This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources.
Original Description:
Original Title
Zhang 2007, An Optimization of Intermittent Corn Drying in a Laboratory Scale Thin Layer Dryer (3)
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources.
This article was downloaded by: [Cinvestav del IPN]
On: 09 April 2013, At: 08:55
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Drying Technology: An International Journal Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ldrt20 AN OPTIMIZATION OF INTERMITTENT CORN DRYING IN A LABORATORY SCALE THIN LAYER DRYER Q. Zhang a & J.B. Litchfield a a Department of Agricultural Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801 Version of record first published: 25 Apr 2007. To cite this article: Q. Zhang & J.B. Litchfield (1991): AN OPTIMIZATION OF INTERMITTENT CORN DRYING IN A LABORATORY SCALE THIN LAYER DRYER, Drying Technology: An International Journal, 9:2, 383-395 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07373939108916672 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. DRYING TECHNOLOGY, 9(2), 383-395 (1991) AN OPTIMIZATION OF INTERMITTENT CORN DRYING IN A LABORATORY SCALE THIN LAYER DRYER Q. Zhang and J.B. Litchfield Department of Agricultural Engineering University of Illinois Urbana, IL 61801 Key Words and Phrases: Tempering; time lag; multi-stage drying; control strategy ABSTRACT An intermittent corn drying process of drying-tempering-drying in a laboratory scale thin layer dryer was optimized. A time lag function was developed to describe the influence of the tempering period on the drying rate in the post-tempering drying period. Three dryer control strategies (1) a drying-rate-first strategy, (2) an energy-efficiency-first strategy, and (3) an equal- importance (ratelefficiency) strategy were investigated. Results showed that intermittent drying processes were optimal except when a high drying rate was desired. INTRODUCTION During the falling-rate drying regime, the drying rate falls with time because the internal migration rate of moisture is slower than the evaporation rate from the surface. By inserting a tempering, or holding, period during the 383 Copyright @ 1991 by Marcel Dekker, lnc. D o w n l o a d e d
b y
[ C i n v e s t a v
d e l
I P N ]
a t
0 8 : 5 5
0 9
A p r i l
2 0 1 3
384 ZHANG AND LITCHFIELD falling-rate regime, the net drying rate can be raised. A drying process which includes both active drying stages and tempering periods is an intermittent drying process. Intermittent drying also makes it convenient to apply different drying temperatures for each stage. Brook and Bakker-Arkema (1978) found that a high drying temperature might be safely applied in early stages of drying in a multi-stage dryer. The authors also noted the possibility of obtaining higher quality dried corn from an intermittent drying process than from a continuous drying process. The objectives of this study were to: (1) develop a time lag function to determine the influence of tempering on drying rate during post-tempering drying; and (2) optimize an intermittent drying process under three control strategies: drying rate first, energy efficiency first, and equal importance. METHODOLOGY This study included two steps. First, we developed a time lag function for describing the influence of tempering on the drying rate in the subsequent drying period. A laboratory thin layer dryer was used, and a series of intermittent drying tests with different tempering periods between two drying periods were conducted. Secondly, we conducted a system optimization to develop an optimal drying process for specific control strategies. Three control strategies, with objectives of, (1) drying rate first, (2) energy efficiency first, and (3) equal importance (of both rate and efficiency), were studied. A laboratory thin layer dryer was developed with a load cell to determine product weight during drying. The temperature and the velocity of D o w n l o a d e d
b y
[ C i n v e s t a v
d e l
I P N ]
a t
0 8 : 5 5
0 9
A p r i l
2 0 1 3
I NTERMI TTENT CORN DRYING 385 the drying air were measured by thermocouple and anemometer. The dry- and wet-bulb temperatures of ambient air were measured with a psychrometer. The initial and final moisture content of samples was determined by oven test (ASAE Standard S352.1, 1989). DEVELOPMENT OF A TIME LAG FUNCTION Page's equation of thin layer drying (1949) was applied in this study. where: M. is kernel initial moisture content, M is kernel current moisture content, Me is kernel equilibrium moisture content, 7 is the drying time, and k and n are constants. Misra and Brooker (1980) compiled data for shelled corn drying in thin layer dryers and derived two expressions for the constants k and n in Page's equation. where: T is drying temperature (2.2"C 5 T 5 71.1 "C), V, is drying-air velocity near the kernels (0.025 mls 5 V. I 2.33 mls), RH is relative D o w n l o a d e d
b y
[ C i n v e s t a v
d e l
I P N ]
a t
0 8 : 5 5
0 9
A p r i l
2 0 1 3
386 ZHANG AND LITCHFIELD humidity (3.0% S RH 5 83.O%), and M, is corn initial moisture content (0.18 kglkg 5 M, S 0.6 kgtkg). To determine the influence of tempering on the drying rate in the subsequent drying period, we conducted a series of 27 intermittent drying experiments. The experiments included two drying periods of 20 minutes each separated by tempering periods of 0, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 45, 60, and 120 minutes. The test conditions included drying temperatures of 40, 60 and 80C with ambient air temperature 25"C, ambient relative humidity 53.3%, and drying-air velocity 1.2 mls. Corn dried faster after tempering, so there was an additional, or incremental, moisture loss for the intermittent processes as compared with the continuous, or tempering, process. The incremental moisture loss was a function of drying temperature and tempering time (Fig. 1). Moisture losses increased with tempering time in an exponential fashion. The maximum moisture losses and the increment in moisture losses also increased with increasing drying-air temperature. A concept of time lag, T,, was introduced to describe the effect of tempering on drying rate in the subsequent drying period. The time lag was defined as a period of time shift. The drying rate of the post-tempering drying period was higher, as if the drying curve was shifted back in time. Time lags were determined for the experimental drying processes by a trial and error method using a moisture-time shift (Table 1). By applying a least square error searching method, a time lag function was developed based on the experimental data. The experimental data were compared to the curve generated by Eq. (4) (Fig. 2). D o w n l o a d e d
b y
[ C i n v e s t a v
d e l
I P N ]
a t
0 8 : 5 5
0 9
A p r i l
2 0 1 3
INTERMITTENT CORN DRYING 387 FIGURE 1. Incremental moisture loss caused by tempering as compared with continuous (no tempering) processes TABLE 1 Experimental Time Lag Values (minutes) for 9 Different Tempering Periods At 3 Different Drying-Air Temperatures - - Drying Temperature Record (Minutes) Temperature 0 10 15 20 25 30 35 60 120 D o w n l o a d e d
b y
[ C i n v e s t a v
d e l
I P N ]
a t
0 8 : 5 5
0 9
A p r i l
2 0 1 3
3 88 ZHANC AND LITCHFIELD TEMPERING TIME (min.) FIGURE 2. Measured and simulated time lag values as a function of tempering time at three drying temperatures With the time lag function (Eq. 4) it was possible to apply the Misra- Brooker model by using an equivalent drying time, T,, instead of the actual drying time, r, for the post-tempering drying period. If T,, and T,, are the actual times for the pre- and post-tempering drying stages, respectively, the equivalent drying time of the post-tempering drying stage was defined as Model predictions and experimental results (Figs 4, 5 and 6) were in close agreement as discussed below. D o w n l o a d e d
b y
[ C i n v e s t a v
d e l
I P N ]
a t
0 8 : 5 5
0 9
A p r i l
2 0 1 3
INTERMITTENT CORN DRYING OPTIMIZATION MODEL A process of drying-tempering-drying for drying shelled corn in a laboratory scale thin layer was optimized. The optimization considered net drying time, energy consumption, and total processing time. Energy consumption was a function of drying temperature and drying time. The objective function of this optimization was to minimize the sum of weighted indexes of net drying time @T&, energy consumption ( ECA, and total processing time (PT,&, subject to a constraint on the final moisture content. minimize: Y = c,xDTe+c,xECe+c3xPTi, constranit MC s 20.0% where DT- = drying time of intermittent process drying time of continuous process - - energy consum. of intermittent process EC- energy connun. of continuous process (8) - - process time of intermittent process PT& process time of continuous process (9) where c,, q, and c3 are the weighting factors of each index. The selection of weighting factors depended on control strategies. Since some moisture loss would occur during cooling, we chose a final moisture content constraint of 20.0% dry basis, about 1.7% above typical storage moisture for corn. D o w n l o a d e d
b y
[ C i n v e s t a v
d e l
I P N ]
a t
0 8 : 5 5
0 9
A p r i l
2 0 1 3
ZHANG AND LITCHFIELD Updating ratios Initial Determining system variable & - , More ratios? rati os obj. func. value I Determining optimal process variables i FIGURE 3. Flowchart of the "switchback" optimization technique TABLE 2 sunimary of Weighting Factors, Optimal Processing Periods and Optimal Drying-Temperatures for Three Process Control Strategies Process Weighting Drying Tempering Drying Control Factors Stage I Stage Stage I1 Strategy c, c, c, t' T" t t T Drying rate first .2 .1 .7 100 67 - Energy eff. first .2 .7 .1 50 67 90 20 74 Equal of rateleff. .33 .33 .33 60 67 60 20 76 . processing period (min.) " drying temperature ("C) D o w n l o a d e d
b y
[ C i n v e s t a v
d e l
I P N ]
a t
0 8 : 5 5
0 9
A p r i l
2 0 1 3
INTERMITTENT CORN DRYI NG 391 33 3 1 + Measured data 29 27 25 23 2 1 PROCESS TIME (rnin.) FIGURE 4. Simulated and measured drying curves for the optimum drying rate first strategy When the optimum value of the objective function for a specific process was less than one, the optimal process was intermittent. Otherwise, a continuous drying process was better. Since intermittent drying also allows for different drying temperatures in each drying period, a characteristic which can help to improve product quality, temperatures were determined on the basis of initial moisture content at each stage of the process. Since the allowable drying temperature is different for various end uses of corn, we assumed a value of 75 % of the maximum temperatures suggested by Nellist (1978) as the allowable drying temperatures for our example calculations. D o w n l o a d e d
b y
[ C i n v e s t a v
d e l
I P N ]
a t
0 8 : 5 5
0 9
A p r i l
2 0 1 3
392 ZHANG AND LITCHFIELD. 0 Simulated doto + Measured data 19 ! 1 I 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 PROCESS TIME (min.) FIGURE 5. Simulated and measured drying curves for the optimum energy efficiency first strategy A Generalized Newton-Raphson method (Stoecker, 1989) was used as the optimization algorithm. A technique of "switchback" optimization (Pedersen, 1989) was applied in this optimization by which only the drying time of the pre-tempering period was selected as the system design variable. The tempering time and the drying time of the post-tempering period were evaluated as ratios of the system design variable (Fig. 3). Drying temperatures and energy consumptions of both drying stages were treated as system parameters. We optimized Eq. (6) for three different drying strategies by adjusting the weighting factors ci. An initial moisture content of 32.8 % dry basis with D o w n l o a d e d
b y
[ C i n v e s t a v
d e l
I P N ]
a t
0 8 : 5 5
0 9
A p r i l
2 0 1 3
INTERMITTENT CORN DRYING 393 33 0 Simulated data 3 1 + Measured data n P 29 M - 27 5 8 u 25 P G 8 23 I 2 1 19 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 PROCESS TIME (rnin.) FIGURE 6. Simulated and measured drying curves for the optimum equal importance strategy ambient air temperature of 27C relative humidity of 18%, and drying air velocity of 1 mls were assumed. Table 2 summarizes the weighting factors and the corresponding processing periods and drying temperatures for these control strategies. For the drying rate first control strategy, a continuous drying process with a drying temperature of 67C and drying time of 100 minutes was determined to be optimum. An experiment was conducted to check the accuracy of the drying model (Eq. 1-5). The theoretical curve and experimental results of time-moisture content matched well (Figure 4). D o w n l o a d e d
b y
[ C i n v e s t a v
d e l
I P N ]
a t
0 8 : 5 5
0 9
A p r i l
2 0 1 3
394 ZHANG AND LITCHFIELD For the energy efficiency first strategy, the optimal process was 67C drying for 50 minutes, tempering for 90 minutes, and 74C drying for 20 minutes. The experimental results showed that the simulated curve of intermittent drying matched the experimental data well (Figure 5). For the equal-importance (drying rate and energy efficiency) strategy, a process of a 67C drying for 60 minutes, tempering for 60 minutes, and 76C drying for 20 minutes was best. Again the simulated curve and experimental results matched well (Figure 6). CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS An intermitkit drying process with a single tempering stage can reduce net drying time, as well as energy consumption, compared with a continuous drying process. The system optimization indicated that an intermittent drying process was optimal for drying control strategies of energy efficiency first and equal importance of drying rate and energy efficiency. A continuous drying process with no tempering would be recommended when drying rate is the most important consideration. The drying rate after tempering was higher than that of a corresponding period for a process without tempering. After developing a time lag function, it is possible to apply the Misra-Brooker model for predicting the drying rate in the post-tempering drying stage. Experimental drying results matched the predicted drying curves. Drying processes with more than one tempering period might be better than processes with only a single tempering period. Further studies on drying processes with multiple tempering periods are needed. Intermittent drying techniques can be applied on commercial dryers to increase efficiency, reduce net drying time, and improve product quality. More tests should be conducted in both laboratory and commercial dryers to further develop this technique. D o w n l o a d e d
b y
[ C i n v e s t a v
d e l
I P N ]
a t
0 8 : 5 5
0 9
A p r i l
2 0 1 3
INTERMITTENT CORN DRYING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors thank Mr. A. Breen for his laboratory assistance. REFERENCES American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 1989. Standard: ASAE S352.1 Moisture measurement -- Grain and seeds. Brook, R.C. and Bakker-Arkema, F.W. 1978. Simulation for design of commercial concurrent-flow grain dryers. Transactions of ASAE 21(5):978-981. Misra, M.K. and Brooker, D.B. 1980. Thin-layer drying and rewetting equations for shelled yellow corn. Transactions of ASAE 23(6): 1254- 1260. Nellist, M.E., 1978. Safe temperatures for drying grain. National Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedford. Page, G., 1949. Factors influencing the maximum rates of air drying shelled corn in thin layer. M.S. Thesis, Purdue University. Pedersen, C.O., 1989. Unpublished lecture notes. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Stoecker, W.F., 1989. Design of l%ermal Systems, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY. D o w n l o a d e d