8/13/13 11:50 AM What its all about: The war on workers goes to the post office | Save the

Post Office
Page 1 of 7 http://www.savethepostoffice.com/what-its-all-about-war-workers-goes-post-office
Search
Home About Contact News Briefs Recent Posts
What its all about: The war on workers goes
to the post office
View Edit Outline Track
August 14, 2013
BY MARK JAMISON
What if the postal crisis weve read about over the last five years isnt really about saving the
Postal Service after all? What if the story really isnt about an archaic Federal agency
struggling to find a business plan in the face of technological change? Could the real story be
much simpler than that?
Maybe the real story is about changing the basic relationship between employers and
employees in the one sector of our economy where employees have been able to maintain
decent wages and benefits?
Since 1980 wages have been stagnant for most people in the economy. Despite continued
and steady growth in productivity, wages especially for those in the bottom 90% have
lagged by a factor of seven against productivity. Since the early 1990s, wages have
essentially remained flat.
During this same period, traditional pensions have mostly disappeared and been replaced by
401Ks and other plans that shift the risk and responsibility for saving for retirement entirely
to individual workers. As costs of healthcare and insurance premiums have skyrocketed,
workers have been left to bear more of the burden for those costs.
Between wage stagnation and the decreasing value of benefit packages, average workers are
much worse off than they were thirty years ago. During the same period, however, capital
has done extremely well. That wealth gap became even more pronounced after the Great
NEWS BRI EFS NEWS BRI EFS
The Latest News
on the Post
Office
____________________
Sen. Sanders: Congress Must
Not Hobble Postal Service
Rebound

The Nation: Protesters Live
in Tent City to Oppose Post
Office Closure

Undermining the Union in
the Legislative Arena More
Concessions from APWU
President

Berkeley post office protest
NEW FEATURE NEW FEATURE
Check out the new News
Brief page, and subscribe to
the RSS feed.
RECENT POSTS RECENT POSTS
Expiring leases send two San
Diego post offices off for
closure

Theres a fungus among us:
Mold strikes a third Illinois
post office

The Senate does postal
reform: Highlights and low
points of the Carper-Coburn
bill

Save the Post Office
Closures, Consolidations, Suspensions: Stories, Analysis, Opinion
8/13/13 11:50 AM What its all about: The war on workers goes to the post office | Save the Post Office
Page 2 of 7 http://www.savethepostoffice.com/what-its-all-about-war-workers-goes-post-office
Recession.
Those at the top of the pyramid have recovered quite well, while everyone else has gone
sideways or downhill. Corporate profits as a share of GDP are as high as theyve been since
1929. Coincident with all of this is the fact that union membership as a percentage of the
workforce has steadily decreased and is at its lowest level in more than a generation.

Attacking public employees
There is one partial exception to all this bad news and that is the public sector. While
American business and the corporate sector have generally been at war with the American
worker shifting wealth and productivity gains upward rather than distributing them
throughout the economy public-sector workers have retained most of their benefits and
have seen wages at least stay level with inflation.
Paying workers in the public sector a decent wage sets a bad example, so the corporate elite
and the Right have mounted an all-out attack by pushing for cuts in the workforce and cuts in
wages and benefits. One of the reasons unemployment has been so stubborn, even as the
economy improves, is that job gains in the private sector have been offset by job cuts in the
public sector. Head count at the Postal Service is down more than 200,000 since 2005, and
there have been similar losses in Federal, State, and Local governments across the country.
A generation of efforts by American business to erode the share of income flowing to labor
has been successful, and now attention has been turned to the public sector.
The Right has celebrated this war against public employees just as it celebrated the war
against working folks in general. The phony narrative of trickledown economics and tax cuts
for the supposed job creators is a fundamental story of class warfare and redistribution of
wealth upwards. It is the phoniest of narratives because in an economy that relies on
middle-class demand for growth and profits, the stagnation of wages, the degradation of
benefits, and the general attack on labor has hollowed out our middle-class.
As a number of economists have pointed out, our economy is stagnant because we lost over a
trillion dollars of consumer demand, and there is no economic theory that allows for the
replacement of that demand through more tax cuts for the wealthy or corporations.
An economy built on reducing wages and benefits to the lowest levels possible may lead to
Wal-Mart prices and higher corporate profits, but it is a fools bargain that leads to low wage
jobs that cannot sustain sufficient levels of demand to support the economy as a whole. As
the benefits of the economy increasingly accrue to a smaller and smaller group, it becomes
clear that the wealthiest one percent cannot consume enough to sustain growth and general
prosperity.
Whether or not its ultimately a successful strategy, the fact of the matter is that for the last
generation the model has been to suppress wages and benefits in pursuit of higher profits.
And that brings us to the Postal Service.

Exploiting a manufactured crisis
The crisis that confronts the Postal Service is largely manufactured. About 80% of the
accumulated losses of the past six years can be directly attributed to the Retiree Health
Benefit Fund (RHBF) payments mandated by the PAEA. Much of the initial volume losses
incurred in 2007 and 2008 could be attributed to the financial collapse and the ensuing Great
Recession. While its true that postal systems are challenged by the Internet specifically and
technological change more generally, its also true that those challenges are not
insurmountable.
Its hard to argue a counterfactual, but theres a fair amount of evidence to demonstrate
that the steps PMG Donahoe has taken to cut costs combined with a barrage of negative
reporting and a sense of perpetual crisis have driven a good deal of first class mail out of
continues despite warnings
from US Postal Service

________________________
MORE NEWS BRIEFS
RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDED
Why the Post Office
Matters and Why
Corporate America Is
Stealing It
Scam Alert! Press Sleeps
Through the Great Post
Office Fire Sale
The Destruction of the
U.S. Postal Service Is
Quietly Being Delivered to
Madison
Oregon's fight for postal
jobs
Ralph Nader The Plight
of the Postal Service
Blade Runner,
Terminator, Minority
Report and the deliberate
sabotage of the Postal
Service
The collateral damage of
cutting postal service
DI SMANTLI NG A LEGACY DI SMANTLI NG A LEGACY
Articles & Resources on
Historic Post Offices
PRESERVI NG THE PRESERVI NG THE
PEOPLE'S POST OFFI CE PEOPLE'S POST OFFI CE
A Postmaster's View
Posts by Mark Jamison
Going, going, gone: Historic
post offices on the GSA's
auction block

Berkeley mayor files appeal
with the PRC to stop the
closure and sale of his citys
historic post office

More Recent Posts
ON PRI VATI ZATI ON ON PRI VATI ZATI ON
Good Reading on Postal
Privatization
Also: Sarah Ryan's
"Understanding Postal
Privatization: Corporations,
Unions, and the "Public
Interest"
Read about Postal
Privatization in the UK
FEATURED VI DEO FEATURED VI DEO
8/13/13 11:50 AM What its all about: The war on workers goes to the post office | Save the Post Office
Page 3 of 7 http://www.savethepostoffice.com/what-its-all-about-war-workers-goes-post-office
the system. Individuals and businesses are moving to the Internet faster than they might
have, largely out of fear that the mail system will collapse. During several PRC change-of-
service cases (the N dockets), evidence has been presented to show that changes in service
and degradation of the system can lead to significant drops in volume and revenue.
The losses that began in 2007 didnt have to be as bad as they were. There were moderate
steps that could have been taken to mitigate the declining volumes. Certainly modifying or
suspending the RHBF would have made the case simpler. Unfortunately, it served the
interests of those who support our current economic models and trends to make the situation
as bad as possible.
Those who formulated and implemented the scorched-earth policies that kept the Postal
Service in crisis had two basic aims: privatization of public services (i.e., the transfer of
public revenue and assets to the private sector) and, perhaps more importantly, the
destruction of a unionized workforce and the successful benefit programs those workers
depend on.

Breeding envy and resentment
Over the years, weve seen a number of efforts to argue that postal revenues ought to be
privatized. From the minions of Pete Peterson working in the guise of NAPA to the industry
lobbyists of PostCom and various alliances like the GCA, weve heard two arguments
privatize more of the system and reduce the costs of postal labor. Its not hard to see why
those in the corporate world would be motivated to get their hands on the $65 billion in
postal revenues or possibly even the more than $300 billion in employee benefit programs
those transfers would very lucrative.
More important, there are ideologues as well as those in industry who would love nothing
more than to see Federal employee benefit programs eroded or even destroyed. One of their
main strategies is divide-and-conquer sow jealousy and discontent among the populace.
The message is simple: Look at those rich teachers, firemen, postal workers, and all the
benefits and salaries they get. And hey, lets not forget that those benefits and salaries are
paid for with your tax dollars.
I suppose its human nature for many folks to have a knee-jerk reaction to that sort of
pandering propaganda and say, Yeah, why do they get paid so much? Why should I have to
pay them? Its also human nature to think that the other guy doesnt work as hard as you do
or that he received some sort of insider deal to get that cushy public job (never mind that in
most cases those jobs are open to anyone choosing to take a civil service test or go to school
to get the required training to become a teacher).
Still, I dont understand why more folks dont have a sort of never mind the man behind the
curtain moment and ask, Hey, why doesnt my company have a defined benefit pension
anymore? or How come the CEO suddenly makes so much? or What did the hedge fund
accomplish by driving us into bankruptcy?
After the financial crisis, people seemed more concerned that the guy next door might
undeservedly get a little break on his mortgage principle rather than that the banks and
financial institutions that caused the train wreck not only walked away unscathed but
returned to record profits. Its the same sort of mindset that finds a 1% fraud rate in the food
stamp program more horrifying than the fact that large agribusiness and gentlemen farmers
get billions in subsidies even when theyre already very profitable. I suppose its the
American way to elbow your way in front of Mr. Jones next door while dreaming of
bootstrapping yourself into hedge fund wealth.
The same people who screamed that bailing out General Motors was terrible because we
shredded the contracts of the bondholders (in America contracts are sacrosanct) seem to
have no problem arguing that contractual promises to Detroits public employees ought to be
trampled without remorse because the average pension of $19,000 a year is too much for a
CONSOLI DATI ONS CONSOLI DATI ONS
Consolidation Resources
POSTPLAN POSTPLAN
POStPlan Resources Page
NOW ON GOI NG POSTAL NOW ON GOI NG POSTAL
A Slice of the Fourche La
Fave River Valley, Arkansas
A Positive Impact of
POStPlan?
LI STS & MAPS LI STS & MAPS
Lists & Maps on Google Docs
LI NKS & TOPI CS LI NKS & TOPI CS
Topics
News & Blogs
Organizations
Government
Save Our P.O. Sites
ADMI N ADMI N
Build a GMap macro
My account
Node locations
Mr Postman, Our Post
Office Is Not For Sale!
Video Archive
JOI N THE FI GHT JOI N THE FI GHT

Save
America's
Postal Service



Community Labor United for
Postal Jobs and Services

Community and Postal
Workers United

Communities and
Postal Workers United
Newsletter
August 2013
POSTPLAN HANDBOOK POSTPLAN HANDBOOK
Organizing to Save Rural
Post Offices
A Community
Organizing
Toolkit
Revised
November
2012
[pdf doc] [word doc]
Follow Save the Post Office.
8/13/13 11:50 AM What its all about: The war on workers goes to the post office | Save the Post Office
Page 4 of 7 http://www.savethepostoffice.com/what-its-all-about-war-workers-goes-post-office
public employee, even though those folks dont get Social Security. In America, we have a
fundamental respect for property rights, so our word is our bond and a contract is a contract
unless, of course, its a union contract. In that case, it was probably a forcibly-arrived-at
deal with the devil, and theres no reason to respect it.

Undermining model programs
For the last forty years, senior postal management has said, in good times and bad, that in
order for the Postal Service to survive and run efficiently they must have more control over
their workforce. Never mind that postal workers dont have access to the strike as a means
of persuasion. Postal contracts are either negotiated, in which case they are mutually
agreed upon (key word mutually) as beneficial, or they are concluded through binding
arbitration, in which case each side has the opportunity to martial its arguments and
resources to create the best case for its interests. Its a fair and open forum so if your
arguments dont prevail maybe its because they just werent very good arguments.
For decades now, the prevailing view has been to put shareholder interest above and beyond
all other interests. American business has seen labor as merely a cost to be minimized.
Never mind that a poorly paid workforce cant buy the goods and services that American
business seeks to produce.
So the traditional defined-benefit pension was replaced with a defined-contribution program,
which transferred the risk from the group to the individual and created a huge opportunity
for the financial industry to reap greater profits by charging fees to manage each persons
retirement fund. (Another premise of American business has become there are no
customers, only revenue sources ripe for fee extraction.)
Patrick Donahoe says that the only way for the Postal Service to survive is to take employees
out of the Federal benefit systems for both health and retirement. He claims that he can
provide postal employees with the same quality of benefits that they now receive under
those systems. There is no possible scenario in which he can do that, but that really isnt the
point.
What folks like Darrell Issa and right-wing think-tanks and ideologues of the youre on your
own stripe really want is to undermine Federal benefit systems. These programs are a
shining example of the good that government can do, and thats exactly why they need to be
eliminated or grievously weakened.

Putting risk on the individual
Thats the goal, pure and simple undermine the sorts of employee benefit systems that act
as a good example and remove the temptation for people in every sector of the economy to
believe that employers ought to make better bargains with their employees. Undermine
Federal retirement and healthcare systems that work well and are well funded, and other
public employee systems begin to fail as well. The goal, as it has been for at least the last
thirty years, is to seek to find the least common denominator, to pay people as cheaply as
possible and to remove systems that provide people with a fair amount of reward, hope, and
security.
The Federal Employee Retirement System (FERS) covers 2.6 millionworkers, so removing
500,000 postal workers from the system wont destroy it, but it would set a very destructive
example. PMG Donahoe cannot replace the FERS system with anything nearly as effective.
He would move employees to a 401K-type system that shifts all of the risk of investment
onto the individual. Recent studies have shown that 401K plans have not been nearly as
effective at providing retirement savings as other sorts of pension plans. What they have
been good at is creating fees for the financial industry.
While a 401K component to a retirement plan is a useful tool in placing responsibility for
User locations
Create content
Audio
Blog entry
Book page
Feed
News feed story
Page
Panel
Petition
Post Office
Special
Story
Video
Log out

RSS feed for Save the
Post Office articles

RSS feed for Save the
Post Office News Briefs

8/13/13 11:50 AM What its all about: The war on workers goes to the post office | Save the Post Office
Page 5 of 7 http://www.savethepostoffice.com/what-its-all-about-war-workers-goes-post-office
saving on the individual and addressing moral hazard and free rider issues, it serves that
function best as part of the three legged stool that is FERS a defined benefit, a defined
contribution, and Social Security.
PMG Donahoe would create a plan that relies solely on employee contributions,
supplemented by questionable and certainly not guaranteed employer contributions. Seniors
today are less and less secure because of the shift to these sorts of programs. While large
institutions, hedge funds, and banks may have recovered from the machinations of the stock
market created by the crisis, individuals have not done so well.

Emulating the private sector
When it comes to health care, the dirty little secret is that the solution to less costly
healthcare for Federal employees generally and postal employees specifically has been
around for thirty years. In 1984 changes were made in Social Security and Medicare to shore
up those plans for the future. Despite the dire warnings offered by those whose ultimate goal
is to turn back the clock to a time before we had a solid social safety net, both of those
systems are in generally good actuarial shape. Under current scenarios, Social Security can
pay full benefits through about 2035 and 75% thereafter; a few tweaks like indexing the
wages subject to the payroll tax would extend that timeline significantly.
The problems with Medicare are really problems with medical costs generally. We pay nearly
twice as much per capita as any other developed nation for medical care and receive results
that, at best, put us in the middle of the pack. Lately the cost curve has been bending
down, and CBO forecasts for the future of Medicare look much better.
Those issues have been litigated endlessly but the important point to note is that the 1984
changes left a gaping hole. Federal employees and their agencies paid into Medicare, but
employees and retirees reaching the age of 65 were not required to sign up for Medicare Part
B. This meant that those in the FEHB system continued to use their FEHB coverage as the
primary payer for Part B charges rather than having their FEHB policy act as secondary or
supplemental coverage.
The organizations representing Federal employees, including postal unions, have been
shortsighted in protesting a change that would require Federal employees and retirees to
take Medicare Part B and use their FEHB program as a supplemental. Some argue that the
switch would penalize older retirees because there is a penalty for each year that one delays
in signing up for Part B. That could be easily and fairly handled by creating a grace period
following any new requirement.
Yes, the addition of Part B premiums would mean that retirees paid more in premiums, but
with the change and offerings of supplemental policies it is likely that overall premiums in
the system would come down and in any event the increases would be small and the shift
would be fair.
The FEHB program is one of the best examples of a working insurance exchange around. Its
administrative costs may not be as low as Medicares, but they are still low. If the Affordable
Care Act had had a public option, FEHB would have been the best alternative to Medicare for
all (that may be why some might want the program to fail).
Pat Donahoe claims he can build a system that works better than FEHB. He cant. After
reviewing his proposal, the GAO and even the conservative AEI questioned his ability to
design a system as effective as FEHB, with the same low administrative costs and levels of
coverage. Mr. Donahoes plan is pie in the sky, but it does serve one very effective purpose.
Taking postal workers out of Federal retirement systems might indirectly hurt the system by
setting a bad example, but taking postal workers out of FEHB would cause significant harm to
the system and probably cause premiums to rise.
The stated goal may be to create a cheaper system for the Postal Service, but the primary
purpose and the almost certain result of Donahoes proposals would be to weaken solid and
8/13/13 11:50 AM What its all about: The war on workers goes to the post office | Save the Post Office
Page 6 of 7 http://www.savethepostoffice.com/what-its-all-about-war-workers-goes-post-office
reasonable employee benefit systems. Its what the private sector has been doing for years,
and if nothing else, Donahoe wants to emulate the private sector and be more businesslike.
Its the American way reduce wages and benefits, profits to capital, a race to the bottom
for working folks.

Leaving FEHB behind
Creating the Retiree Health Benefit Fund (RHBF) and fully funding it in ten years was never
really necessary. It was done as a budget-scoring mechanism to deal with the fact that in
2002 the Office of Personnel Management had determined that the Postal Service was on
track to overfund one of its pension plans (CSRS) by over $70 billion. Decreasing the pension
payments would have increased the federal deficit by over $40 billion over a ten-year period,
so Congress came up with prefunding retiree health care to keep the money flowing into the
Treasury.
Sure, there were those who argued that the Postal Service faced a long-term liability for
retiree healthcare. Theres no question that it would be prudent to put aside money for that
future obligation, even though retiree premiums have been paid out of current revenues for
years. The thing is that the adjustment to requiring those over 65 to participate in the
Medicare programs that both they and the employer had paid for would have mostly solved
the problem and made RHBF, at least the way it was enacted, wholly unnecessary.
Employee organizations across the government will likely reject any call for their members to
pay more, and requiring the use of Medicare would almost certainly cost the average person
over 65 a bit more. But paying a bit more to save a system that works well and is a good
example of a health benefit system and doing so to close what, by any measure is a loophole,
is both sensible and reasonable.
Over the years some of the postal unions have dabbled with the idea of taking their members
out of FEHB. Currently both the NALC and the APWU are entertaining suggestions to do just
that. They can fool themselves into believing that a smaller pool of employees can create a
better system, but at the least they would have to concede that any system they create
would have to include a requirement that those over 65 use Medicare as a first payer and the
pool policy as a supplemental.

Breaking the unions, undermining good programs
From the beginning, the management of the Postal Service has used the deficits created by
the RHBF to heighten and magnify the financial crisis. The various employee associations
argued this with some degree of effectiveness, but other issues like the supposed pension
overpayments endorsed by the Segal report clouded the narrative.
The fact was and still remains that the postal financial crisis has been used primarily as a
means of breaking the union workforce and undermining Federal benefit systems while also
undermining public infrastructure. It is a course consistent with the direction of American
business over the last thirty years or more, and its worked.
Early on some folks proposed two immediate concessions that postal employees ought to
make. The first was the Medicare participation and the second was equalization of postal
health premiums with other Federal employees. The second would have yielded an
immediate savings to the Postal Service of between $600 and $700 million per year. Yes, it
would have been a tough concession. Unions exist to bargain for their members advantage,
but in this case there are good arguments that if postal workers are to benefit from
participation in Federal benefit plans, then they ought to share the benefits and burdens like
all Federal employees.
Had the employee organizations offered those solutions early on, they would have destroyed
any arguments that supported RHBF. It took at least a couple of years for the media to pick
8/13/13 11:50 AM What its all about: The war on workers goes to the post office | Save the Post Office
Page 7 of 7 http://www.savethepostoffice.com/what-its-all-about-war-workers-goes-post-office
When the post office is closed, the flag comes down. When the human side of government closes its doors, were all in trouble.
Jennings Randolph, U.S. Senator from West Virginia, 1958-85
up on the narrative, but by that time the damage was done. The losses piled up, volume fled
the system, and most of America was convinced that the story was simple without much
nuance.
In the end the APWU signed one of the worst negotiated agreements in the history of
American labor. The other unions faced arbitrations that used the APWU agreement as a
model. The result was a give back of wages and benefits that had been won over forty years
and the creation of a part-time, cheaply paid workforce with second-tier benefits. The
postmaster organizations added to the debacle by trying to preserve things like convention
leave while ultimately agreeing to keep silent while the Postal Service perpetrated POStPlan,
an effort that will likely result in the closure of thousands of post offices, the loss of
thousands of jobs, and a great loss in service and effectiveness for rural communities across
the United States.

Destroying the middle class
Anyone who believes that what is happening to the Postal Service is the inevitable result of
structural changes to the economy or technological changes within the communications
industry is simply blind to the class warfare that the American worker and the American
middle-class have been subjected to for the last forty years.
This postal crisis is not about changing technologies. It isnt about an unsuitable business
model. It isnt even about maintaining low rates for industry weve had some of the
lowest postal rates in the world before and during this crisis. No, this is first and foremost
about breaking the back of one of the more successful labor sectors in the economy.
This is about ensuring that good benefit and compensation systems are destroyed because our
economy no longer exists as a marketplace where consumers, workers, and business coexist
and share in the benefits of mutual labors. This is about class warfare and the destruction of
the American middle-class, the usurpation of the economy by the few at the expense of the
many.
[Mr. Jamison is a retired postmaster and a regular contributor to Save the Post Office; his
articles are archived here. He can be reached at Mij455@gmail.com.]
Photo credits: Newsweek cartoon; postal rallies in Portland, OR; White River, VT; San
Francisco, CA.
Sources:
Labor's Declining Share of Income and Rising Inequality, Economists View, Sept. 25, 2012
Corporate Profits as a Share of GDP, Economists View, May 6, 2013
Cumulative change in hourly productivity, real average hourly compensation, and median
compensation, 19732011, State of Working America
3 reads Printer-friendly version Send to
friend
Tags jamison