P osm reects the loss of water from the plasma and it describes the loss of body water very well (3). Both inter- and intraindividual variation in plasma protein concentrations are already a part of inter- and intraindividual P osm variation (4). Therefore, plasma protein variation is already taken into consideration in the 301 6 5-mmol/kg threshold. Thus, unless there is good reason to believe that circumstances have produced a grossly dispropor- tionate increase in protein beyond that expected from plasma water loss, there would be no need for corrections. Studies from our laboratory and Senays pioneering research have shown that plasma protein can be added by heat exposure as well as lost with dehydration. We acknowledge that some ux of total circulating proteins occurs, but as previously stated such protein uxes are already part of the observed variance and di- agnostic error. Any acute inuence of protein ux due to exercise would also be remedied by allowing proper recovery (1). In other words, the potential for plasma protein to confound the appropriate use of P osm for assessing dehydration is marginal at best. In our review article (1), we carefully described the true lim- itations of using P osm for dehydration assessment on page 460. The concerns expressed in the letter by Armstrong et al are clearly but curiously misplaced. We must therefore regard the limitations inferred by the title of their letter as false. All of the authors were involved in the writing of this letter, reviewed its content, and approved the nal version. The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and should not be construed as ofcial or reecting the views of the US Army or the US Department of De- fense. None of the authors claimed a conict of interest. Samuel N Cheuvront Robert W Keneck Nisha Charkoudian US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine Thermal and Mountain Medicine Division Kansas Street, Building 42 Natick, MA 01760 E-mail: samuel.n.cheuvront.civ@mail.mil Michael N Sawka Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 505 REFERENCES 1. Cheuvront SN, Keneck RW, Charkoudian N, Sawka MN. Physiologic basis for understanding quantitative dehydration assessment. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:45562. 2. Sawka MN, Montain SJ, Latzka WA. Body uid balance during exercise- heat exposure. In: Buskirk ER, Puhl SM, eds. Body uid balance in exercise and sport. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1996:13958. 3. Cheuvront SN, Keneck RW, Sollanek KJ, Ely BR, Sawka MN. Water- decit equation: systematic analysis and improvement. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:7985. 4. Cheuvront SN, Ely BR, Keneck RW, Sawka MN. Biological variation and diagnostic accuracy of dehydration assessment markers. Am J Clin Nutr 2010;92:56573. 5. Cheuvront SN, Fraser CG, Keneck RW, Ely BR, Sawka MN. Reference change values for dehydration monitoring. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 49:10337. 6. Eisenman AJ, Mackenzie LB, Peters JP. Protein and water of serum and cells of human blood, with a note on the measurement of red cell volume. J Biol Chem 1936;116:335. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.065482. No and low alcohol intake may have differential effects on risk of overall and cause-specic mortality Dear Sir: We read with great interest the article by Vergnaud et al (1) on the relation between adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF)/American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) guidelines and risk of death in Europe. This well-crafted, large-scale study conducted in participants in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort offers valuable data re- garding the impact of the WCRF/AICR recommendations on re- ducing total and cause-specic mortality and suggests that the utility of these guidelines may extend beyond the scope of cancer prevention. We are, however, keen on gaining additional under- standing of the results presented in their Table 4: namely, the risk of death associated with alcohol consumption. The authors found that adherence to the WCRF/AICR recommen- dation for daily alcohol intake (2 drinks for men and 1 drink for women) was protective against all-cause mortality in men but not in women. This result was based on a scoring system that operation- alized this alcohol-specic guideline into 3 categories of ethanol intake: 20, .20 to 30, and .30 g/d for men and 10, .10 to 20, and .20 g/d for women. Among the 257,421 male study participants, the men whose ethanol intake was .20 to 30 g/d had a signicantly reduced risk of death compared with men whose consumption exceeded 30 g/d (HR: 0.80), as did men who limited their intake to 20 g/d compared with the same referent (HR: 0.89). However, signicant associations between risk of death and the alcoholic drinks component of the WCRF/AICR recommendations were not observed among the 121,443 female study participants. We are highly curious both to learn whether making the distinction between no and lowethanol intake would alter the results of this anal- ysis and to see the stratication of HRs by cause of death. Whereas it is widely acknowledged that, unlike in cardiovascular disease, the lowest alcohol-related cancer risk is in fact conferred in the absence of alcohol consumption (2), there remains uncertainty regarding whether the protective effect of abstinence on cancer risk translates to survival outcomes. The most current estimate of alcohol-attributable cancer mortality in the United States to our knowledge suggests that alcohol consumption at any level not only increases cancer risk but, more critically, is a major factor behind cancer-related death in men and women (3). Interestingly, the number of alcohol-attributable deaths was highest for female breast cancer in this investigation. A meta-analysis by Bagnardi et al (4) that included 222 articles concern- ing alcohol consumption and cancer found that light alcohol drinking (1 drink/d) was associated with breast cancer death. In contrast and illustrative of the ambiguity related to drinking and cancer mortality, another recent study reported that any alcohol consumption either before or after breast cancer diagnosis had no adverse impact on survival from breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, or other cause, and that moderate consumption may even have a survival benet (5). The robust data set of Vergnaud et al presents an opportunity for additional analyses that could shed further light on the advantages or lack thereof of teetotaling in the prevention of cancer or other chronic diseases. As such, we appreciate the authors consideration of our request that they both reoperationalize the alcohol-specic WCRF/AICR score such that 0 g/d of ethanol intake is assigned its own category and evaluate alcohol-specic mortality by cause of death and share these results. Support for this letter was provided by the University of Alabama at Bir- mingham Cancer Prevention and Control training grant R25 CA047888. The authors had no conicts of interest to disclose. Emily Falk Libby Department of Nutrition Sciences University of Alabama at Birmingham VH G017, 1670 University Boulevard Birmingham, AL 35294-0019 E-mail: elibby@uab.edu Michelle S Williams Department of Health Behavior University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham, AL Will L Tarver Department of Health Care Organization and Policy University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham, AL Wendy Demark-Wahnefried Department of Nutrition Sciences University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham, AL REFERENCES 1. Vergnaud AC, Romaguera D, Peeters PH, van Gils CH, Chan DS, Romieu I, Freisling H, Ferrari P, Clavel-Chapelon F, Fagherazzi G, et al. Adher- ence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research guidelines and risk of death in Europe: results from the Euro- pean Prospective Investigation into Nutrition and Cancer cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:110720. 2. Kushi LH, Doyle C, McCullough M, Rock CL, Demark-Wahnefried W, Bandera EV, Gapstur S, Patel AV, Andrews K, Gansler T. American Cancer Society Guidelines on nutrition and physical activity for cancer 506 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR prevention: reducing the risk of cancer with healthy food choices and physical activity. CA Cancer J Clin 2012;62:3067. 3. Nelson DE, Jarman DW, Rehm J, Greeneld TK, Rey G, Kerr WC, Miller P, Shield KD, Ye Y, Naimi TS. Alcohol-attributable cancer deaths and years of potential life lost in the United States. Am J Public Health 2013;103:6418. 4. Bagnardi V, Rota M, Botteri E, Tramacere I, Islam F, Fedirko V, Scotti L, Jenab M, Turati F, Pasquali E, et al. Light alcohol drinking and cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Oncol 2013;24:3018. 5. Newcomb PA, Kampman E, Trentham-Dietz A, Egan KM, Titus LJ, Baron JA, Hampton JM, Passarelli MN, Willett WC. Alcohol consump- tion before and after breast cancer diagnosis: associations with survival from breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, and other causes. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:193946. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.066217. Reply to E Falk Libby et al Dear Sir: We thank Falk Libby et al for their interest in our article. We acknowledge the need for more detailed analysis of the association between individual components of the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AIRC) score, including alcohol consumption and cause-specic mortal- ity. The association between pattern of lifetime alcohol use and cause of death in the European Prospective Investigation into Can- cer and Nutrition (EPIC) study has been addressed in detail by Manuela M Bergmann et al in a manuscript currently under sub- mission. Results cannot be displayed before publication, so we en- courage Falk Libby et al to pay attention to the release of this article, which will provide a comprehensive answer to their requests. None of the authors had a conict of interest. Anne-Claire Vergnaud Dora Romaguera Petra HM Peeters Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics School of Public Health Imperial College London Medical Building, Room VC8, Norfolk Place St Marys Campus London, W2 1PG United Kingdom E-mail: a.vergnaud@imperial.ac.uk Carla H van Gils Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands Doris SM Chan Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics School of Public Health Imperial College London London United Kingdom Manuela M Bergmann Division of Epidemiology German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbrucke Germany Teresa Norat Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics School of Public Health Imperial College London London United Kingdom On behalf of the EPIC coauthors doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.066324. The challenge of complexity and arginine metabolism Dear Sir: Chapeau! to Mariotti et al (1) for their attempt to put order to complexity by giving a dimension to arginine uxes in its metabolism. But, complexity is both a challenge and a burden. An important question relates to the lack of computation of the possible effects that arginine-derived and naturally produced inhibitors of enzymes dealing with arginine metabolism, such as asymmetric-di-methyl-arginine (ADMA), may have on peripheral tissue activity of arginases (2). Do the authors have data on acute effects of arginine ingestion on ADMA? Indeed, it has been reported that long-term ingestion of arginine sup- plements increases ADMA (3) and inhibition of arginases was efcient in maintaining nitric oxide (NO) production and in preventing damage related to impaired NO production in peripheral tissues (4). Also, the expression and activity of arginases, and thus their con- tribution to plasma and urea by red blood cells, were not sufciently stressed by Mariotti et al in their text or in the supplemental data. Peculiarly, in capillaries red blood cells may dramatically control and blunt arginine concentrations in plasma (5, 6) and this should also be included in a model that focuses on clusters of peripheral needs, even if the said model groups together sums of activities by different compartments. Moreover, habitual dietary arginine intake by controlling arginase expression may rule uxes of arginine toward availability for protein syntheses or catabolism producing urea. Urea production may become misleading in evaluating adequate nitrogen intake if this is calculated on the basis of urinary urea excretion (7). The author did not declare any conicts of interest. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 507 Francesco Saverio Dioguardi Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health University of Milan via Sannio 18 20137 Milan-I Italy E-mail: fsdioguardi@gmail.com REFERENCES 1. Mariotti F, Petzke KJ, Bonnet D, Szezepanski I, Bos C, Huneau J-F, Fouillet H. Kinetics of the utilization of dietary arginine for nitric oxide and urea synthesis: insight into the argininenitric oxide metabolic sys- tem in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:9729. 2. Masuda H. Signicance of nitrogen oxide and its modulation mecha- nisms by endogenous nitrogen oxide synthase inhibitors and arginase in the micturition disorders and erectile dysfunction. Int J Urol 2008; 15:12834. 3. Jabecka A, Ast J, Bogdaski P, Drozdowski M, Pawlak-Lemaska K, Cielewicz AR, Pupek-Musialik D. Oral L-arginine supplementation in patients with mild arterial hypertension and its effect on plasma level of asymmetric dimethylarginine, L-citrulline, L-arginine and antioxidant status. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2012;16:166574. 4. Shemyakin A, Kovamees O, Rafnsson A, Bohm F, Svenarud P, Settergren M, Jung C, Pernow J. Arginase inhibition improves endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circu- lation 2012;126:294350. 5. El-Hady SB, Farahat MH, Atfy M, Elhady MA. Nitric oxide metabolites and arginase I levels in b-thalassemic patients: an Egyptian study. Ann Hematol 2012;91:1193200. 6. Carvalho DR, Brand GD, Brum JM, Takata RI, Speck-Martins CE, Pratesi R. Analysis of novel ARG1 mutations causing hyperargininemia and correlation with arginase I activity in erythrocytes. Gene. 2012; 509(1):12430. 7. Dioguardi FS. To give or not to give? Lessons from arginine paradox. J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics. 2011;4:908. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.065011. Reply to FS Dioguardi Dear Sir: We appreciated the congratulations and comments received from Dioguardi regarding our recently published article, which was the rst attempt to delineate the metabolism of dietary arginine, including its bioavailability and utilization for the competitive pathways that are arginase and nitric oxide (NO) synthase (1). The objective of model development was to determine the minimal structure for this nutri- tional system that could solve the isotopic metabolic data at hand and provide an insight into the key metabolic/compartmental structuring that explains how the body deals structurally with arginine intake. According to the design and process of this modeling study, the effects of any potential changes in arginase or NO synthase activity during the postprandial phase (the potential existence of which was suggested by Dioguardi) are embedded in the isotopic (urea and ni- trate) metabolic data and are therefore computed in the model pre- dictions for the uxes of urea and NO production. In the model, both urea and NOproduction indeed originate fromboth a plasma compart- ment and another compartment that aggregates all other possible sour- ces of arginine entry into the NO synthase and arginase pathways. Because the parsimony principle was applied when developing the model, we selected the minimum structure that would include just the main features of the system to reduce model complexity to a man- ageable level (2, 3), and we did not represent all of the compartments of physiologic interest, such as the red blood cells mentioned by Dioguardi. In other words, a higher-order model with a more detailed structure was not required to analyze the data and the main features of the system. As Dioguardi will understand, this does not mean that red blood cells are not physiologically important with respect to arginase activity, and, as he suggested, peripheral arginase activity, which we estimated mainly as urea synthesis from plasma dietary arginine, may in part be ascribed to this specic compartment. However, once again, any contribution of red blood cells to the dynamics of post- prandial arginine metabolism is both embedded in the data and solved by the model. Of course, our model, like all models, remains a sim- plication of the system but has proved to be the simplest way to understand the dynamic behavior of the arginine nutritional system. To answer the direct question posed by Dioguardi with regard to plasma asymmetric-di-methyl-arginine (ADMA), we do have these data on effects after the ingestion of arginine in this setting, and we did not observe that plasma ADMA changed after ingestion (4). Of note, Dioguardi cited a reference that reported an increase in plasma ADMA with long-term arginine supplementation, whereas our re- sults, and those of other groups, indicated no increase in different populations and at different doses (eg, 59). However, from a general standpoint, we agree that little is known about the possible changes in arginine metabolism with regard to NO compared with urea in individuals given large amounts of argi- nine over the long term, and that changes in arginase activity have emerged as a critical determinant of arginine-NO homeostasis and vascular health (10). Our study was not designed to address these potential long-term effects or to analyze the related underlying pos- sible mechanisms. By using the integrative methodology detailed here, future studies may be able to investigate whether, and to what extent, the key parameters of the system are affected by a long-term increase in arginine intake and should also be able to determine how the system is altered in prepathological conditions (such as with the metabolic syndrome) and in different dietary and nutri- tional situations. The authors declared no conicts of interest. Franc xois Mariotti Jean-Franc xois Huneau UMR914 Nutrition Physiology and Ingestive Behavior CRNH-IdF AgroParisTech F-75005 Paris France E-mail: francois.mariotti@agroparistech.fr Hele`ne Fouillet UMR914 Nutrition Physiology and Ingestive Behavior CRNH-IdF INRA F-75005 Paris France REFERENCES 1. Mariotti F, Petzke KJ, Bonnet D, Szezepanski I, Bos C, Huneau JF, Fouillet H. Kinetics of the utilization of dietary arginine for nitric oxide 508 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR and urea synthesis: insight into the arginine-nitric oxide metabolic sys- tem in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:9729. 2. Cobelli C, Caumo A. Using what is accessible to measure that which is not: necessity of model of system. Metabolism 1998;47:100935. 3. Juillet B, Saccomani MP, Bos C, Gaudichon C, Tome D, Fouillet H. Conceptual, methodological and computational issues concerning the compartmental modeling of a complex biological system: postprandial inter-organ metabolism of dietary nitrogen in humans. Math Biosci 2006;204:282309. 4. Mariotti F, Huneau JF, Szezepanski I, Petzke KJ, Aggoun Y, Tome D, Bonnet D. Meal amino acids with varied levels of arginine do not affect postprandial vascular endothelial function in healthy young men. J Nutr 2007;137:13839. 5. West SG, Likos-Krick A, Brown P, Mariotti F. Oral L-arginine improves hemodynamic responses to stress and reduces plasma homocysteine in hypercholesterolemic men. J Nutr 2005;135:2127. 6. Boger GI, Rudolph TK, Maas R, Schwedhelm E, Dumbadze E, Bierend A, Benndorf RA, Boger RH. Asymmetric dimethylarginine determines the improvement of endothelium-dependent vasodilation by simvastatin: effect of combination with oral L-arginine. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:227482. 7. Schwedhelm E, Maas R, Freese R, Jung D, Lukacs Z, Jambrecina A, Spickler W, Schulze F, Boger RH. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacody- namic properties of oral L-citrulline and L-arginine: impact on nitric oxide metabolism. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2008;65:519. 8. Bode-Boger SM, Muke J, Surdacki A, Brabant G, Boger RH, Frolich JC. Oral L-arginine improves endothelial function in healthy individuals older than 70 years. Vasc Med 2003;8:7781. 9. Walker HA, McGing E, Fisher I, Boger RH, Bode-Boger SM, Jackson G, Ritter JM, Chowienczyk PJ. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation is in- dependent of the plasma L-arginine/ADMA ratio in men with stable an- gina: lack of effect of oral L-arginine on endothelial function, oxidative stress and exercise performance. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:499505. 10. Morris SM Jr. Recent advances in arginine metabolism: roles and reg- ulation of the arginases. Br J Pharmacol 2009;157:92230. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.065474. Describing a taxonomy of cognitive processes for clinical trials assessing cognition Dear Sir: Stonehouse et al (1) reported that DHA supplementation im- proved both memory and reaction time in healthy, young adults. This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial had many strengths and was, for the most part, technically sound. How- ever, we question the atheoretical manner in which the cognitive tests were grouped into broader cognitive abilities. In an accompanying editorial, Dangour and Allen (2) questioned the applicability of the cognitive tests used by Stonehouse et al (1). They stated that considerable variability exists in the cognitive tests used between clinical trials and that this signicantly hampers com- parisons between studies (2). Dangour and Allen proposed that ex- perts in the eld should urgently agree on a set of cognitive tests to be used consistently across clinical trials (2). We agree that efforts need to be made to facilitate cross-study comparisons. Yet, consensus as to a standardized set of cognitive tasks is unlikely to be agreed on given the plethora of cognitive tests available and the fact that individual preferences for specic cognitive tests vary greatly. Moreover, be- cause different cognitive tests are suited to different populations and interventions, cognitive tests are often appropriately selected on a case-by-case basis. We propose a less radical solution to aid cross- study comparisons in this area. Even if researchers cannot agree on the cognitive tests used, con- sensus should be reached on the types of cognitive functions that ex- ist. This would then enable reviewers and readers of published studies to better understand the scope of the tests chosen against the full spectrum of cognitive processes that have been reliably dis- covered. At present, many clinical trials combine cognitive tests into broader cognitive abilities without justication from existing litera- ture or factor analytic investigation. This appears to be the case in the study by Stonehouse et al (1), whereby cognitive tests are combined into cognitive domains of episodic memory, working memory, at- tention, and processing speed without explicit justication for this grouping. This signicantly hampers comparisons between studies because the cognitive composites are seemingly arbitrary and may never be created again in the same way. We suggest that a standard- ized and evidence-based approach to grouping cognitive test data will aid comparisons between studies. An empirically supported model for grouping cognitive test data already exists but seems to be ignored by the eld of clinical nutrition. On the basis of 70 y of factor analytical work on cognition, Carroll (3) published a seminal book on human cognitive abilities. Through ex- tensive factor analysis of .460 data sets, his work provides a solid empirical and science-based approach to better understanding the struc- ture of cognition. Such is the signicance of this publication to the area of applied psychometrics that it has been compared in importance to Sir Isaac Newtons Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy (4). FIGURE 1. The structure of cognitive abilities based on the work of Carroll (3). Note that the gure is designed to give a snapshot of the model and only some of the 69 narrow cognitive abilities are shown. Adapted with permission from Cambridge University Press. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 509 Carrolls work provides an empirically veried taxonomy of human cognitive abilities (4). In essence, Carroll (3) outlined a 3-strata hierarchical model of cognitive ability (Figure 1). At the broadest level, stratum 3 consists of a general intelligence factor, which sub- sumes the following 2 strata. The second stratum includes 8 broad cognitive abilities. Stratum 1 includes a group of 69 narrow, well- dened abilities. All of the cognitive abilities can be classied as belonging to one of the following domains: language, reasoning, memory and learning, visual perception, auditory perception, idea production, cognitive speed, knowledge and achievement, and mis- cellaneous abilities (3). These cognitive abilities can also be bro- ken down into additional narrow abilities. For example, memory and learning can be further broken down into associative memory, meaningful memory, free recall memory, visual memory, and learning abilities. It is easy to group cognitive test scores into these true cognitive abilities because the taxonomy was derived through extensive factor analysis of existing cognitive tests used throughout the past century. Carroll also provides descriptions of each cognitive ability. We therefore suggest that researchers use this taxonomy to group cognitive test score data or at least report how their measures map onto this framework. This will allow signicantly better comparison across clinical studies assessing cognition. The ndings reported by Stonehouse et al (1) are of great in- terest, but as pointed out by others, heterogeneity in cognitive outcomes between studies is signicantly limiting advancements in this eld. It is surprising that researchers continue to group cognitive tasks into seemingly arbitrary cognitive abilities when a comprehensive evidence-based approach exists. Carrolls work provides a common nomenclature for professional communica- tion (4). From a practice perspective, this nomenclature allows for comparison and grouping of cognitive tests across studies. This cognitive taxonomy is widely accepted and used in the eld of psychology, and we suggest that it also be appropriately ap- plied in clinical trial research. Neither of the authors had a conict of interest. Matthew P Pase Con Stough Centre for Human Psychopharmacology Swinburne University of Technology 400 Burwood Road Hawthorn, Victoria, 3122 Australia E-mail: matthewpase@gmail.com REFERENCES 1. Stonehouse W, Conlon C, Podd J, Hill SR, Minihane AM, Haskell C, Kennedy D. DHA supplementation improved both memory and reaction time in healthy young adults: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:113443. 2. Dangour AD, Allen E. Omega-3 fats boost brain function in adults? Are we any closer to an answer? Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:90910. 3. Carroll JB. Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factor analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1993. 4. Flanagan DP, Harrison PL, eds. A history of intelligence assessment. 3rd ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press, 2012. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.065532. Reply to MP Pase and C Stough Dear Sir: In an editorial commenting on our recently published study (1), which showed benecial cognitive effects as a consequence of 6 mo of sup- plementation with DHA in healthy, young adults, Dangour and Allen (2) expressed major concerns over the heterogeneity of the tests being used to assess the cognitive function of adults in clinical trials. They illustrated their point by noting that a wide selection of cognitive tests had been used across the 10 relevant studies published in the Journal in 20112012, and that no 2 studies had adopted the same primary end- points. What they failed to mention was that only one of these studies used any form of computer-administered cognitive testing. The other studies collected data in written or verbal form. In our own case, we used a sophisticated computerized cognitive assessment system (COM- PASS; Northumbria University) that was purpose designed to deliver multiple, parallel versions of a wide range of classic, standard, and bespoke cognitive tasks. The tasks used in the study were then chosen with reference to the recommendations of the European Food Safety Authoritys recent guidance on the cognitive tests that are suitable for assessing the effects of nutritional interventions (3) and previous work in this area by an expert panel under the auspices of the International Life Sciences Institute (4). The potential benets of assessing cognitive function with a computer are self-evident and include the collection of accurate information on the speed of performing tasks and responding to stimuli. This information represents a fundamental measure of brain function and is always either equally informative or complementary to information on the accuracy of task performance. Beyond this, on a purely practical level, computerized testing also allows the standardized presentation of properly randomized stimuli, it removes the person- to-person interactions with a researcher that can bias and obfuscate data, and it allows the closely controlled collection of a large amount of data within a short period of time. We are literally surrounded in our everyday lives by powerful personal computers, and computerized cog- nitive testing can be readily adopted both in the laboratory and in more ecologically valid environments. Given the above, it is somewhat baf- ing that our own study was picked out for the editorial observations on the heterogeneity of testing across the eld. Dangour and Allen concluded their editorial by suggesting that experts in cognitive testing urgently need to reach a consensus on a small set of outcomes to use across future trials. Pase and Stough, in response, suggest that because consensus in this regard is unlikely, Carrolls Three Stratum Theory (5) could provide a taxonomy for cognitive processes that could then inform a standardized and evidence based approach to grouping cognitive test data. By Pase and Stoughs account, our own atheoretical collapsing of task outcomes into arbitrary composite scores (which, in reality, were based on a previous factor analysis of a similar group of tasks) could be replaced by simply grouping or describing the task outcomes from a study with reference to the 8 broad cognitive ability domains and 69 narrow, well-dened abilities in Carrolls model. Whereas this seems, on the face of it, to be a plausible suggestion, there are actually several major obstacles standing in the way of adopting this approach. From a purely practical perspective, a major problem would be deciding how a given task outcome maps onto one or more of Carrolls factor analysisderived abilities. Presumably, this process would require further factor analysis of multiple data sets. From a more theoretical perspective, Carrolls model could also best be described as a work in progress. As he himself noted in his preface, the model was merely a starting point for future investigators and was formulated by looking backward. Carroll also acknowledged the in- adequacy of some of the data that he had to work with. For instance, 510 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR he noted that the literature on memory and learning leaves much to be desired and listed the many gaps in the data that would need to be lled to arrive at a complete picture of this domain. In consequence, Carrolls model has not been the xed and stationary taxonomy that Pase and Stough would seem to be suggesting. Rather, it has been in a continuous state of modication since its initial publication. More recently, it has, for instance, been integrated with other models and has been modied and added to as new data and analytic techniques have become available (6). As an example, up to 6 new broad cog- nitive ability domains have been suggested as additions to Carrolls original 8 domains (6). It is also notable that Carroll started work on his opus magnum in 1979 and worked on it for 14 y, synthesizing the ndings of factor analyses from a vast body of data. Although he himself was a pioneer in the application of computer technology to his complex analyses, the data that he worked with were collected without the benet of any such technology. As McGrew noted recently (6), Carrolls work represented a tip- ping point that provided the rst working map of the human cognitive ability terrain, a terrain warranting additional exploration and rened cartographic efforts. McGrew went on to urge the integration of cur- rent and future research into the emerging taxonomy. However, in this task we still seem to be laboring, certainly within the clinical trials eld, with the astrolabes, quadrants, and verniers of the early map makers. Simply adopting the ubiquitous technology of our own age would necessarily make for much more accurate map- ping tools, and therefore better maps. Although I applaud the am- bition of Pase and Stoughs suggestion, I think the necessary rst step toward their ultimate goal, and indeed greater standardization of cognitive tests, is the wider adoption of sensitive computerized testing techniques within the clinical trials eld. The resulting data can then contribute to the factor-analytic process of further rening the map of human cognitive ability. The author had no conicts of interest. David O Kennedy Brain, Performance and Nutrition Research Centre Northumbria University Newcastle, NE1 8ST United Kingdom E-mail: david.kennedy@northumbria.ac.uk REFERENCES 1. Stonehouse W, Conlon CA, Podd J, Hill SR, Minihane AM, Haskell C, Kennedy D. DHA supplementation improved both memory and reaction time in healthy young adults: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:113443. 2. Dangour AD, Do Allen E. Omega-3 fats boost brain function in adults? Are we any closer to an answer? Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:90910. 3. European Food Safety Authority. Guidance on the scientic require- ments for health claims related to functions of the nervous system, in- cluding psychological functions. EFSA J 2012;10:2816. 4. Westenhoefer J, Bellisle F, Blundell JE, de Vries J, Edwards D, Kallus W, Milon H, Pannemans D, Tuijtelaars S, Tuorila H. PASSCLAIM mental state and performance. Eur J Nutr 2004;43:II85117. 5. Carroll JB. Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factor analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1993. 6. McGrew KS. CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence 2009;37:110. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.065730. Erratum Gibert A, Kruizinga AG, Neuhold S, Houben GF, Canela MA, Fasano A, Catassi C. Might gluten traces in wheat substitutes pose a risk in patients with celiac disease? Apopulation-based probabilistic approach to risk estimation. AmJ Clin Nutr 2013;97:10916. Because of a copyediting error, data are missing in Table 3 for Distribution under Scenario 3. In the rst 2 columns, under Combination of the 4 countries, the Mean 6SD value should be 0.18 60.04, and the 95th Percentile value should be 0.24. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.065615. Erratum Kien CL, Bunn JY, Tompkins CL, Dumas JA, Crain KI, Ebenstein DB, Koves TR, Muoio DM. Substituting dietary monoun- saturated fat for saturated fat is associated with increased daily physical activity and resting energy expenditure and with changes in mood. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:68997. On page 693, the second sentence in the third paragraph of the Results section contains a copyediting error in which the word or was mistakenly used: 15 or 17 subjects should read 15 of 17 subjects instead. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.066282. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 511 Erratum Schernhammer ES, Bertrand KA, Birmann BM, Sampson L, Willett WC, Feskanich D. Consumption of articial sweetener and sugar-containing soda and risk of lymphoma and leukemia in men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;96:141928. The supplemental data for this article were inadvertently missed during production and were therefore not posted online. The supplemental data le (Table 1) is now available online. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.066365. Erratum Wilkinson SB, Tarnopolsky MA, MacDonald MJ, MacDonald JR, Armstrong D, Phillips SM. Consumption of uid skim milk promotes greater muscle protein accretion after resistance exercise than does consumption of an isonitrogenous and isoenergetic soy-protein beverage. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85:103140. On page 1039, an error appears in the legend to Figure 5. The solid circle line should represent skimmilk, and the open circle line should represent the soy-protein beverage. The rst sentence of the gure legend should read as follows: Mean (6SEM) total amino acid (TAA) chemical net balance (NB) after consumption of a nonfat milk-protein beverage (d) or an isonitrogenous, isoenergetic, macronutrient-matched (750 kJ, 18.2 g protein, 1.5 g fat, and 23 g carbohydrate) soy-protein beverage (s). doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.067389. Erratum Clemente-Postigo M, Queipo-Ortuno MI, Boto-Ordonez M, Coin-Araguez L, Roca-Rodriguez MdM, Delgado-Lista J, Cardona F, Andres-Lacueva C, Tinahones FJ. Effect of acute and chronic red wine consumption on lipopolysaccharide concentrations. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:105361. On page 1053, footnote 2 should include the following additional funding information: The study was also supported by CP07/ 00095 from the ISCIII, and MdMR-R was a recipient of a fellowship from ISCIII (Rio Hortega CM11/00030), Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Madrid, Spain. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.066357. 512 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR