Recognizing the need for standards to support electronic data exchange, we have created: A standard for the exchange of claims data among trading partners An industrywide data element dictionary for policy data that can be used as a tool to develop data exchange standards
OVERVIEW
To communicate effectively, people have developed many languagesspoken and unspokenand bridges linking these languages. Components of a language are a flexible, commonly understood vocabulary and supporting rules for grammar and syntax. Comprehensive dictionaries are tools commonly used to document word definitions and build bridges across languages.
The principal means of communication within the insurance industrythe exchange of datais lacking a common vocabulary (data element definitions) and associated business rules. This has added significant time and expense to the overall process of data exchange while having a negative impact on the quality of data.
For decades, industry, government, and national consensus groups have been meeting both jointly and independently to discuss the coding, processing and reporting of insurance data. The complex systems now in use affect many diverse groups, both in the private and public sectors. Unilateral decisions or actions to change or adopt one system over another may result in conflicts among groups and impose additional administrative burdens. Uniform coding systems can only be developed when there is collaboration, consensus, and incentives for the parties involved in the process.
Now there appear to be financial, data quality, and utility incentives for the adoption of uniform coding systems and data exchange standards. With electronic commerce and the automation of insurance processes, diverse groups can jointly determine which systems provide uniformity and standardization in the coding and electronic transmission of insurance data.
There have been many efforts geared toward the development of data and data exchange standards. Industry organizations involved in these efforts include: American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ACORD International Association of Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions (IAIABC) Workers Compensation Insurance Organizations (WCIO) Risk and Insurance Management Society (RIMS) UN/EDIFACT WISe (World InSurance e-commerce Insurance Data Management Association IDMA TPA Data Standards White Paper
TPAwhitepaper1.doc Page 2 of 8 November 7, 2000
BACKGROUND
In 1999, the Insurance Data Management Associations Executive Committee approved the creation of a Data Standards Committee. The Committees task is to support the development of data and data quality standards by: Being a clearinghouse for information regarding data standards development Providing an environment under which data standards work groups can function (where none currently exists) Encouraging the development of open standards Providing a vehicle for feedback on data standards and activities Identifying resources and volunteers
To address the lack of claim data exchange standards for third party administrators (TPAs) and insurers, a TPA Data Standards Work Group was also created. The task of this work group is to discuss an initiative to develop industry standards (implementation guide) for the exchange of premium and loss data between interested parties including TPAs, service providers, technology vendors, insurers, insureds, brokers (not encompassing the reporting of data to statistical agents and regulators).
Once the work group settled on working parameters, two subgroups were created to separately address policy and claim issues.
These collaborative efforts resulted in two products: IDMA Claims Data Exchange Standard IDMA Policy Data Element Dictionary
IDMA TPA Data Standards White Paper
TPAwhitepaper1.doc Page 3 of 8 November 7, 2000 WORK PRODUCTS
IDMA CLAIMS DATA EXCHANGE STANDARD Representatives from insurance carriers, third party administrators, service providers and vendors met to address the issue of reducing the cost of claims data exchange. They formed a work group of the Insurance Data Management Association to develop an industry standard for the transfer of claims data. Open-invitation industry meetings were held. In addition, feedback was gained from clients and other industry groups. The final product of the work group is an implementation guide.
Intended to become the basis for improved data exchange between interested parties, this guide includes: A data dictionary Code tables compiled specifically for this guide Reference to code tables adopted from other sources Record layouts in three formats: flat file, ANSI X12N, and XML
The range of data, which includes all commercial lines of insurance, will enable the trading partners to exchange information for various purposes. The trading partners include, but are not limited to: Third party administrators Insurance carriers Brokers Self-insureds Insureds
The information required for claim handling that is exchanged between the trading partners may include account/policy/employer information and claim information. Claim information includes: Financial amounts at the summary and transactional levels Descriptive narratives for loss reporting Data required for statistical or regulatory reporting Claim information necessary for loss control This standard does not intend to duplicate existing standards.
IDMA POLICY DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY Because many standards for the exchange of policy data exist, the work group concentrated on documenting existing data element specifications instead of developing new data standards. The resultant Policy Data Element Dictionary is a compilation of the information that may be exchanged among various trading partners throughout the insurance industry. This dictionary, however, is not intended to replace industry source documents, which should be referenced if additional information is needed. While the initial draft addresses commercial lines data elements defined by the Workers Compensation Insurance Organizations (an organization of workers compensation data collection organizations) and the Insurance Services Office, the intent is eventually to include all data elements currently defined in the industry. This dictionary is intended to be a part of other, more global industry initiatives aimed at the implementation of straight through processing. IDMA TPA Data Standards White Paper
TPAwhitepaper1.doc Page 4 of 8 November 7, 2000
IDMA POLICY DATA EXCHANGE STANDARD (to be developed) To address the need to exchange the policy data necessary to establish a claim, the work group intends to identify these data elements, develop standards, and add this information as a separate section of the Claims Data Exchange Standard. IDMA TPA Data Standards White Paper
TPAwhitepaper1.doc Page 5 of 8 November 7, 2000 VALUE STATEMENTS
The benefits of transmission standards and processes include: Improved time to market for new trading partners More efficient and effective systems for all entities Reduced maintenance costs Increased flexibility to exchange data with new trading partners Increased customer satisfaction Increased data utility Quicker solutions to data management problems Access to additional data Improved and consistent data quality Streamlined data exchange processes Compatibility with e-commerce strategies and technologies Compatibility with straight-through-processing concepts
OBSTACLES
The following issues need to be addressed: Economic incentives to offset the cost of adopting new standards The impact on legacy systems Competitive advantages of proprietary coding systems Data ownership, maintenance and control issues Trading partners trade secret concerns Data confidentiality and privacy issues associated with increased access to data IDMA TPA Data Standards White Paper
TPAwhitepaper1.doc Page 6 of 8 November 7, 2000 GUIDING PRINCIPLES
1. Open Standards Where possible, only data standards open to all interested parties were used.
2. Public Domain It is intended that these work products be in the public domain and that they may be used without paying royalties.
3. Insurance Acceptance Where possible, these data standards were based on known industry standards.
4. Statistical Robustness Where adequate data standards do not currently exist, additional data standards have been developed.
5. Widespread Acceptance Usage Where possible, the most widespread/all encompassing data standards were referenced.
6. Receptivity and Collaboration Where redundant or conflicting data standards currently exist, the Policy Work Group encourages the development of universal data standards by documenting known redundancies and conflicts.
7. Timely Updates Where necessary, these standards will be maintained and updated on a timely basis. Maintenance of the Policy Data Element Dictionary may depend on the work of the defining entities.
8. Intellectual Products Where these data standards reference proprietary or copyrighted materials, only reference to these materials are made. The appropriate defining entities must be contacted for access to proprietary or copyrighted materials.
IDMA TPA Data Standards White Paper
TPAwhitepaper1.doc Page 7 of 8 November 7, 2000
CONCLUSIONS
By following the Groups recommendations and using these products:
1. Duplication, overlap, and mapping of data elements and data element values are significantly reduced.
2. Significant cost savings are achieved by using a single reporting format to gather similar data, enhancing comparability and data analyses, and simplifying data collection processes.
3. Coded data become uniform under this format because everyone will be using the same data schemes for the collection and distribution of any given set of data. Closer communication between all participants will encourage the development and adoption of universal data standards and standardized language for reports and data analyses.
4. The use of standard language for the reporting and discussions of insurance data facilitates communication between the many industries and interested parties.
Ultimately, the insured, the insurer, the public, regulatory authorities, intermediaries, and the vendor community benefit from the implementation of these recommendations.
IDMA TPA Data Standards White Paper
TPAwhitepaper1.doc Page 8 of 8 November 7, 2000
GROUP MEMBERS
Katherine Burns, Claim Regulations/Special Projects Coordinator, Kemper Insurance Rose Castro, AVP Commercial Lines Data Management, The Hartford Gerard Chiorazzo, Assistant Director, American International Group Carol F. Eskola, AVP Data Management, Crawford and Company Jeanie Griffith, Business Analyst External Data Services, ACE-USA Beth Grossman, Director of Industry Relations, ACORD Gary W. Knoble, VP Data Management, The Hartford Judy Lachance, Project Leader Special Projects, Liberty Mutual Group Peter Marotta, Principle, Data Management Consulting Co., Insurance Services Office Randy Molnar, Sr. Business Analyst, NCCI Christine Siekierski, Wisconsin Compensation Rating Bureau Jeanette Varkal, Consultant, Trumbull Services Charles E. Wight, Managing Consultant/SVP, Marsh USA Risk and Ins. Services