Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical j our nal homepage: www. el sevi er . com/ l ocat e/ snb A polymer lab chip sensor with microfabricated planar silver electrode for continuous and on-site heavy metal measurement Wooseok Jung a , Am Jang b, , Paul L. Bishop b , Chong H. Ahn a a MicroSystems and BioMEMS Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA b Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 11 August 2010 Received in revised form 22 November 2010 Accepted 22 November 2010 Available online 26 November 2010 Keywords: Lead (Pb(II)) On-site measurement Reusable polymer lab chip sensor Silver electrode Square-wave anodic stripping voltammetry (SWASV) a b s t r a c t This paper presents a reusablepolymer labchipsensor for continuous andon-siteheavymetal monitoring in nature. In particular, detection of lead (Pb(II)), which is the most common heavy metal pollutant, has been performed using the proposed lab chip sensor. The miniaturized lab chip sensor consists of a micro- fabricated silver working electrode that replaces the conventional mercury and bismuth electrodes, an integrated silver counter and quasi-reference electrode, and microuidic channels. The proposed sensor targets on-site environmental monitoring in a continuous fashion without disturbing or contaminat- ing the sensing environment when it is reused. The reusability of the miniaturized lab chip sensor was characterized through forty-three consecutive measurements in non-deoxygenating standard solutions inside the microchannels using square-wave anodic stripping voltammetry (SWASV). With only 13.5L of sample volume the sensor chip showed a correlation coefcient of 0.998 for the Pb(II) concentration range of 11000ppb with the limit of detection of 0.55ppb at 300s deposition time. The peak potentials during the forty-three consecutive SWASV measurements showed a relative standard deviation of 1.0%, with a standard deviation of 0.005V. The high repeatability and linearity of the sensor over the large, three orders of magnitude, dynamic range of 11000ppb showed that the developed sensor chip can be reused for a variety of on-site measurements such as for soil pore water or groundwater, using only micro-volumes. 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction With the increasing trend toward urbanization, the serious side effects posed by heavy metals to human health and the environ- ment have been a major concern [1]. In particular, as lead (Pb(II)) concentrations in public supply wells have reached unacceptable levels in many parts of the world, it has become obvious that more attention needs to be paid to linkages between the effects of human activities on the surface and groundwater quality. It was widely reported that the elevated levels of Pb(II) in drinking water are primarily related to human health effects such as damage of the brain and nervous system, behavioral and learning disabilities, blood pressure increase, and kidney injury and anemia [2]. As a consequence, the current stringent potable water standard (maxi- mumcontaminant level, MCL) for Pb(II) has beenset by the U.S. EPA at less than 0.015mg/L of Pb(II). The combination of high toxicity and widespread occurrence has created a pressing need for effec- tive monitoring and measurement of Pb(II) in surface waters and groundwater. Since on-site measurement is essential toachieve the
E-mail address: amjang68@gmail.com (A. Jang). effective monitoring strategies, there is a clear need for reliable, efcient and cost-effective monitoring technologies for Pb(II) that adversely affects human health. Conventionally, levels of trace heavy metals in environmental samples have been measured by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) under highly controlled laboratory conditions. Because of their bulky size, high cost, and long analysis time, these methods are not suitable for on-site environmental screening analysis [3]. Alter- natively, stripping analysis has been widely studied for on-site measurement of heavy metal ions [48]. In the stripping analy- sis, heavy metal ions in the sample solution can be identied and quantied by measuring the generated current at each reduction potential that reduces specic metal ions as the potential sweeps within the appropriate scan range after deposition of heavy metal ions on sensors [911]. In particular, Mercury (Hg) working elec- trodes have shown high sensitivity in measuring heavy metal ions using anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) [1214]. However, the use of toxic Hg as a sensing material for environmental monitoring is limited due to its toxicity to humans and animals. Additionally, the necessity to stir the sample solution and to renew the Hg drop for each measurement makes Hg undesirable for sensing applica- tions [15]. As an alternative, Bismuth (Bi) has been suggested as the 0925-4005/$ see front matter 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2010.11.039 146 W. Jung et al. / Sensors and Actuators B 155 (2011) 145153 working electrode material in ASV to detect various heavy metals in different applications because of its low toxicity while showing similar electrochemical performance to Hg [1621]. However, both amalgam formation of Hg electrodes [22] and multi-component formationof Bi [23] arenot desirableproperties for reusablesensors as some of the heavy metals fused into these electrode materials still remain after ASV leading to memory-effect. Silver (Ag) solid electrodes can be an alternative sensing mate- rial for reusable sensors because the electrodeposition of metals proceeds via the formation of a monolayer of the target metal (underpotential deposition, UPD) on these solid electrodes dur- ing the adsorption process rather than amalgam formation. The electrochemical mechanismof deposition and stripping reaction of lead on the silver electrode surface may be simply represented by equation, Pb 2+ +2e
Pb. As a result, the structure of the electrode
surface remains mainly unchanged during the electrodeposition time, resulting in clear removal of deposited metals based on UPD in conjunction with stripping voltammetry (UPD-SV), and thus providing repeatable results [22]. The Ag electrode has exhib- ited excellent characteristics for heavy metal detections in terms of sensitivity and repeatability [2429]. However, most of this research shows some limitations; for example, they cannot mea- sure micro-volumes of sample andthey needadditional equipment such as a rotator or a stirrer. However, with improved micro- fabrication technologies, planar Ag electrodes can be produced with well-dened patterns at the micro-scale. The ready-to-use Ag working electrode (WE) along with the integrated Ag counter and quasi-reference electrode (CE/QRE) can overcome the above lim- itations. Furthermore, a desirable combination incorporating the miniaturized on-chip electrochemical sensors with microuidic components as a micro total analysis system (microTAS) or lab- on-a-chip device is achievable, which provides a good platform for chemical and biological analyses in a miniaturized format [30,31]. Polymer substrates, such as cyclic olen copolymer (COC), have been used for lab-on-a-chip materials instead of the traditional silicon and glass substrates because of their favorable properties of biocompatibility, high optical transparency, and low cost [32]. Our laboratorydevelopedthe bismuth-baseddisposable sensors on the COC with microfabrication technique for on-site and continu- ous heavy metal ions measurement [3]. However, the automatic sampling and analyzing device [33] was designed for only seven measurements; the seven bismuth-based disposable sensors limit its use for continuous monitoring. For continuous and on-site heavy metal ions measurement, therefore, a reusable heavy metal sensor with on-chip planar Ag WE, integrated Ag CE/QRE, and microuidic channels has been developed by standard microfabrication technology. It could be expected that when the seven developed reusable sensors are equipped on the developed automatic sampling and analyzing device [33], at least three hundred and forty-three consecutive measurements can be achieved without user intervention needed to change sensor chips. This sensor is also suited for very low cost and mass production, small analyte consumption and waste gen- eration, and ease of use. 2. Experimental 2.1. Chemicals All chemicals were of ACS grade and used without further purication. De-ionized (DI) water was used throughout the exper- iments. 70% HNO 3 (pharmco-AAPER, CT, USA) and 99.9995% KCl (Fluka, MO, USA) were used for the preparation of the supporting electrolyte containing 0.01M HNO 3 and 0.01M KCl. Lead stan- dard for the calibration and characterization of the sensor was prepared from 1000ppm stock atomic adoption standard solution (SigmaAldrich Corp., MO, USA). Necessary dilutions were com- pleted with the supporting electrolyte for daily preparation of the standard solutions. Ready-to-use Cyless silver electroplating solu- tion (Technic Inc., RI, USA) was used for Ag electroplating. 0.1mm thick 99.998% Ag foil (Alfa Aesar, MA, USA) was used as an anode to replenish the Ag in solution during Ag electroplating. 96% H 2 SO 4 (pharmco-AAPER, CT, USA) was usedtomake10%H 2 SO 4 for inhibit- ing subsequent tarnishing after Ag electroplating. 2.2. Device fabrication S1818 (MicroChem Corp., MA, USA) positive photoresist was spin-coated and patterned on a COC substrate by the photolithog- raphy technique. On top of the photoresist patterns, a titanium layer of 10nm and a silver layer of 100nm were deposited on a three inch blank COC substrate using an e-beam metal evaporator (Temescal FC1800, BOC Edwards Temescal, CA, USA). The unde- sired patterns of electrodes were lifted-off by acetone to obtain the designed structures. Another silver (1.7m) layer was deposited on the patterned electrodes using the electroplating method. After plating and dragging out, the device was dipped into 10% H 2 SO 4 for 30s to inhibit subsequent tarnishing. It was then rinsed and dried. There were not any mechanical pretreatment steps after the electroplating. Rapid prototyping methods [34] and plastic injection molding were used for high throughput polymer uidic chip fabrication. After drilling holes for uidic interconnection at the inlet and out- let using a micro drill bit, the microuidic chip was bonded with the sensor chip using the thermoplastic fusion bonding technique using an embossing machine (MTP-10, Tetrahedron Associates Inc., CA, USA) to make the nal device. The standard microfabrication processes used for making the miniaturized lead sensor are sum- marized in Fig. 1. Photographs of the fabricated device are shown in Fig. 2, which illustrates the two-electrode conguration, electrical connections, and microchannels. Inorder to maximize the area of the Ag CE/QRE, the dimensions of the Ag CE/QRE are the same as the dimensions of the uidic channel. Details of the Ag WE and Ag CE/QRE are illus- trated in Fig. 2(a). The Ag WE has a length of 22.5mm, width of 100mand a spacing of 100mto the Ag CE/QRE. The Ag CE/QRE, which has been used as a wire form in most prior literature, is integrated into the sensor chip. In order to enable a two-electrode conguration [24], the area of the Ag CE/QRE was set to around 50mm 2 , which is more than 20 times to the area of the Ag WE. The fabricated sensor after PR lift-off is shown in Fig. 2(b) followed by Ag electroplating resulting in a 1.7-m thick sensor as shown in Fig. 2(c). The injection-molded uidic chip has 220m deep u- idic channels as shown in Fig. 2(d). Fig. 2(e) shows the nal sensor chip after the fusion bonding between the sensor chip and the u- idic chip. The entire chip size is 3cm2cm, and the total sample volume that the chip can accommodate is 13.5L. Thus, the pro- posedfullyintegratedpolymer microuidic chipenables signicant reduction of analyte consumption and waste generation. Addition- ally, the sensor chip did not need to be stored in buffer solution to avoid possible sensor deterioration since the sensor was covered with the microuidic chip after bonding. 2.3. Apparatus PalmSens (Palm Instruments BV, The Netherlands), a com- mercial portable electrochemical analyzer, was used for the electrochemical measurements. PSTrace (version 1.4.) software provided by Palm Instruments BV was used for the characteriza- tion of the microfabricated sensors. Because the fabricated sensor employs a two-electrode conguration, the counter electrode clip W. Jung et al. / Sensors and Actuators B 155 (2011) 145153 147 Fig. 1. The summary of the fabrication processes for the sensor chip (I) and the uidic chip (II), respectively. andthe reference electrode clipof the PalmSens are shortedto each other. For measurements, the working electrode clip is simply con- nected to the Ag WE contact pad while the counter and reference electrode clip is connected to the Ag CE/QRE contact pad as shown in Fig. 2(f). The measured output was transferred to a personal computer via Bluetooth and displayed from the PSTrace software as shown in Fig. 2(g). All measurements were taken in unstirred and non-deoxygenating solutions. Experiments were carried out at room temperature to eliminate any temperature effect. 2.4. Procedure The analysis was performed without removal of oxygen using 13.5L of solution containing 10mM HNO 3 and 10mM KCl. A Fig. 2. (a) The schematic illustration of the reusable on-chip heavy metal sensor using microfabricated Ag electrodes, (b) the sensor electrode is composed of 10nm Ti and 100nm Ag after PR lift-off, (c) the sensor electrode after Ag electroplating gets 1.7m thick Ag, (d) the uidic chip after injection molding, (e) the entire chip including the senor and the microuidic channel, (f) the potentiostat along with the chip for the measurement, and (g) the display of the measurement plot shown on the personal computer with PSTrace software. 148 W. Jung et al. / Sensors and Actuators B 155 (2011) 145153 Fig. 3. The reproducibility of the background current on the base of SWASV curves at anAg electrode innon-deaeratedsupporting electrolyte (0.01MHNO 3 and0.01M KCl) recorded in successive electrochemical activation of the Ag electrode. pipetter (Fisher Scientic, PA, USA) was used for sample loading to the inlet port of the microuidic chip. Sample solutions were then injected into the sensing chamber via the inlet channel. The deposition step was E dep =0.75V for 300s vs. Ag QRE. There was no stirring during the deposition time. Conditions for the square- wave anodic stripping voltammetry (SWASV) are as follows: pulse amplitude, 23mV; step amplitude, 3mV; step frequency, 23Hz; E begin =0.75V; E end =0.2V vs. Ag QRE. After each measurement, 0.2V was applied for electrochemical cleaning of any remaining Pb(II) after thestrippingstep. Then, a newtest solutionwas inserted for another measurement. 3. Results and discussion 3.1. Inuence of electrochemical activation on background current Fig. 3 illustrates the changes of the background current in the Ag WE during electrochemical activation. The voltammograms were recorded in non-deaerated supporting electrolyte. The quality of the Ag WE surface did not look stable for curves 13, which exhib- ited high background current with rapid changes in the region of Pb(II) peak current. Low and stable background level (curves 46) was achieved with the consequent electrochemical activation of the electrode. At this point, Ag WE indicated excellent activity for the detection of Pb(II) with high sensitivity, stability and long-life. 3.2. Effect of SWASV parameters Optimal parameters of the SWASVtechnique were chosenbased on iterative trials. The best results with regard to precision, repro- ducibility, andthe signal tobackgroundcurrent ratiowere obtained with a pulse frequency of 23Hz, and this was the value chosen for further work. The higher frequency did not give the distinguishable left shoulder of the lead peak. Rather, the left shoulder of the peak started from 0.75V, which is the E begin , and increased until the peak of the current, resulting in inaccurate peak currents. As pulse frequency was lowered, the starting point of the left shoulder of the peak decreased from the E begin to ca. 0.6V. However, when the pulse frequency was lower than 23Hz, the signal became very coarse like the teeth of a saw, resulting in poor resolution as shown in Fig. 4(a). Changes of the step potential (E step ) caused increase of the peak current by ca. 10%for Pb(II), from2to3mVanddecrease of the peak current by ca. 7% for Pb(II), from 3 to 10mV as shown in Fig. 4(b). Therefore, the step potential of 3mV was applied for the highest peak current. The best results were obtained for the pulse amplitude (E ampl ) of 20mV. At higher pulse amplitudes (>20mV), higher lead peak current was achieved. However, higher pulse amplitudes caused major growth of the background current. On the other hand, lower pulse amplitudes (<20mV) caused a slightly wider width of the peak at half-height height with some distortion in the peak point as shown in Fig. 4(c). As the deposition time and potential are also crucial parameters to govern the SWASV measurement, the optimum deposition time has to be properly chosen. The deposition time in this experiment has been selected by looking at the slope between 1ppb and 10ppb when the deposition time is 180, 240, and 300s, respectively. Addi- tionally, the peak current in blank solution has to be detected by the analyzer in order to nd out the limit of detection. As a result, deposition time of 300s seemed optimal with higher slope while the peak current in blank could be detected as shown in Fig. 5. The deposition potential has been selected as 0.75V based on the literatures [2429], which use the deposition potential from 0.8 to 0.65V and the overall shape of SWASV curve showing that the left shoulder of the current peak starts from more positive potential than the 0.75V. The chosen potential nally provided the high linearity over the large dynamic range in the sensor. 3.3. Square wave anodic stripping voltammetry (SWASV) for Pb(II) analysis SWASV is one of the most frequently used methods in ASV as it greatly reduces background noise coming from the charging cur- rent duringthe potential scan[14]. As anexample, Pb(II) at different concentrations was measured in the standard solutions with sup- porting electrolyte using the proposed sensor. Unlike for the bismuth electrode fabricated ex situ [3], the silver electrode was not affected by natural oxidation and surface con- tamination during storage. In addition, the natural oxidation and surface contamination are further impeded by covering the sen- sor with the bonded uidic chip. Thus, there was no need to have a protection layer such as photoresist on top of the sensor after fabri- cation in order to preserve the sensitivity and reproducibility of the silver electrode. This makes the sensor preparation much simpler because there are no additional steps to remove such a protection layer before measurements. Initially, buffer solution was injected into the sensing chamber through the inlet by a pipetter for electrochemical activation of the sensor. Another advantage of the silver electrode is that there was no need to provide time for stabilizing the open circuit potential between the working and reference electrodes, which indicates an equilibrium time for the integrated Ag QRE is not necessary. Dis- solved oxygen in the sample solution did not need to be removed because SWASV is known to be insensitive to the oxygen level, and Ag electrodes are also less susceptible to oxygen background interferences [22]. The stable background signal was achieved after ve cycles of SWASV in buffer solution, as shown in Fig. 3. After the activa- tion step, the previously used buffer solution was removed from the sensing chamber via the outlet and 13.5L of the appropri- ate Pb(II) standard solution was injected into the sensing chamber. First, 1ppb of Pb(II) standard solution was consecutively measured seven times. After each measurement, 0.2V potential vs. Ag QRE was applied for 20s to remove any remaining Pb(II) on the sur- W. Jung et al. / Sensors and Actuators B 155 (2011) 145153 149 Fig. 4. (a) The SWASV plots when the frequency was 20, 23, 50Hz. (b) Plots when the step potential was 2, 3, 6, 10mV. (c) Plots when the pulse amplitude was 15, 20, 25mV. The SWASV plots were recorded in non-deaerated supporting electrolyte with 1ppb of Pb(II) performed under conditions: E dep =0.75V, t dep =120s, E begin =0.75V, E end =0.2V. Fig. 5. The plots showing the peak currents and the slopes between 1ppb and 10ppb of Pb(II) when the deposition time is 180, 240, and 300s. When the deposition time was 300s, the slope was 66nA/ppb while the slopes were 56nA/ppb and 39nA/ppb when the deposition time was 180s and 240s, respectively. The plots are recorded under conditions dened in Section 2.4. 150 W. Jung et al. / Sensors and Actuators B 155 (2011) 145153 Fig. 6. (a) Calibration plot from 1ppb to 1000ppb for Pb(II). (b) Plots for Pb(II) at 1, 40, 100, 200, 500, 1000ppb. (c) Enlarged calibration plot from 1ppb to 40ppb for Pb(II). (d) Plots for Pb(II) at 1, 5, 10, 20, 40ppb. The SWASV plots were recorded in non-deaerated supporting electrolyte performed under conditions: E dep =0.75V, t dep =300s, E begin =0.75V, E end =0.2V, Estep =3mV, E ampl =20mV, Freq =23Hz. face of the sensor. After the electrochemical cleaning step, new solution was injected for each measurement. After the seventh measurement with 1ppb of Pb(II) standard solution, 5ppb of Pb(II) standardsolutionwas injectedfor the eighthconsecutive measure- ment. The measurements with 5ppb of Pb(II) standard solutions were conducted seven times in a row. Consecutively, peak currents at 10, 20, 40, and 100ppb of Pb(II) standard solution were mea- sured, ve times at each concentration. At 200, 500, and 1000ppb of Pb(II) standard solution, three replicate measurements were implemented at each concentration. The time for electrochemical cleaning step was increased from20s to 60s to have more time for removal of higher concentrations of Pb(II) on the surface at 200, 500, and 1000ppb of Pb(II) standard solutions. The total of forty- three measurements were done consecutively over 8h. Without baseline correctionsuchas backgroundsubtraction, SWASVs at dif- ferent Pb(II) concentrations (11000ppb) are shown in Fig. 6(b) and (d). Good peak shapes were obtained with the peak poten- tial at 0.479V versus the integrated Ag QRE. The corresponding calibration plot for Pb(II) was linear over the range of 11000ppb (R 2 =0.999) with the limit of detection of 0.55ppb as shown in Fig. 6(a). The sensitivity is 28.22nA/ppb at the deposition time of 300s. 3.4. Interferences Silver electrode has been used in detecting not only Pb(II) but also Cd(II) while showing the good selectivity between two ana- lytes with good linearity [26,27,29]. This selectivity over Cd(II) in detecting Pb(II) was investigated by examining the effect of co- existing Cd(II) on the response for Pb(II) with 20ppb of Pb(II) and 40ppb of Cd(II). The results showed the clear separation between the two current peaks of Pb(II) and Cd(II) as shown in Fig. 7. The peak current of the 20ppb Pb(II) decreased 8.3% when there was Fig. 7. Theplots showingthepeakcurrents of 20ppbPb(II), 40ppbCd(II), and20ppb Pb(II) +40ppb Cd(II). The plots are recorded under conditions dened in Section 2.4 except the deposition time of 120s. W. Jung et al. / Sensors and Actuators B 155 (2011) 145153 151 Fig. 8. Peak currents on the proposed sensor during forty-three consecutive measurements at each concentration from 1ppb to 1000ppb of Pb(II). Fig. 9. Stable peak potentials onthe proposedsensor during forty-three consecutive measurements. 40ppb Cd(II) on the solution while there was no change in the peak potentials of Pb(II). 3.5. Reusability of the sensor There are two mainobstacles preventing the bismuthelectrode- based sensor chip from being reused. One is the memory-effect on the electrode because of the formation of multi-component Bi alloys with numerous heavy metals. Thus, even after the anodic stripping and electrochemical cleaning steps, heavy metals still remain inside the electrodes. This memory effect could be avoided by utilizing the UPD-SV on silver electrodes. As a proof, forty-three consecutivemeasurements, from1ppbto1000ppbPb(II), wererun to characterize the reusability of the silver sensors fabricated on polymer lab-on-a-chip for lead detection. As described above, seven measurements were done at each concentration of 1, 1, and 5ppb of Pb(II) standard solutions. Five measurements were consecutively done at each concentration of 10, 20, 40, and 100ppb of Pb(II) standard solutions followed by three measurements at each concentration of 200, 500, and 1000ppb of Pb(II) standard solutions. Peak currents fromthe forty- three consecutive measurements are shown in Fig. 8(a) (140ppb) and Fig. 8(b) (1001000ppb). At the concentrations of Pb(II) which are higher than 20ppb, the relative standard deviations were less than 3% indicating there was no remaining Pb(II) on the Ag WE, as a result of the characteristics of UPD-SV. A second reason preventing the bismuth electrode-based sen- sor chip from being reused is the short life-time of the integrated Ag/AgCl reference electrode. Because of the relatively thin Ag and AgCl layers, which are both less than 100nm, the Ag/AgCl refer- ence electrode quickly loses its functionality. This problem could be resolved by increasing the thickness of the Ag QRE to ca. 1.7m and enlarging the surface area of the Ag QRE. As a result of doing this, the peak potentials in forty-three consecutive measurements, plotted in Fig. 9, showed a standard deviation (STD) of 0.005V and a relative standard deviation (RSTD) of 1.0%. When there were no additional Ag electroplating steps, the initial 0.1m thick Ag QRE after Ag e-beamevaporation was dissolved away in less than 5min. The better performance of the silver electrode has been spec- ulated to be due to continuous surface renewal on the working electrode during the electrodeposition step, as silver ions dissolved Fig. 10. (a) Pictures of sensors taken every 2h during 8-h long measurements. (b) Quantitative values of Ag WE and Ag CE/QRE in gray scale from0 to 255 analyzed in ImageJ software. 152 W. Jung et al. / Sensors and Actuators B 155 (2011) 145153 at the counter silver electrode are uniformly redeposited. This phenomenon is attributed to the large current during the elec- trodeposition step, the close proximity between the counter and the working electrodes, and the nite rate of the precipitation reac- tion of Ag + +Cl
AgCl resulting in movement of part of the silver
ions toward the working electrode before precipitation [25]. This phenomenon was clearly observed in the experiment; shortening the distance between the counter and the working electrodes to 100m expedited the transport of the silver ions from Ag CE/QRE to Ag WE. Photographs taken every 2h from the initial status of the sensor to 8h showed that the surface quality of the working electrode was maintained during the 8h of the experiment due to the surface renewal phenomenon. For quantitative measurements, the photographs of the Ag WE and the Ag CE/QRE were analyzed by ImageJ software (National Institute of Health) to evaluate the change of the brightness in the Ag WE and the Ag CE/QRE over time. As shown in Fig. 10, it was experimentally veried that the Ag WE maintained its brightness during the forty-three consecu- tive experiments while the Ag CE/QRE decreased its brightness due to the formation of silver chloride. 4. Conclusions This paper characterized newAg electrodes used for continuous heavy metal detections on polymer lab-on-a-chips. This solid- state sensor provides reusability with effective detection of the stable peak potentials for on-site SWASV measurement of heavy metal ions in non-deaerated solutions without generating toxic waste. Microfabrication technology has been utilized to realize a new fully integrated sensor with planar Ag working electrode, Ag counter/quasi-reference electrode and microuidic channel. The stable peak potentials and the dynamic response over the three orders of magnitude concentration range, from 1ppb to 1000ppb, for forty-three consecutive measurements establish the sensors reusability, thereby greatly minimizing the analysts labor needed for sensor change, and for reduction in waste generation from the sensors themselves, making them more environmental friendly. Thus, the simple sensor structure and the detection scheme t best for detecting trace metal from on-site environmental samples. Acknowledgements This work was supported by the National Institute of Environ- mental Health Sciences (NIEHS, R01 ES015446) in the National Institute of Health (NIH). The authors thank Mr. Ron Flenniken in theInstitutefor NanoscaleScienceandTechnologyat theUniversity of Cincinnati for his technical support regarding Ag evaporation, andalsothankMr. Kees vanVelzenfor his technical support regard- ing the PalmSens and PSTrace operation. References [1] A. Jang, Y.W. Seo, P.L. Bishop, The removal of heavy metals in urban runoff by sorption on mulch, Environ. Pollut. 133 (2005) 117128. [2] M.F.M. Noh, I.E. Tothill, Development and characterisation of disposable gold electrodes, and their use for lead (II) analysis, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 386 (2006) 20952106. [3] Z. Zou, A. Jang, E. MacKnight, P-M. Wu, J. Do, P.L. Bishop, C.H. Ahn, Environmen- tally friendly disposable sensors with microfabricated on-chip planar bismuth electrode for in situ heavy metal ions measurement, Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 134 (2008) 1824. [4] E.P. Achterberg, C. Braungardt, Stripping voltammetry for the determination of trace metal speciation and in-situ measurements of trace metal distributions in marine waters, Anal. Chim. Acta 400 (1999) 381397. [5] D. Desmond, B. Lane, J. Alderman, M. Hill, D.W.M. Arrigan, J.D. Glennon, Anenvi- ronmental monitoring system for trace metals using stripping voltammetry, Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 48 (1998) 409414. [6] Kh.Z. Brainina, N.A. Malakhova, N.Yu. Stojko, Stripping voltammetry in envi- ronmental and food analysis, Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 368 (2000) 307325. [7] K.C. Honeychurch, J.P. Hart, D.C. Cowell, D.W.M. Arrigan, Voltammetric studies of lead at calixarene modied screen-printed carbon electrodes and its trace determination in water by stripping voltammetry, Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 77 (2001) 642652. [8] E. Shams, R. Torabi, Determination of nanomolar concentrations of cadmium by anodic-stripping voltammetry at a carbon paste electrode modied with zirconium phosphated amorphous silica, Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 117 (2006) 8692. [9] S.B. Saban, R.B. Darling, Multi-element heavy metal ion sensors for aqueous solutions, Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 61 (1999) 128137. [10] I. Yanagimachi, N. Nashida, K. Iwasa, H. Suzuki, Detection of heavy-metal ions based on evaporative concentration using a super-hydrophobic surface, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 6 (2005) 671677. [11] S. Laschi, I. Palchetti, M. Mascini, Gold-based screen-printed sensor for detec- tion of trace lead, Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 114 (2006) 460465. [12] R.J. Reay, A.F. Flannery, C.W. Storment, S.P. Kounaves, G.T.A. Kovacs, Microfabri- cated electrochemical analysis system for heavy metal detection, Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 34 (1996) 450455. [13] J.Y. Choi, K. Seo, S.R. Cho, J.R. Oh, S.H. Kahng, J. Park, Screen-printed anodic stripping voltammetric sensor containing HgO for heavy metal analysis, Anal. Chim. Acta 443 (2001) 241247. [14] X. Zhu, C. Gao, J.W. Choi, P.L. Bishop, C.H. Ahn, On-chip generated mercury microelectrode for heavy metal ion detection, Lab. Chip 5 (2005) 212217. [15] G. Billon, C.M.G. van den Berg, Gold and silver micro-wire electrodes for trace analysis metals, Electroanalysis 16 (2004) 15831591. [16] J. Wang, J. Lu, S.B. Hocevar, P.A.M. Farias, Bismuth-coated carbon electrodes for anodic stripping voltammetry, Anal. Chem. 72 (2000) 32183222. [17] G. Kefala, A. Economou, A. Voulgaropoulos, M. Sofoniou, A study of bismuth- lm electrodes for the detection of trace metals by anodic stripping voltammetry and their application to the determination of Pb and Zn in tap- water and human hair, Talanta 61 (2003) 603610. [18] D. Demetriades, A. Economou, A. Voulgaropoulos, A study of pencil-lead bismuth-lm electrodes for the determination of trace metals by anodic strip- ping voltammetry, Anal. Chim. Acta 519 (2004) 167172. [19] A. Economou, Bismuth-lmelectrodes: recent developments andpotentialities for electroanalysis, Trends Anal. Chem. 24 (2005) 334340. [20] I. Svancara, L. Baldrianova, E. Tesarova, S.B. Hocevar, S.A.A. Elsuccary, A. Economou, S. Sotiropoulos, B. Ogorevc, K. Vytras, Recent advances in anodic stripping voltammetry with bismuth-modied carbon paste electrodes, Elec- troanalysis 18 (2006) 177185. [21] L. Baldrianova, I. Svancara, S. Sotiropoulos, Anodic stripping voltammetry at a new type of disposable bismuth-plated carbon paste mini-electrodes, Anal. Chim. Acta 599 (2007) 249255. [22] G. Herzog, D.W.M. Arrigan, Determination of trace metals by underpotential depositionstripping voltammetry at solid electrodes, Trends Anal. Chem. 24 (2005) 208217. [23] J. Wang, Stripping, Analysis at bismuth electrodes: a review, Electroanalysis 17 (2005) 13411346. [24] M. Brand, I. Eshkenazi, E. Kirowa-Eisner, The silver electrode in square-wave anodic stripping voltammetry. Determination of Pb 2+ without removal of oxy- gen, Anal. Chem. 69 (1997) 46604664. [25] E. Kirowa-Eisner, M. Brand, D. Tzur, Determination of sub-nanomolar concen- trations of lead by anodic-stripping voltammetry at the silver electrode, Anal. Chim. Acta 385 (1999) 325335. [26] Y. Bonl, E. Kirowa-Eisner, Determination of nanomolar concentrations of lead and cadmium by anodic-stripping voltammetry at the silver electrode, Anal. Chim. Acta 457 (2002) 285296. [27] Y. Bonl, M. Brand, E. Kirowa-Eisner, Characteristics of subtractive anodic strip- ping voltammetry of Pb and Cd at silver and gold electrodes, Anal. Chim. Acta 464 (2002) 99114. [28] B. Bas, The renovated silver ring electrode, Electrochem. Commun. 10 (2008) 156160. [29] B. Bas, M. Jakubowska, M. Jez, F. Ciepiela, Novel renovated silver ring electrode for anodic stripping analysis of Pb(II) andCd(II) traces inwater samples without removal of oxygen and surfactants, J. Electroanal. Chem. 638 (2010) 38. [30] A. Manz, N. Graber, H.M. Widmer, Miniaturizedtotal chemical analysis systems: a novel concept for chemical sensing, Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1 (1990) 244248. [31] I. Grabowska, M. Sajnoga, M. Juchniewicz, M. Chudy, A. Dybko, Z. Brzozka, Microuidic systemwithelectrochemical andoptical detection, Microelectron. Eng. 84 (2007) 17411743. [32] C.H. Ahn, J.W. Choi, G. Beaucage, J.H. Nevin, J.B. Lee, A. Puntambekar, J.Y. Lee, Disposable smart lab on a chip for point-of-care clinical diagnostics, Proc. IEEE 92 (2004) 154173. [33] Z. Zou, A. Jang, E.T. MacKnight, P-M. Wu, J. Do, J.S. Shim, P.L. Bishop, C.H. Ahn, An on-site heavy metal analyzer with polymer lab-on-a-chips for continuous sampling and monitoring, IEEE Sens. J. 9 (2009) 586594. [34] A.W. Browne, M.J. Rust, W. Jung, S.H. Lee, C.H. Ahn, Arapid prototyping method for polymer microuidics with xed aspect ratio and 3Dtapered channels, Lab. Chip 9 (2009) 29412946. Biographies Wooseok Jung received his BS degree in biomedical engineering from Yonsei University, Korea, in 2006. He is currently working toward the Ph.D. degree in elec- W. Jung et al. / Sensors and Actuators B 155 (2011) 145153 153 trical engineering at the University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA. Mr. Jungs research interests focus on BioMEMS, micro total analysis system (microTAS) and lab-on-a-chip, microuidics, miniaturized electrochemical sensors, and a closed micro-volume blood sampling device. Am Jang is currently research assistant professor at the University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA. He joined the Department of Civil and Environmental Engi- neering, University of Cincinnati in 2003 as a post-doctoral fellow. He received his PhD from the Gwangju Institute Science and Technology (GIST), South Korea in 2002. His current research interests are to monitor soil biolms contaminated with heavy metals and to develop portable heavy metal sensors using lab-on-a-chip technologies. Paul L. Bishop is currently the Environmental Engineering Program Director at the National Science Foundation. He is alsothe Associate Vice President for Researchand Professor of Environmental Engineering at the University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA. He received his PhD in 1972 from Purdue University, USA. His current research interests are measuring the impacts of in situ environmental conditions on biodegradation of toxic chemicals in biolm treatment processes and polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soils at Superfund sites. Chong H. Ahn received the PhD degree in electrical and computer engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, in 1993. From 1993 to 1994, he was a Postdoctoral Associate with the Georgia Institute of Technology and then with the IBM T.J. Watson Research Center. In 1994, he joined the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Computer Science, University of Cincin- nati, Cincinnati, OH, as an Assistant Professor and is currently a Professor with the Microsystems and BioMEMS Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and the Department of Biomedical Engineering. He is also the Director of the Center for BioMEMS andNanobiosystems. He is currentlya member of the Edi- torial Board of the Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, Microuidics and Nanouidics, and Small. He has published approximately 300 journal and peer reviewed conference proceedings papers related to microelectromechanical sys- tems, bioMEMS, microuidics, and lab-on-a-chip areas. He is the holder of four U.S. patents. His research interests include the design, fabrication, and characterization of nanostructures and nanobiosensors, magnetic sensors, magnetic MEMS/NEMS devices, magnetic nano bead-based immunoassays, microuidic devices and sys- tems, BioMEMS/NEMS devices, plastic based disposable biochips, point-of-care blood analyzers, portable biochemical detection systems, protein chips, lab on a chip, and biophotonic devices. Dr. Ahn is a Co-chair and Organizer of several inter- national conferences on MEMS/NEMS and BioMEMS/NEMS. In addition, he served on the programcommittee of numerous international conferences on microsensors, BioMEMS, and MEMS, including the IEEE International Conference on Microelec- tromechanical Systems (MEMS) and the International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators (TRANSDUCERS). He has presented numerous invited talks in several international conferences. From2003 to 2004, he was an Associate Editor for the IEEE Sensors Journal. He is currently a Subject Editor of the IEEE/ASME Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems (JMEMS).