Write a succinct one paragraph summary of the objectives and conclusions of the paper. Give a little bit of background to why they performed the study. Don't write "they saw some differences in some of the genes!" rather write #"$%& of the 1$"'(% genes on the array were significantly differentially e)pressed!
Write a succinct one paragraph summary of the objectives and conclusions of the paper. Give a little bit of background to why they performed the study. Don't write "they saw some differences in some of the genes!" rather write #"$%& of the 1$"'(% genes on the array were significantly differentially e)pressed!
Write a succinct one paragraph summary of the objectives and conclusions of the paper. Give a little bit of background to why they performed the study. Don't write "they saw some differences in some of the genes!" rather write #"$%& of the 1$"'(% genes on the array were significantly differentially e)pressed!
Your Disussion P!p"r s#ou$% onsis& o' 4 s"&ions( "!# !ppro)i*!&"$+ on" #!$' p!g" o' sing$" sp!"% &")&, You n""% &o -ri&" . P!p"rs in !$$( %u" &#" %!+ o' &#" C$!ss Disussion /no $!&" ")"p&ions -i$$ 0" gr!n&"%1, T#"s" !r" in !%%i&ion &o +our Pos&"r pr"s"n&!&ion( *"!ning &#!& +ou !nno& su0*i& ! r"por& on &#" p!p"r +ou !r" pr"s"n&ing, I' +ou -ro&" ! g"no*" pro2"& propos!$( i& -i$$ su0s&i&u&" 'or on" o' &#"s" Disussion P!p"rs, I' +ou #oos" &o %o *or" &#!n . P!p"rs( I -i$$ gi3" +ou &#" gr!%" 'or &#" . 0"s& on"s +ou -ri&", Section 1. Write a succinct one paragraph summary of the objectives and conclusions of the paper. A good summary is quantitative where appropriate (dont write they saw some differences in some of the genes!" rather write #"$%& of the 1$"'(% genes on the array were found to be significantly differentially e)pressed!*. Also try to give a little bit of bac+ground to why they performed the study" but remember that you are writing scientifically" not for a maga,ine. Writing should be sharp and to the point" not poetic and superficial. Section &. -escribe the wor+ flow of the paper. .ou might even consider drawing out a flow diagram to help you" but convert this into te)t for your paper. /his section should be more than a list of the e)periments they performed0 try to portray the logical connection between the e)periments. 1or e)ample" the authors start by doing 2" which leads them to supect ." so they did 3" which implied A and led them to conclude 4. /his should help you to see the logic of the approach" and if you see a flaw in the logic or feel that the conclusions are unjustified" e)plain why you thin+ that is the case. Section 5. 6ighlight the strenghts and wea+nesses of the paper. .ou ought to be able to pinpoint three of each. Stengths might be that the study developed a new technology" or led to a new model of some process" or was a particularly clever design. Wea+nesses might be that the sample si,e was too small" or that the e)periment was misinterpreted" or that the study was poorly designed. .ou should as+ yourself whether the paper achieved the objective the authors set themselves. /ry to avoid complaining that you did not understand the paper because it was full of jargon or the statistics were too hard for you to follow0 7 e)pect that will often be the case" but usually it is because it is assumed that the papers are written for e)perts. 7f you have something you dont understand" email or as+ me. Section 8. /hin+ of two e)periments that you would propose to follow9up on the paper. -ont just write down the e)periments" e)plain why you would do them and briefly outline what the procedure would be so that they ma+e scientific sense. 7 e)pect that you may come up with some cra,y ideas" and that some of the e)periments will not be feasible. /hat is :; < 7 +now you dont +now enough to be certain about things. 7n this section just be creative and insightful=