L. Tartakovsky, V. Baibikov, M. Veinblat 3 rd Conference on UAV Propulsion Technologies Technion, Haifa 30 January 2014 Technion Israel Institute of Technology Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Internal Combustion Engine Laboratory The problem UAV engine's power drop under high-altitude flight conditions One of Possible Solutions Engine turbocharging Main objectives Keeping a Wankel engines rated brake power as constant as possible in the altitudes range between 0 and 15,000 feet Possible improvement of engines efficiency Selection of a turbocharger currently available on the market for Wankel engine supercharging Simulation approach Application of the GT-POWER software initially intended for modeling reciprocating piston engines for simulating a rotary Wankel engine Main differences between Wankel and piston engines affecting their performance Difference in patterns of working chamber volume and surface change with the shaft angle Differences in the heat transfer conditions Hot and cold stator zones of the Wankel working chamber surfaces are separated contrary to a piston engine Charge rotational movement of Wankel working chamber Differences in combustion patterns Unfavorable shape of Wankel working chamber - higher surface/volume ratio Larger relative value of crevice volumes Development of a piston-to-Wankel engine geometric similarity criteria
Displacement equality Compression ratio equality Identical behavior of working chamber volume dependence on angle of shaft rotation Identical behavior of working chamber surface-to-volume ratio change vs. angle of shaft rotation Identical behavior of intake and exhaust ports discharge coefficients vs. angle of shaft rotation The method Compilation of the virtual reciprocating piston engine, geometrically similar to the considered Wankel engine Modifying the Wiebe equation used for simulation of the fuel combustion by taking into account the peculiarities of the combustion process in a Wankel engine Application of the modified relationship between Nusselt, Prandtl and Reynolds numbers for calculation of the heat transfer coefficient; Virtual blowing of the intake and exhaust ports for calculation of their discharge coefficients. Simulated Wankel engine Naturally aspirated, spark ignition, single-rotor Rated shaft speed 8,100 rpm Rated brake power 70 HP Displacement of each working chamber 344cc Designation Parameter Value z Number of cylinders 3 Compression ratio 7.6 B Bore, mm 118.6 S Stroke, mm 31.2 R Crank radius, mm 15.6 L Conrod length, mm 220 V d Displacement, cm 3 1032 Parameters of the virtual piston engine Geometric similarity 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 Rotor or 0.5*crankshaft angle, degrees W o r k i n g
c h a m b e r
v o l u m e ,
c m 3 Wankel Piston 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 Rotor or 0.5*crankshaft angle, degrees W o r k i n g
c h a m b e r
s u r f a c e / v o l u m e
r a t i o , c m 2 / c m 3 Wankel Piston Working chamber volume Working chamber surface/volume ratio Altitude performance of the naturally aspirated Wankel engine At flight altitude of 15,000 feet the engine's power drops by a factor of 1.7 7 0 . 1 6 1 . 6 5 3 . 9 4 6 . 9 4 0 . 5 2 0 0 . 9 1 9 9 . 7 2 0 1 . 5 2 0 3 . 6 2 0 9 . 2 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 0 3750 7500 11250 15000 Altitude, feet Break power, hp SFC, g/(hp*h) Air pressure , bar x 100 Air temperature, K Air density x 100 kg/m3 Turbocharger selection Garret GT12 and GT15 turbochargers were selected for further consideration Turbocharger selection The required air flow rate is marked by red line Turbocharger Garret
GT1548 was finally
selected Simulation model of the turbocharged engine in the GT-Power 1 cylinders; 2 turbine wheel; 3 compressor wheel; 4 throttle; 5 wastegate controller Altitude performance prediction throttling the intake manifold Sea level 7,500 feet 15,000 feet At altitude 15,000 feet and 4500 rpm the compressor enters into the surge zone At altitude 15,000 feet and 8100 rpm the compressor works very close to its maximal operation speed 180,000 rpm Altitude performance throttling the intake manifold 1 9 2 . 0 1 9 0 . 8 1 9 0 . 3 6 9 . 6 6 9 . 4 7 1 . 6 118.6 134.6 180.9 3 1 3 84 3 18.6 24.6 29.7 0.0 25.0 50.0 75.0 100.0 125.0 150.0 175.0 200.0 225.0 0 3750 7500 11250 15000 Altitude, feet BSFC, g/(hp*h) Break power, hp Turbocharger speed, rpm / 1000 Throttle angle, deg Throttle discharge coefficient x 100 Altitude performance prediction Damping volume in the intake manifold 1 cylinders; 2 turbine wheel; 3 compressor wheel; 4 throttle; 5 wastegate controller; 6 - damping volume Dependence of the air flow swing on the value of the damping volume Altitude performance prediction Damping volume in the intake manifold Sea level 7,500 feet 15,000 feet No surge danger Turbocharger operates far from its maximal operation speed Altitude performance Damping volume in the intake manifold Plenum 184 185.5 187.3 70 71.1 70.7 115.607 131.496 151.004 36 45 90 0 3750 7500 11250 15000 Altitude, feet BSFC, g/(hp*h) Break power, hp Turbocharger speed, rpm / 1000 Throttle angle, deg Comparison of the engine performance with different methods of pressure waves suppression - Altitude 15,000 feet Better specific fuel consumption by about 1.5% Turbocharger operates far from its maximal operation speed Engine power under partial loads is up to 27% higher 1 the damping volume 2 the throttle screening Conclusions A modeling was carried out by using the GT-POWER software. The method of compiling a virtual piston engine was applied At the flight altitude of 15,000 feet Wankel engines power drops by a factor 1.7 Performance predictions of the turbocharged engine confirmed a possibility of maintaining its power at all altitudes up to 15,000 feet, but revealed presence of a strong pressure wave process in the engine's intake manifold Two different methods of the compressor wheel protection from impact of the intake air pressure waves were studied: throttling and dumping volume use Very important advantage of the damping volume method is a reduction of the turbocharger's speed by about 17% under maximal power and higher engine efficiency by about 1.5% practically under entire engine speed range Expected increase of the supercharged engine weight may be assessed as 6 kg.
Thank you!
More info: tartak@technion.ac.il Technion Israel Institute of Technology Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Internal Combustion Engine Laboratory